How to Develop Mathematical Theorems Based on Literature Survey for PhD Thesi...PhD Assistance
The main aim of framing any theory is to explain, predict and understand occurrences. Theorem Development Literature Review is designed to hold or support a theory of any research.
A theory gives a complete and complex conceptual understanding of things which cannot be listed down like how societies work, how certain organization functions and why people interact in a particular way. Theories provide a Researcher with a different angle, from which they can look at complex problems and social issues, allow them to focus their attention on a different aspect of data and provide them with a framework within which they can conduct their analysis. All scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a recommended solution for an undiscovered occurrence which does not fit into a currently acknowledged scientific theory.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/2WPwuku
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
How to Develop Mathematical Theorems Based on Literature Survey for PhD Thesi...PhD Assistance
The main aim of framing any theory is to explain, predict and understand occurrences. Theorem Development Literature Review is designed to hold or support a theory of any research.
A theory gives a complete and complex conceptual understanding of things which cannot be listed down like how societies work, how certain organization functions and why people interact in a particular way. Theories provide a Researcher with a different angle, from which they can look at complex problems and social issues, allow them to focus their attention on a different aspect of data and provide them with a framework within which they can conduct their analysis. All scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a recommended solution for an undiscovered occurrence which does not fit into a currently acknowledged scientific theory.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/2WPwuku
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
How to Develop Mathematical Theorems Based on Literature Survey for PhD Thesi...PhD Assistance
The main aim of framing any theory is to explain, predict and understand occurrences. Theorem Development Literature Review is designed to hold or support a theory of any research.
A theory gives a complete and complex conceptual understanding of things which cannot be listed down like how societies work, how certain organization functions and why people interact in a particular way. Theories provide a Researcher with a different angle, from which they can look at complex problems and social issues, allow them to focus their attention on a different aspect of data and provide them with a framework within which they can conduct their analysis. All scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a recommended solution for an undiscovered occurrence which does not fit into a currently acknowledged scientific theory.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/2WPwuku
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
How to Develop Mathematical Theorems Based on Literature Survey for PhD Thesi...PhD Assistance
The main aim of framing any theory is to explain, predict and understand occurrences. Theorem Development Literature Review is designed to hold or support a theory of any research.
A theory gives a complete and complex conceptual understanding of things which cannot be listed down like how societies work, how certain organization functions and why people interact in a particular way. Theories provide a Researcher with a different angle, from which they can look at complex problems and social issues, allow them to focus their attention on a different aspect of data and provide them with a framework within which they can conduct their analysis. All scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a recommended solution for an undiscovered occurrence which does not fit into a currently acknowledged scientific theory.
Ph.D. Assistance:
Ph.D. Assistance serves as an external mentor to brainstorm your idea and translate that into research model. Hiring a mentor or tutor is common and therefore let your research committee known about the same. We do not offer any writing services without the involvement of the researcher.
Learn More: https://bit.ly/2WPwuku
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
,
theory
,
businessresearch methodstheory building
,
a ladder/steps of abstraction for concepts
,
scientific method
,
abstract level
,
deductive reasoning/logic
,
inductive reasoning
,
the scientific method: an overview
Research Paradigm/framework
Research Paradigm/ Framework
Described as the abstract, logical structure or meaning that guide the development of the study.
All frameworks are based on the identification of key concepts and the relationships among those concepts.
Concepts
Abstractly describes and names an object or phenomenon, thus providing it with a separate identity and meaning.
An intellectual representation of some aspects of reality that is derived from observations made from phenomena.
Conceptual Framework
Conceptual Framework
This consists of concepts that are placed within a logical and sequential design.
Represents less formal structure and used for studies in which existing theory is inapplicable or insufficient.
Based on specific concepts and propositions, derived from empirical observation and intuition.
May deduce theories from a conceptual framework.
Purposes of Conceptual Framework
To clarify concepts and propose relationships among the concepts in a study.
