1. The document examines the impacts of land use policies in China and Laos that have led to the replacement of swidden agriculture with rubber plantations. 2. While policies in both countries aimed to increase rubber production, their impacts on smallholders diverged greatly due to differences in government support. 3. REDD+ policies that only incentivize increased tree cover risk negatively impacting livelihoods, as seen in Laos where smallholders lost land access without support. Designing effective REDD+ requires considering carbon stocks, livelihoods, and other environmental services.