Sse cola wars_group#4a_2011
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•377 views
The concentrate industry is highly profitable and attractive due to relatively high bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, high barriers to entry for competitors, and low switching costs for consumers despite potential emotional costs to change brands. In contrast, the bottling industry has relatively low profitability and attractiveness due to high bargaining power of buyers, high barriers to entry, and high switching costs for retailers. The two major concentrate producers, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, control prices in both industries, with the concentrate market having low competition and the bottling industry facing high competition.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Cola Wars Con
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces model. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in concentrate production and their diversification efforts. The bargaining power of buyers is also low as retailers need Coke and Pepsi products to meet consumer demand. Barriers to entry are high due to the strong brands and distribution relationships of Coke and Pepsi. Rivalry between the two companies is high as they compete for market share leadership. Challenges for the future include maintaining their brand images and exploring growth in new markets and product categories beyond carbonated soft drinks.
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
This document analyzes the cola wars case study through the lens of Porter's Five Forces model for both the concentrated producer industry and bottling industry.
For the concentrated producer industry, the document finds low threat of new entry, substitution, and supplier power, as well as moderate customer power. This results in an attractive industry. For bottlers, the document finds moderate threat of substitution, supplier power, and customer power, as well as low threat of new entry, resulting in a moderately attractive industry with higher forces and smaller margins than concentrated producers.
SSE ColaWars Group5
This document discusses the Coca Cola concentrate and bottling businesses using Porter's Five Forces analysis. It finds that the concentrate business has high barriers to entry due to costly R&D and manufacturing. Competition is intense between Coca Cola and Pepsi who dominate the duopoly market. For bottlers, barriers to entry are also high due to capital requirements and exclusive territories. Competition is more limited for bottlers linked to concentrate producers. Overall, both the concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable but to different extents, with concentrate producers adding more value through branding and recipes.
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
This document analyzes the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo concentrate producer and bottler industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producer industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottler industry has consolidated considerably and bottlers have weak bargaining power against concentrate producers. Both industries face challenges from stagnating carbonated soft drink consumption and increasing costs, driving both to diversify into new products and markets like Asia to maintain profitability.
Case analysis coke_pepsi
This document analyzes the soft drink industry, specifically Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and discusses factors that contribute to the profitability of concentrate producers over bottlers. It examines Porter's five forces and determines that suppliers, buyers, substitutes and potential entrants do not greatly threaten the industry's profitability. While internal rivalry is intense between Coke and Pepsi, they primarily compete through advertising rather than lowering prices. The document concludes that vertical integration of concentrate producers into bottling may not be necessary, as bottlers already have incentives to cooperate, and contract amendments could ensure efficient investment in bottling infrastructure.
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
This document analyzes the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottling industry also has high consolidation and bottlers have limited choice of concentrate producers. While the carbonated soft drink market is declining, it still represents 40% of the soft drink market, and the big companies are focusing on value-added products and investing in growing markets like Asia to counter pressures in mature markets.
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low for both concentrate producers and bottlers due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in procurement and efforts to diversify. However, barriers to entry are high and rivalry is intense between the two concentrate producers due to their strong brands and distribution relationships. Bottlers face even higher barriers and less rivalry due to exclusive territories. A key challenge is preserving brand image to maintain barriers against other producers seeking to enter the market.
Cola Wars
This document discusses the cola wars between Pepsi and Coca-Cola and analyzes the profitability and attractiveness of the concentrate and bottling industries. It finds that while the concentrate industry remains profitable due to its duopoly structure and low costs, the bottling industry's attractiveness varies over time and by region due to challenges like health debates, environmental issues, and changing industry dynamics. The cola wars had mixed effects, hurting profits initially but later spurring innovation and growth as prices rose after the price war ended.
Recommended
Cola Wars Con
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces model. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in concentrate production and their diversification efforts. The bargaining power of buyers is also low as retailers need Coke and Pepsi products to meet consumer demand. Barriers to entry are high due to the strong brands and distribution relationships of Coke and Pepsi. Rivalry between the two companies is high as they compete for market share leadership. Challenges for the future include maintaining their brand images and exploring growth in new markets and product categories beyond carbonated soft drinks.
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
This document analyzes the cola wars case study through the lens of Porter's Five Forces model for both the concentrated producer industry and bottling industry.
For the concentrated producer industry, the document finds low threat of new entry, substitution, and supplier power, as well as moderate customer power. This results in an attractive industry. For bottlers, the document finds moderate threat of substitution, supplier power, and customer power, as well as low threat of new entry, resulting in a moderately attractive industry with higher forces and smaller margins than concentrated producers.
SSE ColaWars Group5
This document discusses the Coca Cola concentrate and bottling businesses using Porter's Five Forces analysis. It finds that the concentrate business has high barriers to entry due to costly R&D and manufacturing. Competition is intense between Coca Cola and Pepsi who dominate the duopoly market. For bottlers, barriers to entry are also high due to capital requirements and exclusive territories. Competition is more limited for bottlers linked to concentrate producers. Overall, both the concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable but to different extents, with concentrate producers adding more value through branding and recipes.
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
This document analyzes the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo concentrate producer and bottler industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producer industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottler industry has consolidated considerably and bottlers have weak bargaining power against concentrate producers. Both industries face challenges from stagnating carbonated soft drink consumption and increasing costs, driving both to diversify into new products and markets like Asia to maintain profitability.
