Prayer Should Not Be Allowed In Public Schools

Prayer Should Not Be Allowed In Public Schools
Not During School Hours What's the harm in an occasional spoken prayer at school every now and
then? Are times such as an assembly, sporting event, or graduation acceptable? The debate of prayer
in public schools has been an ongoing issue for over fifty years now. It seems like a simple yes or no
answer. As a Christian who attended a private school, my initial answer was a definite "yes." I have
always believed that God should be present in every school all over the world mainly because my
school's activities were centered around prayer. However, after much research, I have found a
different point of view. Prayer should not be allowed in public schools due to the fact that these
schools consist of numerous religions, it is unconstitutional, and it creates different burdens for each
person in the school. Prayer should not be allowed in public schools because more than just
Christians attend these schools. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an article titled, "The Dangers of Religious Instruction in Public Schools," a Wisconsin State
Supreme Court justice noted, "There is no such source and cause of strife, quarrel, fights, malignant
opposition, persecution, and war, and all evil in the state, as religion. Let it once enter our civil
affairs, our government would soon be destroyed. Let it once enter our common schools, they would
be destroyed." (Gaylor). In all actuality, the Supreme Court does not have a set rule that the students
can't pray while they are at school, but it is set that the school itself can't hold religious assemblies
(Strauss). Both Gaylor and Strauss agree that this separation is important. Public schools are funded
and controlled by the government. If religion were placed back in the schools it, too, would be
controlled by the government. It would soon not hold the same value that it does while it is separate
from the school
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Prayer In Public Schools Essay
America is a very diverse country, and it is very important that all of our public school's respect
student's beliefs. Praying is a very important part of faith in most religion beliefs. Not allowing
students to pray would be unconstitutional. It is also written in the First Amendment the right of
freedom of speech, we as Americans should be allowed to pray in school. Students also have the
right to pray under protected guidelines that have been set by the Supreme Court. This country was
also built on freedom to practice any religion.
It has been misled that praying in public school is not allow and it is forbidden. The truth is students
are allow to pray on their own. What cause this misleading fact was a case in 1962 Engel v. Vitale.
When ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Schemp the Supreme Court had made additional ruling dealing with prayer in public schools. The
court had ruled that it is unconstitutional for sponsored Bible reading and to recite the Lord's Prayer.
In these cases, the Supreme Court decisions never removed prayer from public schools. The court
only took out government sponsored worship.
In 1990 the Supreme Court ruled that students are allow to form clubs that permits them to meet
during "non–instructional" time to pray. The Students are also allowed to read their biblical
literature and discuss their faith with other students within the group. Several schools now offer
Religion studies, Bible Literature, and Role of Religion in History for students. Public Schools can
offer these classes as long as it is non–devotional and presents no constitutional problems.
In 1995 guidelines were sent to every school by the Supreme Court. The guidelines state that
students have the right to pray and discuss any religion view to other students. Students are allowed
to discuss their views, as long as they are not being disruptive. However, the guidelines still state
that public schools have no right to force or pressure students to pray. Public Schools are also not
allowed to perform sponsoring worship, pressure students to read religious literature, or be involved
in ant religious functions. These guidelines are common sense, however for some reason it's not

Prayer in Public School Essay
In the heart of every religion, there is a way to express one's deepest thoughts and feelings––prayer.
Prayer is something that most people due naturally. Whether it is in the morning before you start
your day, before a meal, before you go to sleep, or when you just feel the need to express your
feelings, prayer is always there. Religious faiths believe that this is central to human life. Even those
who are not religious pray. Prayer affects the material universe. Prayer can be defined as an earnest
request; a humble entreaty addressed to God, to a god, etc (Webster's). We are allowed to pray
publicly anywhere, as long as we don't pray out loud. Yet we all live in a society that does not allow
prayer inside public schools. Prayer is also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Students are also free to organize Bible study and other religious interest clubs if any other secular
clubs are allowed. Religious clubs must be given the same access to the schools facilities. Group
meetings also must be "voluntary and student initiated." Students can also engage in a "moment of
silence" during which they can pray, meditate, plan their day, or engage in any other silent mental
activity (Religioustolerance). Religious freedom is one of the most important traditions and
constitutional rights that we as Americans have.
Throughout the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s public education across the United States continued to
include considerable religious context. In colonial New England the earliest standard text was the
New England Primer, which taught younger children to read and count using biblical references:
The letter A was taught with the phrase "In Adam's Fall we sinned all," and P was illustrated with
"Peter denies His Lord and cries" (Andryszewski 13–14). Beginning around 1913 and continuing
through the first half of the twentieth century, state governments across the country decided to
standardize and write into law the practice of Bible reading and prayer in their states' public schools.
By mid– century, nearly all of the states permitted some form of Bible reading or formal prayer in
public schools. By the 1950's school prayer was commonly practiced

Persuasive Essay On Prayer In School
Prayer in School has been one of the most controversial issues of all the time. Under US constitution
also prayer in schools is constitutional as well as unconstitutional. "Congress shall make no law
respecting as establishment of religious or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition
the government for a redress of grievance", first amendment of US constitution. This amendment
guarantees people for their freedom of religious and speech of their choice. It means an individual
has a right to follow their religious without violating other belief. As an atheist, I believed that
Prayer is a mind exercise to keep balance between subconscious and conscious mind. And, a prayer
in School will give a guideline t People have their right to follow the religious of their own choice.
They can practice any norms or values under their religious without violating other belief. In 60s,
prayer in school was common in America. But, sometimes catholic group objected because it
violates their belief. Since, everyone has only one faith but there is different ways to express their
faith on their own God. In school, student with different religious has their own way and own God
to pray. Prayer that we pray in school may come from one religious which may violate others belief.
On June 25, 1962, US Supreme court ruled against prayer in public school. (Engel v. Vitale case)

