Edit Gorogh & Tony Ross-Hellauer give insights on OpenUp & OpenAIRE research in alternative peer review services and methods | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Peer review at the crossroads
Workshop overview:
The workshop builds on the results of the OpenUp landscape scan and the OpenAIRE report on open peer review. The workshop has multiple purposes including (1) assessing existing and evolving methods and functions of alternative peer review mechanisms, (2) breaking down peer review into the basic processes to identify the benefits and challenges, and (3) identifying questions and issues that need further investigation.
Group discussions will also touch upon issues such as the sustainability, long-term availability of alternative review tools, and their uptake by researchers, and the incorporation of these methods into institutional, national, funders’ and publishers’ policies.
OpenUP and OpenAIRE are dedicated to engage with different (disciplinary, inter-disciplinary) research communities from the social sciences, life sciences, energy, arts and humanities to identify the requirements from the emerging trends as posed by Open Science and e-infrastructural interconnected environments. Both projects aim at developing a sustainable framework that is relevant for and responsive to the Open Science needs.
DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 6
1 Do You Speak Open Science Resources and Tips to LearVannaJoy20
1
Do You Speak Open Science? Resources and Tips to Learn the Language.
Paola Masuzzo1, 2 - ORCID: 0000-0003-3699-1195, Lennart Martens1,2 - ORCID: 0000-
0003-4277-658X
Author Affiliation
1 Medical Biotechnology Center, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
2 Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
The internet era, large-scale computing and storage resources, mobile devices, social media,
and their high uptake among different groups of people, have all deeply changed the way knowledge
is created, communicated, and further deployed. These advances have enabled a radical
transformation of the practice of science, which is now more open, more global and collaborative,
and closer to society than ever. Open science has therefore become an increasingly important topic.
Moreover, as open science is actively pursued by several high-profile funders and institutions, it
has fast become a crucial matter to all researchers. However, because this widespread interest in
open science has emerged relatively recently, its definition and implementation are constantly
shifting and evolving, sometimes leaving researchers in doubt about how to adopt open science,
and which are the best practices to follow.
This article therefore aims to be a field guide for scientists who want to perform science in the
open, offering resources and tips to make open science happen in the four key areas of data, code,
publications and peer-review.
The Rationale for Open Science: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
One of the most widely used definitions of open science originates from Michael Nielsen [1]:
“Open science is the idea that scientific knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as
is practical in the discovery process”. With this in mind, the overall goal of open science is to
accelerate scientific progress and discoveries and to turn these discoveries into benefits for all. An
essential part of this process is therefore to guarantee that all sorts of scientific outputs are publicly
available, easily accessible, and discoverable for others to use, re-use, and build upon.
As Mick Watson has recently wondered, “[...] isn’t that just science?” [2]. One of the basic
premises of science is that it should be based on a global, collaborative effort, building on open
communication of published methods, data, and results. In fact, the concept of discovering truth by
building on previous findings can be traced back to at least the 12th century in the metaphor of
dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants: “Nanos gigantum humeris insidentes”1.
While creativity and intuition are contributed to science by individuals, validation and
confirmation of scientific findings can only be reached through collaborative efforts, notably peer-
driven quality control and cross-validation. Through open inspection and critical, collective
analysis, models can be refined, improved, or rejected ...
As part of a webinar series on Open Research in Ireland, the National Open Research Forum (NORF) presented a webinar focused on Open Access to research publications on 4 May 2021. This presentation on the French national Open Access policy was delivered by Marin Dacos (Open Science Advisor, French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation).
Edit Gorogh & Tony Ross-Hellauer give insights on OpenUp & OpenAIRE research in alternative peer review services and methods | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Peer review at the crossroads
Workshop overview:
The workshop builds on the results of the OpenUp landscape scan and the OpenAIRE report on open peer review. The workshop has multiple purposes including (1) assessing existing and evolving methods and functions of alternative peer review mechanisms, (2) breaking down peer review into the basic processes to identify the benefits and challenges, and (3) identifying questions and issues that need further investigation.
Group discussions will also touch upon issues such as the sustainability, long-term availability of alternative review tools, and their uptake by researchers, and the incorporation of these methods into institutional, national, funders’ and publishers’ policies.
OpenUP and OpenAIRE are dedicated to engage with different (disciplinary, inter-disciplinary) research communities from the social sciences, life sciences, energy, arts and humanities to identify the requirements from the emerging trends as posed by Open Science and e-infrastructural interconnected environments. Both projects aim at developing a sustainable framework that is relevant for and responsive to the Open Science needs.
DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 6
1 Do You Speak Open Science Resources and Tips to LearVannaJoy20
1
Do You Speak Open Science? Resources and Tips to Learn the Language.
