866.429.8889 | 1.954.429.8889 learn.examsoft.com
Thank you for joining.
The webinar will begin shortly.
Using Assessment Data to Engage
Students in Remediation
Sarah B. Zahl, Ph.D.
April 7, 2016
866.429.8889 | 1.954.429.8889 learn.examsoft.com
If you have a question…
Please pose questions to
the presenter through the
“Questions” field of the Go
To Webinar tool on the right
side of your screen.
All questions will be
addressed at the conclusion
of the presentation.
Using Assessment Data to
Engage Students in
Remediation
Sarah B. Zahl, Ph.D.
Director of Educational Assessment
April 7, 2016
Agenda
• MUCOM Brief Overview
• General considerations for remediation
• Tracking outcomes to facilitate remediation
• Remediation structure and support
o Single Assessment Failure
o Course Failure
o Longitudinal understanding of concepts
• Outcomes
• Q&A
MU-COM Overview
• Competency Based Curriculum
• Systems based/integrated curriculum
o Course Director, multiple internal faculty and external
clinicians
o Biomedical topics parallel clinical topics
• iPad exclusive
• Involving key stakeholders in the assessment process
(faculty, students, administrators)
Remediation
• Focus on student learning, not teaching
• Student Level: Self-remediation with or without instructor
involvement
o Ciampa & Revels (2012): Larger gains (and increased retention) when students self-
remediated without help of instructor
• Faculty Level: Intervention from course director, instructor,
advisor
o Hauer, et al. (2009): Ideal model would involve multiple assessments, diagnosis of
problems and development of individualized learning plan, meetings with faculty
including meaningful feedback and reflection, reassessment and confirmation of
competence
• Administrative Level: Multifaceted support interventions
o Student Affairs, counseling services, tutoring, etc.
o Hauer, et al. (2009): Individualized and ongoing support must be part of process
Tracking Learning
Outcomes
• Competencies
• Blueprint for Boards Exams
• System
• Discipline
• Learning Domains
• Course specific outcomes
Remediation: One
Assessment
• Promotes self-remediation and engaging the student
though interaction with course director and advisor
o In some courses, remediation includes an additional exam to show competency
o In other courses, remediation occurs through interaction and discussion
Remediation: Course
Failure
• Category report at the course level, comparison with
class averages
• Immediate review by Student Promotion and Academic
Progress Committee
Remediation: Concepts
• Longitudinal understanding across the curriculum
• Engaging the student in remediation through self-
assessment and interaction with faculty
• Boards Preparation Exams
o Diagnostic exam paired with two year report of performance in all categories
across the curriculum
Remediation: Concepts
• Report of cohort level performance
o Review of concepts for the entire cohort if necessary
Outcomes
• Ongoing opportunities to self-remediate
• Positive feedback from students regarding the utility of
the reports to help prepare for remediation
• Student appreciation of interactions with Student
Progress Committee
• Continuous refinement of remediation processes
Parting Thoughts
• Remediation is a collaborative process
• To support effective remediation, it is important to collect
assessment data across the curriculum
• Students need comprehensive assessment data to self-
remediate
• Remediation data is easily accessible when tracking a
standard set of learning outcomes throughout the
curriculum
Q&A
• Questions?
• Discussion
References
• Ciampa, M. , & Revels, M. (2012). The Effect of Self-Remediation Activities on Undergraduate
Student Retention. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 10 (7).
• Hauer, K.E., et. al (2009). Remediation of the Deficiencies of Physicians Across the Continuum
From Medical School to Practice: A Thematic Review of the Literature. Academic Medicine, 84
(12), 1822-1832.
Contact Info
Sarah B. Zahl, Ph.D.
Marian University
szahl@marian.edu
Innovations in Assessment
• Learn innovative processes in assessment
• Network with colleagues
• Pre-conference workshops with ExamSoft
trainers
• Visit www.assessmentconference.com for
more details

Using Assessment Data to Engage Students in Remediation

  • 1.
    866.429.8889 | 1.954.429.8889learn.examsoft.com Thank you for joining. The webinar will begin shortly. Using Assessment Data to Engage Students in Remediation Sarah B. Zahl, Ph.D. April 7, 2016
  • 2.
    866.429.8889 | 1.954.429.8889learn.examsoft.com If you have a question… Please pose questions to the presenter through the “Questions” field of the Go To Webinar tool on the right side of your screen. All questions will be addressed at the conclusion of the presentation.
  • 3.
    Using Assessment Datato Engage Students in Remediation Sarah B. Zahl, Ph.D. Director of Educational Assessment April 7, 2016
  • 4.
    Agenda • MUCOM BriefOverview • General considerations for remediation • Tracking outcomes to facilitate remediation • Remediation structure and support o Single Assessment Failure o Course Failure o Longitudinal understanding of concepts • Outcomes • Q&A
  • 5.
    MU-COM Overview • CompetencyBased Curriculum • Systems based/integrated curriculum o Course Director, multiple internal faculty and external clinicians o Biomedical topics parallel clinical topics • iPad exclusive • Involving key stakeholders in the assessment process (faculty, students, administrators)
  • 6.
    Remediation • Focus onstudent learning, not teaching • Student Level: Self-remediation with or without instructor involvement o Ciampa & Revels (2012): Larger gains (and increased retention) when students self- remediated without help of instructor • Faculty Level: Intervention from course director, instructor, advisor o Hauer, et al. (2009): Ideal model would involve multiple assessments, diagnosis of problems and development of individualized learning plan, meetings with faculty including meaningful feedback and reflection, reassessment and confirmation of competence • Administrative Level: Multifaceted support interventions o Student Affairs, counseling services, tutoring, etc. o Hauer, et al. (2009): Individualized and ongoing support must be part of process
  • 7.
    Tracking Learning Outcomes • Competencies •Blueprint for Boards Exams • System • Discipline • Learning Domains • Course specific outcomes
  • 8.
    Remediation: One Assessment • Promotesself-remediation and engaging the student though interaction with course director and advisor o In some courses, remediation includes an additional exam to show competency o In other courses, remediation occurs through interaction and discussion
  • 9.
    Remediation: Course Failure • Categoryreport at the course level, comparison with class averages • Immediate review by Student Promotion and Academic Progress Committee
  • 10.
    Remediation: Concepts • Longitudinalunderstanding across the curriculum • Engaging the student in remediation through self- assessment and interaction with faculty • Boards Preparation Exams o Diagnostic exam paired with two year report of performance in all categories across the curriculum
  • 11.
    Remediation: Concepts • Reportof cohort level performance o Review of concepts for the entire cohort if necessary
  • 12.
    Outcomes • Ongoing opportunitiesto self-remediate • Positive feedback from students regarding the utility of the reports to help prepare for remediation • Student appreciation of interactions with Student Progress Committee • Continuous refinement of remediation processes
  • 13.
    Parting Thoughts • Remediationis a collaborative process • To support effective remediation, it is important to collect assessment data across the curriculum • Students need comprehensive assessment data to self- remediate • Remediation data is easily accessible when tracking a standard set of learning outcomes throughout the curriculum
  • 14.
  • 15.
    References • Ciampa, M., & Revels, M. (2012). The Effect of Self-Remediation Activities on Undergraduate Student Retention. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 10 (7). • Hauer, K.E., et. al (2009). Remediation of the Deficiencies of Physicians Across the Continuum From Medical School to Practice: A Thematic Review of the Literature. Academic Medicine, 84 (12), 1822-1832.
  • 16.
    Contact Info Sarah B.Zahl, Ph.D. Marian University szahl@marian.edu
  • 17.
    Innovations in Assessment •Learn innovative processes in assessment • Network with colleagues • Pre-conference workshops with ExamSoft trainers • Visit www.assessmentconference.com for more details

Editor's Notes

  • #5 In this webinar, we will discuss strategies to use assessment data to engage students in the remediation process at various points in the curriculum: -after a student fails an assessment -after a course failure -when a student is struggling with specific concepts across the curriculum