Should Prayer Be Allowed? School?
Research has found that there is a correlation between those that feel the federal government is too
powerful and those that would agree that prayer should be allowed in school. On the flip side to that
those that feel the government does not have enough power and tend to disagree with pear being
allowed in school. Based off articles researched and statistics gathered as well summarized it can be
determined that those that are of the conservative and or republican party tend to feel that the
government should not have a say in prayer in school. This may be because of religious preference
or their belief that government should not have enough power to interfere in the religious beliefs of
citizens. The flipside to that is that those on the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most individuals on the liberal spectrum tend to agree with the courts when it declared government
sponsored prayers are unconstitutional. The less conservative individuals show a tendency to believe
that any amendment that allows for voluntary prayer would contradict the first amendment
guarantee against government establishment of religion. Most on the liberal spectrum or those that
feel the government does not have enough power feel that any sort of Government action to allow
voluntary prayer in schools could be at the cost of the civil rights of students. It is believed that any
amendment or law consenting for voluntary prayer would diminish the very heart of the Bill of
Rights; which protects the rights of people from the oppression from the majority. Those that do not
allow or want to allow prayer in school think that any amendment affirming that prayer should be
allowed in school would actually introduce assembled prayer or force persons into prayer. Those
that clash with prayer in school fear that judgement against those that do not participate in school
prayer. Those in the small percentage that do not want to participate would be obligated to follow to
a belief or ritual that which they do not believe. This could cause the individual to suffer the
humiliation or burden of submitting a day–to–day spiritual exercise continuously in order to avoid
being singled out by mainstream colleagues and educators. Grafton, C., &

The Psalms Function As A School Of Prayer
Introduction
For almost two thousand years, the Psalms were essential to the devotional practice of the Christian
church, teaching the believer to pray in response to the living God, a confession of praise and glory
to the Almighty God. Thus, when the contemporary church thus that she is joining a large group of
people that for nearly thirty centuries based their prayers and worship in those ancients words. In
Eugene H. Peterson's view, there is no other place where can be seen such a deeply and detailed
form, of the human dimension in the Bible history as in the Psalms.
The aim of this paper is to analyze how the Psalms should be used in the church today. For that, this
study is divided into three parts: First, the Psalms and Prayer, where will be discussed how the book
of Psalms function as a school of prayer. Second, Christians and the use of the Psalms, in this topic
will be highlighted how Christians can find Jesus in the Psalms. Finally, putting into practice is a
topic that will explain the value and the need of using the Psalm in the church.
The Psalms and Prayer
The Psalter was the school that Israel and the church appealed to learn how to pray, which along
with Isaiah was the most cited book by Jesus and the apostles in the New Testament. For the first
Christians the rules were, "be filled with the Spirit, speaking to one another with psalms." Thus, as
their Jewish fathers listened to the Word of God through the Psalms its instructions and laments

Prayer In Schools
Prayer is an important aspect of religion. Many religions incorporate prayer as a form of worship.
Many people around the world worship by praying daily. People feel the need to worship through
their religion by the use of prayer every day. Prayer in public places such as schools should be
allowed for a variety of reasons. First off, school prayer is defined as a state–sanctioned or
mandatory prayer by students in public schools (Phillips page 1). Based on this definition, it is
logical that mandated prayer in schools can be considered school prayer. In modern society, in the
United States of America, mandated prayer in schools is prohibited (Phillips page 1). Ever since
1962, school prayer is not allowed (Phillips page 1). However, there are many beneficial advantages
and reasons to why this prohibition should be undone. The first reason that prayer should be allowed
in schools is that prayer shows solidarity (Phillips page 1). This example is especially ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In modern America, showing expression is encouraged. People express themselves in different ways
and it is accepted. In fact, students and people show expression through a variety of ways including
speech, poetry, and song (Lipka page 1). Prayer is another way that people show expression.
Students use prayer to express themselves and many students do it in unique ways. Schools allow
students to express themselves in many different ways including reciting poetry, memorizing a
speech, and playing a musical instrument (Lipka page 1). So, why can't students express themselves
through prayer? Also, prayer gives students additional opportunities to convey there religious
beliefs. For example, if a student uses prayer in a meaningful way, it can benefit other aspects of
school (Lipka page 1). Prayer can be a very important part of a student's life. Prayer gives students
the opportunity to

Prayer In Public Schools Research Paper
Prayers in public schools? This is a big topic in most of the worlds in today society. People need to
remember that it is a public school and many people do attend them and it's their choice to attend
those schools. Me personally I feel they school be allowed! just like the pledge of allegiance. Some
kids have different races and believe in different beliefs then most Americans today. We still allow
these different regions into the United States to be a part of the American society so for them to
believe that we would have to change or correct what we believe in is a messy situation. But as of
today will still don't prayer in public schools systems, in less it is a catholic school system. But I can
see that we can't be selfish among our self and the religions of others. If we was to having prayers in
public school there ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If there was more schools that's was built just around their religion they would want prayers to take
part in their learning day. According to www.au.org the government says no prayers in but it does
not say they cannot take part in prayers on their own time in school, I believe that could work too.
Some people might look at this as bending the rules of the public school system but I think they
should always praise god in any setting if they feel the praises are needed to their higher power.
Another views on this could is some people might get bully for praying in school but I think if more
people was influence to the higher power they wouldn't be bulling the kids it like videos game that
have violence act's in them people or younger adult are more susceptible to them violent behaviors
in in the public this is according to www.nydailynews.com. So I believe that if religion was in
forced public schools the success would be a lot better in students believe prayer to your gods do
work in life and in

Supporting Prayer in Public Schools Essay
"Our Father..." Denied For centuries, the debate has existed whether or not to allow prayer in public
schools. Many Americans feel it is not right of the schools to teach religion. With all the diversity
associated with the United States, public schools cannot select one standard religion to practice, due
to the cultural and religious differences in the country. Not only are schools the storm center of
controversy involving religious differences, they are the principal institution charged with
transmitting the identity and mission of the United States from one generation to the next. If we fail
in our school policies and classrooms to model and to teach how to live with differences, we
endanger our experiment in religious liberty and our ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Prayer should be recited only in the privacy of one's own head or home. To allow individual prayer
at one's own choice is legal. To mandate standard prayer is illegal. The good thing about this is one
can choose to pray, or not, to whatever God they choose. Therefore someone praying to Allah,
Buddha, or Satan cannot require a Christian or a Jew to participate. Atheists have the right to choose
not to participate. A teacher or a government official cannot stop someone from praying silently.
Public schools are for all children, regardless of their race, sex, or religion. Schools are supported by
all taxpayers. The U.S. Supreme Court has replaced freedom of religion, guaranteed by the
Constitution, for freedom from religion. To ban school prayer diminishes the religious freedom of
students who would like to pray and forces them to act according to the dictates of a non–religious
minority. School prayer would result in many societal benefits. The public school system is
tragically disintegrating as evidenced by the rise in school shootings, increasing drug use,
alcoholism, teen pregnancy, and HIV transmission. School prayer can help combat these issues,
would instill a sense of morality and is desperately needed to protect our children. The issues of
prayer in the school system used to be on the back burner but now it has been moved upstage, front
and center. The discussion of a school prayer amendment is not so much about prayer itself but
more about what kind of prayer

