SARS COV 2-COVID 19
Dr Sravan kumar G
D.M Cardiology, SCTIMST
WHEN INFORMATION DOES NOT LEAD TO WISDOM
2007
2017
• China appears to have looked other way, is liable for exporting the
virus, appears complicity of even WHO
• HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E
SARS 2002 MERS COVID 19
INFECTIONS 8098 2494 453074
DEATH 774 858 20519
CFR 10% 37%
S GLYCOPROTEIN
S1-Receptor
binding
S2 – Cell
membrane fusion
Furin Cleavage site
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
RECEPTOR hACE2 DPP4 hACE2
Reservoir Bats Bats Bats
Intermediary host palm civets
racoon dogs
dromedary camels Unknown
Potential vaccine
SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 to enter target cells
SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV bind with similar
affinities to ACE2
Structures of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in
two conformations
SARS-CoV polyclonal antibodies inhibit SARS-
CoV-2 spike-mediated entry into cells
COVID -19 – Zoonotic
• SARS CoV 2 (79% sequence identity with SARS-CoV – SARS-2002)
• Family coronaviridae Genus beta coronavirus Subgenus sarbecovirus
• Natural Host & Reservoir – Horse Shoe bats, Intermediate host --?? Snakes,
yet to discover
• ACE-2 - receptor for cell entry
(Converts Angiotensin II
(Vasoconstrictor)  Angiotensin 1-7
(Vasodilator)
• Wet market (Huanan Seafood Wholesale
Market in Wuhan City, South china)
• Live animals
• R0 value - 2.2 (1.4-3.8) - similar to SARS-CoV-1 and pandemic
influenza
January 1, 2020 until February 23, 2020.
Demographics
41 PATIENTS (DEC 16- JAN
2)
1099 PATIENTS (DEC 11 –
JAN 29)
Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb
21) 2874 Patients
INCUBATION PERIOD
(DAYS)
4
MEDIAN AGE (YEARS) 49 47 52
MALE SEX (%) 30 (73%) 637 (58%) 56%
CHILDREN 0 9 (0.9%) (0-14 YRS)
ICU ADMISSION (%) 13 (32) 55 (5) 20.3%
UNDERLYING DISEASES
(%) Hypertension
Diabetes
CVD
13 (32)
6 (15)
8(20)
6 (15)
261 (24) 36.8%
18.6%
11.9%
14.4%
HUANAN SEAFOOD
MARKET EXPOS
27 (66%)
Symptoms
41 PATIENTS 1099 PATIENTS(DEC 11 –
JAN 29)
Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb
21) 2874 Patients
FEVER (%) 40 (98) 975 (89) 89%
COUGH (%) 31 (76) 745 (68) 58%
MYALGIA/FATIGUE (%) 18 (44) 29.4%
MYALGIA 164 (15)
FATIGUE 419 (38)
DYSPNEA (%) 22 (55) 205 (19) 45%
SPUTUM (%) 11 (28) 370 (34) 28.5%
HEADACHE (%) 3 (8) 150 (14) 8%
HEMOPTYSIS (%) 2 (5) 10 (1)
DIARREA 1 (3) 42 (3.8) 6%
NASAL CONGESTION 53 (5)
SORE THROAT 153 (14) 11%
Labs
41 patients(DEC 16-JAN
2)
1099 patients(DEC 11 –
JAN 29)
Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb
21) 2874 Patients
TLC (MEDIAN) 6200 4700 18.7%
LYMPHOCYTE (MEDIAN) 800 1000 43%
PLATELET (MEDIAN) 164000 168000
HB (MEDIAN) 12.6 13.4
CRP > 10 MG/L 481/793 (60.7) 58.3%
Procalcitonin ≥0.5 ng/ml 3/39 (8) 35/633 (5.5)
Lactate dehydrogenase
≥250 U/liter
29/40(73%) 277/675 (41.0) 57%
SGOT >40 U/liter 15/41 (37) 168/757 (22.2) 33%
SGPT>40 U/liter 158/741 (21.3) 24%
Bilirubin > 1mg/dL 76/722 (10.5)
Creatine kinase ≥200
U/liter
13/40 (33%) 90/657 (13.7)
d-dimer ≥0.5 mg/liter 260/560 (46.4)
Bilateral involvement of
chest
40/41 (98) 73%
Treatment used
41 PATIENTS(DEC 16-JAN 2) 1099 patients(DEC 11 –JAN 29)
Intravenous antibiotics 41 (100) 637 (58)
Oseltamivir — no. (%) 38 (93) 393 (35.8)
Antifungal medication — no. (%) 31(2.8)
Systemic glucocorticoids — no. (%) 9 (22) 204 (18.6)
Oxygen therapy — no. (%) 27 (66) 454 (41.3)
Mechanical ventilation — no. (%) 14 (34) 67 (6.1)
Use of intravenous immune
globulin — no. (%)
144 (13.1)
COMPLICATIONS &PROGNOSIS
41 PATIENTS(DEC 16-JAN
2)
1099 PATIENTS(DEC 11 –
JAN 29)
Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb
21) 2874 Patients
ARDS 12 (29) 37(3.4) 32.8%
A Cardiac I 5 (12) 13%
AKI 3 (7) 6 (0.5) 7.9%
Shock 3 (7) 12 (1.1) 6.2%
RNAemia 6 (15) 96.8%
Death (%) 6 (15) 15 (1.4) 14%
Radiographic features Bilateral Lung Infiltrates/Consolidation
Bilateral GGO or Consolidation
