Rezultatele studiului despre utilizatorii celor mai cunoscute retele sociale in Romania, realizat de Daedalus Millward Brown si prezentat la Webstock 2010.
Transformarile si provocarile PR-ului romanescevensys
Studiul surprinde diferentele de perceptii pe care la au agentiile si clientii de PR in anul 2013 fata de statusul actual al pietei de relatii publice. Studiul este realizat de Unlock Market Reserch in colaborare cu Evensys.
Transformarile si provocarile PR-ului romanescevensys
Studiul surprinde diferentele de perceptii pe care la au agentiile si clientii de PR in anul 2013 fata de statusul actual al pietei de relatii publice. Studiul este realizat de Unlock Market Reserch in colaborare cu Evensys.
Rezultatele unui sondaj online realizat printre practicieni in social media. La chestionar au raspuns peste 170 de persoane.
Studiul a fost prezentat in premiera la Webstock 2011
Director Lee Rainie gave a keynote at the NFAIS annual conference about the way the internet and mobile connectivity have transformed the worlds of networked individuals. He discussed how normal life has changed in the past decade because of three revolutions in technology: 1) the spread of broadband; 2) the rise of mobile connectivity; and 3) the emergence of technological social networks. He will discuss trends and likely future developments in technology that will shape the way people learn, share, and create information.
Learn more about Automotive Digital Marketing at the most popular professional network for car dealers and interactive marketers working in the auto industry at http://www.automotivedigitalmarketing.com/
Social Media aroud the World in One Day at STIMA Trends NightInSites on Stage
Social Media around the World in One Day by Hakim Zemni (Managing Director InSites Consulting Belgium), presented at the STIMA Trends Night on February 21, 2013 in Belgium.
Succeeding with Social Media (CASE SMC 12)Michael Stoner
This is the handout of a presentation that Bill Hayward (Slover Linett Strategies) and Michael Stoner did at the CASE Social Media and Community Conference in Chicago, IL, in April 2012. We report on findings from the 2012 CASE/mStoner/Slover Linett Survey of Social Media in Advancement.
Rezultatele unui sondaj online realizat printre practicieni in social media. La chestionar au raspuns peste 170 de persoane.
Studiul a fost prezentat in premiera la Webstock 2011
Director Lee Rainie gave a keynote at the NFAIS annual conference about the way the internet and mobile connectivity have transformed the worlds of networked individuals. He discussed how normal life has changed in the past decade because of three revolutions in technology: 1) the spread of broadband; 2) the rise of mobile connectivity; and 3) the emergence of technological social networks. He will discuss trends and likely future developments in technology that will shape the way people learn, share, and create information.
Learn more about Automotive Digital Marketing at the most popular professional network for car dealers and interactive marketers working in the auto industry at http://www.automotivedigitalmarketing.com/
Social Media aroud the World in One Day at STIMA Trends NightInSites on Stage
Social Media around the World in One Day by Hakim Zemni (Managing Director InSites Consulting Belgium), presented at the STIMA Trends Night on February 21, 2013 in Belgium.
Succeeding with Social Media (CASE SMC 12)Michael Stoner
This is the handout of a presentation that Bill Hayward (Slover Linett Strategies) and Michael Stoner did at the CASE Social Media and Community Conference in Chicago, IL, in April 2012. We report on findings from the 2012 CASE/mStoner/Slover Linett Survey of Social Media in Advancement.
This is a presentation held at the Web Based Community conference 2007 on the communication tools that are used within FLOSS communities.
Admittedly it neglects the aspect of mailing lists. A reason for this is that it focuses on the communities at large, and not on the narrower core team.
The increased usage of mobile devices and the rise of social networking have made personal technology a more integral part of people's lives than ever before. This study looked to uncover any issues and concerns that people have with the increasing pervasiveness of technology in their lives, particularly around security, privacy, and heath/safety.