Religious Prayer Within Public Schools
Religious prayer within public schools has been a heated debate for many years and ultimately has
caught national attention. Overtime many court cases have challenge this issue. The Constitution
itself is on the fence of religious prayer because of the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause
which prohibits the government's involvement with the freedom of exercise of religion. The policy
of religious prayer within Mississippi public schools is a state policy level. In the year of 2013,
Governor Phil Bryant of Mississippi signed a bill/law that protects voluntary prayers from students
on public school property and other public property. This policy also protects student prayers at
public school related events such as praying over public school intercoms, at assemblies, and
sporting events. In addition, the policy allows students to openly discuss their faith with classrooms
and permits students to establish organizations such as a bible club. To clarify, the term protection
does not imply that the law is promoting any religion or religious belief. However, it is against the
law for administration from public schools to lead a public school prayer.
Social Work Values and Ethics There are several social work values and ethics that are apparent in
this policy comes from the NASW code of ethics. From the NASW code of ethics, under the
heading discrimination 4.02 states," Social workers should not practice, condone, facilitate, or
collaborate with any form of

Persuasive Essay: Putting Prayer In Schools
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . " I believe that
people should be allowed to pray anywhere if they so choose, including in school. Putting prayer
back into schools is the best decision for students and society. Freedom of religion is a right that is
given to all American citizens and should not be taken away. This great country has given the gift of
religious tolerance, and people from other countries envy it. Putting these values back in place will
help change our society, laying a foundation for better principles and morals than that of today's
culture, and reducing violence in our society. Prayer in school is a choice that should be tolerated,
and not forced upon anyone. Those who choose to pray should not have that right taken away and
those who choose not to pray shouldn't be coerced into it by others. The First Amendment clearly
states people should not be prohibited to exercise their religion. Taking prayer out of schools is
completely against this First Amendment right and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Allowing prayer in schools will instill a sense of right and wrong in students along with moral
values. There will be less bullying, drug use, alcoholism, and teen pregnancy when students have
moral values. Being able to pray in school will help reduce the violence and mass shootings that
have increased because of diminished values. It is said that there have now been at least 62 mass
shootings in the past three decades, with 24 in the last seven years alone. When violence starts in
schools it flows out into culture and our whole society becomes poisoned by it. Young people have
become accepting and numb to the violence around them. When our young people are accepting of
violence, it will erode our

The Role Of Prayer In Public Schools
Throughout the United States, the religious rights of students are frequently being pushed to the
side. The majority of the religious rights being threatened belong to non–believers. Conservatives
often argue that it is a student's and teacher's right to pray in public schools, trying to persuade the
American public that they are truly concerned about the rights of the students. However, in all
reality, they truly do not care about the religious rights, but instead they care about power. Charles
C. Haynes, director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute, said it like this, "If
these fights and lawsuits were only about the right of kids to pray in school, advocates of "school
prayer" would have declared victory and gone ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Christians claimed in their argument that as long as a specific divine being is not mentioned in the
prayer said at school it does not violate the Establishment Clause; however, that is not the case.
Many religions do not believe a specific being or believe in praying to any type of divine being.
Therefore, praying in public schools, even not mentioning God, is still in violation of the
Establishment Clause due to the religions that believe in nothing. Secondly, one of their strongest
arguments was that moral decline in public schools was due to the absence of prayer. When they
make the statement that the rate of pregnancies, drug busts, and fights in public school systems are
inclining due to the absence of prayer they are committing a logical fallacy. They are making a
rather bold statement when saying that since prayer has been taking out of schools, the rate of
teenage pregnancies has steadily rose. This is a false analogy, also known as the cause and effect
fallacy. They assume that since one thing occurred (prayer being removed from schools) has caused
another event to occur (rise of immorality in schools). With this argument, they went too far and
completely lose their credibility. They cannot assume or expect the American public to believe that
the absence of

Today, in America, there still is the controversy about prayer in public schools. Many parents and
supporters of prayer, believed that schools and school districts that participate in prayers tend to
have students that are less prongs to get into trouble in school and trouble with the law. Most parents
believe if we had prayer in schools, we would have less problems with gangs, less violence in
school, bullying, sexting, better grades, and less drop–outs. They believe that students do not want
others to see them praying and turn around and get into trouble. This action will be considered as a
double standard. Even though many say that we cannot pray in schools, the courts also say that
public schools cannot interfere with students' rights ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She felt it was illegal for students to pray at school. She felt it was not separation of church and
state. Therefore, one lady challenged the system and it spread from there. The court supports the
idea of students praying but no school–sponsored prayers and not by school personnel but done by
the students. Not only did Ms. O'Hair speak out against prayer, there are other groups, with one of
them being the Civil Liberty group that monitors the actions of schools and other governmental
agencies to see if they are violating the Separation of church and state. This group also monitors
things such as prayer in government buildings or having the Ten Commandments posted in or on
government buildings. Some do not want religions or prayer in schools, however, a school can teach
a course in religion as long as it do not cater to any one religion. It is allowed to teach the content of
different religions as long as you are not trying to persuade students to any particular religion, the
course would be for content only. There are times when students request religion to be taught as an
elective subject. Therefore, the different religions must be the

Persuasive Speech On Prayer In School
¨Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come, your will be done, on
earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive our debts, as we also have
forgiven our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.¨ Saying this
phrase anytime proves that praying in any public school does not violate the Constitution. Does
praying in a school offend anyone? No, it doesn't. School Prayer is prayer that is considered
mandatory by students in public schools in the context of religious liberty. Depending on the
country or type of school, prayer may be permitted, prohibited, or required. On June 25, 1962, the
Supreme Court of the the United States decided in Engel v. Vitale that a prayer approved by the
New York Board of Regents for use in schools violated our Constitution because it represented
establishment of religion. Prayer is an integral part of life and should be allowed in public schools.
Prayer in school does not violate the constitution and is not carried out by clergy or promoting
a particular religion. According to Otis Kramer, author of the article and Matt Donnelly,
co–author of the article, ¨It is virtually universal, and is a key ingredient in teaching behavior to
children." (Points of View: School Prayer, March 1, 2016). Recognizing this fundamental truth
of human society in schools is far from advocating any particular religious belief system. It does
have the advantage of

The Argument In Favor Of Prayer In Public Schools
For many years, students in public education were familiar with prayer in school. However, after
this practice was challenged by parents in New York State, the Supreme Court ruled on June 26,
1962 that government–endorsed prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Many Americans still
disagree with this decision and believe in the importance of prayer in schools and that is the
constitutional right of every American. Some of the arguments in favor of prayer in public schools
are that it supports religious freedom in the United States, it acknowledges America's heritage, and it
offers benefits to all of society.
First of all, prayer in school supports the principle of religious freedom on which the United States
was founded. By banning school

