The document discusses the results of two Implicit Association Tests (IAT) taken by an individual. For the first test on racial associations, the individual does not fully agree that we are oblivious to unconsciously motivated behavior, noting it can be both true and false depending on the person. For the second test on sexual orientation associations, the individual's results showed a preference for straight people over gay people, which did not meet their expectations, as they believe they like both equally. They attribute this discrepancy to having more knowledge from others (second-hand knowledge) rather than direct experiences.

2. I do not agreed with the argument because how we interpret or justify our biases is personal and moreover unconsciously motivated behavior completely oblivious may be both true and false depends on ourselves; sometime what your unconsciously motivated behavior may be true, but sometime it may be false to your reality opinion. I strongly believe that our unconsciously motivated behavior may sometime perceived us to think the opposite way round however, consciously knowing the unawareness of your behavior help improve the ability to gain knowledge deeply on others.

3. 2891155269240

4. Sexuality IAT

5. My result didn’t meet my expectation, because it is stated that I have a strong automatic preference for straight people compared to gay people when actually I may prefer straight people but I do really like gay people for lots of reasons. Because I have lots of gay friends who is trustworthy and straightforward making it easier to understand and more comfortable talking to them. Plus I can talk to both straight and gay people equally, so the result didn’t really meet my expectation. I think the theory that fits this perfectly is second-hand knowledge because how I bases people is from my knowledge from internet and most opinion from other people.