Some of the key findings from this study are:
- People still do not trust mobile technology enough to feel comfortable making online purchases/transactions, preferring instead to use their computers
- While people have concerns about their online privacy, it has little impact on their actual mobile technology usage
- Concerns over the usage of mobile technology and personal health have little impact on people's mobile device usage, in fact, many people are skeptical over claims that mobile technology may pose a health risk
Portland Communications summary of the major digital trends as we see them - mobility, sociability, discovery, connectivity, big data and screens. For more information contact mark.flanagan@portland-communications.com
Understanding the new paradigm: How to incorporate mobile research into our i...Merlien Institute
Presented by Melissa Gil, Director, Customer Intelligence, SingTel
& Bruce Wells, Managing Director and President, Asia, Vision Critical
at Market Research in the Mobile World Asia-Pacific
30-31 January 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
This event is proudly organised by Merlien Institute
Check out our upcoming events by visiting http://www.mrmw.net
Snapchat in Romania - cine sunt utilizatorii si care sunt obiceiurile acestora de consum? Un studiu realizat de iSense Solutions si prezentat in premiera la cea de-a noua editie Webstock, pe 30 septembrie 2016.
Romanian Travelers - The Online Perspectiveevensys
Daedalus Millward Brown a realizat pentru evenimentul eTravel Conference (15 octombrie 2014) in exclusivitate un studiu care prezinta tipurile de servicii turistice achizitionate de romani din mediul online, importanta avantajelor online-ului atunci cand vorbim despre achizitia de pachete turistice, precum si increderea romanilor in achizitiile turistice online. De asemenea, sunt identificate motivele pentru care turistii nu apeleaza intr-o mai mare masura la mediul online si elementele ce ar trebui imbunatatite de providerii de servicii turistice online astfel incat sa atraga mai multi consumatori.
Cum cumpara romanii servicii turistice onlineevensys
Primul studiu public despre obiceiurile de cumparare a pachetelor turistice in mediul online, prezentat de Daedalus Millward Brown la eTravel Conference 2013 (www.etravel conference.ro)
Cea de-a sasea editie a topului celor mai populare branduri in mediul online romanesc, prezentat in exclusivitate la Digital Marketing Forum 2013 (www.digitalforum.ro)
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Le nuove frontiere dell'AI nell'RPA con UiPath Autopilot™UiPathCommunity
In questo evento online gratuito, organizzato dalla Community Italiana di UiPath, potrai esplorare le nuove funzionalità di Autopilot, il tool che integra l'Intelligenza Artificiale nei processi di sviluppo e utilizzo delle Automazioni.
📕 Vedremo insieme alcuni esempi dell'utilizzo di Autopilot in diversi tool della Suite UiPath:
Autopilot per Studio Web
Autopilot per Studio
Autopilot per Apps
Clipboard AI
GenAI applicata alla Document Understanding
👨🏫👨💻 Speakers:
Stefano Negro, UiPath MVPx3, RPA Tech Lead @ BSP Consultant
Flavio Martinelli, UiPath MVP 2023, Technical Account Manager @UiPath
Andrei Tasca, RPA Solutions Team Lead @NTT Data
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Enhancing Performance with Globus and the Science DMZGlobus
ESnet has led the way in helping national facilities—and many other institutions in the research community—configure Science DMZs and troubleshoot network issues to maximize data transfer performance. In this talk we will present a summary of approaches and tips for getting the most out of your network infrastructure using Globus Connect Server.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
The Metaverse and AI: how can decision-makers harness the Metaverse for their...Jen Stirrup
The Metaverse is popularized in science fiction, and now it is becoming closer to being a part of our daily lives through the use of social media and shopping companies. How can businesses survive in a world where Artificial Intelligence is becoming the present as well as the future of technology, and how does the Metaverse fit into business strategy when futurist ideas are developing into reality at accelerated rates? How do we do this when our data isn't up to scratch? How can we move towards success with our data so we are set up for the Metaverse when it arrives?
