Ethical Relativism

Ethical Relativism
For an argument to be valid the structure of the argument must be good. A valid argument is not
focused on the content, but more so the structure of the argument. The premises are supporting
statement in an argument. Premises could be false and the argument would still hold validity just
because of its structure. When an argument is being judged on validity, to be valid the argument has
to have a particular form that guarantees if the premises are true the conclusion is absolutely true.
The reason we look at the structure and not the content is because the argument is deductive.
Meaning, it is supposed to give logically conclusive support to its conclusion. Premise one in the
"Argument" is that the moral behavior from one society to another ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A sound argument is a valid argument plus actually true premises. For the argument to be sound the
conclusion has to be true. The conclusion of this argument is saying that ethical relativism is true.
Ethical relativism is a theory that relative to the norms of one's culture is morality. Based on the
argument discussed above with the different premises this argument is a sound argument. The
premises appear to be true describing that the moral behavior from one society to another differs, but
if societies shared the same rules and principles the moral behavior would be relatively the same.
Although the second premise counter acts ethical relativism and is true, but it holds no ground
because societies do not share moral behaviors. It is also explains in the third premise that societies
do not share the same morals and behaviors, and since they do not ethical relativism is true. Being as
the argument was a valid argument and the premises were true, the argument was sound. Although
the argument was sound, if premise two had a counterexample such as, the moral behavior in
different societies would be mostly the same if, societies shared cultural values and beliefs.
Assuming the other premises did not change this argument would still be valid. The reason is
because yes, premise two raises some questions and is probably true. For example, anytime you're
around certain things for a long period you are going to adapt to them. But the conclusion of the
argument is stating ethical relativism is true. The factor in this argument that still makes it sound is
premise three. Societies do not share moral rules and principles that is why so many different
cultures have developed because everyone is creating their own. The fact societies do not share their
principles determines ethical relativism being truthful in that morality is relative to the norms of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Lord Of The Flies Ralph Leadership
Leadership is a powerful and highly valued trait; however, it is one that not all possess. Look closely
at the characters in William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies. In a well–written essay, consider the
importance of leadership as it pertains to the central theme and the novel as a whole.
By examining the quality, nature and presence of leadership in the characters of William Golding's
Lord of the Flies, a reader gains vital insight to several of the central themes of the novel. Ralph and
Jack both display strong leadership qualities throughout the novel, but Jack ultimately garners more
support. This is important to Golding's argument because it shows that the use of fear, violence, and
immediate gratification are more effective methods ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From the first chapter it is clear that Piggy has the most rational, logical and adult mindset of the
group. Piggy, however, cannot impose his judgments on the group because he is fat and whiny and
therefor cannot lead. Age, stature and appearance are the gauges by which the group selects a leader,
all superficial criteria that are not directly tied to true leadership ability. Simon is similar to Piggy in
that he possesses the greatest capacity for truly 'right' morality, and yet holds no power over the
group as a whole because of his lack of superficial leadership qualities. By emphasizing Piggy and
Simon's positive character traits while simultaneously underscoring their lack of influence on the
group, Golding proves his argument that power is more important than logic and

Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry 's Speech At The...
"Give me liberty, or give me death!" is a quotation attributed to Patrick Henry, which he used to
close his speech to Virginia Convention. During this time period, the 1770s, Patrick Henry, Thomas
Paine, and Thomas Jefferson all made arguments in favor of separation of the American colonies
from Great Britain; many of these appeals were persuasive for different reasons, whether that be
logical, emotional, or pertaining to credibility and trust, which is to say logos, pathos, and ethos.
First of all, we will examine Henry's arguments during his speech at the Virginia Convention. Then,
we will identify Paine's appeals in a part of his essay, The Crisis n1. Lastly, we will evaluate
Jefferson's myriad of arguments in a part of his Autobiography. Patrick Henry, born in Virginia in
1736, was a lawyer and great orator, as well as public officer for nearly 30 years, who believed
strongly in citizens' right to bear arms, especially in face of Great Britain's injustice towards the
colonists, and whose speech to the Virginia Convention lead to the persuasion of his delegation and,
therefore, participated in the start of the Revolutionary War. (Probst 100) (Colonial Williamsburg
Patrick Henry). In his speech, Henry, whose patriotism had lead him to represent his region since
1765, addressed those who did not want to organize a militia for Virginia. (Probst 100) (Henry 102).
One of the first and most important arguments Henry makes is that the question of whether or not to
organize a

Is Personal Identity in the Mind of the Beholder?
Personal identity is a very controversial aspect of life. Who are we? What defines us? According to
John Locke, psychological continuity is what defines our personal identity. Locke discusses the case
of the prince and the cobbler to help shape his theory. However, I absolutely disagree with Locke's
theory. Locke's theory of personal identity creates many problems, such as the duplication problem.
By reformulating Locke's theory of personal identity, we still come across these problems that prove
Locke's theory false.
Summary:
Locke's argument for the memory criterion of personal identity, is that psychological continuity (the
consciousness of past experiences) is the aspect that preservers our personal identity. Locke ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The duplication problem, is one in which we assume you (A) have a terrible illness and the only
solution is to split your body into two and see which will survive. You enter the operation and the
doctors divide your body into two. Each halve–body is artificially completed, but somehow both
halves are cured and both survive. Now you have two persons (B and C), with your original
hemisphere. According to Locke's theory on psychological continuity, a past person (P1) is
numerically identical to the future person (P2) iff the future person remembers the past persons
memories, experiences, etc. Therefore, we can assume A is psychologically continuous and
numerically identical with B and A is also psychologically continuous and numerically identical
with C. By the transitivity of identity, B and C must be numerically identical. However, it is
impossible for B and C to be numerically identical. At the exact moment of the split, B and C can be
qualitatively similar, but not be numerically identical, for it is impossible to have two different
people and consider them both numerically the same person. This is proven by assuming: Charles
(B) is numerically identical with Guy Fawkes (A). Robert (C) is numerically identical with Guy
Fawkes (A).Therefore; Charles (B) is numerically identical with Robert (C). This argument is valid,
but unsound. A valid argument is one in which, if the premise are all assumed to be true, the
conclusion must be true. If we assume, Charles (B)

The Globalization Of Eating Disorders
Soundness in the Globalization of Eating Disorders
In her essay, "The Globalization of Eating Disorders," Susan Bordo informs her audience of the
growing trends in eating disorders. Through her argument, Bordo illustrates the cruel identity of
body–image distortion syndrome while she searches for a solution to the eating–disorder problem by
looking to its birthplace in culture. Making use of several examples and scenarios, facts and
statistics, and appeals to pathos and logos to construct her argument, Bordo shows a strong intent on
eradicating the growing crisis in a reasonably sound argument.
Bordo establishes herself as an authority figure through her extensive education in English and
women's studies. In her prolific writing career, Bordo often places emphasis on Western culture and
its lasting viewpoints toward gender and the body, and in view of this, Bordo's argument paves way
to influence her audience through her credibility as an expert on women and the body images that
plague them. As this authority figure, Bordo claims that the media and cultural influence have
created a negative influence on humanity's conceived standard of beauty, and as a result, have
caused the spread of eating disorders.
Employing her essay with key terms like body image, anorexia, and bulimia among other disorders,
the essayist has written her piece rife with appeals to pathos to define them; the essay's introduction
carries her readers into a girl's mind who struggles with her appearance

