Term Limits Essay

Term Limits Essay
Term Limits There is a movement sweeping the United States that state legislatures, by virtue of the
Tenth Amendment, have the constitutional power to establish a new qualification for federal office,
specifically, a restriction on the number of terms their congressional delegations may serve in
Washington. The legal battleground covers two sections of the Constitution. Proponents of term
limits will highlight Article I, Section 4, which they say gives each state the authority to prescribe
the "time, place and manner" of congressional elections, therefore delegating to the local level the
rules of who gets to run. Opponents will counter that such an interpretation of the Constitution is
much too broad. They will also point out that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Constitution requires a specified period of citizenship, residency in the state represented, and
attainment of a certain age. The Convention also established the length of terms for all elective
offices, but voted against any limits on re–eligibility or the number of consecutive terms that would
be allowed. The absence of term limits in the Constitution was not an oversight, Proposals to limit
elected officers to a specified number of terms were introduced at least three times during the 1787
Convention but were rejected, not because anyone deemed term limits to be a state prerogative, but
because terms limitation would be redundant, For the most part, short terms would encourage more
accountability than limited terms. In his notes on the Convention, James Madison records: "Frequent
elections are necessary to preserve the good behavior of rulers. They also tend to give permanency
to the Government, by preserving that good behavior, because it ensures their re–election." Two–
year terms for the House and other constitutional restraints limited the amount of mischief federal
officers might be inclined to indulge in. Federal powers, being few and defined, were well
understood, and elected officials who exceeded their mandate, or who abused those
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Term Limits Pros And Cons
Term limits separate a democracy from a dictatorship. As society changes, representatives need to
change along with it. America needs term limits on Congressmen because it is necessary for a
healthy democracy. Every six years, a senator is reelected and a representative from the House is
reelected every 2 years. This is important because it allows us to choose who makes the laws. If the
same candidates were brought up every election, people looking for something new in our
legislative branch may not be able to vote for who they want. Even if they could have voted for the
new candidates they wanted , they would most likely not be popular as many people want to vote fo
someone they already know and feel safe with. One may argue that if you

Essay On Congress Term Limits
When utterly stuck in a rut, accustomed to doing the same activities day after day, nothing
productive nor worthwhile gets done. In order to combat this, change needs to happen. The same
applies to members of congress. After years and years of sitting in Washington, congress men and
women accomplish little and get too comfy in their places. In the article "Term Limits Don't Work,"
Stanley M. Caress, a professor of political science, argues that term limits–a limit to the number of
terms that an official may serve–do not cure the ills of Congress. However, congressional term
limits should be enacted and they prove beneficial to the United States of America. Caress first
argues that term limits do not "weaken the grip that special interest lobbyists ha[ve] on lawmaking."
Lobbyists' jobs are to advocate the ideas of the American people; however lobbyists do not always
act as the perfect voice for the people. Instead, lobbyists use money to the influence of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Often new people are elected into congress to shake things up a bit. If a newly elected legislator
does not hold strong opinions nor fight causes that they believe in than the American people who
voted the legislator feel let down. Caress believes that congressmen should hold an "understanding
of the rival party and learn how to find workable compromises." However, he finds that "[n]ovice
legislators...often see the other party as an enemy." Newly elected legislators do not really see the
other party as an enemy, but rather feel that they made promises to the American people and intend
to keep those promises. Because of this, they do not cave into what others bark at them while
Washington and instead, hold true to their beliefs and

Term Limits Of Congress : Congress
Term Limits in Congress
More than seventy–nine congressmen have been in office in both the United States House of
Representatives and the Senate for twenty years or more; Patrick Leahy, Dianne Heinstein, Mitch
McConnell, Mac Thornberry, and many, many more.
James Madison states in Federalist 48 that "The legislative department is everywhere... drawing all
power into its impetuous vortex"(Will). Congress corrupts with power and the only way to stop this
is to impose term limits on the US Congress. Term limits are laws that keep one politician from
being in Congress for too long. Term limits are on the rise with the public, but are hard to get
accepted in Congress. Because of this, the last time a bill that proposed term limits was even voted
on was on May 26, 1993. Many wonder why term limits were not originally put in the Constitution
but term limits were not needed when the Constitution was written because most founding fathers
were not career politicians, now many are career politicians and an amendment to the Constitution is
needed. Term limits should be implemented in the United States Congress because they help prevent
corruption, provide beneficial turnover in Congress, have public support, and, contrary to popular
belief, they can be implemented easily.
As a remedy to the issues in Congress, term limits should be implemented in the US Congress
because they can prevent corruption and provide turnover in Congress. Throughout the years,
working as a Congressman has become

Congress Term Limits
Should members of Congress be subject to term limits? What are the main benefits or disadvantages
to unlimited incumbency? I strongly believe that Congress should have term limits. Currently,
members of the House of Representatives can

serve two–terms. These two terms equal six years. In
a previous post, I discussed how the amendments should not be allowed to be changed with ease and
the two term rule falls under the 22Nd amendment. If this amendment changed, it would allow a
president to serve more than six years and that is way too much. Every president has a different idea
of how they want the country ran and sometimes those ideas are not always the best. With the two
term rule, a new president can come in and try their

Term Limits Should Not Be Beneficial
Debate Paper
Putting limits on the amount of terms a member of Congress can serve is a highly debated issue.
Many people are against term limits. They argue that term limits are unconstitutional and that they
infringe on the rights of the American people to choose who they want to represent their states.
However, many people also argue that term limits would be beneficial. Term limits would be
beneficial because it would put an end to career politicians, give new people a chance to solve the
nation's problems, and limit corruption.
The founding fathers left nothing about term limits for any political office in the Constitution.
George Washington set the precedent for term limits when he retired after two terms in office. Most
presidents after him also stopped running after two terms. Franklin Roosevelt was the only president
with more than two terms. He ran and was elected four times, though he died in the beginning of his
fourth term. After his four terms, the twenty second amendment was passed in 1951. The
amendment says that no one should be elected to office more than twice. In 1995, the idea of term
limits in Congress was brought to the United States Supreme Court. An article in the Arkansas
constitution denied ballot access to any candidate who had already served three terms in the United
States Congress. In a case INC versus Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that it was
unconstitutional for states to impose restrictions on term limits. While states

