SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Judicial Branch
Key Words
• Concurrent Jurisdiction
• Original Jurisdiction
• Appellate Jurisdiction
• Litigant
• Due Process Clause
• Grand Jury
• Indictment
• Petit Jury
• Judicial Circuit
• Senatorial Courtesy
• Riding the Circuit
• Opinion
• Writ of Certiorari
• Per Curium
• Opinion
• Brief
• Amicus Curiae
• Majority Opinion
• Dissenting Opinion
Key Words
• Judicial Review
• Impound
• Stare Decisis
• Precedent
• Advisory Opinion
• Bloc
• Swing Vote
• civil law
• contract
• expressed contract
• implied contract
• real property
• law
• constitutional law
• statute
• ordinance
• statutory law
• administrative law
• common law
• equity
• due process
• substantive due process
• procedural due process
• adversary system
• presumed innocence
• personal property
• mortgage
• tort
• plaintiff
• Defendant
• injunction
• complaint
• summons
• answer
• discovery
• mediation
• affidavit
• criminal law
• criminal justice system
• petty offense
• misdemeanor
• felony
• arrest warrant
• grand jury
• indictment
• information
• plea bargaining
• jury, verdict
• hung jury
• sentence
Objectives
1. Explain the Jurisdiction of the different courts
2. Analyze important Supreme Court Cases
3. Compare and Contrast the differences between
a District Court and an Appellate Court
4. Evaluate the different ways why someone is
choosing as a Federal Judge
5. List the 9 Supreme Court Justices
6. Describe the characteristics of a Supreme Court
Justice
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Chapter 11
POWERS OF THE FEDERAL COURTS
Section One
History of Branch
• The Supreme Court
played a minor role
until Chief Justice John
Marshall (1801-1835).
• His leadership helped to
increase the power of
the Court
Jurisdiction of the Courts
Definition:
• The authority or subject
area that a court can hear
a case about.
• Example: Break a federal
law, go to a federal court
(robbing a bank).
• Example: Break a state
law, go to a state court
(speeding).
Powers of the Federal Court System
Federal Courts
1. Federal Law
2. Treaties with foreign nations
3. Bankruptcy
4. Admiralty or maritime law
5. Foreign diplomats or foreign
governments
6. Two or more state governments
7. The United States government
8. Citizens of different states
9. A state and a citizen of a different
state
10. Land grant claims of different
states
Supreme Court Power:
1. Interpret the Constitution
2. Determine the
constitutionality of state
laws
3. Uphold regulatory laws
4. Protect civil liberties
5. Influence public policy
Types of Jurisdiction
• Concurrent– cases can be tried in either federal or state court.
• A common type of concurrent jurisdiction: is “Diverse
Citizenship” –dispute involving citizens of different states.
• Federal District Courts may hear these if over $75,000 is
involved.
• Defendant can have the trial moved from the Plaintiff’s state to
a federal district court.
• Example: Land dispute between people from different states.
Types of Jurisdiction
Original– court with the
authority to be the 1st
to hear a case
Usually found within
District courts and are trial
courts, where original
jurisdiction takes place,
trails are held, and juries
may be impaneled.
US
Supreme Court
9 Justices
D.C.
Original and appellate
Fewest cases
80-150/year
US Court of Appeals
12 Courts (3 judge panel)
Appellate
US District Court
94 Courts (judge and 2 types of juries:
1. grand - indicts
2. petit - determines guilty or innocence)
Original
Most cases
Marbury V. Madison
• Created the concept of
“judicial review” which
allows the Supreme
Court to declare the
actions or Acts of
Congress as
unconstitutional
• 9-0, Chief Justice John
Marshall
• Without this ruling, a
Supreme Court and
some say Checks and
Balances do not exist…
LOWER FEDERAL COURTS
Section Two
Federal District Courts
• Created by Congress in
1789 to serve as trail
courts
• 94 district courts; with
646 judges
• 2 Judges per district
• Usually preside alone
• Handle over 300,000
cases
Examples:
• Bank robbery
• Mail fraud
• Counterfeiting
• Tax evasion
• Bankruptcy
• Civil rights
Federal Court of Appeals
• Created by Congress in 1891, 3
judge panel
• Relieves the Supreme Court of
burden of hearing all appeals
• Currently 13 courts of appeals: 12
judicial circuits (regions) and 1
for national jurisdiction
• 179 circuit judges, 55,000 cases a
year
• May uphold, overrule, or
modify the decision being
appealed
• No trail, no testimony of
witnesses, panel of judges is
looking for errors in procedure
of law
U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS
Legislative Courts/Special Courts
1. US Court of Federal Claims (you suing the federal government)
2. Territorial Courts (land owned by U.S. like Guam)
3. Courts of the District of Columbia (court for people in D.C.)
4. US Tax Court (any violation of federal tax laws)
5. US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces (military has own set of laws,
so they need their own court – appeals from JAG)
6. US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (if a veteran loses a service,
this is where they appeal their case – like Agent Orange cases)
7. Court of International Trade- Civil cases arising out of tariff and
other trade-related laws
APPOINTING JUDGES
Article II, Section II, Clause
II – Supreme Court
appointment process:
Says that “the President
shall nominate and by
and with the advice and
consent of the Senate
shall appoint…Judges of
the Supreme Court.”
THE SUPREME COURT
Section Three
Introduction
• Supreme Court is the
ultimate court of
appeals in the United
States.
• They are the the final
authority in any case
involving the
Constitution, acts of
Congress, and treaties
with other nations
Introduction Cont.
• Their power to hear a case is
discretionary, no required to
hear all cases
• If they chose to not hear a
case, they do not have to give
any rationale for why they
have chosen not to hear the
case…but sometimes they do.
• Until 1891, justices spent
much of their time riding the
circuit, or traveling to hold
court in their assigned regions
of the country.
Supreme Court Jurisdiction
• Has both original and
appellate jurisdiction
• Article 3, Section 2 sets
courts original
jurisdiction and covers
two types of cases:
1. Representation of
foreign government
2. State is a party.
Session
• First Monday of October
each year and usually
continues in session
through June.
• Receives and disposes of
approximately 5-9,000
cases a year.
• Cases are heard with all the
Justices sitting together in
open court.
• Each year the Supreme
Court hears about 150
cases of national
importance and 3/4ths of
such decisions are
announced in full published
opinions.
Term and Salary
For Constitutional Courts their
term is LIFE
• Until judge resigns, retires,
or dies
• Can be removed through
impeachment (13
impeached, 7 of them
removed)
• Salary is same and set by
Congress and can not be
decreased during their term
in office.
Justices and their Duties
• His/her main duty is
hear and rule on cases
1. Deciding which cases
to hear
2. Deciding the case
itself
3. Determining an
explanation for the
decision, called the
Court’s opinion
U.S. Supreme Court Justices
• Chief Justice
• Born in 1955
• J.D. Harvard Law
• U.S. Court of Appeals
for DC in 2003 (GWB)
• George W. Bush
nominated him C.J in