A Critical Step Ensuring Forensic Soundness And A Part Of...
The forensic readiness approach, as important as it is, has not been in the forefront of most
organizations until recently. This is now considered a critical step ensuring forensic soundness and is
a part of the examination process. Conducting regular audits of mission critical resources will be an
essential part of the response readiness plan because it gives the organization a subjective
measurable assessment of the organization's system preparedness. For example, audits are a tool to
conduct forensic health checkups of systems and to ensure auditing features will behave accordingly
prior to any incident occurring. According to NIST SP 800–61 (2012), the forensic investigator must
have the appropriate training, regular testing and verification of skills to access their
organizationally–used software and equipment, awareness of laws and legislation, the skill set to
handle unexpected situations and ensure that the acquisition equipment is comprehensive and
functional prior to conducting an investigation. The forensic investigator must know his or her own
limitations and recognized when it's time to bring in specialize expertise (Nelson et al, 2010) When
determining what forensic tools to take to a scene; it's more efficient to have a forensic ready tool kit
on standby. The forensic tools used to collect, analyze, and authenticate potential evidence from a
crime scene should be current technology and appropriate for the crime scene (Gogolin, 2013).
Therefore, forensic

Violent Video Games Argument Analysis
As the video games industry grows larger in popularity by the day, it becomes a subject of objection
more and more and people split into two teams as a result. On the first hand, a group claims that
video games are harmful and should be banned because of their connection with aggression, while
on the other hand, a group believes that video games have a positive impact on young people. An
article titled" Why We Need Violent Video Games" was written by Ethan Gilsdorf in order to
persuade readers that violent video games are beneficial and show the flaws in the opposing group's
arguments. The author states that virtual games have considerable advantages while responding to
some of the arguments that are against the violent video games industry by comparing the results
between violent video game killings and actual real life massacres. The text shows the perspective
of those who support the virtual violent games industry by presenting supporting examples and
comparisons that offer another viewing angle on the issue. Overall, the article introduces the author's
way of thinking about violent video games and protests against some of the counter arguments in
addition to offering solutions to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe he had a valid opinion regarding the video games effects, offered a logical and interesting
argument that highlights how they can be beneficial and compared the virtual games' side effects
with other forms of entertainment's which outstand his argument, however, he had not used
information fairly by not familiarizing the readers with the counter arguments in addition to showing
a biased interpretation of facts by not documenting the complete truth regarding the Lanza case
which raised a question regarding his motives and his article's

The And Soundness And Stability Of The International...
A.
Basel I contained two primary objectives, the first is to help to strengthen the soundness and
stability of the international banking system, the second is to alleviate competitive inequalities.
Basel I not only increases sensitivity of regulatory capital differences in risk profiles, in addition, it
considers about balance sheet exposures when assessments of capital adequacy are undertaken(Ojo,
Marianne 2011). However, the framework also discourages banks to keep liquid and low risk assets,
and it is hard to evaluate whether the minimum capital requirements for banks do harm to their
competitivesness or not and whether this framework increase competitives inequalities amongst
banks or not.
Basel I focus more on credit risks instead of the operation risk, which bank face day–to–day
problems in their business. In order to deal with this problem, Basel II creats an international
standard about the quantity of capital provisions the bank should to guard against financial and
operational risks they face. Basel II was established to achieve three committee objectives, first is to
increase the quality and the stability of the international banking system, second is to create and
maintain a level playing field for internationally active banks, the last one is to promote the adoption
of more stringent practices in the risk management (Saidenberg et al., 2003). First two goals are
important part of 1988 Accord while the third one is new regulatiton to the systems. The need for

What Moral Obligation Do The Laws Of One 's Own Country?
What moral obligation do I have to obey the law? Aside from wanting to avoid punishment for
breaking the law, is there a reason why I should follow laws that are put in place? Agreement,
gratitude, and fair play are the three main arguments that can be used for obeying the laws of one 's
own country. Though it's more difficult to apply these certain arguments in relation to a foreigner
just visiting a new country, they're still relevant. Just because they are applicable, it doesn't mean
that there aren't also arguments that can make them invalid.
The understanding that a citizen owes a debt to the government for providing them with benefits is
the main argument of gratitude. Gratitude is easier to argue when it comes to your own country
because of the idea that as a citizen you feel obligated to the government for providing you with
opportunities to have a good life. I feel indebted to my government; therefore, I'll obey the laws.
Socrates, for instance, relies on the argument of gratitude as one of his reasoning's why he won't
disobey the law even if he was wrongly accused of a crime he didn't commit. He states, "Did we not
give you life in the first place? Was it not through us that your father and married your mother and
begot you? Tell us, have you any complaint against... laws which deal with children's upbringing
and education such as you yourself had? Are you grateful to those of laws which were institutes or
his end requiring your father to give you a cultural and

The Salvation Army And Its Biblical Soundness
Robert Hawk
Dale Babinsky
Denominational Doctrines
16 September 2016
The Salvation Army and its Biblical Soundness Until very recently, I believed that the Salvation
Army was only a charity. My father had spoken to me of them about their kindness to him when he
was waiting to disembark during World War Two. I also encounter them during the holiday season
when they are ringing their bells beside donation kettles. Upon receiving my assignment to research
them, brought me to the understanding of their denominational status. In the preface to his book,
Marching to Glory, E.H. McKinley makes this clear: "The Army is more than blandly beneficial,
more than a mere charity. It is a religious crusade, an evangelical Christian denomination"
(McKinley xi).
The scope of this paper will be to examine some of the background and history of the Salvation
Army, but more importantly to analyze the Biblical soundness of their doctrine. Further, the Biblical
soundness will be presented showing where their doctrine might be lacking. This purpose is to gain
personal and shared edification with my colleagues concerning the workings of this denomination.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Its founder, according to one source states, Scriptural Answers to Religious Error 2, "An
organization [the Salvation Army] that arose within England late in the nineteenth century came
through William Booth (1829–1912), a New Connection Methodist minister" (Olbricht 20). Booth
came from a humble background. McKinley

