1) The document summarizes a study on family businesses in Thailand. It analyzed 129 family businesses in 2545-2546 and 165 businesses in 2550 using quantitative and qualitative methods. 2) A family business model is proposed that examines the interactions between the family, ownership, and business axes over time. It identifies four common types of Thai family businesses. 3) Key success factors for family businesses are discussed, including corporate vision, high performance, team building, managerial skills, innovation, and personal attributes of family members.

1. 1
.
F F
- F
.
F
F
F F F F F F
F3 F (1) F F
F (2) F F
F FF (3) F
F F
(Mixed Model)
(Cross-Section
Study) F 2545 2550
F F F F
F F F F F
F F F F 294
F F F
F F 5 F F( ) F 0.923 F
(One-Way ANOVA) F F F F F
F 0.05 F F
F FF F F F (Meta-Content Analysis)
F F F F F

2. 2
F
1. F F 1)
F F 2) F F (High Performance) 3) F
4) F 5) F
6) F F
2. F F FF DNA F
F 4
F F
3. F F 4
F F 1 DNA F
F F 2 21 F 1)
2) F 3)
OEM Partner 4) F
F 3 - F 1) -
F 2) F 3) F F 4
F F 3 1 2 F
3 F
: F F

3. 3
F F F
F F
F F
F FF F F F F F F
F F F F
F F F F
F F F
(Family Business) F
F F F Ford Nike Sony Samsung F
F F F F F F F
F F F
F F F F F F
(1) F F F
Family Business Associates, United States Association for Small Business and Entre-
preneurship (USASBE), Family Firm Institute, Inc.(FFI), Family Owned Business Institute, Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)
(2) F The
Wharton School, Harvard Business School, ESE MBA (European School of Economics)
F F F SMEs F
F F F F F
(Family Conglomerates) F F F F F

4. 4
F F F F ( F , 2549) F
F F F F F F F F
(1) F F F
F
(2) F F F F F F F
F F F F F F F
F F F F
F
F
F F (Family Business: FB) FF F
SMEs F F F
F F Ward (2005) F F
F FF F
(Thai Family Business) F F
F F F F F F
F F (DNA) F (Key Success Factors)
(Family Business Model) (Business Succession)
F F F
F F F F F
F F F
F F F F3 F
(1) F F
F
(2) F F F FF

5. 5
(3) F F F
F F F 2 F F 1)
(Family Business Dynamics) F 1 F
( F F
F F ) 2 (
) 3
F (New Road Map) F (DMFB-Development Model of Family
Business F 21 F F F ) 2)
F F F F (
)
F F ( 1 . .2435- . .2481- F
2 . .2481- . .2500- 3 . .2500- . .2516- F F 4 . .2516- . .
2535- F 5 . .2535- . .2550- ) 3
F
( F F F F F F ) F
F FF ( F
F: F ) F F
F 1

6. 6
1:
F F F Ward (2005) F F F
F F F FF F
F F FF
F

7. 7
F F
F
1 FF F
F F
F F F F
F F
2 F
(DNA) F F
3 F F F
F F
F F
1) F
F6 F (1) F
F (2) F F (3) F (4) -
F (5) F (6) F
F
2) 2.1 F
F F 3 F F (Ownership Axis)
(Family Axis) (Business Axis)
3) 2.2 F
F F F
F 1 (The Do Phase) 2 F (The Lead to Do
Phase) 3 F (The Let Do Phase)

8. 8
F F
F F F
F F F F
(1) F F F
F F F
(2) F F
F FF F F F F
F F
F
(3) F
F F
F F F
F F F
F F FF F F
F F F
(Mixed Model) (Qualitative
Research) (Quantitative Research)
(Cross-Section Study) F 2545 2550
F F F F
F F F (Social Network
Analysis : SNA) F F F F (Homogeneous)
F F F 1 2545-2546 F 129 F 2 2550
165 F F 52 F MBA -
F 56 F F www.oknation.net
F F 53 F 4
294

