Barack Obam A Black Man From Kenya And A White Woman From...

Barack Obam A Black Man From Kenya And A White Woman From...
Barack Obama was born in Hawaii to a "black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas"
in 1961. (Austin 460) Obama moved quite a bit in his early years. He lived in Hawaii, Washington,
and Jakarta, Indonesia. He had a strong relationship with his grandparents and mother who provided
stability for him to feel comfortable to adapt to the new environments. His father was not present for
most of his life. Barack was smart and a good student. Barack attended some of the most prestigious
universities in the country. He attended Occidental College, Columbia College, Harvard University,
and later became a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago. During this time, his
passion grew for civil and political service. Barack Obama wanted to make a difference in the
world. He was very involved with inner city social causes. He gained enough credibility and support
to be elected as a Illinois State Senator in 1997 and then a U.S Senator in 2004. In 2008, Obama ran
for the Democratic Party presidential election. "The most serious threat to Obama's campaign for the
Democratic nomination came in 2008, when videos surfaced of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama's
longtime pastor at the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, making inflammatory statements
about the U.S. government and race relations in America" (Austin 460). Reverend Jeremiah Brown
is considered "family" to Obama. "He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized
my children" (Austin
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Native Americans During The World Today
In the world today, many are cognizant of the injustices faced by Native Americans as a result of the
westward expansion of white settlers. Nevertheless, one incident in the antiquity of White–Indian
interactions is, in many ways, distinct, and founds one of the nation's shadiest moments: the
aggressive and forced removal of thousands of Cherokee peoples from their ancestral birthplace in
the Southern highlands of Georgia from 1838 to 1839. Known today as "The Trail of Tears,"
following their eviction, the Cherokee were made to march hundreds of miles through harsh terrain
and weather conditions, in order to get to specific reservations crafted for them in the west at that
time. This event, however, was seemingly inevitable, given past interactions between the Natives
and the government. The Cherokee people, from the late eighteenth century to the mid–nineteenth,
faced issues involving their cultural identity and property, both of which would evermore change
their traditions, customs, culture, and lives. Though from first hand documents we see that the
Cherokee were of the more "civilized" tribes that excelled at espousing to Euro–American society,
this was not enough to protect them from the wrath of the American government and settlers.
Despite their great effort to persist in their land, they lost, but not without a fight. In this paper, I
intend to examine the logical and moral arguments made by white institutions, like the Supreme
Court, white settlers like William

Why Was Andrew Jackson A Villain
Andrew Jackson was one of the most peculiar presidents of the United States. Jackson had a
different past then most of the presidents because he was born in poverty and had to work for his
wealth. Other presidents were born into wealth and had every opportunity handed to them. Although
this played a big part on Jackson's presidency this did not play as big of a part as you would think.
He had a military background, serving as a general in the war of 1812, along with experience with
being an attorney, and his own private practice. Sadly, his wife died a year into his presidency
causing him to become what this country knows as one of our worst presidents. The people started
to view Jackson differently after this incident, he was seen as someone ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Jackson found that the native americans were occupying land that he wanted for American citizens,
so he harshly forced them out.. In Document A, Jackson proposed that the Native Americans are
taking over our land and we need to take it back. If you really think about what he is saying, he
wants to take the people out of their homes, drive them away with nothing, and take it for our
country. While he is planning this, the Native people already had an agreement with the US which
gave them rights to hat land by treaty. Jackson is shown as a villain by shoving these people out of
their homelands without caring about how this could affect them, only how it would help him. In
Document B, it describes the Trail of Tears, where Jackson made the Native Americans leave their
homes sometimes at gunpoint and face horrible conditions, like disease, unjust punishment, lack of
resources, starvation, and sometimes even death. They had to travel from the southeast of the
Mississippi to Oklahoma in these conditions. Even though this land was rightfully theirs and
ancestors were the one who created this home Jackson made them leave anyway. George
Washington even though the right way to deal with the Native Americans was to be kind to them
and help them become a part of our

Manifest Destiny And Manifest Destiny
The currently functioning civilization is solely a result of events in history. Each and every major
event in history has a cause and effect. The effect of that event shapes the perception of different
contributors of society. In the mid 1930's the Great Depression was a major event that had a
significant outcome that changed the perception of the economy. It made individuals more aware
and cautious about their finances. Along with making individuals more cautious it also shaped the
United States economically. Less than a century before, a similar occurrence took place in the
United States. Manifest Destiny allowed for the repercussion of the Ghost Dance. Manifest Destiny
constructed how Native Americans now view Americans while also shaping their culture traditions.
The idea of Manifest Destiny and the act of the Indian Removal was used as a guide in the future to
change the way the United States dealt peacefully with situations. These events and the outcomes
lead to the United States having the "American Dream" and allowing everyone freedom and
opportunity. There is a cause and effect relationship between Manifest Destiny and the Ghost Dance
because the Ghost Dance was a response, in the form of a theodicy, that showed the European
Americans the destruction they caused by force removing the Native Americans from the West.
A culture can spread its ideology through peaceful means or force. In the case of Manifest Destiny,
occurring in the mid 19th century, the European

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Barack Obama's Judgment By...
Barack Obama's "Judgement" by Association
An attack on a country's ideals is an attack on everyone's in it. Because personal values are deep–
rooted, political rhetoric often inspires emotion through personal bias to cloud perception.
Habitually discovered, displays of carefully edited facts create negative value correlations to
candidates. When used to portray a presidential candidate in the 2008 election year this clever tactic
is effective in momentarily turning off almost an entire nation to the offending party. An overly
sentimental appeal in the political advertisement "Judgement" manipulates pathos to discredit
Barack Obama's ethos by associating him with his pastor's alarming proclamations.
Obama's ethos fall under attack when a partiality to Reverend Jeremiah Wright's anti–American
appeals is suggested. The advertisement opens with a close up of Obama's face with an angry
expression while the narrative begins by confronting viewers while calling them ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Judgement" demonstrates what Jib Fowles describes in his article "Advertising's Fifteen Basic
Appeals" as the need to aggress. He unveils burdens of life result in rebellious inclinations. Fowles
explains while societally suppressed, concealed emotions are prone to rearing their head in volatile
bursts. This aggressive potential energy is an attractive vulnerability for promoters (22). While
Obama, in expression, and Wright, in flagrant testimony, display aggression, the nature of this
display is intended to invoke a similar and opposite aggression on behalf of patriotism and
traditional values, with the target being the candidate's suitability for the presidency. The dramatic
exaggeration and extension of Wright's declarations to Obama's ideals further demonstrates a scare
tactic that uses fear of prejudice to inspire

