1. The document discusses lessons learned from REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) programs and ways to improve their effectiveness.
2. It summarizes findings from the Global Comparative Study on REDD+ which assessed REDD+ policies and projects in 6 countries and found modest impacts on reducing deforestation and mixed effects on community well-being.
3. It argues that for REDD+ to be more effective, programs need to support large-scale reforms that incentivize conservation, economic efficiency, and government budgets, rather than remain as small projects. Impact assessments also need to better evaluate REDD+ outcomes.
Assessing progress in national REDD+ policy processesCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Monica Di Gregorio, M. Brockhaus, K. Korhonen-Kurki, J. Sehring, T. Cronin, S. Mardiah, L. Santoso, and E. Muharrom during the Forests Asia Summit in the discussion forum "Climate change: Low-emissions development and societal welfare - trade offs, risks and power struggles in forest and climate change policy arenas" focuses on the REDD Global Comparative Study (GCS), key policy challenges and regime types, how progress in REDD+ is actually defined and what conclusions can be drawn.
REDD+ subnational initiatives: Key findings of CIFOR case bookCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by William D. Sunderlin at "REDD+ Emerging? What we can learn from subnational initiatives", a CIFOR Official Side Event at COP 20 in Lima, Peru on Friday, 5 December.
REDD+ and its implementation in IndonesiaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Bimo Dwi Satrio, Senior Research Officer, CIFOR, at "Muda Bersuara 2021: Selamatkan generasi emas 2045 dari krisis iklim" by Foreign Policy Community Indonesia (FPCI) Chapter Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, on 6 August 2021
Indonesia’s Efforts in battling the Climate Change CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Djati W. Hadi (Head of Communication Bureau, MOEF) at "Webinar: If forests and peatlands disappeared, would humanity survive?", 21 August 2019.
Developing Sustainable Tourism through Social Entrepreneurshipijtsrd
The research was an effort to examine the relationship between social entrepreneurship SE and sustainable Tourism ST within the framework of India tourism. Thirdly, the study proposes a plan of motivating SEinside the industry. The methodology involves a case study mechanism or an approach that inculcates a systematic and comprehensive examination of associated literature to decide the situation of Indian tourism with reverence to sustainability. Findings revealed that there is inadequacy of SEprojects in context with India hospitality and tourism sector, lack of awareness is one of the major reasons for this. The learning has evaluated the circumstance in India and even though it was all inclusive within the environment of limited data accessibility. Further, the investigation makes three key commitments to the literature on sustainable hospitality and the tourism industry. First, It requires continues commitments of innovative social entrepreneurs, if the business is to turn out to be all the more extensively sustainable. Second, this research explores the degree of action needed in Indian tourism industry to understand whether its development and advantages are measurable. Manzoor Nabi Naikoo "Developing Sustainable Tourism through Social Entrepreneurship" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-5 , August 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd45189.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/other/45189/developing-sustainable-tourism-through-social-entrepreneurship/manzoor-nabi-naikoo
The State of Jurisdictional Sustainability: Synthesis for Practitioners and P...CIFOR-ICRAF
1) The document analyzes progress toward jurisdictional sustainability across 39 jurisdictions in the tropics. Deforestation has decreased in some jurisdictions like Aceh but increased in others like East Kalimantan.
2) Jurisdictions have made various commitments to reduce emissions and deforestation through international agreements. Progress implementing integrated low-emissions strategies varies across jurisdictions.
3) External support for jurisdictions has included over $2.3 billion in funding but more formal partnerships are still needed between governments and companies. The document provides recommendations to strengthen jurisdictional sustainability efforts.
Enabling private sector engagement for business-based peatlands restoration &...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Marcel J Silvius of the Global Green Growth Institute at the 3rd Asia-Pacific Rainforest Summit, on 23–25 April 2018 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Assessing progress in national REDD+ policy processesCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Monica Di Gregorio, M. Brockhaus, K. Korhonen-Kurki, J. Sehring, T. Cronin, S. Mardiah, L. Santoso, and E. Muharrom during the Forests Asia Summit in the discussion forum "Climate change: Low-emissions development and societal welfare - trade offs, risks and power struggles in forest and climate change policy arenas" focuses on the REDD Global Comparative Study (GCS), key policy challenges and regime types, how progress in REDD+ is actually defined and what conclusions can be drawn.
REDD+ subnational initiatives: Key findings of CIFOR case bookCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by William D. Sunderlin at "REDD+ Emerging? What we can learn from subnational initiatives", a CIFOR Official Side Event at COP 20 in Lima, Peru on Friday, 5 December.
REDD+ and its implementation in IndonesiaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Bimo Dwi Satrio, Senior Research Officer, CIFOR, at "Muda Bersuara 2021: Selamatkan generasi emas 2045 dari krisis iklim" by Foreign Policy Community Indonesia (FPCI) Chapter Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, on 6 August 2021
Indonesia’s Efforts in battling the Climate Change CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Djati W. Hadi (Head of Communication Bureau, MOEF) at "Webinar: If forests and peatlands disappeared, would humanity survive?", 21 August 2019.
