This document compares various MySQL replication options including asynchronous replication, semi-synchronous replication, Schooner Active Cluster synchronous replication, Oracle GoldenGate, Tungsten Replicator, and Linux DRBD. It finds that asynchronous and semi-synchronous replication in MySQL 5.5.8 have limited sustainable performance and can result in premature sharding, while Schooner Active Cluster provides a 4-5x boost in sustainable replication performance through its tightly-integrated synchronous approach. The document also includes results from the DBT2 benchmark showing differences in throughput, response time, CPU and storage utilization, and network bandwidth across the different solutions.