Downloaded 12 times
![• LSE Impact Blog. (2012, February 24). Five minutes with Patrick
Dunleavy and Chris Gilson: “Blogging is quite simply, one of the most
important things that an academic should be doing right now”. [Blog
post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2014, December 28). Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging
changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is
communicated [Blog post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2016, January 25). How to write a blogpost from your
journal article in eleven easy steps. [Blog post].
• Mollett A., Brumley C., Gilson C., Williams S. (2017, May 25). So you’ve
decided to blog? These are the things you should write about. [Blog
post].
http://maxpixel.freegreatpicture.com/Internet-Report-Information-Blogging-Blogger-Blog-970722
References](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2018final-180316193638/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-56-2048.jpg)
![• Wheeler, T. (2015, August 21). Permission to tweet? The
underlying principles of good science communication are
all about sharing. [Blog post].
• Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015) Identifying Twitter
audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers?
• Ortega, JL. (2017, December 4). Academic journals with a
presence on Twitter are more widely disseminated and
receive a higher number of citations. [Blog post].
References](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2018final-180316193638/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-86-2048.jpg)
![• Konkiel, S. (2016, July 8). A ‘quick and dirty’ guide to building
your online reputation. [Blog post]
• Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Universiteit Utrecht.
• Social media en investigación. Lydia Gil.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/frosch50/21492514468](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2018final-180316193638/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-125-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byXavier Lasauca i Cisa
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers
The document discusses the importance of social media for researchers in enhancing the visibility, impact, and networking opportunities associated with their work. It emphasizes the utility of altmetrics for tracking research dissemination and offers strategies for effectively engaging with online platforms to build a personal brand and connect with peers. The content advocates for active participation in social media as a means to improve academic communication and collaboration.
More Related Content
Similar to Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers
- 1. Master in TranslationalMedicine-MSc University of Barcelona, 14 March 2018 Science dissemination 2.0 Social media for researchers Xavier Lasauca i Cisa @xavierlasauca https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonahowie/8583949219/in/gallery-davidmbusto-72157668330325270/
- 3.
- 4. • To getnew information • To increase the impact and visibility of research papers • To engage with fellow researchers and meet new collaborators • To improve a researcher's public profile, build your on line reputation and thus competitiveness • As part of the research process Using social media can be really beneficial: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8540717756
- 5.
- 6.
- 8.
- 10. Source: Mobile IsEating the World, by Benedict Evans
- 11.
- 14.
- 21.
- 26. Track thedissemination of research beyond academia Show the attention, reception, and response to a published work prior to it being cited Can be applied to non-traditional research outputs like data-sets and blog posts Show research impact in real-time — scholars and journals don’t have to wait for their score to be released, like in the Journal Citation Reports Source: Enter Alternative Metrics: Indicators that capture the value of research and richness of scholarly discourse https://www.flickr.com/photos/nirak/512878595
- 28. • Adams J,Loach T. (2015). Altmetric mentions and the communication of medical research. • Maggio LA, Leroux T, Meyer HS, Artino AR. (2018). Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. https://www.flickr.com/photos/interactive-content/29441904066/ References
- 29.
- 30.
- 31. “This is meand my digital circumstance” Miquel Duran
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 37.
- 41.
- 42. Motive A: VisibilityMotive B: Networking Motive C: Information increase own impact connect with peers be up to date be found by peers and other stakeholders stay in touch with colleagues be part of a conversation present self/own work be(come) part of a community anticipate trends Source: (Micro)blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication, by Cornelius Puschmann
- 43.
- 44. It increases yourvisibility within academia. It increases your visibility outside academia. It increases your visibility more than a static site. It’s a great way of making connections. It makes it easier for people to find your published work. It’s a great way to promote events and call for papers. https://www.flickr.com/photos/anonymouscollective/4263193267
- 45.
- 47.
- 48. “The purpose ofkeeping the blog is to give me a semi-public place to describe the ongoing process of doing and thinking about my lab’s research. I hope I’ll use it to describe or explain (mainly to myself) the scientific issues I'm thinking about: - what experimentswe’ve done - what the resultswere if they worked (or possible explanations for why they didn’t work) - what experiments I think we might do or should do when time and resources permit.” Rosemarie (‘Rosie’) Redfield
- 49.
- 50.
- 55.
- 56. • LSE ImpactBlog. (2012, February 24). Five minutes with Patrick Dunleavy and Chris Gilson: “Blogging is quite simply, one of the most important things that an academic should be doing right now”. [Blog post]. • Dunleavy, P. (2014, December 28). Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is communicated [Blog post]. • Dunleavy, P. (2016, January 25). How to write a blogpost from your journal article in eleven easy steps. [Blog post]. • Mollett A., Brumley C., Gilson C., Williams S. (2017, May 25). So you’ve decided to blog? These are the things you should write about. [Blog post]. http://maxpixel.freegreatpicture.com/Internet-Report-Information-Blogging-Blogger-Blog-970722 References
- 58.
- 59.
- 60.
- 62.
- 64.
- 67.