Spoiled Or Mislead? The Affluenza Defense
Spoiled or Mislead? The Affluenza Defense
In January of 2015, student athlete Brock Turner sexually assaulted an intoxicated, unconscious
woman. In June of 2016, Turner was sentenced to a mere six months in prison. The reasoning of
such a short sentence being it would have a "severe impact on him, [and his father argued that] a
kid's life shouldn't be ruined...because of 20 minutes of action"(Dockterman 2). This argument is
one that is often brought up in recent culture. Teens or young adults who are convicted of crimes
such as sexual assault, driving under intoxication, or other similar types of crimes are often let off
the hook. This defense used is known as "Affluenza", or, as defined by Matt Gutman of ABC News,
the idea of being "too spoiled by [one's] parents to know right from wrong"(Gutman 2). The
"Affluenza" defense is a greatly debated one. Those who argue in favor of the affluenza defense
often make arguments along the lines of a spoiled life causing a child to not see consequences of
their actions. Along these lines, they argue that if the children don't see what their outcome may be,
and they carry out negative, harmful, illegal action, their life shouldn't be ruined based off of the one
bad decision. Those who believe in affluenza think that these young people can be steered straight,
and these moments can be used as teaching experiences. However, others do not agree in the
validity of the Affluenza defense. Those with this perspective also make the argument

Analysis Of The Movie ' American Sniper '
"I'm willing to meet my creator and answer for every shot that I took..." (www.imdb.com). Kyle, in
the movie American Sniper, says these exact words for a reason. Just like how Kyle had a specific
reason for the words he said, Matt Taibbi, who wrote American Sniper Is Almost Too Dumb To
Criticize, had a reason why he structured and presented the article the way he did; he has answers
within the words to explain why he wrote what he did for the most likely audience of Rolling Stone.
Not only does Taibbi present his information in a specific way, he acknowledges the expectations
for the readers of Rolling Stone. Although Taibbi's article is bias to some extent, is composed of
inappropriate grammar at times and presents various sections where he uses emotional appeals
which hurts him, Taibbi does do a brilliant job to some extent in presenting the article to the most
likely reader of Rolling Stone, an antagonistic, audience's attention and trust by using logical
arguments and developing credibility through various ways which the reader can relate to.
Rollingstone.com is a website where viewers go on to look at movie reviews, music reviews, and
pop culture. On a daily basis, the most likely audience that would go onto rollingstone.com and look
at movie reviews are the people who watched the movie and liked it a lot, but want to experience a
negative review that will upset them. On the other hand, the opposite is also true where American
Sniper is the number one movie right now

Ren?� Descartes And Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Knowledge
In 18th century Europe, philosophers widely sought after knowledge. More specifically, they sought
after the knowledge of how knowledge might be found. Two main philosophies stood in opposition:
rationalism and empiricism (Sproul 117). Immanuel Kant, a revolutionary philosopher from East
Prussia, endeavored to create a synthesis of the two philosophies (119). This synthesis illustrated a
process by which knowledge might be obtained through both ways illustrated in the two
philosophies. This synthesis, as well as much of Kant's work, was widely influential as well as
controversial, leaving philosophers throughout history to debate whether or not he was successful in
this endeavor. Oxford Dictionaries defines rationalism, in reference to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kant opposed rationalist's reluctance to adapt their philosophies to incorporate the discoveries made
through empirical evidence and empiricist's skepticism of the possibility of scientific knowledge
(Sproul 120). Thus, Kant created his synthesis. Kant's synthesis included both knowledge through
experience (a posteriori knowledge) and knowledge prior to experience (a priori knowledge).
Through this synthesis, Kant reasserts some aspects of both philosophies and denies others.
Regarding rationalism, Kant reasserts the belief in a priori knowledge, thus denying the empiricists'
denial of such knowledge (Sproul 121). He asserts that knowledge requires both a posteriori
knowledge acquired through the senses and a priori knowledge that the mind employs to categorize
and make sense of sensations. Through what Kant refers to as pure intuitions of time and space, one
may understand how their sensations fit into time and space, which, as Kant asserts, cannot be
perceived directly. This he calls apperception. Sproul succinctly explains this saying "It is the mind
that provides unity to the diversity of my sensory experience." (121). However, Kant denies that a
priori knowledge might extend past this and reasserts the empiricist belief that the collaborative
process knowledge does begin with experience (121–122). As with the vast

Descartes ' First Meditations By Rene Descartes
In René Descartes' First Meditations, he introduces three main sceptical arguments for the
possibility of doubt: illusion, dreaming and error. Descartes' purpose in his First Meditations is to
define knowledge by placing doubt on the sceptical arguments capacity to provide truth. In this
essay, I will focus on the argument from dreaming. There are many objections against the argument;
therefore I will assess the soundness of the argument and whether it establishes universal doubt
based on the plausibility of the objections. Moreover, I will further conclude that it is possible to
know if we are dreaming or not at any given moment and that we are not always in a dream.
The argument of dreaming
The principle premise of the argument from dreaming is that there are 'no sure signs by means of
which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep.' This leads to the premise that one often
feels sensations and perceptions similarly to when one is awake. Then, it is possible that we do not
know if we are dreaming right now or not. This is a valid argument which attacks all sense–
perception and allows us to doubt even the most ordinary and certain things, as you may be
dreaming them rather than actually experiencing it.
Objections to the argument
Descartes hypothesizes that we cannot distinguish the state of being in a dream and being awake. As
a result, he concludes that our sensory perception is unreliable, and we should strip down our
judgement through sensory perception and

Euthanasia Often Surfaces In Mainstream News As Being A
Euthanasia often surfaces in mainstream news as being a highly controversial issue, with strong
arguments for both positions. To be clear, euthanasia can be defined as the following, "Intentionally
taking the life of a presumably hopeless person" (Gay–Williams, 781). There are also several other
distinctions that classify euthanasia as either active or passive, based on the level of action involved,
or as voluntary, involuntary, or non–voluntary, based on the level of consent (Dittmer). However, in
this paper, when I use the term euthanasia, I am speaking of euthanasia in any of its forms. Thus, I
will argue that all forms of euthanasia are morally impermissible. Lastly, I will assess an objection
to my argument, but in the end show that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second premise is true, because given the definition of euthanasia, no one is being saved by the
act, but only the opposite, someone is being killed. For an action to be considered euthanasia, three
conditions must be met: there must be the taking of a life, the person whose life is taken must be
suffering from a disease with a terminal prognosis, and the action must be intentional (Gay–
Williams, 781). Accordingly, it is evident that there is no aspect of self–defense in this case, and no
one's life is being saved in the process of euthanasia. Therefore, it is true that euthanasia is an action
that involves the taking of someone's life, without the saving of another's life.
Therefore, given the preceding reasons for the truth of the premises, and the valid argument form,
modus ponens, the argument against euthanasia is sound. In defense of the premises, I utilized the
moral theory of natural law. For this theory, an action is judged to be moral or immoral based on it
being in accord with the natural law or not. This natural law is built into our very nature as human
beings, so an action is moral if it is consistent with our nature. I used this moral theory to show that
the desire to survive is a part of our natural law, and thus euthanasia is against our natural law as
human beings.
One might object to my argument by way of utilitarian reasoning. In

