![This presentation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Student support-seminar
Similar to Student support-seminar (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Student support-seminar
- 1. Student Support Review Implementation & Pilot Phase (Phase 3) Rachel Burn, Student Support Review Programme Manager Strategy Unit May 2009
- 15. Student headcount, 1970/71 – 2005/06
- 16. Student progression, 1970/71 – 2005/06
Editor's Notes
- Introduce Thank you Quiz Any questions so far? Presentation – please interrupt if you want to.
- It is as well to remind ourselves why we as an institution have felt it appropriate to consider the fundamentals of the way we do student support. There were many drivers. I shall concentrate on students, what they do and how they are changing 2 graphs we looked at first this morning one reason why we are doing this. Overall retention and progression rates plus retention and progression rates of certain types of students such as BME Increased competition Since the Review started increased reason for doing it – ELQ, Financial crisis – forcing us to look closely at how we support students and how we could do it better.
- enhance the student experience – it has to be better and more retention and progression otherwise why bother changing. be flexible in responding to changes in student needs and the University’s environment; - so can for example change to support new areas of curriculum provide a cost-effective model – goes without saying in the current financial climate, has to be cost neutral, designing gold standard easy, it’s designing the differentiated, targeted, perhaps sometimes bronze standard that is tricky. to define the roles and competencies required to deliver appropriate, flexible and diverse learning support in future; and the costs associated with this ie in T&D of staff to recommend a transition plan from existing to new learning support roles and structures. – and the associated costs if appropriate and if the evidence suggest we should change
- 1-4 = Student Profiles – Information Office? 5-8 = More resource at Level 1 and developing autonomous learners at Levels 2 & 3 – Learning and Teaching Office? 9-13 = Award-based services project – Curriculum & Awards Office 14-17 = Piloting student support teams – All but Quality Office and Futures Office ? Also there is a postgraduate team so Research Office may be interested in this.
- This is the upside of the University’s history. Student numbers have grown steadily, with few checks on that growth
- This is the downside. This shows the percentage of students who register for a course in their second year since 1970/71. It is a tale of steady decline. Under 4 in 10 new students now comes back for a course in their second year. And no, they are not increasingly taking breaks at the end of the first year. The decline in re-registration two and three years on shows the same trend.