Term Limits For Congressmen
Term limits should be made for Congressmen because there have been instances where
Senators and Representatives have served 20, 30, 40 and even 50 years in Congress, these
Congressmen seem to become detached from those they represent and hold too much power and
influence in Congress. This undermines the intended purpose of the legislative branch.
Allowing these "career politicians" to remain their whole lives in Congress give them too much
influence and they might have shared the same ideas as the people they represented when they first
go into office, but they definitely might not have the same ideas and beliefs in 30 or
40 years as the newer generations of the people they represent, a lot can change in 30 to 40 years.
This is not a good thing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Supreme Court agreed by a 5–4 vote. The majority and minority had different views of the
federal structure established in the Constitution. Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority
stated that: "Finally, state–imposed restrictions, unlike the congressionally imposed restrictions at
issue in Powell, violate a third idea central to this basic principle: that the right to choose
representatives belongs not to the States, but to the people. ... Following the adoption of the 17th
Amendment in 1913, this ideal was extended to elections for the
Senate. The Congress of the United States, therefore, is not a confederation of nations in which
separate sovereigns are represented by appointed delegates, but is instead a body composed of
representatives of the people."
He ruled that supporting the 73rd Amendment would result in "a patchwork of state qualifications"
for U.S. Representatives, and described that consequence as inconsistent with
"the uniformity and national character that the framers sought to ensure." Justice

Term Limits For Legislators Essay
Term Limits For Legislators
When the Constitution of the United States was adopted in 1789, it was without direction regarding
term limits for legislators. At the time, professional politicians were unheard of, and the idea of
someone serving for more than one or two terms was unlikely. So the Constitution did not formally
address the issue of term limits, although it was understood that officeholders would limit
themselves to one or two terms and then return to private life (1).
With the advent of the modern state, however, came the making of Congress as a career, and thus
the voluntary removal of oneself from office, as envisioned by the founders, is no longer regularly
undertaken in the United States Congress.
The structure of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"To many, it seem[s] that one reason Congress ha[s] lost touch with ordinary people [is]
because so many members [are] in Congress too long." (4) According to Ed Crane of the Cato
Institute, "Americans want to open up the political process. They want their fellow citizens
who live and work in the real world –– the private sector –– to represent them. Not career
legislators... It would allow good people from across the political spectrum to...participate in the
political process as candidates, even if they happen to have spent most of their life outside the
limelight in the private sector like the rest of us." (5)
Clearly voters support term limits for a variety of reasons, yet these reasons all share a common
feature: the desire for a more competitive electoral process, and the hope that term limits will also
limit corruption.
The strength of public support for term limits can be seen in the fact that several states voted to limit
the length of time their representatives can serve in Congress. By the middle of 1995, almost half of
the states had limited the number of terms for their representatives. This success of the term limit
movement at the grass roots level faced a serious setback when the Supreme

Term Limits Analysis
The Supreme Court is a critical part of our government. As such, we need the very best and most
capable judges to serve on the bench of the court. Unfortunately, there have been several cases
where judges have stayed on the court way to long. For example, "Philip Cattan fell asleep during a
rape trial, and was allowed to remain a judge". (Daily Mail, 2016). Therefore, term limits are a good
idea because it would reduce the impact of judges medical issues on the court, changing judges
more often would result in judges who are more in touch with society, and the majority of people in
the United States support the idea of the term limits for the Supreme Court. Having term limits
would be an excellent idea because it would reduce medical issues that would impact the work of
the Supreme Court. This is why many people support the idea of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, John Fund states that "Term limits creates more opportunities for fresh ideas".
(National Review). John Fund is correct, think about it many people want fresher ideas but, we
couldn't have better ideas if were stuck with the same old judges. Also many Americans including
Republicans, Democrats, and independents –support term limits. As a matter of fact, John Fund
states that "A Gallup survey from Jan. 2013 found that 751% of Americans including huge
majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents support term limits on congress". (John
Fund, 2014) Having term limits is just a great idea. Term limits are not only good for the Supreme
Court, but also us. It would be reducing medical issues, allowing younger judges who are in touch
with society take charge, and also it would be taking the peoples vote who support term limits.
Judges who are in touch with society should be allowed to take charge and make better laws. Most
of the United States citizens would be glad of having term

Essay On Congress Term Limits
Consequences of Term Limits on the United States Congress Imposing term limits on the United
States Congress could potentially lead to a massive reduction of knowledgeable politicians in the
American government, thus resulting in a fatal blow to the future of American progression. When
term limits are imposed, it has been shown that legislatures eventually lose valuable leaders, that
have the experience of law making and representing their districts with excellence. The national
legislation also would willingly increase the power held by the Executive Branch, this intern could
compromise the checks and balances system. Imagine if a congressman could only serve a total of
six years. They would strive to voice their constituent's concerns while continuing to draft laws and
reform the government. When it comes to the congressman's final term in office, we will find that a
vast majority of legislatures may turn into a lame duck. Just as the President of the United States
becomes a lame duck in their final years in office, the congressman may be prompted to accomplish
little to no tasks and seek to enjoy their final days in office . Furthermore, legislators without term
limits have proven to be very active in resolving issues for their constituents and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
When you have a strong love for your job and feel as if you can continue to make a positive
difference, why should your potential be limited? For example, if you were to be a CEO of a
prominent company such as Apple and Microsoft, and greatly contributed to the growth of your
company just as Steve Jobs, and Bill Gates have accomplished, then in whose right mind would it be
a sound idea to restrict your potential? Furthermore, Senator Daines has proven to love his job
through his actions in congress, and so have other career

Term Limits Benefits
I think that U.S. Senators and Representatives should have term limits. Since they do not have term
limits they might take the power and use it to their advantage. If we did have term limits then things
would be done wisely and quicker. Term limits would be a good thing for government corruption. If
we had limits that stated how long terms could be served and how many there could be then it would
definitely reduce corruption in the government. Term limits would keep people honest. They would
be kept honest, so that senators and representatives don't have the time to create long lasting
relationships with corrupt businesses and contractors. Term limits would also help to go back to the
original ways of the constitution. When the constitution

