Wikipedia’s Open Door
 and Closed Window:
Why People Join Wikipedia, Why They Leave, Whether it
   Matters and What (if Anything) to Do About It




         William Beutler • January 13, 2010
          #WikiWars • Bangalore, India
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Who Reads Wikipedia?

• People who want to know things and have
  an internet connection
    • That is to say, almost everyone
• For all its ubiquity, Wikipedia literacy is very
  low
    • Talk pages? Warning tags? Huh?

                                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Who Edits Wikipedia?
• Very, very, very few people
• Per Jimbo:
   • 50% of all edits performed by 0.7% of all
      editors (524 people)
    • 73% of all edits performed by 2% of all
      editors (1400 people)
• Per Aaron Swartz:
   • Yet the most active don’t always write
                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
80-20 Rule? Forget That

          50% by
           0.7%


         73% by 2



          The rest




 Edits               Editors




                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Do People Quit Wikipedia?


• Better question: Why do people join
  Wikipedia?
• Very few contribute in the first place
• Who says anyone is supposed to be
  continuously active in the first place?




                                      @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
What Wikipedia Really Is
•   The misleading PR speak:
        the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

•   The official language:
     	

a neutral and unbiased compilation of
     	

previously written, verifiable facts.

•   In reality, it is:
          a popular, simple and useful but unreliable, insular
          and very complicated background briefing.


                                                    @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Wikipedia is Complicated
Approx. 50 policies, 150+ site guidelines, more
 advisory essays often treated as enforceable




                                      @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
1 Header: Present in every article, givesarticle’s subject in
§
  and preview of the full article, with the
                                            a thumbnail sketch
                                                                                      2
  boldface. Should be no longer than 3 paragraphs, usually       1
  does not require citations.

                                                                     3
2 Infobox: Notwhere similarto every article, but May
§
  recommended
                 appropriate
                             subjects do have one.
  include image or not.                                          4

3
§   Contents: Appears automatically after creating 4 or more
    subsections following the Synopsis.


§   Body: Contains one or more paragraphs describing the
4   subject, with inline citations verifying important facts.



5 References:There are multiple forms of acceptable styles
§                 Proper formatting will automatically place
  citations here.                                                5
  of citation format.


                                                                 6
6 External links: Links to official website if any, other
§
  useful, ideally non-commercial articles.
                                                                 7

§   Categories: Added to bottom of article, groups with
7   similar articles for ease of navigation and sorting.
                                                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?


• TO HAVE FUN BY CAUSING MISCHIEF
   • Not banned yet / found a new IP address
      — STAY
    • Been there, done that, bored — LEAVE
    • Banned or blocked indefinitely — LEAVE

                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?



• TO SEE IF IT WORKS
   • Interest further piqued — STAY
   • Curiosity satisfied — LEAVE


                                  @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?


• TO ASSERT ONE’S BUREAUCRATIC OR
 KNOWLEDGE-BASED AUTHORITY
 • Adminship granted, etc. — STAY
 • Contributions respected — STAY
 • Adminship, contributions rejected — LEAVE

                                  @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?

• TO MAKE A POINT ON BEHALF OF
 ONESELF OR SOMEONE (OR
 SOMETHING) ELSE
 • Point made, interest piqued — STAY
 • Point made, nothing more to say — LEAVE
 • Point defeated — LEAVE

                                 @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?

• TO SHARE / MAKE USE OF
  ACCUMULATED KNOWLEDGE
 • Expertise valued, continually useful — STAY
 • Expertise exhausted, little more to say —
    LEAVE
 • Expertise rejected for stylistic / content
    reasons — LEAVE


                                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Why Join? Stay? Leave?

• TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING THE SUM OF
  ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE
 • Contribution meaningful — STAY
 • Lack of time — LEAVE
 • Frustrated by vandals, trolls — LEAVE
 • Disagree with direction of project — LEAVE

                                   @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Editing Wikipedia is Stressful




                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Raul’s Fifth Law of Wikipedia
• “Over time, contentious articles will grow
  from edit-war inspiring to eventually reach
  a compromise that is agreed upon by all
  the editors who have ot departed in
  exasperation. This equilibrium will
  inevitably be disturbed by new users who
  accuse the article of being absurdly one
  sided and who attempt to rewrite the
  entire article. This is the cyclical nature of
  controversial articles."

                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
The Vanishing




                @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
The... Downshifting?




                   @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Goodbye, Cruel World




                  @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Sometimes You Don’t Even Get This




                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Gone, But Not Forgotten




                    @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
What Does It Mean for
                  Participation?
        • Administrator activity Sept. ‘07—Mar. ‘09




Source: User:MBisanz                         @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
What Does It Mean for
                  Participation?
        • Number of hours between 5 million edits




Source: User:MBisanz                       @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Three Types of (Productive) Editors



• Original Authors of New Content
• Organizers of Existing Content
• Outside Interests Exerting Influence


                                    @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Bad Influence
• Rep. Dave Albo wouldn’t take “no” for an answer




                                    @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Positive Influence
• Article created by campaign voluneer with
  disclosure & understanding of the rules




                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Let’s Get Prescriptivist
• Recognition that volunteer “spirit” of
  Wikipedia is not the only model
• Assistance / engagement of expert groups,
  even ones with potential Conflict of Interest




                                      @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Let’s Get Prescriptivist
• Informal education — More FAQs, 101s, etc.
• Partipation by educators — WP involved in
    classroom assignments, not avoided




•
                                     @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
Thanks For Listening!

