Infinite Truth

Infinite Truth
Infinite Truth
Since the dawn of philosophical thought there has been a desire to find truth. Now exactly what
truth is depends upon whom you ask. Philosophers have been searching for truth in various forms
for at least as far back as Aristotle in the first century B.C. all the way up to Carl Hempel in the 20th
century A.D. To Aristotle and Plato truth was reality; To Descartes truth was found in God; To
Hempel truth was found in explanation. None of these are accurate and yet all of them point toward
the same truth. Reality, as defined by Plato and Aristotle, God, as proved be Descartes and ideal
explanation as modeled by Hempel, all allude to the same thing. They point out that mankind is a
finite being and that truth is only ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Descartes states in the beginning of his proof that all things clear and distinct are true. That is no
more accurate than saying that all ideas that are ambiguous to someone are unconditionally untrue.
He also states, the existence of God depends on the clarity and distinctness with which we perceive
the idea of God. Therefore, if to me, it was not clear and distinct then it would not necessarily be
true. But the clarity and distinctness of our thoughts depends on the existence of God. This seems to
be a very circular argument and is dependent on the existence of God to prove the existence of God.
Again human perception falls short of truth. Do people understand truth more in more modern
settings? Over the course of the 20th century Carl Hempel came up with two models of human
explanation that he organized as ideals. Bas Van Fraassen puts forth a few problems with the
models. The problems he states are; asymmetry, relevance, low probability, and legality. These are
not the problems with the models. The real problems come from, as Hempel puts it, "the universal
laws invoked can have only been established on the basis of a finite body of evidence, which
surely affords no exhaustive verification". (Balashov, pg. 51) He also says that because of this all the
laws used in the deductive–nomological method of explanation are all only probabilistic. This
means that the only method that Hempel actually explains is his probabilistic method. Since all
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Truth And Truth About Truth
When a person is told something is the "truth" the definition of truth may vary from person to
person; however, it is generally something that a person believes. What is the nature of this "truth"?
How do us people know when something is the truth? These questions will be answered in this
paper using two different approaches and how I interpreted them. In this paper I will describe what
truth is and how it is attained by using two different sections of my reference, then I will combine
them into what I think truth is as a whole. "The whole purpose of reasoning, of logic, is to arrive at
the truth of things". This is what the author of "Being Logical", my reference for this paper, has
described what "truth" is. The whole point of logic is to curve at the truth of what is being stated. He
then goes on to say "Not to pursue truth would be absurd, since it is the only thing that gives
meaning to all our endeavors". I agree with this statement, because even though the truth is not
something that we want to always hear, it is something that is needed to be heard. Later on in the
same section he says "logical truth, as we have seen, is a matter of a correspondence between the
content of a statement and the objective facts". He described this understanding of the nature of truth
to be called the "coherence theory". "The coherence theory of truth maintains that any given
statement is true if it harmoniously fits into an already established theory or system of thought". The
theory

What Is Truth About Truth Essay
What is Truth? What is truth? Simply, it is knowing that something is right or wrong. But is it really
that easy? The answer is as no. The problem with truth is it has a long history and has been a central
issue in epistemology. In the first century, Jesus Christ was on trial, and in the gospel of John,
chapter 18:38 Pontius Pilate asked Jesus Christ: 'And What is Truth'? Ever since then, many
philosophers have attempted to answer the question. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of
philosophy "Truth is one of the central subjects in philosophy. It is also one of the largest. Truth has
been a topic of discussion in its own right for thousands of years. Moreover, a huge variety of issues
in philosophy relate to truth, either by relying on theses about truth, or implying theses about truth."
by Michael Glanzberg in the article Truth. So, what is truth? How do we explain the types of truth,
objections to truth, and tests for truth? Luckily, throughout time all of these questions have been
talked through from the greatest of minds. One now knows that truth isn't as simple as connecting
one dot to the other. Truth goes beyond the measurable. Truth has many definitions but can they all
be right? Truth has a long definition which is why it is hard for many people to understand the
question of, "what is truth?" Andrew Uduigwomen states in his journal, "Today, in all areas of
human endeavor, 'truth' has become the standard of measuring the success and acceptability of

Comparing The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth
The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth When a parent thinks about protecting their child, they
may not consider protecting their child from the invalid information that is being taught in schools
across the nation. There are many factors that go into publishing an academic textbook, but many of
these factors rely solely in the political roots of the publisher. Textbooks today aim to impress
children with vivid images and information that is easily understood and related to. Leaving out vital
historical information from a curriculum could harm a student severely in the long run. The thoughts
and beliefs that a person constructs are based on prior knowledge and personal experiences so
leaving information about the past is robbing a student the right to understand our country.
Adjustments are certainly needed to be made in the approach of teaching crucial historical
information throughout the nations' classrooms. These adjustments would ensure that generations to
come are not doomed to repeat the mistakes made by past century political figures. This essay is
sure to intrigue by deliberating the skewed information covered in academic textbooks, the way
Columbus is taught in schools, and the deception of the severity of global climate change. Thinking
about how people with power control the potential knowledge of children in classrooms today could
really leave a person wondering what other skeletons the government has in their honorable closet.
Growing up, children are

Descartes Truth
Descartes: Knowledge is Truth
With the emergence of the scientific revolution in the 17th century, views of society and nature were
transformed throughout Europe. There were great developments in mathematics, physics,
astronomy, biology, and chemistry. The world and its views were changing, and with that change,
came a new change in thought, a new change in philosophy. Apart from ancient Greek philosophy,
which was centered on finding order in a vast variety of things by searching for a fundamental
amalgamating principle, Descartes sought to establish order via some fundamental division.
Descartes understands and expresses that what we know about our mind is more definite than what
we know about the world outside our mind. Descartes' ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These preconceived notions keep us from "the knowledge of the truth" (Descartes 193). In order to
access the truth, we must doubt everything. Doubting everything will lead to the distinction between
mind and body. Once you recognize that distinction, you will recognize that "neither extension nor
shape nor local motion, nor anything of this kind which is attributable to a body, belongs to our
nature, but that thought alone belongs to us" (195). This thought that we have produces ideas, and
these ideas are given to us by God, they are innate. Since God gave us this "faculty for knowledge
[...], it can never encompass any object which is not true" (203). For we are able to see the truth
clearly and distinctly this way. Descartes argues that God would be a deceiver if what he gave us
was able to be distorted and that we can mistake what is false as true. This is not the case, because
God is not a deceiver. Some would argue that people do believe things to be true when in fact they
are false. This, however, is not the doing of God, it is of our own free will, and it is what Descartes
calls "errors." Errors do not rely on our intellect, but rather on our own will. Ultimately, doubting
will lead to deductive reasoning, or a series of logical statements eventually

