Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric
Participation for MSN
Small Group Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the small group discussions (GDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of GDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The GD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the GDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. GDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly group discussion is worth a maximum of 50 points. Students must post a minimum of four times in each discussion. One of these posts must be a summary of learning for the week. The initial response to the discussion prompt must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. Each of the subsequent posts must occur on days following the initial response. The final posting deadline for all subsequent posts is by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. For week 8 only, subsequent posts must occur by the Saturday deadline-11:59 pm MT. If the student does not meet the Wednesday posting deadline for the initial posting, a late penalty is applied of 5 points. Not meeting the requirements for subsequent postings, either in number or deadline, will result in a loss of 5 points.
Group Discussion Responses
Small group discussions provide the opportunity for deep exploration and new knowledge discovery of course topics. This type of exploration requires synthesis of various sources of information. Responses in group discussions should be substantive, reflect the student’s personal position on the topic, thoroughly address the information being asked for by the prompt, and include insights based on others’ postings. Direct quotes in group discussions should be a rare occurrence. These are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under Scholarliness and/or Course Knowledge rubric categories.
MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21 Executive Track
MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21 Executive Track
MSN-ST Executive Track
Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric Guidelines
Point Values
Except.
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric PurposeThe purpose oDustiBuckner14
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
b. Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
I ...
DNP Discussion GuidelinesPurposeThe purpose of the gradeDustiBuckner14
DNP Discussion Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
Review the discussion criteria:Application of Course Knowledge
· The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
· The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
·
Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
·
Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or di ...
This is a graded discussion 50 points possibledue Jan 6.docxjuan1826
This is a graded discussion:
50 points possible
due
Jan 6, 2021
Week 1: Comparison of the DNP and PhD Roles in Nursing
Only in collaboration, can DNP and PhD scholars support the delivery of safe, cost efficient, evidence-based quality health care. Reflect upon the roles of the practice and research scholar to answer the following questions.
Compare
and
contrast
the
roles of the
practice (DNP)
and
research (PhD) scholar
.
How do these roles
complement one another in translating research into practice
?
How could these roles
add value in addressing a practice problem at your workplace
?
Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.)for complete discussion requirements.
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I.
Application of Course Knowledge
: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
• The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
• The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
• The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information .
This is a graded discussion 50 points possibledue Feb 14WeeGrazynaBroyles24
This is a graded discussion: 50 points possible
due Feb 14
Week 8: The Role of the DNP Scholar in Preparing for Change
No unread replies.11 reply.
Reflect on the need to improve outcomes in healthcare and consider the following.
· How might a large cadre of nursing practice and research scholars' impact change?
· How might the work of this cadre translate evidence to change practice?
· How might this cadre lead clinical innovation?
· In influencing improvement outcomes at your workplace, what strategies can you implement to inspire others to embrace change?
Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.) for complete discussion requirements.
*3Scholarly Sources , no OLDER than 5 years , in APAformat and with in-Text citation
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless ...
Purpose The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is t.docxwoodruffeloisa
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
· Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2 and 5) Weeks 2, 3, 5, 6,
· Examine broad theoretical concepts as foundational to advanced nursing practice roles. (PO 1 and 2) Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4
· Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1) Weeks 4, 5, 6
Due Date: Sunday, 11:59pm MT
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Saturday at 11:59pm MT.
Total Points Possible: 50
Requirements:
Discussion Criteria
1. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
2. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
· Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
·
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a su ...
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric PurposeThe purpose oDustiBuckner14
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
b. Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
I ...
DNP Discussion GuidelinesPurposeThe purpose of the gradeDustiBuckner14
DNP Discussion Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
Review the discussion criteria:Application of Course Knowledge
· The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
· The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
·
Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
·
Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or di ...
This is a graded discussion 50 points possibledue Jan 6.docxjuan1826
This is a graded discussion:
50 points possible
due
Jan 6, 2021
Week 1: Comparison of the DNP and PhD Roles in Nursing
Only in collaboration, can DNP and PhD scholars support the delivery of safe, cost efficient, evidence-based quality health care. Reflect upon the roles of the practice and research scholar to answer the following questions.
Compare
and
contrast
the
roles of the
practice (DNP)
and
research (PhD) scholar
.
How do these roles
complement one another in translating research into practice
?
How could these roles
add value in addressing a practice problem at your workplace
?
Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.)for complete discussion requirements.
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I.
Application of Course Knowledge
: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
• The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
• The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
• The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information .
This is a graded discussion 50 points possibledue Feb 14WeeGrazynaBroyles24
This is a graded discussion: 50 points possible
due Feb 14
Week 8: The Role of the DNP Scholar in Preparing for Change
No unread replies.11 reply.
Reflect on the need to improve outcomes in healthcare and consider the following.
· How might a large cadre of nursing practice and research scholars' impact change?
· How might the work of this cadre translate evidence to change practice?
· How might this cadre lead clinical innovation?
· In influencing improvement outcomes at your workplace, what strategies can you implement to inspire others to embrace change?
Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.) for complete discussion requirements.
*3Scholarly Sources , no OLDER than 5 years , in APAformat and with in-Text citation
DNP Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.
Discussion Criteria
I. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
II. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless ...
Purpose The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is t.docxwoodruffeloisa
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
· Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2 and 5) Weeks 2, 3, 5, 6,
· Examine broad theoretical concepts as foundational to advanced nursing practice roles. (PO 1 and 2) Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4
· Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1) Weeks 4, 5, 6
Due Date: Sunday, 11:59pm MT
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Saturday at 11:59pm MT.
Total Points Possible: 50
Requirements:
Discussion Criteria
1. Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
2. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
· Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
· Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
·
· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a su ...
The Forum includes several stepsIdentify a different re.docxkarisariddell
The Forum includes several steps:
Identify a "different" research problem that would be best studied using a non-probability sample.
Discuss why this research problem is best studied using a non-probability sample, and what type of non-probability sample you would likely use.
Find a peer-reviewed journal article (no more than five years old) related to that research problem.
Discuss the sampling strategy/process used in the article. What details are included, and what information regarding the sampling was ignored?
Instructions for all Forums:
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers throughout the learning week. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required. Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly. If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Points
Exemplary (100%)
Accomplished (85%)
Developing (75%)
Beginning (65%)
Not Participating (0%)
Comprehension of course materials
4
Initial post demonstrates rich comprehension of course materials. Detailed use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates clear comprehension of course materials. Use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates some comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class may be incorrect or incomplete. Post may include some opinion without evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class are not included. Post is opinion based without evaluated evidence.
No posting, post is off topic, post does not meet minimum criteria for demonstrating beginning level of comprehension. Post may be plagiarized, or use a high percentage of quotes that prevent demonstration of student’s comprehension.
Real world application of knowledge
2
Initial post demonstrates that the learner can creatively and uniquely apply the concepts and examples learned in class to a personal or professional experience from their life or to a current event.
Initial post demonstrates that the learner can apply the concepts and examples learned in class to a personal or professional experience from their life or to a current event.
Initial post does not clearly demonstrate that the learner can apply the concepts and examples learned in class. Unclear link between the c ...
The Week 3 Forum meets the following course objectivesUnderstand .docxalisoncarleen
The Week 3 Forum meets the following course objectives:
Understand the feminist perspective, masculinities, and contributions to social research.
In this discussion forum, students are required to provide a response to one of the following questions. Remember to include two references to the readings and to respond to two other posts.
1.
What is the double standard discussed in Andersen (Chapter 4)? How has the double standard changed over time? Reference the readings and respond to two other posts.
Or
2.
Compare and contrast the stories in Connell about Adam Singer and Tip Southern (Chapter 6). What do these stories tell us about masculinities in the U.S.?
Instructions:
Sociology lives when we engage it – we read about it, we discuss it, we debate it, we frame our research questions with it, we put it to the test of empiricism, and every once in a while we build it ourselves. Therefore, the success of this course depends on all of us thoroughly engaging it. One of the most important parts of the course will be the discussions and debates we participate in, in our Forum. These discussions need to be informed by thorough reading of the assigned texts.
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world, active presence. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers through rich responses to their posts. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required. Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly. If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Points
Ex
e
m
p
la
r
y (100%)
Acc
o
m
p
lished (85%)
Developing (75%)
Beginning (65%)
Not Participating (0%)
Comprehension of course materials
4
Initial post demonstrates rich comprehension of course materials. Detailed use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates clear comprehension of course materials. Use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not clearly demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class may be incorrect or incomplete. Post may include some opinion without evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class are not included. Post is opinion based without evaluated evidence.
No posting, post is off topic, post does not meet minimum criteria for demonstrating beginning level of comprehension. Post may be.
242019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIVAIDS.docxvickeryr87
2/4/2019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
https://oregonstate.instructure.com/courses/1708319/assignments/7429085?module_item_id=18423339 1/3
Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
Due Thursday by 11:59pm Points 30 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Assignment Rubric
Submit Assignment
Purpose
Critical analysis is a vital part of learning. The goal of this assignment is to help you practice
your skills in reading mainstream media articles and being able to critically evaluate it as a
source of information.
Instruc ons
Your analysis of the article should exhibit careful thought, logical reasoning and provide evidence for your
answers. Each post should be at least two well-developed paragraph (approximately 4-6 sentences each
minimum). Use correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
Identify an article released by the mainstream media to the general public that discusses HIV/AIDS.
Example of an article is Botswana HIV Aids Deaths Decline
(https://allafrica.com/stories/201810030288.html) .
1. Identify which levels of the SEM are being addressed
2. Identify which levels of the SEM not addressed
3. In what ways might this article lead to stigma and discrimination that places a person or group at risk of
contracting HIV/AIDS?
4. Provide a written opinion on the how this article positively, negatively, or even excludes information
that contributes to the stemming of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
Submission Details
Due: Thursday by 11:59 pm
Grading Criteria
Opinion based in logical reasoning and evidence: 4 points
Identified SEM levels (both addressed and not addressed): 2 points
Length of post approximately 4-6 sentences or more: 2 points
Spelling and grammar: 2 points
2/4/2019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
https://oregonstate.instructure.com/courses/1708319/assignments/7429085?module_item_id=18423339 2/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
8.0 pts
8.0 pts
4.0 pts
3.0 pts
Organization
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Writing shows high
degree of attention
to logic and
reasoning of points.