To provide a context for interpreting the study findings.
To explain observations
To encourage theory development that is useful to practice.
Theoretical Framework
Theoretical Framework
The theory provides a point of focus for attacking the unknown in a specific area.
If a relationship is found between two or more variables a theory should be formulated to explain why the relationship exists.
Theories are purposely created and formulated, never discovered; they can be tested but never proven.
Purposes of Theoretical Framework
To test theories
To make research findings meaningful and generalizable
To establish orderly connections between observations and facts.
To predict and control situations
To stimulate research
Theory building, What Is a Theory? , What Are the Goals of Theory?, Research Concepts, Constructs, Propositions, Variables, and Hypotheses, Research Concepts and Constructs, Research Propositions and Hypotheses, Understanding Theory, Verifying Theory, Theory Building, The Scientific Method
A research paradigm is “the set of common beliefs and agreements shared between scientist. about how problems should be understood and addressed” (Kuhn, 1970)
THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUALFRAMEWORK
FRAMEWORK
- defined by the dictionary, is a skeletal or structural framework.
THEORETICAL
- means relating to or having the characteristics of theory.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
- refers to the “set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables”.
KERLINGER THEORY (1973)
Theoretical framework indicates all the constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that relate to a research problem.
A conceptual framework is an analytical tool with several variations and contexts. It is used to make conceptual distinctions and organize ideas.
THREE (3) STYLES
STYLE NO. 1
Theoretical framework is presented in the first or introductory chapter (JOURNALISTIC STYLE).
STYLE NO. 2
It is another style and popularly found in other theses and dissertations.
STYLE NO. 3
The third style of presenting the theoretical framework is that which introduces it at about the end of chapter 2.
,
theory
,
businessresearch methodstheory building
,
a ladder/steps of abstraction for concepts
,
scientific method
,
abstract level
,
deductive reasoning/logic
,
inductive reasoning
,
the scientific method: an overview
Research Paradigm/framework
Research Paradigm/ Framework
Described as the abstract, logical structure or meaning that guide the development of the study.
All frameworks are based on the identification of key concepts and the relationships among those concepts.
Concepts
Abstractly describes and names an object or phenomenon, thus providing it with a separate identity and meaning.
An intellectual representation of some aspects of reality that is derived from observations made from phenomena.
Conceptual Framework
Conceptual Framework
This consists of concepts that are placed within a logical and sequential design.
Represents less formal structure and used for studies in which existing theory is inapplicable or insufficient.
Based on specific concepts and propositions, derived from empirical observation and intuition.
May deduce theories from a conceptual framework.
Purposes of Conceptual Framework
To clarify concepts and propose relationships among the concepts in a study.
To provide a context for interpreting the study findings.
To explain observations
To encourage theory development that is useful to practice.
Theoretical Framework
Theoretical Framework
The theory provides a point of focus for attacking the unknown in a specific area.
If a relationship is found between two or more variables a theory should be formulated to explain why the relationship exists.
Theories are purposely created and formulated, never discovered; they can be tested but never proven.
Purposes of Theoretical Framework
To test theories
To make research findings meaningful and generalizable
To establish orderly connections between observations and facts.
To predict and control situations
To stimulate research
Theory building, What Is a Theory? , What Are the Goals of Theory?, Research Concepts, Constructs, Propositions, Variables, and Hypotheses, Research Concepts and Constructs, Research Propositions and Hypotheses, Understanding Theory, Verifying Theory, Theory Building, The Scientific Method
A research paradigm is “the set of common beliefs and agreements shared between scientist. about how problems should be understood and addressed” (Kuhn, 1970)
THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUALFRAMEWORK
FRAMEWORK
- defined by the dictionary, is a skeletal or structural framework.
THEORETICAL
- means relating to or having the characteristics of theory.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
- refers to the “set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables”.
KERLINGER THEORY (1973)
Theoretical framework indicates all the constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that relate to a research problem.
