The Influence Of Humanism

The Influence Of Humanism
Have you ever wondered why nowadays there are less less people going to church or even
supporting God? 500 years ago new ideas started to spread throughout europe, ideas that man
doesn't need God. This idea is called Humanism. In Humanism humans are more important than
god. Humanist solve problem in "human ways" instead of resourcing to a god. During the
renaissance Humanism develop and spread throughout europe. Some of the most known artist,
writers, and even religious figures influence humanism of the renaissance. Even though today you
don't hear the word humanism a lot it's still a major influence in today's society. So why did
humanistic ideas become so popular? One of the main reason is the renaissance. Humanism develop
so much during the Renaissance because a lot of influential people believed and even spread
humanism. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Allentown museum stated the following about the Vitruvian Man; "Man is the measure of all
things" (Kintzer and Wetterlund). Since Humanism is about appreciating humans this clearly shows
humanism, what greater honor can you get than being in the middle of everything. Everything has a
size this shows how man instead of god is connected to everything physical in this world. Likewise
Tom Ashbrook, an award winning journalist, wrote this about the Vitruvian Man, "symbol of man in
the universe, man as the universe"(Tom Ashbrook). This is an obvious example of humanism since
it shows how man can be free of god, can be in the universe with only himself and other humans,
and even be the universe ourselves. Da Vinci's view on humanism was clearly implemented on his
paintings, not only this but they undoubtedly spread throughout Europe and later on the world,
which explains to us why most of us have already since this
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

How Did Erasmus Change During The Renaissance
Renaissance was the period of great changes and was characterized by a revision of many concepts.
The churches during the renaissance was being questioned by many scholars and one of the greatest
scholar of this period Desiderius Erasmus, a Christian humanist and the second scholar was a monk
from Germany named Martin Luther. The scholar Desiderius Erasmus was a dedicated Christian and
advocated reforms within the church and spread the idea of pacifism. He questioned the church in
many ideas and stated that people should live their own life and not always thinking about being
saved. For example He believed that baptism should be by full immersion and should come only
after one had accepted Christ as his personal Savior. He continued to assault erroneous Catholic
Church practices and because of some of his literatures works he was charged as a Lutheran by
Catholic Church authorities. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Erasmus questions toward the Catholic Church led to many new reforms during this renaissance era.
The Popes of the Catholic Churches were more concerned with politics than religion and started to
allow people to pay to receive indulgences.
Martin Luther, a Monk from Germany and who agreed with some ideas of Erasmus was another
reformer and who questioned the Catholic Church during this period. Both Martin Luther and
Erasmus agreed that the church needed to have some reforms but challenged each other on certain
issues. Martin Luther stated that people should not be saved by good work but their faith in God
alone and that people shouldn't pay to be saved. Martin Luther was against the Popes allowing
people to pay to receive

How Did Erasmus Influence Humanism
The works of the Dutch humanist Desiderius Erasmus, often titled the
Praise of Folly, Erasmus's seminal pre–Reformation essay examines aspects of Church teaching as
well as aspects of worship which Erasmus deems worthy of the biting satire he utilises
Erasmus was unrelenting in his criticism of pedantry, sophistry and demagoguery among both
clerical and secular figures.
Rediscovery of Aristotle and the birth of humanism in the renaissance
The influence of Erasmus on humanism during this time was so great as to ensure that Northern
Renaissance humanism came to be labelled Erasmian. A movement which, unlike its Italian
counterpart and predecessor, would place faith and piety at the centre of theology and would place a
large emphasis on ad ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It will describe the role of Erasmus in the reformation and Erasmus's unease at his position
straddling the ever–increasing divide in Western Christendom between the traditionalist Catholic
position and that of the Reformers.
, placing Erasmus in either camp, given his reputation as simultaneously the intellectual godfather of
Reformation thought and his ostensible life–long loyalty (despite his persistent criticisms) to the
Roman church is innately problematic.
Erasmus's own view of Praise of Folly is a subject of much dispute. Going by his own writings it
seems unsure just how seriously he expected that particularly work to be taken. Certainly its
theological merit is utterly overshadowed by much of the rest of his body of work.
Hard to know how much import Erasmus himself attached to the work given his writings hence and
it place as a relatively insignificant part of a substantial corpus of work over his life.
The power and potency of Praise of Folly and the effectiveness of Folly as a serious messenger were
perhaps inadvertent on the part of the author.
It's more important historically then literarily.
Already in chapter 40, under the guise of continuing frivolify and without any change of tone or
style, Erasmus has thrown in a list of pious superstitions, quite long enough to make a thologians
hair stand on end
Chapter 48 with its attack on pretentiousness 'forms the heart of the satire'.
We can't use

Grace, Free Will, and Human Nature: Three Significant...
When the Renaissance dawned over Europe's Dark Ages, half a millennium of intellectual thought,
long unchallenged, found new opponents on all sides. Aided by the printing press, fresh ideas in
science, art, and religion spread freely across the Western World, falling under the scrutiny of an
ever–expanding population of the literate. With this widespread intellectual excitement came greater
individualism, more celebration of human achievement, and stronger focus on the secular world–a
major shift from the heaven–focused outlook of the Middle Ages, in which people felt they were
little more than the feeble playthings of fate. But are human beings really able to change their
destinies through their choices? Are they capable of good? Three ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He then explains that with the proper preparation, fate can be held at bay, and he provides an
example of a river that often floods. Although nothing can be done when the flood has already
come, the calamity can be prevented altogether if dikes and dams are built up in strategic places
beforehand (Machiavelli 85). In this chapter, he also mentions that, in general, men are successful
when their methods are suited to the circumstances. Therefore, if a man can adapt to new situations
by becoming flexible enough to know when his usual methods will not work, he will have more
power to navigate changing affairs (Machiavelli 85–86). The attitude presented in The Prince brings
up an interesting paradox: although Machiavelli champions the free will and cunning of the elite
prince, he seems to hold the autonomy of the masses in low esteem, assuming throughout his book
that mankind in general is selfish, simple, and unreliable–the opposite of the cool, calculating prince
that Machiavelli idealizes. In fact, almost all his advice to the aspiring leader seems to be based on a
completely pessimistic view of human nature, perhaps because Machiavelli thinks it safest to
assume the worst. For example, on page 59, he writes, "For this may be said of men generally: they
are ungrateful, fickle,

