SlideShare a Scribd company logo
We can’t survive losing a day of work time right now, so while me getting there (and some of you, I assume) isn’t possible, we’re going to soldier on with an online-replacement version of WRA 210 for February 3, 2011. There will be a lot of writing (sorry!) but it shouldn’t be too exhaustive. And there will be some direction given by me, of course. We’ll make it work.  TODAY
First, a little fun. If you’re too young, or just too hip, to know– the title slide image is from a rapper named Snow’s first album ( get it? 12 inches of SNOW?). Here’s his hit video for you– Informer! A LIL FUN
Here’s the game plan: 1) Updates2) Explanation of what you’re going to do3) Prompts, prompts, prompts, prompts4) Forecasting next week 5) Homework And so I don’t say it over and over, as always, if you have questions email, IM, or call. I’m around. Don’t hesitate. TODAY
Okay, a few things: I will have module grades for you on Tuesday. I might post them to Engrade before then, but I want to be able to talk to you about them when you officially get them back. Some of you didn’t get my message about the Tumblr posts. I’m going to give you until Friday to get caught up/make them right. See next slide. UPDATES
From the syllabus:  For class, you will maintain a Tumblr blog. Each week you will complete three activities involving this blog. I’m going to put each of them on a new slide so you can see the three different things. Sorry if this seems like overkill to those of you who haven’t had problems, but I want to make sure it’s clear. I don’t want anyone to be confused.  TUMBLR
1) You will post in response to one of the texts we have read that week (your choice). You will pick some idea in the text then expand on it, reflect on it, interrogate it, or otherwise build upon your understanding. That is one post.  TUMBLR 1
2) You will post a reflection on the work you are doing. This should include notes about what nuts-and-bolts web design things you are learning and trying, but this is also a good place to pose questions. I will comb over these each weekend to plan class for the next week. That is a second post. TUMBLR 2
3) Once a week you should post some sort of web design resource or tutorial. This can be anything– a web page of resources, a step by step tutorial, a video, a podcast… anything you find out there that you think is useful. That is a third post.  That’s 3 a week.  For the first week, it’s okay if you only have one, but we’re now in week 4, so by Tuesday of next week you should have 10-12 Tumblr posts. TUMBLR 3
Your responses should be approximately 1-2 pages (or more) of text, but because this is a blog format, I’m going to sort of put you on the honor system. Engage with the material and reflect. I am confident you know how much writing indicates engagement. If I find after a few weeks that you’re not writing enough, we’ll talk about it. So it’s been a few weeks. Some of you are doing great. Some of you aren’t doing the work at all. I will email you individually if your posts right now aren’t solid enough, but if you don’t have posts, I’m not going to remind you again. You should have seven posts– at least-- right now. If you don’t have them by Friday, you’ll lose points.  TUMBLRS
3) Remember that Module 1 is due this week. I’m going to bump it back to the 13thso that we can discuss some coding options in class Tues and Thurs. You will likely want to use Weebly or to create a new Tumblr so you can use its web capabilities, but I will also show you how to start your own page in Dreamweaver on Tuesday.  UPDATES
We were going to use today doing some in-class discussion, but clearly we can’t simulate that (we could try to do it via chat, but then I’d have to get all of you online at once, and on short notice…). So instead, I’m going to present you with a series of prompts. There will be several. There are at least two questions for each reading (some have three or four). Your task is to do the following:1) Select one question from each set of prompts (A-F).  2) You will then answer that question with a paragraph (or two) and  3) email all your answers, in one document, to me. You will end up with SIX responses, one for each set of prompts.  THE ACTIVITY
When you have answered your chosen six questions (remember, a paragraph or two each), email the responses (make sure to label them with a letter and number, i.e. A3) to me at alexa325@msu.edu . You need to send your responses to me by  noon (12 pm) on Saturday, February 5th.   @alexa325@msu.edu
BEGIN PROMPTS
The first set of questions is from the reading Whitespace. We read it last week, so you might need to review.  Reminder (sorry to hammer this): pick one question from each set (A-F). That means from the next several slides (for reading A: Whitespace) pick ONE question to respond to, then move on to reading B, to reading C, etc. A: Whitespace
In the reading, Boulton says:  “In newspaper design, information is dense. Sometimes, as in web design, it’s difficult to add whitespace because of content requirements.” We ran across this issue with some of the websites groups chose for module 2 as well. Propose two different ways to handle the problem of too much content from a design/elegance standpoint. Remember that you will still have to please the “client” whoever that might be. Also remember there isn’t a “right” answer or a “wrong” answer as such. It’s about being creative.  A1
Bouton uses the phrase “visual comfort” in this reading. What does that mean? Give examples.  A2
