2009 financieel jaarverslag

HAPIN
PAPUA SUPPORT FOUNDATION
ANNUAL REPORT 2009

Hapin Papua Support Foundation Annual Report 2009
2
COLOPHON
HAPIN Foundation was established on February 23rd, 1972.
The foundation Hulp Aan Papua’s In Nood is registered with the Chamber of Commerce under
no. 41113659. In English texts the name of the foundation is translated into „Papua Support
Foundation‟.
The tax-collector‟s office acknowledges HAPIN as an institution for the general good (in Dutch:
ANBI) under fiscal no. 8040.33.730.
Since July 1 2001, HAPIN is certified with the Central Fundraising Bureau (Dutch: CBF) under
registration no. 123-01.
Photo front-page: Anoek de Groot (www.anoekphotography.com)
Hapin’s board consists of the following members:
Chairwoman: Ms. W.W.F. (Wytske) Inggamer
Secretary: Ms. M.M.(Maaike) te Rietmole
Treasurer: Mr. R.E. (Rob) van de Lustgraaf
Member: Mr. A.N. (At) Ipenburg
Member: Mr. G. (Geart) Benedictus
Member: Mr. S.D. (David) Itaar
Member: Mr. W.G. (Wim) Westerbaan
Staff Papua Support Foundation
Director & project coordinator: Mr. J.A. (Jeroen) Overweel
Financial officer: Mr. R. (Reinier) de Lang
Project officer scholarships, PNG projects & webmaster: Ms. S. (Sophie) Schreurs
Stichting Hulp aan Papua‟s in Nood (HAPIN)
(Papua Support Foundation)
St. Jacobsstraat 203
3511 BP UTRECHT
Tel: 030-2340012
Fax: 030-2369055
www.hapin.nl

3
MISSION STATEMENT
Mission
Hapin invests in a sustainable future for Papua by rendering support to local initiatives which
attribute to a strengthening of the rights and the welfare of the indigenous peoples of Papua.
Vision
We envision a strengthened position of Hapin as stakeholder in the development of Papua. Hapin
anticipates on new complex developments in Papuan society. We are optimistic about Papuan
talents, skills and their future prospects. We consider the ever continuing democratization as a
window of opportunity for furthering the representation of poor Papuans and thereby improvement
of their general well being.

4
1. INTRODUCTION
You are reading Hapin‟s first annual report in English. Although Hapin is still firmly rooted in Dutch
society, the need is felt to internationalize our presentation. The Netherlands have strong ties with
Indonesia, and in colonial times the area of present day provinces Papua and West Papua were
under extended Dutch rule. But this was the case until 1962. At present, attention to the situation
in Papua is a worldwide matter, and not just limited to the Netherlands. In 2010, Hapin‟s website
will have an Indonesian and English version.
We are pleased to announce the founding of our sister organisation in Papua, Pt Hapin. It was
scheduled for some time in 2009, but realized on February 23rd
2010, exactly 38 years after HAPIN
Foundation was established in The Netherlands. Shifting responsibility and power to (organizations
of) the beneficiaries is a trend, and rightly so. Pt. Hapin is a new initiative in Papua itself from and
for Papuans, but closely linked to Hapin Netherlands and on an equal footing. Pt Hapin will grow,
expand and develop, based on activities that come from within Papuan society, and according to its
needs. It also provides the opportunity to better organize the so called downward accountability.
Papuans will be members of a Papuan organization, exerting direct influence on policies of Hapin
Foundation and Pt. Hapin alike.
The newborn Pt. Hapin is a sign of Hapin‟s vitality, an expression of the continuous need to find
new ways to support the Papuan people.
Wytske Inggamer
Chairperson

5
CONTENTS
COLOPHON......................................................................................................................... 2
MISSION STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 3
1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 4
2. NARRATIVE REPORT......................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Overview of events in Papua in 2009....................................................................... 6
2.2 Hapin’s objectives: from policy to results ................................................................ 8
2.2.1 Small Projects Fund ............................................................................................... 9
2.2.2 Study Grants Programme ......................................................................................17
2.2.3 Projects Papua New Guinea (PNG) ..........................................................................20
2.2.4 Boarding houses...................................................................................................23
2.2.5 Information to the Dutch public..............................................................................24
2.3 Governance.............................................................................................................26
2.3.1 Organizational development ..................................................................................26
2.3.2 Cooperation.........................................................................................................26
2.3.3 Secondary occupations of Hapin staff ......................................................................27
2.3.4 Salary policy........................................................................................................27
2.4 Fundraising Policy, aims and results.......................................................................28
2.4.1 Present situation ..................................................................................................28
2.4.2 Future financing of development projects and Hapin‟s ambitions ................................29
2.5 Future.....................................................................................................................31
3. FINANCIAL REPORT ........................................................................................................32
4. ANNEXES.......................................................................................................................51

6
2. NARRATIVE REPORT
2.1 Overview of events in Papua in 2009
The first major event of the year was an earthquake in the Manokwari region on January 4th
. The
death toll was four, and material damage was considerable.
Earthquakes may happen unexpectedly, this is not the case for the human rights violations in
Papua, which seem to go on unabated. These violations range from police raids on offices and
arrests of journalists to extrajudicial killings.
Arrests of journalists occurred in March in the wake of Nicolaas Jouwe‟s visit to Papua, which will
discussed below. Four Dutch journalists had permission to report on Jouwe‟s visit to Papua. That
was an exception to Jakarta‟s policy, still in force today, not to allow foreign journalists into Papua.
Jouwe was the subject, but when the journalists were present at a pro-independence
demonstration, they were arrested.
Arrests like these are one of many indicators of the nationalist approach of the Indonesian
Government towards Papuan aspirations. This was one of the subjects of a conference called
„Papua Pride‟, organized by Hapin in cooperation with three other organizations. The conference
looked to the future of Papua, but also commemorated the 40 year anniversary of the Act of Free
Choice, a questionable referendum that led to the final incorporation of Papua into the Republic of
Indonesia. One of the honoured guests was Muridan Widjojo, main author of The Papua Road Map,
issued by The Indonesian Academy of Sciences and commissioned by the Indonesian government.
Mr Widjojo also stressed the erroneous Indonesian approach. Papuans associate Indonesia with
police and military violence, land grabbing, discrimination and failed development projects. If this
doesn‟t change, how can Indonesia expect to win the hearts and minds of the Papuan population?
Convincing Papuan leaders in exile to return to Papua is also Indonesian policy, seemingly in
contrast with the general violent approach in Papua. Still, Nicolaas Jouwe, living in The Netherlands
and one of the most prominent Papuan pro-independence leaders of the sixties, accepted the
Indonesian government‟s invitation to travel to Jakarta and Papua. Jouwe set as a pre-condition
that he should see Indonesian president Yudhoyono, which was met.
Jouwe‟s visit caused a lot of discussion among the Papuan community in The Netherlands, whose
members are in general pro-independence. One of the most balanced reactions came from Viktor
Kaisiëpo, son of the other prominent Papuan leader of the sixties, Marcus Kaisiëpo. He agreed that
Papuans should study and work hard to further their own development. Independence is something
to decide upon at a later stage, in a peaceful way. With his ideas, including the promotion of
dialogue, Viktor provided the basics for the Papua Pride conference. At the time of the conference

7
he was already ill. Viktor died on January 31st
, 2010. His demise is a great loss to the Papuan
cause, which he so eloquently defended in international meetings.
In contrast to the balanced use of words by Viktor, violence is rife in Papua. In April, the office of
the Papua Customary Council (Dewan Adat Papua) was raided. In July the first of at least six
shootings occurred near the Freeport mine. The armed Papuan resistance movement, the OPM, is
usually blamed, but the shootings are probably the result of rivalry between police and military. On
December 1, to many Papuans Papuan independence day, 30 flagraisers and protesters were
arrested. Later on in December OPM leader Kelly Kwalik was shot dead in the vicinity of the
Freeport mine. The findings of several reports point more at an execution rather than an arrest.
Just prior to these December events, Amnesty International issued a report on policing in Papua,
describing a pattern of unchecked human rights violations by police forces.
In spite of continued state violence, (local) parliamentary elections and presidential elections,
respectively on April 9 and July 8, ignited enthusiasm among the voters. It shows the pragmatic
approach of the Papuan public. Because why should you bother about national Indonesian
elections, when you don‟t want to belong to that country in the first place? An answer can be that
in local elections, 63% of the candidates were Papuan. Many have been elected for office.
Unfortunately, Hapin suffered directly from the elections. Many activities other than campaigning
came to a standstill. Secondly, the elections had a direct effect on personnel. Our Baliem
representative was elected into local parliament; our (female) candidate representative for Sorong
entered national parliament; and the director of an important counterpart organization in
Manokwari won a seat in Biak local parliament. It‟s a loss for Hapin, but at the same time a sign of
their competence. Hopefully they will use their new power for the benefit of the people.
Finally, with respect to customary land rights, we were alarmed by the announcement of central
government that vast tracts of land in Merauke regency, 1.6 million hectares (38% the size of The
Netherlands), will be given in concession to companies with the aim of large scale food production.
The scheme - obviously- disrespects customary land rights. Considering 4 workers per hectare are
needed to till the land, this implies that 6 million people will be needed. The present population of
Papua is only 2 million.
These plans are in contradiction to genuine efforts by Papuan provincial government to protect the
astonishing biodiversity of the land, combined with pro-poor development policy. In November, the
First International Biodiversity Conference on Sustainable Development in Tanah Papua was held in
Jayapura, just prior to the Climate Conference in Copenhagen. The Jayapura conference
announced plans to implement REDD (Reducing Emission from Degradation and Deforestation)
trials in the land of Papua. Let‟s hope they will succeed.

