©2015 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved 1GRF360
Sean Ianchulev, MD MPH
Chief Medical Officer, Transcend Medical
Clinical Associate Professor, UC San Francisco
What next?
2©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS
• Novel aqueous outflow enhancement: non-trabecular
• Supraciliary vs trabecular stenting
• Ab interno, non-perforating, no bleb, no MMC
CyPass
3©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass
CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS
• Novel aqueous outflow enhancement: non-trabecular
• Supraciliary vs trabecular stenting
• Ab-interno, non-perforating, no bleb, no MMC
4©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS
Continuous, absorptive reservoir
Single point access to the suprachoroidal
continuum with up to 160x more surface area vs
the trabecular meshwork2,3
Robust pressure gradient
Pressure differential between anterior chamber
and suprachoroidal space is 4 mmHg (at
physiological range)1
1. Emi K, Pederson JE, Toris CB. Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space. IOVS. 30(2):233-238
2. Patel SR, Lin ASP, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery to the Back of the Eye Using Hollow Microneedles. Pharm Res 2011
January;28(1):166–176
3. Internal analysis – Grierson (1979). BJO. 63:9-16; Olsen (1998). Am J Ophth. 125:237-241.
Anterior chamber
Supraciliary space
Suprachoroidal space
PRESSURE GRADIENT
5©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS
• 3000 Cases worldwide
• Largest MIGS FDA trial complete
• Filed PMA with FDA (October 2015)
6©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
Concept Feasibility Development Validation
2005 2015
3000+ Cases
Pilot COMBO and
POAG
Complete
100
COMPASS
US-IDE RCT
Combined
Complete
505
CYCLE
EU Post-Market
Combined &
POAG
Complete
500+
DUETTE
EU Post-Market
POAG
65
Complete
VISCOPASS
OUS Feasibility
Study POAG
Ongoing
135
7©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass Clinical Outcomes: Mild –Moderate Glaucoma
25.5
16.9 16.6 15.8
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Baseline M6 M12 M24
MeanIOP(mmHg)
Reduction: -35%
With Phaco
CyCle Study
CyPass Only
DUETTE Study
24.5
17.7
16.8
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
BL (n=65) M6 (n=52) M12 (n=48)
MeanIOP(mmHg)
Reduction: -32%
8©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
CyPass Clinical Outcomes: Safety
Adverse Events n (%)
Hypotony Maculopathy 0 (0)
Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage 0 (0)
Other Retinal Complications 0 (0)
Retinal Detachment 0 (0)
Explanted Device 1 (0.7)
Device Repositioning 1 (0.7)
Iris Atrophy 0 (0)
Endophthalmitis 0 (0)
Adverse Events n (%)
Iritis >1M 1 (0.7)
Hypotony >1M (<6 mmHg) 0 (0)
IOP Increase >1M 4 (2.9)
Transient Hyphema <1M 2 (1.5)
Anterior Chamber Shallowing 0 (0)
Endothelial Touch 5 (3.7)
Peripheral Anterior Synechia
with partial or complete obstruction
12 (8.8)
BCVA Loss > 2 lines 0 (0)
Early Terminations (N=28)
• Secondary glaucoma surgery (N=15)
• Death (N=5)
• Subject’s decision (N=5)
• Other/Unspecified (N=3)
CyCLE study: CyPass combined with phaco, 24M (n=136)
9©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
COMPASS trial
• Terminal wash out at 12 and 24 months
• Strict criteria for re-introduction of meds
• Rigorous analysis of endothelial cell density
• Strong primary endpoint outcome: 2-year diurnal un-medicated
IOP change
N = 240
COMPASS trialN = 505
iStent trial
N = 276 ABC trial
N = 212 TVT trial
N = 255 EMGT trial
10©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
Next Generation Technology: CyPass Vx
11©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
Mild Severe
360° Glaucoma Rx Spectrum
Moderate
CyPass CyPass Vx
12©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
Preliminary Analysis of ViscoPass 1-YR Results
-7.0
± 4.2
-8.7
± 7.8
-9.9
± 5.8
-12.0
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
CyPass only
(n=21)
CyPass + 30 uL
(n=21)
CyPass + 60 uL
(n=21)
IntraocularPressureDifference,mmHg
Paired Mean ± SD Change in IOP, by group, Baseline to 12M timepoint
13©2014 Transcend Medical All Rights Reserved
Efficacy in Mild-Severe Glaucoma
MIGS Safety Profile
No Bleb Yes
Yes
Yes
CYPASS
The Perfect MIGS Procedure
GonioFree Yes
Phaco + Yes
Best-in-class Validation (PMA) Yes

Transcend Medical

  • 1.