Essay on Term Limits: We Don't Need Career Politicians
"Elections, especially of representatives and counselors, should be annual, there not being in the
whole circle of the sciences a maxim more infallible than this, 'where annual elections end, there
slavery begins.' These great men . . . should be [chosen] once a year – Like bubbles on the sea of
matter bourn, they rise, they break, and to the sea return. This will teach them the great political
virtues of humility, patience, and moderation, without which every man in power becomes a
ravenous beast of prey." –John Adams Government exists to serve the people, and not the
politicians, American citizens know this. Polls show that Americans want term limitation by margins
as high as three–to–one, even four–to–one. Congressional term ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many people think that with term limits we would lose experience, maturity, and knowledge of the
workings of Congress. However, this is not correct. The workings of Congress need not be nearly so
complex as careerists would have us think. However, great pains have been exerted to give us that
impression. A term–limited Congress could get the nation's business accomplished in a fraction of
the time that it takes now, with all the posturing, posing, ego trips and headline–grabbing. And a
term–limited Congress could streamline all the procedures. As for experience we would be better off
without some of it. What is needed is experience in the real world life experiences from new blood,
with fresh ideas. With term limits, congressional staff people would gain control, is another widely
used argument against term limits. The fallacy of that argument is that the staff people already have
control. Through the years, Congress has abdicated it to them. Committee staffs write the
legislation, and members' staffs read it, then tell members what's in it. Members themselves rarely
read what they vote on. In a country where ignorance of the law is no excuse, members of Congress
are often ignorant of many of the provisions of laws they vote on. Congress and its members could
regain control from the staffs right now, if they had the will. They don't have the will. A term limited
Congress that had the will could get control of the staffs in a very short period of

Term Limits
Living in the present and looking back at the past, we as citizens see what has worked and what can
be improved; Congress is a good example of this. Some may say that Congress is a failure and some
may be happy and proud of the way it functions and runs our country. For those who do not approve
of it, the idea is to start fresh and get new ideas, people and habits into office. With the way
Congress works today, that may not be the easiest tasks. In order to make changes in Congress, time
is needed; a significant change cannot be made over night and expect it to run smoothly. One of the
ways to bring change and settle the debate of whether or not to 'restart Congress' is to set term limits
on congressional members. There should be term ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pork–barrel spending, special interest of their own state, and how can they make themselves look
good are thing that will be on their mind at some point. Setting term limits would allow Congress to
become more of a "citizen" Congress because more everyday people, not just the wealthy, would be
running for office (balancedpolitics.org). New Politian's would not have time to find loop holes or
exploit the system because they would be focusing on what they need to get done in order to make
their constituents happy. One of the major benefits to term limits is the potential for new ideas
rolling through Congress, and Politian's with a more focused mind set. The founding fathers did
their part of making sure no one person is given too much power by ensuring that the United States
has checks and balances. The 22nd Amendment has contributed to the checks and balances by
limiting presidents to two terms in office. Term limits should also be in place for congressional
members. This may be another way to ensure no congressional member ever has too much power
within the government. Candidates would be running for the purpose to the serve people and not to
just benefit themselves. Term limits would also stop the political reward and power abuse within
Congress, leading to committees being assigned to individuals based on merit and their expertise to
make informed decisions. Doing all

Congressional Term Limits
Congressional terms have no limits. Controversy exists between those who think the terms should
be limited and those who believe that terms should remain unlimited. The group that wants to limit
the terms argues that the change will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions
being made for self–interest. Those who oppose term limits believe that we would sacrifice both the
stability and experience held by veteran politicians. They also point out that our election process
allows the voter to limit terms, at their discretion. While experience and stability are important
considerations, congressional terms should be limited to a maximum of two. Change is difficult and
requires strong support from the voters to start the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, statistics show that currently there is a ninety–four percent re–election rate in the House
and eighty–three percent in the Senate. Because of name recognition and the advantage of money, it
can be easy to stay in office. Representative John Dingell, Jr. of Michigan is an example of a long–
serving politician. He is now eighty–seven years of age and has been serving continuously in the
House of Representatives for more than fifty–seven years. Obviously, Representative Dingell has
the experience. However, age may have impaired some of the effectiveness he exhibited earlier in
his career. More than likely, he would not have the stamina required for the non–stop debates that
we witnessed prior to the recent government shut–down. Representative Dingell certainly has had
no effective campaign competition during his almost fifty–eight years in office. Without legitimate
competition, there are not a lot of incentives for a member of Congress to serve the public.
Furthermore, it is almost impossible for the average citizen to try to campaign against current
members of Congress. 3 Finally, the argument that term limits are unconstitutional is valid as the
Constitution currently reads. However, with the appropriate congressional and voter approval
percentages, the term limits for these representatives could become law.

Congressional Term Limits
No government is perfect and there is no perfect fix. One important step for democratic
governments is to have a political efficacy in their citizens, for a robust and competent government.
Keeping with this idea of efficacy, there has been a movement for political reform requesting to
institute congressional term limits. This essay will address the concept of congressional term limits
through research for and against the idea. The review will start with basic information and history of
term limits, focus on the positive arguments for term limits, address the counter arguments for term
limits, and conclude with an overall analysis of the findings of term limits and if the U.S. should
have term limits. Overview / History Term limits is not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Jeffery Karp, "Public opinion polls show a strong support for term limits, and voters
have implemented such sentiments by passing initiatives appearing on state ballots". Public support
for term limits comes from an idea of change. There is a distrust and dissatisfaction with the
government that the people feel is systemic. The citizens want change and one of the easiest ways is
to change who is in charge. By implementing term limits, the people do not have to worry about a
professional politician staying in office for decades. Another, important justification for term limits
rest with the idea that the political process is faulty. There is a trust divide between the people and
the government. Because of this schism there has been a push for a regime change. An increasing
amount of people do not trust the government to do what is right. By having fixed term limits, the
government would be forced to have new politicians and new ideas that are closer to the voter and in
turn increase trust. One final idea of why the people want term limits is in part to ideology. "The
professionalization of politics, according to some term limits proponents, has contributed to a
burgeoning federal bureaucracy, huge legislative staffs, and undue influence by special interest
groups" (Karp).