8
For further reading
Department of State, United States of America: Indonesia: Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices, 2009. Washington D.C., 2010.
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/135992.htm
International Crisis Group: Radicalisation and Dialogue in Papua. Asia Report No. 188.
Jakarta/Brussels, 2010.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/asia/south_east_asia/188_radicalisation_and_dialog
ue_in_papua.pdf
2.2 Hapin’s objectives: from policy to results
In her 40 years existence Hapin went through a number of phases. The Papua Support Foundation
(in Dutch „Stichting Hulp aan Papua‟s in Nood (Hapin)‟, or Aid to Papuans in Need) was founded in
1972 in response to the Indonesian interpretation of the New York Agreement and implementation
of the 'Act of Free Choice', the referendum for self determination in 1969, which resulted in Papua
becoming an integral part of the Republic of Indonesia. The subsequent plight and disadvantaged
position of the Papuans in what was from 1969 the province of Irian Barat, and the scant attention
paid to it by the Dutch and international community motivated many Dutchmen to raise funds to
address this situation.
Initially Hapin provided information and engaged in lobby activities towards the Dutch and
international community. From the start, financial support was given to orphanages and schools in
Papua. Later on Hapin started to supply scholarships to Papuan students. In the course of the
eighties structural financial support for small scale projects in the field of youth and health care,
start-up subsidies for small businesses and informal education became gradually more important.
The administrative and financial span of control resulting from increasing development efforts and
the perceived need for accountability towards donors instigated a modernization of Hapin, both in
the Netherlands and in Papua. A more professional approach meant a separation of implementation
and supervision in general, and an executive organization based on a few „hired hands‟
supplemented with volunteers, again, both in the Netherlands and in Papua. Instrumental to this
whole process was the cooperation with Oxfam-Novib in the Netherlands regarding the Small
Projects Fund (from 2002).
Indicative to the level of accountability of Hapin was the compliance to the rules of the Dutch
Central Bureau for Fundraising (CBF) at a very early stage. In 2001 it received the CBF seal of
approval.

9
The subheadings below indicate Hapin‟s main activities. Each will report on policy choices,
implementation in 2009 and thoughts for future policy adjustments as a result of contextual
changes or evaluation.
2.2.1 Small Projects Fund
Since 2002 Hapin‟s policy focuses on the following objectives:
Poverty alleviation: poverty reduction, empowerment and access to local markets and basic
services
Education and capacity building
Gender: equal rights and opportunities to (men and) women
Political dialogue, reconciliation and cooperation in Papua
Refugee aid: Papuan refugees in Papua New Guinea
Information and education in the Netherlands
Development of organizational professionalism of Hapin and individual skills of
representatives in the Netherland en Papua.
The changing political and socio-economic context since 2000 in Indonesia in general and in Papua
in particular has influenced Hapin‟s policy. The new autonomous status of Papua in accordance to
the Otsus (Otonomi Khusus, i.e. Special Autonomy) has resulted in more focus on the
democratization process and the administrative and financial/fiscal reform. Possibilities of
strengthening Papuan civil society emerged. Potentially this development can exert influence on
government policy. But, in spite of the new opportunities, obstacles remain due to inapt policies,
lack of capacity, under-representation of a middle class within society, and political and community
tensions.
Democratization and reform do, however, give Hapin as NGO enough room to play its part in
bringing government and civil society closer together, in accordance to a revised project policy as
of 2008. In formulating the new policy, we took the opportunity to narrow our focus on
intervention in Papua to the following four areas:
1. Capacity building and informal education
2. Customary land rights protection
3. Small business support
4. Civil society strengthening
Below a short (contextual) explanation is given for each topic on how we came to these policy
themes.

10
Capacity building and informal education
From the analysis of Papuan development Hapin concludes that good education in all its forms is
crucial. In development terms it is called capacity building. Formal education is the responsibility
of government. Therefore we do not finance any form of formal education.
What we aspire to is helping people gain access to education. Hapin runs a scholarship programme
(see 2.2.2) that enables greater access to higher education. We also support initiatives that
improve the functioning of primary education in the interior and take away obstacles to access.
Improving access to education also includes the efforts of civil society organizations who lobby for
increasing budgets for education.
Hapin likes to support initiatives that improve educational practices and methods. There is
consensus about the fact that vocational education should be stimulated. Indonesia modernizes
its school system and didactical methods, but in remote districts many teachers still teach the way
they have been doing for years.
Finally, Hapin supports non formal education directly organized by civil society. This can range
from a special human rights course for candidate lawyers to on the spot agricultural training. The
latter example shows that capacity building constitutes an integral part of projects in other fields.
Land rights
“The main problem in natural resource and environmental management is the lack of
synchronization between the policies of central government with those of the local
administrations. (…) In addition, there is currently no model for natural resources
management that can accommodate all stakeholders, especially local communities that
have traditional rights („hak ulayat‟) but are marginalized and left at the receiving end
of negative environmental impacts.” 1
Apart from constructively and critically monitoring government policies, unfortunately the populace
also has to protect itself against the government. For their livelihood, many Papuans depend on
their direct natural environment. A persistent problem remains that customary (adat) land rights
are not or are hardly recognized by law. The increased activities of plantation companies and
extractive industries make protection of adat land rights more important than ever. Recently, the
Indonesian government announced plans to turn Merauke regency into a huge food crop producing
area of 1.6 million hectares.2
No mention is made of local land rights. For quite some time NGO‟s
engage in participatory community land mapping, but further support and policy development in
this field is needed. For instance, good maps are being made, but the next steps towards
recognition by local government fail.
1
UNDP: A multistakeholder synthesis of the development situation in Papua. 2005. p. 75.
2
Jerome Rivet, AFP feb 20, 2010

11
Small scale economic development
“Waiting at the periphery of development, like spectators, are the subsistence farmers of
Papua – (…) waiting to understand, to join, to contribute, to play their part in Papua‟s
development. They are waiting to turn their energies into cash that will fuel their local
economies…” 3
Related to the protection of the means of production and the wish for more vocational training is
the fact that the people should be able to make more money from the wealth of their natural
environment. Instead of the environment being just the subsistence for livelihood, small steps
could be taken to monetize its wealth. In fact it is all about the development of indigenous
entrepreneurship, including marketing skills. However, using the already existing knowledge and
capacity of the people in economic activities is a pre-condition. Many projects fail because
techniques and methods introduced were totally new to the beneficiaries. Often, in the non-
participatory phase of project design no effort was made of building upon existing economic
potential of the communities.
Income generating is very important for self-determination at the family and community level. It
provides money for schooling and medicine and allows the people more freedom of choice.
Consequently, Hapin supports small scale economic development.
Strengthening civil society
Due to Indonesia‟s democratization process, strengthening civil society has greater relevance.
Hapin supports NGO‟s who work directly at creating awareness amongst civilians about their rights
vis-à-vis government and organize people on a certain issue.
We believe that cultural expressions are part and parcel of increased self-confidence, which is the
basis of civil society. Being a new state with many different peoples within its borders, nationalism
has been very important to Indonesia. In Papua this has led to governmental fear of separatism
and resulted in oppression of Papuan cultural expressions. With Special Autonomy, there is
acknowledgement of Papua‟s own identity. However, because the positive political and societal
developments have come to a standstill, it remains important that Papuan cultural expressions are
being supported. These can be expressions of (modern) art, but also the influence of culture on
project design. Links can be forged with mass media, such as radio and television.
3
UNDP: A multistakeholder synthesis of the development situation in Papua. 2005. p. 39

12
Working method
Within this policy framework Hapin supports Papuan initiatives. Hapin‟s working method has always
been demand driven. Pt. Hapin will further improve downward accountability in this respect. Our
policy indicates what we want and what we can support, but this does not mean that we always
will. We do our utmost to identify good initiatives, but still they have to comply to certain basic
standards of quality.
Pt. Hapin has representatives in Jayapura and Wamena, a partner organisation in Merauke and
good contacts with NGO‟s in Manokwari. It engages in project identification trips.
Hapin uses a project proposal format that is adjusted to the Papuan situation. The forms can be
used, or they can function as checklist for proposals in other formats. Important is that the forms
make the applicants think structurally about the expected results, and what the added value of
their efforts is. When needed, Pt. Hapin tries to help in any way in project design and proposal
writing.
The proposal, of course, has to comply with minimum quality standards and Hapin‟s terms for
support. Hapin uses 5 criteria:
1. The activities have a sustainable character: achieving results that can be furthered
independently.
2. Clear results have to be formulated
3. Gender equality
4. Track record
5. Local initiative
Following approval of the proposal, a contract stating the rights and duties of each contracting
partner will be signed . During implementation, we will keep into contact by mail, phone or field
visits. It is important to us that there exists an atmosphere of partnership: both partners strive to
attain the same goals.
For reporting purposes, a format has been developed that is directly linked to the proposal format.
When a follow-up is desired, the usual project cycle will be followed: the evaluation of the previous
phase is the basis for new project design.
As support is given through a fund reacting to Papuan initiatives, the quality requirements we have
are very important for the evaluation and improvement aspects of the project cycle. The higher the
(organizational) quality, the better the receiving organization is able to evaluate and improve its
activities. That is their responsibility, and not Hapin‟s. Hapin can only stimulate learning within our
partner organizations.

