This document provides information about an upcoming 6th grade science fair project for students. It outlines the scientific process that students must follow, including developing a question, conducting research, forming a hypothesis, experimentation, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting conclusions. It also lists specific due dates for different project components and restrictions on project topics. The document aims to clearly communicate the requirements and timeline for the 6th grade science fair projects.
This document provides instructions for writing a formal laboratory report. It discusses the typical elements of a lab report including the title, statement of problem, hypothesis, methodology, data, results, and conclusion. Students are guided to write a sample lab report for a grassland biodiversity experiment by developing each section, such as writing a hypothesis based on background information and designing a data table and graph. Following a standardized format and including all required elements will help students earn a good grade on their formal lab report.
This document provides information about science fair projects for students. It discusses that science fair projects involve asking a scientific question and conducting an experiment to answer it. The process teaches students real-world skills like critical thinking, organization, and presentation abilities. Successful science fair projects require partnership between students, teachers, and parents. Students must follow the scientific method, which includes asking a question, researching background information, developing a hypothesis, experimentation, analyzing data, and drawing a conclusion. The document outlines the categories of projects, tips for choosing good topics, and important dates for upcoming science fairs.
This document provides guidance for students participating in a science fair. It outlines 10 key steps: 1) choosing an interesting topic, 2) keeping a detailed log book, 3) researching the topic in depth, 4) forming a clear key question, 5) making a hypothesis, 6) designing an experiment with variables, 7) recording organized results, 8) analyzing patterns in the results, 9) drawing a conclusion that answers the original question, and 10) evaluating the investigation and considering applications and further research. Repeating experiments, displaying results clearly, and thoroughly answering the original question are emphasized.
This document provides guidance for a lesson on doing science. It discusses key concepts like scientific questions being answered through descriptive or experimental research. Models are used to test difficult ideas by saving time and money. A hypothesis is an idea that can be tested, and sometimes experiments disprove the original hypothesis, requiring a new one. Well-planned experiments have a control and vary only one factor at a time. Careful organization and planning are important when solving any problem scientifically. The lesson covers solving problems through scientific methods, using equipment and models, drawing conclusions, and experimental research design.
The document provides guidance on writing science lab reports for both workplace and educational audiences. While workplace audiences are more interested in results, educators want more detailed explanations to ensure students understand experiments. Both value objectivity, precision, accuracy and carefully drawn conclusions based on sufficient data presented clearly using visuals like tables and graphs. Lab reports should answer what the purpose was, what materials and procedures were used, what the results were, and what conclusions were drawn.
Introduction to Science 3.2 : Scientific MethodsChris Foltz
Scientific methods involve asking questions, making observations, forming hypotheses, testing predictions, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. An example is provided of engineers Czarnowski and Triantafyllou who studied boat propulsion efficiency. They observed penguins' swimming motion, hypothesized a penguin-inspired propulsion system would be more efficient than propellers, built and tested a model "Proteus", analyzed test data showing Proteus was more efficient, and concluded their hypothesis was supported. They communicated their results in academic papers and online.
Science is the process of gaining knowledge through scientific inquiry, which involves posing questions, developing hypotheses, designing experiments, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating results. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation that can be tested, while a scientific theory is a well-supported explanation that has withstood repeated testing but may later be modified or abandoned if evidence does not support it. Scientific laws describe observable patterns or relationships but do not explain why something occurs.
The scientific method refers to the basic steps scientists use to solve problems: determine the problem, gather research, form a hypothesis, carry out an experiment, record and analyze results, and draw a conclusion. It involves asking a testable question, researching background information, making a hypothesis, designing an experiment with controls and variables, collecting and analyzing data, and determining whether the hypothesis was supported or needs to be revised. The scientific method is used to systematically investigate phenomena and acquire knowledge.
This document provides instructions for writing a formal laboratory report. It discusses the typical elements of a lab report including the title, statement of problem, hypothesis, methodology, data, results, and conclusion. Students are guided to write a sample lab report for a grassland biodiversity experiment by developing each section, such as writing a hypothesis based on background information and designing a data table and graph. Following a standardized format and including all required elements will help students earn a good grade on their formal lab report.
This document provides information about science fair projects for students. It discusses that science fair projects involve asking a scientific question and conducting an experiment to answer it. The process teaches students real-world skills like critical thinking, organization, and presentation abilities. Successful science fair projects require partnership between students, teachers, and parents. Students must follow the scientific method, which includes asking a question, researching background information, developing a hypothesis, experimentation, analyzing data, and drawing a conclusion. The document outlines the categories of projects, tips for choosing good topics, and important dates for upcoming science fairs.
This document provides guidance for students participating in a science fair. It outlines 10 key steps: 1) choosing an interesting topic, 2) keeping a detailed log book, 3) researching the topic in depth, 4) forming a clear key question, 5) making a hypothesis, 6) designing an experiment with variables, 7) recording organized results, 8) analyzing patterns in the results, 9) drawing a conclusion that answers the original question, and 10) evaluating the investigation and considering applications and further research. Repeating experiments, displaying results clearly, and thoroughly answering the original question are emphasized.
