Space Elevators involve lowering a tether from synchronous orbit down to the surface of a planet, then electromechanically hauling payload up the tether to space. While theoretically possible, the concept has been shown to be infeasible on Earth until the development of mass-produced ultra-lightweight materials with specific tensile strengths of ~40 MPa/kg/m^3 (~20 times stronger than Kevlar). Such strength is within the theoretical limits of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), but it is not known when practical commercially available CNTs will reach this required strength. On Mars, however, the lower surface gravity and lower synchronous orbit altitude allow a space elevator to be built from materials with specific strengths of only ~5 MPa/kg/m^3, which is within the range of existing CNTs, provided such materials could be mass produced. The required tether mass and length is also significantly reduced from 9,000 tonnes and 155,000 km at Earth to only 1,500 tonnes and 70,000 km at Mars. The driving engineering limits for construction of a space elevator will be compared between Earth and Mars, and an industrial/economic analysis will be presented to quantify the project scale, timeline, cost, and expected economic activity Mars will likely have to support before a Martian space elevator would become a profitable investment.
Presented at the 2018 Mars Society Conference in Pasadena California.
Why the solar system's first space elevator will likely be martianMax Fagin
Space Elevators involve lowering a tether down from orbit to the surface of a planet, then electromechanically hauling payload up the tether to space. While the concept is theoretically sound, it has been shown to be infeasible on Earth until the development of mass-produced ultra-lightweight materials with specific tensile strengths in the range of ~40 MPa/kg/m3 (~20 times stronger than Kevlar). Such strength is within the theoretical limits of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), but it is not known when (if ever) practical commercially available CNTs will reach this required strength. On Mars however, the lower surface gravity and lower synchronous orbit altitude allow a space elevator to be built from materials with specific strengths of only ~5 MPa/kg/m^3, which is within the range of existing CNTs, provided such materials could be mass-produced. The required tether mass and length is also significantly reduced from 9,000 tonnes and 155,000 km at Earth to only 1,500 tonnes and 70,000 km at Mars. This presentation reviews the driving engineering limits for the construction of a space elevator, and make a comparison between the construction requirements of building one on Earth and on Mars. An industrial/economic analysis is also presented to quantify the project scale, timeline, cost, and expected economic activity Mars will likely have to support before a Martian space elevator would become a profitable investment.
Are solar sails the future of space exploration?
-History
-Principle
-Theory
-Design
-Materials
-Deployment
-Packaging
-Spinning Deployment
-Mission and Trajectory
-Electric Sail
-Limitations
The slides give a glimpse of the new upcoming technology that is ready to change the definition of space travel. More economically efficient and less risky approach that does not put space travellers life at stake........
Space elevator- a stage for cheap space exploration and tourismMOHAMMED FAZIL
It is the latest technology in the field of Aerospace industry. It consist of a platform from where rockets or space shuttles can be launched from the stratosphere , bringing surplus economy reduction in space exploration programmes. It thus satisfies the concept of cheap space tourism.
Why the solar system's first space elevator will likely be martianMax Fagin
Space Elevators involve lowering a tether down from orbit to the surface of a planet, then electromechanically hauling payload up the tether to space. While the concept is theoretically sound, it has been shown to be infeasible on Earth until the development of mass-produced ultra-lightweight materials with specific tensile strengths in the range of ~40 MPa/kg/m3 (~20 times stronger than Kevlar). Such strength is within the theoretical limits of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), but it is not known when (if ever) practical commercially available CNTs will reach this required strength. On Mars however, the lower surface gravity and lower synchronous orbit altitude allow a space elevator to be built from materials with specific strengths of only ~5 MPa/kg/m^3, which is within the range of existing CNTs, provided such materials could be mass-produced. The required tether mass and length is also significantly reduced from 9,000 tonnes and 155,000 km at Earth to only 1,500 tonnes and 70,000 km at Mars. This presentation reviews the driving engineering limits for the construction of a space elevator, and make a comparison between the construction requirements of building one on Earth and on Mars. An industrial/economic analysis is also presented to quantify the project scale, timeline, cost, and expected economic activity Mars will likely have to support before a Martian space elevator would become a profitable investment.