    ©2015 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved 1GRF360 Sean Ianchulev, MD MPH Chief Medical Officer, Transcend Medical Clinical Associate Professor, UC San Francisco What next?
  • 2.
    2©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS • Novel aqueous outflow enhancement: non-trabecular • Supraciliary vs trabecular stenting • Ab interno, non-perforating, no bleb, no MMC CyPass
  • 3.
    3©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS • Novel aqueous outflow enhancement: non-trabecular • Supraciliary vs trabecular stenting • Ab-interno, non-perforating, no bleb, no MMC
  • 4.
    4©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS Continuous, absorptive reservoir Single point access to the suprachoroidal continuum with up to 160x more surface area vs the trabecular meshwork2,3 Robust pressure gradient Pressure differential between anterior chamber and suprachoroidal space is 4 mmHg (at physiological range)1 1. Emi K, Pederson JE, Toris CB. Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space. IOVS. 30(2):233-238 2. Patel SR, Lin ASP, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery to the Back of the Eye Using Hollow Microneedles. Pharm Res 2011 January;28(1):166–176 3. Internal analysis – Grierson (1979). BJO. 63:9-16; Olsen (1998). Am J Ophth. 125:237-241. Anterior chamber Supraciliary space Suprachoroidal space PRESSURE GRADIENT
  • 5.
    5©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass Supraciliary Stenting: Next Generation MIGS • 3000 Cases worldwide • Largest MIGS FDA trial complete • Filed PMA with FDA (October 2015)
  • 6.
    6©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved Concept Feasibility Development Validation 2005 2015 3000+ Cases Pilot COMBO and POAG Complete 100 COMPASS US-IDE RCT Combined Complete 505 CYCLE EU Post-Market Combined & POAG Complete 500+ DUETTE EU Post-Market POAG 65 Complete VISCOPASS OUS Feasibility Study POAG Ongoing 135
  • 7.
    7©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass Clinical Outcomes: Mild –Moderate Glaucoma 25.5 16.9 16.6 15.8 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Baseline M6 M12 M24 MeanIOP(mmHg) Reduction: -35% With Phaco CyCle Study CyPass Only DUETTE Study 24.5 17.7 16.8 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 BL (n=65) M6 (n=52) M12 (n=48) MeanIOP(mmHg) Reduction: -32%
  • 8.
    8©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved CyPass Clinical Outcomes: Safety Adverse Events n (%) Hypotony Maculopathy 0 (0) Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage 0 (0) Other Retinal Complications 0 (0) Retinal Detachment 0 (0) Explanted Device 1 (0.7) Device Repositioning 1 (0.7) Iris Atrophy 0 (0) Endophthalmitis 0 (0) Adverse Events n (%) Iritis >1M 1 (0.7) Hypotony >1M (<6 mmHg) 0 (0) IOP Increase >1M 4 (2.9) Transient Hyphema <1M 2 (1.5) Anterior Chamber Shallowing 0 (0) Endothelial Touch 5 (3.7) Peripheral Anterior Synechia with partial or complete obstruction 12 (8.8) BCVA Loss > 2 lines 0 (0) Early Terminations (N=28) • Secondary glaucoma surgery (N=15) • Death (N=5) • Subject’s decision (N=5) • Other/Unspecified (N=3) CyCLE study: CyPass combined with phaco, 24M (n=136)
  • 9.
    9©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved COMPASS trial • Terminal wash out at 12 and 24 months • Strict criteria for re-introduction of meds • Rigorous analysis of endothelial cell density • Strong primary endpoint outcome: 2-year diurnal un-medicated IOP change N = 240 COMPASS trialN = 505 iStent trial N = 276 ABC trial N = 212 TVT trial N = 255 EMGT trial
  • 10.
    10©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved Next Generation Technology: CyPass Vx
  • 11.
    11©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved Mild Severe 360° Glaucoma Rx Spectrum Moderate CyPass CyPass Vx
  • 12.
    12©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved Preliminary Analysis of ViscoPass 1-YR Results -7.0 ± 4.2 -8.7 ± 7.8 -9.9 ± 5.8 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 CyPass only (n=21) CyPass + 30 uL (n=21) CyPass + 60 uL (n=21) IntraocularPressureDifference,mmHg Paired Mean ± SD Change in IOP, by group, Baseline to 12M timepoint
  • 13.
    13©2014 Transcend MedicalAll Rights Reserved Efficacy in Mild-Severe Glaucoma MIGS Safety Profile No Bleb Yes Yes Yes CYPASS The Perfect MIGS Procedure GonioFree Yes Phaco + Yes Best-in-class Validation (PMA) Yes