Developing Sustainable Tourism through Social Entrepreneurshipijtsrd
The research was an effort to examine the relationship between social entrepreneurship SE and sustainable Tourism ST within the framework of India tourism. Thirdly, the study proposes a plan of motivating SEinside the industry. The methodology involves a case study mechanism or an approach that inculcates a systematic and comprehensive examination of associated literature to decide the situation of Indian tourism with reverence to sustainability. Findings revealed that there is inadequacy of SEprojects in context with India hospitality and tourism sector, lack of awareness is one of the major reasons for this. The learning has evaluated the circumstance in India and even though it was all inclusive within the environment of limited data accessibility. Further, the investigation makes three key commitments to the literature on sustainable hospitality and the tourism industry. First, It requires continues commitments of innovative social entrepreneurs, if the business is to turn out to be all the more extensively sustainable. Second, this research explores the degree of action needed in Indian tourism industry to understand whether its development and advantages are measurable. Manzoor Nabi Naikoo "Developing Sustainable Tourism through Social Entrepreneurship" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-5 , August 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd45189.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/other/45189/developing-sustainable-tourism-through-social-entrepreneurship/manzoor-nabi-naikoo
The State of Jurisdictional Sustainability: Synthesis for Practitioners and P...CIFOR-ICRAF
1) The document analyzes progress toward jurisdictional sustainability across 39 jurisdictions in the tropics. Deforestation has decreased in some jurisdictions like Aceh but increased in others like East Kalimantan.
2) Jurisdictions have made various commitments to reduce emissions and deforestation through international agreements. Progress implementing integrated low-emissions strategies varies across jurisdictions.
3) External support for jurisdictions has included over $2.3 billion in funding but more formal partnerships are still needed between governments and companies. The document provides recommendations to strengthen jurisdictional sustainability efforts.
Enabling private sector engagement for business-based peatlands restoration &...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Marcel J Silvius of the Global Green Growth Institute at the 3rd Asia-Pacific Rainforest Summit, on 23–25 April 2018 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
An introduction to CIFOR's global comparative study on REDD+ (GCS-REDD+)CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
This document discusses REDD+, a global program aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It provides background on REDD+, noting it was established at the UN climate conference in 2007. The document then summarizes research on REDD+, including findings that REDD+ initiatives have had some success in reducing deforestation but have shown mostly neutral impacts on livelihoods. It also notes that REDD+ funding has remained relatively small compared to emissions from deforestation. In conclusion, the document argues REDD+ still holds promise if given more funding and with improved program design.
This document summarizes a presentation on who will bear the costs of REDD+ based on evidence from subnational REDD+ initiatives. It finds that:
1) Smallholders and informal forest users are likely to bear significant opportunity costs, but their costs may not be recognized or compensated as they have minor roles without formal rights.
2) Many REDD+ country institutions, especially subnational governments, are already subsidizing REDD+ implementation costs in an effort to build readiness, generate non-carbon benefits, or meet climate commitments, but this support could "crowd out" non-state investment over time.
3) Understanding who bears the greatest costs requires considering multiple perspectives, as views on who bears
Avoiding deforestation and forest degradation under a new climate agreement: ...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview and summary of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) and its evolution. It discusses key aspects of the Paris Agreement in relation to forests and REDD+. It outlines the history and architecture of REDD+ and examines factors that can hinder or enable transformational change towards reducing deforestation. Finally, it discusses findings from CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on national REDD+ policies and processes in 14 countries.
This document summarizes several studies and analyses related to REDD+ programs:
- An analysis of 13 national REDD+ programs found that the 6 most successful cases had access to performance-based finance and strong national ownership. Countries without performance-based funding could still succeed if external commitment was high.
- A study of 6 countries and 23 subnational REDD+ initiatives involving 190 villages and 4,500 households found a mix of forest interventions being used, with enabling conditions and incentives being more common than disincentives.
- Another study found knowledge of and participation in REDD+ initiatives increasing among villages, women's groups, and households from 2010 to 2014.
Which policy, institutional and governance aspects are fostering or else hamp...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniella Schweizer, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and University of Sao Paulo at the World Conference on Ecological Restoration SER 2017 in Foz do Iguassu (Brazil) on August 29, 2017.
and CIFOR)
Enhancing transparency in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: Bringing...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Steven Lawry, Research Director for Governance, at the National Workshop on Translating Transparency Framework under the Paris Agreement into National Context, 26 January 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Presented by Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio and Thuy Thu Pham at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' on 23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
This presentation is a compilation of four that were given on 30 November 2011 at an official UNFCCC COP17 side-event organised by CIFOR: 'How is REDD+ unfolding on the ground?'. The event discussed early insights on the capability of REDD+ projects to deliver on their goal of sequestering forest carbon while providing a range of co-benefits. The information presented draws mainly on findings of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+, and covers the status and challenges of REDD+ projects on the ground;
challenges encountered in establishing REDD+ in Africa;
the policy and economic context in which REDD+ projects is unfolding; and
the status of monitoring, reporting and verification in setting up REDD+.