How can you help your company evolve, adapt, and succeed using Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse to stay ahead of the competition? What are the potential issues, complications, and benefits that these technologies could bring to us and our organizations? In this session, Jen Stirrup will explain how to start thinking about these technologies as an organisation.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Who's getting social in Romania
1. Who’s getting social?
A quantitative survey on Romanian users of online social networks
Date: September, 2010
2. 2
Methodology
Research method
Quantitative survey
Target population
Men and women, aged 15-55, from urban cities larger than 50,000 inhabitants, users of online social
networks
Data collection technique
Computer assisted web interviews, using a semi-structured interview
Invitations were sent randomly to Daedalus New Media Research panel
Sample size
528 interviews
Fieldwork
Data collection was performed between 13 and 26 August
4. Key points 4
• On average, Romanian users of Social Networks have opened
accounts on 4 networks, and currently they are using about 3
of them;
• In a month, they connect to a Social Network on 13 days, and
they spend 1 hour and 19 minutes for a session, on average;
• The average number of contacts we can expect in a Romanian
user’s list, is 99, significantly more on HI5 and Facebook, and
less on the rest;
• Less than 2 in 10 users say they have their access to their
accounts restricted, at work or at school;
5. 5
Awareness of the online social networks
Subgroups with significant differences
compared to the whole sample
%
97.0 Less aware those over 45 y.o.
94.7 Less aware those over 45 y.o.
More aware those aged 25-34 and with high education, less aware
82.0
those with low & medium education
75.0 More aware are the young people (18-24 y.o.) and less aware
those aged 35 and above
69.3
59.7 More aware people aged 18-24 y.o. and less those over 45 y.o.
38.3 More aware those aged 25-34 and with high education, less aware
those with low & medium education and people over 45 y.o.
6.1 Those with low or medium education are more aware
Others 12.7
Base=All sample
Q2. Which of the following social networks sites do you know, even if you have never used them ?
6. 6
Usage of the Social Networks >>
Currently Used Most
Ever Used
Used Often
% % %
85.2 78.4 66.9
81.4 55.5 16.1
59.5 27.1 5.2
42.8 21.4 3.8
24.8 18.9 3.0
22.2 11.4 1.1
14.8 6.8 0.7
2.5 1.1 0.2
Others 10.4 7.6 3.0
Base=All sample Base=All sample Base=All sample
Q3. On which one of the following social network sites have you ever had an account/profile? Please tick all, even if you no longer use that
site. / Q4. Which of these sites do you currently use?/ Q6.Which is the social network that you use most often/ you spend the most time?
7. 7
Usage of the Social Networks >>
Currently
Ever Used Delta*
Used
% %
85.2 78.4 31.3
Higher than average power
in growing user base
81.4 55.5 7.5
59.5 27.1 -15.2
Lower power than average
in growing user base
42.8 21.4 -10.7
24.8
Higher than average power
18.9 15.5
in growing user base
22.2 11.4 -9.4
14.8 6.8 -14.8 Lower power than average
in growing user base
2.5 1.1 -16.7
Base=All sample
Base=All sample Base=All sample
Q4. Which of these sites do you currently use?
* Difference between network conversion ratio from trial
to usage and the market average ratio
8. 8
>> Usage of the Social Networks
REPERTOIRE STAR
1
BestJobs Facebook
Hi5
Others
0.8
Neogen
LinkedIn
Netlog
0.6
Trial
TPU (Toti Pentru Unu)
0.4
Twitter
Myspace
0.2
0
DEVELOPING NICHE
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Loyalty
Q2. Which of the following social networks sites do you know, even if you have never used them ?/ Q3. Which of the following social
networks sites do you know, even if you have never used them ?/ Q4. Which of these sites do you currently use?/ Q6. Which is the social
network that you use most often/ you spend the most time?
