SystemVerilog Assertions verification with SVAUnit - DVCon US 2016 TutorialAmiq Consulting
SVAUnit is an UVM compliant package that addresses verification of SystemVerilog Assertions (SVAs) with several advantages:
- decouple assertion validation code from assertion definition code
- simplify the generation of a wide range of stimuli, from 1 bit signal toggling to transactions
- provide the ability to reuse scenarios
- provide self-checking mechanisms
- report test status automatically
- integrate with major simulators
This tutorial discusses SVA planning, coding guidelines, SVAUnit (SVAUnit framework, self-checking tests, debug), and test patterns. Planning includes parametrization, temporal sequence composition, sequence reuse and also consider how the SVA package will be integrated with other verification methods. Coding guidelines ensure efficiency as well as avoid common implementation pitfalls.
UVM is a standardized methodology for verifying complex IP and SOC in the semiconductor industry. UVM is an Accellera standard and developed with support from multiple vendors Aldec, Cadence, Mentor, and Synopsys. UVM 1.0 was released on 28 Feb 2011 which is widely accepted by verification Engineer across the world. UVM has evolved and undergone a series of minor releases, which introduced new features.
UVM provides the standard structure for creating test-bench and UVCs. The following features are provided by UVM
• Separation of tests from test bench
• Transaction-level communication (TLM)
• Sequences
• Factory and configuration
• Message reporting
• End-of-test mechanism
• Register layer
SystemVerilog Assertions verification with SVAUnit - DVCon US 2016 TutorialAmiq Consulting
SVAUnit is an UVM compliant package that addresses verification of SystemVerilog Assertions (SVAs) with several advantages:
- decouple assertion validation code from assertion definition code
- simplify the generation of a wide range of stimuli, from 1 bit signal toggling to transactions
- provide the ability to reuse scenarios
- provide self-checking mechanisms
- report test status automatically
- integrate with major simulators
This tutorial discusses SVA planning, coding guidelines, SVAUnit (SVAUnit framework, self-checking tests, debug), and test patterns. Planning includes parametrization, temporal sequence composition, sequence reuse and also consider how the SVA package will be integrated with other verification methods. Coding guidelines ensure efficiency as well as avoid common implementation pitfalls.
UVM is a standardized methodology for verifying complex IP and SOC in the semiconductor industry. UVM is an Accellera standard and developed with support from multiple vendors Aldec, Cadence, Mentor, and Synopsys. UVM 1.0 was released on 28 Feb 2011 which is widely accepted by verification Engineer across the world. UVM has evolved and undergone a series of minor releases, which introduced new features.
UVM provides the standard structure for creating test-bench and UVCs. The following features are provided by UVM
• Separation of tests from test bench
• Transaction-level communication (TLM)
• Sequences
• Factory and configuration
• Message reporting
• End-of-test mechanism
• Register layer
SystemVerilog based OVM and UVM Verification MethodologiesRamdas Mozhikunnath
Introduction to System Verilog based verification methodologies - OVM and UVM concepts
For more online courses and resources follow http://verificationexcellence.in/
How to create SystemVerilog verification environment?Sameh El-Ashry
Basic knowledge for the verification engineer to learn the art of creating SystemVerilog verification environment.
Starting from the specifications extraction till coverage closure.
The System Verilog UVM promises to improve verification productivity while enabling teams to share tests and test benches between projects and divisions. This promise can be achieved; the UVM is a powerful methodology for using constrained randomization to reach higher functional coverage goals and to explore combinations of tests without having to write each one individually. Unfortunately the UVM promise can be hard to reach without training, practice and some significant expertise. Verification is one of the most important activities in the flow of ASIC/VLSI design. Verification consumes large amount of design flow cycle & efforts to ensure design is bug free. Hence it becomes intense requirement for powerful and reusable methodology for verification.
Introduction to SOC Verification Fundamentals and System Verilog language coding. Explains concepts on Functional Verification methodologies used in industry like OVM, UVM
AMBA AHB is a bus interface suitable for high-performance synthesizable designs. It defines the interface between components, such as masters, interconnects, and slaves.
AXI is an on-chip, point to point communication protocol. It is used as a high-performance bus in various IP or SoC Systems. It is used for connecting high-performance processors with memory.
SystemVerilog based OVM and UVM Verification MethodologiesRamdas Mozhikunnath
Introduction to System Verilog based verification methodologies - OVM and UVM concepts
For more online courses and resources follow http://verificationexcellence.in/
How to create SystemVerilog verification environment?Sameh El-Ashry
Basic knowledge for the verification engineer to learn the art of creating SystemVerilog verification environment.
Starting from the specifications extraction till coverage closure.