Predominantly peripheral & basal
Prevention (“Flattening the Curve”)
• Median daily reproduction number (Rt) in Wuhan declined from 2.35 1 week before travel
restrictions were introduced on January 23, 2020, to 1.05 1 week after.
• Utilizing a stochastic transmission model parameterized to the COVID-19 outbreak, Hellewell et al
concluded that “highly effective contact tracing and case isolation is enough to control a new
outbreak of COVID-19 within 3 months.
• A study published on March 16, 2020 by the Imperial College of London and WHO compared 2
fundamental policy strategies to reduce the rate of spread of SARS-CoV-2: “(a) mitigation, which
focuses on slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread – reducing peak healthcare
demand while protecting those most at risk of severe disease from infection, and (b) suppression,
which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that
situation indefinitely.” The study found that “…optimal mitigation policies (combining home
isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect
cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce
peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, and deaths by half. However, the resulting mitigated
epidemic would still result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems (most notably
intensive care units) being overwhelmed.” This explains and lends support to the aggressive
measures taken by countries in recent days to battle the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
• Reports from Italy suggest that up to 20% of healthcare professionals
dealing with COVID-19 patients became infected with the virus, with some
reported deaths.
• assign one person to monitor compliance to PPE in the ED at all times
• half-lives for SARS-CoV-2 virus on various surfaces as follows:
• 1.1 hours in aerosols
• 0.77 hours on copper
• 3.46 hours on cardboard
• 5.46 hours on steel
• 6.81 hours on plastic.
• virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces
up to days
• SARS-CoV-2 virus being found in the feces of seropositive patients,
likelihood of fecal-oral and, hence, hand transmission is very high
• Healthcare professionals and patients should follow standard hand-
washing techniques
• wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after going
to the bathroom; before and after eating; and after blowing the nose,
coughing, or sneezing
• If soap and water are not available, one should use an alcohol-based sanitizer
with at least 60% alcohol.
• Additional guidelines for those with close contacts and suspicious
exposures include “strong recommendations” for
• an observation period of 14 days, wearing of a facemask if coughing or with
URI symptoms
• prioritizing private transportation over public
• prenotification of the hospital (or clinic) prior to patient arrival
• cleansing of the transport vehicle with 500 mg/L chlorine-containing
disinfectant, with open ventilation.
Use of Personal Protective Equipment
Doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is often the highest-risk procedure during the patient-
physician interaction, in terms of spread of SARS-CoV-2.
emergency clinicians should re-emphasize to the
lay public what we already know of viral
respiratory infections
• that seeking treatment in a hospital setting for mild symptoms, fever,
mild diarrhea, or cough alone likely carries with it more risk than
benefit, both to themselves and to vulnerable patients around them.
• Patients experiencing severe symptoms such as difficulty breathing,
high fever (>39°C), and an inability to tolerate oral hydration should
seek emergency evaluation
US-Young are effected 20%-20-44 Years
Treatment Strategies
• Recent in vitro studies conducted on COVID-19 have found that
REMDESIVIR and CHLOROQUINE inhibit viral infection of cells with low
micromolar concentration with a high selectivity index.
