TMJ DISC DERANGEMENTS
INDICATIONS,GOALS AND OUTCOME
ASSESSMENT
JAMEEL KIFAYATULLAH
INDICATIONS
1) Moderate to severe pain
a) Localised TMJ pain
b) Preauricular pain
c) referred pain(e.g otalgia)
2) Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of
the following:
a) restricted range of motion
b) excessive range of motion
c) joint noises
d) Abnormal masticatory function
3) Imaging evidence of disc derangement
4) Arthroscopic evidence of disc derangement
Goals for surgery of TMJ disc
displacement
1) Relief or reduction of TMJ pain
2) Limited period of disablility
3) Improved range of jaw motion and /or function
4) Elimination or reduction of noise in the joint
5) Appropriate understanding by patient of
treatment options and acceptance of treatment
plan
6) Appropriate understanding and acceptance by
the patient of favorable outcomes and known
risk and complications
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT
1) a level of pain that is of little or no concern to the
patient, preferably measure objectively(e.g visual
analog scale)
2) improved mandibular function that is compatible with
mastication,deglutition,speech and oral hygiene.
3) a stable occlusion
4) acceptable clinical appearance(e.g absence of motor
deficits,absence of hypertrophic scar formation etc)
5)limited period of disability
6) Patient acceptance of procedure and understanding of
outcomes

Tmj disc derangements

  • 1.
    TMJ DISC DERANGEMENTS INDICATIONS,GOALSAND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT JAMEEL KIFAYATULLAH
  • 2.
    INDICATIONS 1) Moderate tosevere pain a) Localised TMJ pain b) Preauricular pain c) referred pain(e.g otalgia) 2) Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: a) restricted range of motion b) excessive range of motion c) joint noises d) Abnormal masticatory function 3) Imaging evidence of disc derangement 4) Arthroscopic evidence of disc derangement
  • 3.
    Goals for surgeryof TMJ disc displacement 1) Relief or reduction of TMJ pain 2) Limited period of disablility 3) Improved range of jaw motion and /or function 4) Elimination or reduction of noise in the joint 5) Appropriate understanding by patient of treatment options and acceptance of treatment plan 6) Appropriate understanding and acceptance by the patient of favorable outcomes and known risk and complications
  • 4.
    OUTCOME ASSESSMENT 1) alevel of pain that is of little or no concern to the patient, preferably measure objectively(e.g visual analog scale) 2) improved mandibular function that is compatible with mastication,deglutition,speech and oral hygiene. 3) a stable occlusion 4) acceptable clinical appearance(e.g absence of motor deficits,absence of hypertrophic scar formation etc) 5)limited period of disability 6) Patient acceptance of procedure and understanding of outcomes