This document discusses taking a transdisciplinary systems approach to improving wellbeing in universities. It notes that both students and staff experience higher rates of mental illness than the general population. A transdisciplinary approach integrates knowledge from different fields through participation and action-oriented projects with an ongoing learning process. One project discussed is a Wellbeing Research and Innovation Hub bringing together staff, students, and different areas of expertise to address wellbeing holistically. Reflection on projects emphasizes the importance of mutual learning and scrutiny of choices in integrating diverse perspectives. Open questions are posed on helping people adopt a systemic view of wellbeing and what else is required to further improve university wellbeing.
Designing a student and staff well-being feedback loop to inform university policy and governance
https://rsdsymposium.org/mywellnesscheck-designing-a-student-and-staff-well-being-feedback-loop-to-inform-university-policy-and-governance/
Designing a student and staff well-being feedback loop to inform university policy and governance
https://rsdsymposium.org/mywellnesscheck-designing-a-student-and-staff-well-being-feedback-loop-to-inform-university-policy-and-governance/
Dr Derk Loorbach provides a transition perspective to address the complexities and uncertainty of change and presents development by design as a way forward. RSD10 NOV 2021
The main mission of systems-oriented design is to build the designer’s own interpretation and implementation of systems thinking so that systems thinking can fully benefit from design thinking and practice and vice versa.
Systems Thinking has been an important feature in the Tavistock Institute’s research and consultancy work from the beginning in 1947. Central to our action research work with major industries in the 1950-70’s, it formed the core of theory and practice related to ‘sociotechnical systems’ work. This tradition continued within our evaluation activities from the 1980’s onward, and features in several of our current projects. These have received added impetus from the growing interest in complexity theory and its application to evaluation practice, encouraged by our involvement in activities such as the Centre for Complexity in Evaluation across the Nexus (CECAN) and the writing of an annex to the revised Magenta book (Cross-Government Evaluation Group) published on 27 March this year.
This talk on Systems Thinking offers the opportunity for you to reflect with us on what we have learnt from the past, how we are currently applying this – and where systems thinking will be taking us next.
Designing Futures to Flourish: ISSS 2015 keynotePeter Jones
We now find ourselves as a systems thinking community inquiring into planetary governance for climate and ecological politics. The Anthropocene demands a planetary response, and yet we often find even our fellow travelers tethered to discourses of technological management, cultural change, and right action. We might now advocate a stronger role for social systems design as a process for continual engagement of citizen stakeholders, and between these citizens and policy makers, as advocated by Christakis, Ulrich and others. As we have seen power (economic and political) separate from its cultural histories, and become globalized, we may find ourselves in trajectories of action but with marginal power to effect societal outcomes.
We are faced with a dual mandate of restorative system design, recovering human needs in our communities, and policy system design, restoring the long historical arc toward democratic governance. And as these are both designable contexts, systemic design can integrate ecological, technological and design thinking to guide policy in more productive ways.
• We find ourselves captured in the politics of solutionism. Most presentations of the “problems” as stated before us reveal a trajectory of preferred solutions and their possible shortcomings.
• Climate change, even the entire Anthropocene aeonic perspective, represents a problematique of multiple effects systems. We are bound up in political discourses of “system change” and do not share a compelling common view of a flourishing world. We seem unable to reregister the most compelling societal choices and drivers save carbon mitigation.
• We have not conducted, to my knowledge, a substantial stakeholder discovery that extends beyond the immediate and obvious primary combatants in the climate change wars.
• As citizens and political actors on the planetary stage, we have been afraid or unable to present a clear view of the risk scenarios, possible governance strategies, or a normative plan for serious global investment. If the planet were a business concern, it would be in receivership by now.
Presentation by Peter Jones at RSD4 Banff, Alberta, 2015. Society can be defined as an object of culture, as culture is a medium for the collective development of social systems. Societies are not designed by a deliberative process, but are social entities that emerge over time as response to historicity and cultural development, and function largely by tacit agreement as observed in social norms.
