The spiral model is a software development process that combines elements of both design and prototyping-centric models. It involves iterating through four phases - planning, risk analysis, engineering, and evaluation - with each iteration intended to incrementally approach completion of the project. The spiral model aims to reduce risk at each phase by gathering user feedback and requirements and addressing risks before proceeding. It is suited for large, complex projects where requirements are not fully known. An example is a project creating a video mail system for illiterate users through iterative user testing and feedback.
Spiral Model is one of the classical SDLCs practiced around the world. Heavily advantageous for projects in catering for needs in the long run bound to change through out the time, Spiral model has been one of those theoretically taught for different course modules in IT and Computer Science.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
A Water Fall Model is easy to flow.
It can be implemented for any size of project.
Every stage has to be done separately at the right time so you cannot jump stages.
Documentation is produced at every stage of a waterfall model allowing people to understand what has been done.
Testing is done at every stage.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This approach carries less risk than a traditional Waterfall approach but is still far more risky and less efficient than a more Agile approaches.
In Iterative model, iterative process starts with a simple implementation of a small set of the software requirements and iteratively enhances the evolving versions until the complete system is implemented and ready to be deployed.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
The first formal description of the waterfall model is often cited as a 1970 article by Winston W. Royce
Royce did not use the term "waterfall" in this article.
Royce presented this model as an example of a flawed, non-working model.
Spiral Model is one of the classical SDLCs practiced around the world. Heavily advantageous for projects in catering for needs in the long run bound to change through out the time, Spiral model has been one of those theoretically taught for different course modules in IT and Computer Science.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
A Water Fall Model is easy to flow.
It can be implemented for any size of project.
Every stage has to be done separately at the right time so you cannot jump stages.
Documentation is produced at every stage of a waterfall model allowing people to understand what has been done.
Testing is done at every stage.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with an eye toward the end goal of the project.
This approach carries less risk than a traditional Waterfall approach but is still far more risky and less efficient than a more Agile approaches.
In Iterative model, iterative process starts with a simple implementation of a small set of the software requirements and iteratively enhances the evolving versions until the complete system is implemented and ready to be deployed.
Iterative model.
Spiral model
RAD(Rapid application development)
model.
The first formal description of the waterfall model is often cited as a 1970 article by Winston W. Royce
Royce did not use the term "waterfall" in this article.
Royce presented this model as an example of a flawed, non-working model.
Learn how and what is Spiral Model. This was made during 3RD Year. From Eastern Visayas State University - Main Campus, Tacloban City, Leyte, Philippines
CREATED BY:
Aguilar, Fatima Joy
Arpon, Benedict Julius Steven
Waterfall Model PPT in Software EngineeringRaju Sheoran
What is Waterfall Model? History of waterfall model, Advantages, Disadvantages and much more realted to waterfall model.
The waterfall model is the basic and simple software development life cycle model. But idealistic. Earlier the waterfall model was very popular but these days it is not used while software development. And the model was divided into phases and all the phases are organized in linear order. This model was first introduced by Dr. Winston in 1970.
This model is very popular and very important because all the models in software development life cycle models are based on it. So, we can call it, It is the base of all software development life cycle models or it is known as Classical Waterfall Model.
These PPT presentation help to understand waterfall model in SDLC. The Waterfall model is the earliest SDLC approach that was used for software development. There are five steps in the waterfall model.
Spiral Model in Software Engineering with Case StudySahil Bansal
The ppt describes the concept of Spiral Model and how it is beneficial in different scenarios. What are the challenges that Spiral Model prevents and where we can exhibit it to find the best possible result. The case study that utilizes the spiral model has been explained
Learn how and what is Spiral Model. This was made during 3RD Year. From Eastern Visayas State University - Main Campus, Tacloban City, Leyte, Philippines
CREATED BY:
Aguilar, Fatima Joy
Arpon, Benedict Julius Steven
Waterfall Model PPT in Software EngineeringRaju Sheoran
What is Waterfall Model? History of waterfall model, Advantages, Disadvantages and much more realted to waterfall model.
The waterfall model is the basic and simple software development life cycle model. But idealistic. Earlier the waterfall model was very popular but these days it is not used while software development. And the model was divided into phases and all the phases are organized in linear order. This model was first introduced by Dr. Winston in 1970.
This model is very popular and very important because all the models in software development life cycle models are based on it. So, we can call it, It is the base of all software development life cycle models or it is known as Classical Waterfall Model.
