Wireless Measurement and Control - Opportunities for Diagnostics Process Metrics Inferential Measurements and Eliminating Oscillations
Presented by Greg McMillan on March 15, 2011.
Wireless Measurement and Control - AIChE New Orleans
1. Wireless Measurement and Control - Opportunities for Diagnostics, Process Metrics, Inferential Measurements, and Eliminating Oscillations AIChE New Orleans Section Meeting March 15, 2011
2. Welcome Gregory K. McMillan Greg is a retired Senior Fellow from Solutia/Monsanto and an ISA Fellow. Greg was an adjunct professor in the Washington University Saint Louis Chemical Engineering Department 2001-2004. Presently, Greg contracts as a consultant in DeltaV R&D via CDI Process & Industrial. Greg received the ISA āKermit Fischer Environmentalā Award for pH control in 1991, the Control Magazine āEngineer of the Yearā Award for the Process Industry in 1994, was inducted into the Control āProcess Automation Hall of Fameā in 2001, was honored by InTech Magazine in 2003 as one of the most influential innovators in automation, and received the ISA Life Achievement Award in 2010. Greg is the author of numerous books on process control, his most recent being Advanced Temperature Measurement and Control. Greg has been the monthly āControl Talkā columnist for Control magazine since 2002. Gregās expertise is available on the web site: http://www.modelingandcontrol.com/
3. Top Ten Things You Donāt Want to Hear on a Startup (10) You need the owner to be a little more patient (supplier expert). (9) Donāt bother with a checkout - just light it up! What is the worst that can happen? (8) We didnāt do any simulation or testing. We decided that would spoil the adventure. (7) I donāt understand. It fit fine on the drawing. (6) Cool - This is my first time in a real plant (supplier expert). (5) I tried to open the valve and nothing happened. Wait! The same valve on the other reactor just opened. (4) Should the Variable Frequency Drive smoke like that? (3) I donāt understand. I am sure I left all your tools and radios in a box right here. (2) The CEO is holding on a phone for you. (1) Boom!!! WHAT was that?!?! Source: āFinal Word on Instrument Upgrade Projectsā, Control Talk, Control, Dec 2010 http://www.controlglobal.com/articles/2010/InstrumentProjects1012.html
4. ISA Automation Week - Oct 17-20 Process Automation Hall of Fame Speakers Charlie Cutler Bela Liptak Russ Rhinehart Greg McMillan Terry Tolliver
5. Advances in Smart Measurements Technological advances in sensing element technology Integration of multiple measurements Compensation of application and installation effects Online device diagnostics Digital signals with embedded extensive user selected information Wireless communication The out of the box accuracy of modern industrial instrumentation has improved by an order of magnitude. Consider the most common measurement device, the differential pressure transmitter (DP). The 0.25% accuracy of an analog electronic DP has improved to 0.025% accuracy for a smart microprocessor based DP. Furthermore, the analog DP accuracy often deteriorated to 2% when it was moved from the nice bench top setting to service outdoors in a nasty process with all its non-ideal effects of installation, process, and ambient effects [1][16]. A smart DP with its integrated compensation for non-ideal effects will stay close to its inherent 0.025% accuracy. Additionally a smart DP takes 10 years to drift as much as the analog DP did in 1 year.
6. Smart Transmitter Auxiliary Variables The availability of auxiliary process variables in a smart wireless pH transmitter, provide early indicators of performance problems. The use of these variables by online data analytics tools could detect abnormal conditions and predict sensor life.
7. Smart Transmitter Diagnostic Messages āFix Nowā and āFix Soonā alerts are provided along with common causes and recommended actions
8. Wireless Opportunities Wireless temperatures and differential pressures for packed absorber and distillation column hot spot and flow distribution analysis and control Wireless temperatures for finding the column control point with the largest and most symmetrical change in temperature with reflux/feed or steam/feed ratio Wireless temperatures for heat transfer coefficient metrics (fouling and frosting) Wireless temperatures and flows for measurement and control of reaction rate and crystallization rate from heat transfer (BTU/hr measurement and control) Wireless temperatures and differential pressures for fluidized bed reactor hot spot and flow distribution analysis and control Wireless temperatures and flows to debottleneck coolant systems Wireless pressures to debottleneck piping systems, monitor process filter operation, and track down the direction and source of pressure disturbances Wireless pressures to compute installed control valve characteristic (flow versus stroke) and variable speed drive installed characteristic (flow versus speed) Wireless instrumentation to increase the mobility, flexibility, and maintainability of lab and pilot plant experiments. Wireless pH and conductivity measurements for (1) Selecting the best sensor technology for a wide range of process conditions(2) Eliminating measurement noise(3) Predicting sensor demise(4) Developing process temperature compensation(5) Developing inferential measurements of process concentrations(6) Finding the optimum sensor location http://www.isa.org/InTechTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=80886
34. This cooperative industry/university program performs fundamental research of interest to chemical, biotechnological, petroleum refining, gas processing, pharmaceutical, and food companies.