The Truth In The Things They Carried
Truth can be defined as something that is not false, however, whether something is false or not is
subjective. Therefore, truth itself is also subjective, as it depends on the perspective and judgement
of the person. In the book The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien, the truth is incomprehensible,
and unclear which events occurred and which didn't. Yet, this doesn't depreciate the points he is
trying to get across. "All you can do is tell it in more time, patiently, adding and subtracting, making
up a few things to get at the real truth" (81). O'Brien points out how the point of a story is to relay to
the public the significance of the event, and even if the actual event is changed, the truth is still
intact. In any situation, each person believes that what they see is the truth, and therefore the way
the interpret the situation given their experiences is valid. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
O'Brien says how "a true war story, if truly told, makes the stomach believe" (74). Consequently, the
stories shared are often exaggerated, but are still legitimate because they aim to relay the feelings
the person has about the topic and emphasize the points that are most significant to them. This
further increases the understanding of the audience and aids them in understanding the magnitude of
the situation for the speaker. O'Brien displays this when describing his decision on going to war. He
says, "At some point we must've passed into Canadian waters, across the dotted line between two
different worlds" (53). Although we don't know whether O'Brien actually went on this trip, there is
no doubt that he was conflicted over going to war. This scene helps visualize this internal strife and
gives an insight into his perspective, making it the truth. Thus, something can be true if the
sentiment and relevance that corresponds with it is in accord with the message the author wishes to

The Importance Of Truth In The Matrix
Knowledge is defined as a true justified belief; however, what if it were impossible to differentiate
between truth and falsehood? The Matrix addresses this question when Neo awakens from the
Matrix and discovers that he has been living in a false reality. He is told that this new reality is the
truth, and that his life in the Matrix was simply a computer program controlling his thoughts and
actions (The Matrix). The Matrix presents the idea that truth is equivalent to objective reality, in
contrast to Kierkegaard's belief that only subjective truth combined with faith is necessary.
However, both the movie and Kierkegaard believe in the importance of taking a leap of faith. In the
movie, truth is shown to be reality, but they do not explain how to know when you are living in
reality, because it is impossible to be entirely sure that you are living in reality. In the movie, truth is
revealed to be reality, the world as it actually exists, or, life outside of the control of the Matrix.
While Kierkegaard presents the belief that the only truth that matters is subjective, the Matrix claims
that only objective truth matters (Kierkegaard). Reality is an objective subject, and the Matrix is
subjective due to its existence as merely a computer system in a person's brain. Therefore, according
to the movie, truth is our objective reality. Morpheus tells Neo that reality is outside of the Matrix
and claims that all those still living in the matrix are enslaved by the machines (The

Pragmatism And Truth : The Pragmatist View Of Truth
Pragmatism and Truth The pragmatist view of truth, as written by William James in "Truth is
Established on Pragmatic Grounds," is the view that the best way to define truth is in terms of
beliefs that work. In other words, truth becomes a human manifestation of individual beliefs, where
people believe what is better to believe, so long as it doesn't clash with another "vital benefit"
(Mulvaney, 297). I will argue that the pragmatist's interpretation of the truth allows for confirmation
bias to take hold, and subsequently leads to a manipulation of truth where individuals pick and
choose the most beneficial ideas over evidence. When writing about truth, there is a distinction
made between ideas and beliefs. James attempts to define it as he writes, "Truth, as any dictionary
will tell you, is a property of certain of our ideas. It means their 'agreement,' as falsity means their
disagreement, with 'reality.' Pragmatists and intellectualists both accept this definition... They begin
to quarrel only after the question is raised as to what may precisely be meant by the term
'agreement,' and what by the term 'reality,' when reality is taken as something for our ideas to agree
with." (Mulvaney, 297). In this way, truth becomes a series of an individual's ideas that agree with
one another to construct a certain reality, which James acknowledges may be debated further. Of
course, the truth is not entirely subjective because there is a lacking verification of the individual's
belief,

Justification And Justification For Truth
What is the problem of the criterion? The problem of the criterion is that any claim to truth must be
justified in order to be shown a claim to truth. This justification, however, requires an argument
which needs to be justified it as a legitimate way to show the original claim to truth. The problem of
the criteria can be quite disturbing, because the validation that was provided then have to be
justified. Meanwhile, if there is no proof to know that the justification that was given is true; then
the justification is not true. Also, if that justification would not be true then the original claim would
be false though you have to justify that justification. For example, it would be like if you have a
building and your foundation is cricked ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since the problem of the criterion remains infinite, it is impossible to establish a concrete solution.
Furthermore, the problem of the criterion as previously stated, is known to be essentially any claim
made that is the truth, then you have to provide justification. Meanwhile, the justification you have
provided then have to be justify. Montaigne then questioned the infinite process of the problem of
the criterion. He goes on to say, "Will it be the case that certain chosen appearances govern the
others? That choice would have to be verified by another choice, the second by a third, and so this
will never be accomplished" (Montaigne, 161). Montaigne emphasized on the fact that if you make
a claim of the truth; a justification needs to be provided, which then need to be justified. The same
process will be repeated, every time someone makes a claim about the truth. The main reason why
the problem of the criterion is most likely to be described as an infinite regress is because of the fact
that any claim of truth need a justification. Also it must be justified itself. If there is no grounding, or
ultimate justification, for the content of our norms and customs, the result is that they are completely
arbitrary. Despite the arbitrariness of the society 's norms, the Pyrrhonian still follows them. Why is
this so? The main reason is that as long as an effort is made to justify the claims to truth, success
cannot be achieved. Montaigne said, "I always

Tim O Brien Essay On Truth And Truth
What is your definition of truth and fear? People have different views on truth and fear and have
definitions. Truth is something that is true it's the state of being true. FEar is something that scares
someone to do something. Like when someone is scared to go into a haunted house. They might
have a fear of haunted houses. Tim O'Brien thinks that something isn't true unless it feels true. He
thinks that something can happen and not be true. Even though Kiowa, mitchell, and Rat are all
fictional O'brien is trying to show us that they are made up but there's truth to their characters. Plato
believes ¨Humans are the measure of all things.¨ Measuring something giving it value– good, truth,
beauty, and existence. This essay is going to be about analyzing fear and truth presented by O'brien
and Plato. O'brien thoughts on truth and fear can be different from other people. He thinks that it's
not true unless it feels true. "A true war story never feels moral." Moral means "concerned with the
principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character." For the
fear part In the war its very scary and something O'brien said was ¨I hated the draft but at the same
time it's something that made every american take war seriously." Meaning the draft would scare
guys but they would take it seriously. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Truth is the beginning of every good to the gods, and every good to man." Plato thinks that it is also
good to the gods. He must believe that only good men tell the truth, so that isn't always a lot of men.
When it comes to fear Plato said ¨courage is knowing what not to fear." Meaning if you have
courage you would know what to not fear, and what to fear. This is very different to what people
may think if fear. His beliefs towards fear is different towards the war and what Obrien feels
towards the war and towards fewar in the