How Did Erasmus Criticize Church
Desiderius Erasmus The Renaissance was a time of rediscovering Classical ideas and styles.
Inspired by many Classical philosophers Renaissance authors used their work to criticize society.
One of these such authors was Desiderius Erasmus. A young man, priest and author, he wrote tales
that questioned and criticized social acceptances including the conduct of church leaders. His work
inspired people like Martin Luther to change society. Let's delve into the life of this satire author.
Desiderius Erasmus was born October 27, 1466 as the illegitimate son of a priest. As a youth he
attended varies Catholic boarding schools and was ordained as an Augustinian Monk in 1492. After
traveling to Paris to work and study he decided to take a different approach to life and became an
independent scholar. He wrote many speeches and books, while also acting as a tutor across Europe.
This famous author passed away in Basel Switzerland on July 12, 1536. Before his death Erasmus
wrote multiple praised pieces of literature. Two of Erasmus' most famous works are entitled In
Praise of Folly and Julius Excluded from Heaven. The former is a tale of a young woman named
Folly. She is said to be a fool and to act as a fool. The latter is a tale that points fun at Pope Julius II.
It contains the Pope trying to gain access to heaven through his wealth ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He writes as a call to reform, or at least bring the problem to light. Erasmus' In Praise of Folly is
actually a condemnation of human folly, which he makes fun of in the title. He attacks every
character regardless of class. This includes church officials. This is also true in Julius Excluded from
Heaven, where he makes fun of the Pope while exposing his faults. His use of satire is very common
today. It adds comedy to serious subjects. His attack on church officials and ideas had a large
influence on Martin Luther's reforms, which changed society

Charlemagne Compare And Contrast
Charlemagne, the greatest Emperor of Western Europe. Another name for Charlemagne was Charles
the Great because of all that he offered to the Christian/western Europeans. Yes, there is a book
written to talk about his magnificent accomplishments, which is The Two Lives of Charlemagne.
The book is taken into two different accounts. It displays the writings of both authors, Einhard and
Notker the Stammer. Both writings have similarities as well as major differences. Today, I will
illustrate a comparison and contrast between the two accounts that the book was written in and how
that affects the viewpoints that the character, Charlemagne, is seen as.
Einhard was the first person to write about the life of Charlemagne. He was a member of the court
as well as a known scholar. He lived to be loyal servant to Charlemagne while living in his palace.
Einhard saw loved and appreciated ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Einhard describes the historical context and personal experience. Einhard's version is a bias because
he only describes the good attributes to Charlemagne. Additionally, Einhard shows Charlemagne as
the return of the Roman Empire. Furthermore, Einhard was a member of the court as well as
Charlemagne's dedicated servant so he feels compelled to say everything great about Charlemagne.
The fact that Einhard decides on which facts are important to keep and which are to be left out. For
example, when he decided to not speak about the childhood of Charlemagne. It is significant to
remember this when reading Einhard's version of the story.
The Notker had a certain vision when writing his version of the story. His main focus was on the
actions of Charlemagne towards the religious side and the treatment of the bishops. Notker felt that
the rank was not important but the religious acts and education are more important to focus on. He
described Charlemagne as strict and then goes into the kind deeds that he

What Are The Corrupt Leaders In The Middle Ages
The Medieval way of thinking, which gave kings absolute power and authority gave way to the
Renaissance thinkers. These men not only brought their questions to the sciences and the arts, but
also began questioning the corrupt practices of the church. The corrupt leaders of the Catholic
church required their parishioners not only to tithe their money, but also to pay for the priests
services, to buy indulgences when they sinned, and to pay for other services the church provided.
The corrupt leaders in the church also engaged in immoral practices setting a poor example for the
people who followed them. With the inquiring spirit of the Renaissance, the people began to
question the immoral practices of the church, and the printing press spread

Did Erasmus Lay the Egg Luther Hatched
Did Erasmus lay the egg that Martin Luther hatched?, this is such a complex question. One would
have to take into consideration that Luther and Erasmus did not think to keenly of each other, and
disagreed on many factors. Especially with one being of the catholic faith and the other reforming
against Catholicism and protesting against the pope himself. Even though they both had their
differences, they did both conclude that there was something wrong with the catholic church and
therefore Desiderius Erasmus did lay the egg that Martin Luther hatched.
Now, both Erasmus and Luther wrote something out against the Catholic church, Erasmus writes the
satire praise of folly in 1509 , and Martin Luther writes his 95 Theses on the Power and ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pope may grant remission or take back the sin if it is to his judgement, but if the pope was
despised, the grant would remain unforgiven, leaving the pope without power. Erasmus and Luther
are making almost the exact same point, but from two different readings. In the very next sentence
in The Praise of Folly, Erasmus goes on to say,
" They measure the length of their time in Purgatory as if by water–clock, counting centuries,

Erasmus Influence On Religion
Absolutely, the role of religion in the last thousand years of human history cannot be overstated. The
wager of wars and the builder of kingdoms, religion has been responsible for many great
occurrences. Nonetheless, religion, too, has nefarious potential. The rise of the Humanist movement
meant the rise of laicism, which also meant religion and its institutions were constantly challenged –
Christianity and the Catholic Church largely came under fire due to mass corruption within the
institution. Among Christianity's critics was Desiderius Erasmus, arguably the first to oppose the
Church and one of the most influential writers of the Humanist period; his criticisms of the Catholic
Church in The Praise of Folly were derivative of his desire ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Being an educated, Catholic man of piety himself, Erasmus could not be swept aside as a heretic,
but was acknowledged and instigated a great deal of distrust toward the Church from the middle
class. Though an intellectual, Erasmus struggled while attending the University of Paris because, as
a scholastic institution, he found it stifled his imagination. His Praise of Folly was first written in
Latin, not unusual given the period in which it was written, and Erasmus was recognized as having
considerable skill in writing Latin. Since many of the texts that come from antiquity are written in
Latin, a great deal effort is put into maintaining the integrity of the original text during its translation
to English. The narrative of The Praise of Folly may be divided into three main segments: firstly,
Folly introduces herself as "the only she...whose divine influence makes gods and men rejoice," and
the crude, satirical nature of the work is established. She explains her fundamental role in all
relationships, reasoning that no one would be able to stand one another without her aid. The second
section is where the foolish banter ends and the criticisms begin; Folly chastises doctors, lawyers,
grammarians, and artists for their lack or excess of her essence, but above all she expresses her
contempt for theologians. Thirdly and finally, Folly addresses the idea that Christianity is a faith by
and for fools, with Jesus being the biggest fool of