Review Of ' Seven Is Greater Than Five ' Is Valid, But...
PHIL 145
ASSIGNMENT # 3
Part 1:
1. Any argument with the conclusion "Seven is greater than five" is valid, but some such arguments
are not sound.
Answer: True. The argument with the conclusion "Seven is greater than five" is valid but in some
instances may not be sound. This is because we check that an argument is sound by if its first valid
and then if all its premises are true. Thus, sound arguments are known to end up with true
conclusions. Although in this case some arguments with the conclusion "seven is greater than five"
may not be sound because if for instance, one of the premise states that everything seven is greater
than everything 5. This premise will be false because seven centimeters is less than 5 meters/ seven
ten dollar bills are less than 5 twenty dollar bills. Therefore, since the premise will not hold true, an
argument as such will not be sound.
2. Every set of sentences that includes a logically false sentence is inconsistent.
Answer: True. A set of sentences is consistent when all the sentences are simultaneously true.
However, when a sentence is logically false, it means that it is not possible for the sentence to be
true. Thus, the sentence won't be true in any case and the set of sentences will be inconsistent.
3. If two sentences are both true, they are logically equivalent.
Answer: False. Two sentences are logically equivalent if it is not possible for the two sentences to
have different truth–values. If two sentences are true but

Contemporary Issues On Public Management
Comprehensive Exam in Public Administration id 2346
1
CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Select one example or issue from the public sectors of a major public policy. Explore in essay how
that current policy problem in government is relevant to and then undercuts the quality of public
service and the operation of key regime values and political character traits
In his book Theories of the Policy Process (2007) Paul Sabatier described the public policymaking
process as follows: "problems are conceptualized and brought to government for solution;
governmental institutions formulate alternatives and select policy solutions; and those solutions get
implemented, evaluated, and revised" (p. 3). For the purpose of this essay the Social Security and its
financial soundness problem will be considered. The alternative solutions to this problem will be
reviewed. The range of services provided by the Social Security Administration will be reviewed
with an emphasis on quality component of the public service delivery.
The financial soundness of the Social Security system is an important issue which gets frequent
attention from politicians, public servants, citizenry, and media. If the established system would fail
financially at any point in the future, it will significantly undercut the quality of public service and
undermine the trust of citizenry in the existence of the safety net within the country. It is important
to understand the nature of the problems existing within the

Don Marquis's Argument Against Abortion
Don Marquis agrees with anti–abortionists that abortion is morally wrong, but finds that they are not
making the right arguments to justify this. There is much debate over what comprises a human being
or when a fetus becomes a person, and if only a human life is of great value, so I will use the general
term "X" to present Marquis's overall argument. If X has a future like ours which has great value,
then depriving X of that future is immoral. X has a future like ours, thereby making it immoral to
kill X. Obviously, this is a broad argument defending the anti–abortionist viewpoint. In this case, X
is a fetus, so the argument becomes much more specific. If a fetus has a future like ours which has
great value, depriving a fetus of this future is morally wrong. A fetus has a future like ours, so killing
the fetus is morally wrong. Marquis offers a valid argument by modus ponens, following a logical
path with premises that guarantee his conclusion. If the future of a fetus is of great value, it would
support the notion that killing said fetus would be immoral. The content of his argument, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In other words, both the mother and child have moral status and a right to life, but the mother has a
higher status, according to Thompson. This puts her future in jeopardy, so this provokes the
question, why is the mother's life not included in Marquis's argument? Although Marquis gives a
valid argument for why abortion is immoral, it is broad and does not use real life situations. By not
doing this, it is too difficult to prove his premises true, hindering his soundness. As for his argument,
the deprivation of one's future, only the fetus's future is taken into consideration. Marquis would
perhaps need to delve into the subject of moral status to achieve a sound, as well as complete

Rachel Syme Why Web Series Are Worth Watching Analysis
People all want that heart stopping "WOW" moment in their lives, and art can easily satisfy that
want. Visual media is the most quintessential form of art in modern society. Whether it is binge
watching Orange is the New Black, watching a funny YouTube channel, or even keeping up with the
presidential race on the news, visual media is invading the minds of society. There are many
different forms of visual media, all of which want the spotlight. Many argue in favor for TV shows
as the best platform, but according to the article Why Web TV Series Are Worth Watching, written
by Rachel Syme, Web series could be a worthy contender. Syme tries to convince people to give
Web series a chance to "WOW" them. The article she writes contains many flaws ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The New Yorker is known as a prestigious media outlet, which features phenomenal writers,
therefore people argue that if the article was accepted by The New Yorker, then it was a successful
article. This argument is illogical because of the bias aspect of the article selection process. An
article should not be deemed successful just because a prestigious media outlet agrees with it.
Another argument made is that the article was mainly intended for people who regularly watch Web
series. If this was true, then the article would not have a purpose. The article tries to persuade people
why Web series are worth watching, therefore the intended audience should be those who don't
normally watch Web series. The arguments that agree with this article being successful are
completely

Analysis Of The Article ' Ready, Fire, Aim, The College...
Journalist, and professor of higher education emeritus at the University of Maryland, College Park,
Robert Birnbaum wrote the article "Ready, Fire, Aim, The College Campus Gun Fight" in which he
writes about two sides which he defines as "MoreGuns" and "BanGuns" and if one sides argument
holds more truth as to whether guns on campus is a positive or negative reality. The article comes
from a magazine called Change Magazine. Change Magazine focuses on the modern issues that
arise in higher learning. The purpose of the magazine is to inform the readers and stimulate thinking.
He reaches audiences on both sides of the argument by adopting a mostly non–emotional, and
logical tone that will connect with his readers using facts. Birnbaum builds trust with the reader by
being respectful to both sides of the arguments and presenting facts for both sides, at first he appears
to be in the middle of the issue, but then as the article continues he shows his favored stance on the
legal side by referencing the constitution which increases the strength of his argument. Should guns
be allowed on campus in any form? Birnbaum tries to answer this question by addressing the
MoreGuns and the BanGuns sides. Birnbaum does a good job of presenting the facts and statistics
then talking about them. There are no major biases as the only conclusion the he comes to is that
"the country is filled with guns, guns exist on college campuses, and there doesn't appear to be much
that can be done to