These PPT presentation help to understand waterfall model in SDLC. The Waterfall model is the earliest SDLC approach that was used for software development. There are five steps in the waterfall model.
Spiral Model in Software Engineering with Case StudySahil Bansal
The ppt describes the concept of Spiral Model and how it is beneficial in different scenarios. What are the challenges that Spiral Model prevents and where we can exhibit it to find the best possible result. The case study that utilizes the spiral model has been explained
A Software System Development Life Cycle Model for Improved Students Communic...IJCSES Journal
Software engineering provides methodologies, concepts and practices, which are used for analyzing,designing, building and maintaining the information in a software industry. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model is an approach used in the software industry for the development of various size
projects: small scale projects, medium scale projects and large scale projects. A software project of any size is developed with the co-ordination of development team. It is therefore important to assign resources intelligently to the different phases of the software project by the project manager. This study proposes a
model for the spiral development process with the use of a simulator (Simphony.NET), which helps the project manager in determining how to increase the productivity of a software firm with the use of minimum resources (expert team members). This model increase the utilization of different development
processes by keeping all development team members busy all the time, which helps in decreasing idle and waste time.
The software development life cycle (SDLC) is a framework defining tasks performed at each step in the software development process. SDLC is a structure followed by a development team within the software organization. It consists of a detailed plan describing how to develop, maintain and replace specific software.
Comparing Various SDLC Models On The Basis Of Available MethodologyIJMER
There are various SDLC models widely accepted and employed for developing software.
SDLC models give a theoretical guide line regarding development of the software. Employing proper
SDLC allows the managers to regulate whole development strategy of the software. Each SDLC has its
advantages and disadvantages making it suitable for use under specific condition and constraints for
specified type of software only. We need to understand which SDLC would generate most successful
result when employed for software development. For this we need some method to compare SDLC
models. Various methods have been suggested which allows comparing SDLC models. Comparing SLDC
models is a complex task as there is no mathematical theorem or physical device available. The essence
of this paper is to analyse some methodologies that could result in successful comparison of the SDLC
models. For this we have studied various available tools, techniques and methodologies and have tried
to extract most simple, easy and highly understandable method for comparing SDLC models.
The presentation is guide for the New Project managers and Scrum Masters .It has been prepared considering the basics of Projects and Project Management upto the fine detailing of the Scrum Agile Framework.
Ofcourse the contents are the guiding material and not exhaustive in nature.The contents shall help the Scrum Masters & Project Managers to have deep understanding for the Scrum Framework and adopt in day to day practise in order to successfully deliver the project within the given constrains
Designing for Privacy in Amazon Web ServicesKrzysztofKkol1
Data privacy is one of the most critical issues that businesses face. This presentation shares insights on the principles and best practices for ensuring the resilience and security of your workload.
Drawing on a real-life project from the HR industry, the various challenges will be demonstrated: data protection, self-healing, business continuity, security, and transparency of data processing. This systematized approach allowed to create a secure AWS cloud infrastructure that not only met strict compliance rules but also exceeded the client's expectations.
Providing Globus Services to Users of JASMIN for Environmental Data AnalysisGlobus
JASMIN is the UK’s high-performance data analysis platform for environmental science, operated by STFC on behalf of the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). In addition to its role in hosting the CEDA Archive (NERC’s long-term repository for climate, atmospheric science & Earth observation data in the UK), JASMIN provides a collaborative platform to a community of around 2,000 scientists in the UK and beyond, providing nearly 400 environmental science projects with working space, compute resources and tools to facilitate their work. High-performance data transfer into and out of JASMIN has always been a key feature, with many scientists bringing model outputs from supercomputers elsewhere in the UK, to analyse against observational or other model data in the CEDA Archive. A growing number of JASMIN users are now realising the benefits of using the Globus service to provide reliable and efficient data movement and other tasks in this and other contexts. Further use cases involve long-distance (intercontinental) transfers to and from JASMIN, and collecting results from a mobile atmospheric radar system, pushing data to JASMIN via a lightweight Globus deployment. We provide details of how Globus fits into our current infrastructure, our experience of the recent migration to GCSv5.4, and of our interest in developing use of the wider ecosystem of Globus services for the benefit of our user community.