The System Verilog UVM promises to improve verification productivity while enabling teams to share tests and test benches between projects and divisions. This promise can be achieved; the UVM is a powerful methodology for using constrained randomization to reach higher functional coverage goals and to explore combinations of tests without having to write each one individually. Unfortunately the UVM promise can be hard to reach without training, practice and some significant expertise. Verification is one of the most important activities in the flow of ASIC/VLSI design. Verification consumes large amount of design flow cycle & efforts to ensure design is bug free. Hence it becomes intense requirement for powerful and reusable methodology for verification.
Introduction to SOC Verification Fundamentals and System Verilog language coding. Explains concepts on Functional Verification methodologies used in industry like OVM, UVM
AMBA AHB is a bus interface suitable for high-performance synthesizable designs. It defines the interface between components, such as masters, interconnects, and slaves.
AXI is an on-chip, point to point communication protocol. It is used as a high-performance bus in various IP or SoC Systems. It is used for connecting high-performance processors with memory.
Advanced patterns in asynchronous programmingMichael Arenzon
Using Futures as a basic building block for concurrent, async code has become pervasive in the past few years and for a good reason. However, when moving from the traditional synchronous code to the async one, a set of patterns that were obvious to implement before now seem to be more challenging. The aim of this talk is to show few examples of these patterns implemented with Scala futures in an async and non blocking manner. We will present the usage pattern and the implementation in order to show the principles of properly handling async code.
During this talk we'll cover the theory and practical implementation behind most common patterns in modern multi-threaded programming. How our everyday libraries and frameworks optimize use of operating system resources for maximum efficiency. We'll also try to understand differences between various approaches and what tradeoffs do they infer. Finally we'll take a look at how they are supported by various compilers and runtimes.
Can AI do good? at 'offtheCanvas' India HCI preludeAlan Dix
Invited talk at 'offtheCanvas' IndiaHCI prelude, 29th June 2024.
https://www.alandix.com/academic/talks/offtheCanvas-IndiaHCI2024/
The world is being changed fundamentally by AI and we are constantly faced with newspaper headlines about its harmful effects. However, there is also the potential to both ameliorate theses harms and use the new abilities of AI to transform society for the good. Can you make the difference?
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting ServicesResDraft
Whether you’re looking to create a guest house, a rental unit, or a private retreat, our experienced team will design a space that complements your existing home and maximizes your investment. We provide personalized, comprehensive expert accessory dwelling unit (ADU)drafting solutions tailored to your needs, ensuring a seamless process from concept to completion.
Dive into the innovative world of smart garages with our insightful presentation, "Exploring the Future of Smart Garages." This comprehensive guide covers the latest advancements in garage technology, including automated systems, smart security features, energy efficiency solutions, and seamless integration with smart home ecosystems. Learn how these technologies are transforming traditional garages into high-tech, efficient spaces that enhance convenience, safety, and sustainability.
Ideal for homeowners, tech enthusiasts, and industry professionals, this presentation provides valuable insights into the trends, benefits, and future developments in smart garage technology. Stay ahead of the curve with our expert analysis and practical tips on implementing smart garage solutions.
Between Filth and Fortune- Urban Cattle Foraging Realities by Devi S Nair, An...Mansi Shah
This study examines cattle rearing in urban and rural settings, focusing on milk production and consumption. By exploring a case in Ahmedabad, it highlights the challenges and processes in dairy farming across different environments, emphasising the need for sustainable practices and the essential role of milk in daily consumption.
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitabilityaaryangarg12
In today's digital era, the dynamics of brand perception, consumer behavior, and profitability have been profoundly reshaped by the synergy of branding, social media, and website design. This research paper investigates the transformative power of these elements in influencing how individuals perceive brands and products and how this transformation can be harnessed to drive sales and profitability for businesses.
Through an exploration of brand psychology and consumer behavior, this study sheds light on the intricate ways in which effective branding strategies, strategic social media engagement, and user-centric website design contribute to altering consumers' perceptions. We delve into the principles that underlie successful brand transformations, examining how visual identity, messaging, and storytelling can captivate and resonate with target audiences.
Methodologically, this research employs a comprehensive approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. Real-world case studies illustrate the impact of branding, social media campaigns, and website redesigns on consumer perception, sales figures, and profitability. We assess the various metrics, including brand awareness, customer engagement, conversion rates, and revenue growth, to measure the effectiveness of these strategies.
The results underscore the pivotal role of cohesive branding, social media influence, and website usability in shaping positive brand perceptions, influencing consumer decisions, and ultimately bolstering sales and profitability. This paper provides actionable insights and strategic recommendations for businesses seeking to leverage branding, social media, and website design as potent tools to enhance their market position and financial success.
Unleash Your Inner Demon with the "Let's Summon Demons" T-Shirt. Calling all fans of dark humor and edgy fashion! The "Let's Summon Demons" t-shirt is a unique way to express yourself and turn heads.
https://dribbble.com/shots/24253051-Let-s-Summon-Demons-Shirt
2. SystemVerilog Assertion?
SystemVerilog アサーション?