Are solar sails the future of space exploration?
-History
-Principle
-Theory
-Design
-Materials
-Deployment
-Packaging
-Spinning Deployment
-Mission and Trajectory
-Electric Sail
-Limitations
The slides give a glimpse of the new upcoming technology that is ready to change the definition of space travel. More economically efficient and less risky approach that does not put space travellers life at stake........
Space elevator- a stage for cheap space exploration and tourismMOHAMMED FAZIL
It is the latest technology in the field of Aerospace industry. It consist of a platform from where rockets or space shuttles can be launched from the stratosphere , bringing surplus economy reduction in space exploration programmes. It thus satisfies the concept of cheap space tourism.
all points choose is perfect . read for knowledge and what will be future if we have space elevator in real because this is science friction concept which really possible by discover carbon nano tube and now what is carbon nano tube read it in report thank you
This presentation gives a brief concept (engineering related) about solar space propulsion. It is all about the travelling technology of satellite in the space world. Hope it helps !
Space transportation system .
The space elevator was first proposed in the 1960’s as a method of getting into space. The initial studies of a space elevator outlined the basic concept of a cable strung between Earth and space but concluded that no materials available at the time had the required properties to feasibly construct such a cable. With the discovery of carbon nano tubes in 1991 it is now possible to realistically discuss the construction of a space elevator. Although currently produced only in small quantities, carbon nano tubes appear to have the strength to mass ratio required for this effort. However, fabrication of the cable required is only one of the challenges in construction of a space elevator. Powering the climbers, surviving micro meteor impacts, lightning strikes and low-Earth-orbit debris collisions are some of the problems that are now as important to consider as the production of the carbon nanotube cable. We consider various aspects of a space elevator and find each of the problems that these efforts will encounter can be solved with current or near-future technology.
retrieving the dead or soon to be terminated satellites from its orbit by providing a specially made carbon fiber heat shield which will be preinstalled the satellites
all points choose is perfect . read for knowledge and what will be future if we have space elevator in real because this is science friction concept which really possible by discover carbon nano tube and now what is carbon nano tube read it in report thank you
This presentation gives a brief concept (engineering related) about solar space propulsion. It is all about the travelling technology of satellite in the space world. Hope it helps !
Space transportation system .
The space elevator was first proposed in the 1960’s as a method of getting into space. The initial studies of a space elevator outlined the basic concept of a cable strung between Earth and space but concluded that no materials available at the time had the required properties to feasibly construct such a cable. With the discovery of carbon nano tubes in 1991 it is now possible to realistically discuss the construction of a space elevator. Although currently produced only in small quantities, carbon nano tubes appear to have the strength to mass ratio required for this effort. However, fabrication of the cable required is only one of the challenges in construction of a space elevator. Powering the climbers, surviving micro meteor impacts, lightning strikes and low-Earth-orbit debris collisions are some of the problems that are now as important to consider as the production of the carbon nanotube cable. We consider various aspects of a space elevator and find each of the problems that these efforts will encounter can be solved with current or near-future technology.
retrieving the dead or soon to be terminated satellites from its orbit by providing a specially made carbon fiber heat shield which will be preinstalled the satellites
This is the presentation given at the end of the Space studies program at NASA Ames, August 2009. The ACCESS Mars project stands for Assessing Cave Capabilities and Evaluating Specific Solutions (ACCESS) Mars explores the future of robotic and human exploration missions to Mars via subsurface habitation.
Mission statement: "...to develop a mission architecture for an initial settlement on Mars by assessing the feasibility of cave habitation as an alternative to proposed surface-based solutions".
Introduction to Satellite Power Station, Need for SPS, Basic Components of SPS and their description, Challenges, Present Status and future expectation.
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxR&R Consult
CFD analysis is incredibly effective at solving mysteries and improving the performance of complex systems!
Here's a great example: At a large natural gas-fired power plant, where they use waste heat to generate steam and energy, they were puzzled that their boiler wasn't producing as much steam as expected.
R&R and Tetra Engineering Group Inc. were asked to solve the issue with reduced steam production.