Background Information Of The Reformation And Definition
Background Information of the Reformation and Definition
The Protestant Reformation, known simply as "The Reformation," began in 1517 with Martin
Luther's publication of the 95 Theses. Major players in this pivotal point in European history
included Christian humanists such as Desiderius Erasmus, the Kings of France and England, the
Holy Roman Emperors and at the center of it all; the Catholic Church. Luther's publication of the 95
Theses, its' rapid dissemination due to the technological advance of the printing press (1440), and a
European population of lay Christians, Royalty, and Clergy alike primed to take on the excess and
singular religious hold of the Catholic Church, created a firestorm of change that swept throughout
Europe and significantly changed the practices of the Catholic Church. According to a current
publication of PBS.org, Martin Luther "plunged a knife into the heart of an empire that had ruled for
a thousand years, and set in motion a train of revolution, war and conflict that would reshape
Western civilization, and lift it out of the Dark Ages."
Desiderius Erasmus (1466–1563) was a Dutch born scholar who actively supported the Northern
Renaissance philosophy of Christian Humanism. Christian Humanism "emphasized human dignity,
beauty, and potential, and reacted against the religious authoritarianism of the Catholic Church" by
using "the principles of classical learning to focus on biblical studies, theology, and the importance
of individual

King Charles Hatred For King Desiderius Of The Lombards
Obviously King Charles is filled with hatred for King Desiderius of the Lombards because of the
plot against him with his own brother and with a request from Hadrian, the Bishop of the city of
Rome asking him to wage war against the Lombards to bring peace to Rome. Charles wages war
against the Lombards and does not stop until King Desiderius and his son Adalgis, the last hope of
the Lombards, are driven from not only Italy but from the kingdom of the Franks. Charles now
names his son Pepin as King of Italy. Einhard's description of this war shows clearly that Charles is
truly a human being that is dedicated to the people whom he makes promises to and facing the
difficulties that Charles along with his armies did while crossing the Alps continued

Protestant Reformation
The Protestant Reformation during the sixteenth century established a schism between Christian
beliefs that lead to the emergence of divergent interpretations of the Bible. Through this
transformation the Papacy was prosecuted for its unrelenting and restricted renditions of the gospel
that was seen to oppress the populace and corrupt the true meaning of God's Word. Though there
were individuals such as Desiderius Erasmus who greatly criticized the Catholic Church yet
remained loyal there were others who broke away entirely. With the increasing dissatisfaction across
Europe factions began to be founded providing elucidation on the "truthful" interpretations of the
Bible. Two various factions were known as Lutheranism after German priest ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Luther was against the Catholic Church and the Romanists who he claimed specifically built three
walls around themselves. Of the first wall Luther criticized their claim that nothing within the
earthly realm had sway over them. Through this belief their spiritual place on earth, assigned by
God, was of greater importance and held absolute power over the temporal. He also disagreed with
the Catholic belief that only the pope could interpret the scriptures and that for one to commune
with God one must do so through ecclesiastical members of the church. Furthermore, Luther
believed that the Romanists evading an assembled panel through claiming that only the pope could
call together council was unjust. Through these three intricate and carefully established walls Luther
claims "the Romanists have cunningly stolen our three rods from us, that they may go unpunished"9
as they are untouchable by the people. By being unable to dismantle these protective walls and
engage the papacy in questioning of their actions "they have settled themselves within the safe
stronghold...so that they can practice all the knavery and wickedness"10 which was seen to be
populating the lands and living within the populace. Luther also observed that the Word of God was
all a soul needed for salvation and the need of Works was not required nor justified. It was through
knowing "that all you need is

A World Lit Only By Fire
A World Lit Only By Fire by William Manchester is not only informative of the conflicts that
occurred in Europe, but it is humorous and includes perspectives and anecdotes that are not viewed
as impartial. It is structured into three separate sections: The Medieval Mind, The Shattering and
One Man Alone.
The first section effectively talks about the substantial events that occurred in the year 500; this
includes the fall of the Roman Empire and the reasons that lie behind its fall. Manchester continues
on by speaking of the Dark Ages that instantaneously followed the collapse of the Roman Empire.
He speaks of the Black Death and how Europe experienced multiple "climatic changes", such as
severe flooding. The second section contains ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Erasmus ridiculed those who thought this way, a tactic he used skillfully in order to gain more
followers. He published a book named Encomium Moriae, translated as The Praise of Folly. The
book was originally created to amuse Erasmus's friend, Thomas More. The book includes a
bantering tone and clearly attacks theologians of this time period. The mere thought of this book
angered the priests and of course, this did not stop Erasmus from spreading his statements of
ridicule across the lands of which he travelled. It did not take long for Erasmus to target Pope Julius
II, nicknamed "The Fearsome Pope" and "The Warrior Pope". Erasmus produced a skit that was
created to ridicule Pope Julius II to all extents; it was named Iulias exclusus. Soon after Pope Julius
II's death, the skit spread like wild fire amongst the communities, quickly becoming the hot topic of
various cities. The Roman Curia of the Holy See were very displeased with Erasmus and his actions.
The Curia acted in the name of Pope Julius II, so when they learned of Erasmus's cruel jokes, they
longed for Erasmus to stop his nonsense and spend the rest of his days in remorseful piety
(Manchester 126). Society as a whole in Europe was ruled by utter confusion and things were fairly
unstable during this time. The people followed rules that they so blindly believed and in a nutshell,
the people committed acts that would most likely be viewed as absurd and

Desiderius Erasmus: Christian Leaders
There are many ideas surrounding the facts of what Christians believed in the early 17th century.
Two outstanding writers, Desiderius Erasmus, an important Christian Humanist, Catholic priest,
social critic, teacher, and theologian, and Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat who earned a
reputation for deviousness, both preach their different views on how Christian leaders should act.
Today, I will discuss why Erasmus's views are more preferable to Christian leaders in the early
1600s.
In Erasmus's book, The Education of A Christian Prince, Erasmus strongly emphasizes his views on
how he believes a Christian prince should act and behave. Firstly, Erasmus deals with how a
Christian prince should handle war and tolerance in his community. On ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As a Catholic priest, Erasmus believed that since God wants people to have free will, a prince
should obey these same ideas as well. His fourth idea involves how the best ruler must emulate a
philosopher and he believed in equality and in how the ruler nor his subjects are above the law.
Lastly, Erasmus resonates with the fact that predestination is wrong. Why would God predetermine
and choose certain individuals over others to ascend into Heaven? He strongly supports the idea that
no one deserves to be saved and that we have all sinned because we are

The Reformation Of The Church
The reformation of the Church during the 16th century was one of the most religious, political, and
cultural disturbance that occurred in Europe. The structures and the beliefs of the people of the
Catholic Church would be questioned and redefined in many ways. During this era of time, men
such as Desiderius Erasmus and Martin Luther, would have a significant impact on the plans that
occurred. Erasmus was a reformer who believed in free will and that man could be saved by grace
and good works. Luther, a revolutionists, believed that one can only be saved by grace alone. Hans
Behem,––a man who believed in social equality not only in the spiritual world, but also in the
outside world––was a revolutionist. He was a peasant who had a say in the ways of the church and
worked to reveal to the people that there should be a no social hierarchy in society. These three men
were outspoken and determined to have their thoughts not only revealed to the world, but also to be
followed. They each had different views, beliefs and ways to express their efforts of change, but
similarly worked hard to reveal their thoughts to the world. Desiderius Erasmus is known as being
the foremost humanist in Europe during the 16th century. As a child he received an excellent
education and when he had gone to one of the best Latin schools in the Netherlands, he learned
Greek and also about the importance of having a personal relationship with God. When he was
older, he wanted restoration of Christianity

