By Yana Puckett, MD

Evaluating health status
Patient reported outcomes
Patient safety
Preventing medical errors
Technology and its impact on patient safety
and patient care
Introduction

 In order to improve patient safety, evaluation
process of some kind needs to exist.
 EHR is enabling the US Health Care system to
monitor patient safety more accurately.
 EHR allows monitoring of all patients in real time.
 Chronic Disease Management: patients who comply
with prescribed medications are typically healthier.
 This is where data collection, data sharing, and data
analysis come in.
Evaluating Health Status

Human error is inevitable, i.e. to err is human,
and poses risks to patient safety.
US Medical Health Care System: medical error
estimated 98,000 deaths and $38 billion per year.
Human error is based on cognition, and thus is
predictable.
If we can predict risks for human error, health
systems can be designed to minimize risk for
human error.
Patient Safety

 Most cases of errors are not willful negligence, rather
systemic flaws, lack of communication, patient
ignorance.
 One unintentional error is unfortunate. But, repeated
error is a crime.
Error

 Illegible writing prescription by doctors.
 Wrong medicine or wrong dose, wrong route of
administration.
 Drip sets, iatrogenic fluid overload.
 Poor handing over of patients “sign-out” during
shift change.
 Healthcare staff exhaustion.
Sources of Error in
Health Care Setting

 Adverse Health Care Event
 Adverse Drug Reaction
 Medication Error
 Sentinel Event: Surgery on wrong body part,
surgery on wrong patient, patients receiving wrong
medication.
 Healthcare Near Miss: Situation in which an event
or omission arising during clinical care fails to
develop further, thus preventing injury.
Different Types of
Errors

 Airline industry has very little room for error, as a
result
 Voluntary (without jeopardy) reporting of error
culture.
 Recurring statutory examinations.
 Systems development.
 Safety analysis of data.
 Acceptance that mistakes will be made.
 Teamwork mentality.
Airline Industry Safety
Lessons

 Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: held in all
specialties in all hospitals around the world. Focused
not on blame, but on prevention and identification of
why the error happened. Focused on systems
prevention.
 Important to cultivate a culture of open
communication in the hospital and less on blame so
as to facilitate every error recognition and ultimately
solution to improve patient safety.
Importance of Reporting
and Learning

 Design system to prevent errors
 Design procedures to make error visible when they
occur so the error may be stopped.
 Design procedures for mitigating the adverse effects
of errors when they do occur or could not be
intercepted.
Strategies for Design of
Safe Systems of Care

 Encouraging team work mentality and speaking up
freely when an error is observed.
 Double checking such as when a prescription is
ordered by a pharmacist or nurse.
 EMR automated checks for allergy and prescribed
medication ordered.
 Education of patients and creating a safe
environment where questions by patients can be
asked and answered.
Preventing Errors


 Errors cannot be reduced to zero, thus, need to know
how to mitigate errors to avoid catastrophic results.
 Ex: Antidote drugs available if an error resulted in
overdose of drug.
Mitigating Errors

 Reduce complexity: reduce steps in task, number of choices,
duration of execution, distracting tasks.
 Optimize information processing: reduce reliance of memory
or preserve short term memory for essential tasks by utilizing
checklists, protocols , etc.
 Automate wisely: use technology to support not supplant the
human operator.
 Use constraints: restrict actions, such as informed consents,
computer order systems that prevent abnormally high doses of
medication from being ordered.
 Mitigate the unwanted side effects of change: time during
learning curve for a new procedure/equipment exits, during
which harm and error are increased – take precautions.
Tactics

 A lot of emphasis on EMR to avoid medical error. But,
can too much hope be placed on a computer to avoid
medical error?
 Do protocols apply to every individual in the same way?
 What about faulty programming and technical
dysfunctions?
 Some argue that new mistakes may be generated by
utilizing computerized systems to prevent medical errors.
 Important to be aware of computer system limitations in
healthcare to prevent these mistakes from happening.
Information Technology
and Healthcare

 Study found that length/maturity of hospital quality
improvement system correlates with better patient
outcomes.
 Promising results that with time, adjustments will be
made and patient safety will improve as a result of
recent changes to the US healthcare system.
 As these changes are being made, evaluation of
changes and health programs is crucial in adjusting,
changing, or stopping certain changes.
Conclusion

1. Nolan, T.W. (2000). System changes to improve patient safety. British
Medical Journal, 320, 771- 773.
2. Ash, J.S., Berg, M., & Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences of
information technology in health care: The nature of patient care
information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical
Informatics Association, 11, 104-112.
3. Wiedemann, L.A. (2012). A look at unintended consequences of EHRs: the
industry needs to focus on building EHRs that decrease medical errors
and enhance patient care. Health Management Technology, 33(2), 24-25.
4. Groene, O., Mora, N., Thompson, A., Saez, M., Casas, M., & Sunol, R.
(2011). Is the maturity of hospitals’ quality improvement systems
associated with measures of quality & patient safety? BMC Health
Services Research, 11, 344.
5. Davis, A.M. (2011). Teaching quality and cost in the tumultuous era of
health care reform. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54(2), 256-266.
6. Maynard, A., & McDaid, D. (2003). Evaluating health interventions:
exploiting the potential. Health Policy, 63, 215-226.
Referecnes