In the 1960’s social systemicists such as Ozbekhan, Fuller, and Doxiadis advocated deliberative civic planning as a normative science for designing sustainable and preferable societies and settlements. Even though their original methodologies of normative planning (Ozbekhan), anticipatory design science (Fuller) and ekistics (Doxiadis) did not gain the results hoped in applications over time, these arguments could be lodged against most systems methodologies. Yet when we consider their views of the human capacity to design future outcomes as a serious social and political project, we in our fragmented polities in the postmodern era might take heed. An argument follows that we, as cultural innovators in our own societies, having access to the wisdom of successful past transitions or redirections, have also failed to motivate and enact changes requisite to our common concerns.
A systemic design approach is proposed toward constructing such idealizations as a necessary initial condition. The approach reconciles wisdom from our sociocultural histories with collaborative design practices of the current era to construct shared pathways to desired and feasible societal futures.
When analyzing and designing a product, service, or system, minor adaptations to existing design processes can go a long way to expand beyond a techno-centric system perspective, or an exclusively "convenience and ease of use" user experience profile. By assigning critical questions to each step of a design process, we can resituate our working understanding of a technical system within its human context and expand our sociotechnical analysis to include matters of normative and ethical concern. These critical questions address concerns including inclusivity, duty of care, sustainability, and prevention of harm. From the newly expanded ethical context these questions help construct, it is possible to imagine opportunities for value-led change within the relationships of a sociotechnical system.
Dr Derk Loorbach provides a transition perspective to address the complexities and uncertainty of change and presents development by design as a way forward. RSD10 NOV 2021
The main mission of systems-oriented design is to build the designer’s own interpretation and implementation of systems thinking so that systems thinking can fully benefit from design thinking and practice and vice versa.
Systems Thinking has been an important feature in the Tavistock Institute’s research and consultancy work from the beginning in 1947. Central to our action research work with major industries in the 1950-70’s, it formed the core of theory and practice related to ‘sociotechnical systems’ work. This tradition continued within our evaluation activities from the 1980’s onward, and features in several of our current projects. These have received added impetus from the growing interest in complexity theory and its application to evaluation practice, encouraged by our involvement in activities such as the Centre for Complexity in Evaluation across the Nexus (CECAN) and the writing of an annex to the revised Magenta book (Cross-Government Evaluation Group) published on 27 March this year.
This talk on Systems Thinking offers the opportunity for you to reflect with us on what we have learnt from the past, how we are currently applying this – and where systems thinking will be taking us next.
Designing Futures to Flourish: ISSS 2015 keynotePeter Jones
We now find ourselves as a systems thinking community inquiring into planetary governance for climate and ecological politics. The Anthropocene demands a planetary response, and yet we often find even our fellow travelers tethered to discourses of technological management, cultural change, and right action. We might now advocate a stronger role for social systems design as a process for continual engagement of citizen stakeholders, and between these citizens and policy makers, as advocated by Christakis, Ulrich and others. As we have seen power (economic and political) separate from its cultural histories, and become globalized, we may find ourselves in trajectories of action but with marginal power to effect societal outcomes.
We are faced with a dual mandate of restorative system design, recovering human needs in our communities, and policy system design, restoring the long historical arc toward democratic governance. And as these are both designable contexts, systemic design can integrate ecological, technological and design thinking to guide policy in more productive ways.
• We find ourselves captured in the politics of solutionism. Most presentations of the “problems” as stated before us reveal a trajectory of preferred solutions and their possible shortcomings.
• Climate change, even the entire Anthropocene aeonic perspective, represents a problematique of multiple effects systems. We are bound up in political discourses of “system change” and do not share a compelling common view of a flourishing world. We seem unable to reregister the most compelling societal choices and drivers save carbon mitigation.
• We have not conducted, to my knowledge, a substantial stakeholder discovery that extends beyond the immediate and obvious primary combatants in the climate change wars.