Truth Is Truth
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple", claims Oscar Wilde. Truth is very complicated, as
people understand it in different ways. Truth is a statement, which never changes and does not
depend on people's feelings. In other words, truth is reality and the action expressed without any
changes or edit. The matters that people can accept as truth are what they believe. For instance, if
people are not sure about events they need to have foolproof statistics, facts or evidence; as a result,
"truth", is a conviction in which people believe and which is impossible to make false. "Whatever
else realists say, they typically say that they believe in a correspondence theory of truth" (Putnam,
1978, p. 18). At the same time, the question "does my truth is also truth for others?", or "does their
truth is also truth for me?" can mislead people since they have already accepted and comprehended
their own truth individually. Telling the truth and accepting it is a very complicated issue as people
define the word "truth" differently. Firs of all, scientists have always been engaged in defining
"truth" throughout history and philosophy up to modern times. The etymology of the word "truth"
covers 20th century. "Aletheia", which means truth, was used in ancient Greek philosophy and ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
" Truth" can be defined as "reality", however it is mentioned that mathematical truth does not always
relate or correspond to the reality ,"truth in science" which help us to reach the final conclusion or
"logical truth" which is utterly true and abstract meanings of truth such as "justice", "freedom" or
"liberty". People understand their truth as they do want or accept and "truth" does not have an
ultimate meaning. As Galileo Galilei states "All truths are easy to understand once they are
discovered; the point is to discover them" ,the main question is to discover your own

Myth Of Truth Analysis
Truth has always been a very vague and grey area for many people, it's something that cannot be
agreed on by every single person. Each person has their own set of past experiences that have built
upon their morals, values and ethics. This ties in with their overall idea of why they view truth and
lies in the way that do. Professor Hedrick is interesting in the way that she teaches literature through
the historical point of view, proving background information that enables students to build upon this
background knowledge and find the interpretation for that piece of literature. Much like our
differing viewpoints on the concepts behind truth and lies can be connected to differing
interpretations over a certain work of literature. But when truth ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Knapp, et all, Lying, 54 The idea of concept of lying, deception and truth as a grey area was
introduced and throughout the interview Professor Hedrick stuck to her stance of truth depending on
the person in question. Our journey through life has heavily influenced the ever–changing stance
over truth. Knapp, et all, Lying, 57 Throughout the interview she spoke about her seeing changes in
the students, in their ideas, how they evolve in just a semester. Ethics to her is like a scale, it needs
to be constantly adjusted, adapted and balanced. Much like her students writing styles, she sees their
speech, their viewpoints over the world change drastically in just a semester, some students regress
and others thrive. Their interpretations open up and they come up to her with what they thought but
she is no stranger to the lies students tell. In her long career, she has had many outlandish lies told to
her, what students will do to get out of trouble or an extension on an exam or extra credit. The idea
of lying to an authority figure that could end in severe consequences is a lie that many students
would not think of before but when they enter the college scene, they change; some students would
do anything to get a little extra credit. It's part of her job to be vigilant for the possible lies students
may tell in an attempt to take advantage of her. This

Nothing But The Truth
"Nothing But The Truth" was written by Edward Irving Wortis or "Avi". It was originally published
by Orchard Books in 1991. "Nothing But The Truth" was re–published by Scholastic Inc. on January
1, 2010. The story is about how a ninth–grader boy's suspension for humming the national anthem
during homeroom turns into a bigger deal than it really is. The main character of the story is Philip
Malloy. He lives in Harrison, New Hampshire with his mom and dad. In the beginning of the book,
he was obsessed with making the school track team. Philip wants to impress his father and also
wants to improve his chances of going to college. Philip spends his spare time training for track
tryouts and reading Running magazines. Philip has a cocky attitude ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Every morning at Philip's school the national anthem is played and everyone is asked to stand at
"respectful, silent attention" while the song is playing. On the first day in Miss Narwin's homeroom,
Philip starts humming along to the national anthem with the hopes of irritating Miss Narwin. Miss
Narwin tells him to stop and he does. The next day he does this again and he doesn't stop when Miss
Narwin tells him to. When he doesn't listen, Miss Narwin sends him to the assistant principal's
office. Again, Philip does the same thing the next day and he is sent to the assistant principal's office
for the second time in that week. This time the assistant principal asks Philip to either apologize to
Miss Narwin or be suspended for two days. Philip chooses the suspension. Then, the assistant
principal calls Philips mother and she brings him home. Philip thinks that he should not have been
suspended and he tells his parents this in an exaggerated way. Philip's parents take his side and they
approach Ted Griffin, who is running for the school board. Ted Griffin happens to be talking to a
reporter from the local paper at the same time. Ted is interested and asks Philip to tell the reporter
his story. The reporter writes the slanted story and it is published in the local newspaper with a few
alterations. The story then becomes a big deal and is picked up by the national

Things They Carried Truth Vs Truth
In The things they Carried, we are presented with a plentiful amount of stories. Stories that are hard
to believe and ones that make you feel a certain way. Tim O'Brien does a great job of making the
reader think when reading these stories, the thought of the theme and truth of the story and what the
real truth is. Throughout the book there is a present difference between the story–truth and the real
truth. O'Brien makes this very clear when telling us how to determine a war story as well as in the
story's told. I think the real truth is what the person believes to be true, that person being the reader
This is the truth that easy to see, easy to read, and isn't very exciting. Believable but with no affect
on the reader. This truth doesn't ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe the meaning of this and why many people not just O'brien stretch the truth of stories is
because sometimes truth is bland, and even if it's believable it doesn't have an impact on you. You
just hear the real truth. The story truth is something you can picture, something you can imagine
every bit of and view the experience like you were in their shoes. You can feel the guilt or emotions
the writer might have had. The story truth makes you feel and think and not just read but be
involved with the story entirely. Sometimes in books and stories the truth is hard to imagine, if
O'Brien were just to say that war was horrible and that many men died I wouldn't feel anywhere
near what the story truth could make you feel like. When O'Brien described the man he killed, and
when he gives short descriptions of men he's seen die it brings the story to life a little more. Even if
the truth is slightly manipulated it seems more real because it makes you feel like you knew
somebody. So in reality, what seems more truthful, really isn't the truth and the simple truth feels
unimportant or even boring at times. In the real truth emotions are overlooked and one must really
read between the lines to feel what the author meant for them, but the story truth is written for a
reason, to make you feel what they felt, and that's the

Sojourner Truth And The Truth
Sojourner Truth was born in New York; around 1797, she was sold into slavery at an early age. She
had many owners over the years. She married another slave from another farm and they had 5
children. After several years she ran away from her owner and went to work for a family as a maid.
When she later became a free person, she became a Civil Rights Activist for women. Sojourner
Truth was known for spontaneous speeches on racial equal opportunities. She was known for her
speech "Anit I a Women "This speech was first given to an Ohio Women's Rights convention in
1851. This is the life of events of Sojourner Truth, and how she was and still to this day remembered
for all the work, and speeches she gave on injustice (bio, 2016).
Sojourner Truth Sojourner Truth's given name was Isabella Baumfree; she was born into slavery in
Swartekill, Ulster County, New York. She was one of several children born to James and Elizabeth
Baumfree. She was sold several times in her childhood, was married to a slave named Thomas, her
slave owner picked him out, together they had five children. In 1799, New York wanted to abolish
slavery. Emancipation was finalized on July 4, 1827. Isabella's owner did not grant her freedom on
July 4, 1826, as he promised; Isabella escaped with her daughter Sophia. Isabella went to work for
Isaac and Maria Van Wagener, one year later, New York law emancipated all slaves, when Isabella
tried to get her small son Peter, he had been sold into slavery in Alabama.