9. Reasons for not using Social 9
Networks anymore»
Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=36
The lack of time 33.3
I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 13.9
The personal data security/spamming 11.1
It's useless/waste of time 5.6
I have a profile, but never used it 5.6
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 2.8
I forgot about it/lost the password 2.8 Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=113
I get too many requests from unknown people 2.8
I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 29.2
Complicated to use 2.8
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 17.7
The lack of time 15.9
Another social networking is better 9.7
Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=137
I don't need it anymore 6.2
I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 23.4
I don't like the members of this social network 3.5
It's for teenagers 12.4
The interface 2.7
Another social networking is better 10.9
The lack of time 9.5 I have a profile, but never used it 2.7
The personal data security/spamming 8.8 Limited services/ options 2.7
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 8.0
I don't like the members of this social network 5.8
No particular reason 4.4
I don't need it anymore 3.6
It's useless/waste of time 2.9
*Respondents who don’t use anymore a certain social network
Q5. What are the reasons for which you don’t use it anymore... ?
10. » Reasons for not using Social 10
Networks anymore
Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=57
I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 19.3
The lack of time 19.3
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 12.3
Another social networking is better 8.8
Complicated to use 7.0
I have too many accounts 7.0
I don't need it anymore 5.3
Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=171
The interface 3.5
I have a profile, but never used it 3.5 I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 26.3
No particular reason 3.5 The lack of time 16.4
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 8.2
I don't need it anymore 6.4
Reasons for not using anymore social networks N*=31 Another social networking is better 5.3
No particular reason 4.1
I don't need it anymore 12.9
I am not looking for a job 3.5
I lost my interest/ I don't like anymore/ I got bored 9.7
I forgot about it/lost the password 2.9
The lack of time 9.7
No particular reason 9.7 I don't like the members of this social network 2.9
Most of my friends are/switched to another social network 6.5 Limited services/ options 2.9
Complicated to use 6.5
I have a profile, but never used it 6.5
Another social networking is better 3.2
I am not looking for a job 3.2
I forgot about it/lost the password 3.2
The interface 3.2
I have too many accounts 3.2
*Respondents who don’t use anymore a certain social network
Q5. What are the reasons for which you don’t use it anymore... ?
11. 11
Facebook’s Usage Interactions
Facebook and HI5 Facebook and LinkedIn
Percentage of
current Facebook
users that are using
22% LinkedIn as well
55%
78% 56% 78% 19%
Percentage currently Percentage currently
using Facebook using LinkedIn
Facebook and Neogen Facebook and Netlog Facebook and Twitter
26% 21% 14%
78% 11%
78% 27% 78%
21%
Base=All using currently the network
12. 12
HI5’s Usage Interactions
HI5 and Facebook HI5 and LinkedIn
Percentage of
current HI5 users
that are using
LinkedIn as well
78% 16%
55% 78% 55% 19%
Percentage currently
Percentage currently using LinkedIn
using HI5
HI5 and Neogen HI5 and Netlog HI5 and Twitter
33% 31% 11%
27% 55% 21% 55% 11%
55%
Base=All using currently the network
13. Usage Interactions on the Social 13
Networks
TPU (Toti
Facebook Hi5 LinkedIn Myspace Neogen Netlog Pentru Twitter
Unu)
Facebook 78 90 89 75 75 83 95
Hi5 55 46 67 68 75 67 55
LinkedIn 22 16 31 22 14 33 40
Myspace 8 8 11 9 13 17 22
It reads: 55% of
current
Neogen 26 33 32
Facebook users 36 52 50 30
are using HI5
too;
Netlog 21 29 16 42 41 50 25
TPU (Toti
Pentru 1 1 2 3 2 3 3
Unu)
Twitter 14 11 24 36 13 13 33
Base=All sample
14. 14
Time spent on the social networks
Number Average
of days in
a month N=528 N*=414 N*= 293 N*= 113 N*= 60 N*= 143 N*=100
Mean** 13 20 10 8 12 9 7
Number
Average
of hours
at a
N=528 N*=414 N*= 293 N*= 113 N*= 60 N*= 143 N*=100
session
Mean** 1h19min 1h 54min 1h 3min 1h 3min 1h 4min 1h 21min 31min
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
** Number of days connected in a month/hour connected for a session
Q7. On how many days, out of the last 30 days, you have logged in on ...