• As citizens and political actors on the planetary stage, we have been afraid or unable to present a clear view of the risk scenarios, possible governance strategies, or a normative plan for serious global investment. If the planet were a business concern, it would be in receivership by now.
Presentation by Peter Jones at RSD4 Banff, Alberta, 2015. Society can be defined as an object of culture, as culture is a medium for the collective development of social systems. Societies are not designed by a deliberative process, but are social entities that emerge over time as response to historicity and cultural development, and function largely by tacit agreement as observed in social norms.
In the 1960’s social systemicists such as Ozbekhan, Fuller, and Doxiadis advocated deliberative civic planning as a normative science for designing sustainable and preferable societies and settlements. Even though their original methodologies of normative planning (Ozbekhan), anticipatory design science (Fuller) and ekistics (Doxiadis) did not gain the results hoped in applications over time, these arguments could be lodged against most systems methodologies. Yet when we consider their views of the human capacity to design future outcomes as a serious social and political project, we in our fragmented polities in the postmodern era might take heed. An argument follows that we, as cultural innovators in our own societies, having access to the wisdom of successful past transitions or redirections, have also failed to motivate and enact changes requisite to our common concerns.
A systemic design approach is proposed toward constructing such idealizations as a necessary initial condition. The approach reconciles wisdom from our sociocultural histories with collaborative design practices of the current era to construct shared pathways to desired and feasible societal futures.
When analyzing and designing a product, service, or system, minor adaptations to existing design processes can go a long way to expand beyond a techno-centric system perspective, or an exclusively "convenience and ease of use" user experience profile. By assigning critical questions to each step of a design process, we can resituate our working understanding of a technical system within its human context and expand our sociotechnical analysis to include matters of normative and ethical concern. These critical questions address concerns including inclusivity, duty of care, sustainability, and prevention of harm. From the newly expanded ethical context these questions help construct, it is possible to imagine opportunities for value-led change within the relationships of a sociotechnical system.
Co-creating the curriculum - Jane PriestleyHEA_HSC
This workshop was part of the HEA engagement event '
The full picture: the journey from listening to partnership in student engagement'.
This workshop was designed for curriculum developers, programme leads, those with an interest in public engagement in higher education, including those working in patient and public involvement, and community engagement in higher education.
The session provided an opportunity for delegates to assess the potential of the students as partners framework, as a basis for informing the contribution of public engagement in curriculum design and delivery.
This presentation forms part of a blog post about the workshop that can be accessed via http://bit.ly/1vnbN7A
Amgen Teach - How to promote health by facilitating scientific reasoning, cri...Go-Lab Initiative
Read about the presentation of Amgen Teach on "How to promote health by facilitating scientific reasoning, critical thinking and engagement skills" at the 12th Science Projects Workshop in the Future Classroom Lab.
Keynote presentation for the Education Leaders Forum - New Zealand. Abstract: The COVID pandemic has thrown back the curtain on a great deal of what needs to be improved or addressed in our current education system, including a high degree of inequity across all areas, especially access to onlinelearning.
The responses we saw during the 2020 lockdowns promised some transformative action and outcomes. But slowly we’ve seen a ‘return to the old normal’ mindset. The ‘big ideas’ that were evident have faded into obscurity as the old patterns of thinking and acting take over.
My presentation 2-3 March 2023 on Innovation education for blended learning for improving Media literacy, at the INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE
Media Literacy and Information Technology: Challenges and Solutions for the 21st Century, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
An ever greater emphasis is being put upon the need for academic research to make an impact in the real world, whether that be supporting teaching; helping organizations to be better managed; influencing public bodies and policymakers; contributing to economic development; or benefitting society and the environment. While citations are the established measure of academic influence, and downloads and altmetrics can be seen as measures of ‘attention;’ funders and institutions are now looking for evidence of measurable change. This presentation explores how the academy and industry view the impact of academic output, will explore evidence of theory being applied in practice, and look at how pathways to impact are achieved.