9. 9
F F F 3 F F -
F
F F F F -
F F F F
F F F / F
F 6 F F F
F F (High Performance) F
F F F F (Personal
Attributes) 19 F F 5 F
F (Try-Out) F F F SMEs
F F 20 F
F( ) F 0.923
F F F F FF
F F F (Meta-Content Analysis) F F
F (Relevancy) F F F F (Concurrence)
F F F
F F F F 1990- 2008
F F F F
F F F F F 2
F
1. F F F F F
( ) F (S.D.) F (One-Way ANOVA) F
F F F F F F 0.05 F
F
1) F F (Corporate Vision) F F
F F

10. 10
(1) F F
F F
(2) F F F
F
(3) F F F F F
F F
2) F F (High Performance) F F
F
(1) F F
F F F F F F F F F FF F
F
(2) F F
F
(3) F F F F
F F F F
3) F (Team Building) F F F
F F F F F F F
(1) F F F F F
F F F F F
(2) F F F F F
F F F F
(3) F F F F F
F F F F
F F F F F
4) F (Managerial Skills) F
F F F
(1)

11. 11
(2) F F F F F F
F F F F F
(3) F
- F F
5) F (Innovation) F F
F
(1) F F
F F
(2) F F
F F F F
(3) F F
F F F
6) F F (Personal Attributes) F
F
(1) F F F
F F F F F F
(2) F F
F F F
6 F F F
F F F F F -
F F
F F

12. 12
2: F
2. F F FF F F
“DNA F F FF ”
DNA F F 4
1) (Family Axis) F F F
F F F F F F F
F F (Families’Life
Cycle) F 4 (1) F (2) F F (3) F
(4) F F F F
F 3
F F
F F (
F F )
FF F
F
FF F F F F F
F F F F

13. 13
2)
(Ownership Axis) F F
F F 3 (1) F (Controlling Owner) (2) F
F F (Sibling Partnership) (3) F (Cousin Consortium)
F F (Controlling
Owner) F FF (Founder) F FF
F F F F F F F
F F F F F F
F F (Sibling)
F F FF 3
FF F 1 F F F F F
F F F F F F F
3) (Business Axis) F
3 F
F F F F F
F F F F
F
F F F
F F F F
F F F F F F F
F
F F F F 2 F 3
F F F
F F F F F
4) F (Entrepreneur Axis)
F F3
F
1) (Make Money/Profit) F F
F F F F

14. 14
F
F
2) (Independence) F F F F F
F F F
F F F F
3) F (Freedom) F F F F
F F F F F F
(Ownership)
F
F F F F
FF F F
F F
1) F (Firm-Specific Knowledge)
F F F F F F
F
2) F F (Shared Social Network) F
F F F F F F F
F F
3) F (A Focus on the Long Run) F
FF F F F
4) F (Preservation of the Firm’s Reputa-
tion) F F F F F
F F F F
F F F
5) F FF (Reduced Cost of Control)
F F F F FF F F F
F

15. 15
F
F F F F F
F F F F (Carlock & Ward, 2001)
F F F
FF F F
(Capabilities) F F
(Carlock & Ward, 2001)
(Family Wealth)
F F F F
F F F (Financial Wealth)
F (Integrity) (Accomplishment)
F (Physical security, health and fitness) F
F (Knowledge, wisdom and spiritual growth)
(Family harmony) F (Individual happiness)
DNA F F
3 DNA F

16. 16
3. F F F
F F 4 F
F 1 DNA F
F 4 1) (Family Axis) 2)
F (Ownership Axis) 3) (Business Axis) 4) F (Entrepreneur
Axis) F F F 2
F 2 21 F F
F
1) (Cottage Industry)
F F F F F
F F
(Part Time)
2) F (Specialized Supplier
Family Business) F F
F F
F F F F F F
F F F
3) OEM Partner (OEM & Partner Family Business)
F F
F F F F F- F F
(Trading Firm) F OEM ( F F :
Original Equipment Manufacturing) F F (Partner) F
4) F (Conglomerate Family Business)
F 21 F
F (Conglomerate) F F 2
4.1 F (Superstar Firms) F
F
4.2 (Virtual Manufacturing)
F F F F (ODM) F
(OEM) F F F F F F -
F

17. 17
21 4
F 3 - (Social Culture Dimension)
F F F
F
1) F (Globalization) F
F (Local Firm) F F F F (Global Firm/Multi National Company)
F (Free Trade) F
(Monopoly based on Free Trade) ( F ,2549)
4 21

