What's the difference between the federal and state court systems? Criminal and civil cases? Constitutional, statutory and administrative law? This brief overview hits the highlights.
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon CtDavid Ford Avon Ct
Created by Article III of the Constitution. Supreme Court is the only Court Created by the Constitution all other federal courts were created by Congress. Chief Justice John Marshall appointed in 1801-1835 did much to increase the power of the Court.
CitationStephen L. Wasby, The Functions and Importance of.docxsleeperharwell
Citation:
Stephen L. Wasby, The Functions and Importance of
Appellate Oral Argument: Some Views of Lawyers and
Federal Judges, 65 Judicature 340 (1982)
Provided by:
University of Washington Law Library
Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline
Thu Oct 4 22:09:34 2018
-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your
acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions
of the license agreement available at
https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
-- The search text of this PDF is generated from
uncorrected OCR text.
-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope
of your HeinOnline license, please use:
Copyright Information
Use QR Code reader to send PDF
to your smartphone or tablet device
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/judica65&collection=journals&id=342&startid=342&endid=355
https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do?operation=go&searchType=0&lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0022-5800
The functions and importance
of appellate oral argument:
some views of lawyers and
federal judges
0
CO.,
0'
z
340 judicature Volume 65. Number 7 February, 1982
%-. M
Although some critics have proposed curtailing or
eliminating oral argument in certain cases,
both judges and lawyers believe
it plays a vital role in the appellate
process, a recent survey shows.
> by Stephen L. Wasby
~ne of the most traditional and im-
portant elements of deciding cases
on appeal is oral argument, an ele-
ment of advocacy older than writ-
lJ ten briefs in this country. Briefs originally were
not required in appeals, and oral argument
J1 continued without time limits even when
briefs were submitted. Eventually briefs did
begin to displace argument: the Supreme Court
first waived oral argument when written argu-
ments were submitted, then mandated briefs
prior to argument, and finally both reserved
argument for the most important cases and
reduced the time granted each party.t
Curtailment of oral argument in other appel-
late courts, partly the result of caseload pres-
sure, has attracted continued attention. Var-
ious sources have warned that eliminating oral
argument in all cases would harm the appel-
late process. 2 Most recently, the Devitt Com-
mittee (the Committee to Consider Standards
for Admission to Practice in the Federal Courts
of the Judicial Conference of the United States)
brought further attention to legal advocacy at
both trial and appellate levels. The "substan-
tially divided" committee, however, made no
recommendations concerning appellate advo-
cacy because it found "the problems presented
... not sufficiently serious to call for the recom-
mending of remedies" 3-at least by compari-
son with trial advocacy, to which the commit-
tee devoted the bulk of its attention. Despite the
Devitt Committee's view, appellate advocacy
remains of considerable importance.
Recent literature shows tension between two.
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
WEEK 5: SUPREME COURT
Lesson
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court
"A law embodies beliefs that have triumphed in the battle of ideas.”
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Expected Outcomes
To understand the evolution of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of power; to appreciate the difference between the “original intent” and “judicial activist” philosophies; and to critically evaluate the political and cultural importance of major Supreme Court decisions.
Overview
I. The Legal Framework
Most American laws are based on the English legal system. The body of judge-made law is referred to as common law. The U.S. Constitution, State Constitutions and statutes - laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures - are sources upon which American law is founded. Common law countries around the world include: United States; Britain, Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand.
The United States utilizes a dual court system which is comprised of both State and Federal Courts. The rules and principles which are the basis of court decisions are referred to as Case Law. Case law has bearing on future cases that involve similar facts and constitutional issues. The case law or court rule from previous cases establishes the precedents on which future cases will be relied upon in the decision making process. The doctrine of stare decisis means to stand on the decided cases.
A courts authority to hear and decide cases refers to the jurisdiction of the court. According to the Constitution, the accused must receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. Federal Courts have jurisdiction when there is a federal question in the case, when there is diversity of citizenship involved in the case (meaning citizens from different states), and when there are two or more different states or state boundaries involved. When a case is to be heard in Federal Court, courts with limited jurisdiction include Tax and Bankruptcy Courts. These are examples of courts that deal with very specialized issues that do not deal with constitutional issues, but other federal issues.
II. The Judicial Powers
According to Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power of the United States would be vested in one Supreme Court. The actual authority of the Supreme Court was described as:
· “The Judicial power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizen ...
What's the difference between the federal and state court systems? Criminal and civil cases? Constitutional, statutory and administrative law? This brief overview hits the highlights.
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon CtDavid Ford Avon Ct
Created by Article III of the Constitution. Supreme Court is the only Court Created by the Constitution all other federal courts were created by Congress. Chief Justice John Marshall appointed in 1801-1835 did much to increase the power of the Court.
CitationStephen L. Wasby, The Functions and Importance of.docxsleeperharwell
Citation:
Stephen L. Wasby, The Functions and Importance of
Appellate Oral Argument: Some Views of Lawyers and
Federal Judges, 65 Judicature 340 (1982)
Provided by:
University of Washington Law Library
Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline
Thu Oct 4 22:09:34 2018
-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your
acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions
of the license agreement available at
https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
-- The search text of this PDF is generated from
uncorrected OCR text.
-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope
of your HeinOnline license, please use:
Copyright Information
Use QR Code reader to send PDF
to your smartphone or tablet device
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/judica65&collection=journals&id=342&startid=342&endid=355
https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do?operation=go&searchType=0&lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0022-5800
The functions and importance
of appellate oral argument:
some views of lawyers and
federal judges
0
CO.,
0'
z
340 judicature Volume 65. Number 7 February, 1982
%-. M
Although some critics have proposed curtailing or
eliminating oral argument in certain cases,
both judges and lawyers believe
it plays a vital role in the appellate
process, a recent survey shows.
> by Stephen L. Wasby
~ne of the most traditional and im-
portant elements of deciding cases
on appeal is oral argument, an ele-
ment of advocacy older than writ-
lJ ten briefs in this country. Briefs originally were
not required in appeals, and oral argument
J1 continued without time limits even when
briefs were submitted. Eventually briefs did
begin to displace argument: the Supreme Court
first waived oral argument when written argu-
ments were submitted, then mandated briefs
prior to argument, and finally both reserved
argument for the most important cases and
reduced the time granted each party.t
Curtailment of oral argument in other appel-
late courts, partly the result of caseload pres-
sure, has attracted continued attention. Var-
ious sources have warned that eliminating oral
argument in all cases would harm the appel-
late process. 2 Most recently, the Devitt Com-
mittee (the Committee to Consider Standards
for Admission to Practice in the Federal Courts
of the Judicial Conference of the United States)
brought further attention to legal advocacy at
both trial and appellate levels. The "substan-
tially divided" committee, however, made no
recommendations concerning appellate advo-
cacy because it found "the problems presented
... not sufficiently serious to call for the recom-
mending of remedies" 3-at least by compari-
son with trial advocacy, to which the commit-
tee devoted the bulk of its attention. Despite the
Devitt Committee's view, appellate advocacy
remains of considerable importance.
Recent literature shows tension between two.
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
WEEK 5: SUPREME COURT
Lesson
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court
"A law embodies beliefs that have triumphed in the battle of ideas.”
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Expected Outcomes
To understand the evolution of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of power; to appreciate the difference between the “original intent” and “judicial activist” philosophies; and to critically evaluate the political and cultural importance of major Supreme Court decisions.
Overview
I. The Legal Framework
Most American laws are based on the English legal system. The body of judge-made law is referred to as common law. The U.S. Constitution, State Constitutions and statutes - laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures - are sources upon which American law is founded. Common law countries around the world include: United States; Britain, Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand.
The United States utilizes a dual court system which is comprised of both State and Federal Courts. The rules and principles which are the basis of court decisions are referred to as Case Law. Case law has bearing on future cases that involve similar facts and constitutional issues. The case law or court rule from previous cases establishes the precedents on which future cases will be relied upon in the decision making process. The doctrine of stare decisis means to stand on the decided cases.
A courts authority to hear and decide cases refers to the jurisdiction of the court. According to the Constitution, the accused must receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. Federal Courts have jurisdiction when there is a federal question in the case, when there is diversity of citizenship involved in the case (meaning citizens from different states), and when there are two or more different states or state boundaries involved. When a case is to be heard in Federal Court, courts with limited jurisdiction include Tax and Bankruptcy Courts. These are examples of courts that deal with very specialized issues that do not deal with constitutional issues, but other federal issues.
II. The Judicial Powers
According to Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power of the United States would be vested in one Supreme Court. The actual authority of the Supreme Court was described as:
· “The Judicial power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizen ...
Hey guys, this is the PowerPoint that Kate and I presented on 10/25/18. Chapter 7: The Courts for Professor Riley's class, Intro to Criminal Justice at NCC.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024.pdfthesiliconleaders
In the recent edition, The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024, The Silicon Leaders magazine gladly features Dejan Štancer, President of the Global Chamber of Business Leaders (GCBL), along with other leaders.
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
buy old yahoo accounts buy yahoo accountsSusan Laney
As a business owner, I understand the importance of having a strong online presence and leveraging various digital platforms to reach and engage with your target audience. One often overlooked yet highly valuable asset in this regard is the humble Yahoo account. While many may perceive Yahoo as a relic of the past, the truth is that these accounts still hold immense potential for businesses of all sizes.
FIA officials brutally tortured innocent and snatched 200 Bitcoins of worth 4...jamalseoexpert1978
Farman Ayaz Khattak and Ehtesham Matloob are government officials in CTW Counter terrorism wing Islamabad, in Federal Investigation Agency FIA Headquarters. CTW and FIA kidnapped crypto currency owner from Islamabad and snatched 200 Bitcoins those worth of 4 billion rupees in Pakistan currency. There is not Cryptocurrency Regulations in Pakistan & CTW is official dacoit and stealing digital assets from the innocent crypto holders and making fake cases of terrorism to keep them silent.
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxJeremyPeirce1
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
Tata Group Dials Taiwan for Its Chipmaking Ambition in Gujarat’s DholeraAvirahi City Dholera
The Tata Group, a titan of Indian industry, is making waves with its advanced talks with Taiwanese chipmakers Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC) and UMC Group. The goal? Establishing a cutting-edge semiconductor fabrication unit (fab) in Dholera, Gujarat. This isn’t just any project; it’s a potential game changer for India’s chipmaking aspirations and a boon for investors seeking promising residential projects in dholera sir.
Visit : https://www.avirahi.com/blog/tata-group-dials-taiwan-for-its-chipmaking-ambition-in-gujarats-dholera/
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
U.S. Court of Appeals
1. test wiki blog
Tags
Edited Today at 4:47 AM by Unauthenticated User…
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is a U.S. federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the
district courts in the following districts:
• District of Alaska
• District of Arizona
• Central District of California
• Eastern District of California
• Northern District of California
• Southern District of California
• District of Hawaii
• District of Idaho
• District of Montana
• District of Nevada
• District of Oregon
• Eastern District of Washington
• Western District of Washington
It also has appellate jurisdiction over the following territorial courts:
• District Court of Guam
• District of the Northern Mariana Islands
Headquartered in San Francisco, California, the Ninth Circuit is by far the largest of the thirteen courts of appeals, with 29 active judgeships.
The court's regular meeting places are Seattle at the William K. Nakamura Courthouse, Portland at the Pioneer Courthouse, San Francisco at
the James R. Browning U.S. Court of Appeals Building, and Pasadena at the Richard H. Chambers U.S. Court of Appeals, but panels of the
court occasionally travel to hear cases in other locations within its territorial jurisdiction. Although the judges travel around the circuit, the court
arranges its hearings so that cases from the northern region of the circuit are heard in Seattle or Portland, cases from southern California are
heard in Pasadena, and cases from northern California, Nevada, Arizona, and Hawaii are heard in San Francisco. For lawyers who must come
and present their cases to the court in person, this administrative grouping of cases helps to reduce the time and cost of travel.
The large size of the current court is due to the fact that both the population of the western states and the geographic jurisdiction of the Ninth
Circuit have increased dramatically since Congress, in 1891, created the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The court was
originally granted appellate jurisdiction over federal district courts in California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. As new
states and territories were added to the federal judicial hierarchy in the twentieth century, many of those in the West were placed in the Ninth
Circuit: the newly acquired territory of Hawaii in 1900, Arizona upon its accession to statehood in 1912, the then-territory of Alaska in 1948,
Guam in 1951, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) in 1977. In 1979, the Ninth Circuit became the first federal
judicial circuit to set up a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The cultural and political jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit is just as varied as the land
within its geographical borders. In a dissenting opinion in a rights of publicity case involving Wheel of Fortune star Vanna White, Circuit Judge
Alex Kozinski sardonically noted that "[f]or better or worse, we are the Court of Appeals for the Hollywood Circuit." Judges from more remote
parts of the circuit note the contrast between legal issues confronted by populous states such as California and those confronted by rural
states such as Alaska, Idaho, and Montana. Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld, who maintains his chambers in Fairbanks, Alaska, wrote in a 1998
letter: "Much federal law is not national in scope…. It is easy to make a mistake construing these laws when unfamiliar with them, as we often
are, or not interpreting them regularly, as we never do." To find an attorney please check the largest attorney directory online or to find an
california attorney search please check the largest california attorney search directory online or to find an unemployment attorney please
check the largest unemployment attorney directory online or to find an juvenile attorney please check the largest juvenile attorney directory
online.
Controversy
Alleged political liberalism: According to the most current count, the Ninth Circuit has the highest percentage of active judges appointed by
Democratic presidents, with 59%. Until 2003, this percentage was much higher; a political stalemate over judicial nominations subsequently
http://web2.ignatius.vic.edu.au/groups/test/wiki/33068c/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.html Page 1 / 2
2. kept several vacancies on the court for several years. Nevertheless, such a percentage is not extreme in relation to the other Circuits; eight
Circuits have partisan appointment ratios that are more skewed than the Ninth's. Critics try to explain the court's perceived liberal bias by
reference to its relatively high proportion of Democratic appointees. Others have contested that the Circuit's high percentage of reversals is
accounted for by the fact that the Ninth Circuit hears more cases than any other Circuit
Size of the court: Many scholars and jurists cite regional differences between states in the circuit, as well as the practical, procedural, and
substantive difficulties in administering a court of this size, as reasons why Congress should split the Ninth Circuit into two or more smaller
circuit courts. Opponents of such a move claim that the court is functioning smoothly from an administrative standpoint, and that the real
problem is not that the circuit is too large, but that Congress has not created enough judgeships to handle the court's workload. Opponents
also point out that over half of the Ninth Circuit's cases come from the state of California, and thus dividing the Circuit would result in whichever
portion included California being dominated by cases from a single state. Moreover, many who advocate the preservation of the current Ninth
Circuit see politics as a motivating factor in the split movement. They claim that by implementing a scheme that isolates California from the
other states in the circuit, the effect of a split will be to dilute the power of judges who have handed down rulings that have angered social
conservatives.
In addition to concerns over its legal doctrine, critics of the Ninth Circuit claim there are several adverse consequences of its large size. Chief
among these is the Ninth Circuit's unique rules concerning the composition of an en banc court. In other circuits, en banc courts are
composed of all active circuit judges, plus (depending on the rules of the particular court) any senior judges who took part in the original panel
decision. By contrast, in the Ninth Circuit it is impractical for twenty-eight or more judges to take part in a single oral argument and deliberate
on a decision en masse. The court thus provides for a “limited en banc” review of a randomly-selected 11 judge panel. This means that en
banc reviews may not actually reflect the views of the majority of the court, and indeed may not include any of the three judges involved in the
decision being reviewed in the first place. The result, according to detractors, is a high risk of intracircuit conflicts of law where different
groupings of judges end up delivering contradictory opinions. This is said to cause uncertainty in the district courts and within the bar.
Comments
My Page Log In Help
http://web2.ignatius.vic.edu.au/groups/test/wiki/33068c/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.html Page 2 / 2