Stiffness method of structural analysisKaran Patel
This method is a powerful tool for analyzing indeterminate structures. One of its advantages over the flexibility method is that it is conducive to computer programming.
Stiffness method the unknowns are the joint displacements in the structure, which are automatically specified.
Stiffness method of structural analysisKaran Patel
This method is a powerful tool for analyzing indeterminate structures. One of its advantages over the flexibility method is that it is conducive to computer programming.
Stiffness method the unknowns are the joint displacements in the structure, which are automatically specified.
Workability of concrete is defined as the ease and homogeneity with which a freshly mixed concrete or mortar can be mixed, placed, compacted and finished. Strictly, it is the amount of useful internal work necessary to produce 100% compaction.
good for engineering students
to get deep knowledge about design of singly reinforced beam by working stress method.
see and learn about rcc structure....................................................
Workability of concrete is defined as the ease and homogeneity with which a freshly mixed concrete or mortar can be mixed, placed, compacted and finished. Strictly, it is the amount of useful internal work necessary to produce 100% compaction.
good for engineering students
to get deep knowledge about design of singly reinforced beam by working stress method.
see and learn about rcc structure....................................................
Analysis of Stress and Deflection of Cantilever Beam and its Validation Using...IJERA Editor
This study investigates the deflection and stress distribution in a long, slender cantilever beam of uniform
rectangular cross section made of linear elastic material properties that are homogeneous and isotropic. The
deflection of a cantilever beam is essentially a three dimensional problem. An elastic stretching in one direction
is accompanied by a compression in perpendicular directions. The beam is modeled under the action of three
different loading conditions: vertical concentrated
load applied at the free end, uniformly distributed load and uniformly varying load which runs over the whole
span. The weight of the beam is assumed to be negligible. It is also assumed that the beam is inextensible and so
the strains are also negligible. Considering this assumptions at first using the Bernoulli-Euler’s bendingmoment
curvature relationship, the approximate solutions of the cantilever beam was obtained from the general
set of equations. Then assuming a particular set of dimensions, the deflection and stress values of the beam are
calculated analytically. Finite element analysis of the beam was done considering various types of elements
under different loading conditions in ANSYS 14.5. The various numerical results were generated at different
nodal points by taking the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system at the fixed end of the beam. The nodal
solutions were analyzed and compared. On comparing the computational and analytical solutions it was found
that for stresses the 8 node brick element gives the most consistent results and the variation with the analytical
results is minimum.
Analysis of Stress and Deflection of Cantilever Beam and its Validation Using...IJERA Editor
This study investigates the deflection and stress distribution in a long, slender cantilever beam of uniform
rectangular cross section made of linear elastic material properties that are homogeneous and isotropic. The
deflection of a cantilever beam is essentially a three dimensional problem. An elastic stretching in one direction
is accompanied by a compression in perpendicular directions. The beam is modeled under the action of three
different loading conditions: vertical concentrated
load applied at the free end, uniformly distributed load and uniformly varying load which runs over the whole
span. The weight of the beam is assumed to be negligible. It is also assumed that the beam is inextensible and so
the strains are also negligible. Considering this assumptions at first using the Bernoulli-Euler’s bendingmoment
curvature relationship, the approximate solutions of the cantilever beam was obtained from the general
set of equations. Then assuming a particular set of dimensions, the deflection and stress values of the beam are
calculated analytically. Finite element analysis of the beam was done considering various types of elements
under different loading conditions in ANSYS 14.5. The various numerical results were generated at different
nodal points by taking the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system at the fixed end of the beam. The nodal
solutions were analyzed and compared. On comparing the computational and analytical solutions it was found
that for stresses the 8 node brick element gives the most consistent results and the variation with the analytical
results is minimum.
A tensegrity structure is a combination of compression members and tension cables. I have already discussed the advantages and disadvantages of this structure based on some reputed journals.
DEFLECTION AND STRESS ANALYSIS OF A BEAM ON DIFFERENT ELEMENTS USING ANSYS APDL IAEME Publication
This paper studies the maximum deflection and Von-Misses stress analysis of:- a) Simply Supported Beam and b) Cantilever Beam under two different types of loading. The theoretical calculations are done based on the general Euler-Bernoulli’s Beam Equation. The Computational Analysis is done on ANSYS 14.0 software. Comparing the Numerical Results with that of the ANSYS 14.0, excellent accuracy of the present method has been extracted and demonstrated. In
ANSYS 14.0 accuracies of different elements are measured and it has been visualized and concluded that Beam 189 element is most suitable element for Beam Analysis as compared to the Beam 188 element and other Solid elements.