Unity clearly leads
the reader to the
conclusion and stirs
thought regarding
the topic.
6.0 pts
Above Average
Writing is coherent
and logically
organized with
transitions used
between ideas and
paragraphs to
create coherence.
Overall unity of
ideas is present.
4.0 pts
Adequate
Writing is coherent
and logically
organized. Some
points remain
misplaced and
stray from the topic.
Transitions evident
but not used
throughout essay.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Writing lacks
logical
organization.
It shows
some
coherence
but ideas
lack unity.
Serious
errors.
0.0 pts
No
Marks
Level of
Content
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Content indicates
synthesis of ideas,
in-depth analysis
and evidences
original thought and
support for the topic.
6.0 pts
Above Average
Content
indicates
original thinking
and develops
ideas with
sufficient and
firm evidence.
4.0 pts
Adequate
Content
indicates
thinking and
reasoning
app.
Using discussion forums to engage students in critical thinkingLearningandTeaching
As more teaching moves into the online space, students will need to not only communicate with each other but learn collaboratively. Discussion forums are the most widely used tool for building a conversation around curriculum topics.
In order to develop an ability to analyse and reflect, students need practice.These slides cover how to structure and facilitate online discussions which promote critical thinking, and understand the students’ experience of learning in this context.
The Catholic University of America Metropolitan School of .docxmattinsonjanel
The Catholic University of America
Metropolitan School of Professional Studies
Course Syllabus
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
Metropolitan School of Professional Studies
MBU 514 and MBU 315 Leadership Foundations
Fall 2015
Credits: 3
Classroom: Online
Dates: August 31, 2015 to December 14, 2015
Instructor:
Dr. Jacquie Hamp
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @drjacquie
Telephone: 202 215 8117 cell
Office Hours: By Appointment
Dr. Jacquie Hamp is an educator, coach and consultant with particular expertise in leadership development, organizational development and human resources development strategy. From 2006 to 2015 she held the position as the Senior Director of Leadership Development for Goodwill Industries International in Rockville, Maryland. Dr. Hamp was responsible for the design and execution of leadership development programs and activities for all levels of the 4 billion dollar social enterprise network of Goodwill Industries across 165 independent local agencies. Jacquie is also a part time Associate Professor at George Washington University teaching at the graduate level and she is an adjunct professor at Catholic University of America, teaching leadership theory in the Masters Program.
Jacquie has a Master of Science degree in Human Resources Development Administration from Barry University. She holds a Doctor of Education degree in Human and Organizational Learning from the Graduate School of Education and Human Development at George Washington University. Jacquie has received a certificate in Executive Coaching from Georgetown University, a certificate in the Practice of Teaching Leadership from Harvard University and holds the national certification of Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR).
Jacquie has been invited to speak at conferences in the United States and the United Kingdom on the topic of how women learn through transformative experiences and techniques for effective leadership development in the social enterprise sector. She is a member of the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the International Leadership Association (ILA). In 2011 Dr. Hamp was awarded the Strategic Alignment Award by the Human Resources Leadership Association of Washington DC for her work in the redesign of the Goodwill Industries International leadership programs in order to meet the strategic goals of the organization.
Course Description: Surveys, compares, and contrasts contemporary theories of leadership, providing students the opportunity to assess their own leadership competencies and how they fit in with models of leadership. Students also discuss current literature, media coverage, and case studies on leadership issues.
Instructional Methods This course is based on the following adult learning concepts:
1. Learning is done by the learners, who are encouraged to achieve the overall course objectives through individual learning styles that meet their personal learning needs. ...
- System ChangeDiscussion PromptDiscuss an example of howVannaJoy20
- System Change
Discussion Prompt
Discuss an example of how a nurse leader was successful in spearheading change within an organization, institution, or the government that impacted healthcare policy. What driving forces led to the nurse leader’s success? What obstacles were encountered and how were they addressed?
Expectations
Initial Post:
APA format with intext citations
Word count minimum of 250, not including references
References: 2 high-level scholarly references within the last 5 years in APA format.
Plagiarism free.
Turnitin receipt.
Page 1 of 6
BUSINESS LEADERSHIP AND HUMAN VALUES
Theme Commentary Assignments
Your performance as a leader – whether you are a president, team member, or parent – is largely
determined by the way you think and communicate about values. The Business Leadership and
Human Values (BLHV) seminar is an opportunity to refine and practice this essential leadership
skill. Each class member shares responsibility for creating rich, productive discourse about
leadership and values. By engaging in team conversations, participating in class activities, and
writing critical reflections on course themes you will develop your multimodal ability to think and
communicate by observing, listening, speaking, reading, and writing more rigorously and
imaginatively about values and ethical challenges.
Theme Commentary Assignments Overview
The Theme Commentary interprets and articulates your point of view about a BLHV theme or a
particular issue, content item, or perspective included or closely related to a theme. This
assignment requires thoughtful preparation to sort through a complex array of ideas, concepts,
data, expertise, and opinion involving multiple stakeholders and contested perspectives. You may
also need to investigate additional sources to develop and communicate your point of view. Since
communication about values includes both individual commentary or opinion and corporate or
collective statements of values and principles, it is equally important to exercise these abilities
individually and collaboratively. The Theme Commentary assignments therefore include two
deliverables:
1. One Individual Theme Commentary submitted in Week 3 of the course.
2. One Team Theme Commentary submitted in Week 8 of the course.
Learning Objectives
The Theme Commentaries are designed for you to work individually and as part of a team to
cultivate and demonstrate your expertise in all the BLHV learning objectives with a focus on
Learning Objective 2:
Think and communicate effectively about values.
The Theme Commentaries demonstrate your ability to absorb, critique, and synthesize a complex
discursive field ideas, facts, expertise, values, and opinions related to an ethically consequential
issue or topic and then construct a thoughtfully coherent, compelling narrative that persuasively
expresses a point of view based on clearly articulated ideas, evidence, a ...
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docxcravennichole326
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Smallpox has been widely reported as a possible bio-terror weapon..docxjennifer822
Smallpox has been widely reported as a possible bio-terror weapon.
Explain what you
know about the etiology of the disease.
Include what you know about the
current state of the world’s immunity to smallpox.
Discuss how
effective (or ineffective) a smallpox weapon might be.
Include what kind
of defense could be mounted against such an attack.
.
The Forum includes several stepsIdentify a different re.docxkarisariddell
The Forum includes several steps:
Identify a "different" research problem that would be best studied using a non-probability sample.
Discuss why this research problem is best studied using a non-probability sample, and what type of non-probability sample you would likely use.
Find a peer-reviewed journal article (no more than five years old) related to that research problem.
Discuss the sampling strategy/process used in the article. What details are included, and what information regarding the sampling was ignored?
Instructions for all Forums:
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers throughout the learning week. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required. Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly. If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Points
Exemplary (100%)
Accomplished (85%)
Developing (75%)
Beginning (65%)
Not Participating (0%)
Comprehension of course materials
4
Initial post demonstrates rich comprehension of course materials. Detailed use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates clear comprehension of course materials. Use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates some comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class may be incorrect or incomplete. Post may include some opinion without evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class are not included. Post is opinion based without evaluated evidence.
No posting, post is off topic, post does not meet minimum criteria for demonstrating beginning level of comprehension. Post may be plagiarized, or use a high percentage of quotes that prevent demonstration of student’s comprehension.
Real world application of knowledge
2
Initial post demonstrates that the learner can creatively and uniquely apply the concepts and examples learned in class to a personal or professional experience from their life or to a current event.
Initial post demonstrates that the learner can apply the concepts and examples learned in class to a personal or professional experience from their life or to a current event.
Initial post does not clearly demonstrate that the learner can apply the concepts and examples learned in class. Unclear link between the c ...
The Week 3 Forum meets the following course objectivesUnderstand .docxalisoncarleen
The Week 3 Forum meets the following course objectives:
Understand the feminist perspective, masculinities, and contributions to social research.
In this discussion forum, students are required to provide a response to one of the following questions. Remember to include two references to the readings and to respond to two other posts.
1.
What is the double standard discussed in Andersen (Chapter 4)? How has the double standard changed over time? Reference the readings and respond to two other posts.
Or
2.
Compare and contrast the stories in Connell about Adam Singer and Tip Southern (Chapter 6). What do these stories tell us about masculinities in the U.S.?
Instructions:
Sociology lives when we engage it – we read about it, we discuss it, we debate it, we frame our research questions with it, we put it to the test of empiricism, and every once in a while we build it ourselves. Therefore, the success of this course depends on all of us thoroughly engaging it. One of the most important parts of the course will be the discussions and debates we participate in, in our Forum. These discussions need to be informed by thorough reading of the assigned texts.
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world, active presence. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers through rich responses to their posts. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required. Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly. If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Points
Ex
e
m
p
la
r
y (100%)
Acc
o
m
p
lished (85%)
Developing (75%)
Beginning (65%)
Not Participating (0%)
Comprehension of course materials
4
Initial post demonstrates rich comprehension of course materials. Detailed use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post demonstrates clear comprehension of course materials. Use of terminology or examples learned in class. If post includes opinion, it is supported with evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not clearly demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class may be incorrect or incomplete. Post may include some opinion without evaluated evidence.
Initial post does not demonstrate comprehension of course materials. Specific terminology or examples learned in class are not included. Post is opinion based without evaluated evidence.
No posting, post is off topic, post does not meet minimum criteria for demonstrating beginning level of comprehension. Post may be.
242019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIVAIDS.docxvickeryr87
2/4/2019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
https://oregonstate.instructure.com/courses/1708319/assignments/7429085?module_item_id=18423339 1/3
Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
Due Thursday by 11:59pm Points 30 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Assignment Rubric
Submit Assignment
Purpose
Critical analysis is a vital part of learning. The goal of this assignment is to help you practice
your skills in reading mainstream media articles and being able to critically evaluate it as a
source of information.
