Webigagement EDEN 2016
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•581 views
Nordplus Project https://effectivewebinars.wordpress.com/ presents how to make a dicdactic structure of interactive webinars by the WEbigagement model
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (10)
Similar to Webigagement EDEN 2016
Similar to Webigagement EDEN 2016 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Webigagement EDEN 2016
- 2. Structure of the Engaging Webinar Pre online • Guide for participants • Guide for facilitators • Design Webinar • Board & Play • Contribute • Share • Build & Exchange Post online • Reflections • Keep content alive
- 4. 5 Principles by Cynthia Clay
- 5. 5 Stage Model by Gilly Salmon 1. Access & Motivation 2. Culture Building 3. Co-operation 4. Collaboration 5. Development
- 6. 4 Steps for Webinars 4 – Build & Exchange 3 – Share Content 2 – Contribute 1 – Board & Play
- 7. • To do • Questions 1 – Board & Play - Hello – how is the weather? - What is your webinar experience?
- 8. • To do • Questions 2 – Contribute - Chat on terms - Comment on slides
- 9. • To do • Questions 3 – Share Content - What challenges could this be used for? - How does this apply i your daily work?
- 10. • To do • Questions 4 – Build & Exchange - Give an example of when something like this happened to you? - What is the biggest take-away from to- day’s webinar?
- 11. Sparkline of Taxonomy 2 Board 3 Contribute 4 Share 5 Exchange 1 Pre- Online 6 Post- Online
- 12. Question What kind of key factors for an interactive webinar do you have in mind when planning a webinar?
Editor's Notes
- Introduction – 3 parts (pre – reflect on design) Why – to make all feel safe and relaxed and motivated How - to engage the attendees What - of practical tips & tricks, concept is didactical point of view on webinars
- What - Example on a pre online Guide for participants
- What - The webigage- concept is founded on CC – ’5 principles for Maximum Engagement’ in webinars GS - That is we have combined these two sources into a didactical model for engagement in online meetings
- What All steps forudsætter hinanden = requires is a condition for next step Pre-requisites
- Each step is a kind of pre-requiset to the other steps - just like the 5-stage-model – you can’t just jump one over – then you breake the chain ! Customized 5-stages-model for into 4 stages with webinars, after combining cc and gs Step 1 – Board and play - testing easy pods, play and make the attendees safe on board Board and Play - here the participants need to get on board the webinar system and discover the meeting room by socializing with pods like: ’How is the weather’, ’Your webinar experience’. We did that by testing some of the easy pods such as Status Icons by asking ’If they had had a nice summerholiday’. The purpose was to make participants play with the pods to make them feel safe on board. Step 2 Contribute with content - interact with variety of pods and content of known knowledge - here the participants are expected to interact with the content. We did that by inviting to chats on the subject and ran some polls on their experiences with e.g. types of LMS’s. Step 3 – Share content- interact with variety of pods on stimulate attendees to think, require them to combine info or provide evidence from info of the former stages in the webinar Step 4 – Build and exchange Knowledge/roles : interact solve problems = make learning sticky via cases, exchange roles, let attendess pressent and rule First we informed and provided the participants with our Pre-Webinar Guidelines. Then we applied step 1 and step 2 from the webigage-model. Why Asking questions when interacting? Via diverse pods? Develop interest in the topic Check on learner readiness Review key concepts Stimulate thinking and insight Develop critical thinking skills Encourage learning transfer
- Why > Purpose – In short – its all about get on board, discover, socialize and showing interest in the participants knowledge and interests = feel at home ;) Make icebreakers -> where do you come from – map to pin your position etc.
- Why > Purpose = In short: explore and contribute with known stuff should make the participants more motivated and responcibility in contributing to the fællesskab in webinar Ask questions like ….> Definitions on the subject Lower cogitive (closed quesiton): Probe for facts, Usually closed, Direct, Stimulate recal, Check for knowledge
- Why > purpose Shortly – feel sage, recognize knowledge and combine info from former stages in the webinar stimulate attendees to think, require them to combine info or provide evidence Ask questions like ….> How could you apply this on your job? Examples on open ended questions (higher cognitive) How would you apply this … How does this apply in your daily work How could you apply this on your job
- Why > purpose – Short – gaining self-insight and reflect and evaluate - cases, exchange roles, let attendess pressent and rule Ask questions like …> Why to you think this is important? Open ended questions (higher cognitive) What is the biggest tage-away from to-day’s webinar Reflect: Why do you think this is important Give an example of when something like this happened to you
- Finally webigagement provides a safe sparkline of interactivity–progresssion during af web-sesssion – that is the interaction with incressing difficulty – like Blooms taxanomy of learning. That is: 1: pre online guide: browser, update flash etc., headset, wifi-speed, behave, coffee in your cup, 1-4 online 6 post online