Is your institution struggling to develop an easy-to-communicate economic development strategy? Do you have metrics that demonstrate the success of your initiatives? This session will provide an overview of the Balanced Scorecard approach to strategic planning for university economic development, which emphasizes performance metrics and allows universities to communicate their entire strategic plan on a single, poster-sized strategy map. We will examine metrics being used by research universities, universities with entrepreneurial programs, and community colleges across a range of economic development objectives. We will close with a practical, interactive exercise that will allow participants to begin developing their own Balanced Scorecard.
Felix DiCamillo, Director of Business Development, The Rochester Group
Maureen Klovers, President and CEO, Lyon Park Associates
2. Agenda
Overview of Balanced Scorecards and Strategy
Maps
Adapting the Model to University-Led Economic
Development
Discussion on Designing and Implementing Metrics
Interactive Exercise: Translating goals into strategic
objectives, operational objectives, and performance
metrics
Wrap-Up and Feedback
3. Q: How do I decide what to measure?
A: Your metrics should be driven by
your strategy!
…And your strategy should be driven
by your stakeholders’ needs, your
competitive positioning, and your long-
term vision
4. What is a Balanced Scorecard and how is it
different from traditional strategic planning?
Based on work of Kaplan & Norton at HBS—conceived
as a structured approach to integrating financial and non-
financial performance measures
An integrated strategic planning and performance system
that translates an organization’s vision, mission, and
strategy into strategic goals and performance metrics
In lieu of a 300-page document, the end result is a
poster-sized strategy map that illustrates cause-and-
effect relationships among a range of “perspectives,” with
an accompanying list of initiatives (projects) and
performance metrics
Performance metrics are at the heart of a BSC
Doesn’t sit on a shelf—plan is constantly revisited to
measure actual vs. expected performance, ensure
accountability, and set funding priorities
7. What is the process to develop a BSC for
University-Led Economic Development?
1) Conduct an institutional competitiveness assessment
2) Define strategic goals: What does our institution need to do
to be successful in its ED mission?
Enhance regional competitiveness
Equip our students to succeed in a fast-paced, global
economy
Achieve excellence in scholarship, from basic to applied
research, in strategic niches of expertise
Facilitate and incentivize multi-disciplinary collaborations
to solve our region’s most pressing challenges
Improve quality of life in our region
3) Define strategic objectives—How will we achieve this goal?
4) Define operational objectives—How will we manage our
financial, technological, physical, and human resources to
accomplish the strategic objectives?
8. What is the process to develop a BSC for
University-Led Economic Development?
5) Create a strategy map
Plot strategic goals, strategic objectives, and
operational objectives
Starting from the bottom, add arrows to indicate
cause-and-effect relationships
6) Develop one or more performance metrics for each
strategic and operational objective
Clear, causal relationship with objectives
Able to be measured and assignable
Balance any performance trade-offs
Mix of input, output, and outcome metrics
9. What is the process to develop a BSC for
University-Led Economic Development?
7) Set performance targets and assign responsibility
for meeting performance targets
8) Develop initiatives
Initiatives = specific projects, programs, process
improvement activities, analyses, or studies
Defined budget, schedule, and scope
9) Execute the strategy, monitor performance, and
engage in a continuous improvement process
11. “Perhaps what you measure is what
you get. More likely, what you measure
is all you’ll get. What you don’t (or
can’t) measure is lost”
H. Thomas Johnson
Portland State University
12. Jobs created
Jobs retained
Revenue growth
Classic Economic Development Metrics
16. Entrepreneurship
Student, faculty, community engagement
New companies established
New products/services launched
Patents filed
IP licensed
Investment committed
Jobs created
Jobs retained
Revenue growth
Cost savings
Expanding the Measures
17. Entrepreneurship
Program participation numbers
By program type
Costs by program
Demographics of participants
Undergrad, graduate, postdoc, faculty, community
Major, gender, race/ethnicity, nationality, age
Success by demographic category
Industry breakdown of companies
Relationship to university expertise
Relationship to regional industry focus
Success by industry sector
Analyzing the Data
18. Entrepreneurship
Success of new products/services launched
Investment committed
By company, by industry, by demographic
Family & friends, angel, VC, grant, partner/customer
Maturity of company
Concept, pre-seed, seed, early stage, later stage
Years in program
Jobs created/retained
By company, by industry, by demographic
Revenue growth
By company, by industry, by demographic
Analyzing the Data
19. Research
Student, faculty, industry engagement
Faculty/PIs attracted – number & quality
Grants awarded, investment committed
Faculty awards, publications, patents filed
Facilities used
Research output driving corporate/entrepreneurial activity:
IP licensed
Products/services launched
Jobs created
Jobs retained
Revenue growth
Cost savings
Expanding the Measures
20. Research
Faculty, student participation numbers
Demographics of participants
Breakdown by discipline/department
Sources of grants
Sources of investment
Industry partner analysis
Patents filed and IP licensed by discipline
Facilities/resources used
Analyzing the Data
21. Workforce Development
Change of direction requires new measures
Beyond social services
Industry driven training
Middle skills training for advanced manufacturing
Workforce enrichment pays off individually & communally
Strong workforce drives economic growth
Industry Demand
Company, Worker, Program Success
Expanding the Measures
22. Workforce Development
Gap Analysis
Workers trained vs 10 year projected need
Drives programming
Program participation
Impact on the field
Estimated lifetime earnings
Program completions x marginal annual impact
Total annual economic impact
Initial + Direct + Indirect + Induced Impact
Analyzing the Data
23. When the President or Provost asks what you do all
day…
Touches in the entrepreneurial ecosystem
Your events
Participation and leads developed
Attending other events
Speaking engagements, leads developed
Counseling
Connecting resources
Soft Reporting
24. Requires a central data repository
Considerations:
Map metrics to your strategy
Use on campus and off campus data sources
Capture participants at all levels of involvement
Set expectations up front on reporting
Ongoing surveys
Ease of data collection matters
Gathering the Data
28. Interactive Exercise (30 minutes)
1) With your group, select one of the following 5 strategic goals
to focus on:
Enhance regional competitiveness
Equip our students to succeed in a fast-paced, global
economy
Achieve excellence in scholarship, from basic to applied
research, in strategic niches of expertise
Facilitate and incentivize multi-disciplinary collaborations
to solve our region’s most pressing challenges
Improve quality of life in our region
2) Develop 2-3 strategic objectives that explain how your group
would achieve that strategic goal
3) For one of these strategic goals, develop at least 3-4
operational objectives that would support these strategic
objectives
4) For at least 1 strategic objective and 1 operational objective,
develop an appropriate performance metric
29. Questions?
Feel free to contact us!
Maureen Klovers
President and CEO
Lyon Park Associates
maureen@lyonparkassociates.
com
(703) 527-2172
Felix DiCamillo
The Rochester Group
www.rochestergroup.com
fdicamillo@rochestergroup.com
(585) 271-1323 x229