Instruc ons
Your analysis of the article should exhibit careful thought, logical reasoning and provide evidence for your
answers. Each post should be at least two well-developed paragraph (approximately 4-6 sentences each
minimum). Use correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
Identify an article released by the mainstream media to the general public that discusses HIV/AIDS.
Example of an article is Botswana HIV Aids Deaths Decline
(https://allafrica.com/stories/201810030288.html) .
1. Identify which levels of the SEM are being addressed
2. Identify which levels of the SEM not addressed
3. In what ways might this article lead to stigma and discrimination that places a person or group at risk of
contracting HIV/AIDS?
4. Provide a written opinion on the how this article positively, negatively, or even excludes information
that contributes to the stemming of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
Submission Details
Due: Thursday by 11:59 pm
Grading Criteria
Opinion based in logical reasoning and evidence: 4 points
Identified SEM levels (both addressed and not addressed): 2 points
Length of post approximately 4-6 sentences or more: 2 points
Spelling and grammar: 2 points
2/4/2019 Assignment due Week 5 - Mainstream media and HIV/AIDS
https://oregonstate.instructure.com/courses/1708319/assignments/7429085?module_item_id=18423339 2/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
8.0 pts
8.0 pts
4.0 pts
3.0 pts
Organization
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Writing shows high
degree of attention
to logic and
reasoning of points.
Unity clearly leads
the reader to the
conclusion and stirs
thought regarding
the topic.
6.0 pts
Above Average
Writing is coherent
and logically
organized with
transitions used
between ideas and
paragraphs to
create coherence.
Overall unity of
ideas is present.
4.0 pts
Adequate
Writing is coherent
and logically
organized. Some
points remain
misplaced and
stray from the topic.
Transitions evident
but not used
throughout essay.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Writing lacks
logical
organization.
It shows
some
coherence
but ideas
lack unity.
Serious
errors.
0.0 pts
No
Marks
Level of
Content
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Content indicates
synthesis of ideas,
in-depth analysis
and evidences
original thought and
support for the topic.
6.0 pts
Above Average
Content
indicates
original thinking
and develops
ideas with
sufficient and
firm evidence.
4.0 pts
Adequate
Content
indicates
thinking and
reasoning
app.
Using discussion forums to engage students in critical thinkingLearningandTeaching
As more teaching moves into the online space, students will need to not only communicate with each other but learn collaboratively. Discussion forums are the most widely used tool for building a conversation around curriculum topics.
In order to develop an ability to analyse and reflect, students need practice.These slides cover how to structure and facilitate online discussions which promote critical thinking, and understand the students’ experience of learning in this context.
The Catholic University of America Metropolitan School of .docxmattinsonjanel
The Catholic University of America
Metropolitan School of Professional Studies
Course Syllabus
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
Metropolitan School of Professional Studies
MBU 514 and MBU 315 Leadership Foundations
Fall 2015
Credits: 3
Classroom: Online
Dates: August 31, 2015 to December 14, 2015
Instructor:
Dr. Jacquie Hamp
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @drjacquie
Telephone: 202 215 8117 cell
Office Hours: By Appointment
Dr. Jacquie Hamp is an educator, coach and consultant with particular expertise in leadership development, organizational development and human resources development strategy. From 2006 to 2015 she held the position as the Senior Director of Leadership Development for Goodwill Industries International in Rockville, Maryland. Dr. Hamp was responsible for the design and execution of leadership development programs and activities for all levels of the 4 billion dollar social enterprise network of Goodwill Industries across 165 independent local agencies. Jacquie is also a part time Associate Professor at George Washington University teaching at the graduate level and she is an adjunct professor at Catholic University of America, teaching leadership theory in the Masters Program.
Jacquie has a Master of Science degree in Human Resources Development Administration from Barry University. She holds a Doctor of Education degree in Human and Organizational Learning from the Graduate School of Education and Human Development at George Washington University. Jacquie has received a certificate in Executive Coaching from Georgetown University, a certificate in the Practice of Teaching Leadership from Harvard University and holds the national certification of Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR).
Jacquie has been invited to speak at conferences in the United States and the United Kingdom on the topic of how women learn through transformative experiences and techniques for effective leadership development in the social enterprise sector. She is a member of the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the International Leadership Association (ILA). In 2011 Dr. Hamp was awarded the Strategic Alignment Award by the Human Resources Leadership Association of Washington DC for her work in the redesign of the Goodwill Industries International leadership programs in order to meet the strategic goals of the organization.
Course Description: Surveys, compares, and contrasts contemporary theories of leadership, providing students the opportunity to assess their own leadership competencies and how they fit in with models of leadership. Students also discuss current literature, media coverage, and case studies on leadership issues.
Instructional Methods This course is based on the following adult learning concepts:
1. Learning is done by the learners, who are encouraged to achieve the overall course objectives through individual learning styles that meet their personal learning needs. ...
- System ChangeDiscussion PromptDiscuss an example of howVannaJoy20
- System Change
Discussion Prompt
Discuss an example of how a nurse leader was successful in spearheading change within an organization, institution, or the government that impacted healthcare policy. What driving forces led to the nurse leader’s success? What obstacles were encountered and how were they addressed?
Expectations
Initial Post:
APA format with intext citations
Word count minimum of 250, not including references
References: 2 high-level scholarly references within the last 5 years in APA format.
Plagiarism free.
Turnitin receipt.
Page 1 of 6
BUSINESS LEADERSHIP AND HUMAN VALUES
Theme Commentary Assignments
Your performance as a leader – whether you are a president, team member, or parent – is largely
determined by the way you think and communicate about values. The Business Leadership and
Human Values (BLHV) seminar is an opportunity to refine and practice this essential leadership
skill. Each class member shares responsibility for creating rich, productive discourse about
leadership and values. By engaging in team conversations, participating in class activities, and
writing critical reflections on course themes you will develop your multimodal ability to think and
communicate by observing, listening, speaking, reading, and writing more rigorously and
imaginatively about values and ethical challenges.
Theme Commentary Assignments Overview
The Theme Commentary interprets and articulates your point of view about a BLHV theme or a
particular issue, content item, or perspective included or closely related to a theme. This
assignment requires thoughtful preparation to sort through a complex array of ideas, concepts,
data, expertise, and opinion involving multiple stakeholders and contested perspectives. You may
also need to investigate additional sources to develop and communicate your point of view. Since
communication about values includes both individual commentary or opinion and corporate or
collective statements of values and principles, it is equally important to exercise these abilities
individually and collaboratively. The Theme Commentary assignments therefore include two
deliverables:
1. One Individual Theme Commentary submitted in Week 3 of the course.
2. One Team Theme Commentary submitted in Week 8 of the course.
Learning Objectives
The Theme Commentaries are designed for you to work individually and as part of a team to
cultivate and demonstrate your expertise in all the BLHV learning objectives with a focus on
Learning Objective 2:
Think and communicate effectively about values.
The Theme Commentaries demonstrate your ability to absorb, critique, and synthesize a complex
discursive field ideas, facts, expertise, values, and opinions related to an ethically consequential
issue or topic and then construct a thoughtfully coherent, compelling narrative that persuasively
expresses a point of view based on clearly articulated ideas, evidence, a ...
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docxcravennichole326
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Smallpox has been widely reported as a possible bio-terror weapon..docxjennifer822
Smallpox has been widely reported as a possible bio-terror weapon.
Explain what you
know about the etiology of the disease.
Include what you know about the
current state of the world’s immunity to smallpox.
Discuss how
effective (or ineffective) a smallpox weapon might be.
Include what kind
of defense could be mounted against such an attack.
.
Small mistakes are the steppingstones to large failures. How mig.docxjennifer822
Small mistakes are the steppingstones to large failures. How might this saying apply to this lesson, and do you agree?
In your responses, provide an example of a real-life seemingly small mistake with large consequences. By real-life, I mean a situation that actually happened, not a theoretical one.
.
SMALL GROUP LESSON 1
SMALL GROUP LESSON 2
Field Experience B: Small Group Lesson
Babita Mohabir
GCU
SEC 580
June 10, 2020
Small Group Lesson
I am highly satisfied with the lesson plan, particularly because it yielded the desired results proving that it was carefully crafted right from the beginning. My goal at the end of the lesson was to offer a good learning experience to the learners, and I achieved that. I was able to put into perspective all the factors which played a huge role in influencing the learning outcomes of the learners in the small group. I executed the lesson plan effectively. I engaged the learners and strengthened their understanding of the course content. By sharing the lesson plan with the learners through highlighting a visible agenda on the board about what they will be learning and doing during class time, I was able to keep them on track. I made a conscious effort to maintain eye contact in class, and this enhanced the involvement of the learners with the course content. I conveyed the content and instructions in a clear and specific manner so that the learners with poor listening comprehension were not left behind.
When attempting to put a point across in class, I ensured that my voice was loud enough and clear. This, coupled with the developed rules and regulations, enabled me to successfully maintain a degree of order and control in the class, and fully grasped the attention of the learners. Using relevant examples and analogies to demonstrate the mathematical concepts was successful as the learners were able to understand the topic more. I also succeeded in building a rapport with the learners thanks to the warm and friendly class atmosphere that I created. Additionally, I was successful in time management. I did not run out of time as all that I had planned to cover was completed within the stipulated timeline. Using a collaborative approach for teaching also succeeded in boosting involvement among all the learners. In regard to the improvements, apart from winding up the lesson by simply summarizing the main points learned, it would be a good idea to conclude by also previewing the next lesson. This means briefly striking a connection between the finished concept and the next coming concept. A combination of summarizing and previewing would spur the interest of the learners in the coming lesson and enable them to connect the various ideas within a much larger context.
The other improvement would have been establishing strategies to obtain learners’ feedback in order to gather insight into any shortcomings in my teaching technique. The lesson plan was effectively assessed since I had created several productive questions for each learning concept which I was to use to check for understa.