Based on the reading, why does white space (or negative space) matter? Why is it worth careful consideration when crafting a design?  A3
Now we shift to chapter one of the book Designing with Web Standards.This prompt covers the preface and chapter 1, but none of the questions are specifically from the “before you begin” section.  B: CH1 DWS
Zeldman asserts that “99.9% of websites are obsolete.” What does he mean? How does one avoid this obsolescence?  B1
On page 15, Zeldman points out that old web browsers were “proprietary.” What’s that mean, and why was that such a bad thing?  B2
Zeldman claims that “backwards compatibility is a lie.” Why does he say this, what is his evidence, and why would we ever insist in such a thing (backwards compatibility) if it isn’t real?  B4
And so we shift to the reading Unwebbable.   C: UNWEBBABLE
The article starts with: “It’s time we came to grips with the fact that not every “document” can be a “web page.” Some forms of writing just cannot be expressed in HTML” Do you agree? Why or why not?  C1
Amid his reasoning why scripts won’t work as webpages, Clark says: “Nobody seriously intends screenplays on the web to have the same function they do in real life—getting read, getting optioned or bought, and getting shot. All of that happens on paper, not on Firefox.” From a designer’s standpoint, does that matter? Should we as those who do the digitizing work say “hey, no one is going to use this in a digital format?” Why or why not?  C2
Near the end of the article, Clark states: “Armed with this knowledge, what are we going to do? Prediction: nothing. People will continue to fake the appearance of scripts and use John August–caliber presentational code. But we do have an alternative.”  What is(are) his alternative(s)? Does it make sense?  C3
And next, the reading On Web Typography.  D: ON WEB…
What change has enabled designers to not be constrained to system standard fonts, and what powers/problems does this present?  D1
In this piece Santa Maria offers some rationale for why system fonts were a good idea and why non-system fonts could be serious trouble. Pick one of his reasons and explore it/talk about how you think it could help/hinder your design practices.  D2
What is “contrast” as described in this article? Give an example of a good contrasting pair of fonts and a bad pair (along with the reasons why) D3
Moving right along to Typography Matters. E: TYPOGRAPHY …
Why was typographical precision a problem in the past? How has that changed recently?  E1
Kissane tells us that readers have a less than ideal reading situation online. How does she propose we rectify that problem? Does that seem logical/applicable?  E2
And lastly, chapter 2 from Designing with Web Standards.  F: CHAPTER 2 DWS
Zeldman talks about the “cost of design” before web standards. What does he mean? What was the cost?  F1
What is the problem with a “desktop-centric” design? How do we avoid that?  F2
Where does Zeldman point to be “web forward?” How would this change our sense of how to code?  F3
When you have answered your chosen six questions (remember, a paragraph or two each), email the responses (make sure to label them with a letter and number, i.e. A3) to me at alexa325@msu.edu . You need to send your responses to me by  noon (12 pm) on Saturday, February 5th.   @alexa325@msu.edu
END PROMPTS
On Tuesday, we will talk about coding and make sure that you have a good sense of how to put together your Module 1 final project.We will also talk about your Module 2 grades and make sure we have everything squared away. On Thursday, we’ll talk more about module 3.  NEXT WEEK
For Tuesday, read Chapter 3 and 4 of DWS (p. 69-90). Your Twitter question for the weekend: how does class content and activity change when it goes online?  HOMEWORK
BONUS! Picking the Super Bowl winner via Website critique.
Good things about Steelers.com: Colors work well together Nice use of “steel” texture in background  Decent balance of content vs. white space Images and other prompts lead the eye well Good use of images, for the most part (what’s up with the guy on the story I capped?) Excellent palette management (the recurrence of the red and blue from the logo in the submenus, for example)
Bad things about Steelers.com: The yellow outlined boxes don’t work so well There’s a lot of stuff moving (go check it out) to distract the eye They went a little overboard self-promoting merchandise (I count 4 ads) Some things are in weird places (like their jobs link being under “tickets &stadium”)
Good things about Packers.com: Nicely muted yellow and green The logo pops.  The mild/light tones are easy on the eye without simply being white The use of color and images leads the eye well (at least “above” the fold) Nice high-res game photos dominate the front page making it dynamic
Bad things about Packers.com: I’m not digging the stripes in the background– it’s cheap new design move to give texture. There’s an element of the Packers.com page flush with the banner add at the top– not good The menus are soooo cumbersome The page looks great up top but really falls apart designwise as we scroll down. The change in the grid size makes it feel lopsided, and this happens twice.  Like the Steelers, there’s a lot of moving stuff.
THE VERDICT: The Steelers site is too dark, otherwise it’s great.The Packers site would be better, EXCEPT for the violations in the grid. It is, however, quite impressive.It’s a design push.
So… I go Steelers because my girlfriend is from Pittsburgh. HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND!