How Did Erasmus Influence The Church
Desiderius Erasmus was born in Holland in 1466. Margaret, his mother, was the daughter of a
physician and his father Roger was a priest. He was given a semi–monastic teaching and at a young
age, his father sent him to a Latin grammar school. Erasmus had little time with his parents due to
the plague that killed them both in 1483. After his parents died, the guardians with whom Erasmus
was being cared by were persistent about him becoming a monk. In 1492, Erasmus took the holy
vows of monks at the canonry of Stein in Holland. He was soon ordained a priest and poverty was a
big factor in his decision to enter the monastery. In the adult years of his life, Erasmus was a
traditional scholar who studied and resided in France, England, and Italy. 1516 was a major year for
Erasmus. He prepared to release copies of the New Testament in Latin and Greek versions. By
translating the New Testament into Greek and Latin, it presented a new reasonable and logical idea
of the Christian doctrine. This raised questions that would later on impact the Reformation greatly.
Erasmus used the theoretical methods invented by Italian humanists to help his understanding and to
help others further understand the New Testament and the Church. His ideas and discoveries set the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Erasmus tried to encourage the other Christians to strive to become as equal as possible to Jesus. He
viewed and taught that the Gospels and the religious sacraments as doorways to Jesus but that the
Church demoralized them with unnecessary and pointless rituals. In Erasmus' eyes, the best
technique of learning how to be a good Christian was the reading and the understanding of stories of
Christ from

Desiderius Erasmus's Accomplishments During The Renaissance
Desiderius Erasmus was an orphan from the Netherlands, forced into monastic life because of
poverty; yet, somehow, he became who most consider as one of the greatest humanists of the
Renaissance. The Renaissance was a time of rebirth starting in Italy. It is the period of time in
Europe between the Middle Ages and modern time. During the Renaissance, there was a boost in
arts, science, and intellectual activity. The Renaissance embraced humanism, an interest in human
society and spread of ideas, and one of the greatest humanists was Desiderius Erasmus. Desiderius
Erasmus was important to the Renaissance because of his theology, literature, and teachings.
The first way Erasmus embodied humanism is in his theology. He was constantly opposing ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He spent a great amount of his life devoted to teaching. When working in the clergy, the pope
allowed him to travel to France, where he became a scholar. One of his students gave him some
money so he could become a, "scholar moving from city to city tutoring, lecturing and
corresponding with some of the most brilliant thinkers of Europe" (Erasmus Biography,
biography.com) This made him a humanist because one of the most important parts of humanism
was education. Even while traveling, he wrote many works, furthering his teaching. In the summer
of 1511, Erasmus went to "teach at Cambridge and lecture in theology." (Erasmus Biography,
biography.com) Teaching at Cambridge made Desiderius a great humanist. There, he taught
theology and Greek. Even though he spent much of his time writing, he was even willing to provide
private lessons to assist his students'

Martin Luther And The Protestant Reformation
The Protestant Reformation was a time of change and development throughout Catholic Europe.
The changes included religion, politics, and culture, defining Europe entirely. It took a brave person
to get change, Martin Luther who challenged the Catholic Churches in their Christian practices.
Luther argued for a change in church's power, this lead to an abundance of wars with this issue.
Reformers wanted the power to put in the hands of pastors or Christian leaders. This back and forth
problem led to the Counter Reformation, which was the intense response to Protestants. 2017
marked the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther's historic 95 theses. However, there are various
factors/leaders that contributed to the growing popularity of the Reformation, such as: Meister
Eckhart, Jan Hus, and Desiderius Erasmus.
Meister Eckhart (1260–1327) who was a German mystic, theologian and philosopher. He played a
crucial role in the reformation of Catholic Churches. His work was proven effective in leading to
Martin Luther's perspective of the reformation. Eckhart's sermons discussed man's direct contact
with the divine. He influenced many people during this time, such as: John Tauler, Henry Suso,
Nicholas of Cusa, and Eckhart Tulle. Eckhart works include: "The early Quaestionrs Parisiensis",
prologus generalis in opus tripartitium", prologus in opus propositiomun, and prologus in opus
expositionum. Also, Eckhart was influenced by many people: Thimas Aquinas, Pseudo–Dionysius
the Areopagite,

Castiglione Vs Machiavelli Essay
In between the 14th and 17th century, a time period known as the Renaissance occurred, in which
modern literature, art, and music were revived and thrived throughout a large portion of Europe that
founded several differentiating ideas and views throughout its time. From the mid–1400s to the
mid–1500s several authors arose with varying views on how the government should act; however,
views such as these were strictly prohibited by both members of the Catholic church and Protestant
reformers, and were often viewed as heretical, which led to threats and attacks from these people as
a result. The recorded writings of three Renaissance authors, Niccolò Machiavelli, Desiderius
Erasmus, and Baldassare Castiglione, hold both similar and differing ideas, most notably on the
politics and government in their time.
Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince and Desiderius Erasmus' The Education of a Christian Prince were
written to educate the current and future princes on how to act and behave. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Erasmus was one of the first Christian Humanists and was a part of the Northern Renaissance, and
therefor outputted both his humanistic and Christian views into the creation of The Education of a
Christian Prince. Erasmus and Machiavelli both had differing views on war and toleration. Erasmus
believed that war was foolish as he stated in The Praise of Folly, and should be avoided at all costs,
and perhaps this was because the majority of his life was spent surrounded by war in the early 16th
century, and was said to have seen a couple hundred war soldiers tortured at the hand of a local
bishop. On the contrary, Machiavelli thought war to assert power and dominance, and that by
looting a city after raiding it he or the prince could gain his soldiers' trust,

Leonardo Da Vinci And The Renaissance
Roughly between the times of the 14th and 17th centuries a cultural movement called the
Renaissance existed. The Renaissance housed some of the greatest intellects, such as Leonardo da
Vinci, and a radically different way of thinking emerged. Humanism developed largely and rapidly
among this time, and was greatly influenced by a man named Desiderius Erasmus (1466–1536).
Erasmus, a Dutchman, originally lived among monasteries where he developed many opposing
views during his years of service. In the midst of the Renaissance, around the 16th century, the
Reformation movement began to splinter the faiths of Europe. Some say that Erasmus bridged the
ideals of the Renaissance and Reformation movements. Among his many contributions to the
humanist drive, he wrote many colloquies originally intended for teaching Latin to school children,
which doubled as underlying preaching of Erasmus's ideals. A collection of a variety of these stories
entitled the "Ten Colloquies" written by Erasmus shows specific examples of the tethering of
Renaissance to the Reformation largely on the theme of ad fontes.
One of Erasmus known standards was the importance of going back to the sources. During the
Renaissance, born in Florence, this was very common thought, as it was a period of admiration of
early Greek and Roman culture, intellect, and art. This began to pave some of the ways of many
reformers mainly as they begin to question the practices of the Catholic Church. Many began to
question where