Is Truth Objective Or Subjective?
George Pippin
Professor Hays
HMXP 201
June 28, 2015
Is truth objective or subjective? Is there one truth for all of humankind or is truth subjective? Is there
a subjective right and wrong to everything or is right and wrong dependent upon one's religion,
morals, and culture? This is a question that has been debated for years and a topic that many have
devoted their careers and lives to. I believe truth is very much subjective. Almost everyone has
beliefs or truths that they are unwilling to compromise. Why is this? Is it because everyone is
searching for the one ultimate truth or is it because what is truth to one simply is not truth to
another? During this essay, I will show how one's religion, morals, and culture play a part of how
someone discovers their own truth. Religion is something that has been around since the beginning
of time and will be here until the end of time. People of faith use religion to answer questions like
why are we here, how was the earth created, and what is the ultimate purpose for life. Nevertheless,
just as there are many truths, there are many different religions. If you were to ask a Christian how
the earth was created, they would tell you that God created the earth. However, if you were to ask a
Hindu how the earth was created, they would say the that there have been many earths before this
one came into existence. Both the Hindu and Christian believe whole heartily that their truth is
correct. However, who is to say either of them is

Tangerine Truth Quotes
In the novel Tangerine, Edward Bloor expresses the themes seeing and truth. He expresses seeing
the truth because Paul who people think is disabled, knows the truth. He knows that his brother Erik
and his friend Arthur are murderers and thieves, and that his parents pay attention to Erik and not
Paul. Paul can see what his parents "can't or won't".
Truth Paul knows the truth about a lot of things. He knows how Mike Costello and Luis Cruz died.
But, the kids from Tangerine middle know the truth about how Luis died. He knows the truth about
his whole family. Erik is a murderer and a thief. His mom is selfish and only worries about her
appearances, and his dad pays no attention to Paul at all and is obsessed with "The Erik Fisher
Football Dream". ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When he was little, his eyes were damaged by him looking at an eclipse so now he wears goggles.
People think Paul has disabilities because when he moved to Lake Windsor Downs Middle School,
his mom wanted a private tour, so she told them that Paul is blind, now he has an IEP. But, on page
11, it states, "step out front and take a look. And smell the air.". This is proof that Paul isn't blind and
his mom knows he's not blind. Paul's eyes were not actually damaged from an eclipse. Erik is
responsible for damaging his eyes by having his friend Vincent spray paint into them. His parents
were lying to him for years.
Seeing the Truth "The Erik Fisher Football Dream" People don't know the background of Erik. Erik
is a killer, a thief, and a bully. He calls Paul eclipse boy, and makes fun of Joey because his brother
died. When Arthur killed Luis, Paul, Joey and some of the Tangerine kids knew Arthur killed him
and Erik was involved. Erik and Arthur also were glad when Mike died because they both benefited
from it. One time Paul had a flashback, it was about someone in a mask trying to kill him, and that
someone was

The Truth In 'The Drawer Boy'
The truth is the hardest medicine to swallow, yet it is also the most effective medicine to take to
heal. But the truth often is covered up by lies and ideas created by people that are afraid. Their
efforts to cover up the truth usually fail horribly, causing more problems to arise. The bitter taste of
the truth worsens as the lie is seen through, but the lies still try to hide the terrible secrets. Some lie
to prevent others from getting hurt, others lie so that they have another reality to believe, and some
lie so they never have to be faced with the truth. An amazing literary example of the usage of lies is
"The Drawer Boy" by Michael Healey, where one character named Morgan dug himself a hole that
was almost impossible get out of without ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Accident or not, both Sally and Frances who were best friends and destined to be married to Morgan
and Angus, ended up leaving because of how dangerous and unpredictable Angus was. "I hit my
Sally and you lost your..." Morgan "Yes."(Act 2 Scene 3 Page 59) As soon as Morgan started to let
the truth out, he witnessed what he knew would happen, Angus feeling absolutely devastated and
guilty, blaming himself for the girls leaving. He has wanted to protect his mentally unstable friend
from learning the truth, but it all collapsed and the truth desperately needed to come out, no matter
how hard it

The And Of The Truth
One of the ways many of the early scientists were the same was they each had a knack for fully
accepting unproven theories as fact in their search for the truth. Even though each sought new,
unheard of, or at least not well defined answers to what were, in many cases, new and unasked
questions, they did so with one portion of their findings already defined. Even Descartes, claiming
to believe only the things that were proven without a doubt (35–38), behaved similarly to so many
other early scientists in this regard. They almost all allowed one questionable theory to dictate the
search for and even the presentation of the truth as they saw it. While Frances Bacon was proud of
the accomplishments he and others had made, and even looked dimly on Greek philosophy because
it was "most adverse to the inquisition of truth" (23), he saw things differently in his faith in God.
Newton, still a believer, even though he chose to believe that ancient scriptures had once contained
the truths he believed lay in mathematics, and that others in the church had hidden the knowledge
regarding these truths (48). Galileo himself thought that science should be used as an instrument to
interpret the Bible (344), even though this didn't shield him from the repercussions all these
scientists must have, if not feared, at least taken pause at the possibilities. Families and friends must
have tried to persuade these brilliant men to think before they spoke, no matter the beliefs they held.

Truth Is Not Moral Truth
Merriam–Webster defines truth as "the property of being in accord with fact or reality." With one
universe, which follows a definite set of laws, only one reality exists. Therefore, with one reality,
only one, absolute truth exists. In recent years, with "social progress," truth has been under attack.
Many are not willing to accept the truth as it is, as they view absolute fact as offensive and
emotionally damaging. People are told that truth is relative; they are encouraged to tailor the truth to
their opinions, not accept truth as fact. Truth decays from black and white, yes and no, to an infinite
spectrum of gray area. In this gray area, as nothing is absolute, nothing truly exists, as everything
becomes personal interpretation. Truth is not merely being in accord with reality, it is reality itself
and without truth, tyranny rules over relationships, life, the value of life, the perception of society,
and justice.
Truth creates the foundation of trust required for such communities to exist as families, cities, states
and country. Discussions around our dinner table often encompass the meaning of truth and the
opposite of truth, relativism. Parents frequently impress upon their children that they must "tell the
truth" in trivial matters, with the hope that these children one day grow into honest, productive
members of society. But, why is truth so important? Truth exists as the basis of trust and no
meaningful relationship can exist without trust. A functional