Managing Global Research: Risk, Relationships & Evaluating OutcomesSandy Justice
2016 Society of Research Administrators International annual meeting presentation by Kiki Caruson, PhD (University of South Florida) and Sandy Justice (Emory University)
Similar to Van Der Bijl-Brouwer Wellbeing in Universities (20)
RSD10 Keynote. Dr Klaus Krippendorff suggests that designers become critical of what their work supports and cognizant of and accountable for the systemic consequences of their designs.
A cross-sectoral project for the systemic design of regional dyeing value chains
https://rsdsymposium.org/design-circular-colours-regional-dyeing-value-chains/
Balancing Acceleration and Systemic Impact: Finding leverage for transformation in SDG change strategies
https://rsdsymposium.org/balancing-acceleration-and-systemic-impact-finding-leverage-for-transformation-in-sdg-change-strategies/
Using scenarios for system prototyping
https://rsdsymposium.org/option-evaluation-in-multi-disciplinary-strategic-design-using-scenarios-for-system-prototyping/
Can AI do good? at 'offtheCanvas' India HCI preludeAlan Dix
Invited talk at 'offtheCanvas' IndiaHCI prelude, 29th June 2024.
https://www.alandix.com/academic/talks/offtheCanvas-IndiaHCI2024/
The world is being changed fundamentally by AI and we are constantly faced with newspaper headlines about its harmful effects. However, there is also the potential to both ameliorate theses harms and use the new abilities of AI to transform society for the good. Can you make the difference?
White wonder, Work developed by Eva TschoppMansi Shah
White Wonder by Eva Tschopp
A tale about our culture around the use of fertilizers and pesticides visiting small farms around Ahmedabad in Matar and Shilaj.
7 Alternatives to Bullet Points in PowerPointAlvis Oh
So you tried all the ways to beautify your bullet points on your pitch deck but it just got way uglier. These points are supposed to be memorable and leave a lasting impression on your audience. With these tips, you'll no longer have to spend so much time thinking how you should present your pointers.
Unleash Your Inner Demon with the "Let's Summon Demons" T-Shirt. Calling all fans of dark humor and edgy fashion! The "Let's Summon Demons" t-shirt is a unique way to express yourself and turn heads.
https://dribbble.com/shots/24253051-Let-s-Summon-Demons-Shirt
Dive into the innovative world of smart garages with our insightful presentation, "Exploring the Future of Smart Garages." This comprehensive guide covers the latest advancements in garage technology, including automated systems, smart security features, energy efficiency solutions, and seamless integration with smart home ecosystems. Learn how these technologies are transforming traditional garages into high-tech, efficient spaces that enhance convenience, safety, and sustainability.
Ideal for homeowners, tech enthusiasts, and industry professionals, this presentation provides valuable insights into the trends, benefits, and future developments in smart garage technology. Stay ahead of the curve with our expert analysis and practical tips on implementing smart garage solutions.
Коричневый и Кремовый Деликатный Органический Копирайтер Фрилансер Марке...
Van Der Bijl-Brouwer Wellbeing in Universities
1. improving wellbeing in universities – a
transdisciplinary systems change approach
Dr. Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer12, Tyler Key1, Giedre Kligyte1, Bridget
Malcolm1, Prof. Prasuna Reddy3 & Dr. Clementine Thurgood3
1University of Technology Sydney, 2Delft University of Technology, 3Swinburne University of Technology
Relating Systems Thinking & Design symposium 2019
3. a systemic view on wellbeing
wellbeing is the meeting of subjective perceptions of
self with objective health measures
PERMA (Seligman 2011) Wheel of Wellbeing (2008)
4. wellbeing in universities
both university students and staff at are at higher risk of mental-ill-health
than that of the general population (Kinman & Johnson 2019)
students
• 84% of university students experience elevated psychological distress vs 29% of
general population (n=6479, Stallman 2010)
• >40% of PhD students symptoms of depression, emotion or stress-related
problems, or high levels of stress. (Guthrie et. al. 2017)
staff
• Rates of “caseness” in academic staff avg. of 49% vs 39% of professionals
(Kinman 2014)
• 36% of academics working more than 48 hours per week (Kinman 2014)
some statistics…
6. a learning journey towards transdisciplinarity
complex
problem
situation
transdis-
ciplinary
practice
disci-
pline A
disci-
pline B
other
ways of
knowing
other
ways of
knowing
7. a learning journey towards transdisciplinarity
• integrating knowledges/ participation
• action orientation
• purposeful, vision
• holistic, systemic approach
• continuously evolving by ongoing learning
transdisciplinary practices
Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation.
