Nicole Deese, M.S.  OOHN Intern  August 4 th , 2009 Workplace Violence in Retail: Controls that Work
Coming Up Scary Statistics Risk Factors in Retail Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Research on What Works Summary
Quick Stats - 2007 5488 Total Workplace Fatalities 835 Falls 488 Exposure to Harmful Substances 151 Fire and Explosions 22 Bodily Reaction and Exertion 839 Assaults & Violent Events 916 Contact with Objects 2234 Transportation Accidents
Quick Stats
Risk Factors in Retail
Risk Factors Cash
Risk Factors Public
Risk Factors Few People
Risk Factors Night time work
Risk Factors Poor Visibility
Risk Factors Easy Escape
Controls that Work
General Duty Clause 5(a)(1) Employer failed to keep workplace safe Hazard was recognized Hazard was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm Feasible and useful way to correct it Proposed abatement would significantly reduce the hazard
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Main Idea:  Potential criminals think logically- weighing the pros & cons Make the pros & cons in our favor Increasing barriers Decreasing perceived rewards Most Effective is a Combination of Controls!
Convenience Stores Associated with Reduced Risk: Employee Training Security Systems Bullet-Resistant Shielding ATM Machines Cash Handling Policies Hendricks, et al., 1999
Cash-Handling Policies
Signage
Gas Stations, Motels, Liquor Stores Intervention (How): Safe Cash Handling Training Accessibility Signage Lighting Peek-Asa et al., 2004 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : High Compliers:  5%  Decrease  in Crime Low Compliers:  28%  Increase  in Crime Look up control risk n  = 314 (intervention) n  = 96 (control)
Lighting - Outside
Lighting- Indoors
Liquor Stores Intervention (How): Lighting Training Escape Routes Visibility Casteel et al., 2004 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : 82%   Reduction  in Robbery Control Group Increase n  = 9 (intervention) n  = 13 (control)
Visibility
Retail - Variety Intervention (How): Cash Handling Safe Signage Visibility & Lighting Training Accessibility Casteel et al., 2008 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : High Compliers:  26%   Lower  Violent Crime Rate vs. Control 41%   Lower  Robbery & Attempted vs. Control n  = 305 (intervention) n  = 96 (control)
Accessibility - Outside
Accessibility - Indoors Counter Goodies Door Door Door Goodies
Convenience Stores Intervention: Visibility & Lighting Counter Location Signage Time-Release Safe Clifton, 1987 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : 64%  Decrease in Robberies n  = 47 Stores
Buddy System Butterworth, 1991
State Plans Several State plans address WPV in retail:  New Mexico Washington California Others address WPV in the healthcare setting and/or public sector: Oregon New York Delaware
Summary CPTED- Reduce perceived gains, increase barriers. Most effective to use several controls together. Reduced crime rates by up to  82%! Hope this would be helpful to OSHA’s enforcement team.
Questions or Comments? Thank you!
 

Workplace Violence Retail Slides

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Nicole Deese, M.S. OOHN Intern August 4 th , 2009 Workplace Violence in Retail: Controls that Work
  • 3.
    Coming Up ScaryStatistics Risk Factors in Retail Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Research on What Works Summary
  • 4.
    Quick Stats -2007 5488 Total Workplace Fatalities 835 Falls 488 Exposure to Harmful Substances 151 Fire and Explosions 22 Bodily Reaction and Exertion 839 Assaults & Violent Events 916 Contact with Objects 2234 Transportation Accidents
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    General Duty Clause5(a)(1) Employer failed to keep workplace safe Hazard was recognized Hazard was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm Feasible and useful way to correct it Proposed abatement would significantly reduce the hazard
  • 15.
    Crime Prevention ThroughEnvironmental Design (CPTED) Main Idea: Potential criminals think logically- weighing the pros & cons Make the pros & cons in our favor Increasing barriers Decreasing perceived rewards Most Effective is a Combination of Controls!
  • 16.
    Convenience Stores Associatedwith Reduced Risk: Employee Training Security Systems Bullet-Resistant Shielding ATM Machines Cash Handling Policies Hendricks, et al., 1999
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Gas Stations, Motels,Liquor Stores Intervention (How): Safe Cash Handling Training Accessibility Signage Lighting Peek-Asa et al., 2004 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : High Compliers: 5% Decrease in Crime Low Compliers: 28% Increase in Crime Look up control risk n = 314 (intervention) n = 96 (control)
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Liquor Stores Intervention(How): Lighting Training Escape Routes Visibility Casteel et al., 2004 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : 82% Reduction in Robbery Control Group Increase n = 9 (intervention) n = 13 (control)
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Retail - VarietyIntervention (How): Cash Handling Safe Signage Visibility & Lighting Training Accessibility Casteel et al., 2008 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : High Compliers: 26% Lower Violent Crime Rate vs. Control 41% Lower Robbery & Attempted vs. Control n = 305 (intervention) n = 96 (control)
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Accessibility - IndoorsCounter Goodies Door Door Door Goodies
  • 27.
    Convenience Stores Intervention:Visibility & Lighting Counter Location Signage Time-Release Safe Clifton, 1987 Outcome / Reduction of Risk : 64% Decrease in Robberies n = 47 Stores
  • 28.
  • 29.
    State Plans SeveralState plans address WPV in retail: New Mexico Washington California Others address WPV in the healthcare setting and/or public sector: Oregon New York Delaware
  • 30.
    Summary CPTED- Reduceperceived gains, increase barriers. Most effective to use several controls together. Reduced crime rates by up to 82%! Hope this would be helpful to OSHA’s enforcement team.
  • 31.
  • 32.