Waterfall-ITIL vs. Agile-DevOps




Simple lessons from Frankenstein and Star Trek
                                     By Paul Peissner
Waterfall & Frankenstein
Waterfall has many high-risk & hard-to
explain complexities under the covers
Historically, it has proven to be
slow, unreliable & disappointing
And it appears almost miraculous if you can make it work

                                It’s s Alive!
Yes, it is working! But is it
repeatable or sustainable?
Development does not want to
look at it after Ops releases it!
Waterfall-ITIL struggle with
Change Management flexibility
“You are my creator,
 but now I am your master!”
Agile & Tribbles
Agile is so small, cute,
cuddly and harmless…
Agile appears so friendly that
everyone wants one today…
But Agile can overwhelm Ops & Asset
Management practices pretty quickly…
And Agile can create new
business problems too..
Change Committee
ITIL and Asset Management
…always expected Waterfall Apps!
- Millions of Code lines                       Asset
- Thousands of contributors
- Hundreds of features
                                                        Developer
- Over many years
- Big and disruptive!
DevOps and Asset Management…always expecting Agile Apps!
                       - 10’s of Code lines
                           - With more Common/Repeatable Services
                           - Infrastructure & Deployment as Code
                       - 5-7 Micro teams
                           - How big is your pizza? How many teams needed?
                           - Code as Asset…Code Reuse as a standard….
                       - 3-7 Features
                           - Fewer moving parts, more code IP to protect
                       - Over 3-6 weeks
                           - Faster moving process, to grow the business
                       - Small and invisible!
Now let’s talk about DevOps
 (Agile Dev and Best-practice Ops)
But some Dilbert Advice to consider…
      before we get started…

                               Waterfall experience




   DevOps
            Waterfall Brain.

Waterfall-ITIL vs Agile-DevOps

  • 1.
    Waterfall-ITIL vs. Agile-DevOps Simplelessons from Frankenstein and Star Trek By Paul Peissner
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Waterfall has manyhigh-risk & hard-to explain complexities under the covers
  • 4.
    Historically, it hasproven to be slow, unreliable & disappointing
  • 5.
    And it appearsalmost miraculous if you can make it work It’s s Alive!
  • 6.
    Yes, it isworking! But is it repeatable or sustainable?
  • 7.
    Development does notwant to look at it after Ops releases it!
  • 8.
  • 9.
    “You are mycreator, but now I am your master!”
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Agile is sosmall, cute, cuddly and harmless…
  • 12.
    Agile appears sofriendly that everyone wants one today…
  • 13.
    But Agile canoverwhelm Ops & Asset Management practices pretty quickly…
  • 14.
    And Agile cancreate new business problems too..
  • 15.
    Change Committee ITIL andAsset Management …always expected Waterfall Apps! - Millions of Code lines Asset - Thousands of contributors - Hundreds of features Developer - Over many years - Big and disruptive! DevOps and Asset Management…always expecting Agile Apps! - 10’s of Code lines - With more Common/Repeatable Services - Infrastructure & Deployment as Code - 5-7 Micro teams - How big is your pizza? How many teams needed? - Code as Asset…Code Reuse as a standard…. - 3-7 Features - Fewer moving parts, more code IP to protect - Over 3-6 weeks - Faster moving process, to grow the business - Small and invisible!
  • 16.
    Now let’s talkabout DevOps (Agile Dev and Best-practice Ops)
  • 17.
    But some DilbertAdvice to consider… before we get started… Waterfall experience DevOps Waterfall Brain.