Taking a Look at the European Renaissance Essays
The foundation for the concept of modern humanism was established during the Renaissance in
Europe, which took place during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The European Renaissance
indicates a milestone in the shift of the human thought process. During this time period, people
became less focused on matters of theism and more focused on exercising philosophies of reason,
individuality, and learning. Numerous people developed an interest in a philosophy known as
humanism, also referred to as humanistic studies or the humanities, which challenged the structure
of society, especially when considering the role of the church. Such ideas sparked responses from a
multitude of people that were beginning to doubt the arrangement of European ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Humanists believed that this ancient literature could reveal what was needed to live a moral and
effective life, as well as serve as a model for Latin style. Knowledge of the classics was coveted and
pursued by the intellectuals of Europe. The revival of ancient Greek and Roman texts, as well as the
spread of humanistic ideals, during this time period could not have been accomplished effectively
without certain advancements in technology that occurred during the Renaissance.
The humanist movement spread throughout Europe with incredible speed and sparked a number of
changes in society. The Gutenberg Printing Press was instrumental in the spread of humanistic
philosophy throughout Europe. During this time period there was an explosion of printed materials
and by the year 1500, around forty thousand titles and approximately eight to ten million copies had
been printed. These changes, though arguably inevitable, might not have proceeded with such
momentum without the aid of several key individuals that aided in the expansion of humanist ideals.
Francesco Petrarca, commonly referred to as Petrarch, is considered to be the father of modern
humanism. However, one might not think this of Petrarch when taking his solitary nature into
account. Petrarch was a member of the Stoic faction of humanists. This group of humanists relied on
reason alone to achieve gratification. Though Petrarch was a member of this group, he never really

Martin Luther And Desiderius Erasmus
Martin Luther and Desiderius Erasmus make an unusual pair; Erasmus a polite and cautious scholar,
Luther a bold and outspoken priest. Because of this, Erasmus's pacifism can be quite appealing. He
can seem the hero trying to free us from the slavery of God's unapologetic will. However, when the
points of their dispute are disassembled, one would find that Erasmus lacks a strong biblical
argument; many times due to his attitude towards the topic. Luther's zeal is found to be a huge asset
in making and defending his claims, which he absolutely believes to be the truth of Scripture. For
this reason, and others I will note, Martin Luther certainly composes the superior biblical argument
in this debate of free will. Before I go any further, the criteria for a good biblical claim must be
established to show this is the case. The primary attribute of a satisfactory biblical case is that it
must draw its strength and authority from the Bible. If authority is shifted off of Scripture, it will
surely follow that the assertion becomes less biblical. Yet, to separate what the Bible truly says from
the interpretation of those making the argument can be exceedingly difficult. This leads directly into
the second criteria: Any interpretation of the Bible must be consistent with what has been recorded
in the Old and New Testaments. A conclusion that is not so must not have been interpreted correctly,
and therefore has no value in this consideration. Lastly, to construct a sound

The Black Death
Throughout history there has been many events that caused changes in the culture and livelihood of
the human race. The Black Death was one such event. The spread of the disease killed millions of
people, and caused many religious, social and economic upheavals. The pandemic is thought to have
first originated in Central Asia and travel along the Silk Road by the means of trade. The shifting
climate patterns at the start of the Little Ice Age may have contributed to the severity of the disease.
The Black Death has occurred more than once in the years since the middle ages, but hardly caused
a high mortality rate. It would take Hundred and fifty years till Europe would reach the population it
once had prior to the pandemic. At the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The fact that there were three different types of Y. pestis which strike at different times of the year,
caused the death toll to rise. "The bubonic, which was only transmitted through fleas that fed on
brown rats was common in the spring and autumn months. Pneumonic plague can strike at any time
of the year, by the transmission through human contact. The last type is Septicemic which kills each
victim and tends to happen with localized epidemics (Stock)." The idea that rats caused the spread
of the plague is widely believed to today but in the medieval world this was not considered. Instead
people believed that they were being punished by god and or Jews and witches were behind the
disease. In the Medieval world there was no explanation for the Black Death. Many saw it as a
punishment from god for committing sin. On the other hand, people also started to blame the Jewish
population, they were arrested and even killed. The movement known as the Flagellants started in
Germany. The people of this movement believed that the Black Death was the work of God and
walked town to town. They would then congregate in the town square and whip themselves in order
to cleanse through self–mutilation to ask for forgiveness, but instead only spread the disease more.
The Black Death almost immediately had economic impacts. A power shift from the landlords to the
peasants occurred due the lack of people to work the fields. Landlords had to offer better incentives
then

Impact of Martin Luther
"Luther was a German patriot. He was never a nationalist in the modern sense of the word. Luther
was, above all, a pastor, professor of theology and iconic figure of the Protestant Reformation.
Luther has been variously identified as an advocate of absolute monarchy, democracy, individual
freedom, intellectual repression, nationalism, internationalism, spirituality and secularism. He was a
religious figure; his battles were fought over theological issues that may seem to us obscure but
whose implications touched every area of life, individual and corporate. Some people consider
Luther to be the apostle of absolutism, some later autocrats certainly claimed him as a founding
father" (Wilson, 2007 p. 19). Hergenhahn (2009) showed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Over the years scores of university students lodged with the Luther's and it is thanks to some of
them that we have the celebrated Table Talk, a collection of obiter dicta on all manner of subjects
with which the great man regaled his guests at meal times" (p. 20).
Phillips (1970) says "Desiderius Eramus (1466–1536) a Dutch humanist, he was an ordained priest
of the Roman Catholic Church and studied at the Univ. of Paris. Erasmus combined vast learning
with a fine style, a keen and sometimes sharp humor, moderation, and tolerance. His position on the
Reformation was widely denounced, especially by Martin Luther, who had first looked on Erasmus
as an ally because of Erasmus' attacks on clerical abuse and lay ignorance. Erasmus was finally
brought into open conflict with Luther and attacked his position on predestination in On the
Freedom of the Will. Then Luther came to understand justification as entirely the work of God. This
teaching by Luther was clearly expressed in his 1525 publication On the Bondage of the Will, which
was written in response to On Free Will by Desiderius Erasmus (1524)" (p. 24).
Important note and this was interesting, but I do not remember where I read it but it said something
like "If Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever–is any other position than Luther's
possible?" –

