Presidential Debate Pros And Cons

Presidential Debate Pros And Cons
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
Many thoughts are racing; many people are concerned. Who will be the new president of the United States? Us Americans will choose the 45th
president of the United States on November 8, 2016. So sad to say that President Barack Obama is ineligible for re–decision because of the term
breaking points set up in the Constitution, but never will the Americans forget the amazing job he has done.
Will Donald trump who referred to 'race man' 'money hunger' win. Will Mrs. Hillary Clinton step up as the first women and stand up for our rights.
Many of the future presidents say that they are for the people, but who would really be the people's president. The presidential debate is a big deal in the
united states. It is a lot of love, hate, and also threats all because of the election. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe the presidential candidates that we have right now are not the best candidates. If I had to pick one person, I would choose Hilary Clinton. I
believe she will be the only one that would be important far as helping our community because she actually does show that she cares about the African
Americans community and she definitely fighting for women equal rights although in the constitution it states that we all have equal rights but it
seems as if it is going left because it is a lot of things that women are not being able to do so I really do feel like she the great impact on the female
community.
–Wayneisha Turner
I believe the candidates who are running for presidency are not the best selections. If I had to choose, I would vote for Hilary Clinton. Having her as
a president would create history. I like her because she cares about all
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Big Role Of Social Media In The United States
Social media is an online community that most people choose to engage in our generation. It is a generation that people spend most of the time on
social media platform than the real society. Social media is not only a part of the social world, it is also an influence that are able to affect
individual's life as political perspective, culture perspective and economics perspective. In this essay, I will discuss the topic about how does social
media affecting social world in the political aspect. In the 2016 election, there were several news that being discussed in United States. The news was
about the presidential election of United States. And the news was being associated with social media platform.
Many news articles describes that social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People value the daily lives on social media. More than a platform that connects every individual in the social world, social media is the most
powerful weapon in the political war. The finding that describes the frequency of fake news on social media has been contributed in the article "Social
media and the election: Fake–news writer feels bad, pro–Trump bots, more" by Levi Sumagaysay. Sumagaysay explained that "The top–performing
fake news stories had more engagement on Facebook than the top–performing real news stories in the final three months of the campaign, a BuzzFeed
analysis has found. The numbers: 8,711,000 shares, reactions and comments on the fake news items, and 7,367,000 shares, reactions and comments on
articles from the likes of the New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News and others." The finding indicates that the frequency of fake news in the
past three month is way higher than before. More than that, there are reactions and influences of the fake

The Electoral College Is A Privilege Of A Democratic Society
Voting to elect government officials is a privilege of a democratic society. Every four years, in one of the most important events in U.S politics,
millions of American citizens exercise their voting power by casting a ballot for a presidential candidate. However, these millions of cast votes elect a
small group of state representatives known as the Electoral College, not the president of the United States. Under the current voting system the power to
elect the president is solely the responsibility of the Electoral College not the people. Although the Electoral College has a rich history, it is an outdated
voting system and should be replaced by National Popular Vote. This method electing the American president has been in practice since the eighteenth
century. Two years after Americans gained independence from the British, representatives from twelve of the thirteen original states gathered in
Philadelphia to write the U.S. Constitution. During that era, the states essentially operated as separate republics and moreover its own legislative
governing bodies. The goal of the document was to establish a strong central government without diminishing state rights (Ross 21). After extensive
debate and compromise, the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, thereby establishing the three branches of government with executive power
granted to the office of president. However, how should the president be elected? Representatives debated three options: a direct vote by

United States Voting System
(a) The political cartoon depicts Ralph Nader, a third–party candidate who ran in the 2000 election, addressing America's "throw–away mentality."
Meanwhile, a woman in the background is ironically casting her vote into a trash can labeled "Green Party Votes." Since the Unites States has a
two–party system, the vast majority of our country votes for major party candidates. Therefore, the point of view being expressed about minor parties
is that voting for a third party is throwing away a vote. For example, when Ralph Nader ran in the 2000 election, he had nowhere near the number of
votes needed to even compete with the major party candidates. So, he ultimately took votes away from the major party candidates, which could have
possibly changed the outcome of that presidential election.
(b) Two rules of the United States electoral system that act as obstacles for minor party candidates winningelections is the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Because they have an unlikely chance of winning a presidential election, minor parties can take chances and promote an idea to a larger degree than
major parties would. Therefore, they can introduce different ideas or issues that may not be mirrored by the platforms of the two major parties. An
example of this is when The Socialist Party introduced the notion of a 40–hour work week in regards to child labor laws in the early 1900s, which led
to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. They can also shift national attention to particular issues by pushing major parties to include underrepresented
concerns or groups. In other words, they often push major parties to adapt their policies to include third–party stances. So, when one of the two major
parties win, third–party voters may still get what they want if issues that fit many peoples' ideologies are

The Game Changer : Social Media And The 2016 Presidential...
From the Huffington Post in the article "The Game Changer: Social Media and the 2016 Presidential Election" author R. Kay Green (2015) discusses
strategies the candidates are using in order to win over the minority vote, which is to connect the millennial generation with social media. Specifically,
social media has been shown to improve voting patterns because the younger generation can see and read about the election through social media. For
instance, the subject matter first appeared in the 2008 elections as Barack Obama was the first candidate to use social media to his advantage, with
this strategy the candidate was able to gain more voters. Quickly, Obama's campaign tactic is obviously seen throughout the 2016 election with
majority of the candidates now appearing on more than one technology platform. Throughout the article R. Kay Green uses ethos, pathos, and logos
to support and express the impact that social media has had on the 2016 presidential elections. In the article "The Game Changer: Social Media and
the 2016 Presidential Election" Green (2015) uses logos to support the amount of money spent on social media and uses specific percents to show
how many political discussions take place over the internet. For example, R. Kay Green states, " political ad spending is expected to reach an
astounding $11.4 billion...social media is estimated to account for more than half of the $1 billion budget for digital media ". In other words, the
evidence above explains Green