Case analysis coke_pepsi
This document analyzes the soft drink industry, specifically Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and discusses factors that contribute to the profitability of concentrate producers over bottlers. It examines Porter's five forces and determines that suppliers, buyers, substitutes and potential entrants do not greatly threaten the industry's profitability. While internal rivalry is intense between Coke and Pepsi, they primarily compete through advertising rather than lowering prices. The document concludes that vertical integration of concentrate producers into bottling may not be necessary, as bottlers already have incentives to cooperate, and contract amendments could ensure efficient investment in bottling infrastructure.
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
This document analyzes the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottling industry also has high consolidation and bottlers have limited choice of concentrate producers. While the carbonated soft drink market is declining, it still represents 40% of the soft drink market, and the big companies are focusing on value-added products and investing in growing markets like Asia to counter pressures in mature markets.
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low for both concentrate producers and bottlers due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in procurement and efforts to diversify. However, barriers to entry are high and rivalry is intense between the two concentrate producers due to their strong brands and distribution relationships. Bottlers face even higher barriers and less rivalry due to exclusive territories. A key challenge is preserving brand image to maintain barriers against other producers seeking to enter the market.
Cola Wars
This document discusses the cola wars between Pepsi and Coca-Cola and analyzes the profitability and attractiveness of the concentrate and bottling industries. It finds that while the concentrate industry remains profitable due to its duopoly structure and low costs, the bottling industry's attractiveness varies over time and by region due to challenges like health debates, environmental issues, and changing industry dynamics. The cola wars had mixed effects, hurting profits initially but later spurring innovation and growth as prices rose after the price war ended.
Cola Wars Continue
The soft drink industry has been highly profitable since 1970 due to steady consumption growth and intense competition between Coke and Pepsi that reinforced brand recognition without diminishing profits. The industry faces high barriers to entry including recipe development, manufacturing plants, and distribution networks. While the North American market is mature, growth opportunities exist in developing markets like China and India to sustain profits and historical growth rates over the next decade.
Sse Cola Wars Group8
The document discusses Porter's five forces analysis of the concentrate industry occupied by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. It finds the industry has high rivalry between the two major competitors and barriers to entry. There are many potential substitute products and buyer power is high due to various retail channels. Regulations differ between countries, affecting business operations on a global scale.
Sse Colawars Group4
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from the 20th century into the 21st century. It analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. The document outlines that while Coke and Pepsi saw major growth in the late 20th century, consumption began declining in the late 1990s. It also notes that as the cola wars continued into the 21st century, the companies faced challenges in modifying their bottling, pricing, and branding strategies to adapt to changes in the industry and rise of substitutes. Finally, it provides references used in the analysis.
Sse Cola Wars Group2
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has faced more challenges with market saturation and lower profitability compared to the CSD industry. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition and challenges from industry giants pursuing low pricing and expansion strategies.
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the carbonated soft drink industry. It provides background on the industry structure, noting that Coke and Pepsi dominate as concentrate producers while bottling operations are carried out by other companies. The intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has driven up advertising spending and innovation, strengthening their brands while weakening smaller competitors. Despite declining demand for sugary drinks, Coke and Pepsi may be able to sustain profits by diversifying their product lines and marketing to address health consciousness.
Cola wars 2010
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.
Colawars
The document analyzes the strategic rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the cola industry and its implications. It finds that: 1) consolidation has made it difficult for smaller competitors to compete and exposed the large firms to antitrust issues; 2) bottlers face slim margins and declining growth; and 3) while international markets provide most profits, health concerns and changing consumer preferences threaten domestic performance. It recommends companies innovate health-focused products, refocus on advertising, and use game theory to understand competition.
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
The document analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds the industry is very profitable due to its oligopolistic structure with high barriers to entry. Concentrate producers (CPs) earn higher profits than bottlers. This is because CPs have more added value from their branded products and strategic capabilities, while bottlers have less value from operational effectiveness alone. Contracts between CPs and bottlers strategically favor the CPs through territorial exclusivity and pricing flexibility. The document concludes CPs should not vertically integrate into bottling given their current high profitability in concentrates versus bottlers' declining profits.
Sse Colawars Group11
The document discusses the competitive landscape of the cola concentrate and bottling industries. It analyzes each industry using Porter's Five Forces model. For the concentrate industry, competitive rivalry is high due to a settled duopoly market between Coke and Pepsi with slow growth. However, competition is not primarily around price. For bottlers, competitive rivalry is also high as the product is identical and companies must compete on price and relationships with concentrate suppliers. Both industries face low threats of new entrants or substitution due to high capital requirements and established brand positions.
Sse Cola Wars Group5
The document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds that the concentrate industry has a moderate threat of new entrants due to low barriers to entry. Rivalry among Coke and Pepsi is intense due to their duopoly, slow industry growth, and high marketing costs. The threat of substitutes is also high given rising popularity of other beverages.
Cola Wars Continues - 2006
Cola Wars have continues till date. This presentation presents an analysis of the case Cola wars continues in 2006.
Find out what we have to say about the classic case of competition.