This document provides guidance for a lesson on doing science. It discusses key concepts like scientific questions being answered through descriptive or experimental research. Models are used to test difficult ideas by saving time and money. A hypothesis is an idea that can be tested, and sometimes experiments disprove the original hypothesis, requiring a new one. Well-planned experiments have a control and vary only one factor at a time. Careful organization and planning are important when solving any problem scientifically. The lesson covers solving problems through scientific methods, using equipment and models, drawing conclusions, and experimental research design.
The document provides guidance on writing science lab reports for both workplace and educational audiences. While workplace audiences are more interested in results, educators want more detailed explanations to ensure students understand experiments. Both value objectivity, precision, accuracy and carefully drawn conclusions based on sufficient data presented clearly using visuals like tables and graphs. Lab reports should answer what the purpose was, what materials and procedures were used, what the results were, and what conclusions were drawn.
Introduction to Science 3.2 : Scientific MethodsChris Foltz
Scientific methods involve asking questions, making observations, forming hypotheses, testing predictions, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. An example is provided of engineers Czarnowski and Triantafyllou who studied boat propulsion efficiency. They observed penguins' swimming motion, hypothesized a penguin-inspired propulsion system would be more efficient than propellers, built and tested a model "Proteus", analyzed test data showing Proteus was more efficient, and concluded their hypothesis was supported. They communicated their results in academic papers and online.
Science is the process of gaining knowledge through scientific inquiry, which involves posing questions, developing hypotheses, designing experiments, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating results. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation that can be tested, while a scientific theory is a well-supported explanation that has withstood repeated testing but may later be modified or abandoned if evidence does not support it. Scientific laws describe observable patterns or relationships but do not explain why something occurs.
The scientific method refers to the basic steps scientists use to solve problems: determine the problem, gather research, form a hypothesis, carry out an experiment, record and analyze results, and draw a conclusion. It involves asking a testable question, researching background information, making a hypothesis, designing an experiment with controls and variables, collecting and analyzing data, and determining whether the hypothesis was supported or needs to be revised. The scientific method is used to systematically investigate phenomena and acquire knowledge.
The document outlines the key steps of the scientific method: observation, hypothesis, experiment, and conclusion. It discusses performing experiments, including developing procedures, collecting data, and analyzing results to determine if the hypothesis is supported or needs revision. Potential sources of bias are addressed, as well as the importance of collaboration and replication in scientific research. Safety protocols for the laboratory are also covered.
The document provides information about science and the scientific method. It defines science as the systematic observation of natural events to discover facts and form laws and principles. Science aims to collect facts through observation and experiments in order to understand the natural world. The scientific method is the process used by scientists to explore observations and answer questions through experiments and hypothesis testing. It involves asking a question, researching background information, constructing a hypothesis, experimentation, analyzing data, and communicating results.
The document discusses the scientific method and nature of scientific inquiry. It outlines the key steps of the scientific method which include making observations, developing a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experiments, and analyzing the results. It also discusses developing a question, forming predictions, using a control, collecting quantitative data, and repeating experiments. The document notes that science uses a logical problem solving approach and hypotheses must be testable rather than opinions or beliefs. It discusses the meaning of scientific theories and limits of science.
Get materials for class such as sharpened pencils. Hand in homework that is due and begin bell work. Review class rules about respecting others, raising your hand to speak, cell phone use, where to sit, needing a pass to leave, no food or drink in lab areas. Scientific method is used to solve problems through making observations, asking questions, forming hypotheses, testing with experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions to support or revise hypotheses and develop theories.
This document provides information about science experiments, including the scientific method, variables, controls, hypotheses, procedures, data collection, analysis, and conclusions. It discusses key parts of an experiment like the independent and dependent variables, controls, developing hypotheses, designing procedures, collecting objective versus subjective data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions. Examples are provided to illustrate these scientific experiment concepts.
This document provides an overview of the scientific method process, including:
1) Observation and forming a testable question, which should have one variable and measurable outcomes.
2) Developing a hypothesis in an "if...then...because" format to make an educated guess about what will happen during the experiment.
3) Designing and performing an experiment to test the hypothesis by manipulating the variable and collecting objective data.
4) Analyzing the results to determine if the hypothesis was supported or needs revising, and drawing a conclusion.
The document outlines the key steps of the scientific method including observation, hypothesis, experiment, and conclusion. It emphasizes the importance of recording specific procedures so experiments can be performed by others. The conclusion should state whether the data supports or contradicts the original hypothesis. Errors should be noted to improve future experiments, and plans for further investigation should be proposed.
The document outlines various skills needed for scientific inquiry, including:
1) Identifying questions that can be answered through investigation, designing and conducting investigations, and using appropriate techniques to gather and analyze data.
2) Developing descriptions, explanations, and models using evidence, and thinking critically about relationships between evidence and explanations.
3) Recognizing and analyzing alternative explanations, and communicating procedures and explanations.
This document provides an overview of the scientific method. It explains that science is the process of observing natural events to discover facts and form principles that can be tested. The scientific method is then described as the step-by-step process scientists use to answer questions, which includes asking a question, researching, forming a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experimentation, gathering data, analyzing results, drawing conclusions, and communicating results. Each step of the scientific method is then defined in more detail.