Essay on The Death Penalty:Social Ethics: Morality and...
Death Penalty
1) Two major claims: death penalty serves as a deterrent and death penalty is morally justified
because murderers can't live and you have a right to kill them.
2) The premises and conclusions that the author of the letter outlines are as follows:
Death Penalty serves as a deterrent.
a. Criminals fear the death penalty.
b. Fear of the death penalty deters criminals from carrying guns when engaged in a criminal activity.
c. Therefore, death penalty serves as a deterrent.
Death Penalty is morally justified.
a. Criminals who murder lose the right to life and deserve to die.
b. In war, you have a right to kill because you are threatened.
c. By being a murderer, you wage war on the citizens.
d. It is morally justified to kill ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Edgar Hoover's statement also stands controversial in its conclusion. In addition to these
experience–based evidences, the author also presents the 1975 L.A.P.D. study that showed "that 4
out of 5 convicts did not carry a gun when engaged in a criminal activity for fear of the death
penalty." Despite the studies' statistical support, specific details and variables are not addressed for
the study nor is the time frame completely relevant to the current society.
Again, it is excessive to say that not carrying a gun is statistically proven to lower death rates or
violent crimes and hence, death penalty, serves as a deterrent. Not carrying a gun does not correlate
with not committing a crime, neither does it correlate with not killing someone when engaged in a
criminal activity. Indeed, not carrying a gun does mean no shooting and no shooting means no
injuries or death given by guns that otherwise would be given if a criminal had carried a gun and
there was a shooting. However, wouldn't this deterrence be available with punishments other than
death penalty as well? Even the broader sense of data for the existence of capital punishment's
correlation with lower rates of capital crime (not just with not carrying a gun) is inconclusive as
generally agreed between the retentionist and abolitionists.
However, in response to the inconclusive evidence as basis against the soundness of the L.A.P.D.
study supporting the second premise, some may counter that just as

Organization is Crucial When Making a Sound Argument...
Organization is Crucial When Making a Sound Argument
The development of animal rights organizations in the past century has made hunting a heated topic
for debate. Modernization has left the primitive form of hunting and gathering behind as an obsolete
form of human survival. With this occurrence one would think that hunting would lose its
popularity, but this statement couldn't be farther from the truth. It has developed more as a sport and
participation is still widespread throughout the United States. Animal rights groups are constantly
making efforts to voice their opinions, but hunters are entitled to argue the issue as well. Writer
Jonathon Detwiler speaks on behalf of the hunter by trying to repel the accusations of ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his sources section, he has gathered information that reinforces his earlier examples through local
newspaper articles (The Greensboro News Company) on car accidents caused by animals. Even
though he doesn't cite these sources in his own article, it's obvious that he made an effort to gain
resources that helped support hunting, as an ethical matter, from neutral sources, such as local
newspapers. His use of credibility extends into other argumentative points in his article. The
economy also benefits from hunting, which can be proven by the Detwiler's contacts with the South
Dakota Fish and Game Department. They estimate a "contribution of $14 billion dollars...and
supports more than 300,000 jobs," is done by hunters annually. This statement could have been used
more effectively, but the author neglects in listing how hunters exactly contribute so much money to
the economy and how they create 300,000 jobs.
Along with the several credible examples used in Detwiler's essay are many logical arguments made
on behalf of hunting, but lose their strength due to its organization. Several people would agree with
the author on the need for animal population control. The dilemma is that the same people want
animals to be treated as humanly as possible. "One particular example affects many individuals a
day is that of deer getting run over by vehicles," is a good point, but his word choice is confusing
and makes a logical point seem feeble. A

Why School Report Cards Merit A Failing Grade Essay
Introduction The purpose of this paper is to serve as a critique of the education brief entitled, "Why
School Report Cards Merit a Failing Grade," written by Kenneth R. Howe and Kevin Murray of The
University of Colorado Boulder for the National Education Policy Center. The purpose of the brief
was to examine the practice by state governments of developing school accountability ratings
systems, which rate schools across their respective states with an A–F, report card–style grade as a
form of institutional accountability in the public domain. The authors of the brief were attempting to
highlight some of the purported reasons behind the creation of these systems and systematically
critique those arguments to demonstrate the failing of these accountability systems to meet their
intended purposes. The primary analysis comes from examining the A–F systems for validity across
three areas; validity as a measure of school quality, validity as a policy instrument, and validity in
terms of providing a democratic framework for measuring student success.
Summary
Howe and Murray begin their analysis with an overview of the background related to A–F grading
systems in the United States, which use a variety of student data ranging from standardized test
scores and growth levels to student attendance and graduation rates to evaluate a school's success or
failure as an institution. According to the authors, A–F grading systems create three types of
accountability, direct or bureaucratic,

Confidentiality Debate
Debate
Imagine being backed into a corner and your opponent is closing ground. Right now you're sweating
trying to think of how you can escape. You have no weapons, no hands, you have nothing but your
mouth. Would you be successful or just another victim, the most likely scenario is the ladder.
Today's generation is quick to use violence to resolve issues instead of using their words, and i am
inclined to believe that it has to do with the fact that they do not know how to have a civilized
debate. This is where debate comes into play, debate is when you argue against an opponent trying
to prove that your right and your opponent is wrong. I have been in debate almost my entire
highschool term and i can honestly say that debate has gotten me out of many sticky situations for
the simple fact i knew how to talk to someone and get my point across. I remember when i was in a
debate and the topic was, is "Urban Transit" a necessity in rundown neighborhoods. I was on the
affirmative side, the side which is for the plan and my opponent asked would I be willing to ride the
bus with convicts and criminals. Now everyone's initial answer should ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Topicality debate is when the debate goes from facts to definitions this is by far the hardest form of
debate because every word comes into play and you have to know the right definition I can think of
many times where I completely beat my opponent on the definitions of there, they're or their. You
would be surprised how many people don't know the difference. Now you're probably thinking what
does that have to do with arguing but the truth is it has everything to do with it. If you don't know
the right definitions how can you even argue someone. It's like trying to tell someone that the sky is
blue we might know it's blue but if they truly believe it's a different color then there is no

James Clark 's Article, Without Evidence Or Argument
In Kelly James Clark's Article "Without Evidence or Argument", Clark argues that belief in God,
does not require the support of evidence or argument in order for it to be rational. Clark's argument
is against W.K. Clifford's article "The Ethics of Belief", in which Clifford claims that everything
must be believed only on the basis of sufficient evidence (139). Throughout Kelly Clark's article he
states many things that support his conclusion of belief without evidence or argument, however, my
paper will only discuss what Clark says on p.139 starting with the paragraph "The first problem with
Clifford's..." and the following paragraph, ending with the words "...to see why."
Clark begins his article by giving examples of situation that align ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Clifford's universal demand for evidence he states that you base all of your beliefs on evidence
(138). Clark utilizes this premise to restate the argument in which he will eventually will give
reasoning to why the claim is false. In the article he foreshadows the problem with Clifford's
demand for evidence by saying, " No one would disagree: some beliefs require evidence for their
rational acceptability. But all beliefs in every circumstance?"(139) Clark is somewhat supporting the
demand for evidence. However, he does not find it rational to believe that evidence is required in
every situation.
This leads us to our next premise, premise II, which states there are rational beliefs that are not
supported by sufficient evidence. Clark identifies these rational beliefs as those acquired through
sensory experience and beliefs that are self–evident. He supports this premise by giving examples of
some of these beliefs "..The sky is blue, grass is green .."(139). He goes on to say, " ...every
proposition is either true or false.."(139). I think that by Clark including these examples of beliefs
through sensory experiences and self–evidence, he seems to be saying that through our experiences,
one can acquire beliefs even if our beliefs are false. It is rational to believe that the sky is blue
because it is a belief we acquire through seeing the sky is blue. But according to Clark, seeing that
the sky is blue is not enough sufficient evidence (like the sufficient