Cola wars continue final
The document provides a history and overview of Coke and Pepsi in 2006. It discusses the origins of each company in the late 1800s and their growth throughout the 20th century. It also analyzes their strategies, marketing, relationships with bottlers, and challenges faced in the 2000s from declining soda consumption and rising alternatives. Both companies diversified their portfolios and pursued international growth to address the changing landscape.
Sse Cola Wars Group4
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi and analyzes the major participants in the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces model. It identifies the key players as concentrate producers, bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. It then analyzes the industries using the five forces of supplier power, threat of entry, industry rivalry, substitute competition, and buyer power. Finally, it compares the economics and attractiveness of concentrate producers versus bottlers and discusses challenges facing the cola industry's repositioning.
Cola Wars03
The Coca-Cola and PepsiCo cola wars lasted from the 1950s to the 1990s as they battled for dominance in the US soft drink market. In the 21st century, both companies faced new challenges as carbonated soft drink sales began to flatten. They explored ways to boost domestic sales through innovation and boost revenue through profitable new beverages as consumer preferences shifted towards healthier options. While Coca-Cola struggled with execution issues, PepsiCo flourished through acquisitions and international expansion, gaining global market share over its rival. Both companies addressed slowing cola sales by diversifying their product portfolios and pursuing growth in non-carbonated drinks and bottled water.
SSE_cola wars_group4b_2011
1) The Coca-Cola and Pepsi concentrate industries have high rivalry due to slow growth and two equally sized competitors fighting for leadership through branding and pricing. Entry barriers are also high.
2) The bottling industry has moderate rivalry between brands but low rivalry between bottlers of the same brand. Entry barriers are also low. Retailers have significant bargaining power over bottlers.
3) Both industries face challenges from increasing health concerns, a saturated carbonated soft drink market, and growing power of retailers.
Sse Cola Wars Group2
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high concentration among a few players and high costs of entry.
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
The document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 1970 to 2010. It describes how consumption of carbonated soft drinks grew steadily at 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 due to increasing availability, new diet and flavored varieties, and declining prices. While Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominated the cola segment, their market share has declined in recent years as consumers have shifted to healthier beverage alternatives like water, juice, and sports drinks. Both companies have adapted by expanding their product portfolios internationally and acquiring companies in the snack and beverage industries to sustain profits in the face of flattening carbonated soft drink demand.
Cola Wars
This document analyzes the competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using various frameworks including Porter's Five Forces, PEST analysis, and the resource-based view. It finds that Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink oligopoly through brand loyalty and large marketing budgets that create barriers to entry. While demand is slowing domestically, growth opportunities exist in international markets like China. Both companies operate in fast economic times and imitate each other's strategies, though their secret cola formulas and brand images remain rare and valuable resources.
Cola wars in india
The document summarizes the cola wars between Pepsi and Coca-Cola in India from the 1950s to the 1990s. It discusses how both companies initially left India but then returned, with Pepsi partnering with an Indian company in 1986 and Coca-Cola re-entering directly in 1993. The document also analyzes the different strategies adopted by each company in terms of bottling models, promotions, marketing research, logistics management, and human resources. Overall, it provides a high-level overview of the competitive strategies employed by Pepsi and Coca-Cola as they battled for market share in the Indian cola industry over several decades.
A Web Marketing and Social Media Primer for Traditional Industries
The document discusses using social media for marketing by distributors. It defines social media as online conversations between real people using websites or platforms. Some benefits of social media include engaging clients, differentiation, and building trust in a cost effective manner. The document lists common social media tools like blogs, videos, comments/ratings, and networks. It emphasizes being authentic and ensuring marketing fits within social media. A warning is given about mixing new marketing approaches with traditional foundations without a coherent strategy.
Challenges facing Industrial Sector In Sudan
This paper give an idea about the challenges that are facing the industrial sector in Sudan
It was prepared for the European Union Commission in Sudan as part of a study for the Sudanese Economy
Sadara Corporate Awareness
Sadara is a joint venture between Saudi Aramco and Dow Chemical to build a large petrochemical complex in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. The complex will use refinery liquids like naphtha as feedstock to produce intermediate goods and products like ethylene, propylene, benzene, and toluene. These intermediates are then used to manufacture final products like polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, and other chemicals through processes like cracking, hydrogenation, and oxidation. The complex will enable many new industries in Saudi Arabia and create thousands of jobs.
More Related Content
What's hot
Cola Wars Continue
The soft drink industry has been highly profitable since 1970 due to steady consumption growth and intense competition between Coke and Pepsi that reinforced brand recognition without diminishing profits. The industry faces high barriers to entry including recipe development, manufacturing plants, and distribution networks. While the North American market is mature, growth opportunities exist in developing markets like China and India to sustain profits and historical growth rates over the next decade.
Sse Cola Wars Group8
The document discusses Porter's five forces analysis of the concentrate industry occupied by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. It finds the industry has high rivalry between the two major competitors and barriers to entry. There are many potential substitute products and buyer power is high due to various retail channels. Regulations differ between countries, affecting business operations on a global scale.
Sse Colawars Group4
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from the 20th century into the 21st century. It analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. The document outlines that while Coke and Pepsi saw major growth in the late 20th century, consumption began declining in the late 1990s. It also notes that as the cola wars continued into the 21st century, the companies faced challenges in modifying their bottling, pricing, and branding strategies to adapt to changes in the industry and rise of substitutes. Finally, it provides references used in the analysis.