13
As a grant maker, Hapin is responsible for evaluating and improving its own project policy and its
implementation. This is based in an aggregated way on the results of all the individual projects we
are supporting. It is therefore not possible to report on the results of individual projects. We report
on whether we could fulfil our own aims for 2009. Also, more often than not, reports from the
counterpart organizations are received in the next reporting year. These reports tell us, on a
continuous basis (and not annually) whether Hapin is still on the right track regarding its project
policy.
Below is a project support overview divided by policy theme, indicating numbers of beneficiaries
and so on.
2009 grant making results
Hapin‟s new project policy started in 2008. In that year the most innovative projects of relative
high quality came through our partner in Merauke, Alma Mater Foundation. Part of them
strengthened village adat (customary) organizations, which was related to protection of land rights.
In the Jayapura region contact was made with Pt. PPMA, an organization that is involved in land
rights protection for many years. Thus, signs of the shift in project support, among others more
directed to land rights protection, could already be seen in 2008.
The policy shift matured in 2009. Pt. PPMA and similar activities in the Merauke region received
support. We are very happy that we could support of Mnukwar Media Centre. Mnukwar uses film as
a means for lobby, extension and information work. The idea is that the people themselves learn
filming their living conditions, including land rights matters. Mnukwar has a good track record.
They produced widely distributed films on environmental degradation in Papua, with the help of
international EIA and Indonesian Telapak Foundations. Film titles are: The tears of mother Mooi,
Destiny ....my land, Gaharu. Blessing or disaster and Defenders of the tribal boundaries.
The graphics below show that sizeable part of support goes to land rights protection, though
support to capacity building is still the most important.
Allocation funds per category
Landrights
20%
Economic
20%
Civil society
12%
Capacity building
48%

14
Benificiaries per category
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Capacity
building
Landrights Economic Civil society
Category
Number of
persons
Women
Men
Another change announced in the new project policy is our wish to support somewhat bigger
projects by well-established NGO‟s. In 2009 we supported four projects of more than Rp 100
million. Mnukwar is one of them. The biggest project helps young Papuan lawyers pass the bar
exam and provides them with in depth and practical information on human rights litigation work.
The project is implemented by LP3BH, which is headed by the well know Papuan lawyer Yan
Christian Warinussy. This projects fits into the policy theme of strengthening civil society.
All expenses on civil society in Manokwari (green) are from LP3BH and Mnukwar only:
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
Per 1,000
Rupiah
JAY MAN BIK BAL MER Region
Allocation per region per category
Capacity
building
Landrights
Economic
Civil society

15
The last project we would like to highlight is from a community learning centre in Biak. By its high
quality, the application itself is an example of the gap that usually exists between what Papuan
NGO‟s can deliver in paperwork, and what is demanded by grant making institutions. The project
itself is straightforward, but the applicant Teaching@Biak-Utara provided, apart from the narrative
application, a logical framework analysis, a risk management plan and an objective tree. The
explanation for this thorough approach is that Teaching@Biak-Utara is being advised by a
westerner. This kind of self analysis is usually lacking with Papuan applications. Hapin seeks a
reasonable approach to what can be delivered by Papuan NGO‟s and minimum quality
requirements. In the end it is a about bridging the gap between different ways of thinking. We
respect the Papuan way, but without loosing sight of necessary (western style) capacity building.
Teaching@Biak-Utara is the only partner in Biak:
Allocation funds per region
BIAK
8%MERAUKE
25%
JAYAPURA
26% BALIEM
7%
MANOKWARI
34%
Benificiaries per region
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
JAY MAN BIK BAL MER
Region
Number of
persons
Women
Men

16
PROJ NO PROJECT NAME PLACE IMPLEMENTATION AMOUNT IN RP F DIR. BEN. M DIR. BEN.
JAY 0901 Girls education Papua P3W 63.700.000 25 0
JAY 0903 Fuel depot Yongsu Desoyo Kel. Mantowai 21.100.000 7 3
JAY 0906 Village shop Yongsu Separi Ibu Salomina Apaserai 30.000.000 3 3
JAY 0908 Village shop Sona Waiya Jakob Yarisetouw 25.000.000 2 1
JAY 0909 Village shop Kube Tablanusu Kel. Sepontouw 15.000.000 7 3
JAY 0912 Village shop Expo Waena Semeulina Marey 20.000.000 4 3
JAY 0913 Handicraft Dok IX Susana Waromi 20.000.000 10 0
JAY 0917 Fishing platform Tablanusu KUB Separi Boru 52.210.000 18 18
JAY 0918 Cacao production Distr Yapsi Fork-Kisdp 150.000.000 900 900
JAY 0919 Pig raising Tanjung Ria Kel. Usaha Ternak Babi 10.500.000 5 1
JAY 0920 2009 programme Pt PPMA 48.975.000 500 500
MAN 0901 Human Rights lawyers course Manokwari LP3BH Manokwari 298.260.000 12 48
MAN 0902 Lobby film stone digging women Maruni Mnukwar Media Center 17.820.000 20 0
MAN 0903 4 Lobby films Kebar, Ransiki, Masni Mnukwar Media Center 287.959.000 20 40
BIK 0901 Local community learning centre Biak Utara Teaching Biak Utara 136.753.250 165 160
BAL 0901 Pig raising Wesaput Kel. Lenyyo Sili, Wesama 39.000.000 30 15
BAL 0902 Pig raising Pabuma Kel. Naisakdek 34.550.000 20 20
BAL 0903 Pig raising Lunaima Kel. Laninabua 30.755.000 25 20
BAL 0904 Pig raising Lunaima II Kel. Lunaima 24.370.000 15 15
MER 0922 Computer & sports equipment Merauke Kota SMU NEGERI II 50.000.000 33 65
MER 0923 Adat culture documentation Kampung Wamal Almamater+Lembaga Adat Kampung 45.500.000 200 200
MER 0924 Adat culture documentation Kampung Dokip Almamater+Lembaga Adat Kampung 45.500.000 150 150
MER 0925 Adat culture documentation Kampung Yowit Almamater+Lembaga Adat Kampung 44.500.000 250 250
MER 0926 Appropriate agricultural training Merauke Almamater, BPKM, Politehnik-Yasanto 37.500.000 45 40
MER 0927 Demplot Merauke Politehnik Yasanto 50.000.000 120 80
MER 0928 Boxing equipment Okaba Sanggar Tinju Animha Okaba 37.900.000 9 20
MER 0929 Reading bivouacs Kampung Wamal Politehnik Yasanto+local teachers 41.500.000 200 200
MER 0930 Reading bivouacs Kampung Dokip Politehnik Yasanto+local teachers 40.000.000 150 150
MER 0931 Reading bivouacs Kampung Yowit Politehnik Yasanto+local teachers 45.000.000 250 250

17
2.2.2 Study Grants Programme
Good education is of the utmost importance to the development of Papua. To participate fully in
civil society and to give direction to one‟s future and that of Papua in general demands a variety of
capacities and competences. This applies to participation of economic life, the ability to articulate
individual rights and interests, and to exercise public, political and executive functions. The
possibilities to develop the necessary competences are restricted in Papua and, if present, beyond
the reach of the Papuan community. So the potential of the Papuan community is not used or
underused.
Hapin invests in furthering these capacities and competences, which is an important part of its
mission. The Study Grants Programme is one of Hapin‟s main activities supporting this mission.
The programme contributes to the creation of Papuan leadership and professionalism by granting
higher education scholarships to promising students, who otherwise could not afford the study.
Grants are given to Papuans studying in Papua or other parts of Indonesia. Gender balance is
policy, but in practice more female than male students are supported. The studies should
contribute to Papuan society, for example Geology, Forestry, Agricultural Science, Dentistry,
Pharmacy, Computer Science, Physics, Nursing and Medicine.
Achieved Results
- Starting in 1989 in Surabaya 50 students received a grant from Hapin.
- In the period 1989 – 2009 1.597 grants were distributed by Hapin.
- In 2008-2009 131 students graduated.
- The number of distributed study grants in 2008-2009 was 1684
.
Communication science 3
Political Science 5
Exact Science 6
Fine Arts 5
Social Science 5
Natural Science 8
Public Administration 8
Jurisprudence 10
Economic Science 13
Computer Science 14
Education 19
Geology & Mining 17
Health Science 25
Agriculture, Agribusiness, Fishing, Forestry 26
Engineering 4
Economic sector
26%
7%
23%
44% Primary Sector
Secundary Sector
Tertiary Sector
Quaternary Sector
Study grants distributed in 2008-2009 divided in economic sectors.
4
Due to financial constraints and implementation of policy changes, no new applications were honoured.

18
- This academic year (2009-2010) 64 students have graduated up till may 2010.
Graduated students 2009-2010
47%
53%
Woman
Men
Graduated Students 2008-2009
39%
61%
Woman
Men
The division between male and female students graduated in school year 2008-2009 and 2009-
2010.
- In 2009-2010 80 students received a Hapin grant.
Distrubited Grants
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2010-2009 2009-2008 2008-2007 2007-2006
Academic Year
Woman
Men
The number of distributed grants divided over male and female students.
Evaluation
Since 2007 the study grants programme is subject to a new evaluation cycle. Each year its
efficiency and effectiveness is discussed and policy adjustments are made when needed. Below,
you will find a concise outline of policy changes from past to future. In general Hapin is making a
policy shift from quantity to quality.
Implementation
In the past the administration of the programme was done in The Netherlands, assisted by study
coordinators in each university city. These coordinators also distributed the money to the students
in one annual instalment. This method had several disadvantages. The coordinators had to handle

19
relatively large amounts of money. Procedures were in place to prove that amounts were actually
received by the students, which was a relatively complex system.
As of 2008 study grants are directly transferred to the students‟ bank accounts by our deputy
manager and present treasurer of Pt. Hapin. The bank slips prove that each individual student did
receive their grant. Furthermore, in case of problems, direct contact with the student is established
from Jayapura.
Secondly, a start has been made with setting up a Hapin alumni association. In the future both the
alumni association and Pt Hapin will take full responsibility for the implementation of the study
grant programme.
Level of study grants
Since 2008 the grant has been standardized at 3.500.00 Rupiah (about € 260,-5
) annually, and
distributed in four instalments. This grant does not cover all costs, but is considered a contribution
to study costs.
In Indonesia students face a large increase of expenses in the first and last year of their study. In
the first year these comprise entry fees, travel and settling in. Costs for field work and thesis
writing, graduation ceremonies, exams and diploma are typical for the last school year. We
therefore decided the grants to be doubled in these years.
In the past, first year students were excluded from the study grant programme from the standpoint
that first a study track record had to be shown. However, this proved to be disadvantageous to
poorer students, for whom the study grants were intended. Making sure that we support clever and
motivated though poor students through a selection process is one example of the quality
improvement process we have started.
Studies supported
Papua shows the characteristics of a banana republic. Next to the extractive industries and large
plantations active in Papua, Papuan society itself is not very productive in the modern, non
traditional sense of the word. Papuans clearly have a disadvantaged position vis-à-vis the
immigrants, but when they do have the opportunity to study, most of them want to become civil
servants or politicians. Hapin does not want to promote this. Therefore, in the grant selection
process, we look for studies that enable graduates to become self-employed entrepreneurs or
professionals.
Role of coordinators
5
Currency exchange rate on 31 December 2009: 1 Euro = 13.470 Indonesian Rupiah (www.oanda.com)