Truth Essay
Truth
The question of right and wrong has been battled over for centuries. Many conservatives still believe
that truth is absolute, while others disagree, saying that truth is relative. I believe that truth is an
individual's perception of beliefs and decisions.
For that reason, truth differentiates among individuals thorough their contrasting opinions. But, truth
is something that everyone believes to be correct. Thus, it greatly depends on what's true in the
minds of the people. On the contrary, truth that's spoken with bad intent is considered to be worse
than a lie. Hence, truth is an expression, symbol or statement that corresponds to reality and
happiness.
Truth is dominated by one's subjective thoughts and beliefs. It is a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Nevertheless, I also consider truth to be absolute, and therefore, it is never right to do wrong. Truth
is the purity that differentiates between right and wrong. "Absolute Truth" is true regardless of what
we believe and think. Absolute truth stands on its own. In the sense, absolute truth is absolutely true
no matter what evidence there is for it. Truth is what corresponds to the facts. Truth does not change
just because we learn something about it.
Also, truth is not always good to say. If the objective of telling the truth is to hurt someone, then it is
considered to be inferior to a most terrible lie. For that reason, while speaking the truth we should
keep in mind that it doesn't hurt someone else's feelings or relations. The problem we face is that, we
feel the urge to tell the truth when we see it. But, we should try to accomplish this without
disapproving condemnations that hurt others. So when we freely express harsh judgment of another,
we are in fact talking about those negative qualities of ourselves that trouble us the most.
Likewise, care should be taken that truth that's spoken for self–satisfaction does not impair someone
else's life. Similarly, we should always bear in mind that at times lie can also be beneficial to say if,
it brings happiness to others. Hence, if the truth is spoken with the purpose of destruction of
something or someone then

Nietzsche's Will To Truth
In Nietzsche's examination of the will to truth, he questions the value of this will. Specifically, he
wonders why it is truth that we desire instead of "untruth[,] uncertainty[, or] even ignorance[.]"
Indeed, philosophers throughout the ages have attempted to investigate the exact nature of truth and
construct their own conceptions of truth through rational inquiry (at least in their own minds).
Despite the fact that many proposed theories regarding the truth would often contradict and negate
each other, there exists one underlying sentiment that all inquisitors will share about truth. That is,
the confidence that the truth is worth seeking after, because it is valuable and good. It is however,
precisely this unwavering faith in the value of truth that Nietzsche is so wary of. This is why the
value of the will to truth is the definitive question for Nietzsche. Instead of uncovering the actual
properties of truth, he suggests that the more important task is to discern whether the truth is even
worthy of such study. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When we treat something as the norm in which all other things are to be measured by, we
inadvertently assume that it is of itself above scrutiny. In reality, not only is absolute truth
unattainable, subscribing to such an impression is "standing truth on her head and denying
perspective." Thus, rather than the truth, Nietzsche suggests that value judgements should be
concerned with the "extent [that a thing] is life–promoting, life–preserving, species–preserving,
[and] perhaps even

Three Types Of Truth
"What is truth?" It is a very confusing word since people cannot definitely describe what is identical
truth. Where is the border of lie and truth which makes them different and separates them? People
tend not to tell every detail, and it makes the other party understand situation in a wrong way. For
example, one boy fought with someone in school also fell off stairs at the same time. Afterwards he
goes home and his mother asks him "what happened to him?" He just tells her that he fell off the
stairs however, this is not the exact truth. Does this kind of situations define truth? Therefore, truth
is a mysterious matter. First of all, Oliver Kim claims that there are three types of trues.
Correspondence theory of truth, coherence theory of truth and the pragmatic theory of truth:
Correspondence, states that "proposition is true if it corresponds to (or reflects) reality. If someone
mentions that "it is snowing" (the proposition), then it is true when we see the snow falling outside.
Nonetheless, what is the reality in this matter? It is true to everyone that human senses can deceive
people. Hence, it can be true that something reality does exists. Furthermore, coherence theory of
truth states, "a proposition is true if it is with other things that are considered true". Depending on
this idea whether the statement is real or not is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It interferes to people's daily life, mind and responses. It might have three types however, with it is
existence in logic; it is clearly shows that truth is an essential phenomenon. It is really hard to define
it, understand it and claim what "really" the truth is. First three paragraphs in forms that depending
on people's mind, state and mentality truth is changing. It usually differs for every person and is
always changeable depending on situation. Nevertheless, everyone accepted three types of truth, and
they apply it into their every day

Story Truth And Happening Truth Rhetorical Analysis
VEssay 2
Andy Kim
Truth and lies:
O'Brien brings the concept of "story truth" and "happening truth" in the book. He even admits that
some of his stories are not based on real stories. The analogy between story truth and happening
truth shows that he is a skilled–writer who knows the nuance of two truths, and this fact predisposes
audiences to judge what is the real truth and what is more valuable for the readers. O'Brien brings up
the question to the veracity of the stories in the book that are written by him. This builds ethos
because audiences are now aware of the existence of truth and not truth stories. "But it's not a game.
It's a form". This analogy illustrates why the author chooses to tell audiences that there are truths
and lies. The author implies that stories are like forms: there are certain ways that are more suitable
than others. Sometimes lies can deliver clearer messages than the truths.
Shifting POV and setting: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The diversity of point of view and setting gives the audience various ways to interpret the stories
and enthralls the audience to "The Thing they carried". For example, the first chapter sets in the war
and it is a view of Lieutenant Jimmy Cross. O'Brien shifts the period to post war and POV to "Tim"
in the second chapter, resolving some of the curiosities that audience might have for the post war
Life. Flashback and foreshadowing are both shown with the setting shifted. Chapter "The Thing
They Carried" is a flashback, and also foreshadows the later chapters. By connecting the flashback
and present, O'Brien highlights that the chapters are from his own memories, and builds credibility
of the

“Story Truth” and “Happening Truth” in the Things They...
The Things They Carried Analysis
"Story Truth" and "Happening Truth" in
The Things They Carried
Throughout The Things They Carried, by Tim O'Brien it is difficult to separate what is fictitious,
and what is true. During the entire work there are two different "truths", which are "story truth" and
"happening truth". "Happening truth" is the actual events that happen, and is the foundation or time
line on which the story is built on. "Story truth" is the molding or re–shaping of the "happening
truth" that allows the story to be believable and enjoyable. It is not easy to distinguish "happening
truth" from "story truth", and at times during the novel O'brien reveals which is which. On the other
hand, when the reader is blind to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Martha gave it to me herself'" (28). This makes the reader believe that the Tim O'brien who wrote
the book is indeed the Tim O'brien that is in the book, therefore this must be a true story from his
experiences in the Vietnam War. All the more, at the end of the chapter he even asks Jimmy Cross
permission to write the book the reader is looking at right then and there, "At the end, though, as we
were walking out to his car, I told him that I'd like to write a story about some of this...'Why not?' he
said...'Make me out to be a good guy, okay? Brave and handsome, all that stuff. Best platoon leader
ever'" (29–30). Like stated before, it is nearly impossible for a blind reader to distinguish the
"happening truth" from "story truth", but it is possible that Tim O'brien and Jimmy Cross did in fact
meet and talk for a day, but the honest facts may be twisted by "story truth". For example, O'Brien
may not remember his and Jimmy Cross' conversation throughout that entire day in great detail;
therefore he may have had to formulate and make up certain parts in order to fill in holes and
perhaps make the interaction more interesting. The first three words of the chapter "How to Tell a
True War Story" are, "This is true" (67). Although Tim O'Brien begins this chapter with such a bold
and clear statement, throughout the chapter he has the reader thinking and confused when he
contradicts himself by stating things such as, "In many cases a true war story cannot