Sse Cola Wars Group2
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has faced more challenges with market saturation and lower profitability compared to the CSD industry. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition and challenges from industry giants pursuing low pricing and expansion strategies.
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the carbonated soft drink industry. It provides background on the industry structure, noting that Coke and Pepsi dominate as concentrate producers while bottling operations are carried out by other companies. The intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has driven up advertising spending and innovation, strengthening their brands while weakening smaller competitors. Despite declining demand for sugary drinks, Coke and Pepsi may be able to sustain profits by diversifying their product lines and marketing to address health consciousness.
Cola wars 2010
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.
Colawars
The document analyzes the strategic rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the cola industry and its implications. It finds that: 1) consolidation has made it difficult for smaller competitors to compete and exposed the large firms to antitrust issues; 2) bottlers face slim margins and declining growth; and 3) while international markets provide most profits, health concerns and changing consumer preferences threaten domestic performance. It recommends companies innovate health-focused products, refocus on advertising, and use game theory to understand competition.
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
The document analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds the industry is very profitable due to its oligopolistic structure with high barriers to entry. Concentrate producers (CPs) earn higher profits than bottlers. This is because CPs have more added value from their branded products and strategic capabilities, while bottlers have less value from operational effectiveness alone. Contracts between CPs and bottlers strategically favor the CPs through territorial exclusivity and pricing flexibility. The document concludes CPs should not vertically integrate into bottling given their current high profitability in concentrates versus bottlers' declining profits.
Sse Colawars Group11
The document discusses the competitive landscape of the cola concentrate and bottling industries. It analyzes each industry using Porter's Five Forces model. For the concentrate industry, competitive rivalry is high due to a settled duopoly market between Coke and Pepsi with slow growth. However, competition is not primarily around price. For bottlers, competitive rivalry is also high as the product is identical and companies must compete on price and relationships with concentrate suppliers. Both industries face low threats of new entrants or substitution due to high capital requirements and established brand positions.
Sse Cola Wars Group5
The document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds that the concentrate industry has a moderate threat of new entrants due to low barriers to entry. Rivalry among Coke and Pepsi is intense due to their duopoly, slow industry growth, and high marketing costs. The threat of substitutes is also high given rising popularity of other beverages.
Cola Wars Continues - 2006
Cola Wars have continues till date. This presentation presents an analysis of the case Cola wars continues in 2006.
Find out what we have to say about the classic case of competition.
Cola wars continue final
The document provides a history and overview of Coke and Pepsi in 2006. It discusses the origins of each company in the late 1800s and their growth throughout the 20th century. It also analyzes their strategies, marketing, relationships with bottlers, and challenges faced in the 2000s from declining soda consumption and rising alternatives. Both companies diversified their portfolios and pursued international growth to address the changing landscape.
Sse Cola Wars Group4
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi and analyzes the major participants in the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces model. It identifies the key players as concentrate producers, bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. It then analyzes the industries using the five forces of supplier power, threat of entry, industry rivalry, substitute competition, and buyer power. Finally, it compares the economics and attractiveness of concentrate producers versus bottlers and discusses challenges facing the cola industry's repositioning.
Cola Wars03
The Coca-Cola and PepsiCo cola wars lasted from the 1950s to the 1990s as they battled for dominance in the US soft drink market. In the 21st century, both companies faced new challenges as carbonated soft drink sales began to flatten. They explored ways to boost domestic sales through innovation and boost revenue through profitable new beverages as consumer preferences shifted towards healthier options. While Coca-Cola struggled with execution issues, PepsiCo flourished through acquisitions and international expansion, gaining global market share over its rival. Both companies addressed slowing cola sales by diversifying their product portfolios and pursuing growth in non-carbonated drinks and bottled water.
SSE_cola wars_group4b_2011
1) The Coca-Cola and Pepsi concentrate industries have high rivalry due to slow growth and two equally sized competitors fighting for leadership through branding and pricing. Entry barriers are also high.
2) The bottling industry has moderate rivalry between brands but low rivalry between bottlers of the same brand. Entry barriers are also low. Retailers have significant bargaining power over bottlers.
3) Both industries face challenges from increasing health concerns, a saturated carbonated soft drink market, and growing power of retailers.
Sse Cola Wars Group2
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high concentration among a few players and high costs of entry.
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
The document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 1970 to 2010. It describes how consumption of carbonated soft drinks grew steadily at 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 due to increasing availability, new diet and flavored varieties, and declining prices. While Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominated the cola segment, their market share has declined in recent years as consumers have shifted to healthier beverage alternatives like water, juice, and sports drinks. Both companies have adapted by expanding their product portfolios internationally and acquiring companies in the snack and beverage industries to sustain profits in the face of flattening carbonated soft drink demand.
Cola Wars
This document analyzes the competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using various frameworks including Porter's Five Forces, PEST analysis, and the resource-based view. It finds that Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink oligopoly through brand loyalty and large marketing budgets that create barriers to entry. While demand is slowing domestically, growth opportunities exist in international markets like China. Both companies operate in fast economic times and imitate each other's strategies, though their secret cola formulas and brand images remain rare and valuable resources.
