BeijingCambridgeChicagoDelhiDubaiHong KongJohannesburgLondonLos AngelesMadridManilaSocial Change with a Network MindsetStanford Nonprofit Management Institute Oct. 7, 2009Heather McLeod Grantheather_grant@monitor.comMoscowMumbaiMunichNew YorkPalo AltoParisSan FranciscoSão PauloSeoulShanghaiSingaporeTokyoTorontoThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.Zurich
Who is the Monitor Institute?We are… part consulting firm, drawing on the talents of our own dedicated team and the resources of the global professional services firm, Monitor Group. part think tank, analyzing and anticipating important shifts in the rapidly changing context that leaders must navigate. part incubatorof new approaches.  We work with clients and partners to test and prove new models for social impact.
How can Networks Accelerate Social Impact?In partnership with the David & Lucile Packard Foundation, Monitor Institute explored the role of social networks and social media in the non-profit sector
Theory: Building Our Knowledge (IP)Convened ExpertsScanned LiteratureScanning EnvironmentNetwork Resources InventoryCase Study ResearchToolsandTrainingBlog
Action: Pilot ProjectsEcosystem-Based Management (EBM) NetworksNitrogen WikiMapping Networks in SalinasNetwork Effectiveness (ONE) SupportFarm Bill Network Mapping
Monitor Institute’s Network PracticePublications: “Working Wikily 2.0”Knowledge BuildingBlog: workingwikily.netMembership Organizations ResearchCapacity Building & CoPsNet Effectiveness Working Sessions Network of Network Funders COPClient ServiceIntegration of Net Effectiveness into TMI toolkitProjects with Monitor Institute clients
Objectives for Today’s PresentationShare network frameworks and tools that we’ve developedUse brief “case studies” to illustrate network approachesHelp you be more effective in your networks
What are Networks?Groups of individuals or organizations connected through meaningful relationships.
We’re most Interested in Networks With…Many participantsAbility to self-organize Fueled by new technologiesCollaborative mindset and behaviorsSource of photo: http://www.midnightpoutine.ca/archives/flashmob1.jpg
Networks Have Been Around Forever…
New Technologies for Sharing Content……New Online Spaces for Building Relationships
Advances in Our Understanding of Networks…“If someone tells you that you can influence 1,000 people, it changes your way of seeing the world.”Dr. James Fowler …Combined with Established Group Processes
“Working Wikily” = With a Network Mindset“… wikis and other social media tools are engendering a new, networked mindset—a way of working wikily—that is characterized by principles of openness, transparency, decentralized decision-making, and distributed action. " - Working Wikily 2.0
What Do We Mean by “Working Wikily”?Established Ways of WorkingWorking WikilyDecentralized
Loosely controlled
Emergent
Open, shared
Relational
Two-way conversationsCentralized
Firmly controlled
Planned
Proprietary
Transactional
One-way communicationsWhere are you? The answer will be different for different situations
Obama Used Networks to Mobilize 13 M Supporters“One of my fundamental beliefs…is that real change comes from the bottom up.  And there’s no more powerful tool for grass-roots organizing than the Internet.”Barack Obama His Administration is Experimenting with Gov. 2.0“We live in an age of democratic experimentation — both in our official institutions and in the many informal ways in which the public is consulted”James Fishkin, Stanford political scientistSource:  Whitehouse.gov; NY Times
250K Individuals Coordinated Protests  “Ordinary folks are using the power of the Internet to organize. In the old days, organizing large groups of people required an organization. Now people can coordinate themselves.”Wall Street Journal, April 15, 2009Twitter “Emboldened” Iranian Election Protesters “If anyone had questions about the power of citizen media, those questions were answered by the Iran protests.”HamidTehrani (Iran editor for Global Voices)Source: ethanzuckerman.com/blog  Twitter, youTube Time Magazine
We’re Witnessing the Death of Old Models…“While newspaper circulation has long been in decline, the latest figures show the drop is accelerating…Weekday circulation declined 7.1% for the six months that ended March 31, compared with the previous year.”New York Times, April 27,2009…And New Models Are Emerging
