SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•
B
Bert Granberg

- Project Overview - State BB Map with state base maps and locator services - Availability Analysis using 2010 census block level housing unit counts - Mobile broadband drive testing, 6000 miles - Address points

1 of 44
Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data Submissions: Service Areas, Speeds, Tech Type Infrastructure, Anchor Institutions, etc. Electronic Upload Pen & Ink Web Conference Map Views ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Where does the data go? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Overall State Coverage
Service By Address
Technology + Speed Filter: Wireless
Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
10 Day Update Cycle
Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map
Broadband Availability Analysis
2010 Census Block Data
Process ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
“ Trimmed Census Blocks” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Before After
Results
Class #1: Basic Consumer ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Mobile Wireless Availability July 2011 Field Tests
Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Background ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Goals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes
Drive Testing, July 4 – July 23, 2010 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
Mapping Infrastructure: Signal Strength ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mapping Infrastructure: Down/Up Link Speed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage + Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Building Statewide Address Points Using Statewide Address Points ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Maintaining Statewide Address Points Address Point Standards ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],vote Address Points
 
Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
Competition ,[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #3: Higher Capacity ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
Mapped Broadband Technologies
Mobile Availability ,[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Unserved ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet UnservHUPct
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Fall 2011 Mapping Initiatives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Broadband Map Tour

Recommended

Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 ChartsOfcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
comment.ofcom
 
Ontornet
OntornetOntornet
Ontornet
ontornet
 
Nigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumerNigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumer
Adrian Lee
 
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council PresentationUtah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Fyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writingFyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writing
Asyikin Rahim
 
Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Mr SMAK
 
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor AmplifierRF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
Simen Li
 

Recommended

Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 ChartsOfcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
comment.ofcom
 
Ontornet
OntornetOntornet
Ontornet
ontornet
 
Nigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumerNigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumer
Adrian Lee
 
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council PresentationUtah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Fyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writingFyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writing
Asyikin Rahim
 
Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Mr SMAK
 
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor AmplifierRF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
Simen Li
 
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Bert Granberg
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag Kantar TNS
 
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendationCentury Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
tibarnes
 
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdfP33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Christoph Stork
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnTIM RI
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM RI
 
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
Indonesia Network Operators Group
 
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African TelcosOTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
Steve Esselaar
 
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
APNIC
 
When Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility AttacksWhen Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility Attacks
Horace Dediu
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectShiv Verma
 
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG EditionA review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
APNIC
 
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Marco Pangos
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
APNIC
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyCABA
 
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility EurexPresentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility EurexJ Carlos López-Moraleja, CAIA, CHP, ICFA
 
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRSUsing Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Bert Granberg
 

More Related Content

Similar to Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Bert Granberg
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag Kantar TNS
 
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendationCentury Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
tibarnes
 
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdfP33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Christoph Stork
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnTIM RI
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM RI
 
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
Indonesia Network Operators Group
 
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African TelcosOTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
Steve Esselaar
 
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
APNIC
 
When Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility AttacksWhen Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility Attacks
Horace Dediu
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectShiv Verma
 
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG EditionA review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
APNIC
 
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Marco Pangos
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
APNIC
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyCABA
 

Similar to Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation (20)

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
 
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendationCentury Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
 
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdfP33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
 
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
 
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
 
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African TelcosOTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
 
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
 
When Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility AttacksWhen Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility Attacks
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
 
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG EditionA review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
 
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing Study
 
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility EurexPresentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
 

More from Bert Granberg

Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRSUsing Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Bert Granberg
 
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In UtahRethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
Bert Granberg
 
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Bert Granberg
 
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214Bert Granberg
 
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar IgniteSalt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
Bert Granberg
 
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, ChallengesUtah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Bert Granberg
 

More from Bert Granberg (7)

Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
 
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRSUsing Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
 
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In UtahRethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
 
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
 
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
 
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar IgniteSalt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
 
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, ChallengesUtah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
 

Recently uploaded

Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfObservability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Paige Cruz
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
SOFTTECHHUB
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Kumud Singh
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Kari Kakkonen
 
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
SOFTTECHHUB
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
danishmna97
 
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Ana-Maria Mihalceanu
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
Alex Pruden
 
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Albert Hoitingh
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Alpen-Adria-Universität
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Aggregage
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Neo4j
 
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
Kari Kakkonen
 
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfUnlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Malak Abu Hammad
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Neo4j
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
James Anderson
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Quotidiano Piemontese
 
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIEnchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Vladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfObservability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
 
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
 
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
 
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
 
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
 
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfUnlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
 
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIEnchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
 

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

  • 1. Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 7. Technology + Speed Filter: Wireless
  • 10. 10 Day Update Cycle
  • 11. Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 17.
  • 18. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 19.
  • 20. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 21. Mobile Wireless Availability July 2011 Field Tests
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes
  • 25.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage + Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch
  • 30.
  • 31.  
  • 33.
  • 34. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 35.
  • 36. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 37. Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
  • 39.
  • 40. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 41.
  • 42. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 43.