SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Classical Conditioning
Stimulus -Response
Defining Learning in the light of
Classical Conditioning Theory
• Learning is an observable change of performance
through acquiring a set of new habits involving
the mechanism of stimulus and response.
• In a foreign language situation , learners are
faced with interference from the L1 or the
mother tongue , which is inevitable.
• This interference can be an obstacle to effective
communication in the target language.
Different view of L1 interference
• Netwark (1996) , suggests that L1 does not really interfere
but learners fall back to the mother tongue , when there is
lack in the knowledge of the target language .
• Another aspect of conditioning is rewarding.
• Conclusion:
• In the behaviourist view all learning results automatically
and mechanically from stimulus and response.
• Notice:
• When does a foreign language learner or a second
language learner revert to his mother tongue? Even if he is
efficent in the target language ?!
CREATIVE LEARNING
• This view sees Language more than habit
formation .
• Learners bring to the situation their own creative
abilities :
• They compare and contrast..
• They make analogies.
• They are interactive and influential.
• They are conscious of at least a part of the
learning processes.
A comparison between Adult and
Children in ESL /EFL
• Adults can never be as
good as children learning
a language.
• Adults have to work at
learning a language.
• An adult can reason more
effectively.
• In vocabulary and
grammar , an adult
performs more correctly.
• Children are good
language learners.
• It is said that children do
not.
• On theother hand, a child
cannot.
• A child pronouces better.
• A child cannot get to the
adult level in the foreign
language.
• It is the meaning of words and sentences
which is crucial to language learning.
• Language cannot be learned without the
situation of a meaningful use.
• The nature of Language is within
the bounds of grammaticality.
The meaningful use of Language

SECOND LANGUAGE Acquisition.pptx

  • 1.
    SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING ClassicalConditioning Stimulus -Response
  • 2.
    Defining Learning inthe light of Classical Conditioning Theory • Learning is an observable change of performance through acquiring a set of new habits involving the mechanism of stimulus and response. • In a foreign language situation , learners are faced with interference from the L1 or the mother tongue , which is inevitable. • This interference can be an obstacle to effective communication in the target language.
  • 3.
    Different view ofL1 interference • Netwark (1996) , suggests that L1 does not really interfere but learners fall back to the mother tongue , when there is lack in the knowledge of the target language . • Another aspect of conditioning is rewarding. • Conclusion: • In the behaviourist view all learning results automatically and mechanically from stimulus and response. • Notice: • When does a foreign language learner or a second language learner revert to his mother tongue? Even if he is efficent in the target language ?!
  • 4.
    CREATIVE LEARNING • Thisview sees Language more than habit formation . • Learners bring to the situation their own creative abilities : • They compare and contrast.. • They make analogies. • They are interactive and influential. • They are conscious of at least a part of the learning processes.
  • 5.
    A comparison betweenAdult and Children in ESL /EFL • Adults can never be as good as children learning a language. • Adults have to work at learning a language. • An adult can reason more effectively. • In vocabulary and grammar , an adult performs more correctly. • Children are good language learners. • It is said that children do not. • On theother hand, a child cannot. • A child pronouces better. • A child cannot get to the adult level in the foreign language.
  • 6.
    • It isthe meaning of words and sentences which is crucial to language learning. • Language cannot be learned without the situation of a meaningful use. • The nature of Language is within the bounds of grammaticality. The meaningful use of Language