Prayer In Public Schools
Lately, many Christians have come to feel they are being persecuted and denied their religious
rights, specifically the right to pray in public schools. They believe there is a direct correlation
between not allowing prayer in public schools and the problems that plague America. Maybe they
are right about the impact of prayer on America's issues, but they are misinformed to believe our
nation's problems are due to the lack of prayer in public schools. The truth is that school children
have always been allowed to pray in public schools, but their prayers cannot be coerced, guided or
influenced by public school employees. Restrictions on religious expression in schools apply to the
adults not the children and therein lies the rub.
It is hard

Film School Prayer: A Community At War
What is prayer? Prayer is defined as a solemn request for help or expression of thanks addressed to
God or object of worship. According to the film we watched in class "School prayer: A community
at War" daily prayer started being announced during 1978 on the intercom of a small high school
located in Pontotoc Mississippi. The film followed the story of a mother name Lisa who fights
against the Pontotoc school system where her children attended school. She believed there should be
a separation between school and religion. Throughout the film most of the citizen of Pontotoc
disagreed with Lisa and stated that she wasn't allowing them to practice their religious freedoms
which was proven not true through the Supreme Court. Lisa stated she wasn't trying to take prayer
away from anyone, she believed it was a violation of her children's rights as American citizen
because the prayer was done so openly at the public school.
I agreed with the mother in the previous situation that there should be limits on how much prayer is
taught in an institution. Furthermore, I believe that a child should be able to pray silently even, when
you can clearly tell that he/she is praying because it's protected within the First amendment. The
first Amendment of the U.S constitution states that every ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The child isn't using any form of culture imperialism to try and persuade other children that they
should pray in public therefore this child should be able to pray in peace. I don't view the child
praying in silent disturbing other children or changing their beliefs/ view point on religion. I just see
a child worshiping something he/she values and a relationship growing between the child and the
aspect he/she chose to worship. My belief is if a child is praying in silent and the only way others
know they are praying is by observing them let them pray because it's being handled in a private

High School Prayer
Previous to 1995, a student elected as Santa Fe High School's student council chaplain conveyed a
Prayer, described as overtly Christian, over the public address system before each home varsity
football
game. One Mormon and one Catholic family filed suit against this ritual and others under the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. While the suit was pending, the District embraced a
new policy, which allowed, but did not require, student–initiated and student– led prayer at all the
home
games and which approved two student elections, the first to decide whether prayers should be
delivered at games, and the second to select the speaker to convey them. After the students
authorized
Such prayers and selected a speaker, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The District petitioned for a writ of certiorari, claiming its policy did not disrupt the Establishment
Clause
because the football game messages was a private speech, not a public speech. The Court was not
convinced by the district's arguments, ruling that the student speech was not at all private. The
control
the school maintained over the usage of the student speech register government preference for
prayer.
In view of the history of religious rituals in the school district, the district's student election rule was
present to maintain the ritual of pre–game prayers. The Court also found that the voting factor used
by
the school to determine whether a prayer would be given and who would give it only worsened the

Establishment Clauses issues since the different religious groups within the school now became
rival
political factors. Voting for the speaker guaranteed not religious conflict, but also guaranteed that
the only
Religious groups that would be heard is the majority religion. These factors led the Court to find
that the district policy on pre–game
prayers resulted in both perceived and real validation of religion by the government, and

The Issue of School Prayer
The issue of school prayer has been a thorny one in the United States for many years now. In the
beginning of the nineteenth century readings of the Bible and prayer were common practices in
public schools. However prayer was banned in 1962 due to claims that it was violating the First
Amendment right that the government was not allowed to support religion, and from then on the
Supreme Court has ruled against any and all forms of prayer in schools. Schools cannot however
ban students from praying in school and it is against the law to deny a student of his or her own
personal beliefs. To this day prayers are said at special events such as ballgames, graduations, and
the daily moment of silence, but these are sometimes frowned upon because people find public
prayer offensive (At Issue: School Prayer). Praying in schools should be allowed for those who want
to do it because it should not be about pleasing those who do or don't have certain beliefs. It should
be up to the student to decide whether he or she wants to pray in school. Both religious and
nonreligious students should be allowed to coexist and not have to sacrifice religious practices so
satisfy the other. Arguments can be made in favor for both parties. The most important factor
though, to consider here is that the First Amendment still stands that everyone should have freedom
of religion whether they choose to take it or not. There is no possible way to determine whether or
not the absence of religion is at fault

The Issue of Prayer in Schools
Often, as was the case of the abolition of slavery in our country, it seems that courts ratified change
that had already occurred in the ethos of the national culture and consciousness of the nation after
the tide had already turned. This is the case with the issue of prayer in schools and the separation of
church and state in general.
As much as the history of court cases is good evidence for the separation of church and state and
with it the denial of prayer in schools, supporters of prayer in public schools can and do make the
argument that the intention of the Founding Father's of this nation was to form a nation centered
around prayer and Biblical instruction with it's accompanying values. Their understanding of
religious freedom was no doubt defined and acted out in the context of their culture and religious
influences. Courts of their day certainly did not push back against the integration of church and state
as we think of it today. Why else would the countries' oldest and now most prestigious institutions
have their roots founded in the preparation of clergy for religious work? Harvard, Yale and
Princeton, among other great universities, were actually built for the purpose of raising up educated
pastors. Use the david lose inside quote Proponents of prayer in schools will no doubt point to
reverse discrimination or infringement upon their own religious freedom if they or their children are
not allowed to express their faith by praying in public. With the