2005 [78-22]
• Roman Catholic
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1950
• J.D. Yale
• U.S. Court of Appeals
3rd Circuit in 1990
(GHWB)
• George W. Bush
nominated in 2006
[58-42]
• Roman Catholic
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1938
• LL.B. Harvard
• U.S. Court of Appeals
D.C. in 1980 (Carter)
• Bill Clinton nominated
him in 1994 [87-9]
• Jewish
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1948
• J.D. Yale
• U.S. Court of Appeals
D.C. in 1980 (GHWB)
• George H.W. Bush
nominated him in
1991 [52-48]
• Roman Catholic
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1936
• LL.B Harvard
• U.S. Court of Appeals
9th Circuit in 1975
(Ford)
• Ronald Reagan
nominated him in
1988 [97-0]
• Roman Catholic
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1933
• LL.B Columbia
• U.S. Court of Appeals
D.C. in 1980 (Carter)
• Bill Clinton nominated
her in 1993 [96-3]
• Jewish
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1954
• J.D. Yale
• U.S Court of Appeals
2nd Circuit in 1998
(Clinton)
• Barack Obama
nominated her in
2009 [68-31]
• Roman Catholic
• Associate Justice
• Born in 1960
• J.D. Harvard
• U.S. Court of Appeals
(expired)
• Solicitor General
represents U.S.
Government
• Obama nominated
her in 2010 [63-37]
• Jewish
IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT CASE
Marbury v. Madison 1803
• ” Created the concept
of “judicial review
which allows the
Supreme Court to
declare the actions or
Acts of Congress as
unconstitutional
• 9-0, Chief Justice
John Marshall
• Without this ruling, a
Supreme Court and
some say Checks and
Balances do not
exist…
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896
• Established the
“separate but equal”
doctrine making public
segregation of Blacks
and Whites legal. [8-1]
• If facilities for both races
were equal, they could
be separate.
• Impact-
• Legalized separation of
everything
• Schools, public buildings,
hotels, etc.
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966)
In Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) the issue of police
interrogation and rights of the accused came to
the forefront. The Supreme Court addressed four
similar cases at once. In all cases, the defendant
was questioned in a room cut off from the rest of
the world under intense pressure and other
uncomfortable circumstances. In all four cases,
the defendants admitted to the crime, and in
three of the cases the defendants signed written
confessions that were used as evidence in their
respective trials. In the case of Miranda, his
confession led to a conviction for kidnapping and
rape and 20-30 years in prison for each count.
Here is the question facing the court
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966)
In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled in favor of
Miranda, saying that Miranda’s constitutional
rights under the Fifth Amendment were violated
in obtaining the confession. The majority
decision felt that, since the police pressured him
into a confession without Miranda knowing his
rights, the confession should not have been
admissible as evidence in his trial. Furthermore,
the court felt that a defendant “must be warned
prior to any questioning that he has [rights]”.
These rights include the right to remain silent,
right to an attorney, and so on. This new policy
is known as reading a suspect their “Miranda
Rights”. Miranda had a retrial without the
confession included as evidence and was
convicted again anyway.
You have the right
to remain silent…
Anything you say
can and will be
used against you in
a court of law…
You have the right
to an attorney… If
you cannot afford
an attorney, one
will be appointed
for you prior to
any questioning if
you so desire.
Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)
The Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) is
arguably one of the top three most
important and most famous cases in U.S.
History. At issue was the constitutionality of
segregation, a topic that the Supreme Court
already decided in 1896 (Plessy v. Ferguson).
Oliver Brown was one of 13 parents who
filed a class action lawsuit against the Board
of Education of Topeka Kansas. Their 20
children (collectively) were all African-
American and forced to attend the
segregated school about a mile away when
there was a white only school just blocks
from their homes.
In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the Earl Warren
Court overturned Plessy v. Ferguson from 58
years earlier and found that state-sponsored
segregation was unconstitutional. The
“separate but equal” policy that was earlier
ruled to have upheld the equal rights clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment could never
truly be offer equal accommodations to
blacks, ruled the court. The court decided,
but had little to no power in carrying out the
eradication of Jim Crow (segregation) Laws.
This decision allowed for the Rosa Parks
arrest to play out as it did (1955) and was one
of many catalysts for the Modern Civil Rights
Movement.
Who were the justices of the supreme
court?
Earl Warren (Chief Justice)
Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson
Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark
Sherman Minton
Earl Warren
Who were the justices of the supreme
court?
Earl Warren (Chief Justice)
MAJORITY
Hugo Black MAJORITY
Stanley F. Reed MAJORITY
Felix Frankfurter MAJORITY
William O. Douglas MAJORITY
Robert H. Jackson MAJORITY
Harold H. Burton MAJORITY
Tom C. Clark MAJORITY
Sherman Minton MAJORITY
Earl Warren
Roe v. Wade 1972
• Legalized the right of
women to an abortion
under certain
circumstances. States
were allowed to regulate
in later trimesters.
“Viability” is the
determining factor.
• Chief Justice Warren
Burger [5-4]
• Impact-
• Pro-Life
• Pro-Choice
• Mother’s rights v.
Child/Fetus’ rights
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
• Dealing with the regulation
of campaign spending by
organizations.
• The United States Supreme
Court held that the First
Amendment prohibited the
government from
restricting independent
political expenditures by a
nonprofit corporation.
Mapp V. Ohio
• Evidence obtained in
violation of the Fourth
Amendment, which
protects against
"unreasonable searches
and seizures," may not
be used in state law
criminal prosecutions in
state courts,
Gideon v. Wainwright
• states are required
under the Fourteenth
Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution to provide
counsel in criminal
cases to represent
defendants who are
unable to afford to pay
their own attorneys.
Lloyd Corp, Ltd. V. Tanner
• was a United States
Supreme Court case
concerning free speech
rights on private
property.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
• held that public school
curricular student
newspapers that have
not been established as
forums for student
expression are subject
to a lower level of First
Amendment protection.
Engle v.
Vitale,
(1962)
In Engle v. Vitale, (1962) the issue of
mandatory prayer in public school was
addressed. In this case, a New York state
law required public schools to start each
day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a
nondenominational prayer that mentioned
a dependence on an “Almighty God”. It was
mandatory for schools to do it each day,
but not necessarily mandatory for students
to participate (students had the option not
to participate if they objected. A parent
(Engel) sued the state, arguing that the law
violated the establishment clause of the
first amendment. The question at hand
was straightforward. Can a public school
open the school day with a prayer?
Engle v.
Vitale,
(1962)Text from the First Amendment…
“Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press;
or the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of
grievances.”
In an 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court sided
with Engel (the parent), agreeing that the use
of prayer to open the school day was a
violation of the Establishment Clause of the
First Amendment. The clause states,
“Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof”. The majority (the
judges who ruled in favor of Engel) said that,
even though students could choose non-
participation, the purpose of the
Establishment Clause was to keep
government from interfering with religion.
Even though most Americans believed it God
at the time, this was promoting certain belief
systems over others, and therefore
unconstitutional.
Who were the justices of the supreme court?
Earl Warren (Chief Justice)
Hugo Black
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan, Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Earl Warren
Who were the justices of the supreme
court?
Earl Warren (Chief Justice)
MAJORITY
Hugo Black MAJORITY
Felix Frankfurter MAJORITY
William O. Douglas CONCURRENCE
Tom C. Clark MAJORITY
John M. Harlan II MAJORITY
William J. Brennan, Jr. MAJORITY
Potter Stewart DISSENT
Byron White MAJORITY
Earl Warren
New Jersey v. T.L.O., (1985)
In New Jersey v. T.L.O, (1985) a decision was
made regarding the constitutionality of
searching students in public high schools. In
this case, T.L.O. was found in possession of
cigarettes after being caught smoking in the
bathroom and brought to the office. In the
searching of her purse, she was also found in
possession of marijuana and other drug
paraphernalia. Here was the big question.
Where is the line between a child’s Fourth
Amendment right to privacy and a school’s
right to maintain order and a drug-free
environment? And here was the specific
question facing the court.
In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled in favor of
New Jersey, agreeing that the search was
reasonable and did not violate T.L.O.’s Fourth
Amendment right protecting against illegal
search and seizure. The majority wrote that
the principal had reasonable suspicion that a
school rule may have been broken by her
being caught smoking in the bathroom,
therefore it was reasonable for him to search
the contents of her purse. While searching the
purse, more incriminating evidence was in
plain view, therefore no “warrant” (as
prescribed in the Fourth Amendment) was
necessary. This ruling has guided
administrators around the country in
performing legal searches and maintaining
order on campuses.
SUPREME COURT DECISION
MAKING
Chapter 12
The Court’s Procedures
During two week sessions,
justices hear oral
arguments
The justices consider
arguments in cases they
have heard and petitions
from plaintiffs and then
write opinions for cases
they have decided.
Justices’ written opinions
interpret the law and help
shape public policy.
Opinion-written
statement on a cases they
have already decided.
Selecting Cases
• “Rule of Four”- only
four of nine justices
need to agree to hear a
case
Chapter 12: Steps in
Deciding Major Cases
The Court’s Procedures
The justices listen to oral
arguments by lawyers on each
side of the cases before them.
Later they announce their
opinions on cases they have
heard. The Court hears oral
arguments from Monday through
Wednesday. On Wednesdays and
Fridays the justices meet in secret
conferences to decide cases.
opinions—written statements on
cases they have already decided.
How Cases Reach the Court
The main route to the
Supreme Court is by a writ of
certiorari an order from the
Court to a lower court to send
up the records on a case for
review. The party seeking
review petitions the Court for
certiorari and must argue
either that the lower court
made a legal error in handling
the case or that the case raises
a significant constitutional
issue.
The Solicitor General
Close to half of the cases
decided by the Supreme
Court involve the federal
government in the suit.
The solicitor general is
appointed by the
president and represents
the federal government
before the Supreme
Court.
Step One: Submitting Briefs
• Brief- written
statement setting
forth the legal
arguments, relevant
facts, and precedents
supporting one side of
a case
Selecting Cases
When the justices accept a
case, they also decide whether
to ask for more information
from the opposing lawyers or
to rule quickly on the basis of
written materials already
available. If the Court rules
without consulting new
information, the ruling may be
announced with a per curiam.
a brief, unsigned statement of
the Court’s decision.
Step 2: Oral Arguments
• After briefs lawyers
from each side present
oral arguments before
the court Monday-
Wednesday
• They usually last 30
minutes
Step Three: The Conference
• Justices meet
Wednesday and Fridays
• A tradition is they shake
hands
• The conference
meetings are secret
• A majority must be in
agreement to decide a
case, and at least 6
must be present.
Step Four: Writing the Opinion
• States the facts of the
case, announces the
Court’s ruling, and
explains its reasoning in
reaching the decision
1. Unanimous- all justices
vote the same way.
2. Majority- expresses the
views of the majority of
the justices on a case
3. Concurring- Agree with
majority’s decision but
have a different reason
why
4. Dissenting- opinion of
justices on the losing
side in a case
INFLUENCING COURT DECISIONS
Section Three
Factors of Influence
1. Existing Laws
2. Personal views of the
justices
3. The justices’
interactions with one
another
4. Social forces and
public attitudes
5. Congress and the
President
• Law is the foundation
for deciding a case.
Bloc- coalition of justices,
exist on the Court on
certain kinds of issues.
Swing votes-the deciding vote
LEGAL TERMS
Judicial Branch
Plaintiff
The person(s) bring a case
forward for the courts to
review.
Defendant
The person(s) that the case is
being brought against
Verdict
Acquittal a judgment that a
person is not guilty of the
crime with which the person
has been charged.
Conviction a formal
declaration that someone is
guilty of a criminal offense,
made by the verdict of a jury
or the decision of a judge in
a court of law.
Double Jeopardy
• forbids a defendant
from being tried again
on the same (or similar)
charges following a
legitimate acquittal or
conviction.
Bail
• Money paid to get a
person out of jail while
on trial.
Symbolic Speech
• law used to describe
actions that
purposefully and
discernibly convey a
particular message or
statement to those
viewing it.
Establishment Clause
• The U.S. cannot have an
official religion
Countries with Official
Religion
1. Costa Rica
2. Most of the Middle
East
3. Thailand
4. Israel
Not Protected
• Obscenity
• Fighting words
• Defamation
• Child pornography
• Perjury
• Blackmail
• Incitement to imminent
lawless action
• True threats
• Solicitations to commit
crimes

More Related Content

What's hot

Dual court system
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court system
Mark Lushenko
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
stjohnsguam
 
American Legal System (15.2&3)
American Legal System (15.2&3)American Legal System (15.2&3)
American Legal System (15.2&3)
Matthew Caggia
 
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
Burns & Farrey
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtssevans-idaho
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchdficker
 
Federal judiciary
Federal judiciaryFederal judiciary
Federal judiciary
wphaneuf
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
lisajurs
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchmtaft
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branch Judicial branch
Judicial branch
Lindsey Maria
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch
jtoma84
 
The American Legal System
The American Legal SystemThe American Legal System
The American Legal System
Dan Kennedy
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroMelissa
 
Fed cts what they do
Fed cts what they doFed cts what they do
Fed cts what they dosevans-idaho
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchDan Hess
 

What's hot (17)

Case law project
Case law projectCase law project
Case law project
 
Dual court system
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court system
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
American Legal System (15.2&3)
American Legal System (15.2&3)American Legal System (15.2&3)
American Legal System (15.2&3)
 
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
Burns & Farrey Presents “Federal Courts of New England: The Essentials”
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courts
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
Federal judiciary
Federal judiciaryFederal judiciary
Federal judiciary
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branch Judicial branch
Judicial branch
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch
 
The American Legal System
The American Legal SystemThe American Legal System
The American Legal System
 
Rinehart LR Final
Rinehart LR FinalRinehart LR Final
Rinehart LR Final
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch Intro
 
Fed cts what they do
Fed cts what they doFed cts what they do
Fed cts what they do
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 

Similar to The Judicial Branch

The federal court_system
The federal court_systemThe federal court_system
The federal court_system
cheid
 
Federal court system lecture
Federal court system lectureFederal court system lecture
Federal court system lecture
EthosDebate
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branchJudicial branch
Judicial brancheschott
 
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
mckenziewood
 
Ch 05 the court system class ppt
Ch 05 the court system class pptCh 05 the court system class ppt
Ch 05 the court system class ppt
sjh94
 
United States Supreme Court
United States Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme Court
United States Supreme Court
UD Teacher
 
Elements_of_Law.pdf
Elements_of_Law.pdfElements_of_Law.pdf
Elements_of_Law.pdf
acjimenezt
 
Chapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courtsChapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courts
krich28
 
Ch 5 the court system
Ch 5 the court systemCh 5 the court system
Ch 5 the court systemCynthia Ryan
 
Chapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courtsChapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courts
krich28
 
Judicial review
Judicial reviewJudicial review
Judicial reviewshoetzlein
 
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1Stuart N. Brotman
 
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_student
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_studentChapter 2 the_legal_system_student
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_studentmclayton09
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008Christopher Rice
 
US Court System.pptx
US  Court System.pptxUS  Court System.pptx
US Court System.pptx
TimTim901541
 
The us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtThe us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtpjosephchs
 
Federal Judicial Resources
Federal Judicial ResourcesFederal Judicial Resources
Federal Judicial Resources
suzanne1111
 
Federal and State Courts
Federal and State CourtsFederal and State Courts
Federal and State Courts
Katy Hreha
 

Similar to The Judicial Branch (20)

The federal court_system
The federal court_systemThe federal court_system
The federal court_system
 
Federal courts
Federal courtsFederal courts
Federal courts
 
Federal court system lecture
Federal court system lectureFederal court system lecture
Federal court system lecture
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branchJudicial branch
Judicial branch
 
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
 
Ch 05 the court system class ppt
Ch 05 the court system class pptCh 05 the court system class ppt
Ch 05 the court system class ppt
 
United States Supreme Court
United States Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme Court
United States Supreme Court
 
Elements_of_Law.pdf
Elements_of_Law.pdfElements_of_Law.pdf
Elements_of_Law.pdf
 
Chapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courtsChapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courts
 
Ch 5 the court system
Ch 5 the court systemCh 5 the court system
Ch 5 the court system
 
Chapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courtsChapter 18—federal courts
Chapter 18—federal courts
 
Judicial review
Judicial reviewJudicial review
Judicial review
 
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1
Justice system-lop-sp09-1231807181806271-3-1
 
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_student
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_studentChapter 2 the_legal_system_student
Chapter 2 the_legal_system_student
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
 
US Court System.pptx
US  Court System.pptxUS  Court System.pptx
US Court System.pptx
 
The us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtThe us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme court
 
Federal Judicial Resources
Federal Judicial ResourcesFederal Judicial Resources
Federal Judicial Resources
 
Federal and State Courts
Federal and State CourtsFederal and State Courts
Federal and State Courts
 
The Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemThe Federal Court System
The Federal Court System
 

More from bminus

Missouri
Missouri Missouri
Missouri
bminus
 
Economics
EconomicsEconomics
Economics
bminus
 
State and Local
State and LocalState and Local
State and Local
bminus
 
Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Sixteen Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Sixteen
bminus
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branch
bminus
 
Chapter Five
Chapter FiveChapter Five
Chapter Five
bminus
 
Chapter Three and Four
Chapter Three and FourChapter Three and Four
Chapter Three and Four
bminus
 
Chapter Two
Chapter TwoChapter Two
Chapter Two
bminus
 
Chapter One
Chapter One Chapter One
Chapter One
bminus
 

More from bminus (9)

Missouri
Missouri Missouri
Missouri
 
Economics
EconomicsEconomics
Economics
 
State and Local
State and LocalState and Local
State and Local
 
Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Sixteen Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Sixteen
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branch
 
Chapter Five
Chapter FiveChapter Five
Chapter Five
 
Chapter Three and Four
Chapter Three and FourChapter Three and Four
Chapter Three and Four
 
Chapter Two
Chapter TwoChapter Two
Chapter Two
 
Chapter One
Chapter One Chapter One
Chapter One
 

Recently uploaded

MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptxMHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
ILC- UK
 
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdfNHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
AjayVejendla3
 
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Congressional Budget Office
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
ukyewh
 
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxWhat is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
Paul Smith
 
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenUnderstanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
SERUDS INDIA
 
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 362024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
JSchaus & Associates
 
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
Get Government Grants and Assistance Program
Get Government Grants and Assistance ProgramGet Government Grants and Assistance Program
Get Government Grants and Assistance Program
Get Government Grants
 
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 372024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
JSchaus & Associates
 
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
850fcj96
 
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) AmendmentPPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
ahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933FPPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
ahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930FPPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
ahcitycouncil
 
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdfPNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
ClaudioTebaldi2
 
Many ways to support street children.pptx
Many ways to support street children.pptxMany ways to support street children.pptx
Many ways to support street children.pptx
SERUDS INDIA
 
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptxPD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
RIDPRO11
 

Recently uploaded (20)

MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptxMHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
 
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdfNHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
NHAI_Under_Implementation_01-05-2024.pdf
 
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
 
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxWhat is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
 
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenUnderstanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
 
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 362024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
 
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
 
Get Government Grants and Assistance Program
Get Government Grants and Assistance ProgramGet Government Grants and Assistance Program
Get Government Grants and Assistance Program
 
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 372024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
 
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
 
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
快速制作(ocad毕业证书)加拿大安大略艺术设计学院毕业证本科学历雅思成绩单原版一模一样
 
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) AmendmentPPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
 
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933FPPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
 
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930FPPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
 
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdfPNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
 
Many ways to support street children.pptx
Many ways to support street children.pptxMany ways to support street children.pptx
Many ways to support street children.pptx
 
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptxPD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
 

The Judicial Branch

  • 2. Key Words • Concurrent Jurisdiction • Original Jurisdiction • Appellate Jurisdiction • Litigant • Due Process Clause • Grand Jury • Indictment • Petit Jury • Judicial Circuit • Senatorial Courtesy • Riding the Circuit • Opinion • Writ of Certiorari • Per Curium • Opinion • Brief • Amicus Curiae • Majority Opinion • Dissenting Opinion
  • 3. Key Words • Judicial Review • Impound • Stare Decisis • Precedent • Advisory Opinion • Bloc • Swing Vote • civil law • contract • expressed contract • implied contract • real property • law • constitutional law • statute • ordinance • statutory law • administrative law • common law • equity • due process • substantive due process • procedural due process • adversary system • presumed innocence
  • 4. • personal property • mortgage • tort • plaintiff • Defendant • injunction • complaint • summons • answer • discovery • mediation • affidavit • criminal law • criminal justice system • petty offense • misdemeanor • felony • arrest warrant • grand jury • indictment • information • plea bargaining • jury, verdict • hung jury • sentence
  • 5. Objectives 1. Explain the Jurisdiction of the different courts 2. Analyze important Supreme Court Cases 3. Compare and Contrast the differences between a District Court and an Appellate Court 4. Evaluate the different ways why someone is choosing as a Federal Judge 5. List the 9 Supreme Court Justices 6. Describe the characteristics of a Supreme Court Justice
  • 6. THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Chapter 11
  • 7. POWERS OF THE FEDERAL COURTS Section One
  • 8. History of Branch • The Supreme Court played a minor role until Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835). • His leadership helped to increase the power of the Court
  • 9. Jurisdiction of the Courts Definition: • The authority or subject area that a court can hear a case about. • Example: Break a federal law, go to a federal court (robbing a bank). • Example: Break a state law, go to a state court (speeding).
  • 10. Powers of the Federal Court System Federal Courts 1. Federal Law 2. Treaties with foreign nations 3. Bankruptcy 4. Admiralty or maritime law 5. Foreign diplomats or foreign governments 6. Two or more state governments 7. The United States government 8. Citizens of different states 9. A state and a citizen of a different state 10. Land grant claims of different states Supreme Court Power: 1. Interpret the Constitution 2. Determine the constitutionality of state laws 3. Uphold regulatory laws 4. Protect civil liberties 5. Influence public policy
  • 11. Types of Jurisdiction • Concurrent– cases can be tried in either federal or state court. • A common type of concurrent jurisdiction: is “Diverse Citizenship” –dispute involving citizens of different states. • Federal District Courts may hear these if over $75,000 is involved. • Defendant can have the trial moved from the Plaintiff’s state to a federal district court. • Example: Land dispute between people from different states.
  • 12. Types of Jurisdiction Original– court with the authority to be the 1st to hear a case Usually found within District courts and are trial courts, where original jurisdiction takes place, trails are held, and juries may be impaneled.
  • 13.
  • 14. US Supreme Court 9 Justices D.C. Original and appellate Fewest cases 80-150/year US Court of Appeals 12 Courts (3 judge panel) Appellate US District Court 94 Courts (judge and 2 types of juries: 1. grand - indicts 2. petit - determines guilty or innocence) Original Most cases
  • 15. Marbury V. Madison • Created the concept of “judicial review” which allows the Supreme Court to declare the actions or Acts of Congress as unconstitutional • 9-0, Chief Justice John Marshall • Without this ruling, a Supreme Court and some say Checks and Balances do not exist…
  • 17.
  • 18. Federal District Courts • Created by Congress in 1789 to serve as trail courts • 94 district courts; with 646 judges • 2 Judges per district • Usually preside alone • Handle over 300,000 cases Examples: • Bank robbery • Mail fraud • Counterfeiting • Tax evasion • Bankruptcy • Civil rights
  • 19. Federal Court of Appeals • Created by Congress in 1891, 3 judge panel • Relieves the Supreme Court of burden of hearing all appeals • Currently 13 courts of appeals: 12 judicial circuits (regions) and 1 for national jurisdiction • 179 circuit judges, 55,000 cases a year • May uphold, overrule, or modify the decision being appealed • No trail, no testimony of witnesses, panel of judges is looking for errors in procedure of law
  • 20. U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS
  • 21. Legislative Courts/Special Courts 1. US Court of Federal Claims (you suing the federal government) 2. Territorial Courts (land owned by U.S. like Guam) 3. Courts of the District of Columbia (court for people in D.C.) 4. US Tax Court (any violation of federal tax laws) 5. US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces (military has own set of laws, so they need their own court – appeals from JAG) 6. US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (if a veteran loses a service, this is where they appeal their case – like Agent Orange cases) 7. Court of International Trade- Civil cases arising out of tariff and other trade-related laws
  • 22. APPOINTING JUDGES Article II, Section II, Clause II – Supreme Court appointment process: Says that “the President shall nominate and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint…Judges of the Supreme Court.”
  • 24. Introduction • Supreme Court is the ultimate court of appeals in the United States. • They are the the final authority in any case involving the Constitution, acts of Congress, and treaties with other nations
  • 25. Introduction Cont. • Their power to hear a case is discretionary, no required to hear all cases • If they chose to not hear a case, they do not have to give any rationale for why they have chosen not to hear the case…but sometimes they do. • Until 1891, justices spent much of their time riding the circuit, or traveling to hold court in their assigned regions of the country.
  • 26. Supreme Court Jurisdiction • Has both original and appellate jurisdiction • Article 3, Section 2 sets courts original jurisdiction and covers two types of cases: 1. Representation of foreign government 2. State is a party.
  • 27. Session • First Monday of October each year and usually continues in session through June. • Receives and disposes of approximately 5-9,000 cases a year. • Cases are heard with all the Justices sitting together in open court. • Each year the Supreme Court hears about 150 cases of national importance and 3/4ths of such decisions are announced in full published opinions.
  • 28. Term and Salary For Constitutional Courts their term is LIFE • Until judge resigns, retires, or dies • Can be removed through impeachment (13 impeached, 7 of them removed) • Salary is same and set by Congress and can not be decreased during their term in office.
  • 29. Justices and their Duties • His/her main duty is hear and rule on cases 1. Deciding which cases to hear 2. Deciding the case itself 3. Determining an explanation for the decision, called the Court’s opinion
  • 30. U.S. Supreme Court Justices
  • 31. • Chief Justice • Born in 1955 • J.D. Harvard Law • U.S. Court of Appeals for DC in 2003 (GWB) • George W. Bush nominated him C.J in 2005 [78-22] • Roman Catholic
  • 32. • Associate Justice • Born in 1950 • J.D. Yale • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit in 1990 (GHWB) • George W. Bush nominated in 2006 [58-42] • Roman Catholic
  • 33. • Associate Justice • Born in 1938 • LL.B. Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (Carter) • Bill Clinton nominated him in 1994 [87-9] • Jewish
  • 34. • Associate Justice • Born in 1948 • J.D. Yale • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (GHWB) • George H.W. Bush nominated him in 1991 [52-48] • Roman Catholic
  • 35. • Associate Justice • Born in 1936 • LL.B Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit in 1975 (Ford) • Ronald Reagan nominated him in 1988 [97-0] • Roman Catholic
  • 36. • Associate Justice • Born in 1933 • LL.B Columbia • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (Carter) • Bill Clinton nominated her in 1993 [96-3] • Jewish
  • 37. • Associate Justice • Born in 1954 • J.D. Yale • U.S Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit in 1998 (Clinton) • Barack Obama nominated her in 2009 [68-31] • Roman Catholic
  • 38. • Associate Justice • Born in 1960 • J.D. Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals (expired) • Solicitor General represents U.S. Government • Obama nominated her in 2010 [63-37] • Jewish
  • 40. Marbury v. Madison 1803 • ” Created the concept of “judicial review which allows the Supreme Court to declare the actions or Acts of Congress as unconstitutional • 9-0, Chief Justice John Marshall • Without this ruling, a Supreme Court and some say Checks and Balances do not exist…
  • 41. Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 • Established the “separate but equal” doctrine making public segregation of Blacks and Whites legal. [8-1] • If facilities for both races were equal, they could be separate. • Impact- • Legalized separation of everything • Schools, public buildings, hotels, etc.
  • 42. Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) In Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) the issue of police interrogation and rights of the accused came to the forefront. The Supreme Court addressed four similar cases at once. In all cases, the defendant was questioned in a room cut off from the rest of the world under intense pressure and other uncomfortable circumstances. In all four cases, the defendants admitted to the crime, and in three of the cases the defendants signed written confessions that were used as evidence in their respective trials. In the case of Miranda, his confession led to a conviction for kidnapping and rape and 20-30 years in prison for each count. Here is the question facing the court
  • 43. Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled in favor of Miranda, saying that Miranda’s constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment were violated in obtaining the confession. The majority decision felt that, since the police pressured him into a confession without Miranda knowing his rights, the confession should not have been admissible as evidence in his trial. Furthermore, the court felt that a defendant “must be warned prior to any questioning that he has [rights]”. These rights include the right to remain silent, right to an attorney, and so on. This new policy is known as reading a suspect their “Miranda Rights”. Miranda had a retrial without the confession included as evidence and was convicted again anyway. You have the right to remain silent… Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law… You have the right to an attorney… If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you prior to any questioning if you so desire.
  • 44. Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) The Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) is arguably one of the top three most important and most famous cases in U.S. History. At issue was the constitutionality of segregation, a topic that the Supreme Court already decided in 1896 (Plessy v. Ferguson). Oliver Brown was one of 13 parents who filed a class action lawsuit against the Board of Education of Topeka Kansas. Their 20 children (collectively) were all African- American and forced to attend the segregated school about a mile away when there was a white only school just blocks from their homes.
  • 45. In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the Earl Warren Court overturned Plessy v. Ferguson from 58 years earlier and found that state-sponsored segregation was unconstitutional. The “separate but equal” policy that was earlier ruled to have upheld the equal rights clause of the Fourteenth Amendment could never truly be offer equal accommodations to blacks, ruled the court. The court decided, but had little to no power in carrying out the eradication of Jim Crow (segregation) Laws. This decision allowed for the Rosa Parks arrest to play out as it did (1955) and was one of many catalysts for the Modern Civil Rights Movement.
  • 46. Who were the justices of the supreme court? Earl Warren (Chief Justice) Hugo Black Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas Robert H. Jackson Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark Sherman Minton Earl Warren
  • 47. Who were the justices of the supreme court? Earl Warren (Chief Justice) MAJORITY Hugo Black MAJORITY Stanley F. Reed MAJORITY Felix Frankfurter MAJORITY William O. Douglas MAJORITY Robert H. Jackson MAJORITY Harold H. Burton MAJORITY Tom C. Clark MAJORITY Sherman Minton MAJORITY Earl Warren
  • 48. Roe v. Wade 1972 • Legalized the right of women to an abortion under certain circumstances. States were allowed to regulate in later trimesters. “Viability” is the determining factor. • Chief Justice Warren Burger [5-4] • Impact- • Pro-Life • Pro-Choice • Mother’s rights v. Child/Fetus’ rights
  • 49. Citizens United v. FEC (2010) • Dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by organizations. • The United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by a nonprofit corporation.
  • 50. Mapp V. Ohio • Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures," may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts,
  • 51. Gideon v. Wainwright • states are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases to represent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their own attorneys.
  • 52. Lloyd Corp, Ltd. V. Tanner • was a United States Supreme Court case concerning free speech rights on private property.
  • 53. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier • held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection.
  • 54. Engle v. Vitale, (1962) In Engle v. Vitale, (1962) the issue of mandatory prayer in public school was addressed. In this case, a New York state law required public schools to start each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer that mentioned a dependence on an “Almighty God”. It was mandatory for schools to do it each day, but not necessarily mandatory for students to participate (students had the option not to participate if they objected. A parent (Engel) sued the state, arguing that the law violated the establishment clause of the first amendment. The question at hand was straightforward. Can a public school open the school day with a prayer?
  • 55. Engle v. Vitale, (1962)Text from the First Amendment… “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
  • 56. In an 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court sided with Engel (the parent), agreeing that the use of prayer to open the school day was a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The clause states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. The majority (the judges who ruled in favor of Engel) said that, even though students could choose non- participation, the purpose of the Establishment Clause was to keep government from interfering with religion. Even though most Americans believed it God at the time, this was promoting certain belief systems over others, and therefore unconstitutional.
  • 57. Who were the justices of the supreme court? Earl Warren (Chief Justice) Hugo Black Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan, Jr. Potter Stewart Byron White Earl Warren
  • 58. Who were the justices of the supreme court? Earl Warren (Chief Justice) MAJORITY Hugo Black MAJORITY Felix Frankfurter MAJORITY William O. Douglas CONCURRENCE Tom C. Clark MAJORITY John M. Harlan II MAJORITY William J. Brennan, Jr. MAJORITY Potter Stewart DISSENT Byron White MAJORITY Earl Warren
  • 59. New Jersey v. T.L.O., (1985) In New Jersey v. T.L.O, (1985) a decision was made regarding the constitutionality of searching students in public high schools. In this case, T.L.O. was found in possession of cigarettes after being caught smoking in the bathroom and brought to the office. In the searching of her purse, she was also found in possession of marijuana and other drug paraphernalia. Here was the big question. Where is the line between a child’s Fourth Amendment right to privacy and a school’s right to maintain order and a drug-free environment? And here was the specific question facing the court.
  • 60. In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled in favor of New Jersey, agreeing that the search was reasonable and did not violate T.L.O.’s Fourth Amendment right protecting against illegal search and seizure. The majority wrote that the principal had reasonable suspicion that a school rule may have been broken by her being caught smoking in the bathroom, therefore it was reasonable for him to search the contents of her purse. While searching the purse, more incriminating evidence was in plain view, therefore no “warrant” (as prescribed in the Fourth Amendment) was necessary. This ruling has guided administrators around the country in performing legal searches and maintaining order on campuses.
  • 62. The Court’s Procedures During two week sessions, justices hear oral arguments The justices consider arguments in cases they have heard and petitions from plaintiffs and then write opinions for cases they have decided. Justices’ written opinions interpret the law and help shape public policy. Opinion-written statement on a cases they have already decided.
  • 63. Selecting Cases • “Rule of Four”- only four of nine justices need to agree to hear a case
  • 64. Chapter 12: Steps in Deciding Major Cases
  • 65. The Court’s Procedures The justices listen to oral arguments by lawyers on each side of the cases before them. Later they announce their opinions on cases they have heard. The Court hears oral arguments from Monday through Wednesday. On Wednesdays and Fridays the justices meet in secret conferences to decide cases. opinions—written statements on cases they have already decided.
  • 66. How Cases Reach the Court The main route to the Supreme Court is by a writ of certiorari an order from the Court to a lower court to send up the records on a case for review. The party seeking review petitions the Court for certiorari and must argue either that the lower court made a legal error in handling the case or that the case raises a significant constitutional issue.
  • 67. The Solicitor General Close to half of the cases decided by the Supreme Court involve the federal government in the suit. The solicitor general is appointed by the president and represents the federal government before the Supreme Court.
  • 68. Step One: Submitting Briefs • Brief- written statement setting forth the legal arguments, relevant facts, and precedents supporting one side of a case
  • 69. Selecting Cases When the justices accept a case, they also decide whether to ask for more information from the opposing lawyers or to rule quickly on the basis of written materials already available. If the Court rules without consulting new information, the ruling may be announced with a per curiam. a brief, unsigned statement of the Court’s decision.
  • 70. Step 2: Oral Arguments • After briefs lawyers from each side present oral arguments before the court Monday- Wednesday • They usually last 30 minutes
  • 71. Step Three: The Conference • Justices meet Wednesday and Fridays • A tradition is they shake hands • The conference meetings are secret • A majority must be in agreement to decide a case, and at least 6 must be present.
  • 72. Step Four: Writing the Opinion • States the facts of the case, announces the Court’s ruling, and explains its reasoning in reaching the decision 1. Unanimous- all justices vote the same way. 2. Majority- expresses the views of the majority of the justices on a case 3. Concurring- Agree with majority’s decision but have a different reason why 4. Dissenting- opinion of justices on the losing side in a case
  • 74. Factors of Influence 1. Existing Laws 2. Personal views of the justices 3. The justices’ interactions with one another 4. Social forces and public attitudes 5. Congress and the President • Law is the foundation for deciding a case.
  • 75. Bloc- coalition of justices, exist on the Court on certain kinds of issues. Swing votes-the deciding vote
  • 77. Plaintiff The person(s) bring a case forward for the courts to review. Defendant The person(s) that the case is being brought against
  • 78. Verdict Acquittal a judgment that a person is not guilty of the crime with which the person has been charged. Conviction a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.
  • 79. Double Jeopardy • forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.
  • 80. Bail • Money paid to get a person out of jail while on trial.
  • 81. Symbolic Speech • law used to describe actions that purposefully and discernibly convey a particular message or statement to those viewing it.
  • 82. Establishment Clause • The U.S. cannot have an official religion Countries with Official Religion 1. Costa Rica 2. Most of the Middle East 3. Thailand 4. Israel
  • 83. Not Protected • Obscenity • Fighting words • Defamation • Child pornography • Perjury • Blackmail • Incitement to imminent lawless action • True threats • Solicitations to commit crimes