15. 15
Average Number of Contacts
Number Average
of
contacts N=528 N*=414 N*= 293 N*= 113 N*= 60 N*= 143 N*=100
Mean** 99 117 242 44 64 34 42
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
** Number of contacts
Q9. What is, approximately, the number of friends or contacts that you have in your...
16. 16
Banned Access to Social Networks
%
12.1
8.9
4.4
4.0
1.5
1.5
0.9
0.2
Others 0.8
None 83.9
Base=All sample
Q10. Some companies, schools, high school, universities or libraries do not allow the access to these networks, so that the employees,
pupils, students or readers cannot use them during the working hours. Which of the networks you use is banned to your job, school or
library.
18. Key Points 18
• 23% of connections users make on Social Networks are from a
mobile phone, while the rest are made from a desktop or laptop;
• There are twice as many respondents who watch frequently
other people’s photos, than those who frequently upload their own
pictures on the Social Networks;
• Only 2 in 10 Romanian Social Network users frequently support a
social cause, while 3 in 10 have never supported one;
• A third of the Social Network users in Romania are frequently
looking for jobs on the Social Network websites;
19. Key Points (contd.) 19
• The vast majority of the Social Networks users are accepting
invitations only from people they know, and only 11% of them
welcome anybody that is asking for their friendship;
• Only 14% of the Social Network users are active users, having
most of their contact list built up by sending invitations;
• There are significantly more users connected with celebrities or
public figures on Facebook and Twitter;
• Facebook and Hi5 seem to share the same strategic
territory in terms of activities done on Social Networks, explaining as
well the high overlap between them.
20. How do Romanians connect on 20
their Social Networks
Connection Type
…while the rest…
% Connection Place %
From home 97.7 On the road 19.7
From work 48.5
From home 13.8
From hotspots Wi-Fi 14.2
From hotspots Wi-Fi 11.2
From School/university 9.3
From work 8.7
From an Internet cafe 4.5
From library 2.7 From School/university
4.7
Q11. Which one of the following statements best describes the way you usually log in, to the social networks you use?
21. 21
Are the Social Networks Connected?
Total
N=439
% N*=369 N*=276 N*=111 N*=60 N*=141 N*=98
% % % % % %
I don't have them linked
64.0 61.7
72.7 72.4 70.7 71.6 72.4
I have them linked
11.7
11.2 12.2 10.5 28.3 11.3
16.3
Don't know 24.3
16.2 15.4 18.8 17.0
10.0 11.2
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
Q12. Do you have linked your social networks accounts? Meaning that you can post information/ write on one site (ex. Facebook) but the
information will appear on many pages (ex. Twitter, and MySpace in the same time).
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
22. Most Frequent Activities on 22
Social Networks »
Total
N=528 N*=113
N*=414 N*=293
T2B**
T2B** T2B** T2B**
% % % %
Search for new things, to be informed 45.6 46.4 45.7 45.1
I watch other people's photos/ videos
41.3 44.4 46.4 36.3
Search for old friends, friends I lost
connection with 39.8 42.3 42.7 40.7
I read what other people write 37.7 39.6 34.5 31.9
I check certain person profile (what they
do, their level of education, etc.) 35.2 37.2 33.4 38.9
I watch if there any job offers 32.8 29.2 34.1 38.1
I update my profile/status
25.8 24.9 25.9 24.8
I play a network game online
24.4 25.8 28.7 26.5
I upload photos/ videos
21.6 24.2 23.9 23.0
Support a particular cause (social,
environmental relate, etc.) 19.1 20.8 19.1 22.1
I write comments on others page/wall,
person from my list 18.8 19.6 19.8 22.1
I recommend things those from the list 15.9 17.1 14.7 14.2
I send visual messages (emoticons, pokes,
winks, etc.) 14.4 13.8 15.4 23.9
Communicate with new people, people I
don't know 11.7 10.9 15.4 19.5
I send group messages 11.7 13.3 12.3 17.7
I schedule meetings (going out, at the
cinema, at concerts etc.) 7.0 6.5 8.9 9.7
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
**T2B = Frequent + Very Frequent
Q13. Please, select, which of the following activities you do on… [NETWORK FROM Q6] and how often do you do this. Use a scale from 1
to 6, where 1 means „Never” and 6 means „Very frequent”.