18. 18
5 -
2) F (Power Distance)
Hofstede (2005) F F ( F )
F (Power Distance) FF F
F F F F F F
3) F (Family’s Value System) F F
F F F F -
F F
F F F 3 F
F F (Personal Values) F
(1) F
(2)
(3) F
(4) F
(5) F
(6)
F (Value System) F
(1) F

19. 19
(2) F F F F
(3) F F F
(4) F
(5)
(6) F
(7) F
F (Thai Family Value System)
F
(1) F
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) F
(8)
(9) F F
F 5 6
F 4 F F (The Successor’s Phase Matrix)
F (Ownership)
FF F F F F F F F F
F F F FF F
F F F F F (The Successor’s Phase Matrix)
F 3 F F 4
F
F F F F
F F- F F F F F
F F F 10 30-40
F F F F
• F F
• F F

20. 20
• F F F F- F
F F
F3 F
1 (The ‘Do” Phase)
F F F F F F F 25-35 F
F F F
F FF F F F F F
F F F F
F F F F F
FF F
6 F
2 F (The “Lead to Do” Phase)
F F F F
F F 35-50 F F F
F F F F- F F
F - F
F F F F F F F F

21. 21
F- F F F F F F F
F F F F F F F
F (Family Council)
3 F (The “Let Do” Phase)
F F F 50-65 F FF F F- F F
F F F F F F
F F F F F F F F
F F F
F F F
F (Corporate Governance)
F F F
“ ” F F F F
F 3 F F (The
Successor’s Phase Matrix) F
7 F F

22. 22
F 4 F F 1 DNA F
F 2 21 F 3
- F 4 F F “ F
F
(The 4-D of Future Thai Family Business Prototype)” 8
8 F (The 4-D of Future Thai Family Business
Prototype)
F
F
1. F F -
F (Corporate Vision) F F F (High Performance) (Team
Building) (Managerial Skills) (Innovation) F

23. 23
(Personal Attributes) F F FF F
F www.oknation.net F F F F F
F F
F
2. F F F 4 F
F DNA F 4 1)
2) F 3) 4) F F
FF F F (Lon-
genecker, et al; 2006) F 2 21 F 1)
2) F 3)
OEM Partner 4) F 2
F Hoffman, et al.(1998) F F
F F F F F
F F
F F F
F F F F F -
F F F IT
F F F Li & Fung F
“Virtual Manufacturing” F F (Multi-Com-
pany) F 3 - F 1)
F F 2) F
(Power Distance) 3) F ABN-AMRO Private Banking (2006)
F F F F F
F F F F
Hofstede (2005) F F
F F (2549) F F F
F F 4 F
F F3 1 2 F
3 F Ward (2005) F F F F F
F F F F
F 4 1) 2)

24. 24
F 3) 4) F F
F F 3 F F F F F
3 F F F F
F Ramachan-
dran (ISB Hyderbad; . .2004) F F
F F (1)
F F F F F F F F -
(2) F F F F PEST( -
) (3) F F F F F
(Business Axis) F 1 F 2
F F F F F
2 F 3
4
F (Family Axis) F F F 1 FF 2
F F F F ( F ) F F F F
F
F F F 2 F 2 F
F F 3 4 F 3 F 4 F F 9

25. 25
9 F

26. 26
F
1. (2552). DNA . :
2. F (2549). F F . : .
3. ABN-AMRO Private Banking.(2006). The Family s Value System available
http://www.abnamroprivatebanking.com/asian_families_emotional_aspects_of_wealth_tr
ansfer_and_inheritance.pdf.
4. Carlock, S.R. & Ward, J.L. (2001). Strategic Planning for the Family Business. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Longenecker, et al.(2006). Small Business Management : An Entrepreneurial
Emphasis. China: South-Western Thomson Learning.
6. Kotter, J.P. & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York:
Free Press.
7. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the
Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Ward, J.L. (2005). Unconventional Wisdom. England: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Ramachandran, K. (2004). “Indian Family Businesses: Their Survival Beyond Three
Generation” India School of Business. avalilable http://www.isb.edu