Article Review : Is Google Making Us Stupid By Nicholas Carr
Technology is quickly becoming a huge part of day to day life for nearly everyone. If you walk
around most places, you will see a large percent of people either on their cell phones, on their
computers, or using some other electronic device. While some of it is being used for business and
other important things, most of the time, it is more for entertainment. It is because of this that people
claim that technology is changing the way people think today. In his article "Is Google making us
stupid", Nicholas Carr argues that people have become dependent upon the internet for information
rather than having to work to figure it out. In the article "Does texting effect writing", Michaela
Cullington argues that people's texting is effecting the way people write because people don't show
emotion when texting, so that is translating back into their writing. Both arguments are effective,
both appeal to emotion, but the more effective argument is Carr's because it is a more sound
argument based on logic and credibility. One of the biggest differences in the two articles is the
credibility of the two authors. Carr is a proven writer having written for the New York Times, Wall
Street Journal, and has also written many blogs in his time. He has also published many writings of
his own prior to writing this article. Based on all of that evidence, Carr is a very credible source,
whereas Cullington on the other hand, is a very inexperienced writer. At the time when she wrote
this

The Future Like Ours Don Marquis Analysis
An Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses of FLO in Don Marquis's "An Argument that Abortion is
Wrong"
Don Marquis in his article "An Argument that Abortion is Wrong" sets forth an argument that,
except in rare cases, abortion is wrong. Two of Marquis's main points against abortion are The
"Future Like Ours" Account for the Wrongness of Killing and The Appeal to Cases Argument. In
these sections of his article, Marquis argues that killing anyone, including a fetus, is wrong when it
robs that individual of the opportunity to have a "future like ours" (FLO). Marquis argues in The
"Future Like Ours" Account for the Wrongness of Killing that "[p]remature death is a misfortune, in
general, because it deprives an individual of a future of value." (Marquis 755) A "Future Like Ours"
is described by Marquis as the opportunity to have a future of value. Every individual should hves
the opportunity to have a future of value, thus one issue of abortion is whether fetuses should be
allowed to have a "future like ours". Marquis does state the level of misfortune varies between
different deaths because of the underlying premise of being deprived of a future conscious life. To
show the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marquis could have included a few internal summaries of cause and effect to make his arguments
more apparent to the common reader. If at the end of each important section he had ended by clearly
explaining his reasoning, his logical sequence would have been clearer. The issue of abortion should
have been highlighted with greater detail throughout the article to put more emphasis on the central
theme of the argument. With this addition, it would have shown how each sub–point tied into to the
argument against abortion. Marquis's argument against abortion is logically and irrefutably sound
because of his argument that fetuses should have the right to a "future like

When Did Socrates Respond To Meno's Paradox?
In the Meno, Socrates took on a problematic discussion with meno about virtue. The discussion
started by meno as he claimed to know what virtue really is but he failed to find an exact definition
after he was questioned by Socrates. Meno concluded that he and Socrates don't really know the
meaning, but together they can grasp the true definition of virtue. In this paper I will discuss the
result of this discussion which is meno's paradox by defining the three premises which it consist
from and relating each to an example. Moreover I will be answering the following questions: what is
meno's paradox? How did Socrates respond to the paradox? Finally I will evaluate the paradox
according to validity and soundness.
Meno's paradox which is also known as the paradox of inquiry is made of three premises. The first
premise is that if you know something you cannot inquire about this thing or learn it again. The
second premise is that if you don't know something it's impossible to inquire about it or to learn it.
The third and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For an argument to be valid it should have a logical conclusion for a sequential premises, and based
on an assumption that the premises are true the conclusion must be true [1]. Moreover the soundness
of the argument depend on its validity and that all the premises are true.
When examining Meno's paradox and its premises any one can conclude that the third premise is a
logical conclusion for the first two premises, and assuming the truthfulness of the first two this lead
to true third premise. Since if a person cannot relearn a thing which he attain foreknowledge about
and he cannot learn anything that he don't knew before, this logically lead us to the third premise
which implies that inquiry is either unnecessary or impossible. After proving the validity of the
paradox it is worthy now for further scrutiny in order to evaluate its

GS- Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs or under NYSE listed as GS is a U.S bank holding company known for a strong
investment bank. It consults companies on mergers and acquisitions, provides trading services, and
manages equities on large corporations, governments and wealthy clients. Goldman Sachs invests its
capital to pursue in long–term (private equity) and short–term investments (propriety trading).
The statement on "More regulation is better than less" reflects the impact a financial institution
experiences under certain circumstances. Firstly, we look at both pros and cons on why financial
regulations were implemented.
More Regulation
Speaking on the behalf of Goldman, for example, rules and regulations can interpolate Goldman
Sachs proprietary trading, hedge fund and private equity investment and tax the company money
straight. We assumed extra or multiplied regulation can cause bank to vary its operation or cause it
to bear penalties. As well as any prosecution in proprietary trading and in any trades where there is a
material conflict of interest will be avoided from all holding banks. Stuff on high–risk exposure
assets or high–risk trading plans will be prohibited. Reasons why all financial institutions are
heavily regulated and supervised by various different units of governments (both federal and state
levels) to cover the following and I state the few importance likely exercising of trust powers,
formation of holding and mergers, quantity and quantity of loan and services as well as

The Sorites Paradox And The Epistemic View
solution to it.
The Sorites Paradox begins with the problem that if one looks at a vague term such as a heap, at
what point is it no longer a heap if you keep taking grains of sand out of it. The same can be said for
cattle, if one keeps removing cattle from a herd when will it no longer be a herd. The Sorites
Paradox is paradoxical because all the premises appear to be true as well as the argument being valid
(the conclusion really follows from the premises); yet the conclusion appears to be false. In which
case there must be a problem with one of the premises in order for the conclusion to be false,
however it is very difficult to see which premise is false. One proposed solution to the problem is
the Epistemic view.
There are two versions of the argument the many–premise version and the two–premise version.
The keys steps in the many–premise version of the Sorites Paradox are as follows:
(MPS) (1) 1,000,000 grains of sand make a heap; (2) If 1,000,000 grains of sand make a heap, then
1,000,000 – 1 (= 999,999) grains of sand make a heap;
So
(3) 999,999 grains of sand make a heap.
(Morris, 2016)
The argument begins with 1,000,000 grains of sand which can obviously be seen as a heap. One
grain of sand is subtracted each time e.g 1,000,000 – 1 = 999,999 grains of sand, with the conclusion
following that 999,999 grains of sand make a heap. This seems a valid argument as the conclusion
follows from the premises and it is clear that 999,999 grains of sand being