In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, problems of teaching and
research in universities(pp. 97–121). Paris: OECD Publications
https://medium.com/@miekevanderbijl/transdisciplinary-innovation-and-design-d19d1520ddca
8. project: NSW wellbeing collaborative
with Dr. Clementine Thurgood & Lucy Klippan in partnership with the NSW Wellbeing
Collaborative https://wbcnsw.net
9. Indigenous social & emotional wellbeing
Working together, 2014, Editors: Pat Dudgeon, Helen Milroy and Roz Walker; accessed
https://www.telethonkids.org.au
10. a systemic view on wellbeing
wellbeing is the meeting of subjective perceptions of
self, and the collective, with objective health measures
11. a systemic view on wellbeing innovation & research
staff and student initiatives
design by Kate Elton
source: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/243640282/the-little-book-for-
big-worries?ref=shop_home_feat_2
12. a learning journey towards transdisciplinarity
• integrating knowledge/ participation
• action orientation
• purposeful, vision
• holistic, systemic approach
• ongoing learning
transdisciplinarity our approach
• staff & students participate
• more action!
13. a learning journey towards transdisciplinarity
• integrating knowledge/ participation
• action orientation
• purposeful, vision
• holistic, systemic approach
• ongoing learning
transdisciplinarity our approach
• holistic view on
wellbeing
• integration of wellbeing,
education & research
• work with what is already
happening in the
university..
• and connect these
initiatives
14. wellbeing research & innovation hub
with professor Prasuna Reddy, Bridget Malcolm, Tyler Key & others
Funded by UTS HR & Student Services
15. • how we work with people within the system is
key
• we need a step-by-step evolutionary approach
and be more explicit about how we learn
17. transdisciplinary collaboration and reflexivity
transdisciplinary approaches emphasise mutual
learning between a range of participants through
deliberate processes of reflexivity – “on-going
scrutiny of the choices that are made when
identifying and integrating diverse values, priorities,
worldviews, expertise and knowledge” (Polk, 2015)
Polk, Merritt. "Transdisciplinary Co-Production: Designing and Testing a
Transdisciplinary Research Framework for Societal Problem Solving."
Futures 65 (2015/01/01/ 2015): 110-22.
ongoing learning
19. reflexivity in the Student Service Hub project
• reflexive writing
• space for mutual learning
20. student services hub project
• ins
what is a student services hub?
design by UTS SSH team: Bethany Hooper, Jarnae Leslie, Eleanor Salazar, Tyler Key in
partnership with Giedre Kligyte and Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer
21. systems change?
“I think the university should have better processes.
Maybe it's just consultation but even consultation's
quite hard to do because we struggle to find other
than giving out pizza vouchers and hoping that
someone sees it.”
reflection from project management office
22. a transdisciplinary approach to academic wellbeing
• vision: a holistic approach: from individual wellbeing
to ‘community’ wellbeing; from separate service to
integrated in research & education
• a focus on relationships and how we work together
• an ongoing learning process
• what’s next? …
23. a transdisciplinary approach to academic wellbeing
• how can we help people adopt a systemic view of
wellbeing in universities?
• what is required to further improve wellbeing in
universities?
• what other academic theories or fields could
contribute to understanding of wellbeing within
universities?
questions for the RSD audience