False Truth In Harry Frankfurt's Book 'On Truth'
Harry Frankfurt's book "On Truth" explains how the truth is integral to living in an absolute society
and lies only create a false reality. I agree with his thesis due to the realization that lies do not only
hurt the individual but they also detrimentally alter the perception of their reality as a whole.
Frankfurt alludes to this when he says "To the extent that we believe them(lies), our minds are
occupied and governed by fictions...that have been concocted for us by the liar" (Frankfurt 78). This
is an explanation to why lies are just filler for the truth. Parker Palmer's article "Losing our illusion"
says we as Americans prefer illusions to reality (Palmer 1). I personally believe this is a half truth,
we may want to believe the easy lie but deep down we ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The illusion of education is we have an intelligent method of teaching our children but in reality we
are just "teaching to the test"(Palmer 2). This means we are not learning but memorizing just enough
so we can pass a standardized exam. Palmer is inferring that the problem is we are not gaining
knowledge, but we are buying into the fake reality that being able to pass a test is the true measure
of intelligence. Parker Palmer argument solidifies his theory we use illusions to distract ourselves
from the harsh reality of fact or truth.
Frankfurt and Palmer would both agree that our culture's devotion to bullshit may seem much
stronger than our apparent attachment to truth. Both writers agree that the truth is far more important
than the lies we tell to create a sense of safety. The false reality we create might comfort us, but in
the end if it is not based on fact it might as well not exist. "On Truth" and "Losing our Illusions"
both deliver the important message that lies, fantasy, and illusions have no place in

Truth In Ernest Hemingway's Nothing But The Truth
The two opening questions in the beginning of Nothing but the Truth conveys the message that
saying part of the truth is not saying the truth. It also carries the message that the truth is something
that the both sides agree upon. Saying the truth shouldn't hurt anyone because the truth is what
actually happened, and the truth is needed to bring justice. Throughout the story, these questions are
disobeyed. As time passes in the novel, Philip shapes the truth to his advantage, and does not tell the
whole story of the incident. This puts the country in a misunderstanding, and views Miss Narwin as
the "bad guy." As stated above, Philip's truth changes throughout the novel. In the beginning, also
what actually happened, it states that Philip was humming the National Anthem. Not only he was
disturbing the class, he was being extremely disrespectful to the National Anthem. While talking to
his friend, he admits that he was humming. "12:15 P.M. Discussion between Philip Malloy and Todd
Becker in the School Lunchroom (line) ....... PHILIP MALLOY: Here. Take a piece. Humming,
would you believe it? No way I'm staying in her classes." (P. 27–28) This case of humming later
turns into singing, as shown, "7:15 P.M. Discussion between Philip Malloy and His Parents ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, Miss Narwin's story does not get published in the papers. "MISS NARWIN: I'm fine. I
wanted to ask you if you published that story – that story that you interviewed me for. MR DUVAL:
Oh, right. Well, I certainly wrote it. And it has been filed. It was a pretty good story. All set to go
too. But then South America ... that situation ... There's no room." (P.96) As proven, Miss Narwin's
story couldn't have been filed, because of a situation in South America. The nation have only heard
of Philip's side, and has sent hurting telegrams such as the

Deflation And The Theory Of Truth
Deflation Accounts of Causation
Introduction
Several different theories accounts exist attempting to explain whether truth exists. Some of the
common causation accounts include the deflation account, reifications, covering law model and
unificationism accounts. The Deflation theory of truth states that a predicament of the truth does not
attribute the property of the truth to a particular statement. Several theories are present under the
deflation accounts of causation. They include the redundancy theory of truth and the perfection
theory of the truth. These two theories are the major dominant theory around deflation accounts of
causation. Although both theories attempt to explain and substantiate truth in a statement, the
redundancy theory is stronger compared to the perfection theory of truth. The redundancy theory is
claimed to be the first theory that came close to explaining predicaments of truth in a statement. No
other account has achieved the same fate as the redundancy account.
Redundancy Theory of Truth Also known as the disquotational theory of truth, the redundancy
theory holds that a statement will always remain the truth even before if the predictive statement
misses. The most common predicament statement used by most people is the "it is truth". For
example, when an individual says, "Snow is white," it means that snow is white and even when the
predictive statement is added it does not change the nature of the sentence (Damnjanovic, 2005).
Thus the

Truth And Moral Truth: The Fall Story
There are many types of truths. There are moral, proverbial, religious, scientific, and historical
truths. The main problem is that people take the Bible as scientific fact. The Bible is false if we look
at it scientifically, but it is true if we apply the moral and religious context. "The Fall" story is
scientifically inaccurate because of inconsistencies and false scientific facts. To start off, snakes
don't talk: "Now the snake was the most cunning of all the wild animals that the LORD God had
made. He asked the woman, "Did God really say, 'You shall not eat from any of the trees in the
garden;" (Gn 3:1–2 NABRE). This is scientifically wrong as snakes are not intelligent enough to
directly speak with humans. Also, eating from a fruit doesn't ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is a religious and moral truth behind each story. Each item in the story is symbolic, and they
interact with each other to produce an outcome and represent a moral truth. "God knows well that
when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods, who know good and evil."
(Gn 3:5 NABRE). The fruit symbolizes subjectivism because it holds the power to tell what is right
and what is wrong. This stubborn sense of truth is now dependent on Adam and Eve, instead of God.
Adam and Eve were tempted and they desired to be equal to God, and this ruined the relationship
between them and God. One religious truth is that, humans are vulnerable to sin when they stray
from God's trust and love. God increased the pain of bringing forth a child, and punished man by
making them mortal. Mortal does not include a limited life span, but also the vulnerability to sin and
be impure. Cain also represents subjectivism. He forces his will against other people until another
subjectivist who has conflicting views, attacks him. Cain killed Abel out of jealousy and envy. The
moral truth of Cain and Abel states that killing would feed the cycle of violence. When Cain killed
Abel, he was fearful that he was going to be next. This endless cycle of terror divides human beings,
just like what happened to Adam and Eve when they blamed each other for eating the

The Importance of Truth-Telling
TRUTH–TELLING 2
The Importance of Truth–Telling Telling the truth is something that comes up for the majority of us
in childhood. It is considered impolite to lie and when a lie was told, or you were untruthful, it was
often considered a reflection of your parents' moral attitudes. Unfortunately, we all seem to have
been taught differently the exact nature of a truth or lie and the right or wrong way to use that
information. In To Lie or Not to Lie? – The Doctor's Dilemma (2007), the topic of truth versus lies
by doctors specifically, is discussed. While I believe it is important for doctors to be truthful in their
dealings with patients, the 5 W's need to be explored: what and to whom is truth, how and when ...
The consequences can be long lasting if the truth is not told to patients in a timely fashion or in its
entirety. Illness can get away from you quickly with no chance to turn back the clock or simply the
chance to make amends to facilitate a peaceful exit. Doctors deceiving patients, whether by
omission or by using semi–truths, erodes trust in