SVA Checker Library
SVA チェック・ライブラリ
Custom Assertion
カスタム・アサーション
Advanced SVA
アドバンスト SVA
Appendix
3. A language to describe sequence of
events
Let you test for their occurrence by adding
verification code to design
A part of SystemVerilog language
5. Behaviors suited to assertions
Interface protocols
Temporal relationships
FSM operation
Signal/command level
Behaviors better suited to Hardware
Verification language
Complex mathematical formula
Complex data transaction
6. General library of common property
checks
Two forms
Module based and Interface based
Directory (ディレクトリ)
$VCS_HOME/packages/sva/
Document (ドキュメント)
$VCS_HOME/doc/UserGuide
7. Many basic properties
can be checked using
SVA Checker Library
Fast and easy
Pre-written/ Pre-verified
Verilog
source
SVA
source
vcs
simv
DVE
sim
8. $> vcs
-sverilog // Active SV(A) compilation
+define+ASSERT_ON // Enable the checking functionality
-y $VCS_HOME/packages/sva // Directory of Checker library
+libext+.sv //
+incdir+$VCS_HOME/packages/sva // Include directory
-debug_all // Turn on debug and line stepping
-assert dve // Dump SVA data for DVE debug
<verilog source code>
$> ./simv -gui
9. DVE
Debug GUI
-assert report and –assert success
Quick debugging through textual report
$assert_monitor
Trace debugging in textual format
13. Used to capture certain functionality
Used to describe a pattern that we want to
check for
Two important aspects
Whether the simulation results match the
expression
The start and end time of the evaluation
sequence <name>(<arguments>)
<clock> <expression>;
endsequence
14. Specifying Delays
Fixed time
##1
##0: Special case used to joint two sequences
Time interval
##[1:3]
Open ended, eventually
##[1:$]: Next clock cycles to the end of simulation
The delay is in clock cycles, not nanoseconds
15. How to use?
req ##2 ack
ack should be high two cycles after req
req ##2 ack ##3 !ack
ack will remain high for only 3 cycles
req ##2 ack ##3 !ack ##[1:3] $fell(done)
done falls 1 to 3 clocks after ack is removed
16. Defines the behavior of the design
Can be declared in a module or in an
interface
Can optionally have formal arguments
Built from sequences or Boolean expressions
property <name>;
<clock> <expression>;
// <clock><sequence name>;
// <sequence name>;
endproperty
17. Sequences are often used to construct
properties
Breaks down complex functionality
Promotes re-use
Using sequence Without sequence
sequence s1;
req && !ack;
endsequence
property p1;
@(posedge clk) s1;
Endproperty
property p1;
@(posedge clk) req && !ack;
endproperty
18. Produces results that are visible
externally: reports, waveforms, …
An assert either passes, fails or remains
incomplete
<label> assert property <property_name>;
Assertions used as check Assertions used as forbid
property p1_check;
@(posedge clk) b ##1 c;
endproperty
a1: assert property (p1_check);
property p1_check;
@(posedge clk) not (b ##1 c);
endproperty
a1: assert property (p1_check);
19. Assert statements can also have action block associated with
it.
When no action block is specified its treated as null
Action block cannot contain another assert statement
property p1_check;
@(posedge clk) b |-> ##1 c;
endproperty
a1: assert property (p1_check) else begin
$display(“the p1_check failed”);
notifier = 1;
$my_c_function; //Task call
end
20. An assert statement can be embedded
within procedural always blocks
Clock and enabling signals are automatically
inherited
Immediate Assertion
Evaluated when the assert statement is
executed in the procedural code.
Good for combinational checks (non temporal)
Only Boolean expressions are allowed
No sequences or properties
23. Signal Edge sampling (信号エッジサンプリング)
$rose(<signal_name>)
Returns true if a positive edge was detected between the last
and current samples.
$fell(<signal_name>)
Returns true if a negative edge was detected between the
last and current samples.
24. Property adds constructs for evaluation
control
not: inverts the expression
Good for forbid a property
Implication: |->, |=>
disable iff (if and only if)
25. Implication is equivalent to if-then structure
Overlapped implication: |->
If antecedent evaluates to true, the consequent is
evaluated on same clock cycle
Assertion does not fail if antecedent is false
Vacuous Success
Non-overlapped implication: |=>
If there is a match on the antecedent, the consequent is
evaluated one clock cycle later
The statement: a |=> b is equivalent to: a |-> ##1 b
Useful to synchronize data between multiple clocks
26. Implication has a default else clause
The statement: req |-> ack is equivalent to: if
req then ack else 1
The following are NOT the same:
req && ack
Fails when req = 0
req |-> ack
Succeeds when req = 0
28. Use disable iff to abort property valuation
on a Boolean condition (e.g., reset)
If reset is TRUE, terminates the attempt with a
vacuous success
29. $stable(expr)
Returns true if the value of an expression did not
change between the last and current samples.