Aeolian vibrations of overhead transmission line bundled conductors during in...Power System Operation
In part A of this paper, the frequency mobility response
of the excitation technique used to induce vibration on
a quad-bundled conductor rigidly attached indoors was
investigated. Two reference inputs were used to link
the shaker to the quad bundle conductors via a square
rigid block made of welded square hollow steel. The
primary objective was to determine whether there
was interference due to the use of a rigid connection.
In the first instance, restraining the free motion of the
bundle conductors which would be disadvantageous
to the vibration response results. The interference
was evaluated in the form of mobility FRF responses
This unit covers Types of stresses & strains,
Hooke’s law, stress-strain diagram,
Working stress,
Factor of safety,
Lateral strain,
Poisson’s ratio, volumetric strain,
Elastic moduli,
Deformation of simple and compound bars under axial load,
Analysis of composite bar with varying cross section.
Page 6 of 8Engineering Materials ScienceMetals LabLEEDS .docxbunyansaturnina
Page 6 of 8Engineering Materials Science
Metals Lab
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT & ENGINEERING
Course: BSc (Hons) Civil Engineering BEng (Hons) Civil Engineering
HND Civil Engineering
Laboratory Experiment:
Stress-Strain Behaviour of Mild Steel and High Yield Steel bars.
Associated Module(s)
Level 4 Engineering Materials Science
Object of Experiment
To investigate the stress-strain behaviour of the above materials.
Theory/Analysis
A knowledge of the behaviour of structural steel under load is essential to ensure structural collapse does not occur and that serviceability requirements are achieved. In these respects the following mechanical properties of a material are required:-
1. The yield stress, σy (or 0.2% proof stress)
2. The Elastic (or Young’s) Modulus, E
3. The maximum tensile strength, σmax
4. The stress at failure, ie the fracture stress, σf
5. The % elongation at failure
Apparatus
1. 500kN Denison Testing Machine
2. Extensometer and Denison extension gauge (measures cross head movement)
3. Grade 250 plain round mild steel bar, 20mm diameter
Characteristic strength = 250 N/mm²
Conforms to BS 4449.
4. Grade 460 deformed high yield steel.
Reinforcing bar, T16, 16mm diameter.
Characteristic strength = 460 N/mm²
Conforms to BS 4449.
Method
Each of the bars in turn is placed in the jaws of the testing machine.
The 50mm extensometer is attached to the bar and zeroed.
Load is applied and recorded in increments up to failure. For each load increment, extension readings from the extensometer and the Denison extension gauge are noted.
At the yield point, the extensometer is removed to prevent damage to it and readings continue on the Denison extension gauge.
The load at failure and the manner of failure are noted.
See the Figure below showing the Test Setup.
(
L
G
values; L
G
= 100 mm for the plain
round
bar, and L
G
= 80 mm for the deformed
high yield
bar
) (
L
G
,
gauge length of the samples
) (
P = the tensile force applied to bars from Dennison testing machine
) (
P
) (
Extension of the sample bars is measured by:
the
Dennison (on-board) extension gauge which monitors cross-head
movement
. This effectively gives sample extension readings from the start of the test (P = 0) through to failure.
An extensometer gauge. This is accurate only over the initial linear-elastic phase of the test.
) (
P
)
Each student should prepare and submit a laboratory report, the results and discussion sections are outlined below:a) Results and Calculations
Readings of load (P), against extension (e), have been recorded for each specimen tested and provided to you (appended at the end of this laboratory briefing document).
Knowing the original bar diameters (d), load data can converted to stress (σ) by dividing each load reading by the appropriate cross sectional area.
Strain values are determined by dividing the extension (e) data by the appropriate gauge length for each bar (LG); the g.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
1. 1
Suddhananda Engineering And Research Center
Bhubaneswar (Odisha)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2
LABORATORY MANUAL
5th
Semester B-Tech
Compiled By: Er. Ambika Nahak
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
2. 2
CONTENTS
Exp.
No.
NAME OF EXPERIMENT Page no
1
To verify strain in an externally loaded beam with the help of a strain gauge
indicator and to verify theoretically.
01
2
To study behavior of columns with different types of end conditions and find
Euler’s buckling load for each case.
03
3
To find the value of flexural rigidity (EI) for a given beam and compare it
with theoretical value.
06
4
To determine the deflection of a pin connected truss analytically &
graphically and verify the same experimentally.
08
5 To verify Maxwell’s reciprocal theorem. 10
6
To verify the moment area theorem regarding the slopes and deflections of
the beam.
12
7
To determine the horizontal thrust in a three hinged arch for a given system
of Loads experimentally and verify the same with calculated values.
14
8
To study two hinged arch for the horizontal displacement of the roller end for
a given system of loading and to compare the same with those obtained
analytically.