This document provides instructions for an experiment to test whether eggs can float in water with added salt. The scientific method is followed, beginning with making observations and forming a hypothesis that eggs will float if enough salt is dissolved in water. Materials are listed and procedures described for conducting trials adding increasing amounts of salt to water and recording if the egg sinks or floats. Data is organized in a table and graph showing that eggs begin to float when salt reaches 25-30 ml added to 300 ml water. The conclusion supports the hypothesis and results are shared with the class.
This document provides guidance on how to read scientific papers. It explains that there are two main types of scientific papers: review articles and primary research articles. Review articles summarize previous studies in a field, while primary research articles present original experimental data and conclusions. The key sections of primary research articles are outlined, including the abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Reading scientific papers is important for students conducting independent research, as it allows them to learn what is already known in a field, understand how experiments are performed, and get ideas for their own research projects.
This document discusses key aspects of scientific inquiry including conclusions and presentations. It provides examples of scientific facts, theories, and laws. Facts are objective observations that can be verified, theories are explanations for how natural phenomena work that can be observed and tested, and laws are descriptions of observable phenomena that always apply under the same conditions. The document also addresses forming hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and sharing findings.
How to plan and conduct hypotheis based science projects for A/L school project.
The project can be presented to National Science and Engineering Fair or to Google Science fair projects
The document provides requirements and guidelines for a science fair project. It outlines that students must submit: 1) a logbook with dated records of their work, 2) a display board summarizing their project, 3) an abstract, and 4) any models or visual aids. The logbook must be organized into sections including background research, scientific method, raw data, findings and conclusions. The display board should visually showcase the title, problem, hypothesis, procedures, data and conclusions. Important due dates for submitting project components are also provided.
This document provides guidance on how to write a research paper by outlining the standard format and key sections. The standard format includes a title, authors, introduction, materials and methods, results (with tables and/or figures), discussion, acknowledgments, and references. The introduction should summarize relevant literature and state the research question. The materials and methods section should provide enough detail for others to replicate the experiment. Results are presented factually without interpretation. The discussion section relates results to the research question, indicates whether hypotheses were supported, and discusses relevance and implications.
The document outlines the six key parts of a lab report: Problem, Background, Data, Analysis, Conclusion, and References. It provides guidance on what to include in each section, such as stating the hypothesis in the Problem section, defining relevant biology in the Background, presenting data in tables with titles and units in the Data section, analyzing the data in relation to the hypothesis and background in the Analysis, and summarizing results and implications in the Conclusion. All observations and data still belong in the separate lab book.
This document provides guidelines for the standard format of a lab report, which should contain six main sections: Problem, Background, Data, Analysis, Conclusion, and References. The Purpose of the lab report is to explain science investigations and results to others. All raw data, notes, and observations from the lab are to be recorded in a separate lab book. The Problem section states the reason for the lab experiment. The Background provides relevant scientific context. Data is presented in neat tables with titles and units. Graphs are drawn on separate graph paper. Analysis uses the data to evaluate results in relation to the problem or hypothesis. The Conclusion states numerical findings and their implications. References are cited using a standard format.
1. The results section should objectively report the findings from the research in a concise manner using figures, tables and text.
2. Key results should be highlighted and described in the context of the questions asked. Control experiments and non-table/figure findings can also be reported.
3. Data should be analyzed and presented in a clear format without interpretation, and the same data should not be presented twice.
1. The results section should objectively report the findings from the research in text, figures, and tables without interpreting or explaining the results.
2. Figures and tables should complement the text and not repeat the same information. Each figure and table needs a number, caption/title, and should be able to stand on its own.
3. The discussion section provides an interpretation of the results and supports any conclusions drawn, using evidence from the experiment and existing knowledge, and explains the significance and implications of the findings.
The document discusses the scientific method and provides steps to follow for a science fair project. It explains that the scientific method involves asking a question and developing a hypothesis to test through experimentation. It notes that not all areas of science can be directly experimented on. The steps provided are: 1) Ask a question 2) Do background research 3) Construct a hypothesis 4) Test the hypothesis through experimentation 5) Analyze data and draw a conclusion 6) Communicate results. It also discusses elements of an effective research proposal such as background, problem statement, objectives, significance, limitations, definitions, literature review, and methodology. Finally, it discusses computer search as an important data collection method for distant learners due to access to vast
This document provides guidance on writing lab reports or research reports. It outlines the typical sections of a scientific report which include an abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, tables and figures, and references. The introduction presents background information and the purpose/hypothesis. The materials and methods section describes the experimental procedures. The results section reports the findings without interpretation. The discussion section analyzes and interprets the results in relation to previous research. Tables and figures are used to visually present data.
This document provides a grading rubric for lab reports with criteria in 5 areas: introduction, methods, results, discussion/conclusion, and writing mechanics. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more complete and accurate components that clearly communicate the experimental process and outcomes. The rubric provides descriptions of the qualities expected for basic (C-range), proficient (B-range), and exemplary (A-range) performance in each area.