How Did Erasmus Use Folly to Criticize the Catholic Church
How did Erasmus use "Folly" to criticize the Catholic Church of his Day? It may seem odd or
different to admire and acclaim Folly, but there is a definite benefit to foolishness: the freedom to
tell only factual information. In Praise of Folly, Erasmus put this independence to good use in
repeating to the readers, a civilization significantly besmirched by mature worries, that a person is
unable to serve both God and Mammon. He leveled over his irony by promising us that "there is
merit in being attacked by Folly" (7), and closed with the recap that "it's Folly and a woman who's
been speaking" (134), a renunciation that permitted him to be as brutal as he desired to be in his
condemnation. He definitely found necessity for severity, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
"Spiritual goods" such as devout knowledge are not good business sense: "How much money," Folly
asks, "can he make in business if he lets wisdom be his guide, if he recoils from perjury, blushes if
he's caught telling a lie, and takes the slightest notice of those niggling scruples wise men have
about thieving and usury?" (114) The traders instead displayed a sophisticated understanding to
outfit their gluttony. Erasmus also criticized

Compare And Contrast Erasmus And Luther
Erasmus and Luther on The Reformation
Religion was understood as the upmost critical part of a person's life during the European Middle
Ages. Christians believed the only way to Heaven was through good works. To gain penance for
their sins, Christians would travel on pilgrimages to complete a journey to a holy site. When popes
began to abuse papal authority during this time, Christians could pay indulgences to be forgiven of
their committed sins. Papal authority had been corrupted by practices which were not Biblical
through proposing that Christians could be saved by payment, and not by accepting God's grace.
Because of these actions, attention was drawn to the foundations of the doctrine of the Church. The
Church was in need of fixing. Two reformers, Desiderius Erasmus and Martin Luther, spoke out to
do this. Both Erasmus and Luther desired to reform the church because they had similar viewpoints
on the abusive power. The way that the two decided to go about reformation was different. Erasmus
was poor, humanist, and reserved, whereas Luther was not poor, a theologian, and bold. Although
Erasmus and Luther shared a common goal for Christians to live by the scripture, similarities and
differences were present in their approach to church reform due to their past experiences, education
received, and amount of audacity.
To begin, the past experiences of Erasmus and Luther affected their approach to reformation.
Desiderius Erasmus was born in 1466 and died in 1536.

The Protestant Reformation Essay
During the Reformation period, there were a few individuals whose ideas had a great impact on
society. Two of these people are Martin Luther and Desiderius Erasmus. While they shared similar
ideas about what religion should be, there were also ways in which they differed.
Martin Luther was an extremely intelligent man, who gave up law school to become a monk. He
created some turmoil in the Catholic Church community with some of his ideas on what religion
should be. Using the printing press as his weapon of choice, Luther looked to spread his ideas
around to the common man. One of his ideas that the Church considered to be radical was his theory
that there was no need for a priest. Luther also believed in a sort of pre–destination, in ... Show more
Luther and Erasmus had ideas that were very similar to each other. They both believed that the Bible
should be read by the common man, not just regulated towards the clergy and the rich. They were
also strongly against the ideas of indulgence that the Church had been using in order to gain
finances. The two had felt that there was no real need for the Church, and that each person could be
spiritually satisfied or cleansed by just praying and doing good deeds. Even when Luther had posted
his greatest work, 95 Theses, Erasmus was a silent supporter.
It was also during the time of the 95 Theses that the two had started to separate on their stands
against the Church. When the Pope had asked Luther to retract these statements, Luther looked
towards Erasmus for his support. Erasmus declined though, mainly because he was too afraid to
stand up against the Church. During this time, the Church was by far the most powerful institution
in Western Europe, and going up against them certified a person's death sentence. Instead, Erasmus
would prefer to keep his support silent.
While both of these men had very similar ideas but different methods of execution, there is no doubt
about their contributions towards the idea of Humanism. Erasmus' ideas were essentially what
Humanism was all about, and his various works of literature, such as The Praise of Folly. He was
even known as "The Prince of Humanists." Humanism itself had directly impacted the Reformation
period in which

How Did Erasmus Influence Humanism
Born in the year 1466, Desiderius Erasmus was thrust into the height of the Northern European
Renaissance. His first years of life were spent living in Rotterdam, Holland; which is where he got
the nickname Erasmus of Rotterdam. Among other names, he has also been called the Prince of
Humanism and of course his supposed birth name of Gerrit Gerritszund. Gerrit Gerritszoon changed
his name when he was christened to Desiderius Erasmus; Desiderius derived from a Latin word
meaning longing, and Erasmus derived from a Greek word meaning desire. Desiderius Erasmus is
known by many to have been a humanist, theologian, scholar, and a teacher. Though he had many
accomplishments, the most significant was that Erasmus led a theological revolution, which was a
huge part of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Renaissance Humanism was an intellectual movement of the thirteenth century. The idea behind the
Renaissance Humanism was that the study of classic Greek and Latin texts would provide the
people a well–rounded outlook of both ancient and modern ideas, instead of blindly following a
religion. These ideas ran through the veins of his writings and books; especially in his book entitled
The Praise of Folly that he wrote in 1509. The word folly can be described as acting like a fool due
to a lack of common sense. Erasmus used the main character, the mistress named Folly, to harshly
ridicule the Church and criticize the philosophical beliefs surrounding Christ. It was a brilliantly
twisted idea, and it worked. Folly attempts to deceive and trick the reader into thinking that all
people are incompetent, and are just blindly following religion without truly understanding the
meaning behind it. In the following quote, Erasmus uses Folly to try one last time to warn the reader
of the folly that is bestowed upon religious followers through the Church and

Erasmus: Live Learn Love Essay examples
Desiderius Erasmus, a man of few spoken words, wrote many arguments about how the church was
being run. He felt that everyone acted "godly" and thought that they were above people. He
critiqued not only those in the church, but many broad generalizations of people as well, citing the
bible. Most of Erasmus' disdain for the way things were run was due to the circumstances he was
raised in. With his "The Praise of Folly" Erasmus shows his humanistic worldview, as well as tells
people what they should change in order to live a better life. Erasmus was born in Rotterdam to
unmarried parents. His mother was a widow, and his father became a priest sometime shortly after
his birth. His father was a devotee of Italian humanism, who knew Latin ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Erasmus uses his work "The Praise of Folly" to criticize the many people of the time, that did not
follow the teachings he had or gave. Erasmus began to ridicule and denounce the church's
immorality and wickedness, as well as other categories of people: "The merchants are the biggest
fool of all. They carry on the most sordid business and by the most corrupt methods. Whenever it is
necessary, they will lie, perjure themselves, steal, cheat, and mislead the public. Nevertheless, they
are highly respected because of their money. There is no lack of flattering friars to kowtow to them,
and call them Right Honorable in public. The motive of the friars is clear: they are after some of the
loot..." Among other people he ridiculed, he ridiculed lawyers, philosophers, and