SM Nonprofit Ad Campaign Term Project InstructionsOverview.docxjennifer822
SM Nonprofit Ad Campaign Term Project Instructions
Overview
Marketing can inspire change, generate donations, and inform the public. However, nonprofits often lack the marketing prowess needed to reach consumers. You are tasked to create a marketing ad and social media campaign for a nonprofit you choose. Visit the nonprofit website to understand their purpose and align the ad campaign you create.
Choose one of the following charities on the website to build a social media ad campaign.
https://charity.lovetoknow.com/Top_100_Charities
The below items are to be turned in on Blackboard in a Word document. Each student is responsible for submitting their own unique work. Check SafeAssign at submission for plagiarism; unintentional plagiarism is still plagiarism.
Ad Content
1) Ad/image that can standalone (if posted on a social media platform in smartphone or desktop view). Ad should be unambiguously clear, easy to read within moments, and eye-catching. Content needs to be accurate, informative, and convincing to change behavior.
Include the name of the charity and method to connect with existing platforms.
Written responses describing the ad campaign
Written work: 2-3 pages, 1-inch margins 12-point Times New Roman/Arial font, double spaced. Be specific with details, use examples, and thoroughly explain your reasoning. The written work should articulate your knowledge about social media strategy, marketing mix, research measures, and other materials covered throughout this course. Demonstrate your understanding of course materials by writing about these topics.
2) Describe what is the content in the ad (e.g. Call to Action (CTA) hashtag, information guide, change behavior, draw clicks to website)? Be specific. Restating these examples is insufficient.
3) What is the name of the ad campaign? What is this social media ad campaign trying to do? Thoroughly explain your reasoning and be specific.
4) What is the method for releasing on social media (e.g. platform, timing, target market, length of campaign)? Elaborating and be specific with details.
5) What are the measures for success (e.g. how many likes/comments/shares)? State specific goals and figures that would indicate if the campaign was successful.
Sample Ads
Note: These are basic samples. The quality of work and attention to details should be greater. Expectations in the workplace are higher for employees creating marketing materials because businesses depend on generating revenue from these kinds of ads. In fact, these sample ads draw website visits. Notice what works and doesn’t work from the samples.
https://www.studentdigz.co.za/sharing-is-caring/
Graphic CPR ad example with moving pictures:
https://carrington.edu/blog/medical/how-to-perform-cpr/
https://www.cprcertified.com/how-to-perform-hands-only-cpr-infographic
https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-illustration-benefits-drinking-water-infographic-vector-illustration-image675702.
Small Business State of the UnionInterest and involvement in s.docxjennifer822
Small Business "State of the Union"
Interest and involvement in small business and entrepreneurial activities is an integral part of United States economy thorough both good and "challenging" times. To see how "things" are doing, your assignment is to research the today's climate of small business and its economic impact. Included in your submission could/should be information related to numbers of what "defines" a small business , employers and employees, job growth, current numbers of small businesses (which will vary dependent upon sources utilized), women-owned and minority-owned business statistics, as well as information related to business turnover (closures for whatever reasons). Other economic areas to explore include exporting activities tied to small business, federal and state procurement activities (selling to the government), innovation activities (and federal funds which may have been awarded to small businesses to assist with innovation), and federal and/or state sources of funding which may have been utilized.
Recommended resources for use on this assignment would be the U.S. Census data, Small Business Administration (SBA), Department of Labor (DOL), Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other reputable sites. Popular press information can also be utilized to supplement (e.g. Entrepreneur Magazine, INC. Magazine, Forbes, etc.)
Please utilize the most current year data available
in your narrative and provide a source document at the end of your work identifying the resources cited.
This paper should be 3-4 pages (not including source document) in length with a thorough discussion and explanation of the information provided. As always, your final thoughts regarding the findings are acceptable and appreciated.
.
Small Business and Forms of Business Ownershiphttpwww.wil.docxjennifer822
Small Business and Forms of Business Ownership
http://www.wileybusinessupdates.com
Chapter
5
1
Discuss why most businesses are small businesses.
Determine the contributions of small businesses to the economy.
Discuss why small businesses fail.
Identify the available assistance for small businesses.
1
Learning Objectives
Outline the forms of private business ownership.
Describe the public and collective ownership of business.
Discuss organizing a corporation.
Explain what happens when businesses join forces.
2
3
4
7
8
5
6
2
99.7% of all U.S. companies are considered small businesses.
These firms have generated 65% of new jobs in the past two decades
They employ half of all private sector workers
Most Businesses are Small Businesses
3
The Small Business Administrationdefines a small business to be a firm that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in the field.
Manufacturing business: fewer than 500 workers
Wholesalers: fewer than 100 workers
Retailers: less than $7 million in annual sales
Agricultural business: less than $750,000
What is Small Business?
4
Typical Small-Business Ventures
5
Major Industries Dominated by Small Businesses
6
Creating New Jobs
Creating New Industries
Innovation
Contributions of Small Business
7
3 in 10 businesses close permanently within two years.
50% of businesses fail within five years.
By the 10-year mark, 66% of all small businesses have closed permanently.
Small Business Failure
8
Management Shortcomings
Inadequate Financing
Government Regulation
Reasons Why Small Business Fail
9
Government agency concerned with helping small business firms
Financial Assistance
Loan Guarantees
Microloans
Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs)
Small Business Administration
10
More than 40% of U.S. businesses are owned by women (10 million businesses)
The number of businesses owned by minorities outpaced the growth in the number of U.S. businesses overall.
Women and minorities still face challenges:
Opportunities for Women & Minorities
11
Minority-Owned Businesses
12
Forms of Private Business Ownership
Figure 5.4 Forms of Business Ownership
13
Domestic, foreign, alien
S Corporation
Limited Liability Companies
Employee-Owned Corporations
Not-for-Profit Corporations
Types of Corporations
14
Public ownership – a unit or agency of government owns and operates an organization. Parking structures, water systems, turnpike authority.
Collective Ownership– collective ownership of a production, storage, transportation or marketing organization is a cooperative.
Public and Collective Ownership of Business
15
Stockholders – acquire stocks in exchange for ownership
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Board of Directors – elected by stockholders to oversee corporation
Corporate Officers & Management – make major corporate de.
Small business was considered the future. Is it still amidst ev.docxjennifer822
Small business was considered the future. Is it still amidst everything going on in today's society? That being said, it is important to understand what an entrepreneur is and what is required to be successful.
What is your definition of an entrepreneur as applied business management? Do you think you have the motivation, determination, and resolve that are required for successful entrepreneurship? Explain. Including references and link.
.
SMALL BUSINESS LAW 1
SMALL BUSINESS LAW 3
Week 6 – Draft Research Paper
Brian Cooke
Wilmington University
BLA 310 – Small Business Law
04/23/2020
Abstract
It is indeed true that proper management of small businesses can offer protection from liability. Liability refers to the situation of being responsible for a particular act. A business is liable financially and legally. Proper liability risk management protects small businesses. The paper discusses several ways in which adequate management of liability risks can help in protecting small businesses against liabilities such as financial liabilities and legal liabilities. Proper procurement, cost, and change management also protect small businesses against liabilities.
How Proper Management of a Small Business Can Provide Protection from Liability
Operating a business can be fun, profitable, and challenging. However, the owner of a small business is legally liable hence can get sued. A lawsuit can be costly, emotionally draining, and time-consuming. For many small businesses, accusations associated with pending lawsuits can seriously damage their reputation. Civil suits against companies have increased by over 300% in the past two decades. Owners of small businesses need to protect themselves from huge expenses and devastating results resulting from unfavorable decisions in court. Many owners of small businesses fear to incur losses if a particular individual sues them. This is mainly for business owners who finance their companies using their capital. Liability comes in the form of financial liability and legal liability. These forms of liability have significant impacts on small businesses. There are several ways in which small business owners can go about limiting the possibility of legal liabilities to ensure the continuity of a business. They include purchasing specific types of insurance covers and transforming the business into a limited liability company or corporation (LLC) (Gupta, 2019). These ways will help safeguard small companies against liability. However, one significant way in which small business owners can protect their businesses from liability is to ensure that various aspects of a business are properly managed. This paper examines how proper management of small companies can offer protection from liability.
Getting to Understand the Business Liability
Liability refers to the situation of being responsible for a particular act (Mancuso, 2019). A business is liable financially and legally (Mancuso, 2019). Any business is financially liable since there are some liabilities, such as payable debts. For instance, if a business applies for a loan, the outstanding loan balance will be regarded as a liability. This is because the business is responsible and obli.
Small Business Data BreachThesis statement In this i.docxjennifer822
Small Business Data Breach
Thesis statement:
In this incredibly fast pace world where technology is moving at the speed of light, it is becoming normal to hear of different businesses being invaded by cyber attacks. When this happens, the personal information of consumers and private information about the company are exposed. This exposure can create a financial hardship for small businesses and break the trust of their consumers.
Body
Small Business
How to protect the personal information of their customers.
How to respond to attack
What do they say to customers when there has been a breach
Who are the people trying to breach your business’s information and what are they after?
Personal information
Money
Business secrets
Conclusion
Being prepared and what it looks like to be prepared
The number of small business effected every year
.
Small Business Consulting Report I. INTRODUCTION In this sma.docxjennifer822
Small Business Consulting Report
I. INTRODUCTION In this small consulting report, we will be analyzing the company WOSH to determine its strengths, weaknesses and possible solutions to all of its operational problems which can be addressed from a consulting perspective. We will provide an in depth report which will outline the approach we feel should be deemed best for the company to follow to gain success in their industry. In this report we will not present a financial analysis of the company due to the fact that the company’s owner has decided the information is too confidential to share with anyone, but himself and his personal financial team at this moment. We will instead focus on the other aspects of the business which can be fully analyzed and possibly improved upon. In our report we will be looking directly into many aspects of the company’s current operations. We will begin by analyzing the company’s background. We will look briefly at when and where it was founded, who founded it, what their mission statement is, what their ultimate goal is in terms of expansion and what are their primary products or services they offer. We will then take a brief look at what the company’s structure is like. We will do this in order to try to later determine where all decisions are made and by who and which level in the company has the most influence on how effectively the company is run. This can be very important when analyzing how a firm conducts day-to day operations. We will then take a look at all aspects of the company separately to try to find problems in the company’s operations. We will first take a look at the company’s current management approach, which refers to the way current management is handling all assets and employees which can be either loosely or closely managed. We will try to determine if all assets are being put to the best use possible with their approach or if a different approach is needed. We will also be looking into the company’s current marketing strategy and we will try to determine why they have chosen that specific strategy. In addition, we will determine whether or not this chosen strategy is the best fit for the company or if a different strategy approach may serve the company better and more effectively. Next we will look at the company’s current target market and we will determine if it is in fact the current target market the company is attracting. If it is not, then we will try to analyze why this is happening or even try to evaluate if they are even reaching those who they want and need to reach. Additionally, we will also take a look at how regular customers and businesses customers feel about the company. Talking to regular customers and business customers will help us determine their level of satisfaction and also to determine whether the company has any competitive advantages which helps distinguish it from competition. We will then evaluate if these advantages could possibly can be.