A conceptual framework is an analytical tool with several variations and contexts. It is used to make conceptual distinctions and organize ideas.
THREE (3) STYLES
STYLE NO. 1
Theoretical framework is presented in the first or introductory chapter (JOURNALISTIC STYLE).
STYLE NO. 2
It is another style and popularly found in other theses and dissertations.
STYLE NO. 3
The third style of presenting the theoretical framework is that which introduces it at about the end of chapter 2.
Fash&Tech Bootcamp - 5-day acceleration program for early stage fashion-tech ...Fash&Tech
Fash&Tech Bootcamp is a unique opportunity brought to you by Eilat Hub and Fash&Tech. 7 selected startups will be provided with the opportunity to work with leading mentors from the fashion and technology industries in order to launch their venture in 5 days. Program finale is a pitching event where the startups will get exposure to relevant investors, media and industry leaders.
The bootcamp will take place on May 7-11 in Eilat, Israel. Apply here: https://goo.gl/x2j9rA
Ever wonder what exactly Fashion Tech is? Since we have yet to hear a great definition of the term and space, we've taken a stab at it. Fashion Tech is broader than most people think and is evolving at a breakneck speed, so we couldn't include ALL strata in the ecosystem in this one deck. Dive in and share with friends that are interested in the space, or someone that you think should know more about it.
Please feel free to add companies or innovations that you think belong under "fashion tech" in the comments.
Designing An Android Sensor Subsystem and Solving Common Sensor ProblemsJen Costillo
An application developer-focused introduction to the underlying sensor system design considerations and their impact on your Android application. Common problems discussed and solved.
Theory Development and EvaluationThe Science and Art of Theory D.docxsusannr
Theory Development and Evaluation
The Science and Art of Theory Development and Evaluation
Scholars in various disciplines have conducted research and developed various theories to explain different phenomena' existence or relationship. Hypotheses are created to fulfill a need and are always formed from observations, empirical studies, and literature review to produce a theory that explains a phenomenon, relationship of phenomena, or predicts the occurrence of phenomena. It is essential to evaluate a postulation before its application to test its correctness. Some theories, such as those in health sciences, are not applicable before testing and evaluation. It is only possible to determine a theory's effectiveness by testing after the predicted phenomenon occurs. However, evaluation is possible using scientific and artistic approaches.
The various criteria for evaluating theories are scope, logical consistency, parsimony, utility, testability, heurism, and test of time. Scope, utility, and logical consistency are arts of theory development and evaluation. A theory must be within the scope, which means somebody cannot develop a postulation beyond their purview. For instance, an expert in the medical field cannot create a political leadership theory because it is not within their purview. Logical consistency means that a hypothesis should be correct at all times. A postulation must not contain contradicting statements at different times. The utility is the art of testing the theory's usefulness and is evaluated based on its contribution to the field on which it is based (Fawcett, 2005). A postulation must bring a new aspect into the discipline. A hypothesis that repeats existing theories does not pass the test of utility.
Parsimony, testability, heurism, and test of time are scientific approaches to theory development and evaluation. Parsimony means that a theory should have a few concepts to be effective. A hypothesis with many arguments and ideas does not pass the parsimony test (Redmond, 2015). The science behind this is that the higher the number of concepts and arguments, the more difficult it is to produce a practical theory. Heurism refers to the ability of a hypothesis to create new thinking and stimulate new thoughts. A reasonable postulation must contribute to the discipline by bringing a unique aspect or thought to the field. Other researchers and theorists should be able to apply the theory or use the hypothesis as a basis for coming up with other postulations (Avant, 2009).
A good theory must pass testability and test of time. Testability means that its basis should be reliable evidence, and it should be possible for people to verify the evidence behind the theory. A theory can is not a statement without any backing of empirical research, literature review, or any other form of verifiable proof (Avant, 2009). The test of time means that a theory must be predictive and powerful. Predictability relates to the ability of the postu.