The document outlines the key steps of the scientific method: observation, hypothesis, experiment, and conclusion. It discusses performing experiments, including developing procedures, collecting data, and analyzing results to determine if the hypothesis is supported or needs revision. Potential sources of bias are addressed, as well as the importance of collaboration and replication in scientific research. Safety protocols for the laboratory are also covered.
The document provides information about science and the scientific method. It defines science as the systematic observation of natural events to discover facts and form laws and principles. Science aims to collect facts through observation and experiments in order to understand the natural world. The scientific method is the process used by scientists to explore observations and answer questions through experiments and hypothesis testing. It involves asking a question, researching background information, constructing a hypothesis, experimentation, analyzing data, and communicating results.
The document discusses the scientific method and nature of scientific inquiry. It outlines the key steps of the scientific method which include making observations, developing a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experiments, and analyzing the results. It also discusses developing a question, forming predictions, using a control, collecting quantitative data, and repeating experiments. The document notes that science uses a logical problem solving approach and hypotheses must be testable rather than opinions or beliefs. It discusses the meaning of scientific theories and limits of science.
Get materials for class such as sharpened pencils. Hand in homework that is due and begin bell work. Review class rules about respecting others, raising your hand to speak, cell phone use, where to sit, needing a pass to leave, no food or drink in lab areas. Scientific method is used to solve problems through making observations, asking questions, forming hypotheses, testing with experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions to support or revise hypotheses and develop theories.
This document provides information about science experiments, including the scientific method, variables, controls, hypotheses, procedures, data collection, analysis, and conclusions. It discusses key parts of an experiment like the independent and dependent variables, controls, developing hypotheses, designing procedures, collecting objective versus subjective data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions. Examples are provided to illustrate these scientific experiment concepts.
This document provides an overview of the scientific method process, including:
1) Observation and forming a testable question, which should have one variable and measurable outcomes.
2) Developing a hypothesis in an "if...then...because" format to make an educated guess about what will happen during the experiment.
3) Designing and performing an experiment to test the hypothesis by manipulating the variable and collecting objective data.
4) Analyzing the results to determine if the hypothesis was supported or needs revising, and drawing a conclusion.
The document outlines the key steps of the scientific method including observation, hypothesis, experiment, and conclusion. It emphasizes the importance of recording specific procedures so experiments can be performed by others. The conclusion should state whether the data supports or contradicts the original hypothesis. Errors should be noted to improve future experiments, and plans for further investigation should be proposed.
The document outlines various skills needed for scientific inquiry, including:
1) Identifying questions that can be answered through investigation, designing and conducting investigations, and using appropriate techniques to gather and analyze data.
2) Developing descriptions, explanations, and models using evidence, and thinking critically about relationships between evidence and explanations.
3) Recognizing and analyzing alternative explanations, and communicating procedures and explanations.
This document provides an overview of the scientific method. It explains that science is the process of observing natural events to discover facts and form principles that can be tested. The scientific method is then described as the step-by-step process scientists use to answer questions, which includes asking a question, researching, forming a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experimentation, gathering data, analyzing results, drawing conclusions, and communicating results. Each step of the scientific method is then defined in more detail.
This document provides instructions for an experiment to test whether eggs can float in water with added salt. The scientific method is followed, beginning with making observations and forming a hypothesis that eggs will float if enough salt is dissolved in water. Materials are listed and procedures described for conducting trials adding increasing amounts of salt to water and recording if the egg sinks or floats. Data is organized in a table and graph showing that eggs begin to float when salt reaches 25-30 ml added to 300 ml water. The conclusion supports the hypothesis and results are shared with the class.
This document provides guidance on how to read scientific papers. It explains that there are two main types of scientific papers: review articles and primary research articles. Review articles summarize previous studies in a field, while primary research articles present original experimental data and conclusions. The key sections of primary research articles are outlined, including the abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Reading scientific papers is important for students conducting independent research, as it allows them to learn what is already known in a field, understand how experiments are performed, and get ideas for their own research projects.
This document discusses key aspects of scientific inquiry including conclusions and presentations. It provides examples of scientific facts, theories, and laws. Facts are objective observations that can be verified, theories are explanations for how natural phenomena work that can be observed and tested, and laws are descriptions of observable phenomena that always apply under the same conditions. The document also addresses forming hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and sharing findings.
How to plan and conduct hypotheis based science projects for A/L school project.
The project can be presented to National Science and Engineering Fair or to Google Science fair projects
The document provides requirements and guidelines for a science fair project. It outlines that students must submit: 1) a logbook with dated records of their work, 2) a display board summarizing their project, 3) an abstract, and 4) any models or visual aids. The logbook must be organized into sections including background research, scientific method, raw data, findings and conclusions. The display board should visually showcase the title, problem, hypothesis, procedures, data and conclusions. Important due dates for submitting project components are also provided.
This document provides guidance on how to write a research paper by outlining the standard format and key sections. The standard format includes a title, authors, introduction, materials and methods, results (with tables and/or figures), discussion, acknowledgments, and references. The introduction should summarize relevant literature and state the research question. The materials and methods section should provide enough detail for others to replicate the experiment. Results are presented factually without interpretation. The discussion section relates results to the research question, indicates whether hypotheses were supported, and discusses relevance and implications.