The Way Our Work Gets Done Is Changing
Nonprofits Need to Find Ways to Work WikilyIncreasing Number of NonprofitsMany Nonprofits Not at ScaleMore Competition for Resources82% of Nonprofits operate on less than $1M in budgetCenter for Nonprofits ‘07Networks are one answer for increasing scale, efficiency,                coordination, and impactSource: “Index of National Fundraising Performance, 2009 First Calendar Quarter Results”, Target Analytics, 2009, Alliance Trends
Networks Can Address Diverse ChallengesWorking Wikily PotentialProblemIsolation
Unmet needs
Lack of power
Duplication and fragmentation of effort
Lack of shared knowledge
Untapped talent and wisdom
Suboptimal impact and challenges with growth
Build community
Engage people
Advocate for policy change
Coordinate resources and services
Develop and share knowledge
Innovate
Get to scaleBuild Community2008:162 Countries400,000 Ministers / Priests1980:205 Members
Engage People2008: 400,000 Volunteers in 104 Countries1985:Single-site Effort in US
Advocate for Policy Change 2009: 5+ Million Members1998: Email to100 friends
Coordinate Resources and ServicesTotal Loans2009: $66 millionTotal Loans2006: $1 million
Develop and Share Knowledge14 Countries1,300 Trained VolunteersInteragency Program Integrated Fire Management
Innovate“Open Sourcing Social Solutions”Internal, Proprietary R&D Labs
- EGYPT- Get to Scale…transformingcommunities through collaborations to address root causes of poverty and homelessnessTypical HFH country programs produce 200 houses each yearIn Egypt, HFH builds 1,000 houses a year, on averageSource: Jane Wei-Skillern and Kerry Herman, “Habitat for Humanity—Egypt,” Harvard Business School Cases, October 3, 2006.
Quick Conversations ExerciseTurn to your neighbor and share:A personal network I’m part of and purpose. . .A network I’ve worked with professionally. . . My biggest questions are…Source: June Holley
Understanding NetworksSource: orgnet
A Typology of Organizing StructuresCentralizedNonprofit organizations (withoutnetwork structure)
Membership organizations
Nonprofits with explicit network structure
Coalition / Alliance
Networks of networks
Ad hoc networksDecentralizedNote: These categories often overlap. Most of the examples fit in to multiple categories.Developed from: Plastrik and Taylor, “Net Gains,” (2006); Patti Anklam, “Net Work,” (2007); Krebs and Holley. “Building Smart Communities,” (2006).Source: orgnet
How Do Movements and Campaigns Relate to Networks?MovementCampaignNetworkA large, informal grouping that brings people together around shared values, and provides strategy and structure for collective actionAn organized effort which attempts to persuade others to change certain ideas, attitudes, practices, or behavior Groups of individuals or organizations connected through meaningful relationshipsChoose Justice: Campaign to Protect  RoePro-Choice MovementSources: Movement def’n- LokmanTsui on Marshall Ganz (www.lokman.org). Campaign def’n- Kotter Philip, Ned Roberto and Nancy Lee. Social Marketing: Improving the Quality of Life. Movement image - commondreams.org. Network graphics: orgnet.com

Working Wikily SSIR Presentation

  • 1.
    BeijingCambridgeChicagoDelhiDubaiHong KongJohannesburgLondonLos AngelesMadridManilaSocialChange with a Network MindsetStanford Nonprofit Management Institute Oct. 7, 2009Heather McLeod Grantheather_grant@monitor.comMoscowMumbaiMunichNew YorkPalo AltoParisSan FranciscoSão PauloSeoulShanghaiSingaporeTokyoTorontoThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.Zurich
  • 2.
    Who is theMonitor Institute?We are… part consulting firm, drawing on the talents of our own dedicated team and the resources of the global professional services firm, Monitor Group. part think tank, analyzing and anticipating important shifts in the rapidly changing context that leaders must navigate. part incubatorof new approaches. We work with clients and partners to test and prove new models for social impact.
  • 3.
    How can NetworksAccelerate Social Impact?In partnership with the David & Lucile Packard Foundation, Monitor Institute explored the role of social networks and social media in the non-profit sector
  • 4.