In this ppt Research and Theory explained in detail which covers Meaning of theory, Definition of Theory, Contribution of Research to Theory, Criteria of Theory, Theory and Facts, Role of Theory in Research, Uses of Theory in Research
Frameworks in Legal Research: Theoretical and ConceptualPreeti Sikder
Lesson Objective: After this lesson students will be able to -
a) comprehend the necessity of using frameworks while conducting legal research;
b) distinguish between theoretical and conceptual framework, and
c) use theoretical and conceptual frameworks within their research
Unit 7. Theoritical & Conceptual Framework.pptxshakirRahman10
THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS:
objectives:
1. Discuss the different types of models and frameworks used in research framework
2. Discuss the use of theoretical/conceptual frameworks and models in the research.
3. Differentiate theoretical/conceptual frameworks and models
4. Recognize the best suit theory or theoretical model/framework for particular research study
5. Develop conceptual models/framework, best suit for particular research study.
What is a theoretical framework?
A theoretical framework is a summary of the researcher’s theory regarding a particular problem that is developed through a review of previously tested knowledge of variables involved. It identifies a plan for investigation and interpretation of the findings.
It relates to philosophical basis on which the research takes place and form the link between the theoretical aspects and practical components of the investigation undertaken. Therefore it’’ has implications for every decision made in the research process".
Theoretical framework can be considered as a conceptual model that establishes a sense of structure that guides the research process. It includes the variables a researcher intends to measure and relationships he/she seeks to understand. Essentially, this is where a researcher develops a “theory” and build his/her case for investigating that theory.
The theoretical framework is the researcher’s presentation of a theory that explains a particular problem and it is not based on his/her suspicions alone.
Theoretical framework is presented in the early section of a dissertation mainly in chapter two of the report and provides the rationale for conducting your research to investigate a particular research problem.
It involves a well-supported rationale and is organized in a manner that helps the reader understand and asses the perspective of the researcher.
When developing a theoretical framework:
The researcher start by describing what is known about the variables involved, what is known about their relationship, and what can be explained thus far.
One need to investigate other researchers’ theories behind these relationships and identify a theory (or a combination of theories) that explain his/her major research problem.
The researcher need to consider alternative theories that might challenge his/her perspective.
One also considers the limitations associated with his/her theory and quite possibly that problem could be better understood by other theoretical frameworks.
Significance of a theoretical framework:
It helps the researcher to consider other possible frameworks and to reduce biases that may sway the researcher’s interpretation.
It clarifies researcher’s implicit theory in a manner that is more clearly defined.
It demonstrates that the relationships proposed by the researcher are not based on his/her personal instincts or guesses, but rather formed from facts obtained from authors of previous research.
Theoretical and Conceptual framework in ResearchIkbal Ahmed
A presentation on Theoretical framework and conceptual framework of a research.From this presentation you can know -
1) About theory and 4 types of theory
2) How to choose a suitable theoretical framework for your research
3) How to make a good conceptual framework for your research
4) Find out Independent variable and dependent variable of your problem statement
5) Relation between TF & CF relative to Quantitative and Qualitative methodology
Attending a job Interview for B1 and B2 Englsih learnersErika906060
It is a sample of an interview for a business english class for pre-intermediate and intermediate english students with emphasis on the speking ability.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airportmarketingjdass
Experience unparalleled EXTENDED STAY and comfort at Skye Residences located just minutes from Toronto Airport. Discover sophisticated accommodations tailored for discerning travelers.