The document outlines the six key parts of a lab report: Problem, Background, Data, Analysis, Conclusion, and References. It provides guidance on what to include in each section, such as stating the hypothesis in the Problem section, defining relevant biology in the Background, presenting data in tables with titles and units in the Data section, analyzing the data in relation to the hypothesis and background in the Analysis, and summarizing results and implications in the Conclusion. All observations and data still belong in the separate lab book.
This document provides guidelines for the standard format of a lab report, which should contain six main sections: Problem, Background, Data, Analysis, Conclusion, and References. The Purpose of the lab report is to explain science investigations and results to others. All raw data, notes, and observations from the lab are to be recorded in a separate lab book. The Problem section states the reason for the lab experiment. The Background provides relevant scientific context. Data is presented in neat tables with titles and units. Graphs are drawn on separate graph paper. Analysis uses the data to evaluate results in relation to the problem or hypothesis. The Conclusion states numerical findings and their implications. References are cited using a standard format.
1. The results section should objectively report the findings from the research in a concise manner using figures, tables and text.
2. Key results should be highlighted and described in the context of the questions asked. Control experiments and non-table/figure findings can also be reported.
3. Data should be analyzed and presented in a clear format without interpretation, and the same data should not be presented twice.
1. The results section should objectively report the findings from the research in text, figures, and tables without interpreting or explaining the results.
2. Figures and tables should complement the text and not repeat the same information. Each figure and table needs a number, caption/title, and should be able to stand on its own.
3. The discussion section provides an interpretation of the results and supports any conclusions drawn, using evidence from the experiment and existing knowledge, and explains the significance and implications of the findings.
The document discusses the scientific method and provides steps to follow for a science fair project. It explains that the scientific method involves asking a question and developing a hypothesis to test through experimentation. It notes that not all areas of science can be directly experimented on. The steps provided are: 1) Ask a question 2) Do background research 3) Construct a hypothesis 4) Test the hypothesis through experimentation 5) Analyze data and draw a conclusion 6) Communicate results. It also discusses elements of an effective research proposal such as background, problem statement, objectives, significance, limitations, definitions, literature review, and methodology. Finally, it discusses computer search as an important data collection method for distant learners due to access to vast
This document provides guidance on writing lab reports or research reports. It outlines the typical sections of a scientific report which include an abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, tables and figures, and references. The introduction presents background information and the purpose/hypothesis. The materials and methods section describes the experimental procedures. The results section reports the findings without interpretation. The discussion section analyzes and interprets the results in relation to previous research. Tables and figures are used to visually present data.
This document provides a grading rubric for lab reports with criteria in 5 areas: introduction, methods, results, discussion/conclusion, and writing mechanics. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more complete and accurate components that clearly communicate the experimental process and outcomes. The rubric provides descriptions of the qualities expected for basic (C-range), proficient (B-range), and exemplary (A-range) performance in each area.
This document discusses research methods and the scientific method. It defines research as systematic work undertaken to increase knowledge. The scientific method involves making an observation, forming a hypothesis, conducting an experiment, analyzing results, and presenting findings. The key steps of the scientific method are asking a question, conducting background research, establishing a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis with an experiment, making observations, analyzing results, and presenting conclusions. Research methods and the scientific method provide structured and objective ways to gather and evaluate information.
The document outlines the key steps of the scientific method including making observations and inferences, asking a research question, forming a hypothesis, designing and conducting a controlled experiment, collecting and analyzing data, drawing a conclusion, and subjecting findings to peer review. It provides examples and definitions for each step and explains what makes an experiment valid and trusted according to scientific standards.
This document outlines the key sections and content that should be included in a lab report. It discusses including an informative title, abstract, introduction with purpose and hypothesis, detailed methods section, results with organized data, and a conclusion discussing whether the hypothesis was supported and improvements for the experiment. The lab report provides a clear and detailed analysis of the procedures, data, and findings of an experiment.
This document provides instructions and information about the scientific method. It outlines the basic steps of the scientific method which include: purpose/problem, research, hypothesis, experiment, analyze data, and conclusion. It defines key terms like independent and dependent variables, constants, and controls. Examples are provided to identify the different variables, constants, and controls. Detailed guidance is given for how to design a controlled experiment, collect and analyze data, and write a conclusion that discusses whether the hypothesis was supported and how the experiment could be improved.
The document provides guidance for creating a scientific poster presentation. It includes templates for the typical sections of an introduction, materials and methods, results, and conclusions. Key points emphasized are keeping word counts low, using visual elements like figures and illustrations over dense text, and ensuring figures are large and legible from a distance. The overall goal is to concisely communicate the essential information and findings of a scientific study or experiment.
Presentation created by Central District Resource Teacher, Rampal Singh for grade 2 teachers, May 2010. Outlines how teachers can incorporate inquiry into science instruction.