What's hot (18)
Viewers also liked
Cola wars in india
The document summarizes the cola wars between Pepsi and Coca-Cola in India from the 1950s to the 1990s. It discusses how both companies initially left India but then returned, with Pepsi partnering with an Indian company in 1986 and Coca-Cola re-entering directly in 1993. The document also analyzes the different strategies adopted by each company in terms of bottling models, promotions, marketing research, logistics management, and human resources. Overall, it provides a high-level overview of the competitive strategies employed by Pepsi and Coca-Cola as they battled for market share in the Indian cola industry over several decades.
A Web Marketing and Social Media Primer for Traditional Industries
The document discusses using social media for marketing by distributors. It defines social media as online conversations between real people using websites or platforms. Some benefits of social media include engaging clients, differentiation, and building trust in a cost effective manner. The document lists common social media tools like blogs, videos, comments/ratings, and networks. It emphasizes being authentic and ensuring marketing fits within social media. A warning is given about mixing new marketing approaches with traditional foundations without a coherent strategy.
Challenges facing Industrial Sector In Sudan
This paper give an idea about the challenges that are facing the industrial sector in Sudan
It was prepared for the European Union Commission in Sudan as part of a study for the Sudanese Economy
Sadara Corporate Awareness
Sadara is a joint venture between Saudi Aramco and Dow Chemical to build a large petrochemical complex in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. The complex will use refinery liquids like naphtha as feedstock to produce intermediate goods and products like ethylene, propylene, benzene, and toluene. These intermediates are then used to manufacture final products like polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, and other chemicals through processes like cracking, hydrogenation, and oxidation. The complex will enable many new industries in Saudi Arabia and create thousands of jobs.
Ads analysis
This document analyzes several advertisements and the marketing techniques they employ. The Pepsi ad uses value association to suggest drinking Pepsi makes one feel young by showing an adult blowing bubbles. The Honda ad shows love and uses branding by depicting a neighborhood where everyone owns a Honda, implying it is a popular choice. The Shure earphones ad shows fun and pleasure for having "two very happy ears" and employs branding through its many awards and positive reviews. Finally, the UPS ad shows power by enabling businesses to do more through faster delivery and uses value association, implying those who value their business should use UPS.
CPK in Eurocrypt 2007 Rump Session
This document describes a bounded identity-based encryption system that does not require a bilinear map. It uses a secret matrix S that is private to the domain, and secret keys are generated from rows in S corresponding to a user's identity. The public matrix P is generated from S using exponentiation. The system aims to provide security even under collusion attacks, with the size of the matrix scaling up based on the number of potential colluders. The document considers questions around the security and collision properties of the system, and compares it to other identity-based encryption approaches.
Magazine advertisment analysis
The document analyzes an advertisement for Ellie Goulding's album "Lights". It notes that the ad features a close-up image of Ellie, allowing her to promote herself and show confidence in her work. Details like her natural makeup and facial expressions convey that her music has depth rather than being overly dramatic or sexy. Elements like the exaggerated album title in the ad's text style are meant to catch the eye and promote both Ellie and her album. The color scheme and uncluttered design create a relaxed atmosphere to engage the target audience.
Presentation on television advertisements
Television advertising began in 1941 with a Bulova watch commercial and has since grown to a $175.4 billion global industry in 2016. Television accounts for 38% of total advertising spending and is the second fastest growing market in Asia. Effective TV ads utilize various forms like animation, documentaries, and testimonials to reach large audiences through mass coverage and sensory appeals. Strategic use of elements like camera angles, music, and editing help TV ads connect with viewers.
How to Read an Advertisement
The document provides instructions on how to analyze advertisements by examining the point of view, position, posture, and person speaking. It explains that point of view refers to the camera angle and what the advertiser is trying to convey through it. Position looks at where the product is placed and why. Posture considers the actors' expressions and body language. Person speaking identifies who is addressing the viewer and why that speaker was selected. The document uses examples to illustrate each element and prompts the reader to analyze ads using these techniques.
Laws on retrenchment and HR implications
This document discusses the laws around retrenchment in Malaysia and its implications for human resource management practices. It defines retrenchment as the termination of employment contracts for employees deemed surplus due to factors like restructuring or economic downturn. The document outlines relevant statutes governing retrenchment in Malaysia and findings from court cases that revealed many retrenchments were ruled against employers for poor workforce selection processes or mishandling of retrenchment. It recommends viewing retrenchment as a proactive rather than reactive process involving effective planning and exploring alternatives before use as a last resort.
Secondary sector
This document discusses the history of industrialization in Spain from the late 19th century to present day. It began later in Spain than other European countries due to traditional agriculture, lack of investment, and political issues. The main early industrial regions were the Basque Country and Catalonia. Industrialization accelerated after 1950 under Franco and Spain entered the world economy. Today, Spain faces challenges with industry size, research investment, and technology backwardness compared to other countries.
Mark zuckerberg
This document summarizes key information about Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and co-founder of Facebook. It outlines his education background, career highlights such as founding Facebook and its growth, achievements like being named Person of the Year by Time magazine, and his contribution to developing Facebook into a platform with over 1 billion users. It also notes his early interest in computers and creating programming as a child that foreshadowed his future success.
Advertisment
The document discusses different types of advertising including their purposes, pros, cons, and common methods. It defines advertising as a communication method used to persuade customers to purchase particular brands and increase consumption. The key steps in marketing are identified as market research, product development, and promotion. Some pros are that advertising can increase sales, raise living standards by introducing new products, and be found through various media. Cons mentioned are that advertising can encourage purchasing unneeded items and make people feel inadequate. Common advertising types outlined are outdoor, broadcast, covert, surrogate, and celebrity advertising.