Multiple Your Crypto Portfolio with the Innovative Features of Advanced Crypt...Hivelance Technology
Cryptocurrency trading bots are computer programs designed to automate buying, selling, and managing cryptocurrency transactions. These bots utilize advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze market data, identify trading opportunities, and execute trades on behalf of their users. By automating the decision-making process, crypto trading bots can react to market changes faster than human traders
Hivelance, a leading provider of cryptocurrency trading bot development services, stands out as the premier choice for crypto traders and developers. Hivelance boasts a team of seasoned cryptocurrency experts and software engineers who deeply understand the crypto market and the latest trends in automated trading, Hivelance leverages the latest technologies and tools in the industry, including advanced AI and machine learning algorithms, to create highly efficient and adaptable crypto trading bots
Gamify Your Mind; The Secret Sauce to Delivering Success, Continuously Improv...Shahin Sheidaei
Games are powerful teaching tools, fostering hands-on engagement and fun. But they require careful consideration to succeed. Join me to explore factors in running and selecting games, ensuring they serve as effective teaching tools. Learn to maintain focus on learning objectives while playing, and how to measure the ROI of gaming in education. Discover strategies for pitching gaming to leadership. This session offers insights, tips, and examples for coaches, team leads, and enterprise leaders seeking to teach from simple to complex concepts.
Accelerate Enterprise Software Engineering with PlatformlessWSO2
Key takeaways:
Challenges of building platforms and the benefits of platformless.
Key principles of platformless, including API-first, cloud-native middleware, platform engineering, and developer experience.
How Choreo enables the platformless experience.
How key concepts like application architecture, domain-driven design, zero trust, and cell-based architecture are inherently a part of Choreo.
Demo of an end-to-end app built and deployed on Choreo.
Globus Compute wth IRI Workflows - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
As part of the DOE Integrated Research Infrastructure (IRI) program, NERSC at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and ALCF at Argonne National Lab are working closely with General Atomics on accelerating the computing requirements of the DIII-D experiment. As part of the work the team is investigating ways to speedup the time to solution for many different parts of the DIII-D workflow including how they run jobs on HPC systems. One of these routes is looking at Globus Compute as a way to replace the current method for managing tasks and we describe a brief proof of concept showing how Globus Compute could help to schedule jobs and be a tool to connect compute at different facilities.
top nidhi software solution freedownloadvrstrong314
This presentation emphasizes the importance of data security and legal compliance for Nidhi companies in India. It highlights how online Nidhi software solutions, like Vector Nidhi Software, offer advanced features tailored to these needs. Key aspects include encryption, access controls, and audit trails to ensure data security. The software complies with regulatory guidelines from the MCA and RBI and adheres to Nidhi Rules, 2014. With customizable, user-friendly interfaces and real-time features, these Nidhi software solutions enhance efficiency, support growth, and provide exceptional member services. The presentation concludes with contact information for further inquiries.
Listen to the keynote address and hear about the latest developments from Rachana Ananthakrishnan and Ian Foster who review the updates to the Globus Platform and Service, and the relevance of Globus to the scientific community as an automation platform to accelerate scientific discovery.
Field Employee Tracking System| MiTrack App| Best Employee Tracking Solution|...informapgpstrackings
Keep tabs on your field staff effortlessly with Informap Technology Centre LLC. Real-time tracking, task assignment, and smart features for efficient management. Request a live demo today!
For more details, visit us : https://informapuae.com/field-staff-tracking/
Paketo Buildpacks : la meilleure façon de construire des images OCI? DevopsDa...Anthony Dahanne
Les Buildpacks existent depuis plus de 10 ans ! D’abord, ils étaient utilisés pour détecter et construire une application avant de la déployer sur certains PaaS. Ensuite, nous avons pu créer des images Docker (OCI) avec leur dernière génération, les Cloud Native Buildpacks (CNCF en incubation). Sont-ils une bonne alternative au Dockerfile ? Que sont les buildpacks Paketo ? Quelles communautés les soutiennent et comment ?
Venez le découvrir lors de cette session ignite
How to Position Your Globus Data Portal for Success Ten Good PracticesGlobus
Science gateways allow science and engineering communities to access shared data, software, computing services, and instruments. Science gateways have gained a lot of traction in the last twenty years, as evidenced by projects such as the Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) and the Center of Excellence on Science Gateways (SGX3) in the US, The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and its platforms in Australia, and the projects around Virtual Research Environments in Europe. A few mature frameworks have evolved with their different strengths and foci and have been taken up by a larger community such as the Globus Data Portal, Hubzero, Tapis, and Galaxy. However, even when gateways are built on successful frameworks, they continue to face the challenges of ongoing maintenance costs and how to meet the ever-expanding needs of the community they serve with enhanced features. It is not uncommon that gateways with compelling use cases are nonetheless unable to get past the prototype phase and become a full production service, or if they do, they don't survive more than a couple of years. While there is no guaranteed pathway to success, it seems likely that for any gateway there is a need for a strong community and/or solid funding streams to create and sustain its success. With over twenty years of examples to draw from, this presentation goes into detail for ten factors common to successful and enduring gateways that effectively serve as best practices for any new or developing gateway.