Website Link :
https://skyeresidences.com/
https://skyeresidences.com/about-us/
https://skyeresidences.com/gallery/
https://skyeresidences.com/rooms/
https://skyeresidences.com/near-by-attractions/
https://skyeresidences.com/commute/
https://skyeresidences.com/contact/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-and-balcony/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-king-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
#Skye Residences Etobicoke, #Skye Residences Near Toronto Airport, #Skye Residences Toronto, #Skye Hotel Toronto, #Skye Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Near Toronto Airport Accommodation, #Suites Near Toronto Airport, #Etobicoke Suites Near Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Pearson International Airport, #Toronto Airport Suite Rentals, #Pearson Airport Hotel Suites
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdfseoforlegalpillers
It is crucial for the taxpayers to understand about the TDS Return Filing Due Date, so that they can fulfill your TDS obligations efficiently. Taxpayers can avoid penalties by sticking to the deadlines and by accurate filing of TDS. Timely filing of TDS will make sure about the availability of tax credits. You can also seek the professional guidance of experts like Legal Pillers for timely filing of the TDS Return.
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to ma...Lviv Startup Club
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to make small projects with small budgets profitable for the company (UA)
Kyiv PMDay 2024 Summer
Website – www.pmday.org
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/startuplviv
FB – https://www.facebook.com/pmdayconference
6. To summarize thus far What and How describe: only Why explains, What and How, provide a framework for interpreting patterns, or discrepancies, in our empirical observations. This is an important distinction because data, Whether qualitative or quantitative, Characterize: theory supplies the explanation for the characteristics. Therefore, We must make sure that what is passing as good theory includes a plausible, cogent explanation for why we should expect certain relationships in our data. Together these three elements provide the essential ingredients of a simple theory. description and explanation. 總結 : What 和 How 描述: Why 用於 解釋, What 和 How 在實證觀察提供解釋模式,或差異的框架。這是一個重要的區別。因此,確保什麼是好的理論, 需要 包括一個合理的 、 有說服力的解釋 及 為什麼我們應該期望在我們的某些數據關係。這三個要素結合起來,提供一個簡單的理論的基本要素 , 說明和解釋。
7. An additional comment about the use of propositions is in order. Not all bona fide theoretical contributions require propositions, and all papers need not follow the same format. However, when the purpose of a paper is to present a new theoretical position or to call into question the fundamental structure of an existing theory, researchable propositions are very useful. They force the author to think about the concrete applications of new or revised thinking, and they increase the likelihood that subsequent research will constitute valid tests of the author’s core arguments. If propositions are used, they should be limited to specifying the logically deduced implications for research of a theoretical argument. (Some authors mistakenly use propositions to summarize a body of literature.) 並非所有真正的理論貢獻 都 要求命題, 論 文不必遵循相同的格式。然而,當 論 文的目的是提出新的理論,或質疑現有理論的基本結構, 提出 可研究的命題是非常有用的。 Sensitivity to Context is especially important for theories based on experience. According to the contextualist perspective (Gergen, 1982), meaning is derived from context. That is, we understand what is going on by appreciating where and when it is happening. Observations are embedded and must be understood within a context. Therefore, authors of inductively generated theories have a particular responsibility for discussing limits of generalizability. 建構在 經驗 的 基礎理論 論文對 上下文的敏感性是特別重要的。我們 必須清楚的知道 怎麼欣賞 論文 的地方