Television And Politics
Since the creation of television, ideas and information have come into American homes influencing the watcher for better or worse. This had lead to
great influence on topics that have strong political ties. Television has allowed the United States population to access and keep up on political news for
the better of modern politics and presidential elections. Television allows the viewer to feel like they are a part of the debate, they also feel that they are
getting up–to–date news and that's two most Americans it is the only way to follow the election.
To begin with, television has improved for the election by allowing viewers to feel like they are a part in the debate.[D1: Position] First, in Campbell's
"Has Television Reshaped Politics?," ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most scientists claim that we are always on the brink of great discover. But, maybe this next great discovery will change one thing for the better, just
like television did for presidential

Comparing Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump Essay
These are the Two Worst Candidates in History Throughout the history of the American presidential elections there has never been an election that is
being dread this much. The choices for the election are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton has spent years in politics, and has held
both the position Secretary of State and First Lady. She is well known for the federal investigation into her and the corruption of the Clinton
Foundation. Trump on the other hand, is a very successful businessman and is worth billions. He has never been in politics and it shows when he
makes rude comments. Recently, he has been accused of rape and sexual harassment. This election cycle is a disaster with the candidates fighting at
every step of the election. They are always bring up what the other has done in the past, and about what they have said on the campaign trail. This
smear campaign has many wondering how these two were picked for candidates. On top of that, in debates they bicker back and forth like five year
olds. Also, instead of waiting for the other to finish talking during debates they try to talk over each other. The debates look like a yelling match.
Neither candidate shows restraint when they are suppose to be having a structured debate. Both of these candidates have showed throughout the
election trail that they are truly the worst candidates in history. Hillary Clinton since the start of the presidential race has spent a lot of time in the
courtroom fighting

The Presidential Election Of 1984
The United States presidential election of 1984 was the 50th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 6, 1984. The
presidential race was between the incumbent Republican candidate, President Ronald Reagan, and former Vice President Democratic candidate, Walter
Mondale. Reagan was helped in the election by a strong economic recovery from the deep recession of 1981–1982. Reagan carried 49 of the 50 states,
becoming only the second presidential candidate to do so after Richard Nixon 's victory in the 1972 presidential election. Mondale 's only electoral
votes came from the District of Columbia, which has always been considered a Democratic guarantee, and his home state of Minnesota–which he won
by a mere 3761 votes, meaning Reagan came within 3800 votes of winning all fifty states. Reagan 's 525 electoral votes (out of 538) is the highest total
ever received by a presidential candidate. Mondale 's 13 electoral votes is also the 2nd–fewest ever received by a second–place candidate, second only
to lf Landon 's 8 in 1936. In the national popular vote, Reagan received 58.8% to Mondale 's 40.6% (2016, 270towin.com)
For a long period, candidates running for President of the United States often have what's called a campaign strategy to help attract voters' attention. The
more voters they attracted, more likely those voters would choose them as their president elect. Technology has played a key role in doing that for past
elections and current ones. During

The Relationship Between Television and Presidential...
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on
the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for
three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign
budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of
television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
Researchers tend to hold one of three views ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Democratic vote, however, declined 3.1 percent more in the postcall districts than in the precall districts (p. 874).
This result suggests that the NBC prediction did have an impact on the election. Additionally, this result supports the impact of the media on political
behavior.
Some experts argue that rates of voting in the western states are not affected by early projections. Strom and Epstein argue that the decline in western
states' turnouts is not a result of the early projections by the networks but is the result of a complicated combination of factors, none of which is related
to information received on election day (Epstein and Strom, 1981, pp. 479–489). This argument denies the influence of polls on the voting turnout in
the first place, and it denies the impact of media on political behavior.
Other researchers look at the issue of exit polls from a legal perspective. Floyd Abrams, a First Amendment lawyer, supports the constitutional rights of
the media and says their exercising of their rights should not be restricted, even if that influences the voters:
Once it becomes a legal issue, even people who believe that projections are harmful, or that exit polls are sometimes misused, should unite and say that
the law should not be used to stop people

Electoral College Voting Process
During this Presidential election season, voters will try to ensure that their votes have the most impact in the election. The U.S. Constitution declares
that an Electoral College will elect the President of the United States, and that the various states will determine how those Electoral College votes will
be allocated.
Unlike other countries, The Unites States has a process that we go through when we are electing presidents.В¬ If a person wants to be President, they
announce themselves before the first primary election which is held in February and is the year before the actual election. Primary elections are elections
that are held in each state and helps the individual political parties decide whom their Presidential and Vice Presidential... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since our ideals did not believe in dirct democracy, I feel that way we elect our president is very pleasing to them. Even though we vote for the
president and vice president, we don't excacly vote for them. Because of this year's election, I feel like we should be more democratic in our
presidential elections. Due to the fact of how of the voters voted and the opinions of caditidates.I feel like if we be ore ddemocratic, we pwuld
rerpsect the way of the people. That means everyone's voices and opinion will be heard. It also means everyone vote would count and we would be
able o pick the predient o fth eUNited States wwithout anyone ding it for us.That is why I feel like we should be more democratic in our descioins.
Even though the opinions of the candiates during the campaign rallies had a huge effect on hw the voters voted, voters cast their voted depending on
who they feel is fit for the job and who can make thy country better, phically and finjically. But when it all over, it is up the electoral college to decide
our

