Unit 5
GROUP TECHNOLOGY
GROUP TECHNOLOGY
GROUP TECHNOLOGY IS A MANUFACTURING
TECHNIQUE AND PHILOSOPHY TO INCREASE
PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY BY EXPLOITING THE
“UNDERLYING SAMENESS” OF COMPONENT
SHAPE, DIMENSIONS, PROCESS ROUTE, ETC.
• Group Technology is the realization that
many problems are similar, and that by
grouping similar problems, a single
solution can be found to a set of problems
thus saving time and effort. (Solaja 73)
• First book formalize the concept:
Mitrofanov,S.P. 1958, "The Scientific Principles
of Group Technology"
WHY GROUP TECHNOLOGY?
• AVERAGE LOT SIZE DECREASING
• PART VARIETY INCREASING
• INCREASED VARIETY OF MATERIALS
WITH DIVERSE PROPERTIES
• REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSER
TOLERANCES
FLEXIBILITY
PRODUCTION CAPACITY
TRANSFER
LINE
SPECIAL
SYSTEM
FLEXIBLE
MANUFACTURING
SYSTEM
MANUFACTURING
Cells
STD. AND GEN.
MACHINERY
VOLUME
HIGH
VARIETY
LOW HIGH
EVERYDAY EXAMPLES
1. FAST FOOD CHAINS
2. DOCTORS, DENTISTS
AND ALSO MANUFACTURING
A FAMILY OF PARTS
PRODUCTION
FAMILY
• LACK OF COMMON DATABASE FOR
MFG., DESIGN...
• DON’T “REDESIGN THE WHEEL”
• AUTOMATED PROCESS PLANNING
• DATABASE TO DRIVE THE
AUTOMATED FACTORY
BENEFITS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY
REDUCTIONS IN
THROUGHPUT TIME
SET-UP TIME
OVERDUE ORDERS
PRODUCTION FLOOR SPACE
RAW MATERIAL STOCKS
IN-PROCESS INVENTORY
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOOLING COSTS
ENGINEERING TIME AND COSTS
NEW PARTS DESIGN
NEW SHOP DRAWINGS
TOTAL NUMBER OF DRAWINGS
Cont’d
OTHER BENEFITS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY
EASIER TO JUSTIFY AUTOMATION
STANDARDIZATION IN DESIGN
DATA RETRIEVAL
EASIER, MORE STANDARDIZED PROCESS PLANS
INCREASES IN QUALITY
GT AFFECTS MOST EVERY OPERATING AND STAFF FUNCTION.
IT IS MORE THAN MERELY A TECHNIQUE, BUT A TOTAL
MANUFACTURING PHILOSOPHY.
GT
DESIGN
ENGINEERING
DATA
PROCESSING
MAINTENANCE
TOOL
ENGINEERING
ESTIMATING
INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS
QUALITY
CONTROL
R & D
COST
ACCOUNTING
SALES
INVENTORY
PLANNING
PURCHASING
ASSEMBLY
MANAGEMENT
MFG.
ENGINEERING
SHIPPING &
RECEIVING
THREE TECHNIQUES TO FORM PART FAMILIES
1. TACIT JUDGMENT OR VISUAL
INSPECTION
2. PRODUCTION FLOW ANALYSIS
• MAY USE PHOTOS OR PART
PRINTS
• UTILIZES SUBJECTIVE
JUDGMENT
• USES INFORMATION CONTAINED
ON THE ROUTE SHEET
(THEREFORE ONLY MFG. INFO)
• PARTS GROUPED BY REQUIRED
PROCESSING
Cont’d
3. CLASSIFICATION AND CODING
• CODES GEOMETRY/DESIGN AND MFG.
INFO ABOUT A COMPONENT
• CODES ARE ALPHANUMERIC STRINGS
• EASIER TO USE FOR OTHER ANALYSES
TYPES OF CLASSIFICATION AND CODING SYSTEMS
GT CODING CAN BENEFIT MANY FACETS OF THE
FIRM AND FALL INTO ONE OF 3 CATEGORIES:
1. SYSTEMS BASED ON PART DESIGN
ATTRIBUTES
2. SYSTEMS BASED ON PART MFG.
ATTRIBUTES
3. SYSTEMS BASED ON DESIGN AND MFG.
ATTRIBUTES
EXAMPLES:
PART DESIGN ATTRIBUTES
BASIC EXTERNAL SHAPE
BASIC INTERNAL SHAPE
MATERIAL
PART MFG. ATTRIBUTES
MAJOR PROCESSES
MINOR OPERATIONS
FIXTURES NEEDED
LENGTH/DIAMETER RATIO
SURFACE FINISH
TOLERANCES-----MACHINE TOOL
OPERATION SEQUENCE
MAJOR DIMENSION
TOOLING
BATCH SIZE
GT CODE--A SEQUENCE OF NUMERICAL DIGITS
THREE MAJOR STRUCTURES:
1. MONOCODE (OR HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE)
A CODE IN WHICH EACH DIGIT AMPLIFIES THE
INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE PREVIOUS DIGIT
• DIFFICULT TO CONSTRUCT
• PROVIDES A DEEP ANALYSIS
• USUALLY FOR PERMANENT INFORMATION
cont’d
2. POLYCODE (OR CHAIN-TYPE STRUCTURE)
EACH DIGIT IS INDEPENDENT OF ALL OTHERS,
PRESENTS INFORMATION NOT DEPENDENT
ON PREVIOUS ONES
• EASIER TO ACCOMMODATE
CHANGE
3. MIXED CODE
HAS SOME DIGITS FORMING MONOCODES, BUT
STRINGS THEM TOGETHER IN THE GENERAL
ARRANGEMENT OF A POLYCODE
POPULATION
SPACE
CODE
SPACE
P
C
MAPPING FROM POPULATION
SPACE TO CODE SPACE
H
UNF
thread
Transmission
HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE
Hydraulic Electrical
Mechanical
32XX
321X
322X
N
o
t
h
r
e
a
d
U
N
C
t
h
r
e
a
d
3222
323X
P
o
w
e
r
R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
3232
3231 3233
3221 3223
Monocode
Polycode Polycode
HYBRID STRUCTURE
REDUCTION OF MFG. COSTS BY VARIOUS
STEPS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS
(ADAPTED FROM HAM442
)
Improvements in Engineering Design
Materials Management & Purchasing Benefits
Production Control Benefits
Manufacturing Engineering Benefits
Tooling & Setup Benefits
Management Benefits
Overall Cost Reduction &
Increased Productivity
NOT ALL COST SAVINGS ARE IMMEDIATE...
0 6 12 18 24 36
Time (months)
SELECTION OF OPTICAL INSTRUMENT PARTS IN ONE COMPANY,
ILLUSTRATING THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN CERTAIN COMPONENTS
• PROLIFERATION OF PARTS
• NOTE: SOME OF THE ABOVE ARE ALMOST THE SAME
GT FOR DESIGN APPLICATION
Conceptual design
Coding (rough model)
Retrieval existing designs
Existing designs
Design modification
New Design
Design
archive
Retrieve designs of similar
shape or function and use
them as the examples.
Design concept can be coded.
Code is a rough model of the
conceptual design.
TECHNIQUE:
1. DETERMINE PART AND MACHINE REQUIREMENTS
2. NUMERICALLY CODE EACH PART
GEOMETRY (& SIZE)
MATERIAL
OTHER SPECIFICATIONS (TOLERANCE,
SURFACE FINISH)
3. FORM A FAMILY OF SIMILAR PARTS WHICH USE
(LARGELY) THE SAME SET OF MACHINE TOOLS
4. LAY OUT OF EACH CELL (A GROUP OF MACHINE
TOOLS) TO MAKE A FAMILY OF PARTS
5. DESIGN GROUP TOOLING
EXAMPLE:
THIRTEEN PARTS WITH SIMILAR MANUFACTURING
PROCESS REQUIREMENTS BUT DIFFERENT
DESIGN ATTRIBUTES
FUNCTIONAL LAYOUTS ARE INEFFICIENT
PROCESS-TYPE LAYOUT
Lathe Milling Drilling
Grinding
Assembly
Receiving and
Shipping
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L M
M
M
M M
M
A A
A A
D
D D
D
G
G
G
G G
G
GROUP TECHNOLOGY LAYOUT
Shipping
L L M D
L M D
G
L M G
G
A A
Receiving
Department #2
Department #3
Department #1
D D M I
D M
L L I
D
M
L
M
I
CELLULAR LAYOUT
1st Digit
part class
Positions
with a
digit
2nd Digit
main shape
3rd Digit
rotational
machining
4th Digit
plane surface
matching
5th Digit
additional
holes teeth &
forming
FORM CODE
Opitz coding and classification system.
(Reprinted with permission from H. Opitz, A
Classification System to Describe Workpieces, Pergamon Press.)
Special
Non-rotational
Special
Rotational
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Internal
shape
element
Rotational
machining
Main bore
& rotational
machining
Other holes
and teeth
Other holes
teeth and
forming
Other holes
teeth and
forming
Machining
of plane
surfaces
Machining
of plane
surfaces
Machining
of plane
surfaces
External
shape
element
Main shape
Main shape
Main shape
Main shape
Supplim-
entary
code
Digit
6 7 8 9
Dimensions
Material
Original
shape
of
raw
materials
Accuracy
Process planning
system
APT Processor
& post-processor
APT Program
Process
XXX
TYPICAL
PROCESS
PLANNING
SYSTEM
Part
programme
r
Production
planner
• Scheduling
• MPP
Industrial engineer
• Time standard
• Operation
instruction
• Layout
Engineering
drawing
Process
planner
Code or
other form
of input
PROCESS PLANNING
“PROCESS PLANNING” IS THAT FUNCTION WITHIN A MANUFACTURING
FACILITY THAT ESTABLISHES WHICH MACHINING PROCESSES AND
PARAMETERS ARE TO BE USED (AS WELL AS THOSE MACHINES CAPABLE
OF PERFORMING THESE PROCESSES) TO CONVERT (MACHINE) A PIECE
PART FROM ITS INITIAL FORM TO A FINAL FORM PREDETERMINED
(USUALLY BY A DESIGN ENGINEER) FROM AN ENGINEERING DRAWING.
(I.E. THE PREPARATION OF THE DETAILED WORK INSTRUCTIONS TO
PRODUCE A PART)
Bridge
Design Manufacturing
Process planning bridges design and
manufacturing
VARIANT PROCESS PLANNING
USES THE SIMILARITY AMONG COMPONENTS
TO RETRIEVE EXISTING PROCESS PLANS
(WHICH CAN BE MODIFIED)
OVERVIEW:
TWO STAGES FOR VP SYSTEMS
1. PREPARATORY STAGE
• EXISTING PARTS CODED &
CLASSIFIED (I.E. GT IS A
PREREQUISITE)
• PART FAMILIES ORGANIZED
• STANDARD PLANS DEVELOPED
• DATABASES CREATED
(NOTE: THIS STAGE IS LABOR INTENSIVE)
Cont’d
Part Drawing
Coding
Family Formation
Process Plan
Family One
Standard
Plan
File
(Indexed
by Family
Matrix)
1. PREPARATORY STAGE OF
VARIANT
PROCESS PLANNING
2. PRODUCTON STAGE OF VARIANT
PROCESS PLANNING
Coding Family Search
Standard
Plan
File
Editing Standard Plan
Retrieval
Process Plan

Unit 5 Group Technology in Computer Aided Design

  • 1.
  • 2.
    GROUP TECHNOLOGY GROUP TECHNOLOGYIS A MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUE AND PHILOSOPHY TO INCREASE PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY BY EXPLOITING THE “UNDERLYING SAMENESS” OF COMPONENT SHAPE, DIMENSIONS, PROCESS ROUTE, ETC.
  • 3.
    • Group Technologyis the realization that many problems are similar, and that by grouping similar problems, a single solution can be found to a set of problems thus saving time and effort. (Solaja 73) • First book formalize the concept: Mitrofanov,S.P. 1958, "The Scientific Principles of Group Technology"
  • 4.
    WHY GROUP TECHNOLOGY? •AVERAGE LOT SIZE DECREASING • PART VARIETY INCREASING • INCREASED VARIETY OF MATERIALS WITH DIVERSE PROPERTIES • REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSER TOLERANCES
  • 5.
  • 6.
    EVERYDAY EXAMPLES 1. FASTFOOD CHAINS 2. DOCTORS, DENTISTS AND ALSO MANUFACTURING A FAMILY OF PARTS
  • 7.
  • 8.
    • LACK OFCOMMON DATABASE FOR MFG., DESIGN... • DON’T “REDESIGN THE WHEEL” • AUTOMATED PROCESS PLANNING • DATABASE TO DRIVE THE AUTOMATED FACTORY
  • 9.
    BENEFITS OF GROUPTECHNOLOGY REDUCTIONS IN THROUGHPUT TIME SET-UP TIME OVERDUE ORDERS PRODUCTION FLOOR SPACE RAW MATERIAL STOCKS IN-PROCESS INVENTORY CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOOLING COSTS ENGINEERING TIME AND COSTS NEW PARTS DESIGN NEW SHOP DRAWINGS TOTAL NUMBER OF DRAWINGS Cont’d
  • 10.
    OTHER BENEFITS OFGROUP TECHNOLOGY EASIER TO JUSTIFY AUTOMATION STANDARDIZATION IN DESIGN DATA RETRIEVAL EASIER, MORE STANDARDIZED PROCESS PLANS INCREASES IN QUALITY
  • 11.
    GT AFFECTS MOSTEVERY OPERATING AND STAFF FUNCTION. IT IS MORE THAN MERELY A TECHNIQUE, BUT A TOTAL MANUFACTURING PHILOSOPHY. GT DESIGN ENGINEERING DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE TOOL ENGINEERING ESTIMATING INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS QUALITY CONTROL R & D COST ACCOUNTING SALES INVENTORY PLANNING PURCHASING ASSEMBLY MANAGEMENT MFG. ENGINEERING SHIPPING & RECEIVING
  • 12.
    THREE TECHNIQUES TOFORM PART FAMILIES 1. TACIT JUDGMENT OR VISUAL INSPECTION 2. PRODUCTION FLOW ANALYSIS • MAY USE PHOTOS OR PART PRINTS • UTILIZES SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT • USES INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE ROUTE SHEET (THEREFORE ONLY MFG. INFO) • PARTS GROUPED BY REQUIRED PROCESSING Cont’d
  • 13.
    3. CLASSIFICATION ANDCODING • CODES GEOMETRY/DESIGN AND MFG. INFO ABOUT A COMPONENT • CODES ARE ALPHANUMERIC STRINGS • EASIER TO USE FOR OTHER ANALYSES
  • 14.
    TYPES OF CLASSIFICATIONAND CODING SYSTEMS GT CODING CAN BENEFIT MANY FACETS OF THE FIRM AND FALL INTO ONE OF 3 CATEGORIES: 1. SYSTEMS BASED ON PART DESIGN ATTRIBUTES 2. SYSTEMS BASED ON PART MFG. ATTRIBUTES 3. SYSTEMS BASED ON DESIGN AND MFG. ATTRIBUTES
  • 15.
    EXAMPLES: PART DESIGN ATTRIBUTES BASICEXTERNAL SHAPE BASIC INTERNAL SHAPE MATERIAL PART MFG. ATTRIBUTES MAJOR PROCESSES MINOR OPERATIONS FIXTURES NEEDED LENGTH/DIAMETER RATIO SURFACE FINISH TOLERANCES-----MACHINE TOOL OPERATION SEQUENCE MAJOR DIMENSION TOOLING BATCH SIZE
  • 16.
    GT CODE--A SEQUENCEOF NUMERICAL DIGITS THREE MAJOR STRUCTURES: 1. MONOCODE (OR HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE) A CODE IN WHICH EACH DIGIT AMPLIFIES THE INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE PREVIOUS DIGIT • DIFFICULT TO CONSTRUCT • PROVIDES A DEEP ANALYSIS • USUALLY FOR PERMANENT INFORMATION cont’d
  • 17.
    2. POLYCODE (ORCHAIN-TYPE STRUCTURE) EACH DIGIT IS INDEPENDENT OF ALL OTHERS, PRESENTS INFORMATION NOT DEPENDENT ON PREVIOUS ONES • EASIER TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGE 3. MIXED CODE HAS SOME DIGITS FORMING MONOCODES, BUT STRINGS THEM TOGETHER IN THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF A POLYCODE
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    REDUCTION OF MFG.COSTS BY VARIOUS STEPS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (ADAPTED FROM HAM442 ) Improvements in Engineering Design Materials Management & Purchasing Benefits Production Control Benefits Manufacturing Engineering Benefits Tooling & Setup Benefits Management Benefits Overall Cost Reduction & Increased Productivity NOT ALL COST SAVINGS ARE IMMEDIATE... 0 6 12 18 24 36 Time (months)
  • 22.
    SELECTION OF OPTICALINSTRUMENT PARTS IN ONE COMPANY, ILLUSTRATING THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN CERTAIN COMPONENTS • PROLIFERATION OF PARTS • NOTE: SOME OF THE ABOVE ARE ALMOST THE SAME
  • 23.