• See this again at: http://slideshare.net/williambeutler
• Wikipedia: User:WWB + User:NMS_Bill
• Twitter: @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
• The Wikipedian: http://thewikipedian.net
• Blog P.I.: http://blogpi.net
• E-mail: williambeutler@gmail.com

                                            @williambeutler • @thewikipedian

Wikipedia's Open Door and Closed Window

  • 1.
    Wikipedia’s Open Door and Closed Window: Why People Join Wikipedia, Why They Leave, Whether it Matters and What (if Anything) to Do About It William Beutler • January 13, 2010 #WikiWars • Bangalore, India
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Who Reads Wikipedia? •People who want to know things and have an internet connection • That is to say, almost everyone • For all its ubiquity, Wikipedia literacy is very low • Talk pages? Warning tags? Huh? @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 4.
    Who Edits Wikipedia? •Very, very, very few people • Per Jimbo: • 50% of all edits performed by 0.7% of all editors (524 people) • 73% of all edits performed by 2% of all editors (1400 people) • Per Aaron Swartz: • Yet the most active don’t always write @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 5.
    80-20 Rule? ForgetThat 50% by 0.7% 73% by 2 The rest Edits Editors @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 6.
    Why Do PeopleQuit Wikipedia? • Better question: Why do people join Wikipedia? • Very few contribute in the first place • Who says anyone is supposed to be continuously active in the first place? @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 7.
    What Wikipedia ReallyIs • The misleading PR speak: the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. • The official language: a neutral and unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts. • In reality, it is: a popular, simple and useful but unreliable, insular and very complicated background briefing. @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 8.
    Wikipedia is Complicated Approx.50 policies, 150+ site guidelines, more advisory essays often treated as enforceable @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 9.
    1 Header: Presentin every article, givesarticle’s subject in § and preview of the full article, with the a thumbnail sketch 2 boldface. Should be no longer than 3 paragraphs, usually 1 does not require citations. 3 2 Infobox: Notwhere similarto every article, but May § recommended appropriate subjects do have one. include image or not. 4 3 § Contents: Appears automatically after creating 4 or more subsections following the Synopsis. § Body: Contains one or more paragraphs describing the 4 subject, with inline citations verifying important facts. 5 References:There are multiple forms of acceptable styles § Proper formatting will automatically place citations here. 5 of citation format. 6 6 External links: Links to official website if any, other § useful, ideally non-commercial articles. 7 § Categories: Added to bottom of article, groups with 7 similar articles for ease of navigation and sorting. @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 10.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO HAVE FUN BY CAUSING MISCHIEF • Not banned yet / found a new IP address — STAY • Been there, done that, bored — LEAVE • Banned or blocked indefinitely — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 11.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO SEE IF IT WORKS • Interest further piqued — STAY • Curiosity satisfied — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 12.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO ASSERT ONE’S BUREAUCRATIC OR KNOWLEDGE-BASED AUTHORITY • Adminship granted, etc. — STAY • Contributions respected — STAY • Adminship, contributions rejected — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 13.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO MAKE A POINT ON BEHALF OF ONESELF OR SOMEONE (OR SOMETHING) ELSE • Point made, interest piqued — STAY • Point made, nothing more to say — LEAVE • Point defeated — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 14.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO SHARE / MAKE USE OF ACCUMULATED KNOWLEDGE • Expertise valued, continually useful — STAY • Expertise exhausted, little more to say — LEAVE • Expertise rejected for stylistic / content reasons — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 15.
    Why Join? Stay?Leave? • TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING THE SUM OF ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE • Contribution meaningful — STAY • Lack of time — LEAVE • Frustrated by vandals, trolls — LEAVE • Disagree with direction of project — LEAVE @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 16.
    Editing Wikipedia isStressful @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 17.
    Raul’s Fifth Lawof Wikipedia • “Over time, contentious articles will grow from edit-war inspiring to eventually reach a compromise that is agreed upon by all the editors who have ot departed in exasperation. This equilibrium will inevitably be disturbed by new users who accuse the article of being absurdly one sided and who attempt to rewrite the entire article. This is the cyclical nature of controversial articles." @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 18.
    The Vanishing @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 19.
    The... Downshifting? @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 20.
    Goodbye, Cruel World @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Sometimes You Don’tEven Get This @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 23.
    Gone, But NotForgotten @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 24.
    What Does ItMean for Participation? • Administrator activity Sept. ‘07—Mar. ‘09 Source: User:MBisanz @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 25.
    What Does ItMean for Participation? • Number of hours between 5 million edits Source: User:MBisanz @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 26.
    Three Types of(Productive) Editors • Original Authors of New Content • Organizers of Existing Content • Outside Interests Exerting Influence @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 27.
    Bad Influence • Rep.Dave Albo wouldn’t take “no” for an answer @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 28.
    Positive Influence • Articlecreated by campaign voluneer with disclosure & understanding of the rules @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 29.
    Let’s Get Prescriptivist •Recognition that volunteer “spirit” of Wikipedia is not the only model • Assistance / engagement of expert groups, even ones with potential Conflict of Interest @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 30.
    Let’s Get Prescriptivist •Informal education — More FAQs, 101s, etc. • Partipation by educators — WP involved in classroom assignments, not avoided • @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
  • 31.
    Thanks For Listening! •See this again at: http://slideshare.net/williambeutler • Wikipedia: User:WWB + User:NMS_Bill • Twitter: @williambeutler • @thewikipedian • The Wikipedian: http://thewikipedian.net • Blog P.I.: http://blogpi.net • E-mail: williambeutler@gmail.com @williambeutler • @thewikipedian