Twitter In Presidential Elections
The introduction of media has significantly impacted the way candidates campaign during the United States presidential debate cycles. While
mainstream media outlets (i.e. televised newscasts, radio broadcasts) have played an important role in providing live coverage of events in which
candidates spoke about their platforms, the purpose of the media was completely altered with the introduction of social media, specifically Twitter.
While journalism was meant to be an unbiased practice, Twitter and other social media sites have taken on the role of a biased news source, forever
changing presidential elections in the process.
Founded in 2006, Twitter quickly became a prominent figure in the social media sphere, boasting more than 310 million... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While there has been a lot of negative feedback from the results of the election, both campaigns should see social media platforms, particularly Twitter,
as a catalyst for future change. The use of social media during the 2016 election has granted several candidates, not just the major party candidates,
plenty of media exposure to a differentiated group of voters. Additionally, social media grants candidates more time to directly communicate with
voters on issues that they are particularly passionate about. Furthermore, candidates have the opportunity to use feedback from social media sites to
predict future winners of the popular vote well before the election. The millennial demographic has not held back with their opinions on issues and the
results of the election; therefore, candidates and their campaign teams should take social media and the information it provides into serious
consideration when partaking in such large–scale

Do Public Debates Help Or Hurt Candidate Success?
Do public debates help or hurt candidate success in US presidential elections?
The date was September 26 1960, at exactly 7:30 p.m., somewhat an unfamiliar young and Catholic Senator from Massachusetts was about to change
the world. One of the most unusual points on the timeline of history where things changed very drastically all in a single night, was about to change
the political domain and of course the world. Senator John F. Kennedy and Vice PresidentRichard Nixon was about to partake on an adventure that was
ordinary. On that night, one of the most legendary moments transpired. This moment increased the power of television and benefited electioneering
since the political button on a shirt. The Nixon–Kennedy encounter had all interest, with the nation watching the first televised presidential debate.
For a majority of the United States of America, it was their first presentation of John F. Kennedy. When Kennedy, the 42
–year–old Irish–American
Junior Senator, was approached about the idea of debating his political opponent on television, he agreed instantaneously. While on the other hand, Vice
President Nixon had just concluded 12 days of hospitalization for a mishap knee injury. Richard Nixon's sweaty, pale and underweight, appeared
sickly, while on the other hand a glowing Kennedy, self–confident, and not to mention good looks won America's hearts. Millions watched the first
debate and were impressed as the young, attractive, articulate Senator from Massachusetts

What Is The Disengagement Of Young People?
As an international student, this is my first time witnessing the process of the presidential election here in the United States. Based on how people
behave and converse, I have realized that it was crucial to vote in the 2016 presidential election. This year, America had two of the most controversial
candidates competing for the presidency. Donald Trump ran under the Republican Party while Hillary Clinton ran under the Democratic Party.
Because most people had strong feelings toward each candidate, there had been a lot of pressure to vote. As a Xavier University student, I witnessed
this pressure as I saw people meeting to discuss the importance of voting, politically affiliated clubs holding forums to discuss the best strategies to
influence voters, and the Student Government Association providing free shuttle rides that took students to the voting stations. This is why claims
about the disengagement of young people baffle me. Many people, especially the older generation, argue that Millennials are disengaged in political
activity and voting (Dalton 54). This claim is false because Millennials engage in politics through taking part in campaigns, volunteering, and are well
informed on political issues. On the other hand, Millennials' voter turnout is low because even though they try to be involved in politics, politicians do
not engage them; this means that politicians are not interested in Millennials.
Young people participate in politics differently from the older

Political Rhetoric And The Media
"You don 't get the chance to make America great by getting rid of everything that made America great," Stated by Hillary Clinton during her
campaign rally in St. Louis, Missouri to attack candidate Donald Trump from his previous diverse rhetoric. Political Rhetoric has been very popular in
today's society. Politics use this as a platform to criticize other candidates about important points that are essential to the United States and its citizens.
Not only does others believe that political rhetoric is out of control but it is a negative form of art. During election time, the media and the internet
are critical for candidates because it gives them easy access to the younger audience. Although social media is enormous in today's society, this is the
best way for young voters to make their voices heard. Scott Keeter a research analyst and exit poll analyst for NBS News stated that "Young voters
have given the Democratic Party a majority of their votes, and for all three cycles they have been the party's most supportive age group" (Keeter, 1).
According to U.S. Census Bureau over the course of time the rate of younger voters "Dropped from 50.9% percent in 1964 to 38.0 percent in 2012"
(U.S. Census Bureau, 2).However, the media continue to evolve with modern society. I believe that rhetoric such as visual political rhetoric helps the
youth to get more involved with the political arguments while being educated and entertained at the same time.
When people talk about political

Presidential Election Vs. Presidential Elections
As we approach the final day of the US election, polls show vantage for Clinton, the representative of the democrat party over Trump, the
representative of the republic party so far. FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver 's predictions and polling data for the 2016 presidential election between
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, tells, 49.2% of the popular vote goes for Clinton and 44.5% of the popular vote goes for Trump. These popular
votes conducted in November 2, 2016. Clinton and Trump are the only candidates who remained in the race in the final stages representing their parties
after the other candidates lost chances in competition. They have completed all the three presidential election debates and they are about 1 week away
from the final day of the US election. There are few states remained undecided about the future president. The undecided and changing states are the
ones which will determine the wining candidate in the final day of the elections. My prediction for the US election result is that Clinton is going to
win the race. The factors shape the election results are the campaign events, tactics and the media influence. In this paper, I am going to discuss how
these two factors are contributing in Clinton campaign then I will propose a strategy for Trump to help him wining the race. Both candidates had
different career route and political life. ("Hillary ...") Clinton earned a low degree. She served as a first lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. She
also

