ECER 2006
Slides give overview of Teachers`perception/view of their students and students`support system in the schools in Estonia. Teacher and school typology was developed on the basis of complex research, that included 12% of schools in Estonia.
Teachers`perception/view of their students and students`support system in the school. ECER 2006, NW 1.
1. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 1
TALLINN UNIVERSITY
ECER 2006
Teachers`perception/view of their
students and students`support system in
the school
Ene-Silvia Sarv
enesilvia.sarv@mail.ee
6. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 6
Subtheme of project “School as developmentalSubtheme of project “School as developmental
environment and students` coping” - project-environment and students` coping” - project-
leader M Veisson, researchers V-R Ruus, E-Sleader M Veisson, researchers V-R Ruus, E-S
Sarv, L Ots, K Lukk (2003-2007)Sarv, L Ots, K Lukk (2003-2007)
The general research question :
how and to what scope the factors which are
under the control of the school and teachers
influence the wellbeing of students in the
school and support their development.
7. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 7
The theoretical approach is based on
• previous results of research on teacher and school development in
the current situation of societal and curriculum-reforms (Fullan,
Haregreaves 1996, Krull 2002, Ruus 2002, Sarv 2002, 2005)
• the ecological view that person and environment (school culture)
are in dynamic interaction (Bronfenbrenner 1995, Lazarus,
Folkman 1984, Lazarus 1991, Ruus et al 2005)
• the model of school as learning, knowledge creative organisation
(Senge 1990, 2000, Nonaka&Takeuchi 1995, Sarv 2005).
Research methodology includes complex combination of qualitative
and quantitative (survey) methods, including multifactor and
cluster analysis.
8. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 8
For teacher research
we have assumption that
school culture undeniably depends on and
influences the way how teachers perceive and
understand students` and schoolteachers`
attitude towards support of ongoing development
and (academic) coping of students.
How do teachers and schools
differentiate from each other?
9. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 9
The empirical data
questionnaires for
• teachers (623),
• school-leaders (120),
• parents (1823) and
• students (3838)
from 67 compulsory and high schools (12% of
Estonian schools) in 2004.
10. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 10
Model of teacher perception:
seven aggregated categories and 23 indicators
1. view of student in school, perception of students as
humans (St on radardiagram)
2. students participation and significance at school (St
on diagram)
3. reasons of students` stress
4. teachers level of awareness of students` problems
5. teacher`s support for students` development
6. dimension of futures in teachers` work
7. self-confidence and cooperation of teachers`
collective/community and school
11. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 11
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith
students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message
for parents
1.Group 2. Group 3. Group 4. Group
The main diagram of teachers`clusters (Zscore)
12. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 12
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for
parents
1 Group 4 Group 3 Group 2 Group
Stress-sensitive middle/mean – 297 teachers (48%) - norm(ative) group
13. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 13
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for
parents
1 Group 2 Group 4 Group 3 Group
Stress-sensitive pessimistic group – 105 teachers (18%)
14. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 14
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for
parents
4 Group 3 Group 2 Group 1 Group
Promising? risk-group - 27 teachers (4%)
15. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 15
Some control data.
In our school we are able to help even students with
great problems (%)
Teacher
Do not agree 7,4 More or less
agree
50,2
Rather do not
agree
27,3 Agree 15,2
School
leader
Do not agree 1,7 More or less
agree
61,9
Rather do not
agree
18,6 Agree 17,8
16. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 16
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for
parents
1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group
Optimistic and active teacher with positive
child/student-view - 191 teachers (30%)
17. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 17
In the school we have teams to study students
learning and to find ways to improve it
teacher no 55,7 %
Yes 44,3 %
18. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 18
Teacher groups
Stress-sensitive middle/mean group – 297
teachers (48%) - The norm(ative) group
Stress-sensitive pessimistic group – 105
teachers (18%)
Promising? risk-group - 27 teachers (4%)
Optimistic and active group with positive
child/student-view - 191 teachers (30%)
19. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 19
-0,40
-0,30
-0,20
-0,10
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodwill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch awareness of economical problemsTeachers` awareness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations with students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for parents
31-40 y. 41-50 y. 51-60 y. over 60 y. up to 30 years
Other groupings - age
20. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 20
-0,5
-0,4
-0,3
-0,2
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith
students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message
for parents
master on methods senior-teacher teacher first-year teacher
Other groupings – pedagogical rank (novice –
teacher - senior-teacher – master on methods)
21. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 21
-0,5
-0,4
-0,3
-0,2
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith
students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message
for parents
teacher senior-teacher first-year teacher master on methods
Other groupings – pedagogical rank (novice –
teacher - senior-teacher – master on methods)
22. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 22
-0,4
-0,3
-0,2
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith
students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message
for parents
Female Male
Other groupings - gender
23. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 23
-1,0
-0,8
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal problems
St stress-factor - physical environment
Tch aw areness of economical problemsTeachers` aw areness of students` fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive message for
parents
Estonian and Russian Estonian Russian
Other groupings – language (Estonian, Russian)
24. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 24
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
Students` pleasure at school
St fears of exams
St beliefs in assessment
St happiness, fortitude
St goodw ill
St-tch partnership in planning
St selfgovernment - role in school
Students` stress-factor - teacher
St stress-factor - grades, marks
St stress-factor - health, personal
problemsSt stress-factor - physical
environment
Tch aw areness of economical
problems
Teachers` aw areness of students`
fears
Teacher as educator
Tch pedagogical conversations w ith
students
Tch - conditions for st development
Tch - direction of st development
Sch - support versus punishment
Sch - tch consideration of futures
Sch - use of information and rooms
School`s belief in high quality of
teaching
School`s self-confidence
Joint problemsolving and positive
message for parents
2. Group 3. Group 1.Group 4. Group
Schools – clusters by teachers perception of students and
students` support-system (1 cluster - 25 schools, 2 – 7, 3 – 16, 4 – 5)
25. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 25
Result :
Typology(s) of teachers
Typology(s) of schools
Preliminary tool(s) to describe school
Map of teachers` views (mental models) according to
age, qualification, working language, school
localisation etc
For politicians, ministry, schools, universities:
Suggestions about cahnge strategy, teacher pre-
service and in-service education (diferensiation,
individulisation)
26. Ene-Silvia Sarv, 2006 26
There is no a teacher, a school – there are clearly
identfied groups of different knowledge and
attitudes.
Today`s technology allows to make so wide and
elaborated analyses, that strategies can be
worked out and adapted according to groups and
even individuals.
Changes can be and have to be developed out of
these realities and has to be adapted, introdused
according to concrete type of school, teacher.