Views Of Relative Truth
What are your views on truth? There are three main views around the world. The first one is
individual relativism. Individual relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are
relative to the individual. For example, what is known as "proper" to one person, may be considered
"erroneous" to someone else. Therefore, no one has the right to judge another person's morality with
this truth. The second type of world view on truth is societal relativism. Societal relativism is the
view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within the society that they
live in. In other words, what may be considered "right" in one society may be "wrong" in another.
Therefore, no one has the right to judge anyone's society's morality in this truth ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first "camp" is Relative truth. Relative Truth is, if something is true for one person, place, or
time, that doesn't mean that it's true for all people, in all places. Were as, the second camp It
Absolutism. Absolutism is the belief that if something is true, it is true for all people, in all places,
always. Therefore, no matter the person, they are to be judged the same. This truth has a basis of
"good" or "evil" unlike the other two truths. Therefore, absolutism is knowable, absolute, and is
universal. Another difference in this truth is that it never changes, it is set in stone. Unlike the other
two truths, individual relativism and social relativism. This is the truth for Christians. God decides
what is right or wrong, and no one else. "Jesus said, "I am the Road, also the Truth, also the Life. No
one gets to the Father apart from me." (John 14:6 MSG). Absolutism is the Word's view of truth, but
relativism (Social and Individual relativism) is the world's truth. For example, if someone steals in
one part of the world, it still is bad, no matter what culture there in, no matter who they are, all is
equal, because God says

Absolute Truth Essay
True or false, probably a term most people are familiar with. Such a thing seems quite simple to
comprehend, however determining whether something is true or not isn't the easiest of tasks. In
order to determine if something is false, we must first establish what the truth is. The knowledge
issue this brings up is: How do we know if absolute truth exists, and if it doesn't what type of truth
does exist? This is dependent on our perception of the situation and our ability to reason out a
conclusion. For this essay I will use science, mathematics, religion and ethics as my areas of
knowledge. I will present both aspects of this statement and conclude with my own point of view.
Firstly, let's examine why it can be deemed true but before we ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, a Christian might say, " I know Jesus Christ is my Lord and my Savior. By following
his teachings, I will enter into heaven when I die." To the Christian this may be an absolute truth.
Imposing this statement on others is where this absolute truth, to the Christian, becomes debated.
While many may agree that the Christian believes absolutely that Jesus is his Lord, they are unlikely
to agree that Jesus is everyone's Lord is an absolute truth. Proper functioning societies and
communities often rely on certain agreed–upon truths, or conditional truths. For example, the
country holds rape and murder as crimes and uses language to define rape and murder. The failure
for a society to define such terms, and agree upon their definition could result in chaos. Thus while
absolute truths may be hard to come by, and difficult to agree upon, some amount of truths are
generally required for a properly functioning society. Whether these truths are absolute or universal
is a matter that has been and will likely continue to be debated. So to conclude this aspect, I would
like to quote an excerpt from a speech made by Galt: "Existence is an absolute, a speck of dust is an
absolute and so is a human life. Whether you live or die is an absolute. Whether you have a piece of
bread or not, is an absolute. Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an
absolute. "(Galt's Speech, For the New Intellectual,

Search For Truth
The historian and the search for truth
A historian is a person who studies and writes about the past and is regarded as an authority on it.
Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as
relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time. History, in its broadest sense, is
the totality of all past events, although a more realistic definition would limit it to the known past.
Of all the fields of serious study and literary effort, history may be the hardest to define precisely,
because the attempt to uncover past events and formulate an intelligible account of them necessarily
involves the use and influence of many auxiliary disciplines and literary forms. The concern ...
The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can be shown to correspond to
experience. Standard reference works are often used to check facts. Scientific facts are verified by
repeatable experiments. E. H. Carr in his 1961 volume, what is History? argues that the inherent
biases from the gathering of facts makes the objective truth of any historical perspective idealistic
and impossible. Facts are, "like fish in the Ocean," of which we may only happen to catch a few,
only an indication of what is below the surface. Even a dragnet cannot tell us for certain what it
would be like to live below the Ocean's surface. Even if we do not discard any facts (or fish)
presented, we will always miss the majority; the site of our fishing, the methods undertaken, the
weather and even luck play a vital role in what we will catch. Additionally, the composition of
history is inevitably made up by the compilation of many different bias of fact finding – all
compounded over time. He concludes that for a historian to attempt a more objective method, one
must accept that history can only aspire to a conversation of the present with the past – and that
one's methods of fact gathering should be openly examined. As with science, historical truth and
facts will therefore change over time and reflect only the present consensus (if that).
A historical fact is a fact

Russell On Truth
Bertrand Russell discussed certain problems he found with philosophy. Russell was concerned about
how much did we really know. There is the stuff we know with our mind when we have a particular
idea, and stuff we know through actually experiencing it which would justify it. But how do we
know if it is real, or even there, for that matter? Russell says, "For if we cannot be sure of the
independent existence of object, we cannot be sure of the independent existence of other people's
bodies, and therefore still less of other peoples minds, since we have no grounds for believing in
their minds except such as are derived from observing their bodies" (Russell, 47). How can Farmer
Brown be sure that the dairyman just didn't have an idea ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
This brings us to knowledge of things. Russell believed that "all of our knowledge, both knowledge
of things and knowledge of truths, rest upon acquaintance as its foundation. It is therefore important
to consider what kinds of things there are which we have acquaintance" (Russell, 57). You know
stuff through acquaintance by directly experiencing it and you know stuff through description from
hearing what other have told you from there direct experiences. William James on the other hand
would have had different views than Russell in some aspects. James believed that you needed more
than just an idea to make something true, it needed power. James believes that truth is dynamic
rather than static. James feels truth 'happens' when everything holds together, when what you
believe actually fits in with other things you also believe. While at the same time, James believed
something is false when it doesn't fit in with the systems of your beliefs. James said, "The most
violent revolutions in an individual's beliefs leave most of his old order standing. Time and space,
cause and effect, nature and history, and one's biography remain untouched. New truth is always a
go–between, a smoother–over of transitions. It marries old opinion to new fact so as ever to show a
minimum of jolt, a maximum of continuity" (James, 124). Truth is a web where each belief
contributes to support our other beliefs. James would have reacted

