Welcome to the West Station
Reference Concept Design
Online Consultation
Please review the presentation and complete the survey.
February 19, 2013 to March 14, 2013
Online Consultation Overview

   February 19, 2013
    Provide a brief Crosstown update
    Update on the AFP Process
    Present The Crosstown station and stop design philosophy
    Provide latest details on locations of stations and stops
Crosstown Map
Overview


What is The Crosstown?
    Project $4.9B (2010$) funded by the Province of Ontario
    19 kilometres east-west Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kennedy to Mt. Dennis
     including a tunnelled central section
    New transit connections to Yonge, University-Spadina Subway, Scarborough RT
     and GO Stouffville line and future connection to GO Kitchener line
    Up to 26 stations
Overview


Where we are in the process
      Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) launch shaft approaching completion
      Soil testing is currently underway from Don Mills Road to Weston Road
      West tunnel contract awarded summer 2012
      Conceptual design and requirements identification
What’s next
      Utility relocation at station locations beginning with Keele Street in winter 2013
      Construction of TBM launch and extraction shafts at Eglinton West station
      TBMs arriving on site in spring 2013
      Tendering of project
New Approach:
Alternative Financing and Procurement (AFP)
Public-private partnership models have been underway in Canada for 20
years
    165 projects
    21 transportation projects
    $51 billion total project value
Canada-wide examples
    Canada Line rapid transit project (Vancouver)
    Autoroute 25 (Montréal)
    Trans-Canada Highway (Atlantic Canada)
Ontario examples
      Pan Am games athletes village
      Ottawa Light Rail Transit
      Highway 407 East Phase 1
      Rt. Hon. Herb Gray Parkway (formerly the Windsor-Essex Parkway)
Owner’s Role Changes with AFP
New Approach: Advantages of AFP

Increased capacity to bring projects to market

Transfer of risk
     Appropriate risks transferred to private sector to ensure “on time, on budget”
      delivery and offer value for money
     Design, construction, cost escalation, schedule delays, operations, maintenance,
      life cycle, financial risk


Cost certainty
     Optimal cost combination: combines capital, maintenance and life cycle costs
     Integration of design and construction
New Approach: Roles and Responsibilities in the Design
Build Finance Maintain Model
Metrolinx Role
                                            Finance
    Design
                                              • Project Budget
       • Overall scope (inclusion of
                                              • With Infrastructure Ontario run a
         maintenance, operations, etc.)
                                                competitive procurement process;
       • Project-Specific Output                select the winning contractor
         Specifications (with Consultant
         team)                              Maintain
       • Real Estate Acquisition (with        • Testing & Commissioning (with
         City of Toronto)                       Toronto Transit Commission)
                                              • Safety Certification and Project
    Build
                                                Acceptance
       • Oversee Construction Phase
       • Quality Assurance
                                            TTC to operate
                                              • Integrated with existing TTC
                                                system
Approach to new transit: Light Rail Transit
Approach to Station Design: Urban Design Principles
   Locate station entrances and vents to limit the amount of frontage impacted
   Explore opportunities to consolidate and locate above grade mechanical vent
    shafts where their impacts on adjacent development can be minimized
   Site station entrances and ventilation infrastructure with possible new development
    in mind
   Locate primary and secondary entrances so that they can help to contribute to the
    creation of a consistent building setback
   Minimize the impact of vents and other facilities through careful siting
Approach to Station Design: Architectural Principles
    Station and stop designs should reflect their civic
     role through high quality architecture and urban
     design.
    Logos, station names, and signage should be used
     boldly and consistently to reinforce station identity
    Signage and way finding shall be highly
     standardized
    Variation of treatments used to differentiate
     stations
    Stations can embrace the local context through
     design or art installations
    The Public Realm should be used as an
     opportunity to enhance user experience and
     integrate stations into their surroundings
Approach to Station Design: Safety and accessibility
    Elevators will be included in all stations
    Designated waiting areas will be included in all stations
    Stations will use standard elements to make them familiar to passengers with
     accessibility challenges
    Integrate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles into station
     design
    Light colours will be used to improve safety and efficiency
    Incorporate fully glazed station entrances to maximize light
Approach to Station Design: Public Realm Elements
Public Realm
      Implementation of streetscape, furniture, and tree planting standards
      Widen sidewalks within station area
      Stations entrances will be identified by a consistent pylon sign
      Some stations will include landscaped plazas which will:
         • Compliment the design of the station
         • Include pedestrian level lighting
         • Include trees, hard and soft landscaping
Approach to Station Design: Public Art