PANPA Advertising and Marketing Awards Presentation
This document outlines the winners of various advertising, marketing, and media awards across different categories. It includes categories for best print and digital advertisements, campaigns, innovations and ideas for both clients and trade. It also recognizes teams and individuals for excellence in areas like creative services, marketing, and sales. Winners are listed for community, regional, and national/metropolitan levels from publications in Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore.
Mark zuckerberg ppt
Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO and co-founder of Facebook. He was born in 1984 in New York and attended Harvard where he created early versions of Facebook called CourseMatch and FaceMash. In 2004, while still in college, he launched Thefacebook.com which later became Facebook. As CEO, Zuckerberg has led Facebook's growth into a platform with over 2 billion monthly users. He is known for his innovative skills, belief in his ideas, and introverted personality. Zuckerberg was named 2010 Time Person of the Year and has a net worth of over $36 billion, making him one of the richest entrepreneurs in the world.
RETRENCHMENT UNDER THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947
This document summarizes Indian labor law regarding retrenchment. It defines retrenchment as the termination of an employee's services by the employer for any reason other than as punishment. Originally, Indian law did not require compensation for retrenchment, but amendments in 1953, 1964, and 1976 established compensation requirements. The 1976 amendment distinguished between industries employing over 100 workers, for which special provisions apply, and other industries covered under the original Chapter V-A. Both chapters require employers to follow principles of seniority-based layoffs and re-employment of retrenched workers. Employers must also follow notice periods and compensation levels specified in the applicable chapter or face penalties.
Mainstream and inderpendant products
This document discusses several media corporations and organizations:
- News Corporation was a multinational mass media corporation headquartered in New York that included properties like Fox Broadcasting, Fox Sports, and Fox News. It was split into 21st Century Fox and News Corp in 2013.
- The BBC is a British public service broadcaster funded by television licenses. It was formed in 1922 and includes BBC News, BBC Weather, and BBC programming across television, radio, and online.
- London Live is a local television channel in London that airs local news, arts, entertainment and replays of older TV shows. It is owned by ESTV which has several individual owners.
- The difference between international, national and local corporations is
Coca Cola vs Pepsi
The document analyzes the global soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It discusses the high level of rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control 74.8% of the market. The threat of substitutes is also high given the many alternative beverage options. The document recommends that in India, Coca-Cola should develop its strategy to tap into the large rural market, pursue consolidation opportunities, and develop "nutritious" beverages to address health concerns.
Unlocking Corporate Innovation; Context, Capability, Culture & Collaboration
A decade of constant digital disruption has left most industries vulnerable…….Mature, stable systems, processes and infrastructure limit the capabilities and culture of multinational companies.
Innovation is now TOP 5 for 65%+ of organisations
Corporate self awareness & realisation of limitations means Heads of Innovation looking to partners to help evolve into innovative cultures & test new grounds
How does an organisation unlock the power of innovation?
Television advertising techniques
This document discusses various styles, techniques, and conventions used in television advertising. It provides examples of different styles such as documentary, mini fiction, animation and talking heads. It also discusses techniques like hidden messages, overt messages, emotional response, celebrity endorsement, and repetition. Finally, it covers conventions such as soundtracks, brand logos, dialogue, special effects, and characteristics of products/services including benefits, advantages over competitors, and lifestyle appeal. The document is an overview of creative and marketing elements commonly employed in television commercials.
Viewers also liked (20)
A Web Marketing and Social Media Primer for Traditional Industries
A Web Marketing and Social Media Primer for Traditional Industries
PANPA Advertising and Marketing Awards Presentation
PANPA Advertising and Marketing Awards Presentation
RETRENCHMENT UNDER THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947
RETRENCHMENT UNDER THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947
Unlocking Corporate Innovation; Context, Capability, Culture & Collaboration
Unlocking Corporate Innovation; Context, Capability, Culture & Collaboration
Similar to Sse cola wars_group#4a_2011
Sse Cola Wars Group2
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high barriers to entry, concentration among a few major players, and threats of substitution from alternative packaging types. Both industries have potential challenges from market saturation and competitive strategies of the major brands.
Sse colawars group7a_2011
The document analyzes and compares the CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry and bottler industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds that the CSD industry faces less threats from external forces like suppliers, buyers, and substitutes. This makes the CSD industry more attractive and profitable than the bottler industry, which faces greater threats from these external forces. Emerging issues like health concerns, environmental impacts, and saturated markets may pose future challenges to the profitability and competitiveness of both industries.
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
The document analyzes Porter's five forces model for the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between major concentrate producers like Coca-Cola due to balanced competition and low barriers to entry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential for firms in the industry. The profitability of concentrate producers is also impacted by having few suppliers and substitutes, strong buyer power of major retailers, and threat from new innovations like Red Bull entering the market.
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
The document discusses Porter's five forces model as it applies to the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between existing concentrate firms due to balanced competitors and low growth in the industry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential. The document also compares the concentrate business to the bottling business, finding that profitability differs between the two.