IMRAD format
An acronym for Introduction – Method – Results – and – Discussion. The IMRaD format is a way of structuring a scientific article. It is often used in health care and the natural sciences. Unlike theses in the social sciences, the IMRaD format does not include a separate theory chapter
The scientific method is a process used by scientists to explore observations and answer questions through experimentation. It involves asking a question, researching background information, proposing a hypothesis to predict the outcome of an experiment, designing and conducting an experiment to test the hypothesis, analyzing the experimental data, and communicating the results. The goal is to discover cause-and-effect relationships and determine if all available evidence can provide a logical answer to the original question. Understanding and following the basic steps of the scientific method helps focus an investigation and work through observations and data to reach the best possible conclusion.
The 10 step document outlines the process for conducting a science project, including:
1) Browsing literature to find an idea and formulate questions.
2) Making a list of topic ideas and determining the hypothesis.
3) Identifying existing data that raises questions.
4) Searching additional literature and designing experiments to test the hypothesis.
5) Stating the hypothesis as a testable statement of cause and effect.
This document discusses and compares quantitative and qualitative research methods. Quantitative research uses scientifically collected and statistically analyzed numerical data from large sample sizes to investigate observable phenomena in an objective manner. It aims to generalize results to populations and allows for fast and easy data collection and analysis using tools like surveys, experiments, and statistical tests. In contrast, qualitative research collects descriptive data like words and narratives from smaller samples to explore topics in more depth through interviews and observations.
Characteristics of Quantitative ResearchGeorgePeligro
This document provides information about quantitative research, including its definition, characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and different types. Quantitative research is defined as a systematic process of obtaining numerical data about the world. It has characteristics such as using structured research instruments, large sample sizes, clearly defined research questions, and numerical data presented statistically. The strengths include testing theories, generalizing findings, and establishing cause-and-effect relationships. Weaknesses can include missing local contexts and understandings. The main types of quantitative research discussed are experimental (true, quasi, pre-experimental) and non-experimental (descriptive, correlational, causal-comparative, comparative, evaluative).
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfChart Kalyan
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE VisionDianaGray10
In the first session, we will review the organization's vision and how this has an impact on the COE Structure.
Topics covered:
• The role of a steering committee
• How do the organization’s priorities determine CoE Structure?
Speaker:
Chris Bolin, Senior Intelligent Automation Architect Anika Systems
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providersakankshawande
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
[OReilly Superstream] Occupy the Space: A grassroots guide to engineering (an...Jason Yip
The typical problem in product engineering is not bad strategy, so much as “no strategy”. This leads to confusion, lack of motivation, and incoherent action. The next time you look for a strategy and find an empty space, instead of waiting for it to be filled, I will show you how to fill it in yourself. If you’re wrong, it forces a correction. If you’re right, it helps create focus. I’ll share how I’ve approached this in the past, both what works and lessons for what didn’t work so well.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Jakub Marek
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
"Choosing proper type of scaling", Olena SyrotaFwdays
Imagine an IoT processing system that is already quite mature and production-ready and for which client coverage is growing and scaling and performance aspects are life and death questions. The system has Redis, MongoDB, and stream processing based on ksqldb. In this talk, firstly, we will analyze scaling approaches and then select the proper ones for our system.
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
How information systems are built or acquired puts information, which is what they should be about, in a secondary place. Our language adapted accordingly, and we no longer talk about information systems but applications. Applications evolved in a way to break data into diverse fragments, tightly coupled with applications and expensive to integrate. The result is technical debt, which is re-paid by taking even bigger "loans", resulting in an ever-increasing technical debt. Software engineering and procurement practices work in sync with market forces to maintain this trend. This talk demonstrates how natural this situation is. The question is: can something be done to reverse the trend?
Essentials of Automations: Exploring Attributes & Automation ParametersSafe Software
Building automations in FME Flow can save time, money, and help businesses scale by eliminating data silos and providing data to stakeholders in real-time. One essential component to orchestrating complex automations is the use of attributes & automation parameters (both formerly known as “keys”). In fact, it’s unlikely you’ll ever build an Automation without using these components, but what exactly are they?
Attributes & automation parameters enable the automation author to pass data values from one automation component to the next. During this webinar, our FME Flow Specialists will cover leveraging the three types of these output attributes & parameters in FME Flow: Event, Custom, and Automation. As a bonus, they’ll also be making use of the Split-Merge Block functionality.
You’ll leave this webinar with a better understanding of how to maximize the potential of automations by making use of attributes & automation parameters, with the ultimate goal of setting your enterprise integration workflows up on autopilot.
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionTatiana Kojar
Manage and optimize your license adoption and consumption with SAM4U, an SAP free customer software asset management tool.
SAM4U, an SAP complimentary software asset management tool for customers, delivers a detailed and well-structured overview of license inventory and usage with a user-friendly interface. We offer a hosted, cost-effective, and performance-optimized SAM4U setup in the Skybuffer Cloud environment. You retain ownership of the system and data, while we manage the ABAP 7.58 infrastructure, ensuring fixed Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and exceptional services through the SAP Fiori interface.
Freshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-EfficiencyScyllaDB
Freshworks creates AI-boosted business software that helps employees work more efficiently and effectively. Managing data across multiple RDBMS and NoSQL databases was already a challenge at their current scale. To prepare for 10X growth, they knew it was time to rethink their database strategy. Learn how they architected a solution that would simplify scaling while keeping costs under control.
Connector Corner: Seamlessly power UiPath Apps, GenAI with prebuilt connectorsDianaGray10
Join us to learn how UiPath Apps can directly and easily interact with prebuilt connectors via Integration Service--including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Open GenAI, and more.
The best part is you can achieve this without building a custom workflow! Say goodbye to the hassle of using separate automations to call APIs. By seamlessly integrating within App Studio, you can now easily streamline your workflow, while gaining direct access to our Connector Catalog of popular applications.
We’ll discuss and demo the benefits of UiPath Apps and connectors including:
Creating a compelling user experience for any software, without the limitations of APIs.
Accelerating the app creation process, saving time and effort
Enjoying high-performance CRUD (create, read, update, delete) operations, for
seamless data management.
Speakers:
Russell Alfeche, Technology Leader, RPA at qBotic and UiPath MVP
Charlie Greenberg, host
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
The Microsoft 365 Migration Tutorial For Beginner.pptxoperationspcvita
This presentation will help you understand the power of Microsoft 365. However, we have mentioned every productivity app included in Office 365. Additionally, we have suggested the migration situation related to Office 365 and how we can help you.
You can also read: https://www.systoolsgroup.com/updates/office-365-tenant-to-tenant-migration-step-by-step-complete-guide/
The Microsoft 365 Migration Tutorial For Beginner.pptx
Science fair for website
1. SCiet1te FCllr. PQreFit Meet-It1g
Oct. Sf!; S:3e PM Woods MPR
This project will be a combination of research and experimentation. Your child
must PROVE something and NOT demonstrate it. Your child will go through the
entire scientific process creating a research plan while keeping a journal of the entire
process-from day I.
NO restrided projects will be excepted under any circumstances. No experiments
can be done on using human subjects, vertebrate animals, biological agents (no
blood, teeth, tissue, hair, bacteria, fungi, mold, etc.) or hazardous chemicals,
activities, or devices (anything regulated like chemicals and bleach, controlled
substances, prescription drugs, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, explosives, lasers).
Meetings will be held on Thursdays at 8:05 AM in Room 19 for students interested
in going on to the county science fair. These meetings are not mandatory for 6th
grade students who are completing a project for their teacher.
Below you will find a timeline as to when each part of the project is due for all 6th
grade students along with those interested in going on to the county science fair.
Item Due
Oct. 11 Question / Problem everything must be kept in your journal
Oct. 18 Nothing due--vVork on your research everything must be kept in
your journal
Oct. 25 Bibliography (must have 5 sources) and Hypothesis due--Research
done everything must be kept in your journal
Nov. 01 List of Nlaterials and Procedure due everything must be kept in your
journal
2. Nov. 08 Nothing due-vVork on experiment keeping tables, graphs, drawings,
and/or pictures everything must be kept in your journal
Nov. 15 Nothing due-vVork on experiment keeping tables, graphs, drawings,
and/or pictures everything must be kept in your journal
Nov. 22 Nothing due-Work on experiment keeping tables, graphs, drawings,
and/or pictures everything must be kept in your journal
Nov. 29 Results, Conclusion, and Further Research due everything must be
kept in your journal
Dec. 06 Board due between 8:00 - 8:30 AM in the MPR
6:00 PM MPR Doors open for public viewing
6:20 PM Awards will be given out
Dec. 14 Those going on to the Fresno County science fair-fill out forms in
the LAB at 1:45 PM
Every 6th grade student will be given a detailed packet explaining each of the steps
required above from their teacher. All 4th and 5th grade students must attend the
first meeting in order to obtain the packet. This information will be on the school's
website as well.
Below I have listed two websites for topic ideas; however, there are many websites
that contain great information.
www.usc.edu/CSSF/ www.all-science-fair-projects.com
http://schooI.discoveryeducation.comlsciencefaircentrallGetting-StartedlInvestigation.html
http:UschooI.discoveryeducation.comlsciencefaircentraI!
search-California state science fair or free science fair projects
If you have any questions, you may contact me by email atcreemueller@cusd.com
or by phone at 327-8800. I look forward to working with your children.
NIrs. NIueller
4th Grade Teacher/County Science Fair Advisor
creemuelIer@cusd.com
327-8800
3. Title: The title is almost always centered at the top of the middle of the project board.
1. Question/Problem: This is a short paragraph explaining the main things(s) you were wondering about your
project. It could also tell why you chose this topic and/or why you were wondering about this.
2. Research (including a bibliography): This is a summary of the research/information you found on your
topic. It is usually written in a paragraph format. Your summary tells what key information you found that
explained some of the scientific concepts or helped you to understand your experiment. Sometimes, students
will list words and their definitions (like a vocabulary list) of the words that were new to them. The
bibliography can be included at the end of the research or on the project board itself (this is preferred, but
sometimes there is limited space on the board).
3. Hypothesis: After you've done your research and planned the experiment, you should have an idea of
what you think the answer(s) to your question or problem will be. The hypothesis is a straightforward
statement as to the possible results of your tests.
4. Materials Needed list: This is a complete list of the items you will need for your experiment. It is written
as a list and not in a paragraph format. List exactly how many and/or the size of the items (needing 6 oz cups
and 8 oz cups are two separate items on the list). If you are measuring something over time, you might need a
stopwatch or a clock, as well as the materials needed to measure (gram scale, tape measure, glass measuring
cup, etc).
5. Procedure: The steps, or the procedure, of your experiment can be written in a list format. You might use
a sentence or several sentences to explain each step. List the steps in order as you do them. Someone should
be able to follow these steps and do the experiment exactly as you.
6. Data (tables, graphs, observations, drawings, pictures): It's a good idea to take pictures of your
experiment as you are doing it. Be sure not to get your face(or anyone else's) in the picture (judges should not
recognize you). Be sure to take pictures of the testing every step of the way. The pictures show the judges
how the experiment looked. Put your data into graphs or tables and put these on the board. You may want to
draw a diagram or picture of something relating to your experiment. Every project is different so the types of
pictures, diagrams, and graphs will be different for each person.
7. Results: While testing, you've been recording the data. In this section, you write in sentences what the
data shows. Your sentences will say something like: "Of the 40 students studied, 75% said they preferred the
taste of 7-Up and 22% preferred Sprite. Three percent of the students stated both tasted exactly the same."
Don't forget to report negative results or test failures with your results. Failures are results too. This section
can be in paragraph or "bulleted" form.
4. 8. Conclusion: This section is where you compare your results to your hypothesis. You explain if your
hypothesis was correct and you use the results of your test to support this explanation. You are drawing a
conclusion about your results and if the results are meaningful. If your test did not go as you thought, you
would include some statements as to what you would do differently if you did this test again.
9. Discussion and Further Research: In this section, you analyze your results and how they have meaning to
the world. Now that you know this information (the results and conclusion), how can you use it? You could
also write about what new questions you have about your topic and what you would do for further research.
10. Journal: This is a compilation of the diary/journal that you have kept throughout your experimenting. It
would include dates of meetings, notes from researching and planning, and the data from the actual testing.
Material printed or collected could be kept in back of the journal. This information is put together in a binder
or folder and placed on the table in front of the project board. It is not attached to the board itself.
Acknowledgements: Science projects should be done by students, but often adults help out. If an adult spent
extra time in guiding, monitoring, typing, or mentoring, it could be acknowledged on the board. If an adult
was needed to operate a special tool or apparatus, this should be stated.
Be sure that the student's name or school name do NOT appear
on the board.
5. PROBLEM TiTlE RESULTS
A question that states what the Bold, Large lettering Relates to the experiment. What
project is about happened? Explain your data,
graphs, charts in words.
PROCEDURE
RESEARCH
A step by step description of what
CONCLUSION
Summary of back-ground you did, clear and complete (like a
information recipe) Relates to the hypothesis. Did the
data support the hypothesis or
not? Discuss and compare data to
HYPOTHESIS DATA, GRAPHS, CHARTS, hypothesis
PICTURES
A statement of the projected
outcome Of the data collected
FURTHER RESEARCH
If hypothesis is not supported,
MATERIALS could it be altered?
List everything needed include Ideas for further experiments
weights and numbers of relating to a modified hypothesis
What could you do/change next
time?
Title
.,' CO'I1C·',.·
.
.,, ' IwBl
~; .. D;e 011 Or
~ ..- QClJa.s·
.",~) , .~. 1011
...
- , -,
~
'. , . . . . -
~
:h
I
I
I
I
I
I
6. Format Examples
Books
Format:
Author's last name, first initial. (Publication date). Book title. Additional information. City
of publication: Publishing company.
Examples:
Allen, T. (1974). Vanishing wildlife of North America. Washington, D.C.: National
Geographic Society.
Encyclopedia & Dictionary
Format:
Author's last name, first initial. (Date). Title of Article. Title of Encyclopedia (Volume,
pages). City of publication: Publishing company.
Examples:
Bergmann, P. G. (1993). Relativity. In The new encyclopedia britannica (Vol. 26, pp.
501-508). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Magazine & Newspaper Articles
Format:
Author's last name, first initial. (Publication date). Article title. Periodical title, volume
number(issue number if available), inclusive pages.
Examples:
Harlow, H. F. (1983). Fundamentals for preparing psychology journal articles. Journal of
Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 893-896.
Bibliography Notes
#1
Author: __________________________________________________________
Title: _____________________________________________________
Place of Publication: ________________________________________
Publisher: ______________________________________________
Copyright Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Pages Used: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Article Title :______________________________________________
Volume #:
8. Bibliographic Notes for Internet Use
#1
Author of Site if available (person): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Title of Site: ______________________________
[Online] Available at http:address/file name: _____________________
Date of document or download:
----------------------------------------
#2
Author of Site if available (person): __________________________________
Title of Site:
[Online] Available at http:address/file name:
Date of document or download:
--------------------------------
#3
Author of Site if available (person): _______________________________
Title of Site:
[Online] Available at http:address/file name:
Date of document or download:
----------------------------
Example:
California Historical Society, "The Yokuts". [Online] Available
http://WWlV.californiahistory.net/2_natives/yokuts.htm .• November 18, 2002.
Smith, Frank. "Remembering Pearl Harbor." [Online] Available
http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/, November 20, 2002.