    Theory: Building OurKnowledge (IP)Convened ExpertsScanned LiteratureScanning EnvironmentNetwork Resources InventoryCase Study ResearchToolsandTrainingBlog
  • 5.
    Action: Pilot ProjectsEcosystem-BasedManagement (EBM) NetworksNitrogen WikiMapping Networks in SalinasNetwork Effectiveness (ONE) SupportFarm Bill Network Mapping
  • 6.
    Monitor Institute’s NetworkPracticePublications: “Working Wikily 2.0”Knowledge BuildingBlog: workingwikily.netMembership Organizations ResearchCapacity Building & CoPsNet Effectiveness Working Sessions Network of Network Funders COPClient ServiceIntegration of Net Effectiveness into TMI toolkitProjects with Monitor Institute clients
  • 7.
    Objectives for Today’sPresentationShare network frameworks and tools that we’ve developedUse brief “case studies” to illustrate network approachesHelp you be more effective in your networks
  • 8.
    What are Networks?Groupsof individuals or organizations connected through meaningful relationships.
  • 9.
    We’re most Interestedin Networks With…Many participantsAbility to self-organize Fueled by new technologiesCollaborative mindset and behaviorsSource of photo: http://www.midnightpoutine.ca/archives/flashmob1.jpg
  • 10.
    Networks Have BeenAround Forever…
  • 11.
    New Technologies forSharing Content……New Online Spaces for Building Relationships
  • 12.
    Advances in OurUnderstanding of Networks…“If someone tells you that you can influence 1,000 people, it changes your way of seeing the world.”Dr. James Fowler …Combined with Established Group Processes
  • 13.
    “Working Wikily” =With a Network Mindset“… wikis and other social media tools are engendering a new, networked mindset—a way of working wikily—that is characterized by principles of openness, transparency, decentralized decision-making, and distributed action. " - Working Wikily 2.0
  • 14.
    What Do WeMean by “Working Wikily”?Established Ways of WorkingWorking WikilyDecentralized
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    One-way communicationsWhere areyou? The answer will be different for different situations
  • 25.
    Obama Used Networksto Mobilize 13 M Supporters“One of my fundamental beliefs…is that real change comes from the bottom up. And there’s no more powerful tool for grass-roots organizing than the Internet.”Barack Obama His Administration is Experimenting with Gov. 2.0“We live in an age of democratic experimentation — both in our official institutions and in the many informal ways in which the public is consulted”James Fishkin, Stanford political scientistSource: Whitehouse.gov; NY Times
  • 26.
    250K Individuals CoordinatedProtests “Ordinary folks are using the power of the Internet to organize. In the old days, organizing large groups of people required an organization. Now people can coordinate themselves.”Wall Street Journal, April 15, 2009Twitter “Emboldened” Iranian Election Protesters “If anyone had questions about the power of citizen media, those questions were answered by the Iran protests.”HamidTehrani (Iran editor for Global Voices)Source: ethanzuckerman.com/blog Twitter, youTube Time Magazine
  • 27.
    We’re Witnessing theDeath of Old Models…“While newspaper circulation has long been in decline, the latest figures show the drop is accelerating…Weekday circulation declined 7.1% for the six months that ended March 31, compared with the previous year.”New York Times, April 27,2009…And New Models Are Emerging
  • 28.
    The Way OurWork Gets Done Is Changing
  • 29.
    Nonprofits Need toFind Ways to Work WikilyIncreasing Number of NonprofitsMany Nonprofits Not at ScaleMore Competition for Resources82% of Nonprofits operate on less than $1M in budgetCenter for Nonprofits ‘07Networks are one answer for increasing scale, efficiency, coordination, and impactSource: “Index of National Fundraising Performance, 2009 First Calendar Quarter Results”, Target Analytics, 2009, Alliance Trends
  • 30.
    Networks Can AddressDiverse ChallengesWorking Wikily PotentialProblemIsolation
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    Suboptimal impact andchallenges with growth
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
    Get to scaleBuildCommunity2008:162 Countries400,000 Ministers / Priests1980:205 Members
  • 44.
    Engage People2008: 400,000Volunteers in 104 Countries1985:Single-site Effort in US
  • 45.