18
9 To study the behavior of a portal frame under different end conditions. 20
10
To determine the moment required to produce a given rotation (rotational
stiffness) at one end of the beam when the other end is pinned. 24
3. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 1
EXPERIMENT NO. 1
Aim: - To verify strain in an externally loaded beam with the help of a strain gauge indicator
and to verify theoretically.
Apparatus: - Strain gauge Indicator, weights, hanger, scale, vernier caliper.
Formula: - f = M y
I
Theory: - When a beam is loaded with some external loading, moment & shear force are set
up at each strain. The bending moment at a section tends to deflect the beam &
internal stresses tend to resist its bending. This internal resistance is known as
bending stresses.
Following are the assumptions in theory of simple bending.
1. The material of beam is perfectly homogeneous and isotropic (i.e. have same
elastic properties in all directions.)
2. The beam material is stressed to its elastic limits and thus follows Hook’s law.
3. The transverse section which was plane before bending remains plane after
bending also.
4. The value of young’s modulus of elasticity ‘E’ is same in tension and
compression.
The bending stress at any section can be obtained by beam equation f = (M/I) y
Where, M= moment at considered section.
f = extreme fiber stresses at considered section. I = Moment of inertia at that
section.
y= Extreme fiber distance from neutral axis.
fmax = maximum stress at the farthest fiber i.e. at ymax from neutral axis.
Digital strain indicator is used to measure the strain in static condition. It
incorporates basic bridge balancing network, internal dummy arms, an amplifier
and a digital display to indicate strain value.
In resistance type strain gauge when wire is stretched elastically its length and
diameter gets altered. This results in an overall change of resistance due to change
in both the dimensions. The method is to measure change in resistance, which
occurs as a result of change in the applied load.
Strain can be calculated analytically at the section by using Hook’s law. Distrain
indicator is used to measure the extreme fiber at particular section. It basically
incorporates basic bridge balancing network, internal dummy arms, amplifier &
digital display to indicate strain value.
Two -Arm Bridge requires two strain gauge and will display the strain value two
times of actual. Four -Arm Bridge requires four strain gauge and will display the
strain value four times of actual.
4. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 2
Procedure: -
i. Mount the beam with hanger, at the desired position and strain gauges, over it supports
properly and connect the strain gauges to the digital indicator as per the circuit diagram.
ii. Connect the digital indicator to 230(+/- 10%) colts 50 Hz single phase A.C. power
supply and switch ‘ON’ the apparatus.
iii. Select the two/four arm bridge as required and balance the bridge to display a ‘000’
reading.
iv. Push the ‘GF READ’ switch and adjust the gauge factor to that of the strain gauge used
(generally 2.00)
v. Apply load on the hanger increasingly and note the corresponding strain value.
Observation: - 1) Width of the beam model, B (cm) =
2) Depth of the beam model, D (cm) =
3) Span of the beam, L (cm) =
4) Moment of inertia of beam, I =
Ymax = D/2 =
5) Modulus of elasticity of beam material,
E
=
Observation Table:-
S.
No
Load applied on
the hanger P
( kg)
Moment at the mid
span section ( kg
cm ) = PL/4
f max=
(M/I) Ymax
Theoretical
Strain
Ø = f max E
Observed
strain on
the display
1
2
3
4
5
Sample Calculation: - For reading No. …….
Load applied on the hanger P (kg)
Moment at the mid span section (kg cm) = PL/4 f max= (M/I) Ymax
Theoretical Strain Ø = f max E
Observed strain on the display
Result: - From observation table, it is seen that, the theoretical and observed value of
strain is same.
5. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 3
EXPERIMENT NO. 2
Aim: - To study behavior of different types of columns and find Euler’s buckling load for
each case.
Apparatus: - Column Buckling Apparatus, Weights, Hanger, Dial Gauge, Scale, Verniar
caliper.
Diagram:-
Theory:- If compressive load is applied on a column, the member may fail either by
crushing or by buckling depending on its material, cross section and length. If
member is considerably long in comparison to its lateral dimensions it will fail
by buckling. If a member shows signs of buckling the member leads to failure
with small increase in load. The load at which the member just buckles is called
as crushing load. The buckling load, as given by Euler, can be found by using
following expression.
Where,
E = Modulus of Elasticity = 2 x 105
N/mm2
for steel
I = Least moment of inertia of column section Le = Effective length of column
6. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 4
Depending on support conditions, four cases may arise. The effective length for each of
which are given as:
1. Both ends are fixed le = L/ 2
2. One end is fixed and other is pinned le = L/√ 2
3. Both ends are pinned le = L
4. One end is fixed and other is free le = 2L
Procedure: -
i) Pin a graph paper on the wooden board behind the column.
ii) Apply the load at the top of columns increasing gradually. At certain stage of loading
the columns shows abnormal deflections and gives the buckling load.
iii) Not the buckling load for each of the four columns.
iv) Trace the deflected shapes of the columns over the paper. Mark the points of change of
curvature of the curves and measure the effective or equivalent length for each case
separately.
v) Calculate the theoretical effective lengths and thus buckling loads by the expressions
given above and compare them with the observed values.