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy (CIFOR-ICRAF) at "Science and Public Policy Platform Dialogue I: REDD+ implementation in DRC after COP26 and the signing of the second Letter of Intent (LoI): Priorities, legal and policy frameworks and contributions of the GCS-REDD+ project" on 14 Dec 2021
Impact of REDD+ initiatives on local stakeholders’ income, wellbeing, and lan...CIFOR-ICRAF
By Claudio de Sassi and Christy Desta Pratama. Presentation for the “Understanding Transformational Change for REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia – Workshop and Policy Dialogue”. Jakarta, August 24 2015
Presented by Veronique (Niki) De Sy at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
What Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge ToolCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered at the third Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2016, in Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
The five sub-thematic streams at APFW 2016 included:
Pathways to prosperity: Future trade and markets
Tackling climate change: challenges and opportunities
Serving society: forestry and people
New institutions, new governance
Our green future: green investment and growing our natural assets
The document summarizes information from presentations given at a REDD+ conference in Durban, South Africa. It discusses the global distribution of REDD+ projects, strategies being tested by projects, issues around land tenure, and lessons learned from implementing REDD+ projects on the ground in Tanzania. Key challenges discussed include uncertainty in REDD+ policies, disconnects between REDD+ and other sectors, and ensuring benefits reach local communities.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or developing a separate mechanism.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or creating a separate mechanism.
Transforming REDD+ Lessons and new direction - at COP24CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) at the "GLF Climate Action in the Landscape" at COP24, Katowice, Poland (9 Dec 2018)
The Forests Dialogue (TFD) & IUCNREDD’s impact on Communities, Capacity and C...The Forests Dialogue
The document discusses The Forests Dialogue (TFD) and its work on REDD+. TFD is an initiative that aims to build understanding and find solutions to key forest issues through multi-stakeholder dialogue. It has conducted dialogues on REDD+ readiness in several countries. Some common challenges identified include: ensuring access to information for capacity building, establishing effective participation mechanisms, reforming policies around land and carbon rights, developing benefit sharing systems, and integrating REDD+ with other sector plans. TFD dialogues help countries discuss these issues and share experiences to strengthen national REDD+ processes.
An introduction to CIFOR's global comparative study on REDD+ (GCS-REDD+)CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
This document discusses REDD+, a global program aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It provides background on REDD+, noting it was established at the UN climate conference in 2007. The document then summarizes research on REDD+, including findings that REDD+ initiatives have had some success in reducing deforestation but have shown mostly neutral impacts on livelihoods. It also notes that REDD+ funding has remained relatively small compared to emissions from deforestation. In conclusion, the document argues REDD+ still holds promise if given more funding and with improved program design.
This document summarizes a presentation on who will bear the costs of REDD+ based on evidence from subnational REDD+ initiatives. It finds that:
1) Smallholders and informal forest users are likely to bear significant opportunity costs, but their costs may not be recognized or compensated as they have minor roles without formal rights.
2) Many REDD+ country institutions, especially subnational governments, are already subsidizing REDD+ implementation costs in an effort to build readiness, generate non-carbon benefits, or meet climate commitments, but this support could "crowd out" non-state investment over time.
3) Understanding who bears the greatest costs requires considering multiple perspectives, as views on who bears
Avoiding deforestation and forest degradation under a new climate agreement: ...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview and summary of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) and its evolution. It discusses key aspects of the Paris Agreement in relation to forests and REDD+. It outlines the history and architecture of REDD+ and examines factors that can hinder or enable transformational change towards reducing deforestation. Finally, it discusses findings from CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on national REDD+ policies and processes in 14 countries.
This document summarizes several studies and analyses related to REDD+ programs:
- An analysis of 13 national REDD+ programs found that the 6 most successful cases had access to performance-based finance and strong national ownership. Countries without performance-based funding could still succeed if external commitment was high.
- A study of 6 countries and 23 subnational REDD+ initiatives involving 190 villages and 4,500 households found a mix of forest interventions being used, with enabling conditions and incentives being more common than disincentives.
- Another study found knowledge of and participation in REDD+ initiatives increasing among villages, women's groups, and households from 2010 to 2014.
Which policy, institutional and governance aspects are fostering or else hamp...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniella Schweizer, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and University of Sao Paulo at the World Conference on Ecological Restoration SER 2017 in Foz do Iguassu (Brazil) on August 29, 2017.
and CIFOR)
Enhancing transparency in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: Bringing...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Steven Lawry, Research Director for Governance, at the National Workshop on Translating Transparency Framework under the Paris Agreement into National Context, 26 January 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Presented by Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio and Thuy Thu Pham at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' on 23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
This presentation is a compilation of four that were given on 30 November 2011 at an official UNFCCC COP17 side-event organised by CIFOR: 'How is REDD+ unfolding on the ground?'. The event discussed early insights on the capability of REDD+ projects to deliver on their goal of sequestering forest carbon while providing a range of co-benefits. The information presented draws mainly on findings of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+, and covers the status and challenges of REDD+ projects on the ground;
challenges encountered in establishing REDD+ in Africa;
the policy and economic context in which REDD+ projects is unfolding; and
the status of monitoring, reporting and verification in setting up REDD+.