More Related Content

What's hot

Class 1
Class 1Class 1
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPointWRA 210 April 14th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPointMiami University
 
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybridEwrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
jordanlachance
 
5 writing a professional email desktop
5 writing a professional email desktop5 writing a professional email desktop
5 writing a professional email desktop
English Online Inc.
 
Business Blogging for Non-Writers
Business Blogging for Non-WritersBusiness Blogging for Non-Writers
Business Blogging for Non-Writers
couldbe studios
 
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybridEwrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
jordanlachance
 
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybridEwrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
jordanlachance
 
Class 1
Class 1Class 1

What's hot (9)

Class 1
Class 1Class 1
Class 1
 
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPointWRA 210 April 14th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 14th PowerPoint
 
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybridEwrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
Ewrt 1 a online introduction hybrid
 
5 writing a professional email desktop
5 writing a professional email desktop5 writing a professional email desktop
5 writing a professional email desktop
 
Class 1
Class 1Class 1
Class 1
 
Business Blogging for Non-Writers
Business Blogging for Non-WritersBusiness Blogging for Non-Writers
Business Blogging for Non-Writers
 
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybridEwrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
 
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybridEwrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
Ewrt 1 a class 1 hybrid
 
Class 1
Class 1Class 1
Class 1
 

Viewers also liked

Madison High School Announcements
Madison High School AnnouncementsMadison High School Announcements
Madison High School Announcementstiptongenevieve
 
Mindful test readonly
Mindful test readonlyMindful test readonly
Mindful test readonly
Hans Huo
 
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint version
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint versionPhill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint version
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint versionMiami University
 
Announcements1 2010.2011
Announcements1 2010.2011 Announcements1 2010.2011
Announcements1 2010.2011 tiptongenevieve
 
Visual rhetoricbjan 29th
Visual rhetoricbjan 29thVisual rhetoricbjan 29th
Visual rhetoricbjan 29th
Miami University
 
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-man
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-manBenjamin and Aura and Spider-man
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-man
Miami University
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Madison High School Announcements
Madison High School AnnouncementsMadison High School Announcements
Madison High School Announcements
 
Mindful test readonly
Mindful test readonlyMindful test readonly
Mindful test readonly
 
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint version
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint versionPhill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint version
Phill Alexander - Teachnology Statement: PowerPoint version
 
Announcements1 2010.2011
Announcements1 2010.2011 Announcements1 2010.2011
Announcements1 2010.2011
 
Visual rhetoricbjan 29th
Visual rhetoricbjan 29thVisual rhetoricbjan 29th
Visual rhetoricbjan 29th
 
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-man
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-manBenjamin and Aura and Spider-man
Benjamin and Aura and Spider-man
 

Similar to WRA 210 February 3, 2011 - Snow Day

Visual Rhetoric: Worlds Collide
Visual Rhetoric: Worlds CollideVisual Rhetoric: Worlds Collide
Visual Rhetoric: Worlds CollideMiami University
 