• The National Taskforce for COVID-19 recommends the use of hydroxy-
chloroquine for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection for selected individuals
as follows:
• Eligible individuals:
• Asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in the care of suspected or confirmed
cases of COVID-19:
• 400 mg twice a day on Day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for next 7 weeks; to be taken
with meals
• Asymptomatic household contacts of laboratory confirmed cases:
• 400 mg twice a day on Day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for next 3 weeks; to be taken
with meals
• Invito studies for HCQ - SARS CoV 19
• 400 mg loading dose twice daily for 1 day, followed by a 200 mg maintenance
dose twice daily for 4 days
• Nonrandomized clinical trial of 20 patients found hydroxychloroquine
treatment to be significantly associated with viral load reduction and
disappearance in COVID-19 patients, with this effect increased by the
addition of azithromycin
• Hydroxychloroquine dosing was 600 mg daily, and azithromycin was 500 mg
on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days
• Found reduction of viral load in nasal swab at day 6
• Both drugs cause QT Prolongation-be carefull
• The statistics from retrospective analyses in China indicate that up to
30% of admitted patients required NIV, while early reports from Italy
indicate figures approaching 31%
• Equip with NIV as a stop gap to Invasive Ventilation
Sars cov 2 covid 19

Sars cov 2 covid 19

  • 1.
    SARS COV 2-COVID19 Dr Sravan kumar G D.M Cardiology, SCTIMST
  • 2.
    WHEN INFORMATION DOESNOT LEAD TO WISDOM 2007
  • 3.
  • 4.
    • China appearsto have looked other way, is liable for exporting the virus, appears complicity of even WHO • HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E SARS 2002 MERS COVID 19 INFECTIONS 8098 2494 453074 DEATH 774 858 20519 CFR 10% 37% S GLYCOPROTEIN S1-Receptor binding S2 – Cell membrane fusion Furin Cleavage site YES NO YES NO YES YES RECEPTOR hACE2 DPP4 hACE2 Reservoir Bats Bats Bats Intermediary host palm civets racoon dogs dromedary camels Unknown Potential vaccine
  • 5.
    SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2to enter target cells SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV bind with similar affinities to ACE2 Structures of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in two conformations SARS-CoV polyclonal antibodies inhibit SARS- CoV-2 spike-mediated entry into cells
  • 6.
    COVID -19 –Zoonotic • SARS CoV 2 (79% sequence identity with SARS-CoV – SARS-2002) • Family coronaviridae Genus beta coronavirus Subgenus sarbecovirus • Natural Host & Reservoir – Horse Shoe bats, Intermediate host --?? Snakes, yet to discover • ACE-2 - receptor for cell entry (Converts Angiotensin II (Vasoconstrictor)  Angiotensin 1-7 (Vasodilator) • Wet market (Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan City, South china) • Live animals
  • 9.
    • R0 value- 2.2 (1.4-3.8) - similar to SARS-CoV-1 and pandemic influenza
  • 13.
    January 1, 2020until February 23, 2020.
  • 15.
    Demographics 41 PATIENTS (DEC16- JAN 2) 1099 PATIENTS (DEC 11 – JAN 29) Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb 21) 2874 Patients INCUBATION PERIOD (DAYS) 4 MEDIAN AGE (YEARS) 49 47 52 MALE SEX (%) 30 (73%) 637 (58%) 56% CHILDREN 0 9 (0.9%) (0-14 YRS) ICU ADMISSION (%) 13 (32) 55 (5) 20.3% UNDERLYING DISEASES (%) Hypertension Diabetes CVD 13 (32) 6 (15) 8(20) 6 (15) 261 (24) 36.8% 18.6% 11.9% 14.4% HUANAN SEAFOOD MARKET EXPOS 27 (66%)
  • 16.
    Symptoms 41 PATIENTS 1099PATIENTS(DEC 11 – JAN 29) Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb 21) 2874 Patients FEVER (%) 40 (98) 975 (89) 89% COUGH (%) 31 (76) 745 (68) 58% MYALGIA/FATIGUE (%) 18 (44) 29.4% MYALGIA 164 (15) FATIGUE 419 (38) DYSPNEA (%) 22 (55) 205 (19) 45% SPUTUM (%) 11 (28) 370 (34) 28.5% HEADACHE (%) 3 (8) 150 (14) 8% HEMOPTYSIS (%) 2 (5) 10 (1) DIARREA 1 (3) 42 (3.8) 6% NASAL CONGESTION 53 (5) SORE THROAT 153 (14) 11%
  • 17.