Observation: -
1) Width of strip (mm) b =
2) Thickness of strip (mm) t =
3) Length of strip (mm) L =
4) Least moment of inertia I = bt³/12
7. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 5
Observation Table:-
S.No End condition
Euler’s Buckling load Effective Length (mm)
Theoretical Observed Theoretical Observed
1 Both ends fixed
2 One end fixed
and other pinned
3 Both ends pinned
4 One end fixed
and other free
Sample Calculation: - End condition: Both ends fixed
Euler’s buckling load. = P = π² EI
le²
Effective Length (mm) =.
Result :-The theoretical and experimental Euler’s buckling load for each case is found
nearly same.
8. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 6
EXPERIMENT NO. 3
Aim: - To find the value of flexural rigidity (EI) for a given beam and compare it with
theoretical value.
Apparatus: - Elastic Properties of deflected beam, weight’s, hanger, dial gauge, scale, and
Verniar caliper.
Formula: - (1) Central upward deflection, y = w.a.L2
/ 8y ........................................... (1)
(2): EI = w.a. L2
/ 8y................................................................................. (2)
(3) Also it is known that EI for beam = E X bd3
/12.................................(3)
Diagram:-
Theory: - For the beam with two equal overhangs and subjected to two concentrated loads
W each at free ends, maximum deflection y at the centre is given by central
upward deflection.
Central upward deflection, y = w.a.L2
/ 8EI Where,
a = length of overhang on each side W = load applied at the free ends
L = main span
E = modulus of elasticity of the material of the beam I = moment of inertia of
cross section of the beam EI = w.a. L2
/ 8y
It is known that, EI for beam = E X bd3
/12 Where, b = width of beam
d = depth of beam
Procedure: -
i) Find b and d of the beam and calculate the theoretical value of EI by Eq. (3).
ii) Measure the main span and overhang span of the beam with a scale.
iii) By applying equal loads at the free end of the overhang beam, find the central
deflection y.
iv) Repeat the above steps for different loads.
9. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 7
Observation: - 1) Length of main span, L (cm) =
2) Length of overhang on each side, a (cm) =
3) Width of beam, b (cm) =
4) Depth of beam, d (cm) =
5) Modulus of elasticity, E (kg/cm2
) = 2 x 106
Observation Table:-
Sr.
No.
Equal loads at the
two ends (kg)
Dial gauge reading at the
midspan of beam (cm)
EI from
Eq. ( 3 )
EI from
Eq ( 2 )
Calculation: - Average values of EI from observation = ……cm4
Average values of EI
from calculation = …….cm4
Result:-Flexural rigidity (EI) is found same theoretically and experimentally.
Precaution : - Measure the center deflection y very accurately. Ensure that the beam is
devoid of initial curvature.
Loading should be within the elastic limit of the materials.
10. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 8
EXPERIMENT NO. 4
Aim : - To determine the deflection of a pin connected truss analytically & graphically and
verify the same experimentally.
Apparatus: - Truss Apparatus, Weight’s, Hanger, Dial Gauge, Scale, Verniar caliper.
Diagram:-
Theory :-The deflection of a node of a truss under a given loading is determined by:
δ = ∑ (TUL/AE)
Where, δ = deflection at the node point.
T = Force in any member under the given loading.
U = Force in any member under a unit load applied at the point where the
deflection is required. The unit load acts when the loading on the truss have
been removed and acts in the same direction in which the deflection is
required.
L = Length of any member.
A = Cross sectional area of any member.
E = Young’s modulus of elasticity of the material of the member.
Here, (L/AE) is the property of the member, which is equal to its extension per unit
load. It may be determined for each member separately by suspending a load
from it and noting the extension.
Procedure: -
i) Detach each spring from the member. Plot extension against load by suspending load
from the spring and nothing the extension. From the graph, obtain the extension per
unit load (stiffness).
ii) For initial position of the truss, load each node with 0.5 kg load to activate each
member. Now place the dial gauges in position for measuring the deflections and note
down the initial reading in the dial gauges.
iii) Also put additional load of 1kg, at L1, 2kg, L2, and 1kg at L3, and note the final
reading in the dial gauges. The difference between the two readings will give the
desired deflection at the nodal points. Central deflection y.
iv) Calculate the deflection for the three nodes L1, L2, and L3 from the formula given in
Eq. (1) and compare the same with the experimental values obtained in step 3.
11. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 9
v) Draw the Willot – Mohr diagram for deflection and compare the deflection so
obtained experimentally and analytically.
Observation Table:-
Experimental Deflection Values
S.No. Node Deflection L1 L2 L3
1 Initial dial gauge
reading ( mm )
2 Additional loads
( kgs )
3 Final dial gauge
Reading ( mm )
4 Deflection (3) – (1)
(mm)
Analytical Calculation
Memb
er
L/AE F
( kg)
Node L1 Node L2 Node L3
U
( kg)
FUL/A
E
U
( kg)
FUL/
A E
U
(kg)
FUL/A
E
UoU1
U1U2
U2U3
U3U4
LoL1
L1L2
L2L3
L3L4
UoLo
U1L1
U2L2
U3L3
U4L4
U0L1
U1L2
U3L2
U4L3
Sample Calculation: - Member =………….
L/AE = …………
Analytical deflection:= FUL/AE
Result:-The theoretical and experimental deflection in various members is found same.
Precaution : - i) Apply the loads without any jerk.
ii) Measure the deflection to the nearest of a millimeter.
iii) Perform the experiment at a location, which is away from any
iv) External disturbance.
v) Ensure that the supports are rigid.
12. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 10
EXPERIMENT NO. 5
Aim: - To verify Maxwell’s reciprocal theorem
Apparatus: - Clerk Maxwell’s Reciprocal Theorem apparatus, Weight’s, Hanger, Dial
Gauge, Scale, Verniar caliper.
Diagram:-
Theory : -
Maxwell theorem in its simplest form states that deflection of any point A of any elastic
structure due to load P at any point B is same as the deflection of beam due to same load
applied at A
It is, therefore easily derived that the deflection curve for a point in a structure is the same
as the deflected curve of the structure when unit load is applied at the point for which the
influence curve was obtained.
Procedure: -
i) Apply a load either at the centre of the simply supported span or at the free end of
the beam, the deflected form can be obtained.
ii) Measure the height of the beam at certain distance by means of a dial gauge before
and after loading and determine the deflection before and after at each point
separately.
iii) Now move a load along the beam at certain distance and for each positions of the
load, the deflection of the point was noted where the load was applied in
step1.This deflection should be measured at each such point before and after the
loading, separately.
iv) Plot the graph between deflection as ordinate and position of point on abssica the
plot for graph drawn in step2 and 3.These are the influence line ordinates for
deflection of the beam.
13. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 11
Observation Table:-
Distance
from the
pinned
end
Load at central
point/ cantilever end
Deflection of
various
points (mm)
2-3
Load moving along
beam
Deflection
of various
points
(mm) 5-6
Beam
unloaded
Dial
gauge
reading
(mm)2
Beam
loaded
Dial
gauge
reading
(mm)3
Beam
unloaded
Dial gauge
reading
(mm)5
Beam
unloaded
Dial
gauge
reading
(mm)5
Beam
loaded
Dial
gauge
reading
(mm)6
Result : - The Maxwell reciprocal theorem is verified experimentally and analytically.
Precaution: - i) Apply the loads without any jerk.
ii) Perform the experiment at a location, which is away from any
iii) Avoid external disturbance.
iv) Ensure that the supports are rigid.
14. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 12
EXPERIMENT NO. 6
Aim: - To verify the moment area theorem regarding the slopes and deflections of the
beam.
Apparatus: - Moment of area theorem apparatus.
Diagram:-
Theory : - According to moment area theorem
1. The change of slope of the tangents of the elastic curve between any two points of
the deflected beam is equal to the area of M/EI diagram between these two points.
2. The deflection of any point relative to tangent at any other point is equal to the
moment of the area of the M/EI diagram between the two point at which the
deflection is required.
Slope at B= Y2 / b
Since the tangent at C is horizontal due to symmetry,
Slope at B= shaded area / EI = 1 / EI [Wa2
/ 2 + WA (L/2 – a)] Displacement at B
with respect to tangent at C
= (y1 + y2) = Moment of shaded area about B / EI
= 1 / EI [Wa2 / 2 (b+2/3a) + Wa( L/2 –a )(b+ a/2+L/2)]
Procedure: -
1. Measure a, b and L of the beam
2. Place the hangers at equal distance from the supports A and load them with equal loads.
3. Measure the deflection by dial gauges at the end B (y2) and at the center C (y1)
4. Repeat the above steps for different loads.
15. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 13
Observation Table:-
Length of main span, L (cm) = Length of overhang on each side, a (cm) =
Modulus of elasticity, E (kg/cm2
) = 2 x 106
Sl . No. Load at
each
Hanger
(kg)
Central
Deflection
Y1 (cm)
Deflection
at Free end
y2 (cm)
Slope at B
Y2 / b
Deflection
at C=
Deflection
at B (y1)
Calculation:-
1. Calculate the slope at B as y2 / b (measured value).
2. Compute slope and deflection at B theoretically from B.M.D. and compare with
experimental values.