Imposing Congressional Term Limits
Imposing Congressional term limits for the members of the congress would be a terrific idea. This is
because if the Congress knows that their position in Congress is limited, they will get things done.
Mark Levin, author of The Liberty Amendment stated that no person may serve more than 12 years
as a member of congress. 12 years is enough for Congress to pass new laws. Now if the propose law
has not been approved by the other members of the Congress by the time their term is over, then the
next person that steps up can continue to pursue the law. No members should stay longer than they
are supposed to. The term limit is necessary because there are other people in power that has been
there for more than a decade. It's true that some of them

Congressional Term Limits Essay
While Donald J. Trump was at a campaign event in Colorado Springs, he said that if he was elected
president he would call for congressional term limits. He began by saying that he has plans to "drain
the swamp" of Washington, DC. As apart of this statement, he promised to push for a constitutional
amendment to impose term limits on congressional lawmakers. "Not only will it end our
government corruption, but we will end the economic stagnation that we are in right now", stated
Trump. What Donald Trump is talking about is directly connected to the United States Congress and
would have huge impact on Congress if gone through with.
This is of considerable significance due to the fact that Congress is a fundamental part of the United
States government. And changing it, would lead to major changes in how our government functions.
Limiting congressional terms might have some unforeseen complications. For example, some states
have placed term limits on their state legislatures, and have found that newly elected legislators tend
to be more partisan and ideological than their more seasoned colleagues. Long–serving lawmakers
often become more understanding of the rival party and learn how to find workable compromises.
While novice legislators, fresh from the campaign trail, often see the other party as an enemy. Which
can greatly inhibit the coalition–building needed to pass budgets and meaningful laws. On the other
hand, some people believe that term limits will ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I agree that term limits may help with the corruption problem, however I also believe that term
limits may create a Congress of little experience. In reality, there is almost no possibility that
congressional term limits will be enacted. Even if Donald Trump proposed these term limits, such a
change would require a two–thirds vote from both chambers or a constitutional convention. And
neither the House nor the Senate would agree to placing term limits on

Presidential Term Limits
Have you ever felt opinionated for or against a president? U.S. presidency has become a very
debatable topic, especially with the recent election in 2016. Did you know that 59% of the U.S.
disapprove of President Donald Trump, while only 37% approve (Jacob Pramuk, 2018)? That is
seventy–one million more people who disagree with Trump compared to the number who do. These
disagreements could be easily dissipated if there were more presidential terms in the limit. Back in
1947, the Twenty–Second Amendment established and enforced a law that someone could not be
president for more than two terms (eight years). If this term limit was extended, it could lead to
many positive impacts, including more strong presidents and less weak presidents; the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is the possible risk of a president becoming a dictator. A president may start abusing their role,
and try to remain president for longer, gaining an overpowering amount of control. This is a large
problem, for if a president becomes a dictator, he or she would take over and control the whole
country. This terminates all democracies set into place and takes away the freedom promised in the
First and Fifteenth Amendment. This mistake has already been made before, with Vladimir Putin,
the current president of Russia. In Russia, a law was placed that there was no term limit, however,
you could not remain in the offices for over two terms consecutively (Wikipedia, 2018). Vladimir
Putin managed to gain enough power to claim four terms consecutively. That is two terms over the
limit! He has gradually become more and more overpowering, becoming more and more of a
dictator rather than a president. We can all agree that we do not want this happening to the U.S. We
want to keep this beautiful country a free democracy. We can prevent this conundrum by addressing
it in two ways: reducing the role of the president and enforcing stricter rules. We could try making
the president not such a large role. For example, Canada's prime minister has a smaller role than the
U.S. president, so we could try making the president's role more like a prime minister's. This will
not give them as much

Term Limits Pros And Cons
Term limits will be instituted on U.S. Supreme Court Justices in order to better reflect the intentions
of the Founder Fathers, to adapt to a changing society, and to end the problem of cognitive
impairment due to age related decline. The Constitution, as written by the Founding Fathers, limits
absolute power and is based on a system of checks and balances. They considered it improper for
any one individual to wield vast power for long periods of time. Life tenure meant serving about ten
years because life expectancy was about 60 years. Thirty year tenures, which exist today, because of
longer life expectancies, were not what the framers had in mind. For example, the first nine Justices
served about nine years in contrast the the most recent nine Justices who have served for about
twenty–seven years. This is over three times as long as the executive branch holds power and
disrupts the balance of our system of government. Term limits will add checks and balances back to
SCOTUS. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As times change, so do interpretations of laws, and new Justices who reflect the evolving society,
are best qualified to represent their values. Life tenure does not allow for flexibility because Justices
are typically fixed in their views. For example, between 1969 and 1993, republican Presidents, in
power for the majority of time, appointed conservative leaning Justices to SCOTUS. Then elected in
1993, the more liberal Clinton won over 60% of the popular vote, but the Judicial branch did not
represent the more liberal views of society. More frequent turnover of Justices allows for thinking
that is better adapted to the present day environment and makes it more

Term Limit Analysis
Term Limits Needed The Supreme Court has been left without a majority vote and is dysfunctional.
The current fiasco that is happening in Washington with the court being weakened by other branches
of the government is an example of the Supreme Court being diminished by political battling.
Therefore, term limits are necessary because they would reduce political fighting, younger judges
are more in touch and terms will allow more diversity on the court. Term limits can affect political
feuding in a positive way minimizing political arguments. Since the Supreme Court job is a lifetime
job so when it comes to appointing a new judge the discussions go over the roof debating on
whether he or she should be a republican or democrat. Term limits will not only stable power
between the political parties but also allow new perspectives. In fact, "in 2015 two–thirds of
Americans supported 10 year ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Having variety in women and men with different ethnic backgrounds will help the view cases in a
better way."It matters that there's diversity on the court. I think it makes for better lawmaking,
because you have people with more diverse range of judgement and who are going to make a better
decision on the law" ( Rachel Maddow 2014). A woman may relate to a case more than a man which
is why diversity is needed. For example, the Roe Vs. Wade trial on abortion that was all decided by
men. It is more likely that if the case had a women involved there would have been better
understanding of the situation. Term limits will have a major impact on the supreme court because
they would decrease political tense, younger judges are more mentally and physically in touch with
current society and terms will allow more diversity on the court. A sharper mentality will allow a
better understanding as well as diversity on the court. Not only will term limits control the power
but will reduce political