Edmund Burke Codebreakers Essay
Kyra Wu
Mrs. Gahagan
English 8 Honors
20 March 2017
Red Embers During World War II, gifted codebreakers in Hut 8, a division in the Government Code
and Cypher School, decrypted the German U–Boat codes, shortening the war by an estimated two
years and saving approximately 14 million lives (Cashill). The decisions that the codebreakers made
were cold, logical, and difficult to make, but the amount of lives they saved was well worth the
effort. Normal people also face tough decisions in their lives, one of them being stepping in or
standing on the sidelines, and they have their own thoughts on the responses necessary to take the
right action. Edmund Burke is no different. Burke, an Irish statesman and author born in 1729, is
well–known for his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, in Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry by Mildred D. Taylor, when Cassie, a 9–year–old
black girl, is in Strawberry with her grandma, she bumps into Lillian Jean, a white girl, and Lillian
Jean's dad orders Cassie to call his daughter "Miz Lillian Jean" (71). When Cassie does, she "[flees]
crying into the back of the wagon" and feels that "no day in all [her] life [has] ever been as cruel as
this one" (71). Cassie is mentally wounded through her traumatizing experience of being insulted
and forced to call a white girl by "Miz," an honorific normally reserved for mature women. During
the encounter, Big Ma responds to Cassie's objections with a cold, "'Say it, child,'" proving evil's
triumph is a consequence of inaction (71). Moreover, according to The New York Times article "At
Japanese Cliffs, a Campaign to Combat Suicide" by Martin Fackler, during a patrol, Yukio Shige
stopped a man named Yutaka Yamaoka from "[committing] suicide... after being laid off." A year
later, Yutaka shared that "feelings of panic and unease just built up," and he "had no one to talk
with," until Mr. Shige spotted him, "spoke with him for two hours," and offered a month of rent–
free stay at an apartment. By simply talking to the man and offering help, Mr. Shige managed to
save Yutaka, demonstrating that simple actions can improve mental health. In the short story,
"Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon, a mentally retarded man, is bullied and
treated unfairly by coworkers. Whenever another employee acts clumsily, slowly, or in a simple–
minded way, the others will say "hey lookit [sic] Frank, or Joe or even Gimpy. He really pulled a
Charlie Gordon that time" (7). Charlie does not understand the situation, but he realizes that "they
always laff [sic]" (7). The manager and other co–workers allow demeaning behavior, mockeries, and
pranks to continue in the bakery, and as Charlie gains

Indian Removal Dbq
Politics, race, and medicine were all important factors during the Indian Removal of 1830, as they
had convinced the people of the United States that removing the Natives from their land was the
right step for the nation. Presidents Jefferson and Jackson main goals were to either force the
Natives to migrate further away or to force them to assimilate to western culture.
Politics has always and will always play a large role in how the United States interacts with other
cultures. Jefferson through the Louisiana Purchase, bought 883,000 square miles from the french;
however, there were still Native American tribes living on the purchased land, so Jefferson decided
to included them in the fur trade, as it was not his goal to obtain the land

Analysis Of Jeremiah 29 : 1-14
One of the most quoted pieces of scripture is found within Jeremiah 29:1–14. The popularity of this
verse has led it to be well known outside of its historical and literary context. It is prudent for those
who want to apply the truths of scripture to their lives to know not only what the truth means to the
present audience but also what it would mean to the biblical audience. Fortunately for the current
reader, the opening of the chapter provides clear historical context for the reader before delving into
the prophetic words from God. Historical Context
Before deciphering the specifics of the chapter, one must familiarize themselves with the book.
There is more known about the prophet Jeremiah than most of the prophets. Jeremiah is the son of
Hilkiah, a priest from the Benjamin tribe (Jer 1:1). Coming from priestly lineage meant that he was
well aware of the laws and rituals that belonged to the Israelite faith. Jeremiah began his ministry
during the thirteenth year of Josiah's reign and lasted through the reign of Zedekiah at the fall of
Jerusalem, meaning that he served the Lord for approximately forty years (Jer. 1:2).
"These are the words of the letter that Jeremiah the prophet sent from Jerusalem to the surviving
elders of the exiles, and to the priests, the prophets, and all the people, whom Nebuchadnezzar had
taken into exile from Jerusalem to Babylon." This opening of the chapter provides the reader with a
plethora of information. Firstly, one can know that

Bible Study Of Jeremiah Chapter 1 Essay
Bible Study of Jeremiah Chapter 1
In our Bible Study today, we will work through the first chapter of the book of Jeremiah. It
introduces the prophet, narrates his calling, presents two oracles and ends with an encouragement
for Jeremiah. We will start by reading the whole chapter.
Jeremiah Chapter 1 is divided into four parts (Fretheim: 2002:45):
– Introduction of the author and historical context (v. 1–3)
– Jeremiah's calling (v. 4–10)
– Two oracles (v.11–16)
– Final encouragement (v.17–19)
We will now go through the different parts of the book and its meaning.
1. Introduction (v.1–3)
The author
These verses introduce the author Jeremiah. He belonged to a priestly family, the son of Hilkiah,
one of the priests at Anathoth. Jeremiah was also a prophet. Longman (2009:21) explains that
prophets were 'people who have had an encounter with God and been commissioned by him for
their task'. It was important for the prophet to describe his identity and calling before presenting his
oracles so that people would believe him. This is why Jeremiah starts the book introducing himself,
and his calling from God that gave him authority as a prophet.
The historical context
The verses 2 and 3 give us a short overview of the time in which this book was written. Jeremiah
began prophesying in Judah in 626 BC, halfway through the reign of Josiah (640–609 BC). Josiah's
father and grandfather did what was evil in the Lords eyes. They were known for their idolatrous
practices (2 Chronicles

Course Integration Paper Jeremiah 29
COURSE INTEGRATION PAPER
JEREMIAH 29:11
____________________
A Paper
Presented to
Dr. Ken Hanna
Dallas Theological Seminary
_____________________
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Course
BE101 Bible Study Methods and Hermeneutics
______________________
By
Pamela Frazier December 2013
Course Integration Assignment: Jeremiah 29:11
I. Five Timeless Universal Principles
II. Theme
III. Outline for Sermon or Lesson
IV. Interpretation in Original Context
V. Application
I. Truth Statements (Universal Principles)
1. God thinks about us.
2. God has a plan and a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chapter 29 is composed mainly of letters that were sent between Jerusalem and Babylon. Jeremiah

received information that false prophets in Babylon were telling the exiles they would return home
soon. Therefore, the exiles made little or no effort, to adjust to their new surroundings. When King
Zedekiah sent an official delegation to Babylon, Jeremiah used the occasion to secretly send a letter,
carried by Elasah and Gemariah, two of Jeremiah's few supporters, to "the rest of the elders of the
exile, the priests, the prophets and all the people" (29: 1–3). Disturbed by their unrealistic attitude,
Jeremiah exhorted them to settle down, build homes, and plant gardens; for he knew they would be
in Babylon many years (25:11).5
The Letter: Jeremiah 29:4–14
The message to the exiles was very practical. First, they should realize that God had sent them into
captivity. "There are no greetings from Jeremiah here, no personal words. Instead the letter begins
with "This is what the Lord says," as Yahweh addresses the entire exilic community and identifies
himself as the one who exiled them from Jerusalem to Babylon."6 That being the case, they should
make the best of their situation. The normal activities of life should be resumed. Specifically he
mentioned building houses, planting gardens, and marrying their children. Jeremiah directed them to
pray for the