35.
36. Effect of Ions on Conductivity Conductivity measures the concentration and mobility of ions. Plots of conductivity versus ion concentration will increase from zero concentration to a maximum as the number of ions in solution increases. The conductivity then falls off to the right of the maximum as the ions get crowded and start to interact or associate (group) reducing the ion mobility.
37. 40 oC Conductivity (milliSiemens/cm) 30 oC 20 oC Effect of Solvent on Conductivity Conductivity in the operating range of 25% to 30% by weight solvent is relatively unaffected by solvent concentration
38. Conductivity (milliSiemens/cm) 40 oC 30 oC 20 oC Effect of CO2 Load on Conductivity Conductivity shows good sensitivity to CO2 loading that can be fitted by a straight line whose slope depends upon temperature above 30 oC
39. Effect of Solvent on pH pH measures the activity of the hydrogen ion, which is the ion concentration multiplied by an activity coefficient. An increase in solvent concentration increases the pH by a decrease in the activity coefficient and a decrease in the ion concentration from a decrease per the water dissociation constant. pH is also affected by CO2 weight percent since pH changes with the concentration of carbonic acid. Density measurements by Micromotion meters provide an accurate inference of CO2 weight percent.
43. PID derivative mode is modified to compute a rate of change over the elapsed time from the last new measurement value
44. PID reset and rate action are only computed when there is a new value
45. If transmitter damping is set to make noise amplitude less than sensitivity limit, valve packing and battery life is dramatically improved
46. Enhancement compensates for measurement sample time suppressing oscillations and enabling a smooth recovery from a loss in communications further extending packing -battery lifeTD Kc TD Kc Link to PIDPlus White Paper http://www2.emersonprocess.com/siteadmincenter/PM%20DeltaV%20Documents/ Whitepapers/WP_DeltaV%20PID%20Enhancements%20for%20Wireless.pdf
47. Flow Setpoint Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
48. Flow Load Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
49. Flow Failure Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
50. pH Setpoint Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
51. pH Load Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
52. pH Failure Response - PIDPlus vs. Traditional PID Enhanced PID Sensor PV Traditional PID Sensor PV
53. PIDPlus Benefits Extend Far Beyond Wireless - 1 The PID enhancement for wireless (PIDPlus) offers an improvement wherever there is an update time in the loop. In the broadest sense, an update time can range from seconds (wireless updates and valve or measurement sensitivity limits) to hours (failures in communication, valve, or measurement). Some of the sources of update time are: Wireless measurement default update rate for periodic reporting (default update rate) Wireless measurement trigger level for exception reporting (trigger level) Wireless communication failure Broken pH electrode glass or lead wires (failure point is about 7 pH) Large valve operating on upper part of installed characteristic (low sensitivity) Valve with backlash (deadband) and stick-slip (resolution and sensitivity limit) Operating at split range point (discontinuity of no response to abrupt response) Valve with solids, high temperature, or sticky fluid that causes plugging or seizing Plugged impulse lines Analyzer sample processing delay and analysis or multiplex cycle time Analyzer resolution and sensitivity limit
54. PIDPlus Benefits Extend Far Beyond Wireless - 2 The PIDPlus executes when there a change in setpoint, feedforward, or remote output to provide an immediate reaction based on PID structure The improvement in control by the PIDPlus is most noticeable as the update time becomes much larger than the 63% process response time (defined in the white paper as the sum of the process deadtime and time constant). When the update time becomes 4 times larger than this 63% process response time that roughly corresponds to the 98% response time frequently cited in the literature, the feedforward and controller gains can be set to provide a complete correction for changes in the measurement and setpoint. Helps ignore inverse response and errors in feedforward timing Helps ignore discontinuity (e.g. steam shock) at split range point Helps extend packing life by reducing oscillations and hence valve travel Since the PIDPlus can be set to execute only upon a significant change in user valve position, the PIDPlus as a valve position controller offers less interaction and cycling for optimization of unit operations by increasing reactor feed, column feed or increasing refrigeration unit temperature, or decreasing compressor pressure till feed, vent, coolant, and/or steam, valves are at maximum good throttle position. Website entries on Enhanced PID Benefits http://www.modelingandcontrol.com/2010/08/wireless_pid_benefits_extend_t.html http://www.modelingandcontrol.com/2010/10/enhanced_pid_for_wireless_elim.html http://www.modelingandcontrol.com/2010/11/a_delay_of_any_sorts.html