20
The policy changes as described caused a change in the role of the coordinators. Instead of just
distributing money with the necessary paper work, their role shifts to selecting, monitoring and
motivating students. Many students have problems adjusting themselves to their new university
environment, especially in Java or Sulawesi. Here the coordinators have a critical role in providing
a listening ear to the students.
In order to prepare the coordinator better for their new role, Hapin intends to organize a
coordinators meeting in 2010.
2.2.3 Projects Papua New Guinea (PNG)
Since West Papua became part of Indonesia in 1962, regularly waves of West Papuan refugees
crossed the border with PNG, coinciding with periods of increased oppression by Indonesian
military forces. Unfortunately there is not much solidarity for these refugees within the PNG
government, or among the local population. Therefore, without education, the refugees remain
marginalized in PNG society. Education is a key ingredient for a better future especially for these
refugees.
Kiunga
Since 2008 Hapin finances an educational
project in Kiunga in Papua New Guinea (PNG).
This town is situated just over the border of
Indonesia‟s province Papua. This province
shares a 760 kilometre border with PNG. The
borders were drawn during colonial times and
cuts through the habitat of the indigenous
people. Border crossings are therefore frequent
and are not considered illegal. The repression of
the Papuans in Indonesia however resulted in a
new form of border crossing; Papuan refugees
leaving Papua to seek asylum in neighbouring
country PNG. Since 1984 refugee camps have
been set up along the border with Papua
province (Indonesia).
The educational programme is organized in cooperation with the Roman Catholic Diocese of Daru
Kiunga. The Kiunga Education Project started in 2008 and will end in 2010. Each year an amount of
PNGK 33.780 (€ 9687,-, May 2010) will be transferred to the Diocese. School fees are transferred
directly to schools, which guarantee efficiency and transparency. This is in line with Hapin‟s policy
to make use of local NGO‟s and of trustworthy channels for carrying out the practical side of the
project. The spending will each year be accounted for in a narrative report.

21
In 2008 the Diocese supported 238 children in total. Of which 63 children received a study grant
from Hapin. The scholarships of the remaining students were financed by contributions from the
PNG government and a German NGO, Kindermissionwerk. In 2009 98 children benefited from
Hapin‟s contribution; sixty two males and thirty six females. The reason for this increase in the
number of recipients is due to the fact that the contribution of Kindermissionwerk decreased.
Therefore the amount given to each student was reduced in order to assist the excess number of
refugees. The scholarship is a contribution. This means that parents have to pay ½ or ⅔ of the
school fees themselves.
Of the students who graduated at the end of 2009 four gained selection - and with it government
sponsorship - into tertiary institutes (teaching, nursing and tourism). Several others have
acceptance letters for various Colleges (technical, business and computer) but they don't have the
means to take up these offers. 3 females who did quite well but didn't get an acceptance letter are
upgrading their education. Some students returned to West Papua to complete their schooling
there and several are even studying at University level.
The project needed some time to mature but in 2009 we saw some progress. Student absence
reduced to zero and the importance of education has been picked up by the parents. They aspire to
have all their children receive education as far as they are able to.
Maintaining the gender balance, however, is more difficult. Female students in these remote areas
of PNG face more challenges than the male students, especially when they become pregnant. The
girls drop out of school. In theory they can re-enter but in reality the girls have little or no chance
of re-entering the school system. This is a problem that not only concerns Papuan refugees but
PNG citizens as well. UNHCR is advocating a revision of the guidelines in schools and is negotiating
with UNICEF to work with high schools to encourage them to be more girl friendly in their policies.
Port Moresby
Entrance of the Rainbow Drainage Settlement
The target group of this education project consists of 64 adults and 87 children and all are refugees
from West Papua living in Port Moresby. the capital of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby is known

22
for its very high crime rate. Until two years ago this group lived on the 8-mile settlement, where
land was available for subsistence farming. Some were working on the wharves and others earned
small incomes as day labourers. They had a reasonable and, more importantly, a regular income
and were able to pay for their children's education.
This group has unfortunately been evicted from this land with loss of income as a result. They are
looking for a new place to resettle but they haven't found a place yet where they are allowed to
stay permanently. At this moment their living conditions are unhygienic and uncomfortable. They
live under blue plastic canvas sails with used cardboard boxes as walls.
The main objective of this project is education and empowerment of young people becoming
independent and more self reliant. Education is intertwined with development. Therefore to
improve the chances for this group is to educate their children. Just by sending these children to
school they are ensured of at least two meals a day and kept off the streets. They are now able to
educate themselves and can escape the situation they are in.
In Port Moresby Hapin is cooperating with a local NGO, Caritas PNG and POM Grammar School. All
monitoring and financial distribution in Port Moresby is done by Caritas Papua New Guinea. POM
Grammar School is a private institution. School fees may be high, but the quality of education is far
more better than a public school. Graduating from this school therefore will increase their job
opportunities enormously. POM Grammar school's contribution consists of a reduction in school
fees, a remission in application fees, assisting in food requirements, stationary and bus fares.
Since 2008 two girls graduated. Both entered the workforce. Four girls unfortunately weren‟t able
to finish school because they got married and got pregnant. Some married PNG citizens. This
means that they have a chance to integrate into the local community, not by means of education
but by marriage. Of the boys, two graduated, one dropped out of school and sadly one student
passed away last year.
A total of 39 children were able to go to school in 2009, instead of the original 20 children. The
reason why at the end of the year more students were added to the list, was because of the
uncertainty of the school‟s acceptance of the children. Therefore the project application we had
sent to Mensen met een Missie was adjusted later that year. Hapin offered to help them out with
the extra funding needed for school fees. Hapin expects that these children will integrate into the
local community. Either though work or through marriage. Hapin will, depending on external
funding, support the students again in 2010.
Evaluating PNG projects

23
In August of 2009 Hapin representative, Reinier de Lang, visited both refugee areas. Purpose of the
trip was getting an impression of the needs and necessities and to evaluate the spending of Hapin
funds on education for the refugees.
On the positive side it came to his attention that children and parents are open to education and
see the benefits of having a good education. The parents want what is best for their children and
want to give them a good start for a better future. In developing countries with hardly or no social
services education is a means to a better future. The family ties are very close.
However, on the downside a common misunderstanding exists locally about school fee assistance:
that it is an acquired right that will remain indefinitely. The Bishop in Kiunga and Caritas in Port
Moresby, realizing this, have informed the various communities that school fee assistance will not
continue indefinitely. Both organizations hope that the PNG government will take up responsibility
eventually.
At the start of the Kiunga Education Project the Roman Catholic Diocese worked together with the
East Awin Committee, because the original request came from this committee. During the field visit
it became clear that a direct agreement between Hapin‟s and the Roman Catholic Diocese would
be more efficient and cost-effective. The Kiunga project is running well. However, Hapin can only
continue its activities in PNG when external funding is secured.
In Port Moresby the situation is more complicated, as a visit proved. The ideal solution would be for
this group as a whole to generate their own income and to become self reliant. Non-residency and
changing campsites makes this difficult. This group is hardly able to generate income and
consequently only pay a small part of the school fee for their children. Non-payment of parent
contribution and truancy - rooted in the disparity between camp life and street life - leads to lower
school attendance. Yet, because of their situation education is of utmost importance.
But it is not only due to the difficult situation parents are in, that progress in income generating is
low. The parents only want to return to an independent Papua and don‟t want to carve out a future
in PNG. And the prevailing opinion is that school fee assistance is a acquired right and a Dutch
historical obligation. Consequently a lack of willingness and effort to make a contribution to their
livelihood and their children‟s education, exists. Thereby this project does not meet the Hapin‟s
criteria of sustainability. Furthermore local accountability runs short.
Hapin intends to phase Port Moresby education project out. In 2010 only the children currently
attending POM Grammar can continue their education. No new applicants will be accepted. Children
already receiving Hapin support might get the opportunity to graduate, depending on improved
local accountability and on external funding.
2.2.4 Boarding houses