    Labs 41 patients(DEC 16-JAN 2) 1099patients(DEC 11 – JAN 29) Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb 21) 2874 Patients TLC (MEDIAN) 6200 4700 18.7% LYMPHOCYTE (MEDIAN) 800 1000 43% PLATELET (MEDIAN) 164000 168000 HB (MEDIAN) 12.6 13.4 CRP > 10 MG/L 481/793 (60.7) 58.3% Procalcitonin ≥0.5 ng/ml 3/39 (8) 35/633 (5.5) Lactate dehydrogenase ≥250 U/liter 29/40(73%) 277/675 (41.0) 57% SGOT >40 U/liter 15/41 (37) 168/757 (22.2) 33% SGPT>40 U/liter 158/741 (21.3) 24% Bilirubin > 1mg/dL 76/722 (10.5) Creatine kinase ≥200 U/liter 13/40 (33%) 90/657 (13.7) d-dimer ≥0.5 mg/liter 260/560 (46.4) Bilateral involvement of chest 40/41 (98) 73%
  • 18.
    Treatment used 41 PATIENTS(DEC16-JAN 2) 1099 patients(DEC 11 –JAN 29) Intravenous antibiotics 41 (100) 637 (58) Oseltamivir — no. (%) 38 (93) 393 (35.8) Antifungal medication — no. (%) 31(2.8) Systemic glucocorticoids — no. (%) 9 (22) 204 (18.6) Oxygen therapy — no. (%) 27 (66) 454 (41.3) Mechanical ventilation — no. (%) 14 (34) 67 (6.1) Use of intravenous immune globulin — no. (%) 144 (13.1)
  • 19.
    COMPLICATIONS &PROGNOSIS 41 PATIENTS(DEC16-JAN 2) 1099 PATIENTS(DEC 11 – JAN 29) Metaanalysis(Jan 1 –feb 21) 2874 Patients ARDS 12 (29) 37(3.4) 32.8% A Cardiac I 5 (12) 13% AKI 3 (7) 6 (0.5) 7.9% Shock 3 (7) 12 (1.1) 6.2% RNAemia 6 (15) 96.8% Death (%) 6 (15) 15 (1.4) 14%
  • 20.
    Radiographic features BilateralLung Infiltrates/Consolidation
  • 21.
    Bilateral GGO orConsolidation Predominantly peripheral & basal
  • 23.
    Prevention (“Flattening theCurve”) • Median daily reproduction number (Rt) in Wuhan declined from 2.35 1 week before travel restrictions were introduced on January 23, 2020, to 1.05 1 week after. • Utilizing a stochastic transmission model parameterized to the COVID-19 outbreak, Hellewell et al concluded that “highly effective contact tracing and case isolation is enough to control a new outbreak of COVID-19 within 3 months. • A study published on March 16, 2020 by the Imperial College of London and WHO compared 2 fundamental policy strategies to reduce the rate of spread of SARS-CoV-2: “(a) mitigation, which focuses on slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread – reducing peak healthcare demand while protecting those most at risk of severe disease from infection, and (b) suppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely.” The study found that “…optimal mitigation policies (combining home isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, and deaths by half. However, the resulting mitigated epidemic would still result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems (most notably intensive care units) being overwhelmed.” This explains and lends support to the aggressive measures taken by countries in recent days to battle the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
  • 24.
    • Reports fromItaly suggest that up to 20% of healthcare professionals dealing with COVID-19 patients became infected with the virus, with some reported deaths. • assign one person to monitor compliance to PPE in the ED at all times • half-lives for SARS-CoV-2 virus on various surfaces as follows: • 1.1 hours in aerosols • 0.77 hours on copper • 3.46 hours on cardboard • 5.46 hours on steel • 6.81 hours on plastic. • virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days
  • 25.
    • SARS-CoV-2 virusbeing found in the feces of seropositive patients, likelihood of fecal-oral and, hence, hand transmission is very high • Healthcare professionals and patients should follow standard hand- washing techniques • wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after going to the bathroom; before and after eating; and after blowing the nose, coughing, or sneezing • If soap and water are not available, one should use an alcohol-based sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol.