$past(expr, n)
Returns the value of an expr n samples earlier.
$isunknown(expr)
Returns true if any bit of the expression is X or Z.
$countones(expr)
Returns an integer equal to the number of 1’s in the
expression.
30. Bindings are used to attach SVAs to the
design
Allows SVAs to be written in a separate module
Module bindings
The module/interface containing the properties become
part of that module and all its instances
bind <module_name> <SVA_module_name> #(parameter_list)
<instance_name> (port_list);
Instance bindings
The module/interface containing the properties become
part of the specific instance
bind <instance_name> <SVA_module_name> #(parameter_list)
<instance_name> (port_list);
31. Bindings are easy way to use checker libraries
Verification engineers developing complex properties to verify
interfaces should write properties in a separate module/interface and
bind it to the design
module check_par(clk, parity, data);
input clk, parity; input [31:0] data;
property p_check_par;
@(posedge clk) ^(data^parity) == 1’b0;
endproperty
a_check_par: assert property(p_check_par);
endmodule
bind data_bus check_par a1(m_clk, m_parity, m_data);
bind top.mid.u1 check_par a2 (i_clk, i_parity, i_data);
32. Option Description
-assert enable_diag Control assertions at runtime
-assert dve Enable dumping assertion information in a VPD file
-assert disable Disable all SVAs in the design
-assert disable_cover Disable assertion coverage
-assert dumpoff Disable the dumping of SVA information
-assert finish_maxfail=N
-assert global_finish_maxfail=N
Terminate simulation after certain number of assertion
failures
-assert success Show both passing and failing assertions
-assert maxsuccesses=N Limit the maximum number of successes reported
-assert quiet Disable the display of messages when assertions fail
-assert report=file_name Generate a report file
-cm assert Specifies monitoring for SystemVerilog assertions coverage
33. Sequence repetition operators
Consecutive repetition [*n]
Range repetition [*min:max]/ [*min:$]
Go to repetition [->n]
Non-consecutive repetition [=n]
Implication and repetition
Repetition as an antecedent
Repetition as an consequence
34. A[*1]: A ##1 A
A[*n]: A ##1 A ##1 A ##1 A …. ##1 A
A[*1:$]: A[*1], A[*2], A[*3], …
A[*min:max]
A[->1] (!A[*0:$] ##1 A)
A[->n] (!A[*0:$] ##1 A)[*n] A[->1][*n]
A[->1:3] A[->1] or A[->2] or A[->3]
A[->min:max] A[->min] or A[->(min+1)] or… A[->(max-
1)] or A[->max]
A[=1] (A[->1] ##1 !A[*0:$])
A[=n] (A[->n] ##1 !A[*0:$])
35. Use the repetition operator to loop on a
sequence or Boolean expression
sequence [*n] // n = integer number of
iterations
There is an implicit ##1 between each loop
“ready asserted for 3 consecutive cycles”
ready ##1 ready ##1 ready
property p_ready_3;
@(posedge clk) ready[*3];
endproperty
36. Same as consecutive but with an upper bound
sequence [*min:max]
Generates (max – min) + 1 threads
There is an implicit ##1 between each loop
“ ready repeated 1 to 3 times”
ready or ready ##1 ready or #ready ##1 ready ##1 ready
property p_ready_13;
@(posedge clk) ready[*1:3];
endproperty
A[*1:$]: A[*1], A[*2], A[*3], …
Upper bound $: the sequence repeats at least the number
of times specified by the lower bound.
37. Non-consecutive exact repetition' operator for
Boolean expression
It checks if a Boolean expression has been true
for specified number of times but not necessarily
on consecutive clock cycles.
The sequence starts with the first occurrence of
the Boolean expression and ends with the last
A[->1] (!A[*0:$] ##1 A)
A[->n] (!A[*0:$] ##1 A)[*n] A[->1][*n]
A[->1:3] A[->1] or A[->2] or A[->3]
A[->min:max] A[->min] or A[->(min+1)] or… A[->(max-1)] or
A[->max]
38. Similar to the [-> ] operator
When the ends with the last true value of
the operand, [= ] operation may extend
beyond such last true value.
A[=1] (A[->1] ##1 !A[*0:$])
A[=n] (A[->n] ##1 !A[*0:$])
39. Repetition can be used on either side of the
implication operators “|->” and “|=>”
When repetition is used with implication:
In antecedent:
Vacuous successes for unmatched threads
Matched threads result in continued evaluation of
consequent
In consequent:
Only one of thread needs to match