3. Deflection at C = y1(measured value).
4. Deflection at C = Average calculated value
Result :- The slope and deflection obtained is close to the slope and deflection obtained by
suing moment area method.
Precaution:-
Apply the concentration loads without jerks.
Measures the deflection only when the beam attainsion.
Measures the deflection very carefully and accurately.
Check the accuracy and least count of dial gauges used for measuring deflections.
16. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 14
EXPERIMENT NO. 7
Aim: - To determine the horizontal thrust in a three hinged arch or a given system of loads
experimentally and verify the same with calculated values
Apparatus: -The model has a span of 100cm and rise 25cm, with hinges at supports
and crown. One of the end rests on rollers. Along the horizontal span of the
arch various points are marked at equidistant for the application of load. A dial
gauge with magnetic base is supplied with the apparatus.
Theory: A three hinged arch is a statically determinate structure with the axial thrust assisting
in maintaining the stability. The horizontal thrust H in the arch for a number of
loads can be obtained as follows:
Taking moment about A
Taking moment about A
RB L W1 a1 W2 a2 W3 a3
RA
W1 a1 W2 a2 W3 a3
L
Taking moment about B
RA
W1 (L a1) W2 (L a2) W3 (L a3)
LA
Taking the moment of all the forces on left hand side about C, we get
H × r + W1 (
𝐿
2
-a1) + W2 (
𝐿
2
-a1) = RA ×
𝐿
2
H =
1
𝑟
{
1
2
[W1 (L-a1) + W2 (L-a2) + W3 (L-a3) ] – W1 (
𝐿
2
-a1) - W2 (
𝐿
2
-a1)}
H =
1
𝑟
(RBL/2 – W3 (a3 – L/2)
17. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 15
The value of horizontal reaction can be evaluated by Eq. (1).
The influence line of any reaction at a point is a graph showing the variation of
load
functions like reactions, moments, shear forces, stress or deflections at a point for
various positions of unit moving load. Therefore, to draw the influence line for H, a unit
load of 1kg is placed at varying distance x from either of the supports.
Let a load of 1kg be placed at a distance x from A.
RB=
𝑋
𝐿
then, taking moment about C for all the forces on R.H.S. of C we have
𝑥
𝐿
×
𝐿
2
– H × r = 0
H =
𝑥
2𝑟
Thus, the Eq. (2) is the equation of a straight line and gives the influence line diagram for the
horizontal reaction H.
Objective:
1. To determine the horizontal thrust in a three hinged arch for a given system of loads
experimentally and verify the same with calculated values.
2. To obtain influence line diagram for horizontal thrust in a three hinged arch
experimentally and to compare it with the calculated values.
18. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 16
Apparatus:
The model has a span of 100cm and rise 25cm, with hinges at supports and crown.
One of the end rests on rollers. Along the horizontal span of the arch various points are
marked at equidistant for the application of load. A dial gauge with magnetic base is supplied
with the apparatus.
Procedure:
Step1: Use lubricating oil at the roller end of the arch so as to have a free movement of the
roller end. Balance the self-weight of the arch by placing load on the hanger for
horizontal thrust until the best equilibrium conditions are obtained. Under this
condition, the roller end of the arch has a tendency to move inside on tapping the
table. Note down the load in kgs.
Step2: Place a few loads on the arch in any chosen positions. Balance these by placing
additional weights on the hanger for horizontal thrust. The additional weights on the
thrust hanger give the experimental value of the horizontal thrust.
Step3: To obtain the influence line for H, place a load of 2kg in turn on each hanger one by
one and find the balancing weight required on the thrust hanger.
Step4: Plot the ordinate representing ½ of the balancing weights on the load positions as
base. This gives the influence line diagram for horizontal thrust.
Results and Discussions:
1. Find the horizontal thrust for a given set of load experimentally and theoretically.
2. Plot the observed and calculated values of influence line ordinates on the same graph
and comment on the accuracy obtained in the two cases.
Sample Data Sheet:
Span of the arch, L =
Central rise, h =
Initial load on the thrust hanger for balancing, kg =
19. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 17
Table-1
Sl.
No.
Load on
hanger
member from
roller end
Total
load
on
thrust
hanger
(kg)
Distance
from left
hand
support
(cm)
Additional
load on
thrust
hanger i.e.H
(kg)
Calculate
d value of
H (kg)
Set
No.