Examining Different Arguments Related to the Choice of a...
Title Examining Different Arguments Related to the Choice of a Career
Assessment Part A: Critically Evaluating an Argument
Build your mindmap.
Arts and Sciences (Advantage): Lots of flexibility in career choices: Logically Sound
Arts and Sciences (Disadvantage): Leads to a career in food service – 'Do you want fries with that?':
Irrational Appeal
Education (Advantage): The best way to make a difference in the world: Oversimplifying
Education (Disadvantage): Guaranteed low paying job: Either/Or Thinking
Nursing (Advantage): People always will need nurses: Oversimplifying
Nursing (Disadvantage): Too much schooling (according to Theo, the Law student): Double
Standard
Information Systems and Technology (Advantage): ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Describe what those errors were, and what made them errors.
Overgeneralization was used often. This was the main error with the argument. There were many
facts missing and much of the information was oversimplified. This was because many pieces of
information were missing for someone to be able to decide upon a career field.
What about errors of validity? Remember, these are errors in reasoning – and they're a little harder
to understand! Tell me if there are any errors of validity in this argument.
The manner in which the information was given to me constitutes errors of validity. The students
were trying to help me find the information that would help me select the major of my choice. The
information was presented in a biased view point, encouraging me to pick their fields.
Revise the argument so that it removes all errors. Restate it in a way that is logically sound.
Once I revised the argument, it was easiest for me to determine that one should consider all of the
questions they have when they are deciding on a certain field of work. The Health and Human
Service field solves problems and figures out how to deal with situations in the best way for
everyone. A person entering into this field would be able to see the tangible results of their help once
they have completed a degree and begun working.
Take a little more time on this one. What it was that led you to choose this degree concentration.
Describe both about how you evaluated the

Is Hack's Unauthorized Computer Entry Morally Wrong?
As the world becomes ever more involved within the digital realm, it is important to asses acts that
may be morally questionable. Such acts like that of a hacker, Hack, and her unauthorized intrusion
into a hospital database done purely for personal pleasure. It is my goal to prove that doing so is
morally wrong. The proponent of this act, Mickey Soft, lists it as morally permissible for the
following reasons: Hack's unauthorized computer entry is not morally wrong If (1) is true, then not
all unauthorized computer entries are morally wrong Therefore, not all unauthorized computer
entries are morally wrong Line (1) proposes that since Hack's intrusion into the patient database is
done purely for her own amusement, that of gauging her skills, and not for ill purposes, it is not
morally wrong. Furthermore, the intrusion caused no harm to anyone as Hack did not read, alter, or
save any part of the database. She left the security settings of the database and its contents as is. No
one was aware of her intrusion nor will anyone find out. Given the arguments presented for line (1),
line (2) logically follows such that not all unauthorized computer entries are morally wrong. In
assessing the argument, it can be said that it is a valid argument since the conclusions logically
follow from the arguments given they are true. There are many possible objections to Mickey's
argument. I will point out three. In this particular case, the proponent raises the point (in line 1)

Essay on Socrates and Epicurus
Many people seem to fear death, but philosophers such as Socrates and Epicurus would argue that
one has no reason to fear it. Socrates sees death as a blessing to be wished for if death is either
nothingness or a relocation of the soul, whereas Epicurus argues that one shouldn't worry
themselves about death since, once we are gone, death is annihilation which is neither good nor bad.
Epicurus believes that death itself is a total lack of perception, wherein there is no pleasure or pain. I
agree with Epicurus because Socrates doesn't give a sound argument for death as a blessing, whereas
Epicurus' argument is cogent. I would also argue personally that death is not something to be feared
because, like Epicurus, I see no sufficient evidence ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That might not be considered a blessing by some. Socrates doesn't seem to address this issue, but he
does provide further support for his second and third premises.
Socrates argues that if death is nothingness or a lack of perception, it can be likened to a dreamless
sleep. Everyone enjoys a dreamless sleep because one wakes up refreshed. Therefore, since a
dreamless sleep is so pleasant, it could be considered a blessing. Socrates argues that nothingness is
like a dreamless sleep because they are both a lack of perception, so one can conclude that death is a
blessing because "all eternity would then seem to be no more than a single night" (Apology (1981)
40e.)
One might argue that Socrates can't assume that a dreamless sleep is counted among the most
pleasurable of nights and days. I think that Socrates would reply that this is a reasonable assumption
since, at times other than dreamless sleep, our body is carrying various perceptions of the senses for
the mind to sort out. A lack of perception in which the mind is not inundated with so many messages
could certainly be counted a great pleasure. Shakespeare's Hamlet would argue that in fact death is a
sleep full of dreams. "For in that sleep of death what dreams may come when we have shuffled off
this mortal coil, must give us pause" (Shakespeare (1970) Scene 3, act 1, line 66–68.) Hamlet sees a
never–ending sleep full of dreams as extremely pleasant, but these

Blaise Pascal The Wager Argument
Elsy Cruz
Professor Tony Roy
Phil 192
10/7/17
Pascal Paper
French physicist and mathematician, Blaise Pascal, had a set of notes found after his death. These
notes would then be collected, compiled, and printed into "The Wager". "The Wager" is a
philosophical argument that aims the reader to vindicate the reasonings of God's existence rather
than not believing in god's creation at all. Even assuming that God's existence is improbable, the
likely benefits of believing in God are extensive in regards to the benefits and infinite gains that are
believed to be achieved, unlike not believing in God. Pascal concluded that it is most rational to take
trust and shelter within religious views (r–views) rather than other minor insignificant and lowly
views such as Atheist views (a–views) and dumb views (d–views).
To analyze this argument we must first have an understanding of the argument for validity. An
argument is logically valid if and only if there is no consistent story in which the premises are true
and the conclusion is false. If an argument is not valid it is then invalid. To be aware whether an
argument or pair of sentences are valid, we make use of the validity test. To prove this consistency,
we must follow these effortless elements– (a) List premises with negation of conclusion, (b) Show
that no consistent story "hits target" from (a), (c) Apply definition of validity, and (d) Apply
definition of soundness. For example, let's assess these next couple of statements that