55. Enhanced PID Traditional PID PID PV PID Output Limit Cycles from Valve Stick-Slip Enhanced PID Can Eliminate Valve Limit Cycles
56. Enhanced PID Can Maximize Production Rate ZC-3 TC-3 ZC-4 < maximum production rate CTW vent CAS ZC-2 PC-1 condenser CAS FC-1 < TT feed A FT PT CAS FC-2 RC-1 ratio CAS feed B TC-1 TT FT ZC-1 CAS coolant makeup TC-2 Valve Position Controllers (VPC) ZC-1,2,3,4 are enhanced PID with directional output velocity limiting and position noise band set to reduce interactions and limit cycling TT reactor product
57. Self-Regulating Process Open Loop Response Response to change in controller output with controller in manual % Controlled Variable (CV) or % Controller Output (CO) CV Kp = DCV / DCO Self-regulating process gain (%/%) CO Maximum speed in 4 deadtimes is critical speed DCV 0.63*DCV DCO Time (seconds) qo tp2 to or observed total loop deadtime Self-regulating process open loop negative feedback time constant
58. Response to change in controller output with controller in manual % Controlled Variable (CV) or % Controller Output (CO) CV Ki = { [ CV2/ Dt2 ] - [ CV1/ Dt1 ] } / DCO Integrating process gain (%/sec/%) CO DCO ramp rate is DCV2/ Dt2 ramp rate is DCV1 / Dt1 Time (seconds) qo observed total loop deadtime Integrating Process Open Loop Response Maximum speed in 4 deadtimes is critical speed Wireless Trigger Level > noise Wireless Default Update Rate
59. tā tā o p2 Runaway Process Open Loop Response Response to change in controller output with controller in manual % Controlled Variable (CV) or % Controller Output (CO) Kp = DCV / DCO Runaway process gain (%/%) Acceleration For safety reasons, tests are terminated after 4 deadtimes 1.72*DCV Maximum speed in 4 deadtimes is critical speed DCV DCO Noise Band Time (seconds) q or observed total loop deadtime o runaway process open loop positive feedback time constant
60. Kc Ti Td Loop Block Diagram (First Order Approximation) Delay Gain Lag qL Delay <=> Dead Time Lag <=>Time Constant KL tL ļDV Load Upset Delay Delay Lag Lag Gain Lag Delay Gain qv tp1 qp2 tp2 tv Kpv qp1 Kmv ļMV Process Valve ļPV Hopefullytp2is the largest lag in the loop For integrating processes: Ki = Kmv * (Kpv / tp2 ) * Kcv 100% / span ļCO % Local Set Point PID Ā½ of Wireless Default Update Rate % ļCV % Delay Lag Delay Lag Lag Gain tc1 tm2 qm2 tm1 qm1 Kcv qc tc2 Lag Delay Controller Measurement First Order Approximation: qo @ qv + qp1 + qp2 + qm1 + qm2 + qc + tv + tp1 + tm1 + tm2 + tc1 + tc2 (set by automation system design for flow, pressure, level, speed, surge, and static mixer pH control)
61. Ultimate Limit to Loop Performance Peak error is proportional to the ratio of loop deadtime to 63% response time (Important to prevent SIS trips, relief device activation, surge prevention, and RCRA pH violations) Total loop deadtime that is often set by automation design Ā½ of Wireless Default Update Rate is additional deadtime Largest lag in loop that is ideally set by large process volume Integrated error is proportional to the ratio of loop deadtime squared to 63% response time (Important to minimize quantity of product off-spec and total energy and raw material use)
62. Practical Limit to Loop Performance Peak error decreases as the controller gain increases but is essentially the open loop error for systems when total deadtime >> process time constant Open loop error for fastest and largest load disturbance Integrated error decreases as the controller gain increases and reset time decreases but is essentially the open loop error multiplied by the reset time plus signal delays and lags for systems when total deadtime >> process time constant Rise time (time to reach a new setpoint) is inversely proportional to controller gain
63. Fastest Controller Tuning (reaction curve method*) * - Ziegler Nichols method closed loop modified to be more robust and less oscillatory For self-regulating processes: Near integrator (tp2 >> qo): Deadtime dominant (tp2 << qo): 1.0 for Enhanced PID if Wireless Default Update Rate > Process Response Time ! For integrating processes: For runaway processes: Near integrator (tāp2 >> qo): These tuning equations provide maximum disturbance rejection but will cause some overshoot of setpoint response