We describe the deployment and use of Globus Compute for remote computation. This content is aimed at researchers who wish to compute on remote resources using a unified programming interface, as well as system administrators who will deploy and operate Globus Compute services on their research computing infrastructure.
Globus Connect Server Deep Dive - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
We explore the Globus Connect Server (GCS) architecture and experiment with advanced configuration options and use cases. This content is targeted at system administrators who are familiar with GCS and currently operate—or are planning to operate—broader deployments at their institution.
Unleash Unlimited Potential with One-Time Purchase
BoxLang is more than just a language; it's a community. By choosing a Visionary License, you're not just investing in your success, you're actively contributing to the ongoing development and support of BoxLang.
Why React Native as a Strategic Advantage for Startup Innovation.pdfayushiqss
Do you know that React Native is being increasingly adopted by startups as well as big companies in the mobile app development industry? Big names like Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest have already integrated this robust open-source framework.
In fact, according to a report by Statista, the number of React Native developers has been steadily increasing over the years, reaching an estimated 1.9 million by the end of 2024. This means that the demand for this framework in the job market has been growing making it a valuable skill.
But what makes React Native so popular for mobile application development? It offers excellent cross-platform capabilities among other benefits. This way, with React Native, developers can write code once and run it on both iOS and Android devices thus saving time and resources leading to shorter development cycles hence faster time-to-market for your app.
Let’s take the example of a startup, which wanted to release their app on both iOS and Android at once. Through the use of React Native they managed to create an app and bring it into the market within a very short period. This helped them gain an advantage over their competitors because they had access to a large user base who were able to generate revenue quickly for them.
Code reviews are vital for ensuring good code quality. They serve as one of our last lines of defense against bugs and subpar code reaching production.
Yet, they often turn into annoying tasks riddled with frustration, hostility, unclear feedback and lack of standards. How can we improve this crucial process?
In this session we will cover:
- The Art of Effective Code Reviews
- Streamlining the Review Process
- Elevating Reviews with Automated Tools
By the end of this presentation, you'll have the knowledge on how to organize and improve your code review proces
3. Introduction
The spiral model, also known as the spiral lifecycle model.
It is a systems development method (SDM) used in information technology
This model of development combines the features of the prototyping model
and the systems development life cycle (SDLC).
This model of development combines the features of the prototyping model
and the waterfall model.
4. Introduction
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development.
As originally envisioned, the iterations were typically 6 months to 2 years long.
Each phase starts with a design goal and ends with the client (who may be
internal) reviewing the progress thus far.
Analysis and engineering efforts are applied at each phase of the project, with
an eye toward the end goal of the project.
5. History Of Spiral model
• Defined by Barry Boehm in his 1986 article "A Spiral Model of Software
Development and Enhancement“
• In 1988 Boehm published a similar paper to a wider audience
Title Computer table of contents
archive
Volume 21 Issue 5, May
1988
Editor Bruce D. Shriver
Page# 61-72
Publication Date 1988-05-01 (yyyy-mm-dd)
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society
Press Los Alamitos, CA,
USA
6. WHAT IS SPIRAL MODEL?
The spiral model is similar to the incremental model, with more emphasis
placed on risk analysis.
The spiral model has four phases: Planning, Risk Analysis, Engineering
and Evaluation.
Software project repeatedly passes through these four phases in iterations
(called Spirals).
The baseline spiral, starting in the planning phase, requirements are
gathered and risk is assessed. Each subsequent spirals builds on the
baseline spiral.
7. Spiral model is meta model?
Spiral model is also called as meta-model because in a way it comprises of
other models of SDLC.
Both waterfall and prototype models are used in it.
Here we do software development systematically over the loops (adhering
to waterfall approach) and at the same time we make a prototype and show
it to user after completion of various phase (just in case of prototype
model).
This way we are able to reduce risks as well as follow systematic approach
8. PHASES OF SPIRAL MODEL
A spiral model has 4 phases described below:
Planning phase
Risk analysis phase
Engineering phase
Evaluation phase.