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
23. » Most Frequent Activities on 23
Social Networks
Total
N=528 N*=60 N*=143
T2B** N*=100
T2B** T2B** T2B**
% % % %
Search for new things, to be informed 45.6 60.0 52.4 43.0
I watch other people's photos/ videos
41.3 41.7 37.1 40.0
Search for old friends, friends I lost
connection with 39.8 38.3 43.4 42.0
I read what other people write 37.7 48.3 35.7 42.0
I check certain person profile (what they
do, their level of education, etc.) 35.2 43.3 41.3 53.0
I watch it there any job offers 32.8 28.3 51.7 31.0
I update my profile/status
25.8 30.0 28.7 24.0
I play a network game online
24.4 20.0 25.9 13.0
I upload photos/ videos
21.6 21.7 21.0 19.0
Support a particular cause (social,
environmental relate, etc.) 19.1 30.0 16.8 20.0
I write comments on others page/wall,
person from my list 18.8 21.7 17.5 19.0
I recommend things those from the list 15.9 31.7 14.0 21.0
I send visual messages (emoticons, pokes,
winks, etc.) 14.4 20.0 16.1 11.0
Communicate with new people, people I
don't know 11.7 21.7 16.8 10.0
I send group messages 11.7 30.0 13.3 17.0
I schedule meetings (going out, at the
cinema, at concerts etc.) 7.0 11.7 7.7 7.0
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
**T2B = Frequent + Very Frequent
Q13. Please, select, which of the following activities you do on… [NETWORK FROM Q6] and how often do you do this. Use a scale from 1
to 6, where 1 means „Never” and 6 means „Very frequent”.
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
24. Strategic Positioning Map 24
by current used social networks
Contacting/Direct
Communicate with new people, people I don't know
I send visual messages (emoticons, pokes, winks, etc.)
I schedule meetings
I send group messages
Netlog
Twitter I play a network game online
I write comments on others
Support a particular cause (social, environmental relate, etc.) page/wall, person from my list
Group Search for new things, to be informed I upload Individual
Hi5
photos/ videos
I recommend things to those from the list
Neogen
I update my
profile/status I watch if there are
any job offers
Facebook
I read what other people write I watch other
people's photos/ videos
Search for old friends,
friends I lost connection with
I check certain person profile
Linkedin
Searching/Indirect
25. 25
User type by the way connections were made
Active = more than 7 out of 10 contacts/friends acquired trough sent invitations;
Balanced = between 4 and 6 contacts/friends acquired trough sent invitations;
Passive = between 0 and 3 contacts/friends acquired trough sent invitations;
Total
N=528 N*=414 N*=293 N*=113 N*=60 N*=143 N*=100
%
% % % % % %
Active 14.0 15.2 12.3 15.0 16.7 13.3
18.0
47.0 46.4
48.1 47.8 55.2
50.0 49.0
Balanced
39.0 36.7 41.3 37.2
Passive 33.3 31.5 33.0
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
Q14. Please think at the last 10 people you connected with on [INSERT NETWORK USED]. How many connections have resulted from
invitations you have sent to the others, and how many have resulted from invitations you have received from other people?