  • 26.
    • Additional guidelinesfor those with close contacts and suspicious exposures include “strong recommendations” for • an observation period of 14 days, wearing of a facemask if coughing or with URI symptoms • prioritizing private transportation over public • prenotification of the hospital (or clinic) prior to patient arrival • cleansing of the transport vehicle with 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant, with open ventilation.
  • 27.
    Use of PersonalProtective Equipment Doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is often the highest-risk procedure during the patient- physician interaction, in terms of spread of SARS-CoV-2.
  • 29.
    emergency clinicians shouldre-emphasize to the lay public what we already know of viral respiratory infections • that seeking treatment in a hospital setting for mild symptoms, fever, mild diarrhea, or cough alone likely carries with it more risk than benefit, both to themselves and to vulnerable patients around them. • Patients experiencing severe symptoms such as difficulty breathing, high fever (>39°C), and an inability to tolerate oral hydration should seek emergency evaluation
  • 31.
    US-Young are effected20%-20-44 Years
  • 33.
    Treatment Strategies • Recentin vitro studies conducted on COVID-19 have found that REMDESIVIR and CHLOROQUINE inhibit viral infection of cells with low micromolar concentration with a high selectivity index. • The National Taskforce for COVID-19 recommends the use of hydroxy- chloroquine for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection for selected individuals as follows: • Eligible individuals: • Asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in the care of suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19: • 400 mg twice a day on Day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for next 7 weeks; to be taken with meals • Asymptomatic household contacts of laboratory confirmed cases: • 400 mg twice a day on Day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for next 3 weeks; to be taken with meals
  • 34.
    • Invito studiesfor HCQ - SARS CoV 19 • 400 mg loading dose twice daily for 1 day, followed by a 200 mg maintenance dose twice daily for 4 days • Nonrandomized clinical trial of 20 patients found hydroxychloroquine treatment to be significantly associated with viral load reduction and disappearance in COVID-19 patients, with this effect increased by the addition of azithromycin • Hydroxychloroquine dosing was 600 mg daily, and azithromycin was 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days • Found reduction of viral load in nasal swab at day 6 • Both drugs cause QT Prolongation-be carefull
  • 35.
    • The statisticsfrom retrospective analyses in China indicate that up to 30% of admitted patients required NIV, while early reports from Italy indicate figures approaching 31% • Equip with NIV as a stop gap to Invasive Ventilation

Editor's Notes

  • #5 1. Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020.
  • #6 1. Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020.
  • #7 Figure 3. Visualization of 2019-nCoV with Transmission Electron Microscopy. Negative-stained 2019-nCoV particles are shown in Panel A, and 2019-nCoV particles in the human airway epithelial cell ultrathin sections are shown in Panel B. Arrowheads indicate extracellular virus particles, arrows indicate inclusion bodies formed by virus components, and triangles indicate cilia.
  • #9 Envelope -anchored spike protein mediates coronavirus entry into host cells by first binding to a host receptor and then fusing viral and host membranes Receptor -binding domain (RBD) of SARS -CoV spike specifically recognizes its host receptor angiotensin -converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) susceptible to SARS -CoV infection is primarily determined by the affinity between the viral RBD and host ACE2 in the initial viral attachment step
  • #10 R0 value (pronounced “R-naught”) - expected number of cases generated directly by 1 case in a population,
  • #11 Figure 4. Schematic of 2019-nCoV and Phylogenetic Analysis of 2019-nCoV and Other Beta coronavirus Genomes. Shown are a schematic of 2019-nCoV (Panel A) and full-length phylogenetic analysis of 2019-nCoV and other beta coronavirus genomes in the Orthocoronavirinae subfamily (Panel B).
  • #23 1. Giwa AL, Desai A, Duca A. Novel 2019 coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): An updated overview for emergency clinicians. Emerg Med Pract. 2020;22(5):1-28.
  • #24 1. Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, Bosse NI, Jarvis CI, Russell TW, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(4):e488-e96.
  • #25 1. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020.
  • #34 1. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30(3):269-71.
  • #35 Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, Cui C, Huang B, Niu P, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis. 2020. 1. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020:105949.