    Advocate for PolicyChange 2009: 5+ Million Members1998: Email to100 friends
  • 46.
    Coordinate Resources andServicesTotal Loans2009: $66 millionTotal Loans2006: $1 million
  • 47.
    Develop and ShareKnowledge14 Countries1,300 Trained VolunteersInteragency Program Integrated Fire Management
  • 48.
    Innovate“Open Sourcing SocialSolutions”Internal, Proprietary R&D Labs
  • 49.
    - EGYPT- Getto Scale…transformingcommunities through collaborations to address root causes of poverty and homelessnessTypical HFH country programs produce 200 houses each yearIn Egypt, HFH builds 1,000 houses a year, on averageSource: Jane Wei-Skillern and Kerry Herman, “Habitat for Humanity—Egypt,” Harvard Business School Cases, October 3, 2006.
  • 50.
    Quick Conversations ExerciseTurnto your neighbor and share:A personal network I’m part of and purpose. . .A network I’ve worked with professionally. . . My biggest questions are…Source: June Holley
  • 51.
  • 52.
    A Typology ofOrganizing StructuresCentralizedNonprofit organizations (withoutnetwork structure)
  • 53.
  • 54.
    Nonprofits with explicitnetwork structure
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
    Ad hoc networksDecentralizedNote:These categories often overlap. Most of the examples fit in to multiple categories.Developed from: Plastrik and Taylor, “Net Gains,” (2006); Patti Anklam, “Net Work,” (2007); Krebs and Holley. “Building Smart Communities,” (2006).Source: orgnet
  • 58.
    How Do Movementsand Campaigns Relate to Networks?MovementCampaignNetworkA large, informal grouping that brings people together around shared values, and provides strategy and structure for collective actionAn organized effort which attempts to persuade others to change certain ideas, attitudes, practices, or behavior Groups of individuals or organizations connected through meaningful relationshipsChoose Justice: Campaign to Protect RoePro-Choice MovementSources: Movement def’n- LokmanTsui on Marshall Ganz (www.lokman.org). Campaign def’n- Kotter Philip, Ned Roberto and Nancy Lee. Social Marketing: Improving the Quality of Life. Movement image - commondreams.org. Network graphics: orgnet.com
  • 59.
    PeripheryClusterLinkNodeCoreHubA Few HelpfulDefinitionsSource: Monitor Institute
  • 60.
  • 61.
    Sociologists & Teachersin the 50sSource: June Holley
  • 62.
    Network Mapping canbe Low-Tech…Source: June Holley
  • 63.
  • 64.
    What’s Possible fromNetwork Analysis?Visualize the network: see connections
  • 65.
    Make visible networkresources, flow
  • 66.
    Spark a conversationamong participants
  • 67.
  • 68.
    Assess change innetwork over timeSource: June Holley
  • 69.
  • 70.
    Network by OrganizationTypeGovernmentFoundationNon-ProfitFor-ProfitSchoolUnknownReligiousOtherMaps Were Used to Analyze the NetworkA map of the different networks shows fairly loose connections
  • 71.
    Barr’s Green andHealthy Building Network: 2005Source: Barr Foundation “Green and Healthy Building Network Case Study” by Beth Tener, Al Neirenberg, Bruce Hoppe
  • 72.
    The Green andHealthy Building Network: 2007Source: Barr Foundation “Green and Healthy Building Network Case Study” by Beth Tener, Al Neirenberg, Bruce Hoppe
  • 73.
  • 74.
    Characteristics of HealthyNetworks: OverviewValueClearly articulated give and get for participants
  • 75.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78.
    High engagementParticipationFormBalance oftop-down and bottom-up logic
  • 79.
    Space for self-organizedactionLeadershipLeadership with “network mindset”
  • 80.
  • 81.
    Ample shared space:on-line and in-personCapacityAbility surface & tap network talent
  • 82.
    Model for sustainabilityLearning& AdaptationLearning-capture
  • 83.
    Ability to gatherand act on feedbackHelpful Sources: M. Kearns and K. Showalter; J. Holley and V. Krebs; P. Plastrik and M. Taylor; J. W. Skillern; C. Shirky
  • 84.
    Leading with aNetwork Mindset
  • 85.