Jeremiah Evarts: The Rise And Fall Of William Penn's Essay
From the summer of 1829 forward the ABCFM's position on removal became more forceful, but the
organization still desired discretion among its members. This did not hold true for the most vocal
opponents, Jeremiah Evarts. By the summer of 1829 Evarts put aside his fundraising efforts and
focused solely on the political and public relations aspects of the removal debate. One of his
projects was to write a lengthy series of articles that came to be called the "William Penn" essays.
This was the pseudonym that Evarts used to sign the essays, although his authorship was widely
assumed. They were published in a popular Washington newspaper called the National Intelligencer
in twenty–four installments between August and December 1829. With the publication

Rhetorical Devices In A More Perfect Union By Barack Obama
In the 2008 United States presidential election between Barack Obama vs John McCain, Obama's
pastor mentioned several controversial and offensive remarks. These statements brought negative
publicity for Obama because of his connection towards Reverend Jeremiah Wright, he was Obama's
aforementioned pastor. With his following severely decreasing because of this, Obama had to find a
way to regain his supporters by writing the powerful speech, "A More Perfect Union" in which he
uses a variety of rhetorical devices such as parallelism, a paradox, hyperbole, and allusions to the
past history of the United States. The use of these devices in this speech create a strong argument of
his intentions as president, his views on racism and the issues society ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is a vast difference of cultures in American society and schools and Obama's goals with using
parallelism was to touch the hearts of every race with how the public schooling system is failing
these children. "We want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black
children, and white children, and Asian children, and Hispanic children, and Native American
children." He not only acknowledges the races of these children but how poor the school system is.
The use of parallelism in this helps create a stronger argument because he shows he's not oblivious
to the variety of cultures in America which feeds into the belief that America is home of the free and
accepts anyone regardless of race, gender, and religious beliefs. Not only does he use parallelism, he
also uses a hyperbole by exaggerating the fact that students "futures are being stolen from them"
with poor education. This is a hyperbole because the public schooling system isn't actually stealing
the futures of these children, but he uses this rhetorical strategy to amplify the emotion and
relevance of the issues with the public school system. These rhetorical strategies are effective
because of the reaction he can get from the audience. He reminds society of the issues in every day
American life, and what he'd wish to do to fix these issues. He wishes to share the same common
beliefs and desires of the common man by focusing on the issues the common man faces day to day.
Parallelism and hyperboles are strong strategies to use because of the realization and emotions it
gives the audience. Obama uses these strategies to bring in the audience and build a strong
relationship between him and the audience with this

Rhetorical Analysis Of A More Perfect Union
Senator Barack Obama had many issues throughout his campaign. Obama's speech, "A More Perfect
Union", delivered on March 18, 2008, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, conveyed many issues
concerning racism throughout the United States, but it starts out stating how the founders of this
nation constructed the Declaration of Independence, creating all men equal. Obama then begins to
talk about his pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and his racial remarks against America and Israel,
as it is "divisive at a time when we need unity", referring to the " two wars, a terrorist threat, a
falling economy, a chronic health care crisis" going on at the time. (Obama 2) Obama remarks "I am
the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas," (Obama 1) because there is
much criticism in his campaign due to his race. Obama argues that race is paralyzing our nation, and
that it is still a major issue due to white privilege, and racial inequality. In the end, Obama hopes to
move past the "racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years," (Obama 6) and wishes to improve
health care, jobs, schools, and other social issues for the United States.
There is not one rhetorical strategy used in this speech as ethos, pathos, and logos are all seen.
Obama appeals to emotion very successfully reaching people affected by racial issues. Obama
successfully uses allusion and repetition, along with personal anecdotes to relate with the audience.
Ethos is a rhetorical strategy used to appeal to

The Impact Of The Indian Removal On Americans And Indians
Indian Removal The Indian removal affected both Americans and Indians drastically in many ways.
Good things came out of it, and horrible things also did. The attitudes and policies of the American
government that changed over time, the responses and reactions of the Indians and Americans to
removal, and the effect of removal on the Indians are traced from the American Revolution to the
1830s. At first, the attitudes and polices of the Americans desired to integrate the Indians, but after
the American Revolution, those things started to change for the Indians (particularly those
associated with the tribes who actually did fight against the Patriots) who were perceived as enemies
just like the British were. People like Thomas Jefferson viewed the Indians as "noble savages".
Jefferson felt the only way they could vindicate themselves, was if they chose to live and adapt to
the ways of the white man. Jefferson wanted them to live the agricultural lifestyle the rest of the
country was living. The Indians did not have any interest in this way of life and preferred to
continue on with their own traditions and culture. Events and like the Black Hawk War, the First
Seminole War, the Second Seminole war, confrontations with Tecumseh's Confederation, the Creek
Wars, scalping, massacres at forts like Mims and other events attributed to this change. Greed for
the land and concern for how the Indians would fare in society played a part also. The Indians had
two options; they could

Jeremiah Johnson Essay examples
Jeremiah Johnson
In this movie, one may observe the different attitudes that Americans had towards Indians. The
Indians were those unconquered people to the west and the almighty brave, Mountain Man went
there, "forgetting all the troubles he knew," and away from civilization. The mountain man is going
in search of adventure but as this "adventure" starts he finds that his survival skills are not helping
him since he cant even fish and as he is seen by an Indian, who watches him at his attempt to fish,
he start respecting them. The view that civilization had given him of the west changes and so does
he. Civilization soon becomes just something that exists "down there." The movie starts by showing
the Indians as "bad" when Johnson ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Soon he learns from bear claw that there are different type of Indians some which you should never
even think of fighting and some that had never hurt a white man before. More than to be respectful
the mountain men submit to the Indians out of fear.
Johnson accommodates to the environment and learns to coexist with the Indians.
Jeremiah is "given" a wife forcefully and as much as he does not want it he soon realizes he has
everything he needs to just settle. Like in every good movie, just when you have all it is take away.
The real trouble with the tribes comes when white men intervene and intrude. The Indians expect
that these "Americans" respect their territory and whatever rituals and beliefs they may have but just
as Johnson was unaware of this when he first came so where the white men that came to save the
Christian families. Civilization never would approve or respect many of the things that Jeremiah had
learned to appreciate and even love. The view of all white men was best said by the bald guy when
he referred to the Flathead leader, "He may speak well and read the bible but he is still an injun."
The "Mountain Man" is very romanticized in the movie. The Actor that was chosen for the part for
example was Robert Redford the typical American hero, Blond, handsome, strong and able to
survive in the wild, what else can you ask for? What really does it is the song at the beginning of the
movie, which is a sort of song to a