9. PLANING
Requirements are studied and gathered.
Feasibility study
Reviews and walkthroughs to streamline the requirements
Requirements understanding document
Finalized list of requirements.
The project is reviewed and a decision made whether
to continue with a further loop of the spiral.
If it is decided to continue, plans are drawn up for the next
phase of the project.
10. RISK ANALYSIS
Requirements are studied and brain storming sessions are
done to identify the potential risks
Once the risks are identified , risk mitigation strategy is
planned and finalized
Document which highlights all the risks and its mitigation
plans
11. ENGINEERING WORKS
Actual development and testing if the software takes place in
this phase
Code
Test cases and test results
Test summary report and defect report.
13. When to Use Spiral model?
When the project is large.
Where the software needs continuous risk evaluation.
Requirements are a bit complicated and require continuous
clarification.
Software requires significant changes.
Where enough time frame is their to get end user feedback.
Where releases are required to be frequent.
14. When to Use Spiral model?
When costs and risk evaluation is important.
For medium to high-risk projects.
Long-term project commitment unwise because of potential changes to
economic priorities.
New product line.
Users are unsure of their needs.
Requirements are complex.
Significant changes are expected (research and exploration).
15. Advantages
Development is fast
Larger projects / software are created and handled in a strategic way
Risk evaluation is proper.
Control towards all the phases of development.
More and more features are added in a systematic way.
Software is produced early.
Has room for customer feedback and the changes are implemented faster.
Risk reduction mechanisms are in place.
Supports iteration and reflects real-world practices –Systematic
approach
16. Disadvantages
Risk analysis is important phase so requires expert people.
Is not beneficial for smaller projects.
Spiral may go infinitely.
Documentation is more as it has intermediate phases.
Complex, relatively difficult to follow strictly.
Applicable only to large systems
It is costly for smaller projects.
17. Comparison
Spiral Model
Risk factors are considered.
The requirements are not
freeze.
works in loop.
costly as Risk factor is
covered.
Better communication
between developer and
customer.
Waterfall model
Risk factors are not
considered.
The requirements are freeze.
Is linear sequential model.
Not much costly.
Communication level is not
high
18. Comparison
Spiral Model
Number of phases is not
fixed.
Used when requirement is
not clear and needs
conformation
customer interaction
continuous to move
together.
Risk factor is considered
prototype model
Number of phases is fixed.
Requirement are clear but
complex.
Customer interaction needs till
the prototype is app.
Risk factor are not considered
19. Examples
o The US military had adopted the spiral model for its Future Combat
Systems program. The FCS project was cancelled after six years (2003–
2009), it had a two year iteration (spiral).
o In 2010 with the collaboration of Microsoft Research ,Bangalore, India and
University of Toronto Canada made a project with spiral model “Exploring
the Feasibility of Video Mail for Illiterate Users”
22. Conclusion
Each spiral can be termed as a loop and each loop is a separate
development process in a spiral model.
The four activities (Planning, Risk analysis, engineering and
evaluation) form the intermediary phases of a spiral model and
is repeated again for each loop.
This model is very good to use for larger projects where you
can develop and deliver smaller prototypes and can enhance it
to make the larger software.
The implementation of this model requires experienced
resources as risk analysis is a very integral part of this model
and risk analysis requires expertise and as a result this model
becomes costly.
24. References
o What is spiral model and when to use
o http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/spiral-model-what-is-sdlc-
spiral-model/
o Advantages and dis advantages
o http://www.technotrice.com/what-is-spiral-model-software-
engineering/
o http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=45801
o Introduction , history
o http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_model
o http://robincse.blogspot.com/2012/03/boehms-spiral-process-
model.html
o Example
o http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~ravin/papers
o Video mail system for illiterate users
Editor's Notes
Spiral ka urdu ma matlb ha bal khata hwaa ..
These early papers use the term "process model" to refer to the spiral model as well as to incremental, waterfall, prototyping, and other approaches. However, the spiral model's characteristic risk-driven blending of other process models' features is already present
R]isk-driven subsetting of the spiral model steps allows the model to accommodate any appropriate mixture of a specification-oriented, prototype-oriented, simulation-oriented, automatic transformation-oriented, or other approach to software development
The systems development life cycle (SDLC).
The FCS should have resulted in three consecutive prototypes (one prototype per spiral—every two years). It was cancelled in May 2009. The spiral model thus may suit small (up to $3 million) software applications and not a complicated ($3 billion) distributed, interoperable, system of systems.