SlumlordsAssume you are the Chief of Police in a large city..docxjennifer822
Slumlords
Assume you are the Chief of Police in a large city. You have received several complaints regarding dilapidated homes in the city. These homes appear to be run by a slumlord(s). You must present this issue at the city council meeting for action.
Discuss the steps you would take to resolve this problem. What consequences do you foresee? What will you do?
.
SLP- IT Governance Dashboards, which display data using graphi.docxjennifer822
SLP- IT Governance
Dashboards, which display data using graphics, have become commonplace. They are used for many applications, such as showing voter turnout in different states during national elections. The first informational dashboards were used in early automobiles and featured gauges to indicate speed and mileage. Current automobile dashboards have become digital and can tell us much more about car performance than just miles per hour and distance traveled.
The dashboard concept is now used to render large amounts of data into a form that can be easily interpreted. Often, dashboards are interactive to allow the user to change some of the data inputs and displays. The Web now abounds in dashboards. The news media (CNN, MSNBC, etc.) are big on them.
The following dashboard was powered by live election results in the 2016 presidential election: www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
Describe another website (not about elections) that provides an example of a dashboard that can be used in Business Intelligence or in other areas to inform the viewer. Describe the data in the dashboard and discuss how the information is provided in the dashboard.
SLP Assignment Expectations
Provide a link to a digital dashboard used for Business Intelligence. Provide details on how the digital dashboard is used and your impression of the effectiveness of the dashboard. This should take 2 to 3 pages.
Background Readings
https://youtu.be/03jCdpwmdsU -Lecture Database and Big Data
Anand, Abhijith, Coltman, Tim, & Sharma, Rajeev (2016). Four steps to realizing business value from digital data stream. MIS Quarterly Executive,15(4), 259-277. How to Find MIS Quarterly Executive
Read Chapters 2 and 3 in:
Business Information Systems (2015). Business Information Systems (2015). The Saylor Foundation. www.saylorbooks.com Creative Commons Book.
Chen, Hong-Mei, Schütz, Roland, Kazman, Rick, & Matthes, Florian (2017). How Lufthnsa capitalized on big data for business model renovation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 19-34. How to Find MIS Quarterly Executive
Introduction to Computer Information Systems/Information Systems, Creative Commons license. Section 2. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Computer_Information_Systems
Ives, Blake, Palese, Biagio, & Rodriguez, Joaquin A. (2016). Enhancing customer service through the Internet of Things and digital data streams. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(4), 279-297. How to Find MIS Quarterly Executive
Maring, Kristen. E (2015) Ethical issues in the big data industry. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(2), 67-85. How to Find MIS Quarterly Executive
Mehrabani, Afshin (2014). Mongo: DB high availability: Design and implement a highly available server using the latest features of MondoDB. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Read Chapter 8 in: Pearlson, K.E. and Saunders, C.S. (2010). Managing and using information systems: A strategic approach. John Wiley & Sons. .
Slowing Down Global WarmingAs Hite and Seitz (2016) discuss .docxjennifer822
Slowing Down Global Warming
As Hite and Seitz (2016) discuss in Chapter 5: Climate Change, reputable scientific studies continue to show that the Earth is warming at an unsustainable rate because of a rise in the release of CO2 and methane gases.
What is the relationship between population increases and climate change? Do you think fertility control is an effective strategy to halt climate change? Why or why not?
.
SLO 4 - Technology Use the computer for research, computation and.docxjennifer822
SLO 4 - Technology:
Use the computer for research, computation and word processing for written reports, conducting online quizzes, problem solving, and electronic communication and to become aware of available tools and resources.
SLO 5: Discipline/Subject Area Specific Content Material:
Analyze and apply sociological concepts to understanding the structure and dynamics of marriages, families and relationships.
Instructions
For this analysis, you will choose just ONE source from one of the following groups that that relates to the topic and goals you stated in your proposal. Use ONE sociological theory to analyze and interpret the content of the source you chose.
Mainstream News Media: newspaper, magazine, or web-based articles
Entertainment: Recent T.V. shows, movies, books, music (lyrics, videos)
Government or public policy sources
Peer-reviewed professional or academic Journals – articles for analysis 5 must be from peer-reviewed journals
.
SLO # 1Apply knowledge of the roles of interdisciplinary team m.docxjennifer822
SLO # 1:
Apply knowledge of the roles of interdisciplinary team members to improving access to healthcare and health outcomes of clients from various cultures
SLO # 2:Discuss barriers to healthcare access for clients from various cultures
3 pages excluding cover page and reference page
.
slides10 Crusade and the Twelfth Century.pptx.docxjennifer822
slides/10 Crusade and the Twelfth Century.pptx
3
León’s First Queen
Alfonso VI married his daughter to
Alfonso I of Aragon.
Urraca was already a widow, with a
legitimate son (and heir) born in 1104
named… Alfonso.
Ruled the kingdom from
1109-1126.
Incest makes the world go round
The marriage of Urraca and Alfonso of Aragon was a violation of canon (Church) law, which forbid relations between third (or closer) cousins.
Both Urraca and Alfonso were great-grandchildren of Sancho the Great, and were thus cousins.
Such marriages were considered consanguineous, meaning the partners “shared blood”.
What is more important… political expediency or Church approval?
Unhappy Marriage
Political expediency doesn’t work… no kids.
Urraca said Alfonso beat her, and she used this as grounds for separation.
Alfonso said Urraca was an adulteress, and blamed her scandalous sexuality on her polygamous father.
Urraca as Queen
Alfonso el Batallador
King of Aragon from 1104-1134
Conquered Zaragoza in 1118, more than doubling the size of Aragon.
Military man, uninterested in family
life. After Urraca died, he remarried,
but never produced an heir.
Fascination with the crusade.
Christendom and Crusade
Church Reform in the Eleventh Century
Cluny
Monastic reform
Church reform
Independence from kings and nobles
Restore the leading role of the church in society
Power of the pope, hierarchy
Create a stronger Christian society
Peace and Truce of God
Curb the bad behavior of knights, lords, the warrior aristocracy
Limit sinful activity (murder, violence, etc)
Church councils began placing restrictions on combat, forbidding fighting on Sundays, holidays (Holy Days), and anywhere near churches.
Spiritual sanctions were used to enforce this– excommunication.
The Reform movement in Iberia
Cluniac monasteries
Cluniac bishops: Toledo, Valencia
Around 1100 the Kingdom of León abandoned its traditional mass (known as the Mozarabic mass) in favor of the Roman mass, on Alfonso VI’s orders.
Beginning in the eleventh century, the papacy began taking greater interest in Iberian affairs… for example, condemning the incestual marriage of Urraca and Alfonso of Aragon.
Gregory VII
Pope 1073-1085
Aggressively promoted the rights of the Church over secular rulers– he excommunicated the Holy Roman Emperor (King of Germany)
Imagined harnessing the power of a united Christendom, under papal control, which could do all sorts of great things, like conquer the Holy Land!
The Holy Land
Pilgrimage destination since the days of Constantine… Visit the sites of the Bible.
Pilgrimage was very popular in the elventh century… most people visited local holy sites, but the ambitious (or wealthy) might travel to Rome, Santiago or even Jerusalem
Pope Urban and the Idea of Crusade
The secretary of Gregory VII became Pope Urban II in 1088.
Help Constantinople against the
Turks
Gregory’s idea of an armed
pilgrimage to Jerusalem
Council of Clermont,.
Slides should include highlight major points with detailed speaker n.docxjennifer822
Slides should include highlight major points with detailed speaker notes to
elaborate on your points made on the slide. Use sub-sections when discussing Security/Counterterrorism Measures.
Length
: Minimum of 12 slides (not counting reference slide).
Citations/References:
You must use APA style for this assignment. Adhere to the APA for reference formatting: alphabetize, only first initials for first names, double space references, and use a hanging indent.
.
Slide concept by Anthony DAscoli FOR EDUCA.docxjennifer822
*
Slide concept by Anthony D'Ascoli
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
For publication, reproduction or transmission of images, please contact individual artists, estates, photographers and exhibiting institutions for permissions and rights.