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
Miami University
 
Visual Rhetoric, August 28th
Visual Rhetoric, August 28thVisual Rhetoric, August 28th
Visual Rhetoric, August 28thMiami University
 
Naming Things (with notes)
Naming Things (with notes)Naming Things (with notes)
Naming Things (with notes)
Pete Nicholls
 
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28thENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
Miami University
 
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
Miami University
 
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid Content
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid ContentWRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid Content
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid ContentMiami University
 
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
Vaclav Krejci
 
Wireframing
WireframingWireframing
Wireframing
Miami University
 
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPointWRA 210 April 12th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPointMiami University
 
Blog project
Blog projectBlog project
Blog projectshara831
 

Similar to WRA 210 February 3, 2011 - Snow Day (20)

WRA 210 January 18, 2011
WRA 210 January 18, 2011WRA 210 January 18, 2011
WRA 210 January 18, 2011
 
WRA 210 January 20, 2011
WRA 210 January 20, 2011WRA 210 January 20, 2011
WRA 210 January 20, 2011
 
WRA 210 February 24, 2011
WRA 210 February 24, 2011WRA 210 February 24, 2011
WRA 210 February 24, 2011
 
WRA 210 January 25, 2011
WRA 210 January 25, 2011WRA 210 January 25, 2011
WRA 210 January 25, 2011
 
WRA 210 February 8. 2011
WRA 210 February 8. 2011WRA 210 February 8. 2011
WRA 210 February 8. 2011
 
January 29th PowerPoint
January 29th PowerPointJanuary 29th PowerPoint
January 29th PowerPoint
 
Visual Rhetoric: Worlds Collide
Visual Rhetoric: Worlds CollideVisual Rhetoric: Worlds Collide
Visual Rhetoric: Worlds Collide
 
WRA 210 February 1, 2011
WRA 210 February 1, 2011WRA 210 February 1, 2011
WRA 210 February 1, 2011
 
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
English/IMS 224, January 29th, 2013
 
Visual Rhetoric, August 28th
Visual Rhetoric, August 28thVisual Rhetoric, August 28th
Visual Rhetoric, August 28th
 
Naming Things (with notes)
Naming Things (with notes)Naming Things (with notes)
Naming Things (with notes)
 
Introduction toprogramming
Introduction toprogrammingIntroduction toprogramming
Introduction toprogramming
 
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28thENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
ENG IMS 224, Feb 28th
 
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
Digital Rhetoric and Writing for April 23
 
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid Content
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid ContentWRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid Content
WRA 150 Week 11 Hybrid Content
 
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
7 Best Text Effects in Microsoft Word
 
WRA 210 March 17th, 2011
WRA 210 March 17th, 2011WRA 210 March 17th, 2011
WRA 210 March 17th, 2011
 
Wireframing
WireframingWireframing
Wireframing
 
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPointWRA 210 April 12th PowerPoint
WRA 210 April 12th PowerPoint
 
Blog project
Blog projectBlog project
Blog project
 

More from Miami University

At nasty
At nastyAt nasty
Crap
CrapCrap
Rhetanal
RhetanalRhetanal
Visual Rhetoric 4
Visual Rhetoric 4Visual Rhetoric 4
Visual Rhetoric 4
Miami University
 
Visual Rhetoric 3
Visual Rhetoric 3Visual Rhetoric 3
Visual Rhetoric 3
Miami University
 
Capstone Day 3
Capstone Day 3Capstone Day 3
Capstone Day 3
Miami University
 
Capstone Day 4
Capstone Day 4Capstone Day 4
Capstone Day 4
Miami University
 
Capstone Day 2
Capstone Day 2Capstone Day 2
Capstone Day 2
Miami University
 
Capstone Day 1
Capstone Day 1Capstone Day 1
Capstone Day 1
Miami University
 
Visual Rhetoric 2
Visual Rhetoric 2Visual Rhetoric 2
Visual Rhetoric 2
Miami University
 
Visual Rhetoric 1
Visual Rhetoric 1Visual Rhetoric 1
Visual Rhetoric 1
Miami University
 