With Christ In The School Of Prayer Analysis
Requirement III. "With Christ in the School of Prayer" by Andrew Murray; Chapter Summarization.
Chapter 1: "The Only Teacher" Text: Luke 11:1 The Lord Jesus is the only teacher of true prayer
and of its strategies and pleas. He alone can show ous how to reach Heaven with our supplications.
He would know, having now been on both the sending and receiving end of prayer. When a person
wants to learn a profession, and wants to learn it to perfection, he does not go to his best friend, a
family member, or even a person who has any limit of experience in the matter. He finds the Master
of the said profession and learns of him until all that can be learned is learned. So it is with prayer.
We must go to Jesus, the Master of prayer, if we are to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We cannot love God as we ought. Finally to dwell with the Father as his child is to love the Father
with all of our hearts, and to have his love dwelling in us. We must ask God to help us realize the
expanse of our Father's love, for it is great. We must call out in sincerity and dependence, "Abba,
Father."
Chapter 7: "The All–Comprehensive Gift" Text: Luke 11:13 We see here how Jesus refers to his
model prayer for us, and the parables associated with it, and than changes the wording, and shows
us the truth of the greatest of gifts given to us through prayer, the Holy Spirit. We see how God
gives us this gift because all other good gifts are comprised in the Holy Ghost, and if we are to ever
be like the Father and ever hope to please the Father, we must have the Holy Spirit doing its work in
our lives. The Spirit is how God makes us more like him and more like his Son day by day. Such a
wonderful gift that contains so much and is found only with the Father, is certainly the first gift we
should seek from the Father. If we submit ourselves to the Spirit, then as he works, he will make us
to be more like the Lord Jesus. Day by day he bestows the gifts only he can truly supply. These gifts
are found exclusively as we submit to the Spirit's

School Prayer In Schools
School Prayer is a very controversial topic in our country today. Many famous figures in this nation
support the idea, but there is a number of citizens that do not. Wonder what the verdict is
constitutionally? Let's "dig in" and find out. The conflict of school prayer goes all the way back to
the nineteenth century. There was a lot of immigrants coming to the United States, and the majority
of them were catholic. A big influence on making school prayer in schools were mainly catholic and
other denominational and non denominational groups. In the twentieth century, a number of states
passed laws that it was mandatory for schools to have prayer and bible readings everyday before
class. School Prayer should be permitted in the United States because it is in the constitution, former
presidents have promoted it; and teachers would have freedom of religion in the class.
The Supreme Court made school prayer unconstitutional, but is still debated today. People who
agree with prayer say that if they remove prayer, that it is the public school's mission to "provide
children with an education in mores and values, as well as academic preparation." Supporters also
say that when students volunteer to pray, they have the right to the law of separation of church and
state, and other laws between the lines of freedom of religion. In "God we Trust" mottos and using
the Bible for swearing in public officials and federal holidays that have a religious background on
them. People that are

America Needs Prayer in Public Schools Essay
Not so long ago, a typical school day would begin with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer.
Today, a simple prayer is considered offensive and unconstitutional. A prayer is meant to be a
conversation with God; a personal connection to a sovereign being of choice. I personally believe
that prayer is beneficial. Prayer calms my mind and gives me the chance to thank God for all of his
blessings. Granted, not everyone believes in the same God that I do. I believe most people would
probably agree that there is some form of higher power that everyone has to answer to. One of the
things that I love about being an American, are the freedoms that I have. I am free to worship the
God I choose and to pray at anytime or any place that I choose. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Little did they know their complaint against the school system would shock the country and set into
motion a new way of looking at what was a time honored tradition. After several failed attempts
through the various court systems in the state of New York, the case ended up going before the
highest court in the country, the United States Supreme Court. On June 25, 1962, the United States
Supreme Court voted 6 to 1 in favor of banning the Regents' Prayer. The Justices considered the
prayer a "direct contradiction to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment which prohibits
the government from sponsoring or favoring any religion...prayer is a purely religious activity that
should be left to the people, not the government" (Haas 48). The Establishment Clause of the First
Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." (Irons 11). I believe that many people who read the First
Amendment and the Establishment Clause take it out of context. I agree that the government should
not be allowed to establish one religion, but I do not agree with the government interjecting and
infringing upon my rights or my children's rights to pray when and where they choose. Just look at
the last part of the Establishment Clause "prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." If my child
chooses to pray at the

This chart illustrates what prayer in public schools might look like without the restrictions that are
currently in place in our public schools. Is this what Americans want? Is this what Christians want?
Would such a plan work? Probably not. When it comes to their religion, most people struggle to see
beyond their own nose. Most people, including Christians, would balk at any plan or situation that
held their children as a captive audience to philosophies and beliefs they do not support, and that is
exactly why prayer exists as it does in today's public schools. Current restrictions on prayer in
public schools have nothing to do with a conspiracy to take God and prayer from schools. The
religious limitations placed on adults in public schools are a safeguard to protect children from adult
religious influences that may be in conflict with the religious teachings and values taught in the
home and church. For parents, for Christians, to insist prayer be allowed in schools without
restrictions is dangerous to the very values the Christian community or any other religious
community wishes to instill in their children. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not only have Christians fought and died for freedom and religious rights in America, but many
non–Christian families have sacrificed for this nation as well. They have just as much right to pray
and shout their religious convictions from the school rooftop as Christians. So, doesn't it stand to
reason that rather than turn public schools into a religious battleground or marketplace for the souls
of a captive audience, our children, that we as a society impose some restrictions on the role of
religion in public

Persuasive Speech On Prayer In School
Prayer plays such a big role in many people's lives. It happens each and every day and multiple
times throughout the day. Even though it can play a huge role in someone's life, it cannot be
practiced in schools. Prayer in school has been a very controversial topic for many years. According
to Steven K. Green, "On June 25, 1962, the United States Supreme Court decided in Engel v. Vitale
that a prayer approved by the New York Board of Regents for use in schools violated the First
Amendment by constituting an establishment of religion (Green 1)." It has since then been taken out
of school preventing teachers to preach or teach about religion. Around the year of 1962, a new law
was passed in the constitution stating that prayer in school was no longer allowed to be taught in
school. Now, as you can imagine, that angered many people all around the world, but it also relieved
some at the same time. There are many reasons why people were angered by this decision. Religious
people who supported the right to pray within the school system made accusations about this change
because they thought it broke the freedom of religious practices, the separation of church and state,
and their right to their own freedom. There were also many reasons why people were relieved.
Many people do not believe in praying every day, and to those people, they might have had the fear
of sending their kids off to school knowing that they may be forced to partake in public prayers.
Nowadays, students have