Perception 's Configuration Of Reality : 45th Presidential...
Perception's Configuration of Reality: 45th Presidential Debate Jay Van Bavel's 2016 article addresses an important and relevant issue: voters' deeply
divided perceptions of presidential candidates. According to Bavel, approximately 70 million viewers tuned in to watch the final presidential debate on
October 19, 2016. In theory, one would be valid in assuming that while processing such an event, everyone should be experiencing the same reality–all
are watching the same debate, hearing the same words said by the same people. Strangely, however, this is not the case: in reality, Republicans and
Democrats concluded the debates with drastically separate conclusions on the candidates. According to a CNN poll referenced to within Bavel's
article, Hillary Clinton won the first debate, with 67% compared to Donald Trump's 27%. However, a further examination of these statistics reveals an
obvious divergence between the democratic and republican parties. According to democrats, Clinton won (89% to 5%); according to republicans,
Trump won (54% to 28%). Why is there such a great divide when both parties were presented with the exact same information? People do not see the
world objectively–without the influence of personal biases. Instead, people reinforce the goals and values of the partisan group they identify with,
allowing the party's views to color their perceptions of identical information (Bavel). According to a paper mentioned in the article, written by Bavel
and his research

Political Framing As Used By Presidential Candidates
THESIS: Political framing, as used by presidential candidates in the 2016 election, may determine the outcome of an election rather than the actual
qualifications or stance on issues of the candidates themselves. The 2016 presidential election totes probably the most controversial presidential race
in the history of the United States. In an attempt to sort through the rhetoric and cover, a citizen may be left perplexed at which candidate to vote for.
The claims of both parties show inconsistencies in character and purpose as they make assurances of what the country will be like if they are elected.
The strategy they use, called framing, is effective, but not new, in the realm of politics and journalism. Wikipedia defines framing as a social science
technique that "comprises a set of concepts and theoretical perspectives on how individuals, groups, and societies, organize, perceive, and communicate
about reality... In the context of politics or mass–media communication, a frame defines the packaging of an element of rhetoric in such a way as to
encourage certain interpretations and to discourage others. For political purposes, framing often presents facts in such a way that implicates a problem
that is in need of a solution" (Framing (Social Sciences), Wikipedia). The very essence of persuasion hinges on one party convincing another party,
through argument, that their way of thinking or solution is better. Thus, framing becomes the tool of persuading the general

Political Caucus
–A caucus is a meeting of members of a legislative body who are members of a specific political party to choose candidates or decide the policy. A
caucus is a system of local gatherings where voters decide which candidate to support and select delegates for nominating conventions. Caucuses are
special in that they allow participants to openly show support for candidates. Only registered voters can participate in a caucus and they are limited to
the caucus of the party with which they are a part of.
The Election for the President of the United States happens every four years on Election Day. It starts with the primary elections and caucuses and
moves to the nomination conventions during this process political parties each choose a nominee ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They demand the release of all of the imprisoned people because of marijuana charges and that their criminal records be cleared, this party is a single
party that only supports the legalization of marijuana, mostly adults and teenagers (young adults) support this party and this party was founded in the
good state of Kentucky, also the people in this party are scared Americans that are tired of having to fear living in the day of our government and they
demand the rights to grow marijuana, anti–prohibitions the people of this party, Local chapters have been formed in 8 different states and are joined
with a number of international cannabis political

The Evolution Of Presidential Campaigns
Niko Kazanjian
Presidential Politics
12/2/14
The Evolution of Presidential Campaigns and Government–Media Relations
The media has always played an important role in the President's relationship with the public, but just what kind of affect does it really have on the
executive office? The first televised presidential debate in 1960 between John F. Kennedy andRichard Nixon marked the beginning of a new era – the
inaugural shift of the media's role in politics. Since that time, the media has continued to transform the way the president is perceived by the public
through print, broadcast, and more recently, social media. All of said outlets have played vital roles in not only a president's campaign, but also in
their presidency and likability throughout their time in office. While the White House is still the source of most presidential news, the media are the
shapers of the story and can frame it pretty much any way they want. There used to be limits on certain issues or realms of the presidency that were to
remain untouched, however, first amendment freedoms take precedence over almost any restriction the government could try to place on the media.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the media and the president throughout recent years, looking briefly into the past to
establish the scale of the dramatic change, and to study their reciprocal connection of how each utilizes the other.
Looking Back On September 26, 1960, the first of

The Election Process Of The United States
Every four years the United States has its presidential election, a process which was originally designed by our forefathers to be a way that the
people can decide who is their commander in chief and have true representation of the common people's best interests. The way our current electoral
process is set up though has become less then a shadow of what our founding fathers wanted for us. Today our presidential elections are skewed by the
electoral college, a system that in itself is easily manipulated by big corporations and corrupt politicians that have their own interests in mind, not the
interests of the people. Adding further to this corrupt system known as the electoral college there is a slew of evidence pointing to, yet not limited to
voting fraud, voting manipulation and the media manipulating what the people see happening during the election process. Although some would argue
that the United States election process is structurally stable, the election process needs to be revamped because evidence shows that the process is
corrupt and not in the favor of the people.
In past elections there have been events that point to the fact that the United States election process is corrupt. An example of this would be the 2000
presidential election, the state
Florida having to recount their votes due to errors in the voting machines. Gore was ahead with
260 votes but after the recount, using a voting process that confused many voters, Bush won with an astonishing large amount

Vote Trump Persuasive Essay
The 2016 presidential election has been a long, riveting election full of
unexpected twists and turns down to the final two candidates – multimillion dollar Trump
or the second Clinton. In the eleventh month of this year, November 2016, the finalized
vote will be announced nationwide – though many are left unsure of what to do – vote for
their originally intended party, refrain from voting all together, but there is a solution.
Vote Trump. With Trump's background and experience in the money making business,
deals and transactions will not phase him, he is, regardless of what the uneducated society
says about him, a loyal United States citizen, and he is not afraid to say what is both on
his mind, along with what action needs to be taken in order to put ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Trump will support
American laws, the Constitution, and the nation's borders" (Vorse).
How much longer can America survive on insecure leadership? Trump might be
blunt, but maybe what America needs is blunt. "But anyway, we have training camps
growing where they want to kill us. That's my question. When can we get rid of 'em?"