- 68. A player morewith pulmonary embolism? Teletovic, Varejão, Mickel... Tall players, lot of flights... Are they a risk group? #basketball #pulmonary
- 70. Is there anythingas rewarding for a researcher as responding to a hypothesis in a short time?
- 73. Except for thevery end of this process – submitting the paper to the journal for peer- review – none of this way of working bears the least bit of resemblance to how I was trained to be a scholar. Source: Using Social Media to Enhance Your Research Activities, by Brian Kelly
- 75. Twitter has very direct,and very relevant implications for those in Public Health
- 76. It’s a greatway to get information you otherwise wouldn’t At conferences, Twitter is invaluable for stimulating discussion and finding out what is happening in other sessions For lecturers, Twitter can contribute to discussions and deepen understanding The way we translate information is changing https://www.flickr.com/photos/47400163@N05/7846842772
- 77.
- 79. Using Twitter, youcan join conversations with other delegates Delegates write short comments and quote speakers and you can ask for clarification, ask questions, offer opinions and thoughts Even if you’re not at the conference, you can still be involved https://www.flickr.com/photos/47400163@N05/7846842772 Twitter in Conferences
- 82. http://www.flickr.com/photos/72211347@N00/327122302# I am aresearcher and I am on Twitter… Now what?
- 83.
- 86. • Wheeler, T.(2015, August 21). Permission to tweet? The underlying principles of good science communication are all about sharing. [Blog post]. • Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015) Identifying Twitter audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers? • Ortega, JL. (2017, December 4). Academic journals with a presence on Twitter are more widely disseminated and receive a higher number of citations. [Blog post]. References
- 87.
- 88. General networks Specificnetworks
- 94.
- 95. Articles and presentations (Slideshare,issuu) Social bookmarking (Delicious, Diigo) Images (flickr, Instagram) and videos (YouTube) Bibliographic data management (Zotero, Mendeley) Video chats (Skype, Google hangouts)
- 96.
- 97.
- 98.
- 99.
- 100.
- 103.
- 104. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0900702 Ultimately, the Internet providesa powerful communications channel, but it is health care professionals and the public who will best determine how to use this channel for surveillance, prevention, and control of emerging diseases.
- 105.
- 106.
- 107. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25124281 Based on observations inthis study and the increased usage of social media, we posit that online illness reports could complement traditional surveillance systems by providing near real-time information on foodborne illnesses, implicated foods and locations.
- 108.
- 109.
- 111. 4 rules ofinfographics design by @ pere_rovira 1. - is + 2. Amount - quality - context 3. Be careful about lying and 4. statistics.
- 115.
- 116. Strategy • Define objectivesabout online presence (as individual researcher or research group) • Explore the tools and choose the most appropriate • Develop your network • Encourage feedback and discussion http://www.flickr.com/photos/ybot84/7850997682/
- 117.
- 118. 10 Simple Stepsto Building a Reputation as a Researcher, in Your Early Career 1. Register for an ORCID identifier 2. Register for information hubs: LinkedIN, Slideshare, and a domain name of your own 3. Register for Twitter 4. Write and share a 1-paragraph bio 5. Describe your research program in 2 paragraph 6. Create a CV and share it 7. Share (on Twitter & LinkedIN) news about something you did or published; an upcoming event in which you will participate; interesting news and publications in your field 8. Make writing; data; publication; software available as Open Access 9. Set up tracking of your citations, mentions, and topics you are interested in using Google scholar and Google alert, 10. Find your Klout score, H-index. Source:MicahAltman,sBlog http://nepalireporter.com/21956/paul-van-dyk-returns-uae/
- 119. Top 10 tipsto get started 1. Explore online guides (start with this). 2. Do some “lurking” (look at examples of good practice). 3. Locate pertinent and relevant online sources (e.g. who to follow on Twitter, interesting bloggers). 4. Start using content aggregation and curation tools (e.g. RSS, Diigo). 5. Identify a few key tools and start with those – know your limits! 6. Develop your network (e.g. LinkedIn, Twitter). 7. Join academic social network sites (e.g. ResearchGate, Mendeley). 8. Create your own website 9. Start blogging and twittering about your research (or whatever else takes your fancy!). 10. Keep your purpose and audience in mind. Source:IntroductiontoSocialMediaforresearchers,byGillesCouzin http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eeel45jfeg/1-tiesto-22-million/
- 120.
- 121.
- 122.
- 123.
- 125. • Konkiel, S.(2016, July 8). A ‘quick and dirty’ guide to building your online reputation. [Blog post] • Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Universiteit Utrecht. • Social media en investigación. Lydia Gil. https://www.flickr.com/photos/frosch50/21492514468
- 126. • Public Consultation:‘Science 2.0’: Science in Transition European Commission. 2014 • Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars European Commission. 2015 • Making Open Science a Reality OECD. 2015 • Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: a vision for Europe European Commission. 2016 • Next generation metrics European Commission. 2017 https://www.flickr.com/photos/european_parliament/10943216394
- 128.
- 130.
- 131. Because sharing isn’t just nice;it’s absolutely critical. Terry Wheeler xavierlasauca.cat https://www.flickr.com/photos/eightysixfilms/6176735010/