8. Most Organizational scholars are not going to generate a new theory from scratch, Instead, they generally work on improving what already exists. In that context, it is often difficult to judge What constitutes enough of a contribution to warrant publication in a theory journal like AMR. Nevertheless, the constituent elements of social theories described in the preceding section Suggest a set of criteria for making editorial judgments. 大多數組織的學者都不會從頭 提出 一個新的理論,相反 的 ,他們 所從事的在於對 已經存在一般 的理論提出 改進。在這種情況下,往往很難判斷什麼構成了 什麼有價值的 貢獻。 One way to demonstrate the value of a proposed change in a list of factors is identify how this change affects the accepted relationships between the variables(Hows). Just as a list of variables does not constitute a theory, so the addition of a new variable to an existing list should not be mistaken as a theoretical contribution. Relationships, not lists, are the domain of theory. As Poincare(1983) so aptly noted, “Science is facts, just as houses are made of stone, . . But a pile of stones not a house, and a collection or facts is not necessarily science.” Therefore, theoretical insights come from demonstrating how the addition of a new variable significantly, alters our understanding of the phenomena by reorganizing our causal maps. For example, the addition of “growth-need strength” to job-design theories transformed extant views and altered research practice(Hackman & Lawler,1971). 建議在多種因素清單的變化 下 ,展示價值的方法之一是確定這 些 變化是如何影響 被 接受的變 數 ( Hows )之間的關係。正如一個變 數 列表,並不構成理論,因此, 將 一個新的變 數放入 現有列表 中 不應被視為一個理論貢獻。 Poincare(1983) 便指出,“科學是事實,就像房子是石頭 所組成 。但一堆石頭不是房子,和一個集合或事實不一定是科學。”
9. Who, When, Where. Generally, it is insufficient to point out limitations in current Conceptions of a theory’s range of application. Who, When, Where 一般來說,在目前概念理論應用範圍的限制是不夠的 Conversely, applying an old model to a new setting and showing that it works as expected is not instructive by itself. This conclusion has theoretical merit only if something about the new setting suggests the theory shouldn’t work under those conditions. 相反 地 ,舊模式應用到一個新的設置,並顯示出它的工作原理如預期的本身的啟發。這一結論具有理論價值
10. Three broad themes underlie this section. First, proposed improvements addressing only a single element of an existing theory are seldom judged to be sufficient. Therefore, a general rule of thumb is that critiques should focus on multiple elements of the theory. This approach adds the qualities of completeness and thoroughness to theoretical work. Second, theoretical critiques should marshal compelling evidence. This evidence can be logical(e.q., the theory is not internally consistent), empirical(its predictions are inconsistent with the data accumulated from several studies), or epistemological(its assumptions are invalid.-given information from another field). Third, in general, theoretical critiques should propose remedies or alternatives. Although we can think of classic critiques in the history of science that stood on their own merits, the typical debate in our field is less clear cut. Consequently, critics should share responsibility for crafting improved conceptualizations. Otherwise, it is difficult to know whether the original is indeed inferior, or simply the best we can do in a very complex world. 三大主題 : 一、 只 提出 解決現有理論的單一元素的改善建議,很少 被 判斷 是 足夠 的 。因此,一般的經驗法則是, 批判者 應著眼於理論的多個元素。這種方法增加了理論工作的完整性和徹底的素質。 二 、 理論批評應該 提出 令人信服的證據。這方面的證據,可以 是 邏輯 、 經驗或認識論 。 三 、 一般來說,理論批評 要 提出補救措施或替代方案。批 判 者應該分享具特色改善概念化的責任。否則,就很難知道是否原來確實是 缺陷 ,或只是在一個非常複雜的的世界中最好的
11. What Factors Are Considered in judging Conceptual Papers? l. What’s new? Does the paper make a significant, value-added contribution to current thinking. Reviewers are not necessarily looking for totally new theories. However, modifications or extensions of current theories should alter scholars’ extant views in important ways. Proposed changes can be calibrated in terms of scope and degree. Scope tends to reflect the level of theorizing(general versus middle level), while degree reflects the radicalness of the proposal. In general, scope (how much of the field is impacted) is less important in determining the merits of a contribution than is degree(how different is this from current thinking). 