(Trump). Yes, the comment made was blunt, but was it straightforward and to the point?
No other candidate has taken such an honest route in their campaigning and that is why
the country has ended presidential term again and again, in deeper debt and despair than
when each president began their term.
For the many Americans who are not of caucasian descent, are not of the higher
class, or are not in agreement that the government should get to make personal decisions
for citizens (such as abortions or same–sex marriage), there is a concern. Concerns for
small business owners and lower class Americans after election of candidate Donald
Trump, have been brought up. "Despite his claims that his rise to one of the wealthiest
Americans wasn't easy, Trump does not know what it's like to pinch pennies"

The Presidential Debate On The American System Of...
A constructive national debate is something that is quite important to the functioning of the American system of democracy. A simple definition of
democracy offered by the Merriam–Webster dictionary is that democracy is "a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting"
(Merriam–Webster). Now, at a time of heightened awareness from many American people, the political debates in this country don't seem to be
providing them with good cogent arguments. Instead they are filled with fallacies and many falsehoods. In this essay I argue that the presidential
debate system is currently not living up to its potential, and I will focus specifically on Republican primary debate that took place at the Reagan
Library in Simi Valley, California. In doing so, I will argue that the main flaws in this cycle's presidential primary debates were the amount of fallacies
used, as structure used as well as provide some counter–arguments to my claims. In order to have a government that is run by people; specifically,
people that must choose a candidate to vote for, its seems fit that it would be important that there be adequate means of illustrating each candidate's
positions on all of the issues that the constituents care about. Presidential debates are the means of showcasing a candidates' policies to the nation and
at the same time they allow the citizens in the democratic society to make a more informed decision about their vote than they otherwise would have
without a debate.

The Importance Of The Electoral College System
Importance of the Electoral College System Since its establishment the electoral college has always come under fire for the way it executes the
election process in the United States. Many people believe that a direct popular vote is the best way to elect president and vice president, rather than
the indirect election process used now. Because of this conflict, the question of whether or not the electoral college should be abolished continues to
be a heated debate, especially after the most recent presidential election. Though the electoral college system does have some flaws, like every system
does, it should not be abolished. The electoral college system should not be abolished because it allows the smaller populated states to have ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This means the candidate who wins the most votes in the state also wins the states electoral votes and wins the state as a whole. A particular
advantage to having this method with the electoral college system is creating clear cut election winners. In the 1992 Presidential Election Bill
Clinton had 43% of the popular vote and George H.W. Bush received 37.5% of the vote creating a slim majority winner(Doc B). Yet the electoral
vote was able to show a more decisive winner in this election. Bill Clinton with 69% and Bush with 31% of the electoral vote(Doc B). The electoral
college system is able to create more decisive elections than a direct popular vote would ever be able to. Along with the other benefits stated above the
electoral college system continues to keep the two party system alive. The two party system allows for moderate candidates that focus on important
issues the United States faces at that moment. Because of this, it helps to dissipate the multiplication of splinter parties and single issue
ideologues(Doc E). Single issue ideologues, or people who blindly support a particular idea or set of ideas which are encouraged through the popular
vote system, would also make it harder for a election majority winner to be named (Doc E). The electoral college system thus allows for the two party
system to continue to stay alive and strong moderate

Presidential Election : Election Cycle Essay
Regardless of an individual's political enthusiasm, the 2016 election cycle was one of, if not the most widely discussed election cycles in the history of
the United States. Citizens and non– citizens from across the globe seemed to voice their opinions about either presidential candidate at one point or
the other, the same goes for various House and Senatorial, except on a smaller scale. This essay will focus on the outcomes of the 2016 general elections
thought an in–depth analysis of the following criteria; who voted for the candidates in the presidential and senatorial races, what was the reasoning
behind their vote, when these individuals decide to vote, where the voters came out to vote and how that differed from previous election cycles and
finally why this election cycle was so unique in its predictions and outcomes. For the 'who' aspect of this election cycle, we need to analyze those
individuals who participated in the November election, more specifically, those who reside in one of the biggest electoral states in the union,
Florida. Along with who participated, we will look into how the candidates and special interest groups mobilized to shape the outcome of the state in
comparison to pervious election cycles. According to the 2010 census, Florida, with its approximate population of 20 million people possess 29
electoral votes, or roughly 10% of what is needed to win the White House. Florida is branded the quintessential 'swing state' for it ability to sway or

The Presidential Election Of 1980 Essay
On Tuesday, 4 November 1980, The United States presidential election of 1980 was held. The competition was between incumbent Democratic
President Jimmy Carter and his opponent, former Californian Republican Governor, Ronald Reagan. Reagan, assisted by a falling economy
complicated by inflation and high unemployment, and the Iran hostage crisis, Reagan would win the election in a sweep, receiving the largest number
of electoral votes ever tallied by a presidential candidate not currently in office. Jimmy Carter, who beat out Edward M. Kennedy for the nomination for
Democratic leader, attacked Reagan as a wild right–wing fundamentalist. The former actor, Ronald Reagan pledged to elevate the cynical mood of the
nation, and won a conclusive victory. This election marked the creation of what was called the "Reagan Revolution," and indicated a conservative
repositioning in national government.
Throughout the 1970s, the United States underwent a wrenching period of low economic growth, high inflation and interest rates, and intermittent
energy crises. In the spring and summer of 1979, inflation was on the rise and various parts of the United States were experiencing energy shortages,
Carter was widely blamed and planned on delivering a major speech about energy conservation, but he thought the American public did not care for
what he had to say. In the mist of all this, Carter went on the presidential retreat for the bilateral treaty on Camp David. "For more than a week, a