Essay on Prayer in Public Schools
Prayer in Public Schools
An issue that has been constantly debated for years is whether voluntary prayer in public schools
should be permitted. A student should be allowed to pray voluntarily at the beginning of each school
day based on many reasons. Prayer based on moral beliefs reinforce good citizenship as defined by
our forefathers. A daily reminder of a need for the belief of good over evil is a necessary part of this
society. Daily voluntary school prayer should be re–instated in public schools due to three reasons,
the historical basis of the beginning of the United States government, the serious moral decline since
prayer has been outlawed, and the government infringement on the constitutional guarantee of
individual freedom ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another reason for reinstating volunteer prayer in public schools comes from the fact that since
prayer has been prohibited in public schools, the morality of the nation has declined. Since the
Supreme Court outlawed prayer in public schools in 1960, the nation has seen a steady moral
decline. There is a strong correlation between the expulsion of prayer in public schools and moral
decline. Between the years of 1960 and 1990, the divorce rate has more than doubled, teenage
pregnancy and teenage suicide has increased 250%. Child abuse is now at an all time high and since
the end of school prayer, abortions have gone up more than 1000%. Universal principles of a
civilized society are mandated by the Bible and re–enforce by prayer. In the words of Ben Franklin,
? When we were subject to danger from the war with Great Britain, we met daily in this room to
pray for Divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard and graciously answered??Have we now
forgotten our powerful Friend? Do we no longer need his assistance?? The coming together to pray
daily provide support, re–enforcement and fellowship to keep minds focused on good instead of
evil. Many psychological studies have found that people who pray daily have spiritual faith in
goodness as presented in Christianity suffer less depression and are less likely to commit suicide.
Parents teach their children morals at home. These lessons of right and

Essay on Prayer in School
Over the years, there has been a very controversial debate on whether there should be prayer
incorporated within the public schools; half the population votes no on the topic. Many individuals
feel that allowing prayer services within the schools will be offensive and time consuming. A
common fear among the people is that there would not be an equal way to recognize everyone's
religion. There would be even more controversy as to which religions should be taught, in what
manner, and it's a very big possibility that one person's religion may offend someone else's which
would simply cause even more controversy.
It is argued that there isn't a way for every religion to be recognized within the public schools to
accommodate everyone ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It becomes very complicated, and there just isn't enough time in the day for it. In the United States,
school is held five days a week for seven hours a day, for one hundred eighty days of each year.
There simply isn't enough time for schools to be holding prayer services in order to meet everyone's
religious needs. Teachers are given a certain amount of information that needs to be covered, taught,
and learned by the end of each year. Based off of how little time there is, it just wouldn't be
practical.
Acknowledging religious beliefs also creates diversity among students. By addressing everyone's
faith, it can create a bad sense of discrimination among students. Secular Humanists believe that it's
very possible that by having discussions and prayer services within the school system, it can create
walls and barriers between the children and make clicks even stronger than they are already. This
may introduce differences amongst the children that were not necessarily noticeable or known
before hand. Prayer is often times looked at as a public issue that should be handled privately. Other
individuals have a different on opinion on the matter and feel that having prayer in school would be
a positive attribute. In 1962, there was the Engle decision which focused on "Taking God out of the
classroom." Many, often times religious conservative groups, have been fighting for a passage

The subject at hand is prayer in public schools. Also kids that are in school these days have many
different beliefs. A few issues in the American public life engender more controversy with religion
and public education. These students come from homes that espouse a variety of religious and
philosophical beliefs. First, that are in school these days have many different beliefs. Most kids don't
like things that happen around them because it goes against their beliefs and religion. These kids
feel that just because they have different beliefs that they still should be respected by their peers. I
also feel that our school system should respect the beliefs of our youth. Then not only should the
school system respect the different beliefs ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We as American have had incredible diversity of American society, it's important that our public
schools respect the beliefs of everyone and protect their parental rights. These schools can do this
best by allowing students to pray if they want to. I also, pray in school all during the day. Most of
my friend pray over their food at breakfast, lunch and dinner. So why can't we have prayer in school
and except the fact that there are some students who are very religious students. In 1962, the justices
ruled that official prayer had no place in public education. Now, I think that the decision was
misunderstood on that day. People say that prayer wasn't taken out of school when it was taken out
of school. Maybe the government are people that doesn't care how we view the world. Me as a
person goes to church every Sunday and I worship God the creator of everything that has life. Also,
I like to be at school and pray and worship God when I feel the need to. The government forget that
they to come from religious homes to. They also, were once children who were in school and around
student's who prayed in school. I recently seen a high school teenager pray in school at his
graduation. Everyone that was there had bowed their heads and listen to the prayer and you could
just feel the energy he gave off from that prayer. He prayed for God to cover our youth and elders.
Then everyone stood

Prayer in Schools Essay
Prayer in Public School
There are many different philosophies regarding prayer in public school. It seems to be a difficult
issue to decide upon. The opinions are wide–ranging and convoluted. This paper will attempt to
highlight the many ideas and opinions as to whether prayers in public school should be allowed and
to what extent. It will further show how our founders' idea of a separate church and state has been
taken out of context and why prayer in school should be allowed, but not required.
The first opinion to evaluate is that there should be absolutely no prayer of any kind in public
schools. Bob Croddy has been teaching for almost 30 years and he wrote an article for the NEA
Today opposing any type of prayer in school, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pollitt goes on to say that prayer in school does nothing to lower crime rates or teen pregnancy rates,
much less raise SAT scores. She concludes that," Nothing reveals the bankruptcy of the new
conservatism more than it is promotion of school prayer. The message to youth is clear. We have
nothing for you here, start thinking about the hereafter" (Pollitt 788).
In the same NEA Today that Bob Croddy wrote an article for, Connie Comeaux debated the merits
of a moment of silence. She has been teaching for nine years and is president of the Monroe City
Association of Educators in Monroe, Louisiana. She feels that if tragedy strikes a school and an
announcement goes out over the public address system for a moment of silence it should not be
against the law. She says that a moment of silence is not promoting religion. Ms. Comeaux says that
a moment of silence is not relative to any one religion and can be very beneficial to students to clear
their minds of clutter before the day begins (Comeaux 45). She also states that she does not believe
in state mandated prayer, and she does not want any government dictating how and to whom her
children should be praying (Comeaux 45).
These two feelings on the rights and reasons behind prayer or moments of silence in school are very
straightforward and clear. As we get

Should There Be Allowed To Prayer In School
People who are Christians and like to spread the word of God don't like that they can't spread God at
school. Everyone has the right to pray and spread the word of god in our school it even says so in
the first amendment(NCAC). But for some reason it is unconstitutional. People at my school think
it's a good idea to be able to pray. They feel we need to be able to spread the word of God.
In the First amendment, it states that we have the freedom of religion. For some reason the
courthouse come to the conclusion that prayer in schools is unconstitutional. There are people at
schools who feel the same way and just want to be able to pray out loud and for others. Our school
should be able to aloud, God and Jesus. Some people really need Jesus