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy (CIFOR-ICRAF) at "Science and Public Policy Platform Dialogue I: REDD+ implementation in DRC after COP26 and the signing of the second Letter of Intent (LoI): Priorities, legal and policy frameworks and contributions of the GCS-REDD+ project" on 14 Dec 2021
Impact of REDD+ initiatives on local stakeholders’ income, wellbeing, and lan...CIFOR-ICRAF
By Claudio de Sassi and Christy Desta Pratama. Presentation for the “Understanding Transformational Change for REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia – Workshop and Policy Dialogue”. Jakarta, August 24 2015
Presented by Veronique (Niki) De Sy at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
What Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge ToolCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered at the third Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2016, in Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
The five sub-thematic streams at APFW 2016 included:
Pathways to prosperity: Future trade and markets
Tackling climate change: challenges and opportunities
Serving society: forestry and people
New institutions, new governance
Our green future: green investment and growing our natural assets
The document summarizes information from presentations given at a REDD+ conference in Durban, South Africa. It discusses the global distribution of REDD+ projects, strategies being tested by projects, issues around land tenure, and lessons learned from implementing REDD+ projects on the ground in Tanzania. Key challenges discussed include uncertainty in REDD+ policies, disconnects between REDD+ and other sectors, and ensuring benefits reach local communities.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or developing a separate mechanism.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or creating a separate mechanism.
Transforming REDD+ Lessons and new direction - at COP24CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) at the "GLF Climate Action in the Landscape" at COP24, Katowice, Poland (9 Dec 2018)
The Forests Dialogue (TFD) & IUCNREDD’s impact on Communities, Capacity and C...The Forests Dialogue
The document discusses The Forests Dialogue (TFD) and its work on REDD+. TFD is an initiative that aims to build understanding and find solutions to key forest issues through multi-stakeholder dialogue. It has conducted dialogues on REDD+ readiness in several countries. Some common challenges identified include: ensuring access to information for capacity building, establishing effective participation mechanisms, reforming policies around land and carbon rights, developing benefit sharing systems, and integrating REDD+ with other sector plans. TFD dialogues help countries discuss these issues and share experiences to strengthen national REDD+ processes.
The REDD+ Policy Arena: where are the bridges and brokers ?CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Moira Moelino given at the Forests Asia Summit during the discussion forum "Climate change: Low-emissions development and societal welfare – trade offs, risks and power struggles in forest and climate change policy arenas" focuses on cross-scale information flows and mitigation and adaptation insights across sectors.
Moving from readiness to performance-based paymentsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by the GCS-REDD+ team of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) at the 3rd Asia-Pacific Rainforest Summit, on 23–25 April 2018 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
CIFOR and Global Comparative Study on REDD+CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the Knowledge Sharing Event "Sharing Insights Across REDD+ Countries" in Georgetown, Guyana, on June 6, 2017.
Global Comparative Study on REDD+ - The Project and ResultsCIFOR-ICRAF
The document summarizes the objectives and structure of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+ (GCS-REDD+). The study aims to support REDD+ policy and practice with science-based analysis and tools to help ensure REDD+ outcomes are effective, efficient, equitable, and provide co-benefits. It works in 12 countries conducting policy analysis and 6 countries with 23 REDD+ project sites analyzing impacts on 190 villages and 4,524 households. Key challenges discussed include addressing tenure issues, balancing local livelihoods and forest protection, meaningful community participation, and building technical capacity for monitoring and reference levels. International discussions are found to affect local implementation, and a "no regrets" agenda is proposed
Can REDD+ achieve its goals? Insights from research on forests and climate in...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview and analysis of research conducted by CIFOR on REDD+ initiatives in six tropical countries from 2009-2015. The research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and co-benefits of REDD+ initiatives. Key findings include: REDD+ has had limited effectiveness in reducing deforestation; initiatives face challenges in creating carbon accounting systems and national policies have progressed slowly; administrative costs vary significantly; benefits have not meaningfully improved incomes or reduced inequalities; tenure security and biodiversity co-benefits saw little improvement. While REDD+ has laid an important foundation, the research suggests it has not yet achieved its goals at a large scale, facing obstacles from slow policy progress and competing development
REDD+ Dynamics: [not] A one size fit all solutionCIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview of REDD+ dynamics and initiatives in several countries and continents. It summarizes REDD+ policy developments and institutional changes in Indonesia from 2008-2016. It also discusses REDD+ activities in Papua New Guinea, Vietnam, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Brazil, and Peru, highlighting their national REDD+ strategies, challenges, and progress. Common challenges facing REDD+ implementation include conflicting interests between development and conservation, unclear land tenure, and lack of long-term funding. The document concludes with priorities for REDD+ moving forward, including further integrating it within national development plans and addressing major drivers of deforestation.