    Stations will feature public art
    Artwork will be integrated with
     architectural finishes or elements
     of the stations and plazas
    Surface stops may also include
     public art
Reference Concept Design
   Stations are shown as a Reference Concept Design (RCD)

   Reference concept designs, or functional designs, are used in the AFP model as
    inputs to the development of the Request for Proposal (RFP)

   The functional design is intended to identify the location of entrances, exits and
    ancillary station (ventilation) equipment

   Functional designs are not intended to provide architectural details for stations

   The AFP partner will be developing designs for the stations and these will be
    subject to public input
Keele Station
Local Context: Demand
Keele Station
Local Context: Land Use




  Legend
  Commercial use:
  Residential use:
  Institutional use:
Keele Station
Profile View
Keele Station
Plan View
Keele Station
Main Entrance
                North East Corner
Keele Station
Secondary Entrances


         South East Corner   North West Corner
Caledonia Station
Local Context: Demand
Caledonia Station
Local Context: Land Use




Legend
Commercial use:
Residential use:
Caledonia Station
Plan View
Caledonia Station
Profile View
Dufferin Station
Local Context: Demand




        Population Density within a 10 minute walk to Dufferin Station
Dufferin Station
Local Context: Land Use
Dufferin Station
Section through Platform
Dufferin Station
Plan View
Dufferin Station
Preliminary Station Concept
Dufferin Station
Primary Entrance
                   South East Corner
Dufferin Station
Secondary Entrance
                     North West Corner
Dufferin Station
Utility Buildings
                    South West Corner
Oakwood Station
Local Context: Demand
Oakwood Station
Local Context: Land Use
Oakwood Station
Profile View
Oakwood Station
Plan View
Oakwood Station
Preliminary Station Concept
Oakwood Station
Street View
                  North Side




                  South Side
Traction Power Substation
  Traction power substations (TPSS) provide
   system power to light rail vehicles
  For underground stations TPSS are
   integrated with stations buildings
  They are planned with an average spacing of
   1.5 km along surface sections and 2 km
   along underground sections
  Integrated with adjacent landscape
  Final locations still to be determined
     • Keele                      • Don Mills
     • Dufferin                   • Wynford
     • Bathurst                   • Jonesville
     • Yonge                      • Warden
     • Bayview
Contact Us

   Community Office: 1848 Eglinton Ave W.
   416-782-8118
   crosstown@metrolinx.com
   http://thecrosstown.ca
www.metrolinx.com