The Impact Of Social Media On American Elections
The Impact of Social Media on American Elections and the importance of 21st century media outlets
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media websites have affected American elections in many forms. Candidates are now turning their
attention to the people on social networks Murse (2015). They 're trying to draw more people like Millennials because they use more technology.
These applicants are trying to step up and make a huge difference from the election of 2008. While in the running, the usage of social media is being
used to announce what he or she is doing for the presidential campaign. For this reason, candidates, controversy, public opinion, social media and its
21st century media outlets have become the center of the 2016 election (CIO, 2015). The US presidential election will be on Tuesday, November 8,
2016, and a new president and vice president will be elected through the electoral college (Wikipedia, United States presidential election, 2015). The
popular runners are Hillary Clinton, who is a democrat and Donald Trump, who is a republican. Other popular rising candidates are Ben Carson and
Bernie Sanders and more beyond them (The New York Times, 2015). Since they're in a fight to become president, there has become a controversy
between the candidates. The GOP, known as the Grand Old Party truly believes that Donald trump has a chance in the election. Due to the fact that he
has a great deal of support from the people and other political parties (The

Electoral College System Essay
The roots of the Electoral College System can be traced way back to more than 200 years. A controversial debate on the effectiveness of Electoral
College continues over years. The founders established it as a resolution between president choice by a vote in congress and choice of the president by
qualified citizens' popular vote. 538 electors constituted the Electoral College and 270 majorities of electoral votes choose the president. The United
States got its independence from Great Britain, and its government based on the Articles of Confederation (Burgan 9). According to Burgan, under the
article, the states acted almost like separate nations (9). It is well–known that the United States president becomes elected by Electoral College and ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The system also maintains the nations' federal character since combinations of even small states opinions receives attention. A small portion of a very
populous state cannot overshadow the minority. The status of the minority is enhanced as they influence critical edge for candidates to emerge
victorious. Contestants get encouraged to venture into minorities through the system and not ignore them. The College also eliminates most election
problems. According to Bugh, the system essentially assigns to the winner the votes of the people who voted against that candidate (159). He
continues that because there is no way to total votes across states, the votes for candidates who do not win a state do not have a role in the outcome of
elections (159). In–case of recounts, it occurs only in states and not nationwide. I believe the college encourages stability via the two–party system
where regional minorities are not undermined.
The intention for the design of Electoral College appeared to choose a person that demonstrates both popular support and a broad distribution of
support. This goal becomes an achievement over the past decades. Some critics think that voting power of smaller states gets overrepresented. They
fail to acknowledge the democratic will of all states as equal despite their low populations. Presidential campaigns disperse

IKEA: A Case Study Of Interpersonal Communication In The...
Interpersonal communication
Interpersonal communication is an exchange of information between two or more people. Successful interpersonal communication is when the
message senders and the message receivers understand the message.
Interpersonal conflict at workplace, someone tries to cause trouble with other workers by disagreeing views or ideas and resulting in fights. In this
part of the research I would like to analysis on how Interpersonal conflict affects work place.
Case study: How IKEA avoids miscommunication among staff
Togetherness is an integral part of the IKEA culture.
As such, IKEA has several programmes in place to allow staff to interact with each other to build rapport to better understand each other.
Using a co–worker ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People who watched it on T.V surely believed Kennedy won by a long shot. We all know Kennedy ended up winning the election, so why was the
audience so polarized? Because while Nixon sounded good, he looked awful! Nixon was pale, sweaty and clearly anxious next to the young, handsome
and confident Kennedy. Nixon had a grey, ill–fitting suit and refused makeup, while Kennedy had a dark, well–fitting suit and allowed makeup artists
to touch up his already tanned skin, fresh back from campaigning in sunny California. Kennedy confidently looked right into the camera while Nixon
never settled his gaze. Overall, while people may have agreed more with what Nixon said, Kennedy's way of presenting himself made him the winner
to those who saw it in

Presidential Election Of The United States Essay
Presidential debates in the Unites States are a hot topic around the world. Even though American voters have the role of choosing the next president,
people from many different countries tend to heed interest in the elections, due to the fact that the president of the United States has such an influence
in locations around the world. People rely on the media to obtain factual information about the presidential candidates, their political stances, and
interests in foreign affairs. The fact that information about the presidential candidates can be distributed worldwide by the media is wonderful. Even
though this sounds wonderful, it is possible that statements during the debates, or results from them, can be portrayed with bias by the media, or even
censored. So, there is a possibility that the interpretation of the American presidential candidates, by people around the world, may be altered after a
debate. This change could be influenced by the debate itself, or by media releasing information about the debates. This will be performed by showing
the effect debates and media have on voters in the United States of America, academic journals regarding censorship in Russian media, and ultimately
comparing the results of several of the 2016 presidential debates between presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, portrayed by the
pro Hillary Clinton American News source, the Los Angeles Times, to Russia's pro Donald Trump Pravda Report.
It is a common belief that

The Election Of The Electoral College Essay
In the United States of America, the presidential elections are based on the Electoral College. The Electoral College is combined of the house of
senators, House of Representatives in every state, and the U.S. Congress which is the head. In each state, a senator and, a representative's get one
electoral vote, whosoever they cast their vote in for earned that electoral vote. Usually those Senators, and representatives cast their vote for their
party's. In my opinion, I think is unfair to citizens, that the Electoral College show no regards, but select electors cast their votes to determine the
President, instead of the popular votes choosing the winner. Example of how the Electoral College gets to pick who the next president is, are shown
in the 2016 presidential election that was between two presidential candidates, one named Hillary Clinton, who is a Democrat, and Donald Trump, a
Republican. Hillary Clinton received less electoral vote, and more popular votes. Donald Trump received more Electoral votes, and less popular votes.
Although more people voted for Clinton, Trump won the election since he had more electoral vote, and the electoral vote decide the winner of the
presidential election. Donald Trump is not the only candidate that has won the election by the (Electoral College) electoral votes. Statistics have shown
that this 2016 Election is not the first time candidates have won the popular votes, but lost the election because of the 270 Electoral College