The equity of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms? A multilevel governance analy...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document summarizes a research project analyzing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms in Vietnam. The project aims to provide policy guidance to improve REDD+ BSM design and implementation. It examines BSMs at national, subnational, and local levels in Vietnam, with a focus on the Payment for Forest Ecosystem Services program. Preliminary findings show strengths like clear land tenure but also weaknesses like lack of policy consistency and low local government capacity. Further research is needed to understand the interests of different government sectors and how top-down programs are perceived locally.
The document discusses the REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards Initiative, which aims to develop standards to ensure REDD+ programs effectively reduce emissions while respecting human rights, reducing poverty, and conserving biodiversity. The initiative seeks to help early adopters, encourage improved performance, and build global support. Standards will include principles, criteria, and indicators to guide REDD+ program policies, implementation, and outcomes. The initiative is currently testing standards in pilot countries and seeking broader adoption.
Opportunities and challenges to developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms i...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document discusses opportunities and challenges for developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms in developing countries. It identifies key issues such as governance arrangements, rights and tenure, monitoring and verification methods, stakeholder involvement, and measuring co-benefits. Designing equitable benefit sharing that incentivizes emissions reductions while recognizing local rights and costs will require balancing efficiency and equity considerations. The REDD+ Benefits Sharing project aims to provide guidance to improve benefit sharing mechanism design, development, and implementation.
Forests, People, and the rest of the world: local participation in REDD+ Meas...CIFOR-ICRAF
Community participation has been promoted as a way to empower local communities in REDD+ programs. A particular goal is that they would monitor forest change and measure carbon stocks, and thus reduce the costs of such assessments. So far, little empirical evidence shows that participatory measurement, reporting and verification (PMRV) is feasible. We present the main findings from a series of multidisciplinary studies published in a collection of PLOS ONE, investigating the feasibility of local participation into MRV in Indonesia, Ethiopia, Mexico and China.
Assessing redd+ readiness to maximize climate finance impactCIFOR-ICRAF
Originally presented by Christopher Martius at "Does money go to trees?: Assessing finance flows to maximize the impact of REDD+", an official SBSTA48 side event, presented by CIFOR, ICRAF and Wageningen University.
REDD+ in Indonesia: A project or a new mode of governance?CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Cynthia Maharani, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the Knowledge Sharing Event in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on May 29, 2017.
This document provides information on sustainable forest management. It defines sustainable forest management and describes its ecological, economic and social benefits. It also discusses some potential challenges to implementing sustainable forest management, such as implementation costs and conflicts between stakeholders. The document then discusses sustainable forest management policies and programs in India and other countries. It provides overviews of key international frameworks and mechanisms related to sustainable forest management, climate change and sustainable development.
Equity workshop: Evolution of equity discourses in REDD+IIED
Evolution of equity/fairness discourses in REDD+.
A presentation by Maria Brockhaus and partners, CGIAR, CIFOR.
This presentation was given at the Expert Workshop on Equity, Justice and Well-being in Ecosystem Governance, held at the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) in London, March, 2015.
REDD+ aims to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and foster conservation and sustainable forest management. It has opportunities to mainstream climate change actions and improve forest governance. However, it faces many challenges including strengthening institutions, ensuring participation and benefits for local communities, addressing issues around land and carbon tenure rights, financing, setting reference levels and implementing monitoring. Full implementation costs and addressing multiple stakeholder interests are also challenges. Capacity development and coordination are needed to realize REDD+ goals.
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Inputs for ASEAN regionCIFOR-ICRAF
The document summarizes a presentation on a global comparative study of REDD+ in the ASEAN region. It discusses the following key points in 3 sentences:
The project analyzed the impact of REDD+ programs through longitudinal household datasets and a database of REDD+ projects. Research found that REDD+ led to reductions in deforestation but also short-term declines in well-being and forest revenue. The presentation recommends diversifying REDD+ approaches, balancing market-based and grassroots programs, supporting experimentation, and fostering collaboration on REDD+ within ASEAN.
Similar to Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forward (20)
Mejorando la estimación de emisiones GEI conversión bosque degradado a planta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Kristell Hergoualc'h (Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Inclusión y transparencia como clave del éxito para el mecanismo de transfere...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Lauren Cooper and Rowenn Kalman (Michigan State University) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Avances de Perú con relación al marco de transparencia del Acuerdo de ParísCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Berioska Quispe Estrada (Directora General de Cambio Climático y Desertificación) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Land tenure and forest landscape restoration in Cameroon and MadagascarCIFOR-ICRAF
FLR is an adaptive process that brings people (including women, men, youth, local and indigenous communities) together to identify, negotiate and implement practices that restore and enhance ecological and social functionality of forest landscapes that have been deforested or degraded.