Rhetorical Analysis Of Senator Barack Obama
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Senator Barack Obama, in his address, "A More Perfect Union" (March
18, 2008), pushes back criticism from politicians and Americans alike, regarding inflammatory
comments made against the country by his former pastor. Obama is calling on his fellow Americans
to consider the role that race has played in dividing the country and in developing a more perfect
union. Through his use of characterization to establish his foundation as a person who has the same
struggles as everyone else and is not just some perfect politician, followed by use of repetition in the
middle of his address, he is establishing his true opinions about his pastor's comment, and a final use
of parallelism towards the end of his address to channel ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He does this because it gets his view before the public eye and it corrects any misunderstanding
about whether he believes what his pastor believes. As he answers the questions, he attempts to end
the controversy, hoping it will not be held against him during the election and people will vote for
him. In his address, he also utilizes parallelism to bring the focus back to the foundation of his
campaign. Obama says, "We can accept a politics that breeds division and conflict and cynicism. We
can tackle race only as a spectacle as we did in the OJ trial . . . That is one option . . . This time we
want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white
children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native–American children. This time we
want to reject cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn . . .."(Obama, 3) Here, Obama is
listing all the things that America could do, but the list of problems would just continue on forever,
and contrasting them with what America could do that would actually help it in the long run. He
uses repetition to bring the attention back to what he would tackle as president. He is taking the
pastor's negative comments and addressing them, but instead of focusing on all the bad, Obama
shifts the focus to the

Jeremiah Project Research Paper
Incident: Jeremiah Project This past summer, for the first time ever, I spent a week away from my
parents. I went on a mission trip called the Jeremiah Project. Jeremiah Project or "JP" is based on
the biblical prophet Jeremiah who was called by God to help people in his town while still a young
teen. His example serves to encourage youth to do good work and help people. Although inspired by
our church youth leaders, I could not help but feel a little afraid to be away from family. I also did
not really know what I was going to be asked to do, how I would get along with the other older kids,
or how I was really going to take care of myself. When I stepped off the bus unto the gravel road, I
knew it was going to be a long week working ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We had a picnic under a nice pavilion our family brought us some food for our picnic. My grand
parents brought My favorite dish Parotta a layered flat bread, and Chicken 65 a spicy chicken. I said
to my grand parents that I felt like I could be in this camp however long god wants me to and
thought about the people who wanted comfort when they are very sick. I really like the way god
gives me and provides for me. The next day we went straight back to work you know when you are
helping someone you are really doing what god wants you to do I really love to put my mind to
things and make a big difference in the world and just building a Fence, sealing a roof, building a
ramp and even building a relationship. I really worked hard because I knew the people that I was
helping will now live without any house problems.
Now looking back I realize that 1 group of people can sit together and change the world I really and
deeply care for people who need help in any way. I started to be a little less self centered and
decided to be a little more caring to others who had less things than I did. My experience at the
camp let me see how some people are living a hard life. I know that school is the only way to learn
to stay out of those sad times. But every time I go to bed It reminds me of the people who needs
someone who is happy with life the way they have

Barack Obama as an Agent of Change Essay
I believe the nation is not in peril per se, but the country is notably stagnant economically,
educationally, and in a war that has been severely mismanaged. I believe a change, a new
circulation, and fresh thinking is in order and I believe Sen. Barack Obama is currently the most
viable agent of change. It seems as though his often repeated platform banner of CHANGE seems to
be exactly what most citizens are yearning for. In pouring through and examining countless research
for this paper, I noticed immediately that Obama has written and published many articles, books,
and journals–in short the man is undoubtedly well–spoken, expressive, and passionate about his job.
Although he is well–versed and a visionary in his own right, he ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He notes that renewal of attention to progress is necessary–that we must end the war "responsibly"
to confront new threats to our nation and/or be aware of new opportunities. He then moves to
particular national goals, which he feels he can and will accomplish–"Our rapidly growing
international AIDS programs have demonstrated that increased foreign assistance can make a real
difference. As part of this new funding, I will capitalize a $2 billion Global Education Fund that will
bring the world together in eliminating the global education deficit, much as the 9/11 Commission
proposed. We cannot hope to shape a world where opportunity outweighs danger unless we ensure
that every child everywhere is taught to build and not to destroy." Notice that Obama closes that
argument by referring back to a general principle. This is one of the great (and unfortunately rare in
politics) things about Obama. He speaks so eloquently, but instead of sounding like a drone that has
been fed speeches to spit out, there is weight to his words; he knows he has a stake in what he
speaks about, and he works hard to get the audience to feel like they have a stake as well. It will
indeed be interesting as to who Pennsylvania feels should attain the Democratic nomination on April
22nd. The key argument, in my opinion, concerning Obama that has surfaced and resurfaced since
his

Trail Of Tears Dbq Documents
The Trail of Tears was a controversial yet pivotal event in American history. The 116–day forced
march that removed Indians from Georgia caused 1 in 4 Cherokee Indians to die of cold or disease.
There were many arguments made about the Trail of Tears, showing the benefits and detriments of
the march. The political and military arguments for the removal of Cherokee Indians from Georgia
were that it would prevent attacks on the U.S., and that it was required by the Treaty of New Echota.
Andrew Jackson stated in a message to congress, "It will incalculably strengthen the southwestern
frontier enough to prevent future invasions"(Document C). Jackson wanted there to be a solid
border in this southern territory of America. This would allow the U.S. to be prepared against
attacks.If Indians still occupied the area, they–or other armies– could approach undetected. Another
political argument for the removal was that it was in obedience with the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Andrew Jackson stated, "It will enable those states to rapidly advance in population, wealth, and
power"(Document C). He believed the removal of Cherokees would open new opportunities to
Americans. They would have more space to manufacture goods or grow crops. This would help
economically because it allows the U.S. to export and sell more. It was also argued that removing
the Cherokees would help them as well as the U.S. John C. Calhoun had said, "...the new country
given to them should be ... a permanent home fore themselves and posterity"(Document A).
Calhoun argued that in the new land the Indians could prosper and improve their lifestyle without
worrying about Americans continuing to impose. Many people believed they would become from
civilized as well. The Indians could improve education, religion, and "...pursue happiness in their
own way"(Document

Perfect Union Speech Analysis
On March 18 20008, Obama gave a speech on how to make a more perfect union. This speech was
to the potential voters in the 2008 election on the comment Reverend Wright made which was
talking about the problems America has and trying to divide the nation at that time instead of
bringing unity with his comments. He talked about race equality, our soldiers, our next generation
and why we need to come together as a proud country. He was honest with what he said because
they are all what we are facing today. He talked in favor of all Americans to save his reputation and
to make the people vote for him. Future President Barack Obama gave a speech to the potential
voters on the comment Reverend Wright made. He wanted to stretch on how we ... Show more
In the United States, we have respect for our soldiers and we do not take them for granted. He first
set this by using hyperbole "and bleed together " (paragraph 46, line 2). He exaggerated here to
convince the people that he loves and respect the veterans, when he says these, people's minds shifts
to our soldiers that died for the country and kept it safe. They also think about their families and
these creates an emotional feeling for Obama and the citizen. He talked about we need to help our
soldiers so they will not feel left behind, volunteering to bring them back home and have a better
life. To elaborate more on this, he said "we want to talk about how to bring them home from war,"
he meant that we shouldn't be thinking about what this candidate did wrong but how we need to
improve and protect it. How we need to come together no matter what your race or gender is so our
soldiers will not have to come to the country and fight another unreasonable war. "Bleed together"
was established to describe our fallen soldiers.It tells us that noo matter the circumstance, we will
still fight,die and win together. In a country there is always a flag that represents what the people
stand for or our territory. Future President Barack Obama added "under the same proud flag"
(paragraph 46, line 2 & 3) to symbolize our country and how proud we are to be in it because even
though we have our