Roman Empire at Greatest Extent
The Roman EraApril 21, 753 BCE – the legendary founding of Rome by Romulus & Remus753- 509 BCE – Roman monarchy 509 – 27 BCE – Roman Republican Period264 – 241 BCE First Punic War – Rome vs Carthage – Rome gains Sicily, Sardinia and Corsica218 – 201 BCE – Second Punic War – Hannibal invades Italy with elephants traveling through the Alps – Rome vs Carthage – Rome wins – gains southern Spain, coastal France and part of North Africa149 -146 BCE – Third Punic War – Rome vs Carthage – Rome wins – gains modern day Tunisia and names it Africa as Roman province- Carthage is destroyed
The Roman Era
88 – 79 BCE – First Roman Civil War – Marius vs Sulla – Sulla wins – implements first dictatorship without time limit73-71 BCE – Spartacus leads slave revolt – eventually crushed by Crassus60 BCE – formation of the First Triumvirate – Julius Caesar, Pompey & Crassus rule Rome illegally58 – 50 BCE – Gaul conquered by G. Julius Caesar49-46 BCE Second Roman Civil War – Caesar vs Pompey – Caesar wins – becomes dictator for life – beginning of end for Rome as a RepublicMarch 15, 44 BCE – Julius Caesar is assassinated by Senators led by Brutus and Cassius
The Roman Era43 BCE – Second Triumvirate formed by Octavian Caesar, Mark Antony and Lepidus in order to catch Caesar’s murderers31 BCE – Third Roman Civil War – Octavian vs Mark Antony & Cleopatra – Octavian wins becomes sole ruler of Roman world – Egypt becomes Roman province27 BCE – Octavian changes his name to Augustus (revered one) – Official End of Roman Republic: Rome becomes an Empire – Augustus its first Emperor27 BCE – 476 CE – Roman Imperial Period (Roman Empire)27 BCE – 68 CE – Julio-Claudian Dynasty rules in Rome (Augustus, Tiberias, Caligula, Claudius & Nero)64 CE – Great Fire in Rome – Nero blames and then persecutes Christians – Saints Peter and Paul are martyred69 – 96 CE – Flavian Dynasty rules Rome (Vespasian, Titus and Domitian)
The Roman Era
August 24, 79 CE – Mount Vesuvius erupts destroying Pompeii, Stabiae and Herculaneum96 – 180 CE – Reign of the 5 Good Emperors (Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius & Marcus Aurelius)98 – 117 – Reign of Trajan – Roman Empire reaches its largest extent180 CE – reign of Commodus ends the Pax Romana (200 years of peace in Rome)192 – 395 Late Imperial Period – decay in art and leadership with few exceptions193 – 235 – Severan Dynasty rules Rome (Septimus Severus, Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus and Alexander Severus)235-284 – Rule of the Barracks Emperors (Emperors came from army) – chaotic period of rulers284 – 305 – Reign of Diocletian – forms tetrarchy (rule of 4) to stop chaos of succession- starts Great Persecution of Christians – destroys churches and kills many people
.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Small Group Discussion Grading RubricParticipation for MSNSmal.docx
1. Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric
Participation for MSN
Small Group Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the small group discussions
(GDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they
achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated
with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize,
integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their
selected field of practice. The use of GDs provides students
with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge
and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid
environment that models professional and social interaction.
The GD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of
student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant
scholarship. Participation in the GDs generates opportunities for
students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by
carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the
contributions of their peers and course faculty. GDs foster the
development of members into a community of learners as they
share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be
different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other
disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly group discussion is worth a maximum of 50 points.
Students must post a minimum of four times in each discussion.
One of these posts must be a summary of learning for the week.
The initial response to the discussion prompt must be posted by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. Each of the
subsequent posts must occur on days following the initial
response. The final posting deadline for all subsequent posts is
by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. For week 8 only,
subsequent posts must occur by the Saturday deadline-11:59 pm
MT. If the student does not meet the Wednesday posting
deadline for the initial posting, a late penalty is applied of 5
2. points. Not meeting the requirements for subsequent postings,
either in number or deadline, will result in a loss of 5 points.
Group Discussion Responses
Small group discussions provide the opportunity for deep
exploration and new knowledge discovery of course topics. This
type of exploration requires synthesis of various sources of
information. Responses in group discussions should be
substantive, reflect the student’s personal position on the topic,
thoroughly address the information being asked for by the
prompt, and include insights based on others’ postings. Direct
quotes in group discussions should be a rare occurrence. These
are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15
words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion.
Points will be deducted under Scholarliness and/or Course
Knowledge rubric categories.
MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21
Executive Track
MSNST_GroupDiscussionGradingRubric_Final_2019.02.21
Executive Track
MSN-ST Executive Track
Small Group Discussion Grading Rubric Guidelines
Point Values
Exceptional
Exceeds
Meets
3. Needs Improvement
Developing
Performance Category
15
14
13
9
0
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional
and academic decisions.
All three elements are addressed and clearly accurately
articulated
• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information
on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced
by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support
interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on
required topic
Two(2) of three (3) elements addressed and accurately
articulated; remaining element vaguely addressed or is missing
• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information
4. on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced
by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support
interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on
required topic
All elements are present but lack clarity and are generally
addressed; Little evidence of understanding of topic is present
• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information
on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced
by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support
interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on
required topic
2 or less elements are superficially addressed with little
supportive evidence of understanding of topic is present
• develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information
on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced
by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support
interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on
required topic
All three elements are missing or not discernible
5. • develops a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information
on required topic
• provides substantive support of analysis/synthesis evidenced
by review of scholarly literature
• uses relevant valid, current, and scholarly sources to support
interpretations, analysis, and synthesis of information on
required topic
Performance Category
15
14
13
9
0
Course Knowledge
15.0 pts
All four (4) required elements are addressed and clearly
articulated
• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within
lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt
•Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage
further exploration and discovery
•Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to discussion
topic
6. • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional
setting and or relevant application to real life.
Two of three elements addressed and clearly articulated,
remaining element vaguely addressed or missing
•Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within
lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt
•Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage
further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to
discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional
setting and or relevant application to real life
All elements are present but lack clarity and are generally
addressed; Little evidence of understanding of topic present
• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within
lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt
• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage
further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to
discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional
setting and or relevant application to real life.
Three or less elements are superficially addressed with little
supportive evidence of understanding of topic present
7. • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within
lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt
• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage
further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to
discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional
setting and or relevant application to real life.
All elements are missing, not discernible, or irrelevant to topic
• Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed within
lesson, scholarly sources, and guided discussion prompt
• Interactions with classmates are engaging and encourage
further exploration and discovery
• Interactions with classmates are directly relevant to
discussion topic
• Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional
setting and or relevant application to real life.
Performance Category
20
18
16
14
0
Interactive Dialogue
8. Posts accurately address all five(5) elements, clearly
articulated; specific connections are made to topic and
discussion
· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @
11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required
posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and
readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2
scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage
group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by
content and group discussion
Posts accurately address four(4) of five(5) elements, clearly
articulated; specific connections are made to topic and
discussion
· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @
11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required
posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and
readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2
scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage
group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by
content and group discussion
Posts generally address three (3) of five(5) required elements;
limited connections are made to topic and discussion
9. · Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @
11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required
posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and
readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2
scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage
group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by
content and group discussion
Posts generally address required elements; limited connections
made to topic and discussion; fails to meet posting time and
number requirement
· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @
11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
· Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required
posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and
readings
· •Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of
2 scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage
group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by
content and group discussion
Does not respond to group discussion; No connections made to
topic; Superficial posts lacking substance and scholarly support
· Replies to instructor prompt and facilitator by Wednesday @
11:59pm MT
· Responds to discussion group at least four times
10. · Summary post (which may be counted as one of the 4 required
posts) includes what was learned from discussion, lesson, and
readings
· Posts are substantive with evidence cited from a minimum of 2
scholarly sources to support thoughts and ideas, and engage
group in further discussion
· Posts reflect thoughts, ideas, and questions stimulated by
content and group discussion
Minus 1 Points
Minus 3 Points
Minus 5 Points
Minus 7 Points
Minus 9 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note
this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the
student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming
weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of
writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual Current Edition
· 2-3 errors in APA format.
· Written responses
have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
· Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates
communication.
· 4-5 errors in APA format.
· Writing responses
11. have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
· Writing style is somewhat focused.
· 6-7 errors in APA format.
· Writing responses
have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
· Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to
understand.
· 8-10 errors in APA format.
· Writing responses
have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
· Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to
understand.
· Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
· Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling
and punctuation errors.
· Writing style does not facilitate communication.
· The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the
above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost
-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements
12. per discussion thread
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic
on one day and posts a second response on another day.
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two
postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirementper discussion thread
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded
discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course
instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m.
MT of each week.
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive
response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59
pm MT.
NOTE: To receive credit for a week's discussion, students may
begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before
each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most
weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week's
assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT.
Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59
p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion
requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday of
the eighth week.
*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course
Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in
assignments and group discussions. These include peer reviewed
publications, government reports, or sources written by a
professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson
13. are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the
discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by
government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected
organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly
sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer
reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the
Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases
for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources
should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web
sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these.
Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and
quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site
with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the
student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com
site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are
unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not
demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for
not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources
are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years
or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a
source that is older than 5 years.
Public Administration and Information
Technology
Volume 10
Series Editor
Christopher G. Reddick
San Antonio, Texas, USA
14. [email protected]
More information about this series at
http://www.springer.com/series/10796
[email protected]
Marijn Janssen • Maria A. Wimmer
Ameneh Deljoo
Editors
Policy Practice and Digital
Science
Integrating Complex Systems, Social
Simulation and Public Administration
in Policy Research
2123
[email protected]
Editors
Marijn Janssen Ameneh Deljoo
Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Faculty of Technology,
Policy, and
Management Management
Delft University of Technology Delft University of Technology
Delft Delft
The Netherlands The Netherlands
16. or omissions that may have been made.
Printed on acid-free paper
Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media
(www.springer.com)
[email protected]
Preface
The last economic and financial crisis has heavily threatened
European and other
economies around the globe. Also, the Eurozone crisis, the
energy and climate
change crises, challenges of demographic change with high
unemployment rates,
and the most recent conflicts in the Ukraine and the near East or
the Ebola virus
disease in Africa threaten the wealth of our societies in
different ways. The inability
to predict or rapidly deal with dramatic changes and negative
trends in our economies
and societies can seriously hamper the wealth and prosperity of
the European Union
and its Member States as well as the global networks. These
societal and economic
challenges demonstrate an urgent need for more effective and
efficient processes of
governance and policymaking, therewith specifically addressing
crisis management
and economic/welfare impact reduction.
Therefore, investing in the exploitation of innovative
17. information and commu-
nication technology (ICT) in the support of good governance
and policy modeling
has become a major effort of the European Union to position
itself and its Member
States well in the global digital economy. In this realm, the
European Union has
laid out clear strategic policy objectives for 2020 in the Europe
2020 strategy1: In
a changing world, we want the EU to become a smart,
sustainable, and inclusive
economy. These three mutually reinforcing priorities should
help the EU and the
Member States deliver high levels of employment, productivity,
and social cohesion.