ReSI-NoC - Strategie de mise en oeuvre.pdfCIFOR-ICRAF
Re nforcer les S ystèmes d’ I nnovations
agrosylvopastorales économiquement
rentables, écologiquement durables et
socialement équitables dans la région du
No rd C ameroun
ReSI-NoC: Introduction au contexte du projetCIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les systèmes d’innovation agricole en vue de
promouvoir des systèmes de production agricole et
d’élevage économiquement rentables, écologiquement
durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord au Cameroun (ReSI-NoC)
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement renta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement rentables, écologiquement durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord Cameroun
Introducing Blue Carbon Deck seeking for actionable partnershipsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniel Murdiyarso (Principal Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
A Wide Range of Eco System Services with MangrovesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Mihyun Seol and Himlal Baral (CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Presented by Citra Gilang (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Peat land Restoration Project in HLG LonderangCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Hyoung Gyun Kim (Korea–Indonesia Forest Cooperation Center) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Sungsang Mangrove Restoration and Ecotourism (SMART): A participatory action ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Beni Okarda (Senior Research Officer, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Coastal and mangrove vulnerability assessment In the Northern Coast of Java, ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Phidju Marrin Sagala (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Carbon Stock Assessment in Banten Province and Demak, Central Java, IndonesiaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Milkah Royna (Student Intern, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Cooperative Mangrove Project: Introduction, Scope, and PerspectivesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Bora Lee (Warm-Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, NIFoS Jeju, Republic of Korea) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forward
1. TRANSFORMING REDD+
LESSONS LEARNED AND WAY FORWARD
Christopher Martius, Arild Angelsen, Stibniati Atmadja, Niki de Sy,
Thu Thuy Pham, Anne Larson, Amy Duchelle
c.martius@cgiar.org
Addis Ababa, 5 April 2019
2. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
3. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
5. Climate change context
• IPCC 1.5 degree report: immense and urgent
challenges and risks related to climate change
• a temperature rise of 2.0 °C is likely
Forestry:
• huge expectations globally - is the only carbon sink
• Bonn Challenge 350 million ha ecosystem restoration until 2030
• But costs and area demand are huge
• South Korea: restored 2 million ha of forest at cost of 3 billion $
• IPCC 1.5° report: For BECCS and afforestation together, land demand in 2100
is ca. 800-1800 million hectares, mainly converted from pasture land
What role can forestry realistically play?
6. Climate change mitigation role of afforestation
Relatively low potential but lowest costs
6
IPCC1.5degreereport,chapter4
Direct air capture and carbon storage
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Afforestation
7. http://redd.unfccc.int/uploads/2_94_redd_20150804_unredd_technical_considerations_frel_under_unfccc_en.pdf
The four key elements of REDD+ and related UNFCCC DecisionsThe five activities that
comprise REDD+
1. Reducing emissions
from deforestation
2. Reducing emissions
from forest degradation
3. Conservation of forest
carbon stocks
4. Sustainable
management of forests
5. Enhancement of forest
carbon stocks
Decision 1/CP.16, par.
70
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation
8. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
9. CIFOR’s Global Comparative Study of REDD+
• To support REDD+ policy
arenas and practitioner
communities with
• information
• analysis
• tools
• to ensure 3E+ outcomes
for REDD+:
• effectiveness (to
reach C and non-C
benefits)
• (cost-) efficiency
• equity
• + co-benefits
• towards
transformational change
Effective REDD+ policy
National and global policies,
measures and commitments
REDD+ performance
Rigorous assessment in 6 countries, 23
sites, 150 villages, 4,000+ households;
global overview
Integrating REDD+ in the landscape
Multilevel governance, stakeholder
platforms, development
Monitoring, Measuring, Reporting
and Verification
Baslines, reference levels, drivers, capacity
development
Partnerengagementanddissemination
2009 - 2020
12. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
13. REDD+ as a Theory of Change
• A Theory of Change (ToC) is a roadmap for
change
o It outlines how to build a successful societal
transformation
o It explains how and why an initiative works
o It maps a pathway from a project’s activities, via
its outputs, to its outcomes and impact
o It tells you where the gaps are
14. One early definition of REDD+ was…
“A core idea underlying REDD+ is to make performance-based
payments, that is, to pay forest owners and users to reduce
emissions and increase removals.
Such payment for environmental (or ecosystem) services (PES)
… provides strong incentives directly to forest owners and
users to manage forests better and clear less forestland.
PES will fully compensate carbon rights holders that find
forest conservation more lucrative than the alternatives. They
simply sell forest carbon credits and less cattle, coffee, cocoa
or charcoal.”
Angelsen et al. (2009)
15. REDD+ as a Theory of Change I – the original idea
16. REDD+ as a Theory of Change II – the ‚official‘ set-up
17. REDD+ misses some elements of a functional ToC
• Missing components : “power” of incentives; nature
and level of compensation; who the beneficiaries
should be; and the extent to which offsetting should
be permitted
• REDD+ as practiced on the ground has evolved into a
broad basket of adaptive, non-conditional activities
• More clarity is needed for donor-side actions and
commitments, and their role as catalysts of change
through (conditional) financial support
• One confusion arises when not distinguishing clearly
between the objective of reduced emissions
(REDD+), and the framework to achieve REDD+
• REDD+ has laudable broad objectives, but is also
entangled by them, and its success depends on
broad policy reform
• Implementation must become more realistic and
pragmatic, based on diagnosis and through
evidence-based policy making
18. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
19. REDD+ policy (collaboration) networks: influence and
coalition building in times of change
Research question and hypothesis
Tenure has become a central element in Indonesia’s REDD+
policymaking
• But is this reflected in the REDD+ policy networks?