Load
(kg)
Set I
W1
W2
W3
a1 = a2 = a3 =
Table-2
Initial load on the thrust hanger to balance self weight of arch =kgs
2kgs load at hanger
number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Balancing wt. on thrust
hanger (kg)
Net weights (kg)
Influence line ordinate
(net wt./2) observed
Calculated value of
influence line ordinate
Precautions:
Put the weights in thrust hanger very gently without a jerk.
Measure the distance of loaded points from left hand support accurately.
Perform the experiment away from vibration and other disturbances.
20. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 18
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
Aim: - To study two hinged arch for the horizontal displacement of the roller end for a
given system of loading and to compare the same with those obtained
analytically.
Apparatus: - Two Hinged Arch Apparatus, Weight’s, Hanger, Dial Gauge, Scale, Verniar
Caliper.
Formula: - H = 5WL (a – 2a³ + a4
)
8r Where,
W= Weight applied at end support. L= Span of two hinged arch.
r= rise of two hinged arch. a = dial gauge reading.
Diagram:-
Theory :-The two hinged arch is a statically indeterminate structure of the first degree.
The horizontal thrust is the redundant reaction and is obtained y the use of
strain energy methods. Two hinged arch is made determinate by treating it as a
simply supported curved beam and horizontal thrust as a redundant reaction.
The arch spreads out under external load. Horizontal thrust is the redundant
reaction is obtained by the use of strain energy method.
Procedure: -
i) Fix the dial gauge to measure the movement of the roller end of the model and
keep the lever out of contact.
ii) Place a load of 0.5kg on the central hanger of the arch to remove any slackness
and taking this as the initial position, set the reading on the dial gauge to zero.
iii) Now add 1 kg weights to the hanger and tabulated the horizontal movement of the
roller end with increase in the load in steps of 1 kg. Take the reading up to 5 kg
load. Dial gauge reading should be noted at the time of unloading also.
21. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 19
iv) Plot a graph between the load and displacement (Theoretical and Experimental)
compare. Theoretical values should be computed by using horizontal displacement
formula.
v) Now move the lever in contact with 200gm hanger on ratio 4/1 position with a 1kg
load on the first hanger. Set the initial reading of the dial gauge to zero.
vi) Place additional 5 kg load on the first hanger without shock and observe the dial
gauge reading.
vii) Restore the dial gauge reading to zero by adding loads to the lever hanger, say the
load is w kg.
viii) The experimental values of the influence line ordinate at the first hanger position
shall be 4w/5.
ix) Repeat the steps 5 to 8 for all other hanger loading positions and tabulate. Plot the
influence line ordinates.
x) Compare the experimental values with those obtained theoretically by using
equation. (5).
Observation Table:-
Table: - 1 Horizontal displacement
Sr.No. Central load ( kg ) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Observed horizontal
Displacement ( mm )
Calculated horizontal
Displacement Eq. (4)
Sample Calculation: - Central load (kg) =………..
Observed horizontal Displacement (mm). =
Calculated horizontal Displacement = H = 5WL (a – 2a³ + a4
)
8r
=…………..
Result :-The observed and horizontal displacement is nearly same.
Precaution : - Apply the loads without jerk.
: - Perform the experiment away from vibration and other disturbances.
22. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 20
EXPERIMENT NO. 9
Aim: - To study the behavior of a portal frame under different end conditions.
Apparatus: - Portal Frame Apparatus, Weight’s, Hanger, Dial Gauge, Scale, Verniar
caliper.
Formula : - P h/2 – Rcy b= 0, Rcy = ph/2b
Diagram:-
Theory:- Structures are categorized as statically determinate or as statically indeterminate.
Determinate structures can be analysed additional conditions to solve. The portal
frame is an indeterminate structure to several degree of indeterminacy depending
on the end conditions.
23. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 21
To know the behavior of any frame it is advisable to know its different deflected shapes
under different loading condition, which can be obtained by vertical work energy method
analytically.
Portal structures similar to the end portals of bridge have as their primary purpose, the
transfer of horizontal loads applied at their top to their foundations. Clearance
requirements usually lead to the use of statically indeterminate structure layout for portals,
and approximate solutions are often used in their analysis.
Consider the portal shown in all the member of which are capable of carrying bending and
shear as well as axial force. The legs are hinged at their base and rigidly connected to the
cross girder at the top. This structure is statically indeterminate to the first degree; hence,
one assumption must be made. Solution of this type of structure based on elastic
considerations, show that the total horizontal shear on the portal will be divided almost
equally between the two legs; it will therefore be assumed that the horizontal reactions for
the two legs are equal to each other and therefore equal to P/22
. The remainder of the
analysis can now be carried out by static .The vertical reaction on the right leg can be
obtained by taking moment about the hinge at the base of the left leg. The vertical reaction
on the left leg can then be found by applying fy = 0 to the entire structure. Once the
reactions are known, the diagrams of bending moment and shear are easily computed,
leading to values for bending moment as given in fig (b). It is well to visualize the
deformed shape of the portal under the action of the applied load.