               Thank you

West Station Reference Concept Design Online Consultation

  • 1.
    Welcome to theWest Station Reference Concept Design Online Consultation Please review the presentation and complete the survey. February 19, 2013 to March 14, 2013
  • 2.
    Online Consultation Overview February 19, 2013  Provide a brief Crosstown update  Update on the AFP Process  Present The Crosstown station and stop design philosophy  Provide latest details on locations of stations and stops
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Overview What is TheCrosstown?  Project $4.9B (2010$) funded by the Province of Ontario  19 kilometres east-west Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kennedy to Mt. Dennis including a tunnelled central section  New transit connections to Yonge, University-Spadina Subway, Scarborough RT and GO Stouffville line and future connection to GO Kitchener line  Up to 26 stations
  • 5.
    Overview Where we arein the process  Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) launch shaft approaching completion  Soil testing is currently underway from Don Mills Road to Weston Road  West tunnel contract awarded summer 2012  Conceptual design and requirements identification What’s next  Utility relocation at station locations beginning with Keele Street in winter 2013  Construction of TBM launch and extraction shafts at Eglinton West station  TBMs arriving on site in spring 2013  Tendering of project
  • 6.
    New Approach: Alternative Financingand Procurement (AFP) Public-private partnership models have been underway in Canada for 20 years  165 projects  21 transportation projects  $51 billion total project value Canada-wide examples  Canada Line rapid transit project (Vancouver)  Autoroute 25 (Montréal)  Trans-Canada Highway (Atlantic Canada) Ontario examples  Pan Am games athletes village  Ottawa Light Rail Transit  Highway 407 East Phase 1  Rt. Hon. Herb Gray Parkway (formerly the Windsor-Essex Parkway)
  • 7.
  • 8.
    New Approach: Advantagesof AFP Increased capacity to bring projects to market Transfer of risk  Appropriate risks transferred to private sector to ensure “on time, on budget” delivery and offer value for money  Design, construction, cost escalation, schedule delays, operations, maintenance, life cycle, financial risk Cost certainty  Optimal cost combination: combines capital, maintenance and life cycle costs  Integration of design and construction
  • 9.
    New Approach: Rolesand Responsibilities in the Design Build Finance Maintain Model Metrolinx Role  Finance  Design • Project Budget • Overall scope (inclusion of • With Infrastructure Ontario run a maintenance, operations, etc.) competitive procurement process; • Project-Specific Output select the winning contractor Specifications (with Consultant team)  Maintain • Real Estate Acquisition (with • Testing & Commissioning (with City of Toronto) Toronto Transit Commission) • Safety Certification and Project  Build Acceptance • Oversee Construction Phase • Quality Assurance  TTC to operate • Integrated with existing TTC system
  • 10.
    Approach to newtransit: Light Rail Transit
  • 11.
    Approach to StationDesign: Urban Design Principles  Locate station entrances and vents to limit the amount of frontage impacted  Explore opportunities to consolidate and locate above grade mechanical vent shafts where their impacts on adjacent development can be minimized  Site station entrances and ventilation infrastructure with possible new development in mind  Locate primary and secondary entrances so that they can help to contribute to the creation of a consistent building setback  Minimize the impact of vents and other facilities through careful siting
  • 12.
    Approach to StationDesign: Architectural Principles  Station and stop designs should reflect their civic role through high quality architecture and urban design.  Logos, station names, and signage should be used boldly and consistently to reinforce station identity  Signage and way finding shall be highly standardized  Variation of treatments used to differentiate stations  Stations can embrace the local context through design or art installations  The Public Realm should be used as an opportunity to enhance user experience and integrate stations into their surroundings
  • 13.
    Approach to StationDesign: Safety and accessibility  Elevators will be included in all stations  Designated waiting areas will be included in all stations  Stations will use standard elements to make them familiar to passengers with accessibility challenges  Integrate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles into station design  Light colours will be used to improve safety and efficiency  Incorporate fully glazed station entrances to maximize light
  • 14.
    Approach to StationDesign: Public Realm Elements Public Realm  Implementation of streetscape, furniture, and tree planting standards  Widen sidewalks within station area  Stations entrances will be identified by a consistent pylon sign  Some stations will include landscaped plazas which will: • Compliment the design of the station • Include pedestrian level lighting • Include trees, hard and soft landscaping
  • 15.
    Approach to StationDesign: Public Art  Stations will feature public art  Artwork will be integrated with architectural finishes or elements of the stations and plazas  Surface stops may also include public art
  • 16.
    Reference Concept Design  Stations are shown as a Reference Concept Design (RCD)  Reference concept designs, or functional designs, are used in the AFP model as inputs to the development of the Request for Proposal (RFP)  The functional design is intended to identify the location of entrances, exits and ancillary station (ventilation) equipment  Functional designs are not intended to provide architectural details for stations  The AFP partner will be developing designs for the stations and these will be subject to public input
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Keele Station Local Context:Land Use Legend Commercial use: Residential use: Institutional use:
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Keele Station Secondary Entrances South East Corner North West Corner
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Caledonia Station Local Context:Land Use Legend Commercial use: Residential use:
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Dufferin Station Local Context:Demand Population Density within a 10 minute walk to Dufferin Station
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Oakwood Station Street View North Side South Side
  • 41.
    Traction Power Substation  Traction power substations (TPSS) provide system power to light rail vehicles  For underground stations TPSS are integrated with stations buildings  They are planned with an average spacing of 1.5 km along surface sections and 2 km along underground sections  Integrated with adjacent landscape  Final locations still to be determined • Keele • Don Mills • Dufferin • Wynford • Bathurst • Jonesville • Yonge • Warden • Bayview
  • 42.
    Contact Us  Community Office: 1848 Eglinton Ave W.  416-782-8118  crosstown@metrolinx.com  http://thecrosstown.ca
  • 43.