    GT FOR DESIGNAPPLICATION Conceptual design Coding (rough model) Retrieval existing designs Existing designs Design modification New Design Design archive Retrieve designs of similar shape or function and use them as the examples. Design concept can be coded. Code is a rough model of the conceptual design.
  • 24.
    TECHNIQUE: 1. DETERMINE PARTAND MACHINE REQUIREMENTS 2. NUMERICALLY CODE EACH PART GEOMETRY (& SIZE) MATERIAL OTHER SPECIFICATIONS (TOLERANCE, SURFACE FINISH) 3. FORM A FAMILY OF SIMILAR PARTS WHICH USE (LARGELY) THE SAME SET OF MACHINE TOOLS 4. LAY OUT OF EACH CELL (A GROUP OF MACHINE TOOLS) TO MAKE A FAMILY OF PARTS 5. DESIGN GROUP TOOLING
  • 25.
    EXAMPLE: THIRTEEN PARTS WITHSIMILAR MANUFACTURING PROCESS REQUIREMENTS BUT DIFFERENT DESIGN ATTRIBUTES
  • 26.
    FUNCTIONAL LAYOUTS AREINEFFICIENT PROCESS-TYPE LAYOUT Lathe Milling Drilling Grinding Assembly Receiving and Shipping L L L L L L L L M M M M M M A A A A D D D D G G G G G G
  • 27.
    GROUP TECHNOLOGY LAYOUT Shipping LL M D L M D G L M G G A A Receiving
  • 28.
    Department #2 Department #3 Department#1 D D M I D M L L I D M L M I CELLULAR LAYOUT
  • 29.
    1st Digit part class Positions witha digit 2nd Digit main shape 3rd Digit rotational machining 4th Digit plane surface matching 5th Digit additional holes teeth & forming FORM CODE Opitz coding and classification system. (Reprinted with permission from H. Opitz, A Classification System to Describe Workpieces, Pergamon Press.) Special Non-rotational Special Rotational 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Internal shape element Rotational machining Main bore & rotational machining Other holes and teeth Other holes teeth and forming Other holes teeth and forming Machining of plane surfaces Machining of plane surfaces Machining of plane surfaces External shape element Main shape Main shape Main shape Main shape Supplim- entary code Digit 6 7 8 9 Dimensions Material Original shape of raw materials Accuracy
  • 30.
    Process planning system APT Processor &post-processor APT Program Process XXX TYPICAL PROCESS PLANNING SYSTEM Part programme r Production planner • Scheduling • MPP Industrial engineer • Time standard • Operation instruction • Layout Engineering drawing Process planner Code or other form of input
  • 31.
    PROCESS PLANNING “PROCESS PLANNING”IS THAT FUNCTION WITHIN A MANUFACTURING FACILITY THAT ESTABLISHES WHICH MACHINING PROCESSES AND PARAMETERS ARE TO BE USED (AS WELL AS THOSE MACHINES CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THESE PROCESSES) TO CONVERT (MACHINE) A PIECE PART FROM ITS INITIAL FORM TO A FINAL FORM PREDETERMINED (USUALLY BY A DESIGN ENGINEER) FROM AN ENGINEERING DRAWING. (I.E. THE PREPARATION OF THE DETAILED WORK INSTRUCTIONS TO PRODUCE A PART) Bridge Design Manufacturing Process planning bridges design and manufacturing
  • 32.
    VARIANT PROCESS PLANNING USESTHE SIMILARITY AMONG COMPONENTS TO RETRIEVE EXISTING PROCESS PLANS (WHICH CAN BE MODIFIED) OVERVIEW: TWO STAGES FOR VP SYSTEMS 1. PREPARATORY STAGE • EXISTING PARTS CODED & CLASSIFIED (I.E. GT IS A PREREQUISITE) • PART FAMILIES ORGANIZED • STANDARD PLANS DEVELOPED • DATABASES CREATED (NOTE: THIS STAGE IS LABOR INTENSIVE) Cont’d
  • 33.
    Part Drawing Coding Family Formation ProcessPlan Family One Standard Plan File (Indexed by Family Matrix) 1. PREPARATORY STAGE OF VARIANT PROCESS PLANNING
  • 34.
    2. PRODUCTON STAGEOF VARIANT PROCESS PLANNING Coding Family Search Standard Plan File Editing Standard Plan Retrieval Process Plan