Sse Cola Wars Group6
The document analyzes the profitability of the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's five forces model. For the concentrate industry, rivalry among existing competitors is high due to fierce competition, while threats of new entrance and bargaining power of suppliers are low. This leads to medium overall competitiveness and profitability, though individual brands may not be profitable. For bottling, threats of new entrance and bargaining power of buyers are high, making the industry less profitable with intense competitive pressures and lower margins. Key challenges facing these industries today include powerful retailers, health trends reducing sugar drink demand, and opportunities in new markets globally and for alternative beverages.
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft drink industry has historically
been favorable for positive profitability, as exemplified by Pepsi and Cokes financial outcomes.
Soft drink industry is very profitable, more so for the concentrate producers than the bottler\'s.
This is surprising considering the fact that product sold is a commodity which can even be
produced easily. There are several reasons for this, using the five forces analysis we can clearly
demonstrate how each force contributes the profitability of the industry.
Threat of new entrants
Entering bottling, meanwhile, would require substantial capital investment, which would deter
entry.
although the CP industry is not very capital intensive, other barriers would prevent entry.
Through their DSD practices, these companies had intimate relationships with their retail
channels and would be able to defend their positions effectively through discounting or other
tactics.
It would be nearly impossible for either a new CP or a new bottler to enter the industry. New CPs
would need to overcome the tremendous marketing muscle and market presence of Coke, Pepsi,
and a few others, who had established brand names that were as much as a century old.
Companies that have a door to door distribution channel in place like snack companies could
choose to diversify into soda industry
Switching costs are low for consumers who risk very little by trying new brands or
Beverages
Barriers to entry are relatively high, though, with large advertising budgets and competitive
brand loyalty to big players like Coca-Cola and Pepsi
The drinks with high growth and high hype are non-carbonated beverages such as juice drinks,
sports drinks, tea-based drinks, dairy-based drinks, and especially bottled water
Bargaining power of buyers
through five principal channels: food stores, convenience and gas, fountain, vending, and mass
merchandisers (primary part of \"Other\" in \"Cola Wars…\" case)
Bottlers own a manufacturing and sales operation in an exclusive geographic territory, with
rights granted in perpetuity by the franchiser, subject to termination only in the event of default
by the bottler
1980 Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act preserved the right of CPs to grant exclusive
territories to their bottlers, giving less bargaining power to Bottler\'s buyers because there is no
alternative supplier
Bottlers are locked into contracts that grant CPs the right to set prices and other terms of sale
Bottlers are allowed to handle the non-cola brands of other Cps at their discretion
Bottlers are also given freedom in choosing whether or not to carry new beverages introduced by
the CPs but cannot carry directly competitive brands
Competition for brand shelf space in retail channels gives some bargaining power back to buyers
Threat of substitute products
Through the early 1960s, soft drinks were synonymous with \"colas\" in the mind of consumers.
In the 1980s and 1990s Coffee, tea, water, juices.
56-bs.pptx
The document discusses the threat of substitutes and rivalry among existing competitors. It defines substitutes as alternative options that customers can purchase instead of a product. High threat of substitutes limits profitability and growth potential. Low threat of substitutes gives companies more control over the market. For Coca-Cola, major substitutes include Pepsi and other soft drinks. The document also discusses numerous competitors in the soft drink industry leading to intense price competition and low profitability due to high rivalry among Coca-Cola and Pepsi in particular.
Sse Cola Wars Group2
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has fewer competitors and lower profits due to saturation. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition through diversification and warns new strategies could draw customers away from smaller brands.
Sse colawars group3b_2011
This document summarizes the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi by discussing the concentrate and bottling industries. It notes that the concentrate industry is dominated by Coke and Pepsi due to their scale and brand building abilities, making it difficult for new entrants to gain market share. The bottling industry, in contrast, lacks a clear leader and sees slower growth due to higher entry costs and longer returns on investment. The document also compares the financial profiles of the concentrate and bottling industries, and discusses challenges facing the cola industry like health concerns, substitutes, and intense price competition.
Coca cola presentation
The document analyzes Coca Cola using various frameworks including PESTEL, Porter's Five Forces, and an industry analysis. Under PESTEL, it notes factors like developing economies, inflation, nutrition concerns, and environmental monitoring affect Coca Cola's business. The industry is very competitive with success dependent on pricing, distribution, marketing, and brand portfolio. Porter's Five Forces analyzes the threat of new entrants as low due to brand strength, and supplier power as low while buyer power and threats of substitution are high given alternatives.
Sse cola_wars_6a_2011
The document analyzes the competitive environment of the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds:
1) The threat of new entrants is high for concentrates due to low barriers but lower for bottlers due to capital requirements.
2) Rivalry is high in both industries as customers have many options.
3) Supplier power is low for concentrates but higher for bottlers who depend on concentrate producers.
4) The threat of substitutes is high given low switching costs and many alternative beverages.
5) Buyer power varies but is overall increasing with more information and retail consolidation.
Sse cola_wars_6a_2011
The document analyzes the competitive environment of the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that:
1) The threat of new entrants is high for concentrates due to low barriers to entry, but lower for bottlers which require more capital.
2) Rivalry is high in both industries as many competitors battle for market share.
3) Supplier power is low for concentrates which have multiple suppliers, but higher for bottlers dependent on concentrate brands.
4) The threat of substitutes is high given many alternative beverages and new consumption methods.
5) Buyer power varies but is overall increasing with more retail and consumer options.