Consider now portal similar in some ways to of fig. (a) but with the bases of the legs fixed
as shown in fig(c) This structure is statically indeterminate to the third degree, so that three
assumptions must be made. As when the legs were hinged at their base, it will again be
assumed that the horizontal reaction for the two legs are equal and hence equal to P/2. It
will be noted that near the center of each leg there is point of reversal of curvature. These
are points of inflection, where the bending moment is changing sign and hence has zero
value.
24. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 22
Procedure: -
i) Select the end conditions of the portal frame.
ii) Select the point where loading is to be applied (first horizontal than vertical
separately).
iii) To obtain the deflected shape of the frame, measure the deflection at various points
at legs and the beam separately as detailed below.
iv) Fix the dial gauge and adjust them to zero on one of the leg at various points and
measure the vertical distance from the end of these points.
v) Now apply the load at the point selected for loading.
vi) Note down the dial gauge readings
vii) Unload the frame and shift the dial gauge to another leg and repeat the above (4),
(5). (6).
viii) Again unload the frame and shift the dial gauge to the beam of the frame and
repeated (4), (5). (6).
ix) Tabulate the observed reading and sketch the deflected shape for the portal frame
on the graph sheet.
x) Repeat the above steps (1) to (9) for various ends conditions and loading conditions
to obtain the deflected shape.
Observation Table:-
Table: - 1
Points on AC Distance of
Point from C
Dial gauge reading Deflections
( mm )
Initial Final
Table: - 2
Points on AB Distance of
Point from A
Dial gauge reading Deflections
( mm )
Initial Final
25. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 23
Table: - 3
Points on BD Distance of
Point from D
Dial gauge reading Deflections
( mm )
Initial Final
Sample Calculation: - 1) Portal frame with end conditions =
2) Loading point x on AC/AB/BD
Load applied = kg
Result: - The horizontal displacement obtained theoretically and experimentally is nearly
same,
Precaution : - Apply the load without jerk.
: - Perform the experiment away from vibration and other disturbances.
26. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 24
EXPERIMENT NO 10
Aim: - To determine the moment required to produce a given rotation (rotational stiffness)
at one end of the beam when the other end is pinned.
Diagram:
Theory : -
For a beam AB which is simply supported at A and fixed at B , a clock – wise rotation of
ØA can be effected by applying a clockwise moment of MA ={ 4EI / L }X ØA at A, =
stiffness X Rotation which in turn induces a clockwise moment of MB = 1 / 2 MA on the
member at B. The expression MA ={ 4EI / L } is called the stiffness factor, which is
defined as the moment required to be applied at A to cause a rotation of 1 radian at A of a
span AB simply supported at A and fixed at B . The number MA / MB = + 1 / 2 is the carry
over factor, which is the ratio of the moment induced at B due to the moment applied at A.
If the far end is hinged instead of being fixed, the moment required to rotate the tangent at
the near end through 1 radian will be 3EI / L instead of { 4EI / L }
Moment required to produce a given rotation at one end of the beam when the other end is
pinned is 3 / 4 th
of the moment required to produce the same rotation when the other end
is fixed.
Procedure: - (A) Beam with overhang having far end pinned.
1. Measure the height of free end C of the beam from the top of the table.
2. Load W is applied at the free end C. The beam will get deflected as shown in the
Measure the height of the deflected end C from the table top. The difference will give
the deflection y.
27. Structural Analysis Lab 2
Page 25
3. Measure the deflection Y at C and find the slope (Y/a) at A.
4. Repeat the above steps for different loads.
(B) Beam with overhang having far end fixed.
1. Repeat all the steps as in beam with far end connected.
A graph is plotted between moment as ordinate and slopes for pinned end and slopes for
fixed end as abscissa.
Find the ratio of moments in the two cases for the same slope.
Observation Table:-
a =…......... cm
Sr..No Load W ( kg ) Far end pinned Far end fixed
Deflection y
( cm )
Slope y / a
radian
Deflection y
( cm )
Slope y / a
rad
Calculation: - Load = …… kg.
Deflection: …….
Slope: …………
Result: - The produced at one end of the beam when the other end is pinned is give by
………….
Precaution:-
Measures the deflection of the free end C of the beam very accurately. Apply the
load at the free end without any jerks.
Perform this experiment away from any external disturbances.