224 summerfinal
224 summerfinal224 summerfinal
224 summerfinal
Miami University
 
Dr philleval211
Dr philleval211Dr philleval211
Dr philleval211
Miami University
 
211 finalreview
211 finalreview211 finalreview
211 finalreview
Miami University
 
Week 2
Week 2Week 2
Brief Video Game History
Brief Video Game HistoryBrief Video Game History
Brief Video Game History
Miami University
 
Dungeons & Dragons history
Dungeons & Dragons historyDungeons & Dragons history
Dungeons & Dragons history
Miami University
 
Rhetoric of Advertising
Rhetoric of AdvertisingRhetoric of Advertising
Rhetoric of Advertising
Miami University
 
Logos
LogosLogos
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
Miami University
 

More from Miami University (20)

At nasty
At nastyAt nasty
At nasty
 
Crap
CrapCrap
Crap
 
Rhetanal
RhetanalRhetanal
Rhetanal
 
Visual Rhetoric 4
Visual Rhetoric 4Visual Rhetoric 4
Visual Rhetoric 4
 
Visual Rhetoric 3
Visual Rhetoric 3Visual Rhetoric 3
Visual Rhetoric 3
 
Capstone Day 3
Capstone Day 3Capstone Day 3
Capstone Day 3
 
Capstone Day 4
Capstone Day 4Capstone Day 4
Capstone Day 4
 
Capstone Day 2
Capstone Day 2Capstone Day 2
Capstone Day 2
 
Capstone Day 1
Capstone Day 1Capstone Day 1
Capstone Day 1
 
Visual Rhetoric 2
Visual Rhetoric 2Visual Rhetoric 2
Visual Rhetoric 2
 
Visual Rhetoric 1
Visual Rhetoric 1Visual Rhetoric 1
Visual Rhetoric 1
 
224 summerfinal
224 summerfinal224 summerfinal
224 summerfinal
 
Dr philleval211
Dr philleval211Dr philleval211
Dr philleval211
 
211 finalreview
211 finalreview211 finalreview
211 finalreview
 
Week 2
Week 2Week 2
Week 2
 
Brief Video Game History
Brief Video Game HistoryBrief Video Game History
Brief Video Game History
 
Dungeons & Dragons history
Dungeons & Dragons historyDungeons & Dragons history
Dungeons & Dragons history
 
Rhetoric of Advertising
Rhetoric of AdvertisingRhetoric of Advertising
Rhetoric of Advertising
 
Logos
LogosLogos
Logos
 
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
411 Personal Logo PowerPoint
 