Paola Masuzzo1, 2 - ORCID: 0000-0003-3699-1195, Lennart Martens1,2 - ORCID: 0000-
0003-4277-658X
Author Affiliation
1 Medical Biotechnology Center, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
2 Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
The internet era, large-scale computing and storage resources, mobile devices, social media,
and their high uptake among different groups of people, have all deeply changed the way knowledge
is created, communicated, and further deployed. These advances have enabled a radical
transformation of the practice of science, which is now more open, more global and collaborative,
and closer to society than ever. Open science has therefore become an increasingly important topic.
Moreover, as open science is actively pursued by several high-profile funders and institutions, it
has fast become a crucial matter to all researchers. However, because this widespread interest in
open science has emerged relatively recently, its definition and implementation are constantly
shifting and evolving, sometimes leaving researchers in doubt about how to adopt open science,
and which are the best practices to follow.
This article therefore aims to be a field guide for scientists who want to perform science in the
open, offering resources and tips to make open science happen in the four key areas of data, code,
publications and peer-review.
The Rationale for Open Science: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
One of the most widely used definitions of open science originates from Michael Nielsen [1]:
“Open science is the idea that scientific knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as
is practical in the discovery process”. With this in mind, the overall goal of open science is to
accelerate scientific progress and discoveries and to turn these discoveries into benefits for all. An
essential part of this process is therefore to guarantee that all sorts of scientific outputs are publicly
available, easily accessible, and discoverable for others to use, re-use, and build upon.
As Mick Watson has recently wondered, “[...] isn’t that just science?” [2]. One of the basic
premises of science is that it should be based on a global, collaborative effort, building on open
communication of published methods, data, and results. In fact, the concept of discovering truth by
building on previous findings can be traced back to at least the 12th century in the metaphor of
dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants: “Nanos gigantum humeris insidentes”1.
While creativity and intuition are contributed to science by individuals, validation and
confirmation of scientific findings can only be reached through collaborative efforts, notably peer-
driven quality control and cross-validation. Through open inspection and critical, collective
analysis, models can be refined, improved, or rejected ...
As part of a webinar series on Open Research in Ireland, the National Open Research Forum (NORF) presented a webinar focused on Open Access to research publications on 4 May 2021. This presentation on the French national Open Access policy was delivered by Marin Dacos (Open Science Advisor, French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation).
Open Science - Paradigm Shift or Revival of Old Ideas?Heidi Laine
Slides for a lecture held as part of a course on Science and Society, organized by the University of Helsinki Doctoral School HYMY during spring semester 2016.
Libraries Advocating for Open Access: Best Practices and Lessons LearntIryna Kuchma
Best practices and lessons learnt from national and institutional open access (OA) advocacy campaigns in EIFL partner countries to reach out to research communities. Recommendations are based on 11 case studies showcasing successful national and institutional campaigns in Eastern Europe and Africa (in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Ukraine, Botswana, Ghana, Malawi, Sudan and Zimbabwe). The campaigns resulted in increased understanding and awareness about OA. Most transferable elements that made the projects succeed (strategies, tactics and tools) are described.
What is Open Science and what role does it play in Development?Leslie Chan
What is Open Science and what role does it play in Development?
The talk begins with a review of current understanding of open science and its alleged role in providing new opportunities for addressing long-standing development challenges. I then introduce the newly launched Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network, funded by IDRC Canada, and in collaboration with iHub Nairobi, Kenya. The rationale, funding modalities, and the short and long term objectives of the network will be discussed.
Open Cultures and Open Innovation - Open Science STS Course 2015Katja Mayer
The notion of Open Science is enjoying great popularity at the moment, some even go so far to call it "the better science". The European Union has recently adopted the term Open Science in its research framework programme, however negotiations about benefits and challenges of Open Science take place in many different arenas. In general, Open Science demands the highest possible transparency, accountability, and shareability in knowledge production, as well as the participation of all relevant stakeholders in the scientific process.In this seminar we will be looking at the diversity of Open Knowledge cultures in science and humanities.
Discussing ideal and actual realms of Open Science practices we will approach aspects such as Open Access, Open Research Data, Open Education, Open Evaluation, Citizen Science and Open Innovation from several perspectives, drawing on literature from stakeholders such as science, policy, science administration, technology, NGOs and Open Science activists. The objective is to understand Open Science situated within the movement of Open Cultures, therefore investigating its promising roles as change maker both in traditional academic settings and in society at large. The focus will be particularly on exchanges and translations of practices of science in society and respective epistemic politics.
Besides, the seminar aims at introducing Open Science as a set of practices to students to let them explore options for their own studies and theses.
