Designing and planning a
teaching session
Anna Stockman, Blekinge Institute of Technology
Based on Designing and Planning Teaching by Dr Clive Young. Licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/calt/support/cpd4he/resources/planning_teaching
Based on a work at www.ucl.ac.uk.
University of Rwanda, Kigali, 20140310-20140311
Expected learning outcomes
• familiar with the notion “constructive alignment”
• able to select appropriate teaching and learning activities to
support chosen intended outcomes
At the end of this session participants should be:
Constructive alignment
John B. Biggs has treated the subject in several
books and articles.
One example:
Biggs, J. 1996, "Enhancing teaching through constructive
alignment", Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 347-
364.
Constructive alignment – what is it?
Constructive alignment
– congruence between
• What the teacher intends learners to
be able to do, know or understand
(can be described as outcomes)
• How they teach i.e. the activities
• How they assess
Constructive alignment
New learning and knowledge builds on
old understanding – rarely a „blank
slate‟
Learning is not just adding knowledge but
bringing change or transformation to
pre-existing concepts to refine
understanding and linkages – hence
notion of „deep learning‟
(Video)
Constructive alignment
What the teacher intends students to learn:
“outcomes”
Planning starts with clear learning
outcomes and the aim of planning is to
align our learning activities with these.
Rationale: the planning of learning
experiences and assessment of student
learning has a significant impact on
students‟ approaches to learning.
Consider the disciplinary contexts
Constructive alignment
How will the intended learning outcomes
be communicated to students, staff and
external audiences?
Use language which students can
understand

Information literacy at UR, workshop 2 2014

  • 1.
    Designing and planninga teaching session Anna Stockman, Blekinge Institute of Technology Based on Designing and Planning Teaching by Dr Clive Young. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/calt/support/cpd4he/resources/planning_teaching Based on a work at www.ucl.ac.uk. University of Rwanda, Kigali, 20140310-20140311
  • 2.
    Expected learning outcomes •familiar with the notion “constructive alignment” • able to select appropriate teaching and learning activities to support chosen intended outcomes At the end of this session participants should be:
  • 3.
    Constructive alignment John B.Biggs has treated the subject in several books and articles. One example: Biggs, J. 1996, "Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment", Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 347- 364. Constructive alignment – what is it?
  • 4.
    Constructive alignment – congruencebetween • What the teacher intends learners to be able to do, know or understand (can be described as outcomes) • How they teach i.e. the activities • How they assess
  • 5.
    Constructive alignment New learningand knowledge builds on old understanding – rarely a „blank slate‟ Learning is not just adding knowledge but bringing change or transformation to pre-existing concepts to refine understanding and linkages – hence notion of „deep learning‟ (Video)
  • 6.
    Constructive alignment What theteacher intends students to learn: “outcomes” Planning starts with clear learning outcomes and the aim of planning is to align our learning activities with these. Rationale: the planning of learning experiences and assessment of student learning has a significant impact on students‟ approaches to learning. Consider the disciplinary contexts
  • 7.
    Constructive alignment How willthe intended learning outcomes be communicated to students, staff and external audiences? Use language which students can understand