Prayers in public schools: The debate about prayer in public schools had been in courts since the 40s
leading to the case Engel vs vital putting a stop to New York prayer in public schools. Many people
honestly think prayer is not allowed in public schools but that is wrong, students have any
opportunities to pray, again this is a state of flux, early as 1999 these activities were permitted in
fact they are more than allowed they are constitutionally protected as freedom of speech, religion
and assembly rights: graduation ceremonies, student religious clubs, moment of silence, prayer
outside of school building, school religious speech, rental of school facilities, teaching of evolution
& teacher display of religion. The law guarantees students ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The first amendment does not separate god and the government it encourages religious public
schools had prayer for nearly over 200 years before the Supreme Court ruled state–mandated class
prayers were unconstitutional. Our government was based on religious principles from the very
beginning. Prayer and bible reading in schools has led to three major Supreme Court decisions
depending on the country and the type of school, state sponsored prayer may be required, permitted,
or prohibited, countries which prohibit or limit school prayer often differ in their reasons for doing
so: in the united states, school prayer cannot be required of students in accurate with the
establishment cause of the first am amendment to the united states constitution. In 18th, 19th, and
early 20th centuries schools open up with a prayer or bible reading. There are many arguments
refereeing to the prayers in public schools, school prayers will allow religious believers to support
their beliefs, school prayer will promote good citizenship it also will lead to decrease tolerance and
less bullying since it can instill a sense of right and wrong and love for others than

Purpose Of Prayer In Public Schools
My Position
Ever since prayer was eradicated from the public school system, the quality of education has shown
a constant statistical deterioration. Society presumes that the supernatural is nonexistent and that
reality must be a dentist side based solely on man's interpretation. By reentering prayer into school,
it would acknowledge the presence of something higher than man. By granting prayer in school, a
crucial standard is set. It shows students that they are more than just a clump of random cells
aimlessly wandering the earth. Prayer is an action that trumpets that life is more than success. Prayer
is heavily opposed because it serves as an antithesis to the beliefs of those who create the policies
for the public school system (Creation Today). An underlying purpose of public education is to
frame honorable civilians. The majority of the American people are ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Sensationalized by the media, God was kicked out of the public school (Waggoner). World
renowned evangelicals supposedly applied at the court for appropriately separating church and state.
Despite the shock that overcame many American religious leaders, the rulings did not come out of
nowhere. A case like Engle v. Vitale was expected sooner or later. A law professor and constitutional
historian, Steven Green, talked about how the foundations of the Court's decisions in the second half
of the 20th century were initially laid during the second half of the 19th century (Waggoner). Green
says that the debate over the school was the closest that America had ever come to having a national
conversation about the meaning of the religion clauses of the constitution. There have been
attempted to re–introduce the reading of the Bible into schools. The reading of the Bible was still
allowed in many of our nation's public schools but it had become so nonsectarian that many courts
ruled that these practices were in fact lacking religious

If we lived in the 20th century, before you started reading this paper, you would have had to recite a
prayer with your students. It is surprising to realize that our country once forced students to say a
prayer everyday before they started school. For a while, there were no complaints about this.
However, as our country started to progress, people began to see the problem with it. People who
opposed prayer in public school believed it was unconstitutional. Those who supported prayer in
school believed it had an influence on students by reminding them of their faith. These problems
were taken to court, where they took away prayer in public schools. Although they took out prayer
from public schools, there are still people who fight for it to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Their reasons for this are that it is unconstitutional and that individual prayer is already legal. Their
reasons are very strong, because they are backed up by amendments that our country was founded
on. Even though some their points are strong, they do have some fallacies. Their reasons seem to be
a slippery slope. A slippery slope is like sliding down a slope you cannot stop (Halpern, 2015). They
are assuming that if the government allowed prayer in public schools, then the government would be
supporting only that certain religion. They also seem to have circular reasoning. Their reason of The
Establishment Clause and separation of church and state both end with the fact that the government
cannot force prayer in school is restating the conclusion.
The issue of prayer in public school seems to have been solved by the government taking away
prayer. But, as we have seen, there are still problems with both sides of the argument. One side of
the argument appeals to tradition and the other has circular reasoning. Religion is something that is
very important to some people. It should remain important to them, but there is a proper time and
place to practice worship. Worship should not be in a public place where education is the priority.
The government should have no involvement, directly or indirectly, with

Religion and prayer can benefit students in educational setting by positively having better. Prayer is
not just something that the kids need, prayer is something the teachers need. Many people argue
about prayer and say that it is unnecessary in school but I think it is. Prayer is needed in schools
because you never know what a child or teacher has been going through and they may need the holy
spirit to bring them joy. I know some kids go to church but not every kid goes to church but they go
to school. Just think of it this way if they don't go to church shouldn't the church come to
them.Prayer can teach kids in many ways. Prayer could lead you in the right path. It could help by
staying out of trouble and not doing drugs because some teenagers ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The issue of school prayer is about whether the public school systems should let the students pray, at
the start of the school day as a class. The issue of school prayer began in the late sixteenth. Recently
the U.S. Supreme court announced that it would not hear the appeals of a case banning the
traditional school prayer.The concept of prayer in public schools remains controversial for more
than 50 years after the Supreme Court ruled against school–led prayer.U.S. Supreme Court banned
school–sponsored prayer in public schools in a landmark 1962 decision, saying that it violated the
First Amendment.The absence of prayer in public schools is the blame for violence, drug use, and
social decay. The case for bringing back school prayer weakens even more as the nation becomes
even more diverse. Federal Law required school to permit only silent prayer. Some schools banned
prayer entirely, but others gave students a one–minute period of silence. I think students should be
able to express their religion in the way they were taught. Prayers bring people together in many
different ways. Prayers should help student get through their

Prayer in school has always been a very controversial issue. In 1963, the Supreme Court case of The
Abington School District v. Schempp was broadcasted for the nation, opening up the issue with
public schools requiring prayer as part of their education. The case told of The Abington Country
School District requiring elementary children to read 10 verses of the Holy Bible each morning in
school. The problem with the school requiring such a task is that not all the students were Catholic.
One parent in particular, Ellery Schempp, was very much against this practice in the public school.
He made the executive decision to take the Abington School District to court in hopes to allow
children to find their own form of religion. In the end, the case ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some people think that prayer will help out with the academic aspect of school. In the article
"Studying The Bible in Public Schools Can Help US Students 'Win the Future,'" the author, Nyasha
Junior, makes a point that having the Bible in public schools can help"to increase this vital cultural
literacy, public schools should teach courses in biblical literature"(Junior, Nyasha). But how can
allowing just one book in a public school make such a difference? Furthermore, public schools main
priority is to educate students about basic courses such as math, reading, science, and writing. It is
not a priority for a public school to teach subjects such as "...biblical literature." Also, in the same
article as above Nyasha Junior states "teaching biblical texts can contribute toward making the US
more competitive in the global marketplace. We need to educate students who can read critically and
make coherent arguments"(Junior, Nyasha). To sum up the quote from above, teachers are saying
that the Bible will help to make public school education better by encouraging competitiveness and
making valid arguments. However, what are teachers teaching now that is not helping public school
students become "competitive"? There has to be more than one resource available for students to
learn these valuable skills. Lastly, many people believe that if the Bible is allowed in school, it will
create peace. In the article "Mississippi Tells Public Schools to Develop Policies Allowing Prayer,"
Governor Mike Huckabee of Arkansas tells the media that public schools need to incorporate prayer
because public schools have become unsafe. "We ask why there is violence in our schools, but we
have systematically removed God from our schools," he said in a television interview. "Should we
be surprised that schools would become places of carnage?"(Governor Mike Huckabee of
Arkansas). Including the Bible and prayer in school may give some