Pros And Cons Of Congressional Term Limits
Term limits are a powerful political force and a vital political reform. The movement to limit
political terms and thus political power has been steamrolling through American politics for years.
Many American citizens have approved term limits for Congressmen, moreover many states and
hundreds of cities and counties across the United States have adopted term limits for state and local
officials. Such widespread support of the phenomena shows that the public is not satisfied with the
prevalent careerism and thinks that amendments to the federal legislature would be beneficial for the
Congress and the country as a whole. The below paper will present objective political arguments for
and against the Congressional term limits. Firstly, the arguments for the term limits will be
presented, the arguments against them will proceed, followed by the conclusion drawn by the author
based on the conducted research. There are several arguments that speak for Congressional term
limits. To begin with, term limits were contained in America's first governing document, the Articles
of Confederation. Back then in the eighteenth century this tool was chosen by the founding fathers
to avoid long–term political careerism and the abuse of the power legislators hold. Following this
statement it becomes clear that term limits are needed at all levels of government, however it is
especially vital to apply them to Congress for numerous reasons, some of them being large electoral
advantages exercised by

The Importance Of Term Limits Of Judges
"Recorder Philip Cattan, a respected Manchester barrister who sits as a judge part–time, was seen to
'nod off' as ran under–aged victim answered questions from the defense" (Ollie Mcateer September
21st 2015). The Supreme Court is a very important part to our U.S government. The court decides
the legality of our laws, and how lives are effected by them: therefore we need to have active and
healthier judges that have some experience and know what they are doing. There are many reasons
why term limits should be put into action. In our Supreme Court most judges are aged or in their late
prime, due to the fact that we don't have a limit on how long a person can run as a judge. Judges in
their prime have a higher and faster thinking rate while their young for example, "people are in
much sharper shape mental in their 40s,50s,60s, than 70s,80s,90s" (Christopher Ingraham
Febuary,13,2016). Elderly people can lose their shine they had when they were young once they hit
a certain age. They can also get diagnosed with a sickness such as amnesia which can cause you to
lose your memory fairly easy. Health issues can really tamper with how you preform and results can
end up bad. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If we change term limits to the least of 10 years it would provide fresher ideas and decisions and not
the same decisions constantly. If we change races or ages in our supreme court it would give
different ways that they see things because there can be hypocrite actions chosen upon any race if
the judge felt like he or she wants too. "Newer thoughts from everybody improves how we function
(Winter 1991 Geen

Term Limits In Congress
A common belief across the United states is that congress is not performing as well as they could, or
should, be. One solution that citizens often come to, is implement term limits for Congress. Unlike
many political debates, this one cannot be clearly divided between republican and democratic
viewpoints. Term limits would be a clear message to congress saying, 'this is the amount of time you
have to fix the problems facing this country, and if you cannot do that, we will replace you someone
who can'. Though no longer on the federal political agenda, the desire for congressional term limits
has steadily grown over time for many reasons. Among these lie the desires to push career
politicians out of office, to build trust with the American people, and preventing any sort of greed
that might occur in a longstanding politician. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to a poll in 2011, 71 percent of the public was in support of congressional term limits. In
some regard this can be tied back to technological advancement. Technology has become so
effective; each new generation wants results faster. Congress used to be highly effective at what
their job is detailed to be. Ever since entering the phase of coercive government, congress has been
seen as failing in the public eye. According to a study a mere two years later, 75% of Americans
supported term limits. In reality trust is quite broken between the average citizen and Washington. A
study done in 2008 found that only 24% of the American public trust the government. Many believe
that enacting term limits would fix this

Six-Term Limit Analysis
Sabato discusses that the two term limit has issues that affect the U.S. One issue is that presidents
that plan to run again for a second term tend to focus on "reelection politics", rather than the
focusing on what is important for the U.S. The president will not put effort into what is going on in
the nation, whether it be economically, socially, or politically. If the president does put effort into
current issues in the nation, it could possibly be a rushed action that does not fix what the problem is
as the President would focus more on getting reelected. Additionally, this could cause , "Congress
and the bureaucracy...to 'wait out' a president they do not like" (Sabato, 2007). Conflicts with
Congress and the bureaucracy could arise if the President is not focusing on ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
A six year term limit could drastically decrease issues on both sides as politics could improve and
not focus on unnecessary reelection issues and Congress will not have to press the president or wait
the president out. Not only would it solve current issues, but it could reverse the two term limit that
affected the country and politics. Jonathan Zimmerman, a contributor for The Washington Post,
informs that, "When they succeeded in limiting the presidency to two terms, they limited democracy
itself" (Zimmerman, 2013). Zimmerman explains that the two term limit has affected a principle that
should not be taken away and presidents should be allowed to serve a longer term. The discussion
for ending the term limit set by congress have been brought up multiple times throughout the years
as well and modifying the term limit could be a reasonable solution. Scott Bomboy, an editor for
Constitution Center explains how some members of congress have attempted to abolish the 22nd