An inspection had shown that a significant amount of hot flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes, where the heat was supposed to be transferred.
R&R Consult conducted a CFD analysis, which revealed that 6.3% of the flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes without transferring heat. The analysis also showed that the flue gas was instead being directed along the sides of the boiler and between the modules that were supposed to capture the heat. This was the cause of the reduced performance.
Based on our results, Tetra Engineering installed covering plates to reduce the bypass flow. This improved the boiler's performance and increased electricity production.
It is always satisfying when we can help solve complex challenges like this. Do your systems also need a check-up or optimization? Give us a call!
Work done in cooperation with James Malloy and David Moelling from Tetra Engineering.
More examples of our work https://www.r-r-consult.dk/en/cases-en/
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Why The Solar System's First Space Elevator Will Likely be Martian
1. Why the Solar System’s First
Space Elevator Will Likely be
Martian
Max Fagin
Made In Space, Inc.
NASA Ames Research Center
Image credit: Erik Wernquist, “Wanderers”
2. Space Elevator Basics
Concept
Space Elevators can be as efficient as a motor + solar array:
30-60% efficient
~$5 of electricity per kg
By contrast…
Rockets can only be as efficient as an explosion:
<0.1% efficient
~$15,000 of rockets per kg
Synchronous Orbit
Low Orbit
To other planets, asteroid etc.
Need ~55 MJ per kg to Escape Earth
3. Space Elevator Basics
History
1960: Concept formalized by Yuri Artsutanov as “Electric
Railroad to the Stars” but no known materials had sufficient
strength.
…but no one really knows.
1970-80’s: Carbon Nano Tubes (CNTs) first characterized as
theoretically capable of reaching the required strength.
Today: Millimeter scale CNTs of the required strength
are regularly grown in labs, but we have no idea how to
scale up production to industrial levels (1k-10k tonnes,
~10,000 km).
2035-2065: Predicted range when CNT experts say we will
have solved the problem…
1865: Idea proposed by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky
Image Credit: Roger Gilbertson
4. Space Elevator Basics
Elements
Apex Station
- Scrapyard
- Interplanetary Transport
Anchor Station
Synchronous Station
- Sat deployment and recovery
Climbers
- Lifting Capacity
- Tether Maintenance
- Tether Dynamics Control
Tether
5. Space Elevator Basics
To be self supporting, the tether must be able to survive gravity (~r -2) and centrifugal force (~r)
Tether must bulge in the middle and tapper at the ends.
Thether Thickness = A(r) ∝ exp
𝜌
σy
GM
1
R
+
4π2
GMT2 R −
r2
2
−
1
r
Tether Material Properties Planet Properties
𝜌 = Density M = Mass
σy = Yield Stress R = Radius
T = Length of Day
r
AsyncAsurf
Cross Sectional Area at Synchronous Altitude
Cross Sectional Area at Surface
“Taper Ratio” = τ =
Async
Asurf
=
Tether
6. Space Elevator Basics
Taper Ratio is determined by material:
Strength per density = Pa/(kg/m3) = “Yuri” = (m/s)2
Steel: 0.1 MYuri, Taper ~10200
Kevlar: 2 MYuri, Taper ~108
CNT: 30 MYuri, Taper ~5
Tether
7. Space Elevator Basics
Tether
Taper Ratio =
Async
Asurf
= exp
𝜌
σy
GM
R
1 − R
GMT2
4π2
−
1
3
2
+ 1 +
R
2
GMT2
4π2
−
1
3
Tether Material Properties Planet Properties
𝜌 = Density M = Mass
σy = Yield Stress R = Radius
T = Length of Day
r
AsyncAsurf
Taper Ratio ∝
exp Planet Radius
exp Planet Mass1/3
exp Day Length−4/3
It is currentally 250 times easier to build a space elevator on Mars than on Earth
10. Mars vs. Earth
Construction Requirements
Assuming tether is to be manufactured:
- In synchronous orbit
- Using a carbon rich (C-type) asteroid as feedstock
- Density 2700 kg/m3
- 3% Carbon Content
- 80% Process Yield
- Present day cutting edge CNT bundle strength (~7 MYuri) and manufacturing rates
- 5000 CNT reactors working at 1.0 kg/month/reactor (2019 Industry expert prediction by 2019)
Mars Earth
Tether Mass 4,000 tonnes 13,000,000 tonnes
Tether Length 69,000 km 151,000 km
Required Asteroid Mass 170,000 tonnes 540,000,000 tonnes
Required Asteroid Diameter 50 m 725 m
Manufacturing Time 35 years 210,000 years
*Industry expert prediction of achievable by end of 2018
11. Mars vs. Earth
Terrestrial Concerns
On Earth, base station, climbers and tether must survive:
- Hurricanes
- Wind shear
- Lightning strikes
- Atomic oxygen in the ionosphere
- Induced ionospheric currents (CNTs are conductive)
- NIMBYs
On Mars, none of these problems apply.