Prayer in public schools is one of the few issues in America. Most of America's children attend
public school. American's continue to fight until this day whether or not if prayer is allowed in
public schools. Students should be allowed to part voluntarily at the beginning of the day for many
different reasons. School staff can not encourage a student's prayer. Prayer before eating a meal is
okay long as you're not bothering others. Making prayer a part of the school day can be helpful.
Some people think that prayer shouldn't be included in the activities at school. The government
thinks since prayer is being taught and recited at home, it should be kept at home. If they allowed
prayer at school it would lead student's thoughts and ideas in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Supreme court has ruled that the government cannot have anything to do with prayer in public
school. The government cannot tell students when to pray. The government cannot tell students what
to pray. The government cannot tell students that they should pray. The government cannot tell
students that prayer is better that no prayer. The most quoted argument against prayer in school is
that of "separation of church and state" this was actually in a letter that Thomas Jefferson had
written in 1802,when he received a letter from Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut
regarding religious freedoms. Students may conduct a group religious clubs, and "see you at the
pole" gatherings before school. If a school has a "moment of silence" or other quiets periods during
the school day, students can pray silently, or not pray at all. Teachers can neither encourage nor
discourage students from praying during such time periods. If God is allowed everywhere on earth,
then what makes schools different? Why should those who wish to pray be deprived the

Prayer In Public Schools Essay
Argumentative Essay
Is it right that Christians do not have a right to pray in public school? In 1962 the Supreme Court
issued two bans on prayer in public schools. Madalyn Murray O'Hair, founder of American Atheists,
Inc., was involved in the lawsuit. She fought to ban prayer in schools, and actively promote atheism.
Some would think that the law goes against our first amendment, giving us religious freedom; others
would claim it does not. It is reasonable that atheist parents would not want their kids praying, or
reading the Bible in class. They would naturally inflict their own views on their children and strive
for them to grow up believing the same as they do, but why should young Christians be oppressed
into forsaking their prayer while ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the major factors was freedom of religion. Meaning that anyone of any faith could exercise
his or her belief without being persecuted. Yet now it is wrong for a student or member of faculty to
pray in public? By calling out those who do pray in public, they are being stripped of their rights to
express their religion. A Christian becomes the victim of injustice. Jon Kennedy, assistant couch for
a high school football team, was suspended from his position because he refused to stop expressing
his Christian faith on the football field. After every game he gives all glory to God through prayer
on the field's 50–yard line. The district had ordered him to stop praying on the field, and threatened
suspension without pay. Kennedy was not going to be restrained from practicing his religion. After a
game one night, he walked out to the 50–yard line, and started praying. When he thanked God for
the boys on the team and for winning the game, he finished only to see that the football team had
been around him in prayer as well. Several would like to accuse the coach of coaxing the kids into
praying with him, which would violate the ban on public prayer. Not once did he coerce them, all
the kids came because they made the decision to. They felt the longing to thank God as well, and
they all looked to the coach, naturally, as a leader in prayer. The school board sees this, and decides
to take

Essay on School Prayer Should Be Allowed
School Prayer Should Be Allowed
I attended twelve years of Catholic School. My parents consented to the decision of my enrollment
and they knew what was involved. They knew that the study of God and prayer was mandatory.
Prayer in school in my case produced and environment of discipline and respect for the teachers.
The involvement of my parents and the faculty in the use of prayer was in full agreement. However,
my view was not even considered important. My rights had been violated.
The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States gives every individual the same
rights. One right is the constitutional protection for the free exercise of religion. The second right is
prohibition of the establishment of religion by the state. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the permission of the school a group of students could establish a prayer club. All these things
are legal, but what the government is trying to avoid is mandatory school prayer. Mandatory school
prayer is illegal and violates the constitution. It would contradict all separation between church and
state. If prayer in public school was made necessary the country would most likely be divided. You
would have the religious leader ecstatic about the freedom of prayer. Then you would have offended
non–believers or believer of other denominatio ns or people who find the government too
controlling. With legalization of prayer, would come disruption in the way the government is run.
Whereby the beliefs of an individual, like the president or a member of congress, would set goals
using feelings and not thinking through the problem. For example, a president with strong religious
beliefs would be against anything dealing with moral issues. The ideals of an individual would then
be imposed on another. Also the government, in giving permission to a prayer in school, would
imply that one religion was better than the another. This could be solved by giving each major
religion a prayer and read separately by individuals.
School prayer should be decided by the parents and the individual.
This way giving more control over what happens to where it belongs. The parents who are religious
would not mind if their children recited

Tricia Andryszewski School Prayer Analysis
School Prayer by Tricia Andryszewski first starts off by, talking about the first Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution. The students or even the teacher can't read the Bible at school or even the lord's
prayer. They could not it in public schools. In the 1963 Justice Tom Clark, waiting for the Supreme
Court. Alabama Governor George Wallace was going against them. He want them to be able to pray
and read the Bible at public schools if they want to. I do not care what they say in Washington, we
are going to keep right on praying and reading the Bible in the public schools of Alabama. The
Supreme Court decision in 1963 was a bad law, bad history, and bad culture.... And if the Court
doesn't want to reverse itself, then we have an absolute obligation to pass a constitutional
amendment to instruct the Court on its error. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Political thinkers in Europe also in the North American. Colonies sought to apply reason, order and
natural law to design of government. To prevent the government from using its authority and power
to mandate what its should think and believe. Thomas Jefferson believe that the United States
Constitution and the idea of the separation of church and state forbid the government from meddling
in religious matters in any way. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property without due process of laws; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the

Prayer Should Not Be Allowed In Public Schools

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Vickie Western

More from Vickie Western (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Prayer Should Not Be Allowed In Public Schools