Concretely, the Union has set five ambitious objectives—on
employment, innovation,
education, social inclusion, and climate/energy—to be reached
by 2020. Along with
this, Europe 2020 has established four priority areas—smart
growth, sustainable
growth, inclusive growth, and later added: A strong and
effective system of eco-
nomic governance—designed to help Europe emerge from the
crisis stronger and to
coordinate policy actions between the EU and national levels.
To specifically support European research in strengthening
capacities, in overcom-
ing fragmented research in the field of policymaking, and in
advancing solutions for
1 Europe 2020 http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm
v
18. [email protected]
vi Preface
ICT supported governance and policy modeling, the European
Commission has co-
funded an international support action called eGovPoliNet2. The
overall objective
of eGovPoliNet was to create an international, cross-
disciplinary community of re-
searchers working on ICT solutions for governance and policy
modeling. In turn,
the aim of this community was to advance and sustain research
and to share the
insights gleaned from experiences in Europe and globally. To
achieve this, eGovPo-
liNet established a dialogue, brought together experts from
distinct disciplines, and
collected and analyzed knowledge assets (i.e., theories,
concepts, solutions, findings,
and lessons on ICT solutions in the field) from different
research disciplines. It built
on case material accumulated by leading actors coming from
distinct disciplinary
backgrounds and brought together the innovative knowledge in
the field. Tools, meth-
ods, and cases were drawn from the academic community, the
ICT sector, specialized
policy consulting firms as well as from policymakers and
governance experts. These
results were assembled in a knowledge base and analyzed in
order to produce com-
parative analyses and descriptions of cases, tools, and scientific
approaches to enrich
19. a common knowledge base accessible via www.policy-
community.eu.
This book, entitled “Policy Practice and Digital Science—
Integrating Complex
Systems, Social Simulation, and Public Administration in Policy
Research,” is one
of the exciting results of the activities of eGovPoliNet—fusing
community building
activities and activities of knowledge analysis. It documents
findings of comparative
analyses and brings in experiences of experts from academia
and from case descrip-
tions from all over the globe. Specifically, it demonstrates how
the explosive growth
in data, computational power, and social media creates new
opportunities for policy-
making and research. The book provides a first comprehensive
look on how to take
advantage of the development in the digital world with new
approaches, concepts,
instruments, and methods to deal with societal and
computational complexity. This
requires the knowledge traditionally found in different
disciplines including public
administration, policy analyses, information systems, complex
systems, and com-
puter science to work together in a multidisciplinary fashion
and to share approaches.
This book provides the foundation for strongly multidisciplinary
research, in which
the various developments and disciplines work together from a
comprehensive and
holistic policymaking perspective. A wide range of aspects for
social and professional
networking and multidisciplinary constituency building along
20. the axes of technol-
ogy, participative processes, governance, policy modeling,
social simulation, and
visualization are tackled in the 19 papers.
With this book, the project makes an effective contribution to
the overall objec-
tives of the Europe 2020 strategy by providing a better
understanding of different
approaches to ICT enabled governance and policy modeling, and
by overcoming the
fragmented research of the past. This book provides impressive
insights into various
theories, concepts, and solutions of ICT supported policy
modeling and how stake-
holders can be more actively engaged in public policymaking. It
draws conclusions
2 eGovPoliNet is cofunded under FP 7, Call identifier FP7-ICT-
2011-7, URL: www.policy-
community.eu
[email protected]
Preface vii
of how joint multidisciplinary research can bring more effective
and resilient find-
ings for better predicting dramatic changes and negative trends
in our economies and
societies.
It is my great pleasure to provide the preface to the book
resulting from the
21. eGovPoliNet project. This book presents stimulating research by
researchers coming
from all over Europe and beyond. Congratulations to the project
partners and to the
authors!—Enjoy reading!
Thanassis Chrissafis
Project officer of eGovPoliNet
European Commission
DG CNECT, Excellence in Science, Digital Science
[email protected]
Contents
1 Introduction to Policy-Making in the Digital Age . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 1
Marijn Janssen and Maria A. Wimmer
2 Educating Public Managers and Policy Analysts
in an Era of Informatics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 15
Christopher Koliba and Asim Zia
3 The Quality of Social Simulation: An Example from Research
Policy Modelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Petra Ahrweiler and Nigel Gilbert
4 Policy Making and Modelling in a Complex World . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 57
Wander Jager and Bruce Edmonds
5 From Building a Model to Adaptive Robust Decision Making
22. Using Systems Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 75
Erik Pruyt
6 Features and Added Value of Simulation Models Using
Different
Modelling Approaches Supporting Policy-Making: A
Comparative
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Dragana Majstorovic, Maria A.Wimmer, Roy Lay-Yee, Peter
Davis
and Petra Ahrweiler
7 A Comparative Analysis of Tools and Technologies
for Policy Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 125
Eleni Kamateri, Eleni Panopoulou, Efthimios Tambouris,
Konstantinos Tarabanis, Adegboyega Ojo, Deirdre Lee
and David Price
8 Value Sensitive Design of Complex Product Systems . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 157
Andreas Ligtvoet, Geerten van de Kaa, Theo Fens, Cees van
Beers,
Paulier Herder and Jeroen van den Hoven
ix
[email protected]
x Contents
9 Stakeholder Engagement in Policy Development: Observations
23. and Lessons from International Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 177
Natalie Helbig, Sharon Dawes, Zamira Dzhusupova, Bram
Klievink
and Catherine Gerald Mkude
10 Values in Computational Models Revalued . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 205
Rebecca Moody and Lasse Gerrits
11 The Psychological Drivers of Bureaucracy: Protecting
the Societal Goals of an Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 221
Tjeerd C. Andringa
12 Active and Passive Crowdsourcing in Government . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 261
Euripidis Loukis and Yannis Charalabidis
13 Management of Complex Systems: Toward Agent-Based
Gaming for Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 291
Wander Jager and Gerben van der Vegt
14 The Role of Microsimulation in the Development of Public
Policy . . . 305
Roy Lay-Yee and Gerry Cotterell
15 Visual Decision Support for Policy Making: Advancing
Policy
Analysis with Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 321
Tobias Ruppert, Jens Dambruch, Michel Krämer, Tina Balke,
Marco
Gavanelli, Stefano Bragaglia, Federico Chesani, Michela
Milano
24. and Jörn Kohlhammer
16 Analysis of Five Policy Cases in the Field of Energy Policy .
. . . . . . . . 355
Dominik Bär, Maria A.Wimmer, Jozef Glova, Anastasia
Papazafeiropoulou and Laurence Brooks
17 Challenges to Policy-Making in Developing Countries
and the Roles of Emerging Tools, Methods and Instruments:
Experiences from Saint Petersburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 379
Dmitrii Trutnev, Lyudmila Vidyasova and Andrei Chugunov
18 Sustainable Urban Development, Governance and Policy:
A Comparative Overview of EU Policies and Projects . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 393
Diego Navarra and Simona Milio
19 eParticipation, Simulation Exercise and Leadership Training
in Nigeria: Bridging the Digital Divide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 417
Tanko Ahmed
[email protected]
Contributors
Tanko Ahmed National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies
(NIPSS), Jos,
Nigeria
Petra Ahrweiler EA European Academy of Technology and
Innovation Assess-
ment GmbH, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany
25. Tjeerd C. Andringa University College Groningen, Institute of
Artificial In-
telligence and Cognitive Engineering (ALICE), University of
Groningen, AB,
Groningen, the Netherlands
Tina Balke University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
Dominik Bär University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, Germany
Cees van Beers Faculty of Technology, Policy, and
Management, Delft University
of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Stefano Bragaglia University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Laurence Brooks Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Yannis Charalabidis University of the Aegean, Samos, Greece
Federico Chesani University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Andrei Chugunov ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Gerry Cotterell Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the
Social Sciences
(COMPASS Research Centre), University of Auckland,
Auckland, New Zealand
Jens Dambruch Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics
Research, Darmstadt,
Germany
Peter Davis Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the
Social Sciences
26. (COMPASS Research Centre), University of Auckland,
Auckland, New Zealand
Sharon Dawes Center for Technology in Government,
University at Albany,
Albany, New York, USA
xi
[email protected]
xii Contributors
Zamira Dzhusupova Department of Public Administration and
Development Man-
agement, United Nations Department of Economic and Social
Affairs (UNDESA),
NewYork, USA
Bruce Edmonds Manchester Metropolitan University,
Manchester, UK
Theo Fens Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management,
Delft University of
Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Marco Gavanelli University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Lasse Gerrits Department of Public Administration, Erasmus
University
Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Nigel Gilbert University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
27. Jozef Glova Technical University Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia
Natalie Helbig Center for Technology in Government,
University at Albany,
Albany, New York, USA
Paulier Herder Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management,
Delft University
of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Jeroen van den Hoven Faculty of Technology, Policy, and
Management, Delft
University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Wander Jager Groningen Center of Social Complexity Studies,
University of
Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Marijn Janssen Faculty of Technology, Policy, and
Management, Delft University
of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Geerten van de Kaa Faculty of Technology, Policy, and
Management, Delft
University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Eleni Kamateri Information Technologies Institute, Centre for
Research &
Technology—Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
Bram Klievink Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management,
Delft University
of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Jörn Kohlhammer GRIS, TU Darmstadt & Fraunhofer IGD,
Darmstadt, Germany
28. Christopher Koliba University of Vermont, Burlington, VT,
USA
Michel Krämer Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics
Research, Darmstadt,
Germany
Roy Lay-Yee Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the
Social Sciences
(COMPASS Research Centre), University of Auckland,
Auckland, New Zealand
Deirdre Lee INSIGHT Centre for Data Analytics, NUIG,
Galway, Ireland
[email protected]
Contributors xiii
Andreas Ligtvoet Faculty of Technology, Policy, and
Management, Delft Univer-
sity of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Euripidis Loukis University of the Aegean, Samos, Greece
Dragana Majstorovic University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz,
Germany
Michela Milano University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Simona Milio London School of Economics, Houghton Street,
London, UK
29. Catherine Gerald Mkude Institute for IS Research, University of
Koblenz-Landau,
Koblenz, Germany
Rebecca Moody Department of Public Administration, Erasmus
University
Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Diego Navarra Studio Navarra, London, UK
Adegboyega Ojo INSIGHT Centre for Data Analytics, NUIG,
Galway, Ireland
Eleni Panopoulou Information Technologies Institute, Centre
for Research &
Technology—Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
David Price Thoughtgraph Ltd, Somerset, UK
Erik Pruyt Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management,
Delft University of
Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for
Advanced Study,
Wassenaar, The Netherlands
Tobias Ruppert Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics
Research, Darmstadt,
Germany
Efthimios Tambouris Information Technologies Institute, Centre
for Research &
Technology—Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece; University of
Macedonia, Thessaloniki,
Greece
30. Konstantinos Tarabanis Information Technologies Institute,
Centre for Research
& Technology—Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece; University of
Macedonia, Thessa-
loniki, Greece
Dmitrii Trutnev ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Gerben van der Vegt Faculty of Economics and Business,
University of Groningen,
Groningen, The Netherlands
Lyudmila Vidyasova ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Maria A. Wimmer University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz,
Germany
Asim Zia University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
[email protected]
Chapter 1
Introduction to Policy-Making in the Digital Age
Marijn Janssen and Maria A. Wimmer
We are running the 21st century using 20th century systems on
top of 19th century political structures. . . .