Validity And Difference Between Soundness And False Arguments
An argument is sound if it is valid and has true premises. However, without knowing the definition
and differences between soundness and validity how could anyone know what that means?
The definition of soundness guarantees that the conclusion will be true. Validity is if the truth of the
premises logically infers that the conclusion is true. Validity is more inferential, whereas soundness
is straight to the point. Many people have a tendency to equate true arguments with sound arguments
and invalid arguments with false arguments. This is because it logically makes sense. Textbooks, the
internet, and other resources emphasize the fact that soundness is parallel with true and invalid
arguments are associated with false arguments because resources discussing this topic highlight the
fact that the premises do not lead to the conclusion. This ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The statement. The statement Zack Brown is Vice President of the United States is false, and lastly
the conclusion; So, Zack Brown must be 35 years of age is true. The logic is valid but it is not
sound. In order for an argument to be sound its premises have to be true. However, one false
premise classifies the premises as false even if one is true. Therefore, the argument is unsound. In
conclusion, argument one is unsound because it is not possible for a invalid argument to be sound.
An argument is sound if and only if it is valid and there are true premises. Argument one does not
have true premises nor is it valid. Argument 2 is also unsound because even though the logic is valid
the premises are false. This shows that arguments one and two are more similar then it seemed
originally. There is a lot more to validity and soundness then a definition; there are requirements that
help make an effective

Google Making USupid Logos
In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" (2008), Nicholas Carr maintains that the advent of the Internet
has produced a shallow generation of information customers who lack the ability to deeply engage
with and critically think about a text. To support the argument, Carr draws on personal and historical
anecdotes and one scientific study. The purpose of Carr's article is to open a dialogue about the
potentially adverse effects the Internet could have on humans' cognitive processes. Carr establishes
an informal relationship with the audience, who are generally well–educated, upper–middle class
individuals. Because the audience is educated, they are very capable of critically thinking. However,
Carr's use of other rhetorical strategies disarms them and detracts from the dearth of logos. His essay
is rife with numerous unfounded premises, poor evidence, and logical fallacies. Because of this lack
of logos is in a way compensated by including numerous appeals to ethos and pathos, the audience
is likely to find the article persuasive unless they re–read the article deeply with a critical lens. Carr's
thesis is founded on two main premises: first, the population's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The study has several validity issues: first, there was no control group, nor was there a pre–test. This
means that there was no baseline to compare the results to, nor was there a control group to
determine if the change was a result of the variable in question (the Internet). Second, the study only
examined journal databases, which are frequented by students and researchers more often than the
general population. Therefore, the sample is not representative of the general population and the
results cannot be generalized to the broader population, which Carr did. Because this
methodologically unsound study was the only one he cited, it is evident the essay lacks logos.
Therefore, the first premise cannot stand from a logical

Clooney Clinton And Useless Soft Outrage Analysis
In light of the recent attack in Paris, many leaders around the world have united in the defense for
free speech and freedom of religion. A few of those leaders (George Clooney, Michelle Obama,
Hillary Clinton, David Cameron, and Mark Zuckerburg) have united in their star–statuses to raise
awareness of terrors such as: Darfur's plight and bringing back the 200 kidnaped girls in Chibok,
Nigeria. In the article, "Clooney, Clinton, and Useless 'Soft Outrage'," author S.E. Cupp attempts to
make an argument regarding her opinion that, "... "awareness" alone will not end the genocide there
–– only force will" (par.15). Although Cupp is very logical, a credible author, a political
commentator, and super organizational, she does not make an effective ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Cupp has coined the term "soft outrage" in her essay, specifically, "...mere symbolism and
solidarity" (par. 7). She is criticizing all the celebrities she mentions in her essay, saying they are
simply going online and talking about the problems, but not taking action to solve them, when she is
doing the exact same thing. All she has done is go online and post an essay complaining about how
no one is doing anything, except going online and hashtagging, to solve the problems arising in the
Middle East. The final sentence in S.E. Cupp's essay reads, "Are they ready to back up their rhetoric
with action" (par. 22)? Although Cupp is self–confident in her thinking that force is the only answer
to our problems, she has once again, contradicted herself. She, throughout her entire essay, never
once backed up her own rhetoric with action. She hid behind her keyboard, and criticized others by
giving off a snide, conceited tone throughout the entire essay. Her "argument" was weak, and never
once

Mother Hens Cluck: Cellphones Support Learning
Out of the two blog posts I would say that "Mother Hens Cluck: Cellphones Support Learning" has
a stronger argument. To start, the soundness of reasoning is better, the number reasons that make
sense are more than "Trust your gut: Blog Post From a High School Athlete." They both have three
logical reasons but, the number of reasons that are with solid evidence Mother hen has more.
Another reason is, the fraction number of reasons that are well supported with solid evidence. She
has ⅔ and he has ⅓, she also had good reliable sources and so did the other article; but overall I
think from everything I've read I would say that "Mother Hens Cluck: Cellphones Support
Learning" has better reasons than article two because "Trust your gut: Blog

vicki hearne vs peter singer comparison essay
A quick comparison to Vicki Hearne's "What's Wrong with Animal Rights?" to Peter Singer's
"Speciesism and Moral Status", might indicate Hearne's argument is stronger due to her strategic
and effective use of emotional appeals (i.e. pathos). These appeals allow Hearne to connect quickly
and easily with her audience. Hearne is also quite clever in terms of stressing her occupation as an
animal trainer. However, after a swift comparison of the two articles, it is evident that Singer's
"Speciesism and Moral Status" offers readers a stronger and more valid argument. Both Singer and
Hearne are arguing their position on animal rights and the extent of human involvement. Since
Hearne's article is primarily based on her attempt to persuade her ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
She even goes to label the Humane Society "the pound, the place with the decompression chamber
or the lethal injections." (61) as she attempts to influence the readers emotional side.
In "Speciesism and Moral Status", Peter Singers argument is that when it comes to the value of life,
we should not discriminate in regards to species, and cognitive ability should play some role in
moral status. In comparison to humans with "profound mental disabilities" (Singer 569), the use of
the gorilla Koko's higher IQ score, not needing constant supervision, or border collies being able to
provide useful work to society, serves as a strong logos appeal regarding the relationship between
cognitive ability and moral status. Singer is effectively able to support his claims by continuously
referencing respected philosophers and individuals such as Immanuel Kant, Jeremy Bentham, and
even Pope John Paul II. Validity and integrity are very much solidified in Singers article with the use
of counter arguments as well as alternate views to his own arguments. The structure and information
Singer provides is clear and organized, and does not leave his audience confused due to the strong
use of factual, relevant support of his argument.
In Vicki Hearne's article, some may agree with the argument she makes as her pathos appeal may be
sufficient in engaging with the

Ethical Relativism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Victoria Burke

More from Victoria Burke (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Ethical Relativism