I. Introduction to scholarly publishing
II. How to get published? Practical Advices
III. Structuring your article
IV. The reviewing process
V. How not to Publish
VI. Get noticed
Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research. A s...Birute Railiene
Birute Railiene. Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research : a survey of perception and demand
Paper for the 5th International Conference of the European Society of History of Science, Athens, 1-3 November 2012
Presentació a càrrec de Lluís Anglada, director de Ciència Oberta al CSUC, duta a terme a la Training Session on Open Science and Open Access al Centre de Recerca Matemàtica de la UAB l'11 de novembre de 2018
Presentation by CLACSO, academic network of 616 social science research institutions in 47 countries, at OAI10 (CERN-UNIGE, Geneva, 21-23 June 2017), about the world landscape of repositories and regional repositories networks, its achievements and challenges, and the importance of open access being managed as a commons by the scholarly community
Presentation for CLACSO, academic network of 616 social science research institutions in 47 countries, at OAI10 (CERN-UNIGE, Geneva, 21-23 June 2017), about the world landscape of repositories and regional repositories networks, its achievements and challenges, and the importance of open access being managed as a commons by the scholarly community
OSFair2017 Workshop | Next generation repositories – moving from the “fringe”...Open Science Fair
Kathleen Shearer talks about next generation repositories | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
Open Science - Paradigm Shift or Revival of Old Ideas?Heidi Laine
Slides for a lecture held as part of a course on Science and Society, organized by the University of Helsinki Doctoral School HYMY during spring semester 2016.
Libraries Advocating for Open Access: Best Practices and Lessons LearntIryna Kuchma
Best practices and lessons learnt from national and institutional open access (OA) advocacy campaigns in EIFL partner countries to reach out to research communities. Recommendations are based on 11 case studies showcasing successful national and institutional campaigns in Eastern Europe and Africa (in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Ukraine, Botswana, Ghana, Malawi, Sudan and Zimbabwe). The campaigns resulted in increased understanding and awareness about OA. Most transferable elements that made the projects succeed (strategies, tactics and tools) are described.
What is Open Science and what role does it play in Development?Leslie Chan
What is Open Science and what role does it play in Development?
The talk begins with a review of current understanding of open science and its alleged role in providing new opportunities for addressing long-standing development challenges. I then introduce the newly launched Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network, funded by IDRC Canada, and in collaboration with iHub Nairobi, Kenya. The rationale, funding modalities, and the short and long term objectives of the network will be discussed.
Open Cultures and Open Innovation - Open Science STS Course 2015Katja Mayer
The notion of Open Science is enjoying great popularity at the moment, some even go so far to call it "the better science". The European Union has recently adopted the term Open Science in its research framework programme, however negotiations about benefits and challenges of Open Science take place in many different arenas. In general, Open Science demands the highest possible transparency, accountability, and shareability in knowledge production, as well as the participation of all relevant stakeholders in the scientific process.In this seminar we will be looking at the diversity of Open Knowledge cultures in science and humanities.
Discussing ideal and actual realms of Open Science practices we will approach aspects such as Open Access, Open Research Data, Open Education, Open Evaluation, Citizen Science and Open Innovation from several perspectives, drawing on literature from stakeholders such as science, policy, science administration, technology, NGOs and Open Science activists. The objective is to understand Open Science situated within the movement of Open Cultures, therefore investigating its promising roles as change maker both in traditional academic settings and in society at large. The focus will be particularly on exchanges and translations of practices of science in society and respective epistemic politics.
Besides, the seminar aims at introducing Open Science as a set of practices to students to let them explore options for their own studies and theses.
I. Introduction to scholarly publishing
II. How to get published? Practical Advices
III. Structuring your article
IV. The reviewing process
V. How not to Publish
VI. Get noticed
Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research. A s...Birute Railiene
Birute Railiene. Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research : a survey of perception and demand
Paper for the 5th International Conference of the European Society of History of Science, Athens, 1-3 November 2012
Presentació a càrrec de Lluís Anglada, director de Ciència Oberta al CSUC, duta a terme a la Training Session on Open Science and Open Access al Centre de Recerca Matemàtica de la UAB l'11 de novembre de 2018
Presentation by CLACSO, academic network of 616 social science research institutions in 47 countries, at OAI10 (CERN-UNIGE, Geneva, 21-23 June 2017), about the world landscape of repositories and regional repositories networks, its achievements and challenges, and the importance of open access being managed as a commons by the scholarly community
Presentation for CLACSO, academic network of 616 social science research institutions in 47 countries, at OAI10 (CERN-UNIGE, Geneva, 21-23 June 2017), about the world landscape of repositories and regional repositories networks, its achievements and challenges, and the importance of open access being managed as a commons by the scholarly community
OSFair2017 Workshop | Next generation repositories – moving from the “fringe”...Open Science Fair
Kathleen Shearer talks about next generation repositories | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
Research data explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshareOpen Knowledge Maps
Presentation at the 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015) in Lugano. Full citation: Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Isabella. (2015). Research Data Explored II : the Anatomy and Reception of figshare. In 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01298
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
The Vienna Principles: A Vision for Scholarly Communication
1. The Vienna Principles: A Vision
for Scholarly Communication
Workshop “Open Science – What‘s in it for me?“
20 September 2017, Austrian Central Library for Physics
Peter Kraker, Know-Center
& Open Knowledge Maps
This content is published under
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
2. Open Access Network Austria (OANA)
Joint activity of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
and Universities Austria (UNIKO)
60 members (universities, research centers,
funding agencies, policy makers, networks)
Output: Proposals, Guidelines & Recommen-
dations for Open Science, e.g.