John Pollock, contributing editor MIT technology review
Abstract The explosive growth in data, computational power,
and social media
creates new opportunities for innovating governance and policy-
31. making. These in-
formation and communications technology (ICT) developments
affect all parts of
the policy-making cycle and result in drastic changes in the way
policies are devel-
oped. To take advantage of these developments in the digital
world, new approaches,
concepts, instruments, and methods are needed, which are able
to deal with so-
cietal complexity and uncertainty. This field of research is
sometimes depicted
as e-government policy, e-policy, policy informatics, or data
science. Advancing
our knowledge demands that different scientific communities
collaborate to create
practice-driven knowledge. For policy-making in the digital age
disciplines such as
complex systems, social simulation, and public administration
need to be combined.
1.1 Introduction
Policy-making and its subsequent implementation is necessary
to deal with societal
problems. Policy interventions can be costly, have long-term
implications, affect
groups of citizens or even the whole country and cannot be
easily undone or are even
irreversible. New information and communications technology
(ICT) and models
can help to improve the quality of policy-makers. In particular,
the explosive growth
in data, computational power, and social media creates new
opportunities for in-
novating the processes and solutions of ICT-based policy-
making and research. To
33. Both policy-makers and those in charge of policy
implementations acknowledge
that ICT is becoming more and more important and is changing
the policy-making
process, resulting in a next generation policy-making based on
ICT support. The field
of policy-making is changing driven by developments such as
open data, computa-
tional methods for processing data, opinion mining, simulation,
and visualization of
rich data sets, all combined with public engagement, social
media, and participatory
tools. In this respect Web 2.0 and even Web 3.0 point to the
specific applications of
social networks and semantically enriched and linked data
which are important for
policy-making. In policy-making vast amount of data are used
for making predictions
and forecasts. This should result in improving the outcomes of
policy-making.
Policy-making is confronted with an increasing complexity and
uncertainty of the
outcomes which results in a need for developing policy models
that are able to deal
with this. To improve the validity of the models policy-makers
are harvesting data to
generate evidence. Furthermore, they are improving their
models to capture complex
phenomena and dealing with uncertainty and limited and
incomplete information.
Despite all these efforts, there remains often uncertainty
concerning the outcomes of
policy interventions. Given the uncertainty, often multiple
scenarios are developed
to show alternative outcomes and impact. A condition for this is
34. the visualization of
policy alternatives and its impact. Visualization can ensure
involvement of nonexpert
and to communicate alternatives. Furthermore, games can be
used to let people gain
insight in what can happen, given a certain scenario. Games
allow persons to interact
and to experience what happens in the future based on their
interventions.
Policy-makers are often faced with conflicting solutions to
complex problems,
thus making it necessary for them to test out their assumptions,
interventions, and
resolutions. For this reason policy-making organizations
introduce platforms facili-
tating policy-making and citizens engagements and enabling the
processing of large
volumes of data. There are various participative platforms
developed by government
agencies (e.g., De Reuver et al. 2013; Slaviero et al. 2010;
Welch 2012). Platforms
can be viewed as a kind of regulated environment that enable
developers, users, and
others to interact with each other, share data, services, and
applications, enable gov-
ernments to more easily monitor what is happening and
facilitate the development
of innovative solutions (Janssen and Estevez 2013). Platforms
should provide not
only support for complex policy deliberations with citizens but
should also bring to-
gether policy-modelers, developers, policy-makers, and other
stakeholders involved
in policy-making. In this way platforms provide an information-
rich, interactive
35. [email protected]
1 Introduction to Policy-Making in the Digital Age 3
environment that brings together relevant stakeholders and in
which complex phe-
nomena can be modeled, simulated, visualized, discussed, and
even the playing of
games can be facilitated.
1.2 Complexity and Uncertainty in Policy-Making
Policy-making is driven by the need to solve societal problems
and should result in
interventions to solve these societal problems. Examples of
societal problems are
unemployment, pollution, water quality, safety, criminality,
well-being, health, and
immigration. Policy-making is an ongoing process in which
issues are recognized
as a problem, alternative courses of actions are formulated,
policies are affected,
implemented, executed, and evaluated (Stewart et al. 2007).
Figure 1.1 shows the
typical stages of policy formulation, implementation, execution,
enforcement, and
evaluation. This process should not be viewed as linear as many
interactions are
necessary as well as interactions with all kind of stakeholders.
In policy-making
processes a vast amount of stakeholders are always involved,
which makes policy-
making complex.
36. Once a societal need is identified, a policy has to be formulated.
Politicians,
members of parliament, executive branches, courts, and interest
groups may be
involved in these formulations. Often contradictory proposals
are made, and the
impact of a proposal is difficult to determine as data is missing,
models cannot
citizen
s
Policy formulation
Policy
implementation
Policy
execution
Policy
enforcement and
evaluation
politicians
Policy-
makers
Administrative
organizations
b
u
37. sin
esses
Inspection and
enforcement agencies
experts
Fig. 1.1 Overview of policy cycle and stakeholders
[email protected]
4 M. Janssen and M. A. Wimmer
capture the complexity, and the results of policy models are
difficult to interpret and
even might be interpreted in an opposing way. This is further
complicated as some
proposals might be good but cannot be implemented or are too
costly to implement.
There is a large uncertainty concerning the outcomes.
Policy implementation is done by organizations other than those
that formulated
the policy. They often have to interpret the policy and have to
make implemen-
tation decisions. Sometimes IT can block quick implementation
as systems have
to be changed. Although policy-making is the domain of the
government, private
organizations can be involved to some extent, in particular in
the execution of policies.
38. Once all things are ready and decisions are made, policies need
to be executed.
During the execution small changes are typically made to fine
tune the policy formu-
lation, implementation decisions might be more difficult to
realize, policies might
bring other benefits than intended, execution costs might be
higher and so on. Typ-
ically, execution is continually changing. Evaluation is part of
the policy-making
process as it is necessary to ensure that the policy-execution
solved the initial so-
cietal problem. Policies might become obsolete, might not work,
have unintended
affects (like creating bureaucracy) or might lose its support
among elected officials,
or other alternatives might pop up that are better.
Policy-making is a complex process in which many stakeholders
play a role. In
the various phases of policy-making different actors are
dominant and play a role.
Figure 1.1 shows only some actors that might be involved, and
many of them are not
included in this figure. The involvement of so many actors
results in fragmentation
and often actors are even not aware of the decisions made by
other actors. This makes
it difficult to manage a policy-making process as each actor has
other goals and might
be self-interested.
Public values (PVs) are a way to try to manage complexity and
give some guidance.
Most policies are made to adhere to certain values. Public value
management (PVM)
39. represents the paradigm of achieving PVs as being the primary
objective (Stoker
2006). PVM refers to the continuous assessment of the actions
performed by public
officials to ensure that these actions result in the creation of PV
(Moore 1995). Public
servants are not only responsible for following the right
procedure, but they also have
to ensure that PVs are realized. For example, civil servants
should ensure that garbage
is collected. The procedure that one a week garbage is collected
is secondary. If it is
necessary to collect garbage more (or less) frequently to ensure
a healthy environment
then this should be done. The role of managers is not only to
ensure that procedures
are followed but they should be custodians of public assets and
maximize a PV.
There exist a wide variety of PVs (Jørgensen and Bozeman
2007). PVs can be
long-lasting or might be driven by contemporary politics. For
example, equal access
is a typical long-lasting value, whereas providing support for
students at universities
is contemporary, as politicians might give more, less, or no
support to students. PVs
differ over times, but also the emphasis on values is different in
the policy-making
cycle as shown in Fig. 1.2. In this figure some of the values
presented by Jørgensen
and Bozeman (2007) are mapped onto the four policy-making
stages. Dependent on
the problem at hand other values might play a role that is not
included in this figure.
40. [email protected]
1 Introduction to Policy-Making in the Digital Age 5
Policy
formulation
Policy
implementation
Policy
execution
Policy
enforcement
and evaluation
efficiency
efficiency
accountability
transparancy
responsiveness
public interest
will of the people
listening
41. citizen involvement
evidence-based
protection of
individual rights
accountability
transparancy
evidence-based
equal access
balancing of interests
robust
honesty
fair
timelessness
reliable
flexible
fair
Fig. 1.2 Public values in the policy cycle
Policy is often formulated by politicians in consultation with
experts. In the PVM
paradigm, public administrations aim at creating PVs for society
and citizens. This
42. suggests a shift from talking about what citizens expect in
creating a PV. In this view
public officials should focus on collaborating and creating a
dialogue with citizens
in order to determine what constitutes a PV.
1.3 Developments
There is an …