    How is NetworkLeadership Different?Network LeadershipOrganizational LeadershipRole, behavior
  • 86.
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 95.
  • 96.
  • 97.
  • 98.
    Action-orientedWhat would ittake for you to work more wikily?
  • 99.
  • 100.
    Establishes first linksto participantsFunderProvides initial resources for organizing the networkWeaverWorks to increase connections among participants
  • 101.
    May focus ongrowing the network by connecting to new participants
  • 102.
    Can be multiplepeople with formal and informal rolesFacilitator / CoordinatorHelps participants to undertake collective action
  • 103.
    Ensures flow ofinformation and other resourcesTechnology StewardFacilitates the network use of online technology to learn, coordinate, connect or share information togetherSources: Peter Plastrik and Madeleine Taylor, Net Gains (2006); Beth Kanter; Stephanie Lowell , Building the Field of Dreams (2007); White, Wenger, and Smith, Digital Habitats (2009)
  • 104.
    What is theWork of Network Leadership?Convene diverse people and groupsEngage network participantsGenerate collective actionBroker connections and bridge differenceBuild social capital – emphasize trustNurture self-organizationGenuinely participateLeverage technologyCreate, and protect network ‘space’Source: Adapted from Net Work by Patti Anklam (2007) and “Vertigo and the Intentional Inhabitant: Leadership in a Connected World” by Bill Traynor (2009)Source of picture: flickr
  • 105.
    A Few ChallengesFaced by Network LeadersUnlearning past behaviors and frameworksEngaging and inspiring network participantsLetting go of controlDetermining network boundariesDealing with information overload Making the case; measuring successLearning and leveraging new technologies Source of images: Cut Throat Communications, Blog.com, Rutgers University RU FAIR, Kodaikanal International School, flickr
  • 106.
    Quick Conversations ExerciseTurnto your neighbor and share:Would any of these tools be valuable to help you understand your networks?How might you contribute to developing or leading a network?What are the barriers to working more wikily?
  • 107.
    How Can youBegin to Make the Shift?Established Ways of WorkingWorking WikilyDecentralized
  • 108.
  • 109.
  • 110.
  • 111.
  • 112.
  • 113.
  • 114.
  • 115.
  • 116.
  • 117.
    One-way communicationsWhat wouldit take for you to work more wikily?
  • 118.
    Eight Lessons We’reLearningDesign your experiments around a problem, not the toolsExperiment a lot, make only new mistakesSet appropriate expectations for time and effort requiredPrioritize human elements like trust and funUnderstand your position within networksPush power to the edgesBalance bottom-up and top-down strategiesBe open and transparent
  • 119.
    So, Whether You’reLaunching New Networks…Mom’s rising is new organization designed using network principles: open, flat, flexible, collaborative, adaptive, fast
  • 120.
    …or Transforming OldOrganizations…AJLI: an older organization using network principles to transform itself
  • 121.
    The Choice isYoursBoardExecutiveDirectorVPVPVPManagerManagerManagerManagerManagerManagerManagerManagerMEMBERS
  • 122.