The Importance Of Latino Political Parties In The 2000...
The amount of Latinos in this country is rapidly growing; the Latino community is 16.3 percent of the population. In the article written by Kate
Linthicum, it is estimated that 40 million Latinos will be eligible to vote by 2030 and in 2014, 25 million Latinos were eligible to vote. In the previous
2012 Presidential elections, the massive amount of Latinos had a significant importance in the election. Both the Democratic and Republican political
party aimed to receive the support of the Latino voters. This upcoming election both political parties will have to find strategies to win over the Latino
vote. Neither the Democratic nor the Republican political party is a perfect fit for the Latinos in the United States. They both have some qualities ...
The Democratic Party will have to overcome the high number of deportations under the Obama administration. The Democratic Party will have to find
strategies to bring voting enthusiasm among Latino voters (Przybyla). In the last 2012 election, Latinos had a 40 percent turnout rate. This is not a
true representation of the eligible Latino voters. The Democratic Party will need the Latino votes in swing states like Nevada, Florida and Colorado

The United States Election Process Essay
The United States Election Process With the 2016 presidential election on its way, with two of the most polarizing candidates ever. And one who
shared that if he loses then the "System is rigged". With Congressional approval rating at 17%, politics in the U.S appears rotten. Which is what the
freackanomics episode I listened to, "10 ways to make politics less rotten" was about. But how may know how the U.S election cycle actually works?
The process can be quite complicated and confusing at times. So it is understandable why many may not know how it works.
Step 1: Requirements
To run for President of The United States you must first meet the requirements set for in Article Two of the US Constitution. This Article states that to
serve as President you must be a natural born citizen of the US and be at least 35 years old. You must also be a resident of theUnited States for over 14
years. This candidate doesn't have to meet these requirements prior to running but must meet them by Inauguration Day. What is not mentioned in the
requirements, is the amount of funds it takes to run for President. It can cost up to hundreds of millions of dollars to fully fund a Presidential
campaign run. This reason alone is what limits so many third party candidates for President. Only billionaires such as Ross Perot can have some
success running this way.
Step 2: Primaries
The current process of nominating a U.S. Presidential candidate is called a primary. Every major party in the

The Negative Effects Of Television On Politics
Television is one of the most influential technological development of the 20th century that allowed society to be more accessible to information and to
be more communicative between people. By the 1960s, television has reached politics in the United States, greatly impacting its presidential elections.
Although, it has served as an effective media stimulating political interests of the Americans, it has brought many more negative impacts on American
politics; Not only does television distort images of the candidates and legislators, it also, distracts people away from politics. Thus, television, a mere
tool that commercialism employs, producing no politics, but "cotton candy for the mind", has no beneficial , if not degrading effect on America's
presidential elections.
To begin, television creates distorted images of politicians. Broadcasts and shows on television can easily be manipulated, whether intended or not,
giving the audience a misleading and false impressions of candidates. Theodore H. White, a subscriber of John F. Kennedy in the debate, The Making
of the President 1960, even agreed that "Kennedy's victory was [solely] a triumph of image over content"(Menand). He further states, "Kennedy
benefited because his image on television was "crisp",[whereas] Nixon's light–coloured suit, wrong makeup, and bad posture was "fuzzed""(Menand).
A person's character and quality cannot be determined by their outer appearances on screen, however, television inevitably creates

Presidential Election Of United States
Name
Due date
Word count: 1596
Presidential Elections
Introduction
The presidential elections of United States of America take an indirect form where citizens of the U.S who are registered as voters in one of the
states in U.S which are usually 50 states, or the District of Columbia, cast ballots for Electoral College members, referred to as electors. These electors
then in turn cast direct votes known as electoral votes in their respective state capitals for president and vice president positions of the United States.
Each states casts as many electoral votes that is equal to the number of its Senators and representatives in Congress, while in Washington, D.C. they
cast the same number of electoral votes as the least represented state, which is three. The day when registered voters cast their ballots is called the
Election Day. This paper is going to generally discuss the presidentialelections history, an outline of the process of the process of presidential elections,
constitutional requirements for presidential candidates in the U.S, presidential nominations, general elections campaigning, Electoral College and
lastly inauguration.
To begin with, the founding fathers of the United States came up with a democratic system in which the American people had the power and
responsibility to choose their leader, unlike Britain where leadership was monarchical. George Washington was the firstpresident of the United States
of America to be elected under this new order, which

Take a position that defends, challenges, or qualifies the...
I do believe that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections. In modern times there is a need for television for these types of
events. The authors mentioned agreed with the fact that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections. One source, Source D, is a
chart of the ratings for presidential debates. I believe that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections because the world has changed
in recent years, the people have changed, there is a trust in the people who are on television, and there is a more honest aspect when someone sees it
themselves. I believe that television has been a positive impact for presidential elections because the world has changed into more modern... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is positive because there are too many people to not have this technology to help. The people also put their trust in people that have power. In his
article, "Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics," Source E states, "Johnson was a great believer in public opinion polls,
and he knew that a recent poll had shown that the American people trusted Walter Cronkite more than any other American to "tell it the way it is."
(Ranney) Because of this, the American people placed their trust in the hands on Cronkite. They trusted him more than they did their president, and
because of that President Johnson made the decision to get out of Vietnam and not run for another term as President. President Johnson knew that the
American people would listen to Cronkite more than they would him. This made television positive because they could see for a fact what Cronkite
had to say.
The chart in Source D shows the television ratings for presidential debates. The ratings have had an overall decline as the years go on. This is
because the people tend to change, and the technology is not advanced enough yet for them to be satisfied. As in the above argument, where they
needed to see the candidates in order to truly have a grip on what they are saying, they now need a newer way to view the candidates in the debates for
the people to have a better understanding of