Pepsi
This document analyzes Pepsi's strategy in the carbonated soft drink market. It was prepared by five students for a management class project. The document first provides an overview of the carbonated soft drink industry, noting that it is an oligopoly dominated by Pepsi and Coke. It then examines the five forces affecting the industry - threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, availability of substitutes, and rivalry. Next, it analyzes Pepsi's pricing strategies, including direct and indirect price discrimination. Finally, it briefly discusses opportunities for Pepsi to provide complements to its products through cooperation with Frito-Lay and with Coke.
Pepsi
This document provides a summary of Pepsi's strategy in the carbonated soft drink market. It analyzes the industry forces, including the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, availability of substitutes, and rivalry between existing competitors. It discusses Pepsi's pricing strategies, opportunities for developing complements, efforts at product differentiation, and potential areas for cooperation with chief rival Coca-Cola. The document recommends that Pepsi focus on developing complements through its Frito Lay and Quaker brands, make a bigger push in the fountain drink segment, and jointly with Coke de-escalate new product introductions and advertising attacks in developing overseas markets.
oligopoly in cola industry
This document summarizes an oligopoly market structure in the carbonated soft drink industry dominated by Pepsi and Coca-Cola. Some key points:
- Pepsi and Coca-Cola control 72% of the $105 billion US carbonated soft drink market.
- They are interdependent and monitor each other's pricing and actions closely due to being substitutes.
- They engage in non-price competition like advertising to differentiate their brands and boost sales.
- High barriers to entry exist for other firms due to economies of scale, brand recognition, and distribution channels of the incumbents.
IMPACT OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ON SOFT DRINKS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO BRA...
The document discusses trends in the soft drink industry, including changing consumer preferences towards healthier options. It outlines challenges like increasing retailer power, fierce competition, and safety regulations. Celebrity endorsements can help soft drink brands like Coca-Cola maintain sales and market share as consumer tastes evolve and industry dynamics shift. The document provides an overview of the soft drink market and examines how companies can drive growth through revenue protection, cost reduction, improved efficiency, and regulatory compliance.
Final_Case_Study
Comet Soda is launching a new sports drink called Hyper-Light. To maximize its success, Comet Soda should focus on key customer segments and ensure Hyper-Light has a unique value proposition. Comet Soda also needs to capture 12.5% of the electrolyte drink market to break even. To achieve this, Comet Soda will need aggressive marketing campaigns, celebrity endorsements, and guaranteed distribution channels to drive awareness and sales in the initial launch markets.
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
The document analyzes the soft drink concentrate producers industry and bottlers industry using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producers industry experiences high profitability due to industry concentration among Coke and Pepsi, strong brand awareness and identity, and low threat of substitutes. In contrast, the bottlers industry has high fragmentation, price wars due to customer bargaining power, and extremely low profitability. Overall, the concentrate producers industry is seen as more attractive due to the extreme differences in profitability and higher entry barriers compared to the bottlers industry.
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
The document analyzes the soft drink concentrate producers industry and bottlers industry using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producers industry experiences high profitability due to industry concentration among Coke and Pepsi, strong brand awareness and identity, and low threat of substitutes. In contrast, the bottlers industry has high fragmentation, price wars due to customer bargaining power, and extremely low profitability. Overall, the concentrate producers industry is seen as more attractive due to the extreme differences in profitability and higher entry barriers compared to the bottlers industry.
Michael porters’s 5 forces
Michael Porter's 5 Forces model identifies 5 competitive forces that shape every industry: (1) the threat of new entrants, (2) the power of suppliers, (3) the power of buyers, (4) the threat of substitutes, and (5) competitive rivalry. The document provides an overview of each force and examples of factors that determine the level of competition from each. It then analyzes the beverage industry specifically using Porter's 5 Forces framework.
Similar to Sse cola wars_group#4a_2011 (20)
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
IMPACT OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ON SOFT DRINKS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO BRA...
IMPACT OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ON SOFT DRINKS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO BRA...
Sse cola wars_group#4a_2011
- 1. Yu Cao Celine Delacour KaterynaGorokhova JustinasLegas Cola Wars Continue 1
- 3. Rivalry – Attractiveness of Market Relatively high bargaining power of suppliers Relatively high bargaining power buyers (Bottlers) High barriers to entry for new competitors Low switching costs for consumers, potentially high emotional costs for consumers to change drinking habits Two major players – Coca- Cola and Pepsi playing out each other but both are winning the war = Profitable and attractive for the concentrate industry 3
- 4. The Bottle Industry 4
- 5. Rivalry – Attractiveness of Market Relatively high bargaining power of suppliers Relatively low bargaining power buyers (retailers) High barriers to entry for new competitors due to established long-term contracts Relatively high switching costs due to investments Competitive industry (many players) = Low profitability, not attractive for the bottling industry 5
- 6. Comparison of Concentrate and Bottles The difference between profitability levels The concentrate producers control prices for product in both industries. The concentrate market has a low level of comptetion while bottling industry has a high level of competition. 6
- 7. FutureChallanges for Pepsi and Coca-Cola Higher health awareness among consumers – drink less CSD than other non-CSD alternatives Competition from vitamin water alternatives as a health conscious alternative for the consumers – Acquisitions needed. Needs for expanding the portfolio of brands even further, and reduce the production of the core products - cola drinks 7