Purity and Civility in The Praise of Folly by Desiderius...
Purity and Civility in The Praise of Folly by Desiderius Erasmus and Of Cannibals by Michel de
Montaigne
Both in "The Praise of Folly" by Desiderius Erasmus and "Of Cannibals" by Michel de Montaigne–
relating to the common point to which attention is tried to be drawn–inquiry of true civility with
regards to the Nature and its necessity according to certain circumstances are substantiated.
First of all,Erasmus stating "Truly,to destroy the illusion is to upset the whole play.The masks and
costumes are precisely what hold the eyes of the spectators." Aspires to put forward the idea that
there is a definite pact between people–which can be rather called as a concious illusion–on wearing
veils of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"I am not sorry that we notice the barbarous horror of such acts,but I am heartily sorry that,judging
their faults rightly,we should be so blind to our own.I think there is more barbarity in eating a man
alive than eating him dead;..."
Such a frank kind of reasoning seems to be too much striking at first,since Montaigne goes even
further in justifying the behaviour of the cannibals and degrades that of modern men's.As acts of
modern men are degraded by likening them to eating a man alive.
"...as we have not only read but seen within fresh memory,not among ancient enemies,but among
neighbours and fellow citizens,and what is worse,on the pretext of piety and religion."
It is to be discerned that Montaigne also satirizes the conflicts which were brutal between Catholics
and Protestans as something to be despised and dishonouring.Yet,he advocates that modern men –
ignorant of his own barabarity which exceeds that of the cannibals' – justify themselves calling the
cannibals savage and barbarous with regards to the rules of reason.
"So we may well call these people barbarians,in respect to the rules of reason,but not in respect to

The History Of Western European Religious Landscape
During the 15th and 16th century, Western Europe was a cauldron of mixed ideas and emotions. The
enlightenment and cumulative effort of individuals of that time produced different ideas contributing
to the renaissance or re–birth of religious doctrine. Change was instigated by various Italian
humanists or Popes of the era, norther humanists such as Desiderius Erasmus, Martin Luther, John
Calvin, Henry VII, and Queen Elizabeth I were some of the participants that changed the paradigm
of Western European religious landscape. Like the secular despots, popes engaged in war and, when
that failed, diplomacy. They brought artistic riches to the church but also lowered its moral tone by
accepting bribes for church offices and filling positions with kinsmen. But above all, these popes
patronized Renaissance culture. Three of the most aggressive and successful of these popes were
Nicholas V. who founded the Vatican Library. Pius II often considered the most representative of the
renaissance popes because of his interest in Greek and Roman classics he practiced both war and
diplomacy with astounding success and Sixtus IV who came from a powerful family and increased
his personal power through nepotism. Unlike the Italian humanists, the northern humanists were
preoccupied with the condition of the church and the wider Christian world. These northern thinkers
researched and studied both Christian writings and the Greco–Roman classics, and their scholarship
was meant to further the

Erasmus And The Renaissance Humanism
Desiderius Erasmus, believed to be the illegitimate son of a Priest named Gerard, was born around
1466 in the Netherlands. He is also believed to have been born with a different name, and his
birthday is unknown because he was born out of wedlock. Despite this, his father made sure he had
a good education by sending him to a prestigious Latin school when he was 9 years old. However,
when Erasmus's parents died, he was sent to live with guardians who strongly believed that he
should become a Monk. During this time, Erasmus gained a personal relationship with God but was
opposed to the strict rules and teachings of the school. Poverty eventually forced Erasmus into a
monastery in 1492, where he was ordained a Catholic priest. He then became the secretary for
Henry de Bergen, the bishop of Chambray, which allowed him to travel across Europe for the next
ten years to study Latin and literature. These studies led to his discovery of Renaissance humanism.
In the early 1500s, not long after his travels, Erasmus was invited to lecture in theology at the
University of Cambridge and it was during this time that Erasmus began to publish literature
showing his some of his new ideas and criticisms of society and the church. These ideas started to
become well known after he published one of his early works, Praise of Folly. His ideas stood out
from others of the time and sparked debate all over Europe. These ideas are strikingly similar to
those made famous by Martin Luther, however, as

During The Reformation Dbq Essay
Individuals and groups of a society can promote change of the status quo. Many people took action
and spoke out against issues within society during the Reformation. The Reformation was a
movement in the 16th century where people called out the Roman Catholic Church on its unjust
teachings. These people include John Wycliffe, Geoffrey Chaucer, and Martin Luther. The Church
did not approve of this criticism and aimed to eliminate those who defied the Church. In the first
document, John Wycliffe claims that the Church is contradicting itself. He claims that the Church is
engaging in behavior that does not comply with what they preach. John also claims that the pope is
wrongly considering himself the head of the Church. Wycliffe speaks out against ... Show more
The popes believe that the indulgences are positive because they provide an opportunity for those to
have their sins forgiven. In document seven, Martin Luther criticizes the pope and the Church for
their use of indulgences. Luther claims that people are falsely being forgiven for their sins with the
use of money. He thinks this is teaching the false doctrine of money being more important than
ethics. People should be forgiven by God, not by money, and should do so through helping the
needy instead of buying the indulgences. Document eight, Pope Leo X's response to Martin Luther,
states that Martin Luther's comments and motive is the work of the devil. He thinks Luther is a
threat to the Church and orders him to stop preaching. Pope Leo X realizes that Luther is a
legitimate threat and tries to undermine his credibility. In the ninth document, Luther claims that the
pope's response shows that he is the Antichrist. He claims that the pope has no real evidence to
prove he is heretical. Luther is getting the attention of his followers and is showing that the
corruption within the Church is no joke. Despite threats of punishment, Luther shows resilience in
his pursuit for the improvement of the