The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Candidates
During presidential elections in the United States, it has become customary for the main candidates (almost always the candidates of the two largest
parties, currently the Democratic Party and the Republican Party) to engage in a debate. The topics discussed in the debate are often the most
controversial issues of the time, and arguably elections have been nearly decided by these debates (e.g., Nixon vs. Kennedy). Candidate debates are not
constitutionally mandated, but it is now considered a de facto election process. The debates are targeted mainly at undecided voters; those who tend not
to be partial to any political ideology or party.[2]Presidential debates are held late in the election cycle, after the political parties have nominated...
Mitt Romney, for instance, took the lead over President Obama after what was judged to be a strong first debate in 2012. And Hillary Clinton appears
to have gotten a bounce of a few points after this year's first debate.
Yet historically, those effects often haven't last very long. Sometimes a debate bounce will just fade, or sometimes it will be canceled out by a
subsequent debate that helps the other major candidate (as it was for Romney).
The most prominent political speaker that is caught arguing with logical fallacies is Donald Trump. Trump states." If Hillary can't satisfy her husband
[then] what makes her think she can satisfy America". This ad hominem is used to undermine Hillary Clinton's ability to be president in the United
States. It is also a false cause because Trump is pinning one of Bill Clinton's mistakes onto Hillary, stating if she were able to "satisfy" her husband,
he would have not cheated. This is none of Hillary's concern or business to look over her husband's actions when she has her own agenda to attend
to. This anecdotal uses one social event as evidence that Hillary cannot perform an adequate job. It is also a hazy generalization that women only
have one purpose in life: to satisfy their husbands. Trump immediately assumes situations and expresses strict gender roles where they may not exist.
He could have given a different example to express the concern he has for

Hillary Clinton Candidate Analysis
The Candidate that speaks more effectively
In the Presidential debates, Hillary Clinton speaks more effectively. She does this by remaining professional in answering the questions that were
asked. When the debates get heated, Clinton is the candidate with the right temperament. She also presents herself as being more prepared and
knowledgeable. Something else Hillary does well is sticking to the topics and facts that are being discussed and being crystal–clear in delivering her
information.
When the Candidates of the Presidential Debates become acrimonious, Hillary Clinton is the candidate with the right temperament. She doesn't let her
arguments get personal and she doesn't fight back against her opponent. Trump likes to blame everything ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What Hillary does well is valuing all facts when acting in response to questions. With this in mind, Hillary is presenting herself as transparent. She is
crystal–clear in her explanations. We know that she is using fact, because everything she says can be supported in some way. When listening to the
debates, Hillary mentions several times that she has a fact checker on her website, Hillaryclinton.com. However, Trump struggled with truthfulness
throughout the debate. A recent article about the first debate says, "The Washington Post rated about 65 percent of his statements to be "Four
Pinocchio's" (their worst rating for lies), and PolitiFact has scored only 16% of his statements as "true" or "mostly true." This severs his credibility and
brings his judgement into question. Trump also had trouble answering specific questions regarding his plans and had a hard time keeping his temper
under control when confronted about having inaccurate facts. To add on to this, in the second debate he also weaved around tough questions about
ungraceful remarks he had made in 2005, constantly calling it just "locker room talk." Yet, Clinton's efforts of being clear in delivering her information
proves that she doesn't want the audience to think she is keeping secrets so she can be

Essay On 2016 Presidential Elections
2016 presidential election of United States of America are scheduled to be held on November 8, 2016, in which voters will choose presidential
electors, and they will in turn choose President and Vice president through the Electoral College based on the jurisdiction results. The 2016 presidential
election will announce the 45th president and 48th vice president of United States of America. With every single day passing, the US presidential
election date is coming closer and debates are on rise of who will win the 2016 presidential election. In United States of America, presidential election
polls season starts one year before the elections. They have one more rule that public cannot vote directly; they will chose presidential electors and who
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She was born on October 26, 1947. Hillary Clinton is the wife of the former president Bill Clinton. She was the 67th Secretary of United States. She
worked as senator as well.
Tim Kaine: Tim Kaine is the nominated candidate for the Vice President from the Democratic Party. Tim Kaine was born on Feb 26, 1958. He is the
attorney in United States of America and is also a junior senator of United States from the Virginia state.
Republican Party:
Donald Trump: Donald Trump (Donald John Trump) was born on June 14, 1946. He is the American businessman and a well known TV personality.
Donald Trump is nominated as the candidate for president from the Republican Party.
Mike Pence: Mike Pence's full name is Michael Richard Mike Pence and was born on 7th June 1959. He is also governor of Indiana. Currently, he is
nominated as candidate for the Vice President from the Republican Party.
Libertarian Party:
Gary Johnson: He is the American author, businessman and politician. He served as the Governor of New Mexico as well. Gary Johnson is nominated
candidate for the president from the Libertarian Party, and was born on Jan 1st

Presidential Debate
Jackson
Dr.Dubose
Debate Speech
By far, the United states presidential debate is one of the most popular debates in America. The debates are extremely important for the citizens of the
United states because they help those in the audience as well as those watching from their homes decide who will be the country's next president for
the next four years of office. Not only does the debate reveal how the presidential candidates will solve their issues for the country, if elected, but they
also create a long lasting connection and relationship between citizens and the candidate. The citizens of the United States either tune in on television or
arrive at the debates location to witness the most anticipated debates that takes place every four ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Donald Trumps and Hillary Clintons first impression in all of the debates were unfriendly because in the beginning of each debate both Hillary and
Donald never shook hands with each other. The appearance of Donald trump was not candid either. Donald Trump showed to all debates in his usual
business attire, black and white suit with a red tie. That appearance gave a 'it isn't personal, it's just business' impression to the audience. Hillary,
however, dressed formally like she was normal united states office personnel. All in all, both Trump and Hillary put on a great and entertaining debate
for the 2016 presidential

Presidential Debate Pros And Cons

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Teresa Oakman

More from Teresa Oakman (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Presidential Debate Pros And Cons