    Thank You!Additional Resources:NetworksResources page on blogBarr FoundationIISC - collaborationLeadership Learning CommunityThinkers: Clay Shirky, Marshall Ganz, Peter Plastrik & Madeline Taylor, Bill Trainer, June Holley, Marty Kearns, etc.Beth’s Blog www.beth@typepad.orgWeAreMedia trainingN-Ten, TechSoup, Net-SquaredCase FoundationNew Organizing InstitutePersonal Democracy ForumBlog (twitter): www.workingwikily.netStanford ContinuingStudies, Winter ’10Website:www.monitorinstitute.com

Editor's Notes

  • #10 Not organizations (or markets)Not 2-way partnerships or alliancesInformal networking (cocktail parties)
  • #18 Obama has tried a number of interactive Internet applications for his governmentCitizen’s briefing book: initiated during the transition for citizens to submit their ideas to the president. 44,000 proposals and 1.4 million votesEmbarrassing results …. Highest ranking idea was about marijuana legalization (despite being in the middle of two wars and an economic recession) In March, Office of Science and Technology Policy crowd-sourced to see how to best become transparent Got good ideas as well as a bunch of unrelated, pithy debates Currently, Joe Biden and his “middleclass task force” asks for comments from web-users Also,Twitter, youtube, Facebook, Flickr all have whitehouse accounts to disseminate informationPositives of Gov 2.0Expectation that citizens are to be consulted about everything all the timeInternet, in democratizing access to facts and figures, encourages decisions based on facts Negatives of Gov 2.0Extermists (either positive or negative) are more likely to participate, pushing the moderate voice asideEasy to spread lies Groups can simulate support to take over the public voice
  • #21 Many upsets in the industry: closures, jobs lost, bankruptcy filings Rocky Mountain News folded; Boston Globe up for sale; SF Chronicle struggling; Seattle PI has gone online-only; Conde Nast closes Portfolio magazineTribune Company filed for bankruptcy reorganization in December 2008; GateHouse Media effectively broke by mid-2008; Journal Register, Philadelphia Newspapers, and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune went into bankruptcy early in 2009.According to the American Society of News Editors, 2,400 full-time professional newsroom jobs were lost at American dailies in 2007 and 5,900 more in 2008.Newspaper ad revenues fallen 23% in last two years.Chart highlights continuing losses in newspaper circulation in the US: Losses accelerated to 4.6 % daily and 4.8% Sunday, in the six months ending 30 Sep 2008. Chart represents aggregate data for US newspapers. Source: Deutsche Bank Securities in “State of the News Media 2009.”Online news consumption increased: number of unique visitors to newspaper websites each month was up 15.8% to 65 million in the third quarter of 2008 over a year earlier.Source: “State of the News Media 2009,” Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism, www.stateofthemedia.org
  • #22 Rise of non-profit (esp. investigative) and citizen journalism and new business modelsWeb allows news coverage to be increasingly “hyperlocal” Witness the rise of numerous online publications dedicated to covering only community news: Voice of San Diego, Chi-Town Daily News, MinnPost, New Haven Independent, Arizona GuardianVoice of San Diego: focuses on investigative reporting on local issues in San Diego. Maintains specific geographic focus without state or national coverage. Voice of San Diego, like many, is nonprofit corporation supported by foundations, donors, audience contributions, etc.Increasing popularity of news sites fostering amateur reporters filing pictures, stories, reports on local events: iReport, Twitter, uReportiReport: started by CNN, site contains user-generated content to tell the mainstream media about the “stories [they’re] not used to seeing”Twitter: during Mumbai terrorist attacks, information about militants and bloodshed posted in real time over Twitter News organizations experimenting with non-profit model and new business models, as revenue from traditional sources declines: Huffington Post, ProPublica, Global PostHuffington Post: over concern that layoffs at newspapers stunting investigative journalism, site announced it will collaborate with Atlantic Philanthropies to bankroll a group of investigative journalists (an initial budget of $1.75 million)ProPublica: seeing investigative journalism as being at risk (very expensive to produce), founders started non-profit organization with independent newsroom dedicated to investigative journalism (works with budget of $10 million)Global Post: focuses on international coverage. Content generated by correspondents who are paid in cash and given ownership in company—not staffers. Solicits ideas for stories from readers.“The advent of Internet and interactive web technologies has given rise to a new breed of citizen journalists, who are contributing and making news as the mainstream media.”Merinew, May 2, 2009“There is an option that might make [newspapers] stronger: Turn them into nonprofit, endowed institutions. [This] would enhance newspapers’ autonomy while shielding them from the economic forces that are now tearing them down.”New York Times, January 27,2009
  • #31 Top picture: “How to Improve Health for All” competitionBottom picture: “Tracking Trends and Ideas: Meeting Disaster” competition – entry: “Time to Take a Holistic View of disasters**Caption: “Indonesian children smile and cheer as U.S. Navy helicopters fly in purified water and relief supplies to a small village on the Island of Sumatra, Indonesia”
  • #58 When Institute started work with Packard two years ago/When Heather was researching her book, few of these books had been written, few blogs existedSince then, there has been an explosion in study of networks, attempt to gain understandingExplosion in blogs (Beth’s blog), books (Clay Shirky), events, training