SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
In the Beginning, there was
RICHARD IAN MARK T. NECOSIA
PA 202 | 1ST SEMESTER, SY 2017-2018
JAMES WATT STEAM ENGINE
INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
FACTORY SYSTEM
• CAPITALIST
• UNSKILLED LABOR
• ECONOMIES OF
SALE
• STANDARDIZATION
AND UNIFORMITY
• GUARANTEE OF
SUPPLY
FREDERICK W. TAYLOR
“In the past the man has
been first; in the future
the system must be
first…The first object of
any good system must be
that of developing first
class men.”
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1.Traced the history of scientific
management
2.Discussed the tenets and principles of
scientific management
3.Evaluated the principles of scientific
management in relation to its
applicability in modern day
management.
4.Critiqued scientific management as a
theory in organization and behavior
ACTIVITY
1.Activity: Situational Analysis. The
class will be divided into four
groups.
2. The group has to decide which is
the best option in each of the four
situations. After 5-10 minutes, each
group will choose a representative
to explain their answers.
BIOGRAPHY of F.W. TAYLOR
Frederick Winslow
Taylor
BIOGRAPHY of F.W. TAYLOR
BIOGRAPHY of F.W. TAYLOR
PUBLISHED WORKS of F.W. TAYLOR
1.PIECE RATE
In this article, Taylor suggested changing wage system
in order to motivate the ones who work harder.
PUBLISHED WORKS of F.W. TAYLOR
2. SHOP MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY: emphasized the
necessity of high wage and low cost per unit, and therefore
the manager-workman/workwoman collaboration in the
selection and training of the personnel in compliance with
scientific methods
PUBLISHED WORKS of F.W. TAYLOR
3. PRINCIPLES OF
SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
By optimizing and simplifying
jobs, productivity would increase
PUBLISHED WORKS of F.W. TAYLOR
PUBLISHED WORKS of F.W. TAYLOR
3. PRINCIPLES OF
SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
The quality of a working place is
determined by the quality of its
employees to a great extent.
Principles of Scientific Management
workers and managers needed to cooperate with one another
PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
I – SCIENCE NOT RULE OF THUMB
II – THE DEVELOPMENT OF EACH MAN TO HIS
GREATEST EFFICIENCY AND PROFICIENCY
III – COOPERATION NOT INDIVIDUALISM
IV – DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN MANAGER
AND WORKERS
I – SCIENCE NOT RULE OF THUMB
Replace working by
"rule of thumb," or
simple habit and
common sense, and
instead use the
scientific method to
study work and
determine the most
efficient way to perform
specific tasks.
II – THE DEVELOPMENT OF EACH MAN TO HIS
GREATEST EFFICIENCY AND PROFICIENCY
Rather than simply
assign workers to just
any job, match
workers to their jobs
based on capability
and motivation, and
train them to work at
maximum efficiency
III – COOPERATION NOT INDIVIDUALISM
Monitor worker
performance, and
provide instructions
and supervision to
ensure that they're
using the most
efficient ways of
working as a UNIT.
IV – DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN MANAGER
AND WORKERS
Allocate the work
between managers
and workers so that
the managers spend
their time planning
and training, allowing
the workers to
perform their tasks
efficiently.
ADAPTATIONS OF
TAYLORISM
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
TASK ALLOCATION
Task allocation is
the concept that
breaking task into
smaller and smaller
tasks allows the
determination of the
optimum solution to
the task
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
EXPLOITATION OF
WORKERS
Taylor's Scientific Management put
unnecessary pressures on the
employees to perform the work
faster. Importance was given to
productivity and profitability. This
resulted in exploitation of the
employees. Therefore, many
employees joined trade unions. This
also resulted in mistrust between
management and employees
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
Problem of Unity of Command
Taylor used functional foremanship. So, the workers have to report to
eight bosses. This breaks the principle of unity of command, where the
workers have to report to only one boss. Lack of unity of command can
create confusion and chaos in the organisation
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
Mechanical Approach
Taylor's approach was a mechanical approach. He gave too much
importance to efficiency. He did not consider the human element. Taylor
considered workers as robots, which could speed up the work at any cost.
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
Problem of
Separation of
Planning
from Doing
Taylor said to separate
planning from doing. In
reality, we cannot
separate planning from
doing. The planners
should also be engaged
in doing, then only they
will be able to make
realistic plans for the
organisation
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
Individualistic Approach
Taylor's scientific management gives too much importance
to individual performance and not to group performance.
However, the success of an organisation depends not only
on individual performance of workers, but also on group
performance of workers
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
Wrong Assumptions
Taylor assumed that
workers are motivated only
by financial gains.
However, in reality, workers
are motivated not financial
incentives but also by
social needs and personal
egos.
CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
FROM THE EMPLOYER
1. EXPENSIVE
2. TIME CONSUMING
3. DETERIORATION OF
QUALITY
SALAMAT TUNGKAY! :D
REFERENCES
Frederick W. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management (New York: Harper Bros.,
1911): 5- 29
Turan, H. (2015). Taylor’s “Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues
in Personnel Selection Period. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3,
11.
http://www.eldritchpress.org/fwt/taylor.html
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_Taylor.htm
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fords-assembly-line-starts-rolling
http://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/taylor.asp
http://www.managementstudyguide.com/criticism_scientificmanagement.htm

Scientific management

  • 1.
    SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT In theBeginning, there was RICHARD IAN MARK T. NECOSIA PA 202 | 1ST SEMESTER, SY 2017-2018
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    FACTORY SYSTEM • CAPITALIST •UNSKILLED LABOR • ECONOMIES OF SALE • STANDARDIZATION AND UNIFORMITY • GUARANTEE OF SUPPLY
  • 5.
    FREDERICK W. TAYLOR “Inthe past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first…The first object of any good system must be that of developing first class men.”
  • 6.
    LEARNING OUTCOMES 1.Traced thehistory of scientific management 2.Discussed the tenets and principles of scientific management 3.Evaluated the principles of scientific management in relation to its applicability in modern day management. 4.Critiqued scientific management as a theory in organization and behavior
  • 7.
    ACTIVITY 1.Activity: Situational Analysis.The class will be divided into four groups. 2. The group has to decide which is the best option in each of the four situations. After 5-10 minutes, each group will choose a representative to explain their answers.
  • 8.
    BIOGRAPHY of F.W.TAYLOR Frederick Winslow Taylor
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    PUBLISHED WORKS ofF.W. TAYLOR 1.PIECE RATE In this article, Taylor suggested changing wage system in order to motivate the ones who work harder.
  • 12.
    PUBLISHED WORKS ofF.W. TAYLOR 2. SHOP MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY: emphasized the necessity of high wage and low cost per unit, and therefore the manager-workman/workwoman collaboration in the selection and training of the personnel in compliance with scientific methods
  • 13.
    PUBLISHED WORKS ofF.W. TAYLOR 3. PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT By optimizing and simplifying jobs, productivity would increase
  • 14.
    PUBLISHED WORKS ofF.W. TAYLOR
  • 15.
    PUBLISHED WORKS ofF.W. TAYLOR 3. PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT The quality of a working place is determined by the quality of its employees to a great extent.
  • 16.
    Principles of ScientificManagement workers and managers needed to cooperate with one another
  • 17.
    PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT I – SCIENCE NOT RULE OF THUMB II – THE DEVELOPMENT OF EACH MAN TO HIS GREATEST EFFICIENCY AND PROFICIENCY III – COOPERATION NOT INDIVIDUALISM IV – DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN MANAGER AND WORKERS
  • 18.
    I – SCIENCENOT RULE OF THUMB Replace working by "rule of thumb," or simple habit and common sense, and instead use the scientific method to study work and determine the most efficient way to perform specific tasks.
  • 19.
    II – THEDEVELOPMENT OF EACH MAN TO HIS GREATEST EFFICIENCY AND PROFICIENCY Rather than simply assign workers to just any job, match workers to their jobs based on capability and motivation, and train them to work at maximum efficiency
  • 20.
    III – COOPERATIONNOT INDIVIDUALISM Monitor worker performance, and provide instructions and supervision to ensure that they're using the most efficient ways of working as a UNIT.
  • 21.
    IV – DIVISIONOF LABOR BETWEEN MANAGER AND WORKERS Allocate the work between managers and workers so that the managers spend their time planning and training, allowing the workers to perform their tasks efficiently.
  • 22.
  • 27.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT TASK ALLOCATION Task allocation is the concept that breaking task into smaller and smaller tasks allows the determination of the optimum solution to the task
  • 28.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT EXPLOITATION OF WORKERS Taylor's Scientific Management put unnecessary pressures on the employees to perform the work faster. Importance was given to productivity and profitability. This resulted in exploitation of the employees. Therefore, many employees joined trade unions. This also resulted in mistrust between management and employees
  • 29.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT Problem of Unity of Command Taylor used functional foremanship. So, the workers have to report to eight bosses. This breaks the principle of unity of command, where the workers have to report to only one boss. Lack of unity of command can create confusion and chaos in the organisation
  • 30.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT Mechanical Approach Taylor's approach was a mechanical approach. He gave too much importance to efficiency. He did not consider the human element. Taylor considered workers as robots, which could speed up the work at any cost.
  • 31.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT Problem of Separation of Planning from Doing Taylor said to separate planning from doing. In reality, we cannot separate planning from doing. The planners should also be engaged in doing, then only they will be able to make realistic plans for the organisation
  • 32.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT Individualistic Approach Taylor's scientific management gives too much importance to individual performance and not to group performance. However, the success of an organisation depends not only on individual performance of workers, but also on group performance of workers
  • 33.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT Wrong Assumptions Taylor assumed that workers are motivated only by financial gains. However, in reality, workers are motivated not financial incentives but also by social needs and personal egos.
  • 34.
    CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT FROM THE EMPLOYER 1. EXPENSIVE 2. TIME CONSUMING 3. DETERIORATION OF QUALITY
  • 35.
  • 36.
    REFERENCES Frederick W. Taylor,The Principles of Scientific Management (New York: Harper Bros., 1911): 5- 29 Turan, H. (2015). Taylor’s “Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues in Personnel Selection Period. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3, 11. http://www.eldritchpress.org/fwt/taylor.html https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_Taylor.htm http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fords-assembly-line-starts-rolling http://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/taylor.asp http://www.managementstudyguide.com/criticism_scientificmanagement.htm