• Can the network structure explain how tenure got high on the agenda?
2 Hypotheses:
a) Actors with a rights-based approach to REDD+ gained more
influence over time (higher reputation)
b) Actors with a rights-based approach to REDD+ strategically
build coalition with diverse and influential actors (less
centrality in network)
20. Policy Network Analysis: Research Methods
• Data collection in 2012 and 2015
• Identification of core organizations and policy events
• expert panel (GO, Private Sector, ENGO, rights-CSO, University,
international and national research)
• Social organization survey
• standard questionnaire to identify coalitions and network
structures (stances, reputational power, info, collaboration,
disagreement and financing networks)
• In-depth interview with actors using open ended questions
• UCINET
Actors:
• 2012: 102 identified, 65 responded to network survey: 64%
• 2015: 130 identified, 83 responded to network survey: 62%
• Overlap of 84 actors between round 1 and 2
21. FINDINGS: Influence
The more often an actor is mentioned as influential, the larger the node size
Network of influence
2012 2015
- AMAN among most influential actors in phase 2
- fewer government actors highly influential
22. FINDINGS: Collaboration
Collaboration Network
2012 2015
- More actors in the center
- Central actor such as AMAN,
HUMA, FWI, Kemitraan are pushing
for rights and climate justice
including tenure reform
- Ministry of Forests central actor, and
government agencies recognizing this
- But MoF also needs other
organizations for REDD+
implementation
23. What is in
this talk?
1. Global role of forests in mitigating climate change
2. Global Comparative Study on REDD+
3. REDD+ as a Theory of Change: What is missing?
4. Policy Network Analysis - Indonesia example
5. Summarizing REDD+ at the global level
24. SUMMARISING REDD+
(I)
Finance and building
blocks
• International funding (public & private)
remains scarce, and demand through carbon
markets is lacking
• USD 1.1 – 2.7 billion/year in international
REDD+ funding
• Fact that REDD+ governments and
communities cover many of the costs
is not acknowledged
• Results-based payment -REDD+’s key
feature- largely untested at scale
• Funding
• Complex
• Anecdotal evidence on the impacts of
REDD+ finance on national policies
25. SUMMARISING REDD+ (II)
Shaping up
Positive intermediate outputs
& outcomes
• REDD+ helped forests gain prominence on
international and some national policy agendas
• 50+ countries put REDD+ in NDCs and have national
REDD+ strategies
• major coordination and implementation issues
remain
• National REDD+ initiatives improved countries’
monitoring capacities and understanding of drivers
• Increased stakeholder involvement, and platforms to
secure indigenous and community land rights
• 350 REDD+ projects, covering 43 million ha
• Jurisdictional approaches now covering 28% of tropical
forests
26. SUMMARISING REDD+ (III)
Modest impacts
• National REDD+ policies:
• most show some statistically significant reductions,
but small effect size
• Local REDD+ initiatives:
• modest but positive outcomes for forests
• Well-being impacts limited and mixed
• more likely positive when incentive components are
included
• Similar to the micro-macro paradox of development aid
• crowding out, leakage, too small
27. How can REDD+ be more effective? (I)
Big and bold initiatives needed
• International finance nudges ….
• … but domestic incentives decide
• Redesigning economics incentives for a triple win:
• conserve forests
• increase economic efficiency
• improve government budget balance
• Examples
• Brazil’s drastic deforestation reduction post-2004
• India’s ecological fiscal transfers (USD 7-12 billion annually)
• Ethiopia restoration plans
• How can we avoid project-ification, and make REDD+ support these reforms?
28. How can REDD+ be
more effective? (II)
A positive, exciting narrative
on forests
• The iron law of climate
policy (Arild Angelsen):
• If a conflict climate –
economic development,
climate loses
• Make forests part of a
green/sustainable economic
development strategy
• Examples:
• 1/5 of local income from
forests (PEN study)
• Forests as bio-pumps and
‘aerial rivers’
29. How can REDD+ be more effective? (III)
Be brave and assess impacts
• Few studies
• Impact assessment is not story-telling by donors, proponents or
beneficiaries … but a set of rigorous approaches; the main problem being
to estimate the counterfactual
• Impact assessment is not an afterthought; design and collect data from
day 1
• It is risky for proponents: no control of the result and hence, verdict on
your actions
We simply need to know more about what works and what doesn’t
30. Why are there not more
impact assessments?
3 hypotheses
People do not see the benefits?
• Proponents with strong faith in own
approach & success
• “One can easily see if it works or not”
Costs are high and the work, complex?
• Data collection: baselines, controls
• Need to hire experts
• Randomisation of treatments is ethically
problematic
Risks are high?
• No control of the result, and hence, the
verdict
• Negative assessment may jeopardize
future funding
31. REDD+ as a learning
experience
• The question is not:
“should we continue with REDD+
or not”?