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
26. 26
Invitations Acceptance
Total
N=528 N*=414 N*=293 N*=113 N*=60 N*=143 N*=100
% % % % % % %
I accept only certain
invitations, from 61.6 63.0 59.0 51.3 58.3 55.9 68.0
person I know
I accept certain
invitations, from
41.5 39.6 44.0 48.7 48.3 47.6 45.0
person I don't know,
but I check them
I accept all
invitations, from
anyone 11.0 12.1 11.9 15.9 13.3 12.6 6.0
*Respondents who currently use a certain social network
Q15. Please tell me which of the following is valid in your case, related to the invitations you usually receive on …
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
27. 27
Profile of the Contacts by Type »
Total
N=528 N*=113
N*=414 N*=293
% % % %
Very close friends 86.9 88.2 90.8 85.0
Friends 84.3 86.2 89.1 88.5
School or work colleagues 83.7 84.5 84.6 80.5
Relatives 66.1 68.6 71.7 64.6
People that I met online, but I
have never met face-to-face 50.2 49.8 53.6 58.4
People I've never met before
joining this site
38.6 40.1 44.0 51.3
Business partners 22.9 23.2 22.9 27.4
Stars/Celebrities/Public person 19.7 22.2 18.8 18.6
* Respondents who currently use a certain social network
Q16. Which of the following categories of people exists in your group of contacts you have on … [INSERT EACH NETWORK USED]?
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
28. 28
» Profile of the Contacts by Type
Total
N=528 N*=60 N*=143 N*=100
% % % %
Very close friends 86.9 85.0 81.1 81.0
Friends 84.3 83.3 76.9 73.0
School or work colleagues 83.7 75.0 81.1 89.0
Relatives 66.1 55.0 55.2 51.0
People that I met online, but I
have never met face-to-face 50.2 58.3 55.2 44.0
People I've never met before
joining this site
38.6 45.0 46.9 33.0
Business partners 22.9 26.7 29.4 47.0
Stars/Celebrities/Public
person 19.7 33.3 16.1 19.0
* Respondents who currently use a certain social network
Q16. Which of the following categories of people exists in your group of contacts you have on … [INSERT NETWORK USED]?
Significantly higher/lower towards Total (level of confidence 95%)
30. Social Network User Map (I) 30
by demographics, psychographics and Internet usage
1 use the Internet to read care significantly less for the way they look;
High newspapers/magazines,
Level it’s less important to be around the family,
0.98 to buy products or services,
or to keep tidy around them,
or to read/write on blogs
or to do things around the house,
0.96
or to go to the church
0.94 use the Internet to read newspapers/magazines
or to read/write on forums significantly more than
the average
0.92
Education Level
read
newspapers/magazines
0.9 or to read/write blogs
significantly more than like to have quality things,
the average
0.88 and to go to church to a significantly
higher extent than the average
are reading or writing on blogs are
0.86 significantly more than the average
social network users
0.84 using significantly more the Internet for
playing, like to have quality things,
for downloading music or movies, and to go to church to a significantly
0.82 higher extent than the average
and less for making purchases
Low &
Middle 0.8 are enjoying doing things around the
Level house significantly more than the
average social network users
0.78
28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 34.0 35.0 36.0 37.0
Younger Age (average years) Older
Bubble size represents the current users share
31. Social Network User Map (II) 31
by demographics, psychographics and Internet usage
2.15
Higher
2.1
2.05
2
Occupation Type
1.95
1.9
1.85
1.8
Lower
1.75
2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6
Lower Income Level Higher
Bubble size represents the current users share
32.
33. Thank you!
• This study was conducted by Daedalus Consulting and Daedalus
New Media Research and with the help of Cristian Manafu;
• For further information on the insights contained within this report and
the research that it is based on, you may contact:
Mădălin Vladu Tel.:+40213179731
Senior Client Service Fax:+40213180040
Email:madalin.vladu@daedalusmb.ro www.daedalusmb.ro