Long-Term Limits
When determining how being a politician has changed since the term limits has been enacted. You
have to look at the term limits effects on chair's experience, chairs as gatekeepers, committee
conflict itself, committee chairs as conflict managers, chairs as substantive experts, committee
member experience and expertise, and information gathering by the committees. First, is the chair's
experience, it has dropped dramatically since term limits. "Prior to term limits most chairs were
experienced veterans of the House. Committee chairs in the 1997–1998 Democratically controlled
House had an average of 8.9 years of prior service (approximately 4.5 sessions) and the most
experienced chair had served for 13 previous sessions. In 1995–1996, when ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Which is hard to do, because the chair at best might only have 6 years to serve in office and that's it
and then they are gone. So, the chair in essence has less control, because they have less experience,
which leads them to be less influential. "In fact, in the term–limited House more than one–third of
our respondents indicated that the party leaders or caucus exerted influence over the chair's agenda
compared to less than one–sixth of the pre–term limits respondents. This further supports the
findings that for second–term chairs both institutional changed as well as their lack of experience
contribute to their decline in control over their committees. (Sarbaugh–Thompson, 2004)" However,
control is concentrated at higher levels in House leadership hierarchy. In addition, the party leader
and governor increased after term limits. The party leader itself is going to dangle money towards
legislators to reelection. As for the governor, in the state of Michigan, it has a strong governor to
begin with but after term limits, they become even stronger in their position. Third, the committee
conflict, the sources of conflict increased after term limits. "In Michigan, regions of the state
compete with each other for money, government projects, and other benefits; and budget constraints
can intensify the competition between regions. (Sarbaugh–Thompson, 2004)" Additionally, less
willing to engage in bipartisan negotiations. Even on the committee itself, not having time for trust
and term limits. So, this is not constructive as before term

Amendment : The Term Limit Amendment
AMENDMENT XXVIII (The Term Limit Amendment) Text of Amendment All members of the
House of Representatives and the Senate will be allowed to serve in their positions for a total of
twelve years. Members of the House may serve six two–year terms, and members of the Senate may
serve two six–year terms. This is not limited to consecutive terms, meaning that if a member of the
House serves for say four consecutive terms, and then either decides to take a year off or doesn't get
re–elected, they will still be eligible to serve in the House for two more terms, until the total of
twelve years is reached. This amendment would overrule U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995).
Historical Precedents There is a lot of historical context that go into this amendment being passed.
Socially, this amendment could lead to a number of great changes in the society we live in today. If
members of Congress knew that their time was limited, not just limited by the threat of not being
elected, but limited by a constitutional amendment, they would be more careful in enacting long
term policies that normal citizens become the most affected by. They would have to be more careful
because they would know that there would most definitely be a time in the future where they would
be living under these new policies. The thought of living under their own policies will greatly affect
which laws they vote on or propose themselves. Having limits on terms can also help encourage
everyday citizens to run for

Pros And Cons Of Term Limits
Term Limits? These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning term limits. This is
an important debate for citizens since term limits can rid the government of terrible leaders. The two
positions argue whether or not there should be term limits. Both viewpoints have valid claims
warranting consideration; for example, evidence indicates that term limits prevent the best candidate
from serving in office. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that term limits ensure the eventual
removal of bad leaders. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that there should
be term limits is the stronger position, the position supported by a preponderance of the evidence
cited in the passages. The most convincing and forceful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, term limits, by there very nature, automatically check on the consolidation of power.
In addition, term limits limit horrible heads of state from staying in power for too long.
Consequently, term limits rid a country of consolidated power for the greater good. The second
relevant point to make in support of the claim that term limits are good is that term limits reduce
corruption. To illustrate this, experts think that the longer a politician is in power, the more corupt he
or she becomes. Additionally, term limits ensure that cogressional represetatives cannot turn their
stay in office into a lifetime career. In short, term limits have been shown to reduce corruption, and
therefore, should be kept in place. The final applicable point to make in favor of the position that
politicians should still be subjected to term limits is that term limits keep an influx of fresh ideas. In
support of this point, as leaders are rotated in and out of the political system, new ways of thinking
are sure to arise. As further support of this point, term limits maintain the idea of keeping harmful
beliefs and ideas from taking hold. In brief, term limits are a key part of a health political system in
America, one in which politicians cannot attain too much

Congressional Term Limit Analysis
Our American democratic system is effective by its definition being "to the degree to which
something is successful in producing a desired result." In the Federalist Papers, Hamilton, Jay, and
Madison, outlined the reasoning behind the system of government set up by our Constitution.
Madison states in Federalist 10 that an "extended republic" is the key to "controlling the effects" of
factions. (3). Madison believed, as did many other Founders, that government is created to protect
the diverse interests of the people. This means government should not be controlled by the majority
as every interest counts, even the minority's. This is the system of American democracy, created
through the implementation of a constitutional republic. Through checks ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To bring about much needed change in Congress, we must implement congressional term limits. It
was asked, "do Americans [really] want lawmakers considering matters of long–term political
advancement when addressing critical issues in the present?" (4) One who addresses an issue with
the "thought of obtaining a committee chairmanship six years from now is not conducive to
addressing the problem now" (4). While it may seem beneficial to continue electing congressmen
who have many years of experience, is it really beneficial to the public good when decisions are
based on winning support of a majority of people who are uninformed, irrational, passion–driven,
and bias voters? It is the job of a congressman to be informed and make rational decisions on
problems in order to better our country. If they are focused on re–election, they may make a
decision, while pleasing to his/her constituents, that may do more harm than good to the public or
may not even solve a problem in the slightest. Congressmen worried about re–election are also less
likely to decide on issues that may make a major change in policy, no matter the benefits, as people
generally like the status–quo. With limited terms, representatives would view their time in Congress
about making a difference for the public good now, rather than maintaining political power in the

The Pros And Cons Of Term Limits
Since the founding of the United States of America, the American people have been apprehensive of
a powerful central government. The country's first federal government, under the Articles of
Confederation, succumbed to this notion, allocating the central government very restricted authority.
Under the Articles, the federal government possessed no claim of taxation, no ability to regulate
currency, finite military power, and no system to regulate trade. These restrictions prompted the
founding fathers to establish a new government, which has remained the basis of the country's
political system since its ratification in 1787. Over the next two centuries, however, the nation has
deemed it imperative to amend the constitution. These amendments ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even though the notion of term limits is a pressing matter which has been debated at great length in
America, no legislative action has taken place. Term limits would help clean up Washington in a
multitude of ways. The first of these is eliminating the incumbency advantage for previously elected
officials. Term limits are an important factor when attempting to rectify the unfairness challengers
face when campaigning against an incumbent. Simply put, challengers are limited with resources
while the incumbent holding the office wields many advantages. For example, every house member
receives approximately one million dollars a year for franking, which includes free mail, staff
salaries and office and travel expenses. When the incumbent is running for re–election, not only are
they not focused on policy making, but they are still getting paid while running for office.
Incumbents can receive up to 130,000 dollars a year, compared to their challengers, who in many
circumstances must resign from their current employment while running campaigning. To put it
simply, while the incumbent is making 130,000 dollars a year while running a re–election campaign,
the challenger is earning nothing. (Greenberg 5,