Difference Between Truth And Story Truth
"I want you to feel what I felt. I want you to know why story–truth is truer sometimes than
happening–truth" (O'Brien 171). When telling a story, people often exaggerate details, characters
and other events in the story in order to make it more interesting. Why do people do this? Do they
do it because they feel that the story lacked something and needs to be expanded upon, or is it
something else. This way of telling a story is especially prevalent in Tim O'Brien's book The Things
They Carried, which is a collection of stories about the Vietnam war. Throughout the text, O'Brien
uses repetition, oxymorons, and imagery to illustrate the differences between story–truth and
happening truth to the reader. In order for something to be ingrained ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When O'Brien defines story–truth and happening–truth, he often uses oxymorons to establish the
point that these two ideas are extremely complicated. When O'Brien uses an oxymoron, it's usually
when he wants to make a point on the fact that both of these truths aren't exactly true, like when he
says, "In many cases a true war story cannot be believed. If you believe it, be skeptical. It's a
question of credibility. Often the crazy stuff is true and the normal stuff isn't, because the normal
stuff is necessary to make you believe the truly incredible craziness." (68). What he is essentially
saying is, when creating a story, adding believable parts is neccessary for a story to make sense.
Another time he explains that regardless of how good a story seems to be, there has to be parts made
up because a 'true war story' is never good,"A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor
encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, ... If a story seems moral, do not
believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, ... then you have been made the victim of a
very old and terrible lie" (O'Brien 65). This leads back in to the differences between happening and
story–truth, by explaing the way that story truth is used to ground a story in reality for a reader,
rather than simply expanding on details like in happening–truths. O'Briens use of Oxymorons,
although rarely used, show that he is fully aware of the contradictory

Socrates Truth
In Plato's Republic, Socrates engages the concept of truth. Everyone has their own interpretation of
truth, but Socrates analyses which one is accurate. In order for a city to run smoothly and fair, truth
mus be a virtue that everyone needs in order to live in harmony. The only group allowed to lie for
the security of the city are the guardians. Truth is a concept that has to be established because
without it, there will be no justice. "Justice is the necessary prerequisite to have the good. What is
good is also just, and without justice we can not have the good" (Masroori). While dialoguing with
Cephalus about age and desires, at one point Cephalus tells Socrates that desires go away with age
and the elderly start to live harmoniously, Socrates questions him about other elders not believing
the same thing. They both come to the conclusion that truth is a concept that varies amongst
everyone and no one truth will be universal in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Neo is taken by Morpheus's followers, Trinity and Switch, to a secret building to meet Morpheus in
person and discuss the matrix and the "dreams" he has been experiencing. Once Morpheus explains
to Neo that the world he is living in is not really what he thinks it is, Neo starts to believe that
Morpheus might be crazy, but on the other hand, he is not sure. "You have the look of a man who
accepts what he sees because he's expecting to wake up. You know something. What you know, you
cant explain. But you feel it. You felt it your entire life: that theres something wrong with the world.
The matrix is everywhere. It is all around us, it is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to
blind you from the truth" The Matrix (Andy Wachowski and Lana Wachowski). Neo, now confused
about what truly is happening, is offered two options; either to live the life he was living in and
continue with his doubts or open his mind to the truths of the world around

Essay on The Truth
The "Truth"
Every thought that ever entered our mind is a consequence of our struggle to reach out for the truth.
Since our early age we have been thought to believe that there has to be right and wrong and we
continuously searched for the "correct" answer. Unlike school's multiple choice tests, life thought us
that there is more than one correct answer. At one point we learned that some questions don't have
answers at all, or they are way too complex for our mind to understand them. Yet we never stopped
struggling to reach out for the ultimate truth. In order for us to become closer to it, we classified the
"truth" in many ways. Some of the ways to approach the "truth" are through math and science, art or
our personal beliefs ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All of our beliefs and thoughts are about the outside world and we would not have any of them if we
didn't "use our eyes". Our "eyes" help us create and change what we believe is true.
If we try to define the "truth" from a different perspective as an ultimate objectivity, or universality
that holds for everyone, then our opinions or what we have "inside" could never be the "truth" since
one person's thoughts will never be the same as anyone else's. The problem rises when people define
the "truth" as an objective and that they see, know or understand it while everybody else is wrong.
This is a great fallacy because what is objective to one person, for the uniqness of individuals,
becomes subjective for a group of people. Therefore, no one can be either right or wrong. However,
if one chooses to see the truth as an ultimate objectivity, then he must understand that his beliefs on
what is "truth" are as wrong or as far from the "universal truth" as anyone else's.
There are two ways of knowing: searching for the "truth" within yourself, and searching the outside
world to gain factual sort of information. They art both equally important. The only difference is that
those two ways should be used to solve different problems. When it comes down to personal issues
a person should refer to him/herself for the "truth" because that is the only place where it lays.

Truth Essay
According to Dante, truth and dishonesty are viewed as the most sinful act to be done in the mid–
evil period. In Dante's eyes, liars are sent to hell and truth holds a high standard to life, without truth
one must face the consequence of lying. In today's society, truth is still important. Without truth
there is no honesty and without honesty you cannot expect to maintain relationships. People may
befriend you because of your lies, but you are not automatically assumed as a sinner. Whereas in the
mid–evil period, if you were even thought of as not telling the truth you were automatically believed
by Dante as a sinner who must suffer in hell. To Dante, truth is not about you but about the impact
you have on society. Without ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dante believes that people differ from animals due to the human gift of love and reason we receive
from God. However, if humankind abuses this gift, the ultimate sin is expected. Although, hell is a
consequence of liars it does not require a popularity vote. Even though you may be thought of as a
good or nice person, hell does not depend on your personality but the effect you have on society. For
example, Ulysses is viewed as a hero in whom he persuades Achilles to join the Greek forces,
whereas instead his deceitfulness ended Achilles in a prophesied death and Diomedes to mourn.
Dante describes Ulysses act as follows:
The horse that made the doorway through which went forth
The Romans' noble seed. Within their fire
Now they lament the guile that even in death
Makes Deidamia morn Achilles, and there
They pay the price for the Palladium." (Dante 219)
A liar is not the only name for a person that provides another with misinformation, liars can also be
known as seducers, whom deceive and take one for advantage for their own selfish reasons. For
example, Jason, the leader of the Argonauts seduced and abandons Hypsipyle for the quest of the
golden fleece. Later he also abandon's his wife whom won him the golden fleece. Jason tricks these
women into thinking he loved them, whereas his only pursuit was meant for his own

Truth And Truth In Dawn By Elie Wiesel
"History is written by the victors." – Winston Churchill. The depth of this statement is almost like an
abyss, unending and unknown. It holds plethoras of secrets and has no rival to match its ability. No
other single entity within this world has the ability to change and morph truth. What is written by
the victors is the truth told, and in most cases, a stretched truth can become actual fact. But, while
the victors may be able to write the world's past, they will never be able to write individual truth and
perspective. The most complex stories the world will ever know lie are seen through each pair of
eyes. Each human has their own story, perspective, and truth that only they will be able know. Each
unique individual has the ability to write their own past and personal set of beliefs. And most
importantly, each person chooses what they fight for. All of this comes together to create the
complexity hidden within the book Dawn by Elie Wiesel. His main character, Elijah, is apart of a
revolutionary force in Palestine fighting for the freedom of his people. To him and his comrades,
they are the patriots, the freedom fighters, the light to their people, but to the British, their captors,
they are a disease in the world, blight to the crops, and most importantly terrorists. While these two
perspectives are clashing on the battlefield fighting for the right to the land of Palestine they are also
fighting to write history. Even more than on the battlefield, the

Infinite Truth

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tammy Lacy

More from Tammy Lacy (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Infinite Truth