WRA 210 February 3, 2011 - Snow Day

  • 1.
  • 2. We can’t survive losing a day of work time right now, so while me getting there (and some of you, I assume) isn’t possible, we’re going to soldier on with an online-replacement version of WRA 210 for February 3, 2011. There will be a lot of writing (sorry!) but it shouldn’t be too exhaustive. And there will be some direction given by me, of course. We’ll make it work. TODAY
  • 3. First, a little fun. If you’re too young, or just too hip, to know– the title slide image is from a rapper named Snow’s first album ( get it? 12 inches of SNOW?). Here’s his hit video for you– Informer! A LIL FUN
  • 4. Here’s the game plan: 1) Updates2) Explanation of what you’re going to do3) Prompts, prompts, prompts, prompts4) Forecasting next week 5) Homework And so I don’t say it over and over, as always, if you have questions email, IM, or call. I’m around. Don’t hesitate. TODAY
  • 5. Okay, a few things: I will have module grades for you on Tuesday. I might post them to Engrade before then, but I want to be able to talk to you about them when you officially get them back. Some of you didn’t get my message about the Tumblr posts. I’m going to give you until Friday to get caught up/make them right. See next slide. UPDATES
  • 6. From the syllabus: For class, you will maintain a Tumblr blog. Each week you will complete three activities involving this blog. I’m going to put each of them on a new slide so you can see the three different things. Sorry if this seems like overkill to those of you who haven’t had problems, but I want to make sure it’s clear. I don’t want anyone to be confused. TUMBLR
  • 7. 1) You will post in response to one of the texts we have read that week (your choice). You will pick some idea in the text then expand on it, reflect on it, interrogate it, or otherwise build upon your understanding. That is one post. TUMBLR 1
  • 8. 2) You will post a reflection on the work you are doing. This should include notes about what nuts-and-bolts web design things you are learning and trying, but this is also a good place to pose questions. I will comb over these each weekend to plan class for the next week. That is a second post. TUMBLR 2
  • 9. 3) Once a week you should post some sort of web design resource or tutorial. This can be anything– a web page of resources, a step by step tutorial, a video, a podcast… anything you find out there that you think is useful. That is a third post. That’s 3 a week. For the first week, it’s okay if you only have one, but we’re now in week 4, so by Tuesday of next week you should have 10-12 Tumblr posts. TUMBLR 3
  • 10. Your responses should be approximately 1-2 pages (or more) of text, but because this is a blog format, I’m going to sort of put you on the honor system. Engage with the material and reflect. I am confident you know how much writing indicates engagement. If I find after a few weeks that you’re not writing enough, we’ll talk about it. So it’s been a few weeks. Some of you are doing great. Some of you aren’t doing the work at all. I will email you individually if your posts right now aren’t solid enough, but if you don’t have posts, I’m not going to remind you again. You should have seven posts– at least-- right now. If you don’t have them by Friday, you’ll lose points. TUMBLRS
  • 11. 3) Remember that Module 1 is due this week. I’m going to bump it back to the 13thso that we can discuss some coding options in class Tues and Thurs. You will likely want to use Weebly or to create a new Tumblr so you can use its web capabilities, but I will also show you how to start your own page in Dreamweaver on Tuesday. UPDATES
  • 12. We were going to use today doing some in-class discussion, but clearly we can’t simulate that (we could try to do it via chat, but then I’d have to get all of you online at once, and on short notice…). So instead, I’m going to present you with a series of prompts. There will be several. There are at least two questions for each reading (some have three or four). Your task is to do the following:1) Select one question from each set of prompts (A-F). 2) You will then answer that question with a paragraph (or two) and 3) email all your answers, in one document, to me. You will end up with SIX responses, one for each set of prompts. THE ACTIVITY
  • 13. When you have answered your chosen six questions (remember, a paragraph or two each), email the responses (make sure to label them with a letter and number, i.e. A3) to me at alexa325@msu.edu . You need to send your responses to me by noon (12 pm) on Saturday, February 5th. @alexa325@msu.edu
  • 15. The first set of questions is from the reading Whitespace. We read it last week, so you might need to review. Reminder (sorry to hammer this): pick one question from each set (A-F). That means from the next several slides (for reading A: Whitespace) pick ONE question to respond to, then move on to reading B, to reading C, etc. A: Whitespace
  • 16. In the reading, Boulton says: “In newspaper design, information is dense. Sometimes, as in web design, it’s difficult to add whitespace because of content requirements.” We ran across this issue with some of the websites groups chose for module 2 as well. Propose two different ways to handle the problem of too much content from a design/elegance standpoint. Remember that you will still have to please the “client” whoever that might be. Also remember there isn’t a “right” answer or a “wrong” answer as such. It’s about being creative. A1
  • 17. Bouton uses the phrase “visual comfort” in this reading. What does that mean? Give examples. A2
  • 18. Based on the reading, why does white space (or negative space) matter? Why is it worth careful consideration when crafting a design? A3