Term Limit Essay
John Dingell, a member of the United States House of Representatives, served fifty–nine years and
twenty–one days at this position. With no term limits set for the federal legislative positions in the
United States, is this representation becoming redundant? Term limits can potentially be crucial in
political reform of the United States that would bring new perspectives to federal legislative
positions, warrant regular federal legislative turnover, and reduce incentives for wasteful election–
related federal spending. Term limits can also pervert the entire understanding of what democracy is,
by substituting the people's will with term limits that may go against what the people want. United
States federal legislative term limits have previously ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This amendment is known as the "Term Limitation Amendment," in addition to limiting terms of
elected officials within the Arkansas state government, the amendment also stated that any person
having served three or more terms as a member of the United States House of Representatives from
Arkansas would no longer be eligible for re–election as a United States Representative from
Arkansas. The amendment also provided that any person who has served two or more terms as a
member of the United States Senate from Arkansas would be ineligible for re–election as a United
States Senator from Arkansas. Arkansas justified their 73rd amendment by citing the tenth
amendment of the United States Constitution. Using the residual clause, Arkansas argued that the
states had the power to limit terms. The Supreme Court, in a five to four decision, ruled against
Arkansas. The court justified their ruling by showing that the Constitution prohibits states from
adopting Congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated. A state congressional term
limits amendment is unconstitutional if it has the likely effect of handicapping a class of candidates
and "has the sole purpose of creating additional qualifications indirectly." Furthermore, "...allowing
individual States to craft their own congressional qualifications would erode the structure designed
by the Framers to form a 'more perfect

Supreme Court Term Limits
In our American government nearly all of our officials titles have limits on them. Regulating the
tenure that a single person is allowed to serve. One of our arguably most important positions in the
American government, the supreme court justice does in fact not have a term limit. Many people
question why they do not have term limits and in fact in the article "Why it's time to get serious
about Supreme Court term limits" they say "Only 17 percent said they supported life tenure. 66
percent of Democrats and 74 percent of Republicans supported the proposal – a strong, and rare,
show of bipartisanship." With their study it shows that majority of people think it's a good idea.
Although there is a reason why they show that precise data.

Term Limits In American Politics
For many years in American politics there are constantly debates on whether or not there should be
term limits imposed on politicians. Term limits have worked their way through Congress into many
cities and counties across America. With much support for term limits from Americans, it shows
how unsatisfied they are with politicians. But there are other ways to get politicians out of office
without term limits. With peoples vote there can be someone new to take the role and do a better job
than the last. Term limits would also decrease experience and would not help anyone gain more
knowledge for their job. In essence, limits are not needed for United States Senators and
Representatives. All Americans eighteen and older have a right to vote. If people do not like their
current U.S. Senator or Representative that is running in an election for another term, they simply do
not have to vote for him or her. When an official is not making the best decisions and/or choices, it
is up to the people to make a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Without term limits both can prosper and become better at their job. With time they can find out
what people want and what they do not want. They find out things that cannot work and things that
will work while they serve. Every term they serve, Senators and Representatives learn more about
not only their job but gain insight on what senior members of Congress do as well. As a member of
the House of Representatives one term is only two years. If there are term limits imposed what kind
of experience can they obtain? Then in fact, what is the point of running for a seat in the House if
you were only guaranteed it for two years? What can they get done in two years? It is a very short
time and nothing would ever get done with Representatives or Senators always changing every one
or two

Term Limits For The Senate Essay
One of the most debated topics in American politics is whether term limits should be implemented
for Federal Congressmen and Senators. Currently, members of the House of Representatives serve
two–year terms and those in the Senate serve six–year terms, but there are an unlimited number of
terms a person can run for in these legislatures (Barbour 217). It's important to analyze the
arguments for and against term limits for Federal Congressmen and Senators in order to grasp a
better understanding of this subject. One argument supporting the implementation of term limits for
Federal Congressmen and Senators is that it allows for new blood in the Federal government. Since
term limits limt how many terms a Federal Congressmen and Senators can serve, term limits would
then cut out career politicians that prioritize their time on reelection then the problems of the
constituents. Term limits allows for a constant flow to introduce new individuals to the Federal
government. If there were individuals that enjoyed a specific Federal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Often times, politicians turn towards their own personal agenda, such as furthering their political
career and enriching themselves, rather than focus on the reasons why their constituents elected
them to be public servants to the people. In the case of Chaka Fattah, a former United States
Democratic Representative for Philadelphia, where the man served in Congress for over 20 years
was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison for "orchestrating a series of frauds to enrich himself and
boost his political career" (Ax). With such a limited amount of time that a Congressmen and
Senators would have in office due to term limits, they would be less likely to fall into corruption and
pursuing their own agenda and refocus on the issues that the people elected them to deal with and

1974 Term Limits
The Term Limits and the 1974 Budget Reform are the two reflections for week five. There has been
a great debate concerning term limits. Term limits are considered to be the key point in rebuilding
the relationship between the government and U. S. citizens. American citizens has lost faith in their
government, because the citizens feel they are not represented, but the officials are focused on
benefiting themselves. However, term limits can remove good leaders out, who may deserve to stay
in office for a longer period of time. "As the authors states that "political bodies do not experience
they need when there are limits on how long they can be in office. It also may keep qualified
individuals from running for office" (Lee, Johnson and