24
Since its inception in 1972, Hapin has supplied funds to boarding houses of the Pelangi (Rainbow)
Foundation. At present there are three, in Abepura, Wamena and Sorong. For many years Hapin
also supported another boarding house, Lahai Roi in Serui, Yapen Island. 2009 was the last year of
support. The family running the house obtained enough funds from other sources.
Phasing out support to boarding houses fits into Hapin‟s policy changes. Sustainability has become
a prominent aspect in appraising projects. The fact that we have been supporting the Pelangi
boarding schools for 38 years is proof in itself that the pre-condition of financial sustainability has
not been met. The boarding houses are still important as they enable children from the hinterland
to attend school in the city. But dependency on a small foreign NGO is a big risk. Funding and
funding diversity should be organized locally or regionally.
Therefore Hapin has decided to end support in 2012. This has been discussed with the director of
Pelangi Foundation at Hapin‟s office in The Netherlands. The three years time span will enable
Pelangi to find alternative funds. Hapin is also prepared to invest additionally in income generating
projects which profits are solely for the benefit of the boarding houses. The possibilities of pig-
raising have been studied, so far with inconclusive results.
2.2.5 Information to the Dutch public
Hapin finds it important that continued attention is paid to Indonesian Papua in Dutch society.
There are historical ties, still well known to a considerable group of most elderly persons. There are
Papuans living in the Netherlands, and there is a lot of (scientific) knowledge and material
(archives, artefacts) available. Moreover, there are intrinsic reasons why the world, and not just
the Netherlands, should take notice of Papua and New Guinea. It is one of the last areas in the
world with huge tracts of primary topical forest, containing an enormous biodiversity. Furthermore,
the land shows the typical problems associated with an indigenous minority population living
within a larger political entity. Problems that need to be addressed which is Hapin‟s raison d’etre.
Within the capacity constraints regarding personnel, we provide information in Papua to interested
groups as much as possible. Hapin cooperates with a group that organizes the Papua Solidarity
Day, each year on the first Saturday in February. In 2009 a conference in Grou (the Netherlands)
was organized on education in Papua. Hapin‟s board member At Ipenburg gave a lecture on the
history of education in Papua and we were present with an information stand. The conference
attracted considerable attention in province of Friesland, also in the local press.
Our presence at the large multicultural festival Amsterdam Roots Open Air is also a returning
annual event. In previous years we attended reunions of New Guinea veterans, Dutch conscripted
soldiers who were sent to Dutch New Guinea in the fifties and early sixties. For 2009 we decided to
be more pro-active in this, as we may expect a lot of sympathy from the veterans for our work. We
were present at four reunions in various locations in The Netherlands: Amsterdam, Rotterdam,

25
Arnhem and „t Harde. By changing our presentation we learned which approach was the most
successful.
Last but certainly not least, Hapin in
cooperation with PaCE, Pro Papua and Papua
Lobby organized a conference called Papua
Pride on November 28 in Utrecht. An event
during which, 40 years after the Act of Free
Choice, the future of Papua and the Papua
people was given extensive attention. A wide
range of speakers from Papua, Indonesia,
Germany and the Netherlands expressed their
views on the future of the Papuan people, as
seen from a cultural, political and social-
economic perspective.
Among the people that had been invited were among others Pieter Drooglever, Friedrich Tometten,
Fransisca Nuhuyanan, Kees van der Meiracker and Muridan Widjojo.
In his opening speech the late Viktor Kaisiëpo referred to the right of self-determination of the
people of Papua. To him this also meant working hard on solving current problems such as fighting
food shortage, poverty, aids and malaria, pushing back the high mortality rate of newborns and
little children, standing up for equality of gender, the environment and trying to find international
support for economic growth. “We need not give up our principles, but now is the time to focus on
more practical matters”, Viktor argued.
The contrasting views between Jakarta and Papua about the interpretation of history and the
political status of Papua is one of the principal causes of the conflict in Papua, according to Muridan
Widjojo of the Indonesian Science Institute (LIPI). A peaceful dialogue to leave this stalemate
behind is sorely needed. To this end LIPI has published the Papua Road Map in order to give
direction to this process. The latest news is that the former vice-president Jusuf Kalla has been
asked to give his support to this initiative. Kalla played an important role in the Aceh peace
process.
More than 300 visitors found their way to the Jacobi Church where, apart from the speakers, photo
exhibitions, stands and films could be seen and heard. The day was rounded off with food and
music. Fundraising for Papua Pride was successful. The cost of the conference, approximately €
25.000.-., was almost fully externally funded.
Excerpts of the speeches and filmed interviews can be found on our website.

26
2.3 Governance
2.3.1 Organizational development
The costs of personnel decreased. A special part-time PR officer has left and was not replaced. The
financial officer‟s contract was halved from 3 to 1,5 days per week. At present, the staff of three
persons totals 1.9 FTE. Still, the amount of work done increased because the number of volunteers
grew.
The establishment of Pt. Hapin is of course an important organizational development, but will be
discussed more extensively in the 2010 report.
2.3.2 Cooperation
As a learning organization, Hapin finds it important to cooperate with similar organizations and
being a participant of networks. Cooperation and networking provide information, knowledge and
inspiration. However, with regard to our limited capacity, we have to make clear choices. We need
to make sure that cooperation and networking are cost effective and have an added value. This will
be evaluated regularly.
In the Netherlands, Hapin continues its membership of the Indonesia Council, a group of NGO‟s
active in Indonesia. The meetings are organized by the Lobby Bureau for Development Cooperation
(BBO). BBO maintains good contacts with Dutch politics, thus providing the members of the Council
up to date information on Dutch governmental policy and lobby opportunities. Special meetings
provide members in depth information on certain topics. Hapin‟s director organized one on the
Indonesian elections, with Prof Dr Schulte Nordholt as the main contributor. Finally, in the Council
the members exchange information on their respective activities. Hapin‟s membership is free.
In 2008 Hapin became member of an active group of young, small, but professional organizations
that lobbied for extra funding from the Dutch Directorate General for Development Cooperation for
innovative development organizations. This group also organized capacity building courses for its
members. In 2009 activity was low because the leading members of the group were busy applying
for government funding. Since then, however, the new lobby group has been founded on February
25th
, 2010. Hapin played an active part in this. NieuwIS (In Dutch short for „New International
Cooperation‟) is a group of small and medium-sized but professional fundraising and grant making
institutions. NieuwIS is an association and will represent the group for lobby purposes, will
collectively bargain for courses and will engage in exchange of information.
Finally, in 2009 Hapin participated in a survey for a meeting organized by the Netherlands Centre
for Indigenous Peoples (Dutch: NCIV.) The survey explored the possibilities for cooperation among
Dutch indigenous peoples organizations, active worldwide. In the meantime the said meeting has
successfully taken place and Hapin awaits further developments in 2010. Probably cooperation will

27
centre around NCIV itself, as it is a general lobby organization on indigenous rights. With NCIV the
organizations focussed on certain regions can find common ground.
2.3.3 Secondary occupations of Hapin staff
Hapin‟s salaried staff consists of three persons. We highly value the work of our volunteers, without
whom Hapin can hardly function.
All salaried staff work part-time. The director‟s four days contract does not leave time for him to
take up other jobs. However, the director - Jeroen Overweel - is no exception to the rule that all
Hapin staff find it important to fully participate in Dutch society, meaning to engage in voluntary
work. Jeroen does various kinds of voluntary community work. Of relevance to Hapin is his
candidate membership of the board of the Burma Centre Netherlands. Having ties with
organizations of comparable size and with similar goals is beneficial for the exchange of ideas and
experience for the benefit of both organizations. Jeroen is also member of the International
Cooperation working group of a Dutch political party.
For Hapin‟s financial officer, Reinier de Lang, Hapin is the secondary occupation, as his main
employer is the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (In Dutch: SOMO). Here, the
remark above on being personally present in comparable organisations is valid too. Reinier is very
active as a volunteer, also as member of some Foundation boards. An example being Pro Papua, a
lobby organization.
Sophie Schreurs works with Hapin three days a week. Her technical knowledge on websites is also
put to use at her other job with Simbólica Fair Trade, a wholesale, and Simbólica Projecten, a
foundation that offers management courses and financial support to entrepreneurs in Guatemala
and Mexico. She helps others out, paid or unpaid, with website building. One of them being Pro
Papua.
Hapin‟s staff is working, salaried or voluntary, for other often likewise organizations. Community
involvement is characteristic for all Hapin staff. We consider it added value for the organization. Up
till now no conflict of interest, real or theoretical, has occurred.
2.3.4 Salary policy
Hapin uses Oxfam Novib‟s salary scales.

28
2.4 Fundraising Policy, aims and results
A non-profit NGO like Hapin funds its activities in several ways. But every single one of them is
under pressure due to several coinciding developments. To address this challenging situation Hapin
needs to step up its fundraising and align this with the available capacity. Below the general
approach to fundraising will be explained as well as its aims and measures taken. In the financial
report there will be a more detailed account brought down to “pounds and pence”.
2.4.1 Present situation
The present activities of Hapin are funded from the Netherlands. The sources are diverse but
unfortunately under considerable strain. The root of this lies in several causes that are to be
addressed if the developmental activities in Papua are to attain a sustainable character.
In the first two decades of its existence Hapin was very much an organization aimed at
awareness of Papuan distress following the “Act of Free Choice” of 1969. At that time
personal memories of the cession of Netherlands New Guinea to Indonesia were still fresh.
This resulted in a broad base of motivated donors. However, our members and donors are
ageing. Our donor base is therefore inevitably eroding.
Last will donations. In 2009 Hapin has mentioned the possibility of leaving money to a
good cause and the specific tax legislation attached to involved. This has started to gain
effect. Four last will donations were received. This was most welcome. Incidental donations
however are not the answer to long term funding.
A third source of income is generated through co-funding of our programmes. The 2009
fiscal year was the last full instalment of Oxfam Novib co-funding of the Small Projects
Fund.
Funding was received for the Study Grants Programme through a welcome and sizeable
contribution of the ASML Foundation. This co-funding has been very important for achieving
a more sustainable programme less vulnerable to the decline in individual donations.
Incidental project specific fundraising. Last year direct funding was received for raising
conscience awareness in the Netherlands, when Hapin was able to find almost complete
funding of the Papua Pride Conference in November 2010.

29
2.4.2 Future financing of development projects and Hapin‟s ambitions
At the start of 2009 Hapin has explored new fundraising possibilities, which has resulted in an
identification of external funds to be approached for co-funding. Capacity at the Hapin Office in
Utrecht, however, ran short to execute this plan. To address the capacity shortfall for fundraising
Hapin has enlisted three volunteer workers. We expect that this will have positive effects in the
year 2010. We will focus on funds, internet and companies. Although less will be invested in
attracting new individual donators - due to its high cost - we personalize our contacts with our very
loyal existing donators.
Individual Donors. Two tier approach: first, our donor administration and its use leaves
room for improvement. For this reason two volunteers are combing through our database,
actualizing it and facing out the old database. The overall intent is to reduce stamp duties
and to use the new CRM database with all its possibilities of specific donor identified
campaigns instead of random mailing. The Hapin Newsletter (HapiNieuws) is sent to 6500
households/addresses. In 2009 we increased the number of newsletters from 3 to 4, partly
due to the Papua Pride event. In the future this will lead to more successful fundraising on
an individual base. This process of laying the foundation of a fully integrated and
functioning database should be operational before summer 2010. Second, campaigns for
attracting new individual donors. This has been set on hold as of 2009 on cost and capacity
grounds. In 2010 no capacity will be allocated to such an initiative.
We expect more from new media through internet communities. This is another way of
reaching new and partly younger target groups, especially people travelling to Papua.
Campaigns like these are relatively low cost. In the second quarter of 2010 a volunteer
team will start making footage of projects in general and Papuan women‟s football in
particular. This new footage will be put on the internet through Twitter, Facebook and
YouTube. Once published we increase awareness for Papua. We are also thinking of using
footage for TV advertisement. In the meantime we saw a rapid growth in the number of
visits and “hits” on our website. The growth represents a direct result of Hapin‟s effort at
Papua Pride combined with the investments in new media: roughly a 30% increase in visits
and hits on a monthly basis. This higher level was set to be maintained in the new year.

30
General one-off donations. In practice these funds are the results of donations through
individual last wills of Hapin donors. In 2010 Hapin will repeat information dissemination
through its (now) quarterly newsletters (HapiNieuws). Meanwhile the possibilities of this
source of funding were evident through the very sizeable last will donation of more than
€210,000.-.
In 2010 OxfamNovib‟s co funding will end in the course of 2010. Hapin does not expect to
find a one-on-one replacement for Oxfam Novib. This is a result of changing development
aid funding through official channels (through the Department of International
Development Cooperation). But in the meantime however prospects for project co-
financing seem promising with the invitation from Mensen met een Missie and Cordaid to
submit specific projects in 2010.
Hapin has started submitting proposals for co-funding to specific social charities. The
proposal process is not done at random as this has proved to be to little avail. Specific
courses are now identified and proposals submitted to. For this process a volunteer has
joined Hapin, with the secondary task of general support to management. Overall first
experiences point at a general cut back of activities of old established endowment charities
because of shortage of funds. Reason for this appears to be the credit crunch of 2009 that
has resulted in a negative investment return. We envisage this to remain through 2010 and
to improve in 2011. Submissions to social charities for the Student Grants Programme are
set to pick up in the second quarter of 2010.
In 2010 Hapin will address corporate charities, such as ASML in the past. This source of
purpose financing is considered more promising. Especially so as the general international
economic climate seems to recover.
In general further cooperation with companies will be explored with Hapin functioning as a
broker for investment opportunities in Papua. Hapin in its capacity of a resource centre will
offer its knowledge and expertise on Papua. Companies are more inclined to mutual benefit
instead of just giving funds.

31
Direct funding of Pt. Hapin. In March 2010 Hapin‟s local representatives have been
organized into a local NGO based in Jayapura. Hapin Netherlands will submit proposals to
institutional development NGO‟s. The first proposal will be submitted to ICCO in January
2010. In general we expect prospects for national and international co-funding to increase
with the establishment of a local Papua NGO. Hapin NL will facilitate Pt. Hapin in this effort.
2.5 Future
We already mentioned the founding of our Papuan sister organization Pt. Hapin, a very important
indicator of Hapin‟s continued (organizational) development. Our Papuan sister organization
provides obvious advantages. Pt. Hapin is more firmly rooted in Papuan society and the fundraising
possibilities are enlarged. Funding projects and providing scholarships can now be managed where
it should be: in Papua.
With the existence of Pt. Hapin a shift of responsibilities will be taking place, in roles and in
costs/benefits. Hapin Netherlands lends a hand in the fundraising for Pt. Hapin. However this will
raise the question, where the organizational costs for these activities lay. Eventually there will be a
shift of benefits and costs to Pt. Hapin. And as mentioned the actual role of Hapin Netherlands
changes as administration of projects and grants will be transferred.
Hapin does not want to approach this defensively. Change means finding new opportunities and
smarter roads towards a better Papua. This process of redefining Hapin Netherlands is ongoing. We
may consider linking up with companies to work out direct involvement in Papua. We might link up
with international lobby organizations such as the Netherlands Centre for Indigenous Peoples to
internationalise lobby on Papua. We might submit proposals to the EU and be more pro-active in
project-design instead of only reacting to Papuan initiatives. We might copy Papua Pride every year
and turn into a Dutch Knowledge Centre on Papua. Hapin stands at a crossroad and has to make
strategic choices in 2010.

32
3. FINANCIAL REPORT
OVERVIEW of RESULTS 2005 - 2009
Income 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Income from fundraising 528.510 204.380 227.672 312.838 285.045
Other income(subsidies) 205.999 153.949 118.602 256.688 265.440
Total income 734.509 358.329 346.274 569.526 550.485
Expenses 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Advocacy 65.477 41.460 64.179 48.925 69.569
Structural help 352.342 392.639 366.684 422.904 350.155
Total expenses on objectives 417.819 434.099 430.863 471.829 419.724
Costs Fundraising 35.782 39.288 59.777 48.425 34.035
Management & Administration(M&A) 28.342 28.283 35.417 29.229 0
Total expenses 481.943 501.670 526.057 549.483 453.759
Result 252.566 -143.341 -179.783 20.043 96.726
Totals 734.509 358.329 346.274 569.526 550.485
Ratio’s 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
% costs fundraising 6,77% 19,22% 26,26% 15,48% 11,94%
% income assigned to objectives 56,88% 121,15% 124,43% 82,85% 76,25%
costs M&A in % total expenses 5,88% 5,64% 6,73% 5,32% NVT
In this overview we want to give information in the results of the last 5 years

33
FORECASTS 2010 - 2014
Income 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Income from fundraising 205.000 210.000 220.000 215.000 220.000
Other income(subsidies) 155.000 165.000 175.000 185.000 200.000
Total income 360.000 375.000 395.000 400.000 420.000
Expenses 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Advocacy 20.000 25.000 35.000 30.000 30.000
Structural help 290.000 295.000 310.000 320.000 335.000
Total expenses on objectives 310.000 320.000 330.000 340.000 365.000
Costs Fundraising 25.000 30.000 40.000 35.000 30.000
Management & Administration(M&A) 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000
Total expenses 360.000 375.000 395.000 400.000 420.000
Result - - - - -
Totals 360.000 375.000 395.000 400.000 420.000
Ratio’s 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
% costs fundraising 12,20% 14,29% 18,18% 16,28% 13,64%
% income assigned to objectives 86,11% 85,33% 83,54% 85,00% 86,90%
costs M&A in % total expenses 6,94% 6,67% 6,33% 6,25% 5,95%

34
Financial Statements 2009

35
BALANCE SHEET AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2009
ASSETS
Non - current assets
tangible fixed assets(1) 13.662 19.042
13.662 19.042
Current assets
inventories(2) 0 875
receivables and accrued income(3) 272.720 30.459
272.720 31.334
Cash and bank balances(4) 147.606 78.940
TOTAL ASSETS 433.988 129.316
LIABILITIES
Reserves and funds
Reserves
continuity reserve(5) 75.000 50.000
earmarked reserve(6) 10.177 21.087
(other)general reserve(7) 159.035 -28.210
244.212 42.877
Funds
earmarked funds(8) 64.431 13.200
308.643 56.077
Accruels and deferred income(9) 125.345 73.239
TOTAL LIABILITIES 433.988 129.316
€ €
€ €
(after appropriation of result)
2009 2008
2009 2008

36
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 2009
(all amounts in euro)
2008
realization budget difference realization
INCOME
Income from own fundraising(10) 528.510 211.000 317.510 204.380
other contributions(11) 203.080 203.080 0 149.858
other benefits(12) 2.919 6.920 -4.001 4.091
Total income 734.509 421.000 313.509 358.329
realization budget difference realization
EXPENDITURE
Expenses to objectives
Small scale projects in Papua(13) 219.011 200.000 19.011 155.514
Stiper Project 0 0 0 95.353
Education Projects in PNG(14) 29.777 25.000 4.777 40.635
Boarding houses(15) 28.150 25.000 3.150 29.710
Study grants(16) 75.405 65.000 10.405 71.427
Subtotal expenditure in Papua 352.343 315.000 37.343 392.639
Advocacy(17) 65.476 50.000 15.476 41.460
417.819 365.000 52.819 434.099
Fundraising Costs
Costs of own fundraising(18) 35.782 25.000 10.782 39.288
Management & Administration
Costs of Manag. & Administration(19) 28.342 22.500 5.842 28.283
Total expenditure 481.943 412.500 69.443 501.670
Result 252.566 8.500 244.066 -143.341
Appropriation of result(summary)
Addition to/withdrawal from(+/-)
continuity reserve 25.000
earmarked reserve 10.910-
(other)general reserve 187.245
earmarked funds 51.231
252.566
2009

37
DESTINATION Fund M & A Realization Budget Realization
raising 2009 2009 2008
Expenses A B C D E F G
Subsidies and contributions 129.925 20.329 18.702 56.510 16.468 0 0 241.934 205.000 288.257
Publicity and Communications 0 0 0 0 11.219 11.219 0 22.438 20.000 18.475
Personnel Costs Netherlands 42.745 6.679 6.679 13.358 26.715 17.365 20.036 133.577 125.000 138.824
Personnel Costs Papua 28.622 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.622 18.500 18.175
Rental Costs 4.770 745 745 1.491 2.981 1.938 2.236 14.906 13.500 12.154
Office costs 10.948 1.711 1.711 3.421 6.842 4.447 5.132 34.212 25.000 20.405
Depreciation and rent 2.001 313 313 625 1.251 813 938 6.254 5.500 5.380
Total 219.011 29.777 28.150 75.405 65.476 35.782 28.342 481.943 412.500 501.670
Objectives
Distribution of expenditures 2009
The allocation of expenditures is based on the same principle as last year: personnel costs spent on the objectives. The exception is the costs of our
Papua Advisory Board. These costs are allocated to the projects in Papua. In 2009 these costs are € 28.622(2008: € 18.175).
The personnel costs are allocated to the expenditures according to the statement below:
ALLOCATION WORKED HOURS, WITH EXCEPTION OF THE PAPUA COUNCIL
Projects Papua A 32%
Projects Papua New Guinea B 5%
Boarding houses C 5%
Study Grants D 10%
Advocacy E 20%
(own) Fundraising F 13%
Management & Administration G 15%
100%

38
Salaries of Staff
HAPIN uses the salary scales of Oxfam NOVIB for its payment system.
From the start of 2009 HAPIN introduced pension insurance for its staff. Nevertheless we
succeeded in a cutback of total personnel costs. The average amount of staff members for 2009 is
1.9 full time equivalents (fte).
Expenditures on personnel costs in 2009 are € 133.577(2008: € 138.824)
2009 2008
Salaries incl. holiday pay 95.342 112.643
Social insurance 12.531 12.202
107.873 124.845
Other personnel expenditures:
Pension insurance 10.157 -
Health insurance 6.813 7.529
Local travel costs 4.936 4.253
Other personel expenses 3.798 2.197
25.704 13.979
The salary of the managing director Jeroen Overweel in 2009 is € 52.661.

39
€ €
(indirect method)
Donations from private persons and other 528.510
Donations from institutional donors and other 203.080
Expenses on fundraising -35.782
Expenses on information -65.477
Expenses on objectives(structural assistance) -352.342
Expenses management and administration -28.342
Cash flow from objectives 249.647
Interest and other revenues 2.920
Cash flow from operational activitities 252.567
Mutations in receivables and accrued income -242.262
Mutations in accruels and deferred income 52.106
Mutation in supplies 875
189.281-
Investments in tangible fixed assets 0
Depreciation on tangible fixed asset 5.380
Cash flow from investment activities 5.380
Cash flow from financing activities -
Mutation cash and bank balances 68.666
Cash and bank balances on 31 December 2008 78.940
Cash and bank balances on 31 December 2009 147.606
Difference 68.666
CASH FLOW STATEMENT 2009

40
General accounting principles for the preparation of the financial statements
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Title 9, Book 2 of the Dutch Civil
Code. For the preparation and presentation of the financial statements, HAPIN uses the Guidelines
for annual reporting of the Dutch Accounting Standards Board as well, especially Guideline 650
“Fundraising organisations”.
Valuation of assets and liabilities and determination of the result takes place under the historical
cost convention. Unless presented otherwise, the relevant principle for the specific balance sheet
item, assets and liabilities are presented at face (nominal) value. Income and expenses are
accounted for on accrual basis. Expenses are determined taking the mentioned valuation principle
into account. Profit is only included when realized on balance sheet date. Losses originating before
the end of the financial year are taken into account when ascertained before preparation of the
financial statements.
Principles of valuation of assets and liabilities
Non- current assets (tangible fixed assets)
Tangible fixed assets are presented at cost less accumulated depreciation and, if applicable, less
impairments in value. Depreciation is based on the estimated useful life and calculated as a fixed
percentage of cost. Depreciation is provided from the date an asset comes into use.
The following fixed percentages of cost are used for depreciation:
Computers: 20% a year;
Software: 20% a year;
Office equipment: 20% a year.
Inventories
The inventories are valued under the historical cost convention. Inventories are used for the
objective fundraising and advocacy.
Receivables
Receivables are included at face value, less any provision for doubtful accounts. These provisions
are determined by individual assessment of the receivables.
Cash and bank balances
Cash and bank balances are valued at face (nominal) value. All cash and bank balances are
available for expenditure by HAPIN.
Reserves and Funds
Foundation HAPIN is obliged to use reserves and funds in according to the objective(s) where they
are related to.
Liabilities
Debts and financial liabilities are valued at face (nominal) value. Payable projects and study grants
are accounted for in the year of reporting. It is an obligation to partners and students for the next
year.

41
Principles for the determination of the result
Grants/ contributions
Grants are included in the statement of income and expenditure in the year in which the subsidised
expenses are realised.
Foreign currencies
Receivables, debts and liabilities in foreign currencies are converted at the exchange rate at
December 31.
Transactions in foreign currencies are converted at the average monthly exchange rate.
The conversion is based on the interbank – rate tables of Oanda (www.oanda.com).
Result
A positive or negative result is destined to the general reserves, after allocation to earmarked
reserves, earmarked funds and continuity reserves. The allocated reserve for continuity is
restricted to a maximum for covering half a year of salary and organisation costs.

42
Notes to the Balance Sheet as of 31 December 2009
1 2009 2008
balance as of 1 January 2009 19.042 23.222
movements -
investments - 1.200
desinvestments - -
depreciation 5.380 5.380
balance as of 31 December 2009 13.662 19.042
Non - current assets(intangible fixed assets)
There are no investments in 2009.
2 Inventories 2009 2008
balance as of 1 January 2009 875 995
movements - 120
depreciation 875 -
balance as of 31 December 2009 - 875
We decided to debit on the inventories, because they are especially used for advocacy means.
The value of the Asmat art products is very difficult to measure.
3 Receivables and accrued income 31-12-2009 31-12-2008
debtors - 125
bequests - 3.000
interest 1.080 1.574
inheritances 236.886 -
deposit rent St Jacobsstraat 2.500 2.500
deposit TNT POST 440 440
other prepayments 8.650 702
subsidy receivables 20.000 11.986
other receivables 3.164 10.132
272.720 30.459
At the end of 2009 we were very surprised when told about two inheritances receivable in the
beginning of the year 2010. We add them to our reserves and will use them in the future to
strengthen our work on projects in Papua!
Subsidy receivables are related to the second installment of the subsidy for study grants from
ASML Foundation. The total contribution of ASML Foundation for a period of two years is € 40.000.
Other receivables regard not yet paid contributions to the Papua Pride manifestation and the last
part of a loan of PACE.

43
4 Cash and bank balances 31-12-2009 31-12-2008
Rabo R1 4440.72.470 104.789 19.446
Rabo R2 3870.19.901 346 1.571
Rabo R3 3628.888.069 R3 25.000 39.000
Postbank 24300 P1 878 980
Postbank RMR P2 10.000 1.700
Mandiribank 2008187 M1 6.593 16.243
147.606 78.940
The balance of Mandiribank in Indonesian Rupiah is 88.978.859. It is converted at the exchange
rate of 31 December 2009(1 EURO equals 13.497 Indonesian Rupiah; source www.oanda.com).
All bank balances are available for expenditure by HAPIN.

44
Reserves and funds 31-12-2009 31-12-2008
continuity reserve 75.000 50.000
earmarked reserve 10.177 21.087
(other)general reserve 159.035 28.210-
earmarked funds 64.431 13.200
308.643 56.077
Notes to the BALANCE SHEET as of 31 December 2009: LIABILITIES
Reserves
5 Continuity reserve 2009
balance as of 1 January 2009 50.000
addition from general reserve 25.000
balance as of 31 December 2009 75.000
The necessary amount of the continuity reserve equals 50% of the personnel and organization
costs.
(For 2009 the norm would be: € 100.000).
6 Earmarked reserve 2009
education project PNG 15.300
Stiper project 0
Papua Pride -5.881
Papua New Guinea -20.329
7 General reserve(other reserve) 2009
balance as of 1 January 2009 -28.210
withdrawal from earmarked fund 173.940
withdrawal from continuity reserve 0
withdrawal from earmarked reserve 26.210
surplus 252.566
addition to earmarked fund -225.171
addition to earmarked reserve -15.300
addition to continuity reserve -25.000

45
Funds
8 Earmarked funds Oxfam NOVIB 2009
Oxfam Novib contribution 2009 203.080
Oxfam Novib correction 2008 22.091
spendings in 2009
project spendings 129.925
evaluation spendings 1.947
spendings on personnel costs 34.318
other spendings 7.750
9 Accruels and deferred income 31-12-2009 31-12-2008
creditors 6.136 3.634
social securities(payroll tax) 0 9.563
salaries 4.580 291
studygrants 25.260 30.600
projects 83.057 20.000
audit fee 4.639 9.151
other 1.673 -
125.345 73.239
Study grants are obligations to students for the academic year 2009-2010.
Projects are in 2009 approved projects which will be paid in 2010.
Off balance rights and obligations
1. At the end of 2008 the amount of loans to private persons and institutions was € 5.063.
In 2007 the Board of HAPIN decided that no loans are anymore given to private persons and/or
institutions. As it‟s sure at the end of 2009 that the obligations of private persons and/or
institutions will not be realized, we have decided to no longer count this amount. Therefore at the
end of 2009 the amount is € 0.
2. From the beginning of 2007 HAPIN rented a part of the office building St Jacobsstraat 203 –
207. In 2009 the rent is € 10.311.

46
Notes to the State of Income and Expenditure 2009
INCOME
10 Income own fundraising 2009 2008
donations from private persons 171.655 171.415
earmarked donations 35.300 27.500
other donations 16.877 5.465
legacies 301.118 -
other income 3.560 -
Subtotal income own fundraising 528.510 204.380
Income from private donations is almost on the same level as in 2008. The so called earmarked
donations is a subsidy for Study Grants from ASML Foundation(€ 20.000) and a subsidy from CMC
– Mensen met een Missie as a contribution for our Education Project for Refugees in Port Moresby,
Papua New Guinea(15.300).
In November 2009 HAPIN organized the manifestation Papua Pride. Fundraising for Papua Pride
was very successful. The total amount of € 16.877 consists of:
Contribution PCN Kerk in Actie 7.500
Contribution CMC 5.000
Contribution Amnesty International 1.000
Contribution PACE 250
Contribution Pro Papua 300
Contribution attendants/visitors 2.827
TOTAL 16.877
We were very surprised by the high amount of inheritances from late private donors. In 2009 we
received € 64.231. And at the end of 2009 we were assured about another inheritance of €
211.887. One inheritance consists of an amount of more than € 50.000, of which we received 50%
in 2009 and will receive in 2010 another 50%.
11 Other contributions 2009 2008
Oxfam Novib 203.080 149.858
Subtotal income other contributions 203.080 148.858
12 Other benefits 2009 2008
Other benefits 1.353 2.031
interest 1.566 2.060
Subtotal income from other benefits 2.919 4.091
Contribution of Oxfam Novib is the second installment for the period 2008 – 2010.
In 2008 Oxfam Novib agreed with subsidizing HAPIN for three years with a total amount of €
409.311.

47
In the annex 1 we added a financial report on the expenditure for the year 2009.
Other benefits consist of interest revenues and contributions in relation to our presentation on
reunions of New Guinea Veterans.
Notes to the State of Income and Expenditure 2009
EXPENDITURES
In this section the expenditures on HAPINS main objectives are specified:
SMALL SCALE PROJECTS IN PAPUA
13 Small Scale Projects in Papua 2009 2008
contributions 129.925 98.451
personnel costs 71.367 48.716
rental costs 4.770 2.674
office expenditure 10.948 4.489
depreciation and rent 2.001 1.184
219.011 155.514
STIPER PROJECT IN PAPUA
Stiper Project 2009 2008
contributions - 81.212
personnel costs - 11.106
rental costs - 972
office expenditure - 1.632
depreciation and rent - 430
- 95.353
EDUCATION PROJECTS REFUGEES IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA
14 Education Projects in PNG 2009 2008
rental costs 745 608
depreciation and rent 313 269
29.777 40.635

48
BOARDING HOMES (PELANGI)
15 Boarding houses 2009 2008
rental costs 745 729
28.150 29.710
STUDY GRANTS
16 Study Grants 2009 2008
75.405 71.427
ADVOCACY
The objective advocacy (Dutch: voorlichting en bewustmaking) is related to the ways HAPIN wants
to give notice to past, present and future of Papua and the Papuan people. It has a hybrid
character – so called mixed activity. For example our Newsletter HapiNieuws has to do with
advocacy and with fundraising. Therefore you will find the expenses on the newsletter in the cost
group advocacy and in the cost group fundraising.
17 Advocacy 2009 2008
publicity and communications 11.219 9.237
depreciation and rent 1.251 915
65.476 41.460

49
OWN FUNDRAISING
18 Own Fundraising 2009 2008
publicity and communications 11.219 9.238
35.782 39.288
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
The cost group Management and administration consists of cost for control and administration.
The amount is almost the same as in 2008. Relatively there is a slight rising. As a part of total
expenditures it rises from 5,64% in 2008 to 5,88% in 2009. This is still under our norm of 6%.
19 Management and Administration 2009 2008
28.342 28.283
Explanation of differences between realization and budget 2009
The positive result in 2009 is much higher than budgeted. The budgeted result was € 8.500. The
positive result is € 252.566. The main cause of the difference is the unforeseen donations from
inheritances:
€ 236.887(Total: € 301.118 of which was received in 2009: € 64.231). Besides we had good
results in fundraising for the manifestation Papua Pride(see annex 2) and for the support of Papua
refugee children in Port Moresby(see annex 3).
The rise in foreseen expenditures during 2009(Advocacy: Papua Pride and Education Projects PNG)
was covered by extra fundraising.
Personnel costs in the Netherlands increased because of the implementation of the long desired
pension plan for the staff. Personnel costs in West-Papua increased in relation to the establishment
of PT HAPIN Papua.
Forecast 2010
Because of a decline in income of our landlord PACE the rent paid by HAPIN will rise slightly in
2010.
We expect no further rising in the fixed annual costs for the coming years.
Depending on the development of PT HAPIN Papua more activities will be shifted to Papua. The
consequences of this shift will become clear in the next two years (2010-2011).

50
KEY FIGURES 2009
RATIOS 2009 2008
Income Own fundraising A 528.510 204.380
Total Income B 734.509 358.328
Total Expenditure C 481.943 501.669
Expenses Own fundraising D 35.782 39.287
Management & Administration E 28.342 28.282
Objectives F 417.819 434.100
Ratio's D/A 6,77% 19,22%
E/C 5,88% 5,64%
F/B 56,88% 121,15%
Objectives Projects Papua 219.010 155.514
Project STIPER 0 95.353
Projects Papua New Guinea 29.777 40.635
Project Boarding houses 28.150 29.711
Project Study Grants 75.405 71.427
Advocacy 65.477 41.460
417.819 434.100
Explanation
D/A Costs of own fundraising in relation to income from own fundraising
E/C Costs of management & administration in relation to total expenditure
F/B Expenditure on objectives in realtion to total income
This statement has three ratios, two are advised by Central Buro Fundraising( Centraal Bureau
Fondsenwerving - CBF), one is advised by Association of Fundraising Institutions(Vereniging
Fondsenwervende Instellingen - VFI).
The ratio “costs of own fundraising is an important one, because according to CBF the maximum is
25%. Thanks to the enormous amount of inheritances HAPIN is far beyond this norm. But even
when we don‟t count for the inheritances, HAPIN is still under the norm (16, 62%).
OTHER INFORMATION
In 2009 HAPIN employed three staff members. All of them work part-time. We budgeted
the average amount of staff members for 2009 as 2.0 full time equivalents (fte‟s). The
realization was just below this goal: 1.9 fte. The forecast for 2010 is the same as the
realization in 2009: 1.9 fte.
Board members are not salaried.
No loans, guarantees etc are given to board members and/or staff members.

51
4. ANNEXES
Annex 1: FINANCIAL REPORT 2009 OXFAM NOVIB
ACTIVITY I : PROJECTS BUDGET RESULT DIFFERENCE
Items € € €
Small scale Projects 162.000 129.925 32.075
Correction from 2008 22.091
Balance as of 31 December 2008 13.200
Advisory Board 27.437 26.675 762
Costs of evaluation and monitoring - -
Personnel costs programme manager 7.643 7.643 0
SUBTOTAL ACTIVITY I 197.080 164.243 32.837
ACTIVITY II : FUNDRAISING BUDGET RESULT DIFFERENCE
Items
Newsletter 3.000 3.000 -
SUBTOTAL ACTIVITY II 3.000 3.000 -
Auditing costs 3.000 3.000
TOTAL 203.080 170.243 32.837
BALANCE AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2008 13.200
CORRECTION 2008 IN 2009 22.091
DIFFERENCE AT 31 DECEMBER 2009 32.837
68.128
OTHER EXPENDITURE(EARMARKED)
SEMINAR 1.750-
MONITORING AND EVALUATION 1.947-
BALANCE AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2009 64.431

52
Annex 2: FINANCIAL REPORT ON PAPUA PRIDE 2009
INCOME €
Contribution PCN Kerk in Actie 7.500
Contribution CMC 5.000
Contribution Amnesty International 1.000
Conbtribution PACE 250
Contribution Pro Papua 300
Contribution attendants/visitors 2.827
Contribution HAPIN 6.364
TOTAL 23.241
EXPENDITURE
Office expenditure 1.969
Organisation costs 7.680
Travel costs 4.360
Hotel costs and per diem international guests 2.884
Catering 2.603
Rental of church 2.678
Contributions musicians and chair 1.067
TOTAL 23.241
FINANCIAL REPORT PAPUA PRIDE 28 - 11 - 2009
Annex 3: FINANCIAL REPORT ON SUPPORT CMC (MENSEN MET EEN MISSIE)
INCOME €
Contribution Mensen met een Missie 15.300
Contribution Hapin 2.757
Contribution Caritas 66
TOTAL 18.123
EXPENDITURE
Schoolfees 2009 17.073
Monitoring & Evaluation 1.050
TOTAL 18.123

To: Management and Board of HAPIN Papua Support Foundation
AUDITOR’S REPORT
Report on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements 2009 on the pages 34 through 50 of this annual report
of HAPIN Papua Support Foundation , Utrecht which comprise the balance sheet as at December 31, 2009 the
profit and loss account for the year then ended and the notes.
Management’s responsibility
Management and Board are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
and for the preparation of the management board report, both in accordance with Richtlijn voor de
Jaarsverslaggeving 650 voor Fondsenwervende Instellingen. This responsibility includes: designing,
implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying
appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our
audit in accordance with Dutch law. This law requires that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor‟s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those
risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity‟s preparation and fair
presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity‟s internal
control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of HAPIN Papua
Support Foundation as at December 31, 2009, and of its result for the year then ended in accordance with
Richtlijn voor de Jaarsverslaggeving 650 voor Fondsenwervende Instellingen.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
Pursuant to the legal requirement under 2:393 sub 5 part f of the Netherlands Civil Code, we report, to the
extent of our competence, that the management board report is consistent with the financial statements as
required by 2:391 sub 4 of the Netherlands Civil Code.
Tiel, June 29, 2010
FSV Accountants + Adviseurs B.V.
drs. K. Verhoeven RA
FSV Accountants + Adviseurs B.V.
Laan van Westroijen 6
Postbus 298
4000 AG TIEL
Telefoon: (0344) 67 09 90
Telefax: (0344) 62 39 64
E-mail: Tiel@fsv.nl
Internet: www.fsv.nl
Handelsregister te Utrecht nr. 11020683
Lid van de vereniging SRA
Member of Nexia International
Vestigingen:
Amsterdam, Tiel,
Waalwijk, Zaltbommel

2009 financieel jaarverslag

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 2009 financieel jaarverslag

Similar to 2009 financieel jaarverslag (20)

More from Hapin - Papua Support Foundation

More from Hapin - Papua Support Foundation (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

2009 financieel jaarverslag