Tethers and climbers can be optimized
for one environment (space).
Equator
Image Credit: ISEC
12. Potential Issues
Power Availability
Climbers will probably use solar power to ascend the tether.
1370 W/m2 of solar power available on Earth, only 590 W/m2 at Mars (57% reduction)
57% irradiance reduction at Mars, but also 62% reduction in gravity.
A climber designed for Earth would be +14% faster on Mars.
Image Credit: ISEC
14. Potential Issues
Phobos Properties
Size 27 x 22 x 18 km
Mass 1013 tonnes
Altitude 5820-6100 km
Inclination ~1.0˚
Period 7.6 hrs
Relative Velocity 1,470 m/s
~Mach 4!
What about Phobos?
Solution:
“The Twang”
a.k.a. “The Clarke Oscillation”
Fly-by every 0.31 sols
Close pass every ~4 sols
Collision inevitable every ~14 sols.
15. Potential IssuesWhat about Phobos?
Phobos
(To Scale)
100 km Tether
Keep Out Cylinder
Phobos / Space Elevator Impact Risks
Jan 01 - Feb 28, 2030
Equator
Phobos orbital tracks
(60 sols)
Close pass every ~4 sols. Collision is inevitable every ~14 sols.
16. Potential IssuesWhat about Phobos?
5820
5840
5860
5880
5900
5920
5940
5960
5980
6000
6020
6040
6060
6080
6100
6120
6140
6160
6180
6200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
TetherAltitude(km)
Phobos Centroid Distance from Tether (km)
Phobos / Space Elevator Impact Risks
Jan 01 - Feb 28, 2030
Collision
Flyby
Closepass
Phobos
(To Scale)
Close Approaches
Collisions can be avoided provided one climber every ~14 sols is devoted to collision avoidance
18. What if it falls down?
It almost certainly won’t. But IF it did…
19. Summary
Image credit: Erik Wernquist, “Wanderers”
- Space Elevator construction is 250-to-30 times easier on Mars than on Earth
- Construction only requires space infrastructure (minimal planet support)
- Not clear at present when (if ever) CNTs will reach the required strength for
building a space elevator for Earth (Maybe start in 2060?)
- CNT industry is already at the point where it could construct enough CNTs
for a Martian elevator in ~35 years even with zero further improvements.
- So which will happen first? Mars export economy or Earth rated CNTs?
Questions?
21. Backup Slides: CNT’s
CNT’s have been made that satisfy specific strength requirements.
So what’s the hold up?
Requires 2000 tonnes of defect free CNTs.
Would take ~20,000 years to grow
Strong?
Large Amounts? Fast?
Pick One
Name. Former affiliations (NASA, SpaceX, Purdue), Current affiliation (Made In Space). Background is Mars Entry Descent and Landing
Not a building going up. A tether going out.
Center of mass MUST remain in synchronous orbit altitude
At current CNT manufacturing rate, 4000 mT vs 1,000,000
Originally proposed as a solution by Arthur C. Clarke in his 1979 book “Fountains of Paradise”
We manage the National Air Traffic Control System on a scale of 5-10 seconds. This is a matter of physics, predictable on the level of meters and milliseconds if desired.
We manage the National Air Traffic Control System on a scale of 5-10 seconds. This is a matter of physics, predictable on the level of meters and milliseconds if desired.