  • 19. Now we shift to chapter one of the book Designing with Web Standards.This prompt covers the preface and chapter 1, but none of the questions are specifically from the “before you begin” section. B: CH1 DWS
  • 20. Zeldman asserts that “99.9% of websites are obsolete.” What does he mean? How does one avoid this obsolescence? B1
  • 21. On page 15, Zeldman points out that old web browsers were “proprietary.” What’s that mean, and why was that such a bad thing? B2
  • 22. Zeldman claims that “backwards compatibility is a lie.” Why does he say this, what is his evidence, and why would we ever insist in such a thing (backwards compatibility) if it isn’t real? B4
  • 23. And so we shift to the reading Unwebbable. C: UNWEBBABLE
  • 24. The article starts with: “It’s time we came to grips with the fact that not every “document” can be a “web page.” Some forms of writing just cannot be expressed in HTML” Do you agree? Why or why not? C1
  • 25. Amid his reasoning why scripts won’t work as webpages, Clark says: “Nobody seriously intends screenplays on the web to have the same function they do in real life—getting read, getting optioned or bought, and getting shot. All of that happens on paper, not on Firefox.” From a designer’s standpoint, does that matter? Should we as those who do the digitizing work say “hey, no one is going to use this in a digital format?” Why or why not? C2
  • 26. Near the end of the article, Clark states: “Armed with this knowledge, what are we going to do? Prediction: nothing. People will continue to fake the appearance of scripts and use John August–caliber presentational code. But we do have an alternative.” What is(are) his alternative(s)? Does it make sense? C3
  • 27. And next, the reading On Web Typography. D: ON WEB…
  • 28. What change has enabled designers to not be constrained to system standard fonts, and what powers/problems does this present? D1
  • 29. In this piece Santa Maria offers some rationale for why system fonts were a good idea and why non-system fonts could be serious trouble. Pick one of his reasons and explore it/talk about how you think it could help/hinder your design practices. D2
  • 30. What is “contrast” as described in this article? Give an example of a good contrasting pair of fonts and a bad pair (along with the reasons why) D3
  • 31. Moving right along to Typography Matters. E: TYPOGRAPHY …
  • 32. Why was typographical precision a problem in the past? How has that changed recently? E1
  • 33. Kissane tells us that readers have a less than ideal reading situation online. How does she propose we rectify that problem? Does that seem logical/applicable? E2
  • 34. And lastly, chapter 2 from Designing with Web Standards. F: CHAPTER 2 DWS
  • 35. Zeldman talks about the “cost of design” before web standards. What does he mean? What was the cost? F1
  • 36. What is the problem with a “desktop-centric” design? How do we avoid that? F2
  • 37. Where does Zeldman point to be “web forward?” How would this change our sense of how to code? F3
  • 38. When you have answered your chosen six questions (remember, a paragraph or two each), email the responses (make sure to label them with a letter and number, i.e. A3) to me at alexa325@msu.edu . You need to send your responses to me by noon (12 pm) on Saturday, February 5th. @alexa325@msu.edu
  • 40. On Tuesday, we will talk about coding and make sure that you have a good sense of how to put together your Module 1 final project.We will also talk about your Module 2 grades and make sure we have everything squared away. On Thursday, we’ll talk more about module 3. NEXT WEEK
  • 41. For Tuesday, read Chapter 3 and 4 of DWS (p. 69-90). Your Twitter question for the weekend: how does class content and activity change when it goes online? HOMEWORK
  • 42. BONUS! Picking the Super Bowl winner via Website critique.
  • 43.
  • 44. Good things about Steelers.com: Colors work well together Nice use of “steel” texture in background Decent balance of content vs. white space Images and other prompts lead the eye well Good use of images, for the most part (what’s up with the guy on the story I capped?) Excellent palette management (the recurrence of the red and blue from the logo in the submenus, for example)
  • 45. Bad things about Steelers.com: The yellow outlined boxes don’t work so well There’s a lot of stuff moving (go check it out) to distract the eye They went a little overboard self-promoting merchandise (I count 4 ads) Some things are in weird places (like their jobs link being under “tickets &stadium”)
  • 46.
  • 47. Good things about Packers.com: Nicely muted yellow and green The logo pops. The mild/light tones are easy on the eye without simply being white The use of color and images leads the eye well (at least “above” the fold) Nice high-res game photos dominate the front page making it dynamic
  • 48. Bad things about Packers.com: I’m not digging the stripes in the background– it’s cheap new design move to give texture. There’s an element of the Packers.com page flush with the banner add at the top– not good The menus are soooo cumbersome The page looks great up top but really falls apart designwise as we scroll down. The change in the grid size makes it feel lopsided, and this happens twice. Like the Steelers, there’s a lot of moving stuff.
  • 49. THE VERDICT: The Steelers site is too dark, otherwise it’s great.The Packers site would be better, EXCEPT for the violations in the grid. It is, however, quite impressive.It’s a design push.
  • 50. So… I go Steelers because my girlfriend is from Pittsburgh. HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND!