Basics Of Grant Writing from Precise EditDavid Bowman
1-day grant writing course from Precise Edit, experts in preparing winning funding proposals. This presentation shows how we help clients get funded--and how we can help you.
Sheet1Summary Milestone ScheduleSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember61320273101724181522295121926Project PlanningProject Start Date: September 6thDevelop Project charter and planDevelop work plan and resource planProject Plan approved: October 3rdOn-board resources for projectSnack food manufacturingIdentify Snack foods for productionSetup Darwin facility for test productionProduce test snack line-up for marketProduction for test market complete Nov 15thTest Marketing Market research for Northern territoryIdentify retail food chains for partnershipIntroduce snack foods in chainsSnack food introduction in all chains complete: 22 NovMonitor and ExpandMonitor customer feedback in test marketMake changes to product and roll-outIdentify plants for mass productionProject Close outSetup Plant for mass productionPhase-out activities for projectProject End Date: December 26th
Health Interview with my volunteer patient
· Female patient 29 years old height 5’6.
· She’s a full time teacher at a local community college.
· Broke her leg by tearing her ACL muscle back in September 2012 after playing tennis with fracture to femur. Had surgery, by performing a Patella Repair that following December and had to use a CPM machine for a month. Physical therapy to follow for 6 months after. In that time gained 100lbs with her highest weight at 287lbs.
· Had abnormal cyst with tumor in it in left kidney. Was 2cm in march 2019 and grew to 8.1cm by august. Had partial Nephrectomy surgery in October 2019
· Had Gastric By Pass Surgery mid December 2019 helping her to lose weight with current weight at 194lbs. Has surgical scars on abdomen. She engages in yoga 4 times a week, plays tennis 3x a week go to gymnastics 2x a week.
· No smoking history or drinking.
· Drinks lots of protein shakes and takes daily vitamins. And drinks A liter of water daily.
·
NUR 325 Module Three Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The short paper reflects the compilation and analysis of data collected during the patient volunteer health history interview. The paper is private between the
student and instructor. Within the paper, you will have the opportunity to discuss interview techniques and strategies that were utilized in the patient interview
to facilitate therapeutic communication with a patient. You will also provide a brief synopsis of the health history information that was collected, describe health
risks and health behaviors that were identified in the volunteer interview, and prioritize a health promotion need. Be sure to address all of the required
elements outlined in the prompt.
Prompt
This week you completed a health history interview with your patient volunteer. Address the following prompts based on your experience:
A. Discuss the interviewing skills that were utilized when collecting the volunteer’s health history information. What strategies were used to develop
therapeutic rapport with the patient?
B. Provide a brief synopsis of the pertinen.
Basics Of Grant Writing from Precise EditDavid Bowman
1-day grant writing course from Precise Edit, experts in preparing winning funding proposals. This presentation shows how we help clients get funded--and how we can help you.
Sheet1Summary Milestone ScheduleSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember61320273101724181522295121926Project PlanningProject Start Date: September 6thDevelop Project charter and planDevelop work plan and resource planProject Plan approved: October 3rdOn-board resources for projectSnack food manufacturingIdentify Snack foods for productionSetup Darwin facility for test productionProduce test snack line-up for marketProduction for test market complete Nov 15thTest Marketing Market research for Northern territoryIdentify retail food chains for partnershipIntroduce snack foods in chainsSnack food introduction in all chains complete: 22 NovMonitor and ExpandMonitor customer feedback in test marketMake changes to product and roll-outIdentify plants for mass productionProject Close outSetup Plant for mass productionPhase-out activities for projectProject End Date: December 26th
Health Interview with my volunteer patient
· Female patient 29 years old height 5’6.
· She’s a full time teacher at a local community college.
· Broke her leg by tearing her ACL muscle back in September 2012 after playing tennis with fracture to femur. Had surgery, by performing a Patella Repair that following December and had to use a CPM machine for a month. Physical therapy to follow for 6 months after. In that time gained 100lbs with her highest weight at 287lbs.
· Had abnormal cyst with tumor in it in left kidney. Was 2cm in march 2019 and grew to 8.1cm by august. Had partial Nephrectomy surgery in October 2019
· Had Gastric By Pass Surgery mid December 2019 helping her to lose weight with current weight at 194lbs. Has surgical scars on abdomen. She engages in yoga 4 times a week, plays tennis 3x a week go to gymnastics 2x a week.
· No smoking history or drinking.
· Drinks lots of protein shakes and takes daily vitamins. And drinks A liter of water daily.
·
NUR 325 Module Three Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The short paper reflects the compilation and analysis of data collected during the patient volunteer health history interview. The paper is private between the
student and instructor. Within the paper, you will have the opportunity to discuss interview techniques and strategies that were utilized in the patient interview
to facilitate therapeutic communication with a patient. You will also provide a brief synopsis of the health history information that was collected, describe health
risks and health behaviors that were identified in the volunteer interview, and prioritize a health promotion need. Be sure to address all of the required
elements outlined in the prompt.
Prompt
This week you completed a health history interview with your patient volunteer. Address the following prompts based on your experience:
A. Discuss the interviewing skills that were utilized when collecting the volunteer’s health history information. What strategies were used to develop
therapeutic rapport with the patient?
B. Provide a brief synopsis of the pertinen.
Ratings, Overhead, and Measuring Impact: How to Use Your Social Sector Excell...Bloomerang
https://bloomerang.co/resources/webinars/
Richard Neustedter of Nonprofit Financial Specialists, and Barbara O’Reilly, CFRE of Windmill Hill Consulting, will lead an in-depth look at how to combine factors like ratings, overhead, impact into strategic donor communications that showcase qualitative and quantitative results and vision to retain current donors and attract new ones.
Competitive Grant Seeking for For-Profit Businesses will provide you with a better understanding of:
• The type of grant funding for-profit businesses are eligible for;
• What types of activities and outcomes within a business are appropriate for grant funding; and
• How to apply for grant funds as an individual business or through partnerships.
Using the Logic Model for Impact & Success; #SLA2017Rebecca Jones
Given at the SLA Conference in Phoenix 2017, an overview of the logic model to measure the outcomes of information services & programs from the decision-makers' perspectives.
As grant professionals, we work to avoid all errors in grant applications—from math, to grammar, to citations. Nevertheless, we are all human and oversights slip through. Often the mistakes are minor and overlooked by a potential funder. However, there are times when an error can jeopardize a funding award. It has happened to many—if not all—of us. The critical question is how, as a new or seasoned grant professional, to learn from these mistakes and still successfully continue to move your organization or your client forward.
5 ways instant incentives are changing market researchJignesh Shah
Learn how incentives delivered instantly on any device are making market research faster, cheaper and global.
For years, researchers have been bogged down by the costs and limitations of using cash, checks and plastic gift cards. Preparing, delivering and tracking such incentives is an administrative burden that sucks up a lot of time and resources away from core research tasks.
Now, the popularity of digital gifts and payments along with incentives management tools is giving researchers new flexibility and the ability to automate incentives.
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
The Leaky Fundraising Bucket – What’s Wrong and How to Fix ItBloomerang
https://bloomerang.co/resources/webinars/
Ellen Bristol and Linda Lysakowski, ACFRE will give you some ideas on how to fix your fundraising and stops the “leaks” in your own “bucket.”
Sensight Surveys - Delight and Retain Your Senior Living Residents and Staff ...Lynn Ackerman, Ph.D.
Do you know how your senior living residents and team members feel?
A good survey program gives you the honest feedback you need to gauge what you are doing well, what improvements are needed, and how to act on your results in a way that will delight and retain your residents and staff, build positive word of mouth, and grow occupancy.
This SMARTwebinar covers:
• The truth about customer and employee satisfaction and retention
• What a well-designed survey program will help you learn
• How to act on your results to create positive change in your community
This workshop provides you with practical guidance for navigating copyright questions and other legal considerations for your dissertation or thesis.
It was presented online to UC Berkeley on October 25, 2021.
Ratings, Overhead, and Measuring Impact: How to Use Your Social Sector Excell...Bloomerang
https://bloomerang.co/resources/webinars/
Richard Neustedter of Nonprofit Financial Specialists, and Barbara O’Reilly, CFRE of Windmill Hill Consulting, will lead an in-depth look at how to combine factors like ratings, overhead, impact into strategic donor communications that showcase qualitative and quantitative results and vision to retain current donors and attract new ones.
Competitive Grant Seeking for For-Profit Businesses will provide you with a better understanding of:
• The type of grant funding for-profit businesses are eligible for;
• What types of activities and outcomes within a business are appropriate for grant funding; and
• How to apply for grant funds as an individual business or through partnerships.
Using the Logic Model for Impact & Success; #SLA2017Rebecca Jones
Given at the SLA Conference in Phoenix 2017, an overview of the logic model to measure the outcomes of information services & programs from the decision-makers' perspectives.
As grant professionals, we work to avoid all errors in grant applications—from math, to grammar, to citations. Nevertheless, we are all human and oversights slip through. Often the mistakes are minor and overlooked by a potential funder. However, there are times when an error can jeopardize a funding award. It has happened to many—if not all—of us. The critical question is how, as a new or seasoned grant professional, to learn from these mistakes and still successfully continue to move your organization or your client forward.
5 ways instant incentives are changing market researchJignesh Shah
Learn how incentives delivered instantly on any device are making market research faster, cheaper and global.
For years, researchers have been bogged down by the costs and limitations of using cash, checks and plastic gift cards. Preparing, delivering and tracking such incentives is an administrative burden that sucks up a lot of time and resources away from core research tasks.
Now, the popularity of digital gifts and payments along with incentives management tools is giving researchers new flexibility and the ability to automate incentives.
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
The Leaky Fundraising Bucket – What’s Wrong and How to Fix ItBloomerang
https://bloomerang.co/resources/webinars/
Ellen Bristol and Linda Lysakowski, ACFRE will give you some ideas on how to fix your fundraising and stops the “leaks” in your own “bucket.”
Sensight Surveys - Delight and Retain Your Senior Living Residents and Staff ...Lynn Ackerman, Ph.D.
Do you know how your senior living residents and team members feel?
A good survey program gives you the honest feedback you need to gauge what you are doing well, what improvements are needed, and how to act on your results in a way that will delight and retain your residents and staff, build positive word of mouth, and grow occupancy.
This SMARTwebinar covers:
• The truth about customer and employee satisfaction and retention
• What a well-designed survey program will help you learn
• How to act on your results to create positive change in your community
Similar to Update on UC Berkeley Library Open Access Investment Process (20)
This workshop provides you with practical guidance for navigating copyright questions and other legal considerations for your dissertation or thesis.
It was presented online to UC Berkeley on October 25, 2021.
Slides from the ACRL 2021 conference panel presentation "Open access investment at the local level: Sharing diverse tactics to improve access and affordability."
Panelists include:
- Sam Teplitzky, Open Science Librarian, UC Berkeley
- Timothy Vollmer, Scholarly Communication & Copyright Librarian, UC Berkeley
- Sharla Lair, Senior Strategist, Open Access & Scholarly Communication Initiatives at LYRASIS
- Tom Narock, Assistant Professor of Data Science at Goucher College
- Justin Gonder, Senior Product Manager, Publishing, California Digital Library.
Panel topic:
Improving accessibility, inclusivity, and affordability of scholarship is a central tenet to realizing a more equitable higher education system. Many decisions about open access investments take place at administrative or consortial levels, but librarians frequently field requests for access, resources, or partnerships at the local level through their relationships with students, researchers, and faculty. An open access investment working group was established at UC Berkeley Library in late 2019 to bridge this gap between larger scale strategic investment and local decision making. The group proposed a set of criteria to guide library investments in sustainable open access projects. With this group’s work in the foreground, the panel will share real-world examples of where and how academic libraries decide to invest in open access resources. Panelists will discuss commonalities and differences in strategies and give attendees examples they can apply in their own roles.
These are slides from the copyright session of the Building Legal Literacies for Text Data Mining (Building LLTDM) Institute. Hosted by the University of California, Berkeley Library's Office of Scholarly Communication Services.
This is a presentation delivered on December 1, 2020 by the UC Berkeley Library's Office of Scholarly Communication Services and the Research Data Management Program.
Are you unsure about how you can use or reuse other people’s data in your teaching or research, and what the terms and conditions are? Do you want to share your data with other researchers or license it for reuse but are wondering how and if that’s allowed? Do you have questions about university or granting agency data ownership and sharing policies, rights, and obligations? We will provide clear guidance on all of these questions and more in this interactive webinar on the ins-and-outs of data sharing and publishing.
- Explore venues and platforms for sharing and publishing data
- Unpack the terms of contracts and licenses affecting data reuse, sharing, and publishing
- Help you understand how copyright does (and does not) affect what you can do with the data you create or wish to use from other people
- Consider how to license your data for maximum downstream impact and reuse
- Demystify data ownership and publishing rights and obligations under university and grant policies
This training will help you navigate the copyright, fair use, and usage rights of including third-party content in your digital project. Whether you seek to embed video from other sources for analysis, post material you scanned from a visit to the archives, add images, upload documents, or more, understanding the basics of copyright and discovering a workflow for answering copyright-related digital scholarship questions will make you more confident in your publication. We will also provide an overview of your intellectual property rights as a creator and ways to license your own work.
The workshop was delivered over Zoom on November 10, 2020.
This is a presentation given by Michael Lange and Stacy Reardon of the UC Berkeley Library for the 2020 Digital Library Federation (DLF) Forum.
UC Berkeley Library’s responsible access workflows and a corresponding community engagement policy support cultural heritage institutions seeking to digitize special collections by helping institutions navigate complex areas of law and policy. They also address social justice, adopting an ethics of care approach that balances potential value and harm.
This is a workshop aimed at graduate students and early career researchers to provide practical strategies and tips for promoting scholarship, increasing citations, and monitoring success. It explores how to understand metrics, use scholarly networking tools, evaluate journals and publishing options, and take advantage of funding opportunities for Open Access scholarship.
It was delivered over Zoom on 20 October 2020.
This is a workshop to provide grad students with practical guidance for navigating copyright questions and other legal considerations for their dissertation or thesis.
It was delivered over Zoom on 19 October 2020.
This is a workshop put together by the UC Berkeley Library on how to get started with Pressbooks as digital book creation and publishing platform. It was delivered on September 15, 2020.
As part of the Digital Lifecycle Program, the UC Berkeley Library aims to digitize 200 million items from its special collections (rare books, manuscripts, photographs, archives, and ephemera) for the world to discover and use. But before we can digitize and publish them online for worldwide access, we have to sort out legal and ethical questions. We’ve created and released "responsible access workflows" that will benefit not only our Library’s digitization efforts, but also those of cultural heritage institutions such as museums, archives, and libraries throughout the nation.
This is a presentation by members of the Digital Lifecycle Program working group to the UC Berkeley Library on August 10, 2020.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Update on UC Berkeley Library Open Access Investment Process
1. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
Update:
Open Access resource
investment at
UCB Library
June 1, 2021
Photo by James Sullivan on Unsplash
2. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
Implementation goals
1. Accurately reflects Library priorities
2. Easy process for Selectors
3. Clear how CDLG is involved
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash
3. OA Investment Criteria
Impact
● specific positive disciplinary
impact
● provide indicators of faculty
impact and/or student
success
● provides or improves
access to unique content
or services not otherwise
available
Sustainability & governance
● contribute to sustainability of an
important project/initiative
● mission-driven to serve scholarly
researchers and/or the public interest
● commitment to advancing social justice
and diversity
● Not-for-profit
● demonstrates operational and financial
stability, or has a plan to do so
● provides disclosure and transparency in
finances and governance
● open access to content/data/software
under open licenses
● meets or exceeds relevant technical
standards
UCB focused
● supports UCB mission and
Library strategic priorities and
values
● endorsed or led by academic
community members,
especially UCB scholars
● supports/promotes reputation &
visibility of UCB scholarship
● reduce access barriers to the
UCB community
● reduce financial barriers, with
savings passed on to UCB
community
● meets or exceeds existing UCB
infrastructure requirements
4. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
● Vendor: Fills out
criteria-responsive
questionnaire.
● Selector: Maps vendor
responses to how well they
satisfy criteria, using
spreadsheet with indicators.
Writes recommendation.
Basic process & tools
5.
6.
7. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
Two review paths
● Low threshold: <$5000
● High threshold: >$5000
Photo by Sahand Hoseini on Unsplash
8. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from
vendor, project, etc.
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet, produce
1 paragraph blurb
recommendation whether to
fund or not
Passes
review?
Yes
No
Low threshold: <$5000
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
1
2
4
3
5
9. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from
vendor, project, etc.
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet, produce
1 paragraph blurb
recommendation whether to
fund or not
Passes
review?
Yes
No
Low threshold: <$5000
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
1
2
4
3
5
10. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from
vendor, project, etc.
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet, produce
1 paragraph blurb
recommendation whether to
fund or not
Passes
review?
Yes
No
Low threshold: <$5000
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
1
2
4
3
5
11. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from
vendor, project, etc.
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet, produce
1 paragraph blurb
recommendation whether to
fund or not
Passes
review?
Yes
No
Low threshold: <$5000
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
1
2
4
3
5
12. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from
vendor, project, etc.
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet, produce
1 paragraph blurb
recommendation whether to
fund or not
Passes
review?
Yes
No
Low threshold: <$5000
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
1
2
4
3
5
13. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
14. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
15.
16. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
17. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
18. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
19. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
20.
21. Selector Librarian
gets request for
funding from vendor,
project, etc.
Selector fills out OA
funding intake form
Selector uses questionnaire
answers to complete OA
criteria spreadsheet,
produce memo summary
recommendation to fund or
not
CDLG
gives ok
to review
Yes
No
Selector sends
questionnaire to vendor;
vendor completes survey
with answers relevant to
their resource/product
Selector is in contact
with vendor if more
information needed
High threshold: >$5000
Passes
review?
CDLG
decision?
Yes
No
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
22. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
● Luminos
● University of Michigan Press
eBook Collection
● More to come
Kicking the tires
Photo by Robert Laursoo on Unsplash
23. Photo by Susan Gold on Unsplash
Things yet to organize
1. Setting up documentation
2. Selector training
Photo by Edgar Chaparro on Unsplash