• But rather:
“What have we learned that can
make our effort to reduce forest
emissions more effective,
efficient and equitable?”
• Both, dismissing REDD+,
and telling unfounded
success stories,
prevent that learning
• The writing of lessons
learned has just begun
The countries GCS works in, and some major outputs of CIFOR’s global comparative study
Read the lines
The data collection were conducted in 2012 for the first phase and 2015 for the second phase.
We are indentifying core organisations and policy events through expert panel that representing Government organizations, private sector, ENGO, and….)
Then we are conducting social organization survey to identify coalitions and networks structures.
Then the survey was supported by actor’s in depth interview with list of open ended questions.
We are using UCINET to draw to calculate and draw the network. Some calculation also done through R with help from our colleague. We identified 102 policy actors. However, due to confidentially issues and scheduling conflicts, we were only able to interview 65 included in our network analysis.
Comparing results from two surveys on policy networks, in 2012 and 2015, we identified changes in the actors networks related to influence, information exchange, and collaboration. We investigate how power relations have changed over time, and discuss what this means for the future of REDD+.
REDD+ is seen as involving inclusive, multisectoral and multidisciplinary policy processes. Although state agencies are perceived as the most influential, the Indonesian policy arena is populated by diverse actors. Figure 1 shows the number of times actors are named by other actors
as influential in national REDD+ policymaking. It shows that a group of government agencies is considered most influential (see the blue oval in Figure 1). Thus, while there is a trend towards a more open government, multistakeholder consultations and multilevel governance, the government,
understandably, is seen as ultimately responsible for public policy decisions. The Ministry of Forestry ( MoF) derives its power by virtue of controlling most forestland, bringing REDD+ under its jurisdiction. Recently, however, its central role in the policy arena has been challenged. Local governments are exerting their autonomy and pressuring the national government
to allow conversion of forest to other land uses. In response to a suit brought by four district heads in late 2011, the constitutional court declared that Article 1, Paragraph 3 of the Forestry Law of 1999, defining a forest area as ‘designated’ rather than gazetted by the Minister of Forestry, is unconstitutional. Although the forest areas delineated in the 1980s are still considered legally valid, most forest areas have not yet been gazetted and therefore can now be easily disputed (Arizona et al. 2012). Local communities, supported by NGOs, have also become more assertive in claiming land. Nevertheless, the MoF retains formal rights to control forest
areas and has issued regulations on the implementation of REDD+. Due to its long‑standing procedures, the MoF tends toward a business‑as‑usual paradigm, reflected in its appropriation of the concession model used for
timber extraction for conservation and eco‑tourism. REDD+, however, is a new approach requiring changes in attitudes, discourse and power relations, independent of the business‑as‑usual drivers of deforestation and forest degradation (Brockhaus and Angelsen 2012). The President established the National Council for Climate Change (DNPI) and the Task force on REDD+ to coordinate REDD+ policymaking and implementation, and these institutions clearly also have considerable influence on REDD+ in the country. They are, nevertheless, both outside the formal bureaucracy and therefore cannot operate without the support of more established agencies. As
a result of this institutional interdependence, effective REDD+ policymaking in Indonesia requires transparent and accountable cooperation among a diverse group of public and private organizations.
In 2015, the second figure shows the difference between the most influential and the lesser highly influential has decreased. The core of most influential actors now includes NORAD, AMAN and CIFOR replacing the disbanded UKP4 and DNPI.
in 2015, this prominence is shared among government organizations, a foreign donor organization, an NGO and an international research organization.
State agencies such as MOEF, Bappenas, KemenAgBn still the most influential power but other actors are gaining influential power. NORAD through their activity in fundings the redd+, cifor through their GCS REDD+ study. The most interesting is that AMAN, the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago, gaining influence pushing tenure agenda into the debate.
Such a shift could reflect a new openness of the State, to, among others, civil society calls for rights based approaches. REDD+ in Indonesia would then be one arena where this openness is applied. Alternatively, these results may indicate that REDD+ is no longer a priority and the state withdraws from efforts to tackle the political economy of deforestation to REDD+. To ensure progress on different agendas, tenure and avoided large-scale deforestation and hence realize emissions reductions, it will be important to flag the mutual benefits among the two (or more) agendas, that together might lead to the desired transformations in and beyond the forestry sector towards an effective, efficient, and equitable forest governance.
In phase 1, year 2011, the MoF (1), emerges as the central actor in mutually recognized collaboration among government agencies. As explained earlier, despite emerging challenges, the MoF holds the mandate to administer all forest areas. REDD+ can therefore only be implemented through collaboration or permit from the MoF, which does not
necessarily mean that MoF sees an organization as collaborator. Of course, REDD+ cannot be implemented by the MoF alone but requires collaborating with others, but despite this collaboration occurs mostly among same type of organizations.
Meanwhile in phase 2 year of 2015, collaboration is no longer between same type organization. Less homophily is observed in the network. However, does it means more coordination? Central actor such as AMAN, HUMA, FWI, Kemitraan are pushing for rights and climate justice including tenure reform. NGOS the new power, or REDD+ to unimportant.