Patient Satisfaction, Patient Reported Outcomes, Safety, and Quality of Care

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Evaluating health status Patientreported outcomes Patient safety Preventing medical errors Technology and its impact on patient safety and patient care Introduction
  • 3.
      In orderto improve patient safety, evaluation process of some kind needs to exist.  EHR is enabling the US Health Care system to monitor patient safety more accurately.  EHR allows monitoring of all patients in real time.  Chronic Disease Management: patients who comply with prescribed medications are typically healthier.  This is where data collection, data sharing, and data analysis come in. Evaluating Health Status
  • 4.
     Human error isinevitable, i.e. to err is human, and poses risks to patient safety. US Medical Health Care System: medical error estimated 98,000 deaths and $38 billion per year. Human error is based on cognition, and thus is predictable. If we can predict risks for human error, health systems can be designed to minimize risk for human error. Patient Safety
  • 5.
      Most casesof errors are not willful negligence, rather systemic flaws, lack of communication, patient ignorance.  One unintentional error is unfortunate. But, repeated error is a crime. Error
  • 6.
      Illegible writingprescription by doctors.  Wrong medicine or wrong dose, wrong route of administration.  Drip sets, iatrogenic fluid overload.  Poor handing over of patients “sign-out” during shift change.  Healthcare staff exhaustion. Sources of Error in Health Care Setting
  • 7.
      Adverse HealthCare Event  Adverse Drug Reaction  Medication Error  Sentinel Event: Surgery on wrong body part, surgery on wrong patient, patients receiving wrong medication.  Healthcare Near Miss: Situation in which an event or omission arising during clinical care fails to develop further, thus preventing injury. Different Types of Errors
  • 8.
      Airline industryhas very little room for error, as a result  Voluntary (without jeopardy) reporting of error culture.  Recurring statutory examinations.  Systems development.  Safety analysis of data.  Acceptance that mistakes will be made.  Teamwork mentality. Airline Industry Safety Lessons
  • 9.
      Morbidity andMortality Conferences: held in all specialties in all hospitals around the world. Focused not on blame, but on prevention and identification of why the error happened. Focused on systems prevention.  Important to cultivate a culture of open communication in the hospital and less on blame so as to facilitate every error recognition and ultimately solution to improve patient safety. Importance of Reporting and Learning
  • 10.
      Design systemto prevent errors  Design procedures to make error visible when they occur so the error may be stopped.  Design procedures for mitigating the adverse effects of errors when they do occur or could not be intercepted. Strategies for Design of Safe Systems of Care
  • 11.
      Encouraging teamwork mentality and speaking up freely when an error is observed.  Double checking such as when a prescription is ordered by a pharmacist or nurse.  EMR automated checks for allergy and prescribed medication ordered.  Education of patients and creating a safe environment where questions by patients can be asked and answered. Preventing Errors
  • 12.
  • 13.
      Errors cannotbe reduced to zero, thus, need to know how to mitigate errors to avoid catastrophic results.  Ex: Antidote drugs available if an error resulted in overdose of drug. Mitigating Errors
  • 14.
      Reduce complexity:reduce steps in task, number of choices, duration of execution, distracting tasks.  Optimize information processing: reduce reliance of memory or preserve short term memory for essential tasks by utilizing checklists, protocols , etc.  Automate wisely: use technology to support not supplant the human operator.  Use constraints: restrict actions, such as informed consents, computer order systems that prevent abnormally high doses of medication from being ordered.  Mitigate the unwanted side effects of change: time during learning curve for a new procedure/equipment exits, during which harm and error are increased – take precautions. Tactics
  • 15.
      A lotof emphasis on EMR to avoid medical error. But, can too much hope be placed on a computer to avoid medical error?  Do protocols apply to every individual in the same way?  What about faulty programming and technical dysfunctions?  Some argue that new mistakes may be generated by utilizing computerized systems to prevent medical errors.  Important to be aware of computer system limitations in healthcare to prevent these mistakes from happening. Information Technology and Healthcare
  • 16.
      Study foundthat length/maturity of hospital quality improvement system correlates with better patient outcomes.  Promising results that with time, adjustments will be made and patient safety will improve as a result of recent changes to the US healthcare system.  As these changes are being made, evaluation of changes and health programs is crucial in adjusting, changing, or stopping certain changes. Conclusion
  • 17.
     1. Nolan, T.W.(2000). System changes to improve patient safety. British Medical Journal, 320, 771- 773. 2. Ash, J.S., Berg, M., & Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 104-112. 3. Wiedemann, L.A. (2012). A look at unintended consequences of EHRs: the industry needs to focus on building EHRs that decrease medical errors and enhance patient care. Health Management Technology, 33(2), 24-25. 4. Groene, O., Mora, N., Thompson, A., Saez, M., Casas, M., & Sunol, R. (2011). Is the maturity of hospitals’ quality improvement systems associated with measures of quality & patient safety? BMC Health Services Research, 11, 344. 5. Davis, A.M. (2011). Teaching quality and cost in the tumultuous era of health care reform. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54(2), 256-266. 6. Maynard, A., & McDaid, D. (2003). Evaluating health interventions: exploiting the potential. Health Policy, 63, 215-226. Referecnes