Term Limits For Positions In Congress
The idea of setting term limits for positions in Congress is a hotly debated issue in politics. Both
sides of the issue have very persuasive and valid arguments. Those who argue for term limits claim
that term limits reduces corruption and promotes productivity. Term limits will hinder politicians'
chances to become corrupt. According to occupytheory.org, politicians without term limits have
"more time to develop connections" and "learn how to navigate the system for personal gain." Also,
shorter time in office would limit the amount of benefit a politician will have from being corrupt
which will discourage many from becoming corrupt. Also, term limits will allow for more
productivity. This is because of two reasons. First, according to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first section is a statement giving "all legislative Powers" to the "Congress of the United States"
(US Const. Art. 1 Sec. 1). Also Section 1 makes Congress a bicameral legislature stating that the
Congress "shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." To serve in the House, Clause 2
of Section 2 describes how a prospective member of the House must be twenty five years old, an
American citizen for seven years, and a resident of the state he or she is representing. A term in the
House lasts two years according to the first clause of section 2. According to the Constitution, the
House "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." This means the House has the right to
determine if there is grounds for an impeachment. To serve in the Senate, Section 3 Clause 3
describes how a Senator must be thirty years old, a citizen of the US for nine Years, and a current
inhabitant of the state he or she is representing. A senator has a six year term according to the first
clause of section 3. According to the sixth clause of section 3, the Senate has "the sole Power to try
all Impeachments" (US Const. Art. 1 Sec. 3). This means the Senate has the final say in determining
whether an official should be removed from office or not. However, for the sentence to be carried
out, a two thirds majority must approve. The enumerated powers of the

Congressional Term Limits Essay
The congress is subject to congressional term limits. George Washington. These term limits have
been around since the constitution. The presidential two term limit was informal until 1951 with the
22nd Amendment. The 22nd Amendment states "No person shall be elected to the office of the
President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President,
for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected
to the office of the President more than once." This came after Roosevelt served four terms. Term
limits are needed to control power, give regular citizens a chance to run, and make politicians think
more and do more with their limited office time. Term limits help greatly with controlling power.
There are case ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people who are elected are very well known names, so often reelects. Having term limits
gives people a chance to get their name out there and run for positions. According to the site Our
Generation, "There is a 94% re–election rate in the House and 83% in the Senate. Because of name
recognition, and usually the advantage of money, it can be easy to stay in office. Without legitimate
competition, what is the incentive for a member of Congress to serve the public? Furthermore, it is
almost a lost cause for the average citizen to try to campaign against current members of Congress."
People are not very likely to vote for someone they have never heard of. That's why people start out
in their states, become politicians and work their way up. If it wasn't for term limits, then there
would be not room for them to advance. The term limits make politicians think about and worker
harder toward their objectives. No one is going to get anything done if they have all the time in the
world. Politicians have limited time in each position to prove themselves if they are ever to be
reelected or move up the line of

Term Limit Essay
In this essay, I propose to amend the Constitution by introducing a required term limit for Supreme
Court justices. I am proposing this change because I believe that implementing a term limit will lead
to an increased representation of the people and eliminate possible obstructions to the Supreme
Court's ability to do its job. Under the current Constitution, there are a few problems I want to solve.
The appointment times of new Supreme Court justices are unpredictable and rare, because justices
can serve as long as they are on "good behavior". We never know when we will next see the
appointment of a new justice because we do not know when a current justice will leave the Court.
This unpredictability and rarity leads to two different issues. First, the appointment process becomes
more political. An example of this is when Senate refused to confirm Obama's nominee Merrick
Garland, and instead waited out almost a year for a new president to be elected and a different judge
to be nominated. An elongated vacancy hinders the ability of the Supreme Court to perform its role,
as seen by the fact that the Court only took 3 cases during that year as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This means that the Senate is less likely to raise havoc at every nomination when it is guaranteed
that there will two appointments every presidential term. Vacancies in the Court would always be
filled in a timely matter, because we will always know when appointments will be, and each
president is given a fair chance to impose their justices on the court. Furthermore, justices would
only be in court for 18 years. They would always be in touch with the current population's views and
be able to understand how they might view the Constitution at that time, thus increasing democracy
due to the increased representation of the

Pros And Cons Of Term Limits
I really hate when others take my right to decide when my elected representatives can no longer
represent me. Term limits take that choice away from voters. We already have term limits, it's called
a ballot. The majority of voters either really like the person representing them or are too lazy to
exercise that very powerful means of limiting how long someone represents them. With all the
support many voters give to term limits, it is simply a sign that voters don't want to be bothered with
voting responsibly. This type of voter would rather a law be passed to take over that responsibility.
So, what would happen if a law was created limiting terms and voters really liked a person
representing them? Well, you'd be out of luck. People need to

Members of Congress Should Have Term Limits Essay
When the United States was founded, the theme behind the new government was to establish an
efficient system without doling out too much power to any one person. The Founders intended to
prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had just escaped by breaking away from England. However,
when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through
1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the
legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated
from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to uphold the Founders'
intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Today, career politicians are constantly looking for what will aid them in getting reelected. They
become more loyal to their campaign fund contributers than to the people whom they represent. This
increases the likelihood of having corrupted politicians in office, as they use the government as a
vehicle to further their own career (Kurfirst, 1996, p. 123, 129). George Will, a well–known political
journalist, was quoted as saying "[The] worst feature of professionalism in politics is that it
obliterates the proper distance between the representatives and the represented" (Kurfirst, 1996, p.
125). Even James Madison agreed that legislators were meant to represent the people, not hold
office as a career. In The Federalist No. 57 (1788), he wrote, "From this change of men must
proceed a change of opinions; and from a change of opinions, a change of measures." The lack of
new faces in Congress today symbolizes that the American legislative branch is straying from its
intended purpose. While both houses were intended to have new members regularly with each
election, the House of Representatives was especially supposed to change. James Madison wrote, in
The Federalist No. 57 (1788), "[Representatives] will be taken from that class of citizens which
will...be most likely to aim at an ambitious sacrifice of the many and the aggrandizement of the
few." Whereas Senators were

Term Limits Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Courtney Davis

More from Courtney Davis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Term Limits Essay