“Recommendations for the Transition to Open Access
in Austria”: https://zenodo.org/record/34079
4. Scope & Definitions
By scholarly communication we mean the
processes of producing, reviewing, organising,
disseminating and preserving scholarly
knowledge.
1
Scholarly communication does not only
concern researchers, but also society at large,
especially students, educators, policy makers,
public administrators, funders, librarians,
journalists, practitioners, publishers, public and
private organisations, and interested citizens.
1 Based on the definition found in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_communication
5. Working Group Members Year 1 – 2015/16
Daniel Dörler Andreas Ferus Robert Gutounig Florian Heigl
Christian Kaier Katharina Rieck Elena Šimukovič Michela Vignoli
Peter Kraker
(Lead)
Contributors: Edeltraud Aspöck, Sebastian Dennerlein,
Asura Enkhbayar, Gerda McNeill, Nora Schmidt,
Gregor Steinrisser-Allex, Eveline Wandl-Vogt
6. Premise
There are considerable deficits in how scientific
knowledge is produced and disseminated.
Open Science has the potential to change the
workings of the scholarly communication system,
but we see openness as a means to an end.
Openness has to be grounded in a set of widely
shared principles to ensure a coherent vision for
scholarly communication This vision is lacking
7. Work Programme
OpenStreetMap Contributors, CC BY-SA 2.0
Museumsquartier
Academy of Fine
Arts Vienna
University of Natural
Resources and Life
Sciences, Vienna
Austrian Science
Fund (FWF)
Austrian Institute of
Technology (AIT)
Vienna University of
Economics and Business
9. Principles
Scholarly communication should ...
1. Accessibility: … be immediately and openly
accessible by anyone.
2. Discoverability: … facilitate search,
exploration and discovery.
3. Reusability: … enable everyone to
effectively build on top of each other’s
work.
10. Principles
Scholarly communication should ...
4. Reproducibility: … provide reproducible
research results.
5. Transparency: ... provide open and
transparent means for judging the
credibility of a research result.
11. Principles
Scholarly communication should ...
6. Understandability: … provide research in a
clear, concise and understandable way
adjusted to different stakeholders.
7. Collaboration: … foster collaboration and
participation between researchers and
their stakeholders.
12. Principles
Scholarly communication should ...
8. Quality Assurance: … provide transparent
and competent review.
9. Evaluation: … support fair evaluation.
10.Validated Progress: … promote both the
production of new knowledge and the
validation of existing knowledge.
14. Community Feedback
We have created these principles hoping to inspire a
widespread discussion towards a shared vision for
scholarly communication. We welcome feedback,
criticism, and hints to what we may have missed.
We do not see this document as the end of the matter; it
is a first version that will hopefully have many revisions
as we jointly create the scholarly communication system
of the future.
View & Annotate: http://viennaprinciples.org/v1/
16. Working Group Members Year 2 - 2016/17
Edeltraud Aspöck
Rainer Bachleitner
Susanne Blumesberger
Leonhard Dobusch
Daniel Dörler
Asura Enkhbayar
Veronika Gründhammer
Florian Heigl
Anna-Laetitia Hikl
Herwig Jana
Christian Kaier
Jani Kotakoski
Patrick Lehner
Joachim Losehand
Selma Mautner
Gerda McNeill
Benjamin Missbach
Regina Plail
Vanessa Proudman
Katharina Rieck
Georg Schinko
Bernhard Schubert
Dominik Sedivy
Elena Šimukovic
Sabine Trattler
Michela Vignoli
Celine Wawruschka
Lead: Peter Kraker & Katja Mayer
17. Focus Areas Year 2
• Vienna Principles 2.0
– Consolidation of feedback
– Outreach and collaboration
• Putting the Vienna Principles into Action
– “Flipping Buddies“ – Action Group
– Citizen Science
– Repositories
– Skepticism in AHSS