Desiderius Erasmus Research Paper
"The desire to write grows with writing". Desiderius Erasmus was famous for
writing and he admired it much. This quote is referring to him because he
loved to write and when he wrote he gained more love for it. Desiderius Erasmus was a
known humanist who was the greatest scholar of the northern Renaissance. Desiderius Erasmus had
an important and interesting life and it all started during his early life. He was born October 27,
1469, to Roger Gerard and Margaretha Rogerious in Rotterdam, Holland. He was the second
illegitimate son of Roger Gerard, his father, which whom was a priest. He went on as far to be the
third highest class at the chapter school of St. Lebuin in Deventer. Two of his teachers were
humanists. Jan Synthe, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1499, a pupil, William Blount, Lord Mountjoy, invited Erasmus to England. This is where he met
a Thomas More, Erasmus and More became friends for life. John Colet quickened Erasmus thought
to be a primitive theologian, one who would expound scripture but not in a argumentative way of
scholastics but in the manner of Jerome and the other Church Fathers, the ones who lived in an age
when men still understood and practiced the classical art of rhetoric. The impassioned Colet brought
him to lecture on the Old Testament at Oxford, but the more paranoid he was made him not ready
even more. He went back to the Continent with a Latin copy of St. Paul's Epistles and the conviction
that "ancient theology" required mastery of Greek. By 1502 Erasmus had already settled in the
university town of Leuven which is now in Belgium and was reading Origen and St. Paul Greek.
Erasmus urged leaders to inject into the vitals, the teachings of Christ by studying and meditating on
the scriptures using a spiritual interpretation. He sailed for England in 1505 trying to find support
for his studies, he then found an opportunity to travel to Italy instead. He published many books
using satirical dialogue and an example of that is "Julius Exclusus e coelis" which was published in
1513–1514. In the end of his finalized work the second edition of Erasmus' New Testament (1519)
replaced

Unilever Internship Essay
I am very excited about the opportunity to become a Marketing Intern at Unilever. Having been
informed about the opportunity through Unilever website Career section and through Unilever
LinkedIn profile, I felt immediately compelled to apply. I see this opportunity within Unilever as an
excellent foundation to involve myself in actual tasks from day one, to have real responsibility, work
on real projects and make a big impact and to become a part of an energetic, creative and passionate
team of Unilever that encourages innovative thinking.
Why Unilever and Unilever International Internship Program Marketing – UIIP
What inspires me in Unilever is its huge impact in consumer lives, reputation, great history and
working environment I would like ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, as a student, I have gained a valuable work experience in marketing, being a
Marketing and Communications associate at Vostok TK. As a Marketing and Communications
associate, I created marketing materials and assisted in developing marketing strategy, which has
enabled me to gain practical experience in marketing apart from my education. This experience has
strenthened my good business sense and sense of urgency. Moreover, I have a hands–on experience
in managing corporate communications channels for major Russian companies with a huge
customer base (with daily reach around around 770 000 listeners and 497 000 listeners), including
websites with around 130 000 unique visitors daily and social media. This experience has enabled
me to enhance my communication skills and will help me to effectively support Marketing
Communication where high level of responsibility is recuired. I am also experienced with social
media being a founder and social media manager apart from my education and professional
experience. I have founded and managed an online community (social media group) of 500 people
for 5 years during my Bachelor (Specialist) studies, and

Erasmus: The Fool
The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries were ripe religious turmoil within the Catholic Church as many
had begun to question practices that had arisen over the centuries, which had focused more on the
material and physical devotion to God rather than a spiritual connection. It was a time of great
advancement in art and literature as Europe was entering the Renaissance and began to prosper both
economically and culturally. During this time humanists began to question teachings made by
Church officials in regards to everyday life and piety that one must follow a specific guideline in life
so as to enter heaven upon death. These humanists emphasized a focus on human form and the use
of reason to dictate their lives as they saw fit rather than ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Praise of Folly, he writes that those who are "called religious or monks. Both names are false
since most of them are a long way removed from religion." It is from this carnal delight that people
are happiest and not Bosch's interpretation that this delight results in being condemned to hell. In
addition, Erasmus believes that no man was above these earthly desires, including religious men or
men of power, despite their best efforts to remove themselves from the 'lowly' desires of the
plebeians and

Folly Vs Erasmus
Erasmus in The Praise of Folly did something that was very different from writers before him and
created a piece that was written differently, free thinking, and went against the authorities of the
time. Erasmus created a piece that is truly modern and inspires other free minded individuals to
write freely and express their own beliefs.
In The Praise of Folly, Erasmus created a piece very different and very innovative for the time.
Erasmus may have been the author of this piece, but he was not the narrator, instead it was Folly that
was the narrator of this work. Comparatively to works seen in the middle ages where works were
typically about religion and the narrator played a very small part on the work. Also, it was atypical if
there was

Thomas More Paradox
Thomas More wrote his ideas in 1516 in England. He was the son of a lawyer and had his education
at Oxford. He followed his father's footsteps and turned out to be an excellent lawyer. He became a
respected writer, historian and philosopher as well, and wrote many important books. During this
time he made numerous important friends, such as Desiderius Erasmus, and became an adviser of
King Henry VIII. More was very religious, and a leader of the counter reformation. This was quite a
paradox, since persecuting protestants was about as opposite to the religious tolerance described in
"Utopia" as it could get. Europe and England were both still based on the feudalistic system in
which the rich nobles had all the power. The life of the poor was

Similarities Between Martin Luther And The Praise Of Folly
Martin Luther's Concerning Christian Liberty and Desiderius Erasmus' The Praise of Folly are about
the different lines of attack on the Catholic Church. Martin Luther was a North German Augustinian
friar, a Catholic priest, and a professor of theology who protested the abuses in the Church and
called for reform. Erasmus was German by birth, interested in acts of good, wanted to find common
factors between reason and Christianity, focused on the bible in its original papal form, believed in
human correct ability, and did not believe in original sin. He highly criticized the Catholic Church at
this time and called for reform, as well. They both attacked the Roman Catholic Church in their
works; however, Martin Luther wanted reformation in practice and doctrine, while Erasmus wanted
a moral reformation in the Church. Concerning Christian Liberty and The Praise of Folly were
written in the early 1500's and they both focused on the subject area of religion.
Martin Luther poked at the Church practice of the sale of indulgences, which was the full or partial
grant of the forgiveness and pardoning of the penalties of sin. He did this with the 95 Theses. The 95
Theses were ideas that Luther posted on the Church doors in Wittenburg, Germany stating that he
wanted the Catholic Church to change their current corrupted ways. "To Luther, the sale of
indulgences made a mockery of God's gifts, so he took a stance against the abuses of the Church
with his work." The situation surrounding the theses were the activities of the Roman Catholic
Church. The Catholic Church was highly criticized by Luther in his work because it became too
powerful and there was corruption in the system. The Church became less religious and became
more of a political entry, making the Church ruthless. Luther believed that the Church should
become concerned about the general well–being of the Catholic people and that salvation should be
for everybody, not for the people who buy their way in using indulgences. In Concerning Christian
Liberty, he discussed the wrongs, like corruption, of the Catholic Church to Pope Leo X. "You see,
however, which is called the Court of Rome, and which neither you nor any man can deny to be
more corrupt than Babylon or

The Influence Of Humanism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tara Hardin

More from Tara Hardin (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Influence Of Humanism