判斷概念性論文需具備哪些因素可從以下 七個關鍵問題 來看: 1. 有什麼新 的 ?是否作出顯著,增值的貢獻。 2.So what? Will the theory likely change the practice of organizational science in this area? Are linkages to research evident(either explicitly laid out, or easily, reliably deduced). Does the paper go beyond making token statements about the value of testing or using these ideas? Are solutions proposed for remedying alleged deficiencies in current theories? These questions are less appropriate for the rare, highly conceptual papers aimed at changing the way organizational scholars think, in general. However, the purpose of the standard theoretical paper should be to alter research practice, not simply to tweak a conceptual model in ways that are of little consequence. 2. 那有怎樣 ?可能改變這一領域的組織科學的實踐?該 論 文是否超越有關的測試或使用這些想法的價值?標準的理論文章應該是改變的研究實踐, 而 不是簡單地調整一個無關緊要的概念模型。
12. 3. Why so? Are the underlying logic and supporting evidence compelling? Are the author’s assumptions explicit? Are the author’s views believable? Theory development papers should be built on a foundation of convincing argumentation and grounded in reasonable, explicit views of human nature and organizational practice. 3. 為什麼會這樣?背後的邏輯和支持的證據令人信服嗎?作者的假設是否明確?作者的觀點是否可信?理論發展的論文應建立 在 一個令人信服 、 合理 、 人性化和組織實踐 具 明確意見的基礎上。 4. Well done? Does the paper reflect seasoned thinking, conveying completeness and thoroughness? Are multiple theoretical elements (What, How, Why, When-Where-Who) covered, giving the paper a conceptually well-rounded, rather than a superficial, qualify? Do the arguments reflect a broad, current under. standing of the subject? If propositions are included, are they used properly? Does the argument have any glaring logical flaws? Does it appear that the author has developed these thoughts over an extended period of time, in formed by extensive peer input? 4. 做的很 好 了嗎 ?該 論 文反映了經驗豐富的想 法 ,傳達的完整性和徹底? 有 多個理論要素(什麼,如何,為什麼,何時,在哪裡誰)覆蓋,而不是膚淺的?
13. 5. Done well? Is the paper well written? Does it flow logically? Are the central ideas easily accessed? Is it enjoyable to read? Is the paper long enough to cover the subject but short enough to be interesting? Does the paper’s appearance reflect high professional standards? Are the paper’s format and Content consistent with the specifications in the Notice to Contributor? 6. Why now? Is this topic of contemporary interest to scholars in this area? Will it likely advance current discussions, stimulate new discussions, or revitalize old discussions? Reviewers give low marks to papers they perceive are redundant, unconnected, or antiquated. 5. 做得 令人滿意嗎 ?是寫得很好的 論 文?它 是否符合 邏輯?中心思想是否 容易取用 ?是愉快的閱讀? 內文 足夠長的時間討論該問題,但 如果 短,很有趣嗎?紙張的外觀是否反映了較高的專業水平?論文的格式和內容與在通知中所提供的規格一致嗎? 6. 為什麼是現在?這是 否為 當代這方面學者關心的話題?它目前的討論有可能 加速 刺激新的討論,或振興 舊有的 討論?審稿人給予論文 評價低 , 原因是 他們認為 內容 是多餘的,無關的,或過時。
14. 7. Who cares? What percentage of academic readers are interested in this topic? A paper may be technically adequate but inherently uninteresting to most of our broad audience. Papers written on topics with narrow appeal are typically held to higher standard for criteria 1 and 2, that is, they are expected to make a more significant contribution to current thinking and research practice. In general, even highly specialized papers should be linked to core management or organizational concepts and problems. Otherwise, they are more appropriate for a discipline-based journal. 7. 誰在乎呢?在這個主題有興趣的學術讀者中有多少百分比?一 篇論 文,可能在技術上足夠,但本質上 對 廣大 讀者是 無趣 的 。吸引力 較低 的論文主題通常 被 以更高的標準為標準 (如: 1 和 2 ) ,也就是說,它們有望使當前的想 法 和實踐研究 有 更顯著的貢獻 In conclusion, the theory development process and criteria for judging theoretical contributions need to be broadly understood and accepted so that editors and contributors can communicate effectively. Hopefully, this brief article will facilitate that process. I urge readers to assist in the further development of frameworks for describing and enhancing these important scholarly activities. Papers on the process of building new and improving current theories are always welcome. 總之,理論的發展過程和理論貢獻的判斷標準需要得到廣泛的理解和接受,可以使編輯和貢獻者有效的溝通。