Rapper's American Dream
Written by John Legend and accompanied voice Chance the Rapper, Penthouse Floor describes
ascension of people from lower floors reaching the penthouse or higher floor. This concept evolved
from a single song about romance and the beauty of seeing the skyline from the penthouse, being
further developed along with Chance the Rapper's involvement. John Legend states, "Both Chance
and I come from pretty humble backgrounds but our talent and music have allowed us to get into
rarefied air." John Legend understands how the American Dream has morphed with the addition of
Trump into the office, so he uses this song as a way to inspire others to rise from the cracks and
altogether try to make the American Dream more inclusive for everyone. The music ... Show more
No longer keeping the chains of the past on the present populations, the club which was once
exclusive should be opened up for all to enter and behold. No longer should family members be
separated from each other or only some get the chance to ascend to that higher place. Like Chance
the Rapper mentioned, those lines are never–ending in length and will provide no outcome, since
the control lies in the power of those who already have access to the American Dream. And even
when looking at the present day adaptation of the restrictive American Dream, signs tell history's
evolution hasn't progressed that far in that field since the time of slavery. Langston Hughes' poem
said it best, "It was never America to me". It was only ever America to the ones who took advantage
of the real hard working Americans and placed their own stamp and name on it to take the credit.
For that treatment back then, and the added pressures of modern day society now, it requires those
same mistreated, ill–represented, and suffering people to speak out against what they have
experienced and to together rise up and make America become America for everyone

Rhetorical Analysis Of A More Perfect Union
A More Perfect Union Senator Barack Obama had many issues throughout his campaign. Obama's
speech, "A More Perfect Union", delivered on March 18, 2008, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This
speech conveyed many issues concerning racism throughout the United States, but it starts out
stating how the founders of this nation constructed the Declaration of Independence, creating all
men equal. Obama then begins to talk about his pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and his racial
remarks against America and Israel, as it is "divisive at a time when we need unity", referring to the
" two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis" going on at the time.
(Obama 2) Obama remarks "I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from
Kansas," (Obama 1) because there is much criticism in his campaign due to his race. Obama argues
that race is paralyzing our nation, and that it is still a major issue due to white privilege, and racial
inequality. In the end, Obama hopes to move past the "racial stalemate we've been stuck in for
years," (Obama 6) and wishes to improve health care, jobs, schools, and other social issues in the
United States.
There is not one rhetorical strategy used in this speech as ethos, pathos, and logos are all seen.
Obama appeals to emotion well, reaching people affected by racial issues. Obama successfully uses
allusion and repetition, along with personal anecdotes to relate to the audience. Ethos is a rhetorical
strategy used

Essay about The Audacity of Hope: A Rhetorical Analysis
Hope, by definition means to look forward to something with reasonable desire and confidence.
Hope also means a person or thing in which expectations are centered. When discussing the word
hope, one must consider the core values by which the word works around. You could hope for
financial success, world peace, or simply hope for some good out of your day. In 2006, Barack
Obama wrote the political biography The Audacity of Hope to outline his core political and spiritual
beliefs, as well as his opinions on different aspects of American culture. The Illinois senator divided
the book into nine chapters, each concentrating on both his own and the United States' successes and
failures in local and state politics. While revealing great ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Senator Obama is a Christian whose religious views developed in his adult life. He wrote in The
Audacity of Hope that he "was not raised in a religious household"(241). Obama explained how,
through working with black churches as a community organizer while in his twenties, he came to
understand "the power of the African–American religious tradition to spur social change." With this
in mind, I believe chapters 6 and 7 are perfect examples of ethos in this novel, describing racial
heritage, racial equality, and faith. In chapter 6, Obama attacks the issue of religious faith, mainly
focusing on roots and influence of the Democrats growing uneasiness with the displays of religious
faith. Because this is such a controversial topic, I must say, I was a little skeptical as to how he
would present his arguments, to a group of readers with such a variety of opinions. I was intrigued
when Obama recounted his own journey from atheism to faith, contending that the structure of
religion has invigorated and expanded his moral beliefs. Due to the high degree of religiosity
reported in polls of Americans, he contends that regaining a sense of ease with religion is the only
way that the Democrats will be able to connect with a majority of the public. By using this
cause/consequence approach to how we should handle religion, he makes people understand that we
should only respect each other's

Barack Obama's Story Analysis
Barack Obama's story is a story that has been infused into his genetic foundation, the idea that his
nation is greater than the sum of it. The parts which are many, they are just one. Obama believes that
we can't work out the challenges of our time unless we come together as one and unite to solve them
. We all want a better future for our children and grandchildren and unless we perfect the union by
understanding that we all have many different stories, each one is unique. But one thing that
everyone do have in common is hope, which can't give up on. Obama's belief comes from his dense
faith and generosity of the American people. Barack was born in Hawaii in 1961. His mother and
father come from two completely different places. His father is from Kenya and his mother is from
Kansas. His father being black and his mother white. From this we can assume that he has family
from all different races, which makes him a very diverse person. He is married to a woman who
carries the blood of a slave and a slave owner, whose genes also carried down to their two
daughters. He wants to carry down the diversity to all the people in America because race is a big
issue that the nation cannot afford to be ignored. Obama said that if we do ignore it, we will be
making the same mistake as the Reverend. Which was to break down, discriminate and intensify the
negative to the point that it twists the reality. We, the nation, have not yet worked through the
complexities of race which is a part of the union which we still have to perfect. If we walk away
from these complexities that we have to perfect, we will never be able to unite and solve the
problems. For example, healthcare or education. Reverend Wright and Obama's relationship has
been through a lot. The reverend has helped Obama become part of the Christian faith and he was
the man who spoke to him about the obligations to love another which Obama was really strong
about in his presidency. Reverend was the one who tended to the sick and pick up the poor. He
helped serve his country in the Marines. Wright has studied and lectured at some of the best
universities and seminaries in the country. Who over thirty years led a church who houses the
homeless, ministers the

The Indian Removal Act Of 1830
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a law passed by President Andrew Jackson that provided the
funds for the removal of the Indian tribes found in South. These tribes were the Cherokee,
Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. Slave states, following the lead of Missouri who in the
1820s forced its Indian population to leave, saw the opportunity to expand their industry in the
fielding of cotton by "converting Indian soil into slave soil." That along with the finding of gold and
simply the desire for land in the Southeast was enough reason for them to begin rooting for the
expulsion of the tribes. They believed that because the tribes were "uncivilized" they have no right
to the land and were not using it properly.
Despite the fact that former president Thomas Jefferson believed that civilized tribes could be
integrated into the United States population, this law was still widely accepted among southern
states. It was also completely ignored that the tribes were already acting in a way that would be
considered civilized. The Cherokee had its own government, laws, and a constitution much like the
United States. In response to the law, the Cherokee went to Congress for help to protect their rights,
which the treaties they had with the federal government made certain. There was a case Cherokee
Nation v. Georgia in 1831, but the Chief Justice Marshall made the false claim that Indians were
nomads and had no need for their land. He also said that the Indians were like "wards"

Major Prophets Research Paper on Jeremiah
Major Prophets Research Paper on Jeremiah
The Man Jeremiah and his Mission: The Prophet Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah, was of the priesthood
race, and a native of Anathoth, a village in the tribe of Benjamin, within a few miles of Jerusalem,
which had been appointed for the use of the priests, the descendants of Aaron. He was called to the
prophetic office when very young; probably when he was fourteen years of age, and in the thirteenth
of the reign of Josiah, 629 BC. He continued to prophesy till after the destruction of Jerusalem by
the Chaldeans, and about two years afterwards till he died in Egypt. The name Jeremiah translated
from the Hebrew word yirmeyahu, means Jehovah throws. In addition, throughout the times of
Jeremiah, Jehovah ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jeremiah's Ministry: The ministry of Jeremiah really belonged to the last 18 years of Josiah's reign.
Judah's probation was then going on, her salvation still possible; though each year Judah's guilt
became heavier, her condemnation became more certain. However, to the eye of man, her
punishment seemed more remote than ever. Jehoiakim was the willing vassal of Egypt, the supreme
power. No wonder that, being an irreligious man, he scorned all of Jeremiah's predictions of utter
and early ruin. It is no wonder that he destroyed Jeremiah's scroll, as merely the record of the
outpourings of mere fanaticism. It was his last chance, his last offer of mercy: and as he threw the
torn fragments of the scroll onto the fire, he symbolically threw there his royal house, his doomed
city, the Temple, and all the people of the land. It was in this fourth year of Jehoiakim that Jeremiah
boldly foretold the greatness of Nebuchadnezzar's empire, and the wide limits over which it would
extend. This prophecy Jer. 25 placed his life in danger, so that "the Lord hid" him and Baruch. When
Jeremiah appears again, Nebuchadnezzar was advancing upon Jerusalem to execute the prophecy
contained in. In addition, with the death of Jehoiakim, the first period of Judah's history was brought
to a close. Though Jeremiah remained with Zedekiah, and tried to influence him for good, yet
Jeremiah's mission was over. Jeremiah himself testifies that the people of

Stereotypes In Newspapers
When looking at the history of white Americans encroaching on native land, it is often easy for us to
forget that Native Americans had allies that worked to prevent any further loss of land at the hands
of white Americans. Fortunately, newspaper editorials allow us to recognize those who worked
diligently to raise awareness about and prevent the removal of Native Americans, specifically
Cherokees in this case, from their own territories. Although newspapers give us the ability to
understand varying viewpoints on a historical issue, they've also lacked the ability to give a concise
and unified public opinion and often contained strong biases. While reading newspaper editorials
from the past, we're often left with an incomplete picture, as editorials contain a large amount of
information about one side of an argument and a much ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While many supporters of Removal reasoned that Native Americans were savages who still relied
on hunting, Boudinot argued that the Cherokees had grown out of their "savage" ways and had
transformed into a much more civilized group. Boudinot worked hard in order to ensure supporters
of Removal that traditional cultural practices among Cherokees had stopped, in order to leave
Cherokees to be viewed as more "American" and civilized than before. Jeremiah Evarts argued that
the United States was encountering an issue of the detrimental incursions on both native land and
their customs created by the persisting infringements of white Americans and laws that the removal
of natives threatened to intensify. While Elias Boudinot viewed the Cherokees responsible for
proving their civility in order to avoid removal, Jeremiah Evarts felt that violating international
agreements and subduing more vulnerable communities in order to benefit the United States would
lead to a path of destruction for the entire

Andrew Jackson Speech
Andrew Jackson's Speech to Congress: Indian Removal The chosen document was written by
former president Andrew Jackson on December 6, 1830. Andrew Jackson was a less educated
political figure, he was fairly illiterate but he did make major changes to the united states. The
purpose of this speech was to justify, to the American people and to congress; the removal policy
already established by the Indian Removal Act of May 28, 1830. During this speech, Andrew
Jackson gives his reasoning for why the Indians should be relocated. He states that the Removal Act
will, "separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the
power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude
institutions.." (Jackson) This is an absurd statement, because even though relocating the Indian
tribes and communities did help expand the land of the United States, this act left many of Indians
without any ties to the land they were forced to move to. Just because the Indians wanted to keep
their land and would do anything to defend it, didn't mean that they were a threat to the white
civilizations. Though, of course, these arguments are the exact reason why Jackson gave this speech.
Throughout this document, Jackson keeps giving explanations as to why the Removal act improves
both the Indian and white societies, in his point of view anyway. Jackson does assume that most
people understand the meaning of words like "abode" and "discontented." Of course, this speech
was given over almost 188 years ago, when the intended audience was made up of mainly highly
educated men of political standpoints. So, naturally, this document is easy to believe if the reader
can adopt the mental state of this time period: where mostly men occupied the educated population;
most rights that our societies abuse and take for granted today did not exist; and even be able to
ignore the immoral way that Americans during this time period thought. These early Americans
thought that they could just roll onto a new land, and say claim to have any right to conquer it,
without caring too much for the societies that they destroyed along the way. This speech was
supposed to be defending the

Michelle Obama Comparison Essay
Comparison Essay Michelle Obama's speech was very similar to a book by Kathleen Duble called
Sacrifice.Both topics talk about being brave and how you must believe everything will be alright in
the end. Michelle Obama's speech uses hope to aspire young women, and Sacrifice uses hope to
show how to get through hard tasks. Overall in both these topics they have very similar points that
could be easily comparable. First, Michelle Obama says "It's that feeling of terror and violation that
too many women have felt"{Obama 8}. This is comparable to when the main characters sister
Dorothy stands up for herself, but then gets shoved to the ground by an angry jailor who has no
respect for her(Duble 3). These two instances are comparable because Dorothy felt violation and
terror just like the many women Michelle Obama said. Another comparable topic is when Michelle
Obama says "Maybe we've grown accustomed to swallowing these emotions and staying quiet"
(Obama 9). This is comparable to when the main character Abigail gets her bread taken away for
voicing her opinion and she realizes she must stay quiet and not voice her opinion(Duble 1). I think
these to compare because the girls must swallow there emotions to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I think this is very similar to when Dorothy says " Come, Abby, for we must be braver still" (Duble
1). I compare these two sentences because they both have hit a wall of hardship but realize that
there's no point in doing nothing about, you got to be brave. Next, in Michelle Obama's speech she
states ¨We don't give up, we don't abandon ship"(Obama 15). I think this is very similar to when
Abby is cleaning up there dead aunt, and wants to turn away from the task but there determination
keeps Abby focused(Duble 1). These these 4 topics were all very comparable in the sense of they all
came back to the original topic of

Amy Tan's My Mother Tongue
In "Mother Tongue," Amy Tan describes how her mother's English impacted her views of the world
as she was growing up, which made her experiences more valuable. With Chinese parents growing
up in America, Tan noticed some issues her mother came upon with the English language, such as
how society assumes that language and intelligence are equivalent of one another. Describing her
mother's English, she explains the struggles of others compared to herself as "Some say they
understand none of it, as if she were speaking pure Chinese. But to me, my mother's English is
perfectly clear, perfectly natural. It's my mother tongue...vivid, direct, full of observation and
imagery...that helped the way I saw things, expressed things, made sense of the ... Show more
The particular language(s) people grow up with greatly impact the way they view the world because
it allows for multiple ways of expressing different perspectives and feelings. Experiences
encountered will be defined by the ways people interpret each situation, and language provides a
vital means of shaping the basis of people's thoughts. The relationship between Christa and Mr.
Blum, in which their German culture connects them, as well as the relationship between Tan and her
mother, strengthened by their use of language, can be compared because their culture bounds them
together to provide a connection that enhances their experiences and views of the world. Culture not
only provides significant experiences, but it also bounds one as they develop notions of
responsibilities.
Some people have feelings of responsibility when it comes to the culture they come from. In his
speech, "A More Perfect Union," Barack Obama explains his feelings and thoughts of how he feels
responsible for Reverend Wright because they are connected by their culture and experiences they
shared with one another. They have known each other for more than twenty years because Reverend
Wright introduced Obama to Christianity, however he accused the U.S. government for fostering
racism and creating lies that attacked people of color.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Barack Obama's A More Perfect Union
Barack Obama was born in 1961 in Hawaii. He graduated from a high school in Hawaii then went
on to many different colleges. After college he became a professor for constitutional law at the
University of Chicago. In 2004 he became one of the United States senators. In 2007 he started his
journey to becoming the first african american to become president of the United States. He ran into
trouble with running for president when his old time pastor spoke about race regulation in the
United States. Senator Barack Obama wrote his speech A More Perfect Union in Reading the World,
and he was responding to what Reverend Jeremiah Wright his long–time pastor had said and about
the racism in this country. Obama use pathos, ethos, and logos throughout his entire speech. Wright
had talked about in one of his sermons how the government had created HIV to get rid of all the
colored people. His sermon went viral and people used his sermon against obama in his election for
president. Obama wrote his speech to explain to the people why he disagreed with Wright and the
racial divide in the United States.
"We the people in order to form a more perfect union"(Obama 461).In this quote he is reference
everyone in the United States. "This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color
and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag."
(Obama 469). In this statement he states that every color is united under the same flag which is a

Trail Of Tears Research Paper
Thousands of people walk in huddles through a cruel winter, away from the homes they have always
known, and from land sacred to their ancestors. Slowly, the people die from disease, starvation, and
exposure to the elements as they walk for thousands of miles over a period of several months
towards a land they know absolutely nothing about. All they can do is move forward, even as the
people next to them die, because they are not allowed to go back to the land that was once freely
theirs. This deadly trek is known today as the trail of tears, which was the forced removal of the
southern indigenous people of America by the United States. The people who made this tragic event
take place were the people of the south who felt that they had a right ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The bill was titled "An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of
the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi" (S. 102, 21st Cong.) All
of the horror and shame of what this bill would be known as is disguised by this bland language. In
reality the bill entails something much more heinous and racist than the lifeless title would have a
person believe. This bill, once passed, would allow the government to force out the cherokee people
and make them go on the perilous journey known as the trail of tears. In congress, as the bill was
being discussed, many people sided with the Jackson–like pro–removal racist act but a few within
congress saw the bill as it was: a way to steal land that that does not belong in the name of greedy
expansion, and something that would eventually become one of the most dark moments in United
States history against this oppressed group of people. Congressman Evarts, one of the strongest
advocates for the Indians in congress said that the act "is a measure fraught with extreme danger and
responsibility and destined to bring upon [the United States] the guilt and shame of oppressing the
weak, robbing the poor, and violating

The Indian Removal Act By President Jackson
The idea of western expansion was promoted in order to strengthen the reputation and the entirety of
the infant country. This was appropriated and romanticized through texts and documents, such as
Manifest Destiny by John C. Calhoun and the message promoting the Indian Removal Act by
President Jackson, which uses various appeals and logical fallacies to persuade the audience on the
ideal benefits and optimistic virtues without the consideration of the Native American demographic.
While expanding, the Americans encountered numerous Native Americans that ranged from a
violent interaction to a peaceful treaty of removal in order to satisfy the American's territorial
cupidity. Despite America resorting back to its founding principles to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Similar to African Americans and women in 1800's (and arguably now), these Amerindians were
minorities that arguably possessed no value nor contribution the cultivation of the United States.
Ideas initially encouraged by Christopher Columbus, where he refers to Native Americans as
ignorant savage beasts, has been preserved and acknowledged by the Americans where the belief of
inferiority resonates with their perspective of the Native Americans. Immoral as this notion sounds,
the Americans would then enfranchise to urbanization, industrialization, and acquisition of abundant
resources without pondering on the consequences it has on the Native Americans. In 1830, in order
to proceed in territorial aggrandizement, newly–inaugurated President Jackson scribed a
congressional message promoting the removal of Indians for the vain benefit of the United States. In
the intermediary of his message, he states a rhetorical question: What good man would prefer a
country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic,
studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms embellished with all the improvements which art
can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than 12 million happy people, and filled with all
the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion? (Jackson 1) The inclusion of this rhetorical
question is to exclude the care for Native Americans as they are perceived as "savages", and place
more stress on the significant

The American Dream
Many years ago, the term "American Dream" can be defined as the hope that anyone no matter their
religion, race, ethnicity can be successful, as long as there is hard work and dedication. Many people
across the United States think that if they're rich than they're already successful in life even if they
haven't worked a day in their lives. Does the American Dream still exist? Yes, the American Dream
still exist, because everyone has an equal amount of opportunity and has an equal amount hard work
to achieve it.
The American Dream from the past years isn't the same but it still exists. For example, we the
people of the United States is protected by the declaration of Independence; this document was
created over 200 years ago. The document states "We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all
men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed,–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation
on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
affect their Safety and Happiness" (Jefferson, Paragraph 2). Meaning that everyone has the right to
be happy and do what they

Babylonian Exile Essay
Prophets of Zion and the Babylonian Exile In ancient Jewish culture, prophets were a part of every–
day life. They proclaimed what they understood to be God's word, and lived according to it. In times
of crisis, prophets were even more present, to warn and give consolation to the people. One time
period in which there were many prophets was the Babylonian Exile, where the people of Judah
were taken and deported to live in Babylon. Of the books of the prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah, Isaiah
63:7–64:12 and Jeremiah 29:4–23 will be examined together. The book of Isaiah can essentially be
divided into three groups of authors, the first being an eight century prophet called Isaiah of
Jerusalem. The second is an anonymous prophet who shares ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Also, the following chapters have a citation from Is 11:6–9 and other traditions that supposedly do
not belong to what has been gathered and suggested as the Isaiah of the post–exilic Judean society
(Bergant, 1042).
As stated earlier and quoted from the passage itself, the Jeremian passage was written during the
Babylonian exile and deals with that current situation. It begins with God directly addressing his
exiled people, and goes on to tell them what he plans for them. "But seek the welfare of the city
where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find
your welfare For thus says the Lord: Only when Babylon's seventy years are completed will I visit
you, and I will fulfill to you my promise and bring you back to this place. For surely I know the
plans I have for you, says the Lord, plans for your welfare and not for harm, to give you a future
with hope" (Jer 29:8,10,11).
It is important to note the fact that after his initial acknowledgement of God's "gracious deeds" and
"praiseworthy acts," Isaiah's confidence in God deteriorated and not once throughout the rest of the
passage did he regain any of it. The prayer is a communal lament, but disorganized in such a way
that it adds a feeling of desperation (Mays 889). It could be said that the whole prayer

Persuasive Essay On Indian Removal
Compare and Contrast Essay
The Indian Removal Act took place in 1830 by order of president Andrew Jackson to relocate
Native indians to the west. In his speech called "On Indian Removal", he explains how Indian
Removal is beneficial to both the Indians and White Americans. Another writing about Indian
removal is a personal story about a young boy being relocated with his clan and traveling on what is
known as the Trail Of Tears. Though these two readings discuss the same topic, they use very
different language to get their point across and to describe their view on Indian removal. Between
the two pieces of writing, there are differences in the description of the situation, sentence structure,
and tone. The differences in language between Jackson's "On Indian Removal" and Rutledge's
"Samuel's Memory" show that Indian removal was viewed differently by different groups of people,
and affected them in various ways.
The way that the situation is described in the two readings is very different. In Jackson's "On Indian
Removal", he says, "These remove hundreds and almost thousands of miles at their own expense,
purchase the lands they occupy, and support themselves at their new homes from the moment of
their arrival..... How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace the opportunity of
removing to the West on such conditions!". Here he is saying that Indian Removal is an opportunity
for the Indians to purchase new land and start a new life somewhere else and the

Reverend Wright 's Speech Controversy
In 2003, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, President Barack Obama 's former pastor, gave a sermon that
seemingly condemned America. Snippets of the reverend 's speech sparked controversy in 2008 due
to the fact that President Obama was still running for the democratic nominee for the Presidential
Election. Doubts about Obama began to form due to his association with Wright. Can the country
trust a man who associates with a person that hate the country? As a response to the reverend 's
statement, Obama gave his speech "A More Perfect Union" to address the controversy, strongly
putting Wright 's speech in perspective and settling the controversies about himself. Reverend
Wright 's sermon went viral due to the fact he says, "Goddamn America." In the short clips of his
sermon, Reverend Wright was riling up the members of his church as he talks about the inequalities
African Americans have to face in the country. The statements made in the short clip anger and may
even have sparked some fear in people. How dare Wright to have insulted his own country and
states that it was in the Bible and did Obama share the same views as his minister? How will these
radical views effect Obama 's decision as President if he wins the election? In Obama 's speech, he
ultimately disagrees with Reverend Wright 's statements and explains Wright 's background to give
some context of the sermon and also reassures the country of his qualifications as a nominee for the
Presidential Election. I agree with Obama

Understanding Jeremiah's Prophecy
Compulsory Service and Conditional Calamity
The original prophecy said:
"11 And all this land will be reduced to ruins and will become an object of horror, and these nations
will have to serve the king of Babylon for 70 years."' 12 "'But when 70 years have been fulﬁlled, I
will call to account the king of Babylon and that nation for their error,' declares Jehovah, 'and I will
make the land of the Chaldeans a desolate wasteland for all time." Jer. 2511–12
The Original Prophecy content:
1. Babylon to be used as Gods servant to punish disobedient nations including Jerusalem and Judah
2. Land to be reduced to ruins and a object of horror
3. All these nations including Jerusalem and Judah to serve Babylon 70 years explicitly.
4. Context shows that the serving Babylon for 70 years was compulsory , the calamity and ruin was
conditional the people could have served 70 years without suffering the calamity.
5. After 70 years Babylon call to account and suffers similar devastation
The Context
This is most important in understanding Jeremiah's prophecy, it is in fact the key to how the 70
years is applied.
Jer 26:3 Perhaps they will listen and each one will turn back from his evil way, and I will change my
mind concerning the calamity that I intend to bring on them because of their evil deeds. (Calamity
conditional)
Jer 26:13 now, reform your ways and your actions and obey the voice of Jehovah your God, and
Jehovah will change his mind concerning the

The Pros And Cons Of Racial Discrimination
As an international student, I was given a great opportunity to pursue a wide range of academic
studies and to experience the world diversity that enriches the promotion of a cultural exchange
amongst students from many different parts of the world. Interactions with different races on a
personal level has allowed me to gain a better understanding about them in person, their values, and
the world; however, until I left home and went abroad as an international student, I, too, was one of
few people who had only seen them in person from a long distance or through social media. As
much as the issue of racial discrimination has been extreme and people's ignorance of this issue has
grown in many countries, I had once denied to accept the difference and created bias in my personal
view and the way I perceived different races. People tend to acquire various knowledge through
individual perception formed simply by seeing what is currently lain in front of us, as I did. Barack
Obama, while campaigning for the presidential nomination at the National Constitution Center
Union in Philadelphia in 2008, delivered his speech about controversial issues of race that still exist
in the history of America (Rai, 646).
The speech titled "A More Perfect Union" conveys numerous messages regarding Obama's
concerning beliefs of racism. Barack Obama, himself, despite serving as the 44th President of the
United States, had gone through the long and hurtful journey of difficulties in the presence of racial
discrimination having to face the prejudice against the colored skin and a different social and
cultural background. Being colored, preconceptions about him was inevitable even during his
campaign, but his oratory that openly addressed the race which is the sensitive topic that is rarely
discussed or spoken in public, captured great attention allowing him to successfully build his image
as an intelligent and patriotic candidate. Through the speech, Obama not only responds to the
criticisms of his affiliation with his former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who spoke of
controversial and incendiary statements about the divisive racial challenges in America and the
injustice of the country as a nation by questioning the U.S. government,

Barack Obam A Black Man From Kenya And A White Woman From...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tammi Busch

More from Tammi Busch (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Barack Obam A Black Man From Kenya And A White Woman From...