Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Case study on dairy value chain in China(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Advertisement

Case study on dairy value chain in China

  1. Case study on dairy value chain in China Hongmin Dong1 Sha Wei1 Lini Wollenberg2 Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agricultural, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont
  2. 0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60 80 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018 Consumption ratio of milk (%) Year Consumption ratio Conmsumption amount Production amount Production and consumption amount of milk (Million ton) Trend of production and consumption of milk in China • The production amount of milk in 2018 increased 34.9 times compared with 1978 • The consumption amount of milk in 2018 increased 15.8 times compared with 1978 • The consumption ratio of milk to total animal product consumption increased from 18.1% in 1978 to 22.0% in 2018
  3. Development of dairy sector in China • Dairy cattle population has increased 16.2 times from 0.64 million in 1980 to 10.38 million in 2018 • Productivity has also increased 1.7 times, from 3200 kg/head/yr in 1980 to 5400 kg/head/yr in 2018 • The proportion of large-scale farms with more than 100 head increased from 12% in 2002 to 58% in 2017
  4. Development stages of Chinese dairy industry  In 2018, Dairy industry revitalization plan • over 65% dairy cattle are from large-scale (>100 head ) • self-sufficiency of milk maintained above 70% • The qualified rate of product is over 99% • The comprehensive utilization rate of livestock manure is over 75% Transforming and upgrading Stable development period Rapid expansion 2008-2016 1997-2007 1979-1996 After 2017 Sustainable development Revitalization of dairy industry–safty and green production
  5. GHG emission from dairy sector Enteric CH4 emission Dairy 11.0 % Manure CH4 emission Dairy 6.1% Manure N2O emission Dairy 8.9% Contribution of different animals Dairy ranks top 5
  6. On September 22, 2020, general secretary Xi Jinping solemnly declared in the general debate of the seventy-fifth UN General Assembly: • China will enhance its independent contribution and adopt more effective policies and measures • Carbon dioxide emissions to peak by 2030 • Strive for carbon neutrality by 2060 New requirements and targets for carbon reduction • CO2 emissions per unit of GDP shall reduce by 18% in the 14th Five-Year period • Make plan to achieve the peaking of carbon dioxide emissions around 2030 and making best efforts to peak early • Implement a system with carbon intensity mainly and total carbon emission control auxiliary • Make efforts to control CH4, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and other GHGs Outline of 14st-five plan and long term goals for 2035 in China Goal of carbon peaking and neutralization
  7. Assessment of improvement options System boundary Assessment unit Milk powder Fresh milk
  8. Carbon footprint of Chinese dairy sector Basic information of case study farm • The total stock number of case study farm is 1677 head • The proportion of adult cow (milking cows and dry cows) is 47.2%. • The average milk yield was 8.68 t (head yr)-1 • The milk protein and fat were 3.37% and 4.00% Items Unit Value Source Electricity consumption MW· h/yr 1800 Farm survey Diesel consumption L/yr 53664 Farm survey Raw milk use for milk powder ton/ton 8 Processing survey Raw milk use for fresh milk ton/ton 0.95 Processing survey Electricity consumption-milk powder kwh/ton milk powder 700 Processing survey Natural gas-milk powder m3/ton 420 Processing survey Electricity consumption-fresh milk kwh/ton fresh milk 95 Processing survey Natural gas-fresh milk m3/ton 30 Processing survey Raw material and energy consumption use during milk production in China: on-farm and processing stages
  9. Carbon footprint of Chinese dairy sector CF and key contribution stage • Allocated carbon footprint was 1.92 kg CO2-eq kg-1 FPCM • Lower than the average CO2-eq in global, but higher than US (1.2), Irish (1.2), Australian (1.1 kg), Canada (0.92 kg), New Zealand (0.78 kg) and EU (0.6-1.5 kg). There is a big gap on carbon footprint between this cased study farm and other countries. • The key contributions of GHG emission are feed production and processing > enteric fermentation > energy consumption > manure application > transport > manure management • GHG emissions per tonne of milk powder was 8.6 times higher than per tonne of fresh milk, at 16.66 kg CO2-eq kg-1 milk powder.
  10. Carbon footprint of Chinese dairy sector without processing stage Mitigation options and potential • Practice for increasing milk yield had the highest mitigation potential (-22.5%) • The CF of feed mitigation would decline by 19.4% compared with baseline S0 • Combination scenario (S6) had the highest mitigation potential (-33.3%) to close the gap compared with other scenarios in China, and the carbon footprint of milk is 1.28kg CO2-eq/kg FPCM.
  11. Land use for dairy production Feed type Feed input (t/yr) Yield (t/ha) Land use (ha) Roughage Corn silage 10000 67.50 148.15 Imported Alfalfa 600 8.15 73.66 Leymus 400 4.50 88.89 Oat grass 400 15.00 26.67 Cotton seed a 400 1.76 348.94 Concentrated feed Corn 1200 7.52 159.51 Soybean meal b 1200 2.10 714.13 Cottonseed meal c 200 348.94 Brewer's grains d 1800 Barley 864 7.50 115.20 Rice 360 7.06 51.00 Total land use (ha) 2075.08 Total FPCM (ton) 9117.28 Land use per ton FPCM (ha) 0.23 Land use per ton fresh milk (ha) 0.22 Land use per ton milk power (ha) 1.82  Land use per ton FPCM was estimated at 0.23 ha  Soybean meal accounted for 34.4% of the land footprint, followed by cotton seed and cottonseed meal. Corn and corn silage accounted for 7.7% and 7.1% of the total land use  Land use per ton of milk powder was 7.6 times higher than that for fresh milk, at 1.82 ha kg-1 milk powder.
  12. Conclusions and recommendations  There is obvious GHG emission reduction potential both on-farm and in the value chain.  Feed was a key hotspot of GHG emissions in this farm, changing feed composition and feeding regime would not only reduce GHG emissions per unit of milk produced, but also reduce the land use requirements to produce each kg of milk.  Due to the high land use and import dependence, identifying other protein feeds, such as beet meal, rapeseed meal or distiller’s grains, to replace soybean feed is suggested to reduce the carbon and land footprint